2001-05-223919REPS2666702001-05-22—————Mr SPEAKER (Mr Neil Andrew) took the chair at 2.00 p.m., and read prayers.Business2666726667Motion (by Mr Reith)—by leave—agreed to:That so much of the standing and sessional orders be suspended as would prevent the routine of business for this sitting being as follows, unless otherwise ordered:(1) Condolence motion moved by the Prime Minister in connection with the death of Mr Peter Nugent.(2) Government business.(3) Statement by the Chair of the Joint Committee of Public Accounts and Audit relating to the draft budget estimates of the Australian National Audit Office.(4) Presentation of papers.(5) Referral of Bill to Main Committee.(6) Presentation of report from Selection Committee.Condolences266672666714:02:0026667SPEAKER, MrMr SPEAKER10000PON/A10—Members will recall that at the meeting of the House on 10 May in Melbourne it was my sad duty to inform the House of the death of Mr Peter Nugent, the member for Aston, and that it was the intention of the House to offer its full condolences in respect of Mr Nugent today.14:02:0026667Howard, John, MPMr HOWARDZD4BennelongLPPrime Minister10—I move:That this House expresses its deep regret at the sudden death on Tuesday, 24 April 2001 of Mr Peter Edward Nugent, Member for Aston, and places on record its appreciation of his long and meritorious public service and tenders its profound sympathy to his family in their bereavement.I and other members of this House have participated over the years in many condolence motions, but there is always a special poignancy and a different sense in relation to those motions when they do, as they do rarely but nonetheless from time to time, come about as the result of the death of a serving member of this House. It is difficult for us in the coalition parties, and I know for many of his friends in the Labor Party, to come to grips with the fact that, when the parliament last met, as I answered questions and took part in debate I would look around and see Peter Nugent sitting in the seat which is now marked by a floral tribute. On behalf of all of the members of the parliament, I want to say to Carol, his widow, who is in the gallery, Deirdre, his daughter, and her husband, Ian, Barry, his son, and his wife Mandy, Christopher and David, two of his grandsons, and also his very devoted staff members Judy Logan and Sandra Rae, how saddened we are by Peter's death, how much we admire the contribution that he made to this parliament and to public life and how much we feel for you in your very great loss. In a way it is typical and to be expected that, if you should die as a serving member of parliament, you do so, as Peter did, immediately after a fundraiser for your own party and immediately after having returned from a very busy parliamentary delegation to China. It was some hours after Peter's death when Michael Ronaldson, our Chief Government Whip, rang me to tell me that Peter had died, and I learnt that he had been at a fundraiser in the electorate of Aston the night before with the Minister for Financial Services and Regulation. When I spoke a few hours later to Carol, she described circumstances and events at that gathering so typical of the experience of all of us over a long period of time.Peter was born on 1 April 1938 at Chelmsford in the United Kingdom. At the age of 16 he enlisted in the Royal Air Force. He served in Britain, Cyprus and Singapore and he retired with the rank of squadron leader after 24 years of service. He settled in Australia in 1977 and he then began a marketing and sales director career with a computing and information technology company. He had a great interest in politics. He joined the Liberal Party in 1980 and was Liberal Party branch president from 1982 to 1989. In 1983 he stood unsuccessfully as the Liberal candidate for the federal seat of La Trobe in Victoria. But he persisted, as so many of us did and do, and, not to be deterred, he was elected in 1990 along with some eight other Liberals in Victoria in that election. The seat had been held by the Labor Party—by John Saunderson, I think—between 1984 and 1990, and Peter has held it in differing political circumstances ever since. He became a member of an honoured class in the Liberal Party experience—particularly for those from Victoria, because of the large number of members who came in from Victoria in that election—the class of 1990. In his maiden speech in May 1990, he pointed out that no other electorate in Australia had more households paying mortgages than his seat of Aston. It was, in every sense of the phrase, a quintessential mortgage belt seat. On that occasion, he spoke of the need to focus on the areas that affected the daily lives of Australians, typically the lives of people he represented from the division of Aston.He was re-elected on three occasions in a very marginal seat. Any man or woman who does that from any side of politics deserves our respect. There are different categories of members: there are those who have the good fortune to represent very safe seats; there are those who have the challenging and character forming existence representing more marginal seats; and there are those who are somewhere in the middle who slip from the first category into the second and hope to climb back from the second into the first. Peter always regarded the seat he held as marginal. He always regarded it as an incredible honour to be a member of the national parliament.Peter Nugent was a person of very strong views. In a broadly based political party such as the party I have the honour to lead, there is a variety of views on many subjects. Peter was passionately committed to human rights issues. He had a very deep and abiding and very impressive knowledge of foreign affairs and defence matters. He was extremely committed to the process of Aboriginal reconciliation. From 1991 to 1997 he served as a member of the Council for Aboriginal Reconciliation. His convictions were evidenced by the active role he took in his membership of many committees and delegations. He was a person who treated his obligations and responsibilities as a member of parliament and as a member of the parliamentary Liberal Party very seriously and conscientiously.Peter and I did not always agree. On some issues he regarded me as being too conservative. He regarded me as somebody who perhaps on particular issues had not approached them with the same attitude that he brought to them. We sometimes disagreed. In the past we even quarrelled, but over the years a very deep respect grew and I found in him a person of great candour and honesty and very great dignity. In this political life, you can always respect a person, whatever views they hold on any issue, if they hold them conscientiously and state them with candour, decency and forthrightness. Peter agonised over a number of issues which we have struggled with as a government and as a parliament over recent years. He agonised over the challenge which the coalition parties faced in relation to the native title legislation—a very difficult piece of legislation. He contributed in a very effective way to debates on that issue within our party room. I believe he was able to properly reconcile, as so many can, both the concerns he had about the policy issues involved and also the very deep commitment he had to the Liberal Party.He was a person who understood very well the character of Australian politics. The last function I attended for Peter in his electorate last year was a fundraiser, a luncheon at a local reception place—the sort of function that has been familiar to so many of us over the years, to be found virtually anywhere in Australia. Before the time came for me to deliver the speech and answer questions, we chatted for quite some time about the different policy issues facing the coalition, facing our country and facing the parliament. I thought he analysed very succinctly and intelligently the range of views we find on some of these issues, not only within our own party and between the Liberal Party and the Labor Party but also within different sections of the Liberal Party according to which part of the country you came from. In the discussion he showed, as he had shown on so many other occasions, a very deep understanding of the nature of the political process. He was very proud of his electorate and he was very proud of his capacity to communicate to this parliament and to his parliamentary colleagues the character of his electorate. He was one of the most fantastically well organised local members I have ever visited. When you are the leader, you go into a lot of electorate offices. Some of them are very well organised—all on this side of the House are very well organised, Mr Speaker. Over the years I have come across the odd one which was not so well organised, but not Peter's. He ran a very effective ship, not just a tight ship. His electorate office was dedicated 24 hours a day to the service of the people of Aston. When we went to his funeral, many of us had the experience of meeting people from the community, right across the spectrum, including people who said, `We didn't necessarily share his politics, but we thought he did a fantastic job for the people of Aston.' It was a great tribute to his work, and I hope of some comfort to Carol and to his children Deirdre, Greg and Barry, to his stepchildren Nicholas, Victoria and Sarah and to all the other people and staff members who were his friends and his support.Peter left quite an impression on his parliamentary colleagues. He was respected and liked by all, and particularly by his colleagues from Victoria. The regular flight which carried so many Victorian members of both persuasions to parliament at the commencement of sittings is different and the poorer and the sadder as a result of Peter's death.Can I say, through you, Mr Speaker, to Carol: we love and admire your strength and the dignified way in which, through very difficult circumstances, you have so graciously reached out to many people who have been touched by his death and, even more significantly, who have been impressed by his life. We have lost a very good friend. The Liberal Party in Victoria and throughout Australia has lost a fine local member. The Australian parliament has lost a strong advocate of the cause of the disadvantaged; a strong proponent of the fundamental values of human society. On behalf of the parliament, on behalf of the federal parliamentary Liberal Party, we record our sorrow and we record our thanks to him for his contributions to our parliament. On behalf of the Liberal Party, I thank him for his service to our party. We extend our deep sympathy to Carol, Deirdre and Barry, to his two grandsons and to the extended families and to all other people who were touched in such a direct way by his life.Honourable members—Hear, hear!14:16:0026669Beazley, Kim, MPMr BEAZLEYPE4BrandALPLeader of the Opposition00—I rise to associate myself with the remarks of the Prime Minister and, on behalf of the opposition, to extend to Carol and the children here and those not here, and to the grandchildren, the heartfelt condolences of the federal parliamentary Labor Party on this very sad occasion. We have had a number of occasions, but not many, when members of this House have died, and when that occurs it is like a death in the family. He will be sadly missed—he is sadly missed. His sudden death by heart attack on 24 April cut short a notable parliamentary career. As leader of the parliamentary Labor Party, I know I speak for all my colleagues when I say that Peter Nugent stood for the things most Australians view as decent and right. He was a man of principle and he pursued his principles with conviction. He was admired and respected for this by both sides of the House. As a person who has been on the front bench for the decade in which Peter served in this place, I cannot say that I came to know him as closely as did other members on this side of the House, and they will have an opportunity in the discussion which follows to place on record their more personal recollections of his life and their relationships with him; so to a great extent my recollections of Peter will be dominated by what I saw of him in this chamber and what I saw of him in his public presentations and by speeches of his over the years that I have read. One thing is eminently clear: he was a man totally dedicated to public service. The Prime Minister told us of the fact that Peter served in the Royal Air Force for some 24 years and that he received a General Services Medal in Malaya in 1957. The organisation with which the Prime Minister identified him must have come intensively from that experience as a squadron leader in the Royal Air Force and from the administrative duties he would have pursued there. For 10 years, of course, or a bit more, he was a member of this place. In reading through his record as a member of this place, you get a picture of a devoted and competent parliamentarian who took this place and his business seriously. He was a member of the House of Representatives Standing Committee on Aboriginal Affairs from May 1990 to May 1992 and of its successor committee, the Standing Committee on Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Affairs, from 1992 through to 1993 and then from 1994 to 1996, the gap in that period being when he clearly left it in order to serve on the front bench of the Liberal Party, then in opposition. He was a member also of the Standing Committee on Industry, Science and Technology from 1990 to 1993 and then from 1996 to 1998; of the Library Committee from May 1996 to August 1998; of the Procedure Committee from October 1997, being chair from that point to August 1998; of the Committee of Members' Interests from December 1998; of the Joint Standing Committee on the National Crime Authority from 8 December 1998, and chair from 10 December 1998; and of the Joint Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade from 18 June 1996, as chair of its Human Rights Subcommittee. That is a substantial record—to have commended yourself to your colleagues in such a way that you are chosen to chair so many important committees and subcommittees. It is probably the record, too, of a person who decided he would accept with good grace that he would not serve for more than that one year on his party's front bench. There are many reasons why people do not do that. Sometimes it is because the competition is intense; sometimes it is because the balances in the party change over time, as the Japanese Emperor said at one point, `not necessarily in your favour'. It is possible also, of course, that there is an unwillingness to serve for a variety of reasons. I cannot say that I know—obviously I cannot know—the reasons why he was not a minister. Those of us on this side of the House who knew him could find few reasons that would adequately explain his absence, but nevertheless there may well have been very good reasons why he was not.The stands that he took were noteworthy, and the thing that I find, going back over his record, that is a surprise is the profoundness of his convictions for a man so recently arrived in this country. He was not a man who spent his formative years in Australia, not even a very substantial proportion of his formative years—none whatsoever in fact—and even well into adulthood he was not here in Australia. But he instantly picked up themes in this country concerned with human rights, racism, Aboriginal affairs and reconciliation with a level of intensity that belied his recent immigrant status. They were clearly convictions profoundly within him, based on the experiences he had had in his childhood, his experiences perhaps in the services and in service overseas. Looking through his speeches and his attitudes to life, he was a classic British Liberal, a party and a conviction which has for a century been wandering in the wilderness trying to find a political force on which to alight. That is not said with any mockery at all; that is a statement of fact, and it is one of the interesting features of politics within the Westminster system that that has been the case. In Britain, according to one of his obituary writers, he found that he could not join the Conservative Party, but he was able to commit himself to the Liberal Party in Australia when he came here. Then he took what was, I think, an approach to politics profoundly also within the British tradition—ideological and principled—a reflection of a view that, as you go through life in the party process, and there are 650 members of parliament, you may not necessarily get there and that, nevertheless, you have an obligation to your constituents to make a mark in the political process and make some changes. In this place, the speech which will mark him in the minds of many of this generation of parliamentarians was his speech on a speech made earlier by the then member for Oxley on the subject of race and related matters. His concluding paragraph is an interesting one. He stated:The member for Oxley talked about a whole range of other things. She talked about the Child Support Agency, she talked about the economy, she talked about national service—I might add that the green corps is a form of national service—but it seemed to me that the speech was riddled with no research, no facts, very little logic, nothing constructive, generalisations and simplistic solutions that have been proven in the past not to work. It might strike a chord with some, but it seems to me that she does neither the House, her electorate nor this country any service by making those comments. I oppose her views. I will challenge them and I will rebut them at every opportunity because I believe that is one of the reasons why my electorate has sent me here.That paragraph had been preceded by a forensic analysis of a series of bogus claims. He warned at the time against the pinpricks of racism that were occurring in the schoolyards and workplaces because of the debate then developing. `It is the daily action,' he said, `that causes damage and that causes the hurt.' As the Prime Minister said, he had a detailed, deep interest in Aboriginal affairs and immigration matters. That was reflected in his appointments, one of those appointments being to the Council for Aboriginal Reconciliation. He told the House in 1994:I believe that I perceive the start of a sea change in attitude in this country. Irrespective of whether one agrees with some of the details of the issues, public awareness about the plight of indigenous people and the disadvantaged is much greater. There is a desire to see those matters addressed and to bring about reconciliation.In the time he served on the council, since then, and of course prior to his service, there can be no doubt whatever that, whether or not we have achieved reconciliation in this country—and we have not in fact achieved it yet, although I firmly believe we will—he had the most profound conviction that we were on the right course to achieve that end. In the native title debate in this place he said that he hoped that his colleagues would treat Mabo as a good opportunity for this country, once and for all, to face up to issues which have been bedevilling it for generations.There have been a number of debates in this place in the time that I have been opposition leader related to legislation or changes to the native title legislation dealing with issues that arose out of the Wik judgment and the question of whether or not it is appropriate for the parliament to issue an apology on questions of the Aboriginal stolen generation. There has been discussion in this place on mandatory sentencing. On all occasions the late member pushed his views with strength and conviction, and he pushed them in public.As befits the fact that he was also a passionate campaigner against human rights abuses, he was Chairman of the Human Rights Subcommittee of the Joint Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade, and it was clear to all our members that he relished his role in that regard. He raised the whole plethora of human rights issues that have interested us in this region. I understand too that he served as Chairman of the Amnesty International Parliamentary Group. He said in December 1996:The pursuit of human rights is a matter of great importance for Australians. It is one of our defining characteristics, expressed colloquially as the `fair go' philosophy ... All nations, including our own, have weaknesses that must be addressed. Just as the values underpinning human rights are universal, so the human weaknesses—cruelty, tyranny, racial intolerance and war—are universal. For us, the flaws in our record are in the treatment of Aboriginal people, the homelessness amongst youth, the treatment of the mentally ill, violence against women and violence against children ... He is a man that his family can be enormously proud of. He is a man that this chamber can be proud of.Honourable members—Hear, hear!14:27:0026672Anderson, John, MPMr ANDERSON4K4GwydirNPDeputy Prime Minister10—I rise in support of the condolence motion before the House. Much has been said by the Prime Minister and the Leader of the Opposition and I see no point in restating it, except to acknowledge the accuracy and generosity of the views that they have expressed in relation to Peter Nugent, who has been so sadly lost to us. He was, as has been said, passionate about foreign policy and social issues involving the treatment of minority groups and the disadvantaged.I first became aware of this when as a young backbencher—I came in on a by-election in 1989 and he came in in 1990—I served with him on the Standing Committee on Aboriginal Affairs, at that point chaired by the member for Denison, as I recall. We went out to the north-west of New South Wales on a field trip and spent some time at Walgett and then Moree looking at a number of issues. I have to say that I did not always agree with the views of the committee, or even indeed of the member for Aston, but I certainly acknowledge that they were, on his part, very strongly held, passionately held and held with integrity. I respected him greatly for that. I think it is fair to say that, as I look back on what he learnt on that trip and the feelings that he expressed to me about it at the time, he would be in some ways delighted to see what has happened in the intervening years, particularly with such programs as the Aboriginal Employment Strategy at Moree, but he would equally have been challenged by the extent of the task that remains.He was, as has been so eloquently said by the two previous speakers, a man of open and frank nature who never backed away from his views. He certainly served on a number of parliamentary committees apart from the one that I have just touched on, including the Joint Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade, and he was chairman of the Human Rights Subcommittee from 1996 and the chairman of the Joint Committee on the National Crime Authority since 1998. As again has been touched on, he was someone who was very interested in human rights internationally, and his work as chairman of the Amnesty International Parliamentary Group since 1996 reflected that. He was, as has also been noted, a member of the Council for Aboriginal Reconciliation from 1991.He had a very great interest in foreign affairs, in particular in China. Ironically, I had been intending to visit his electorate and some surrounding electorates to look at a certain road proposal for Scoresby just prior to his death, but he in fact asked me to postpone it because of his intended visit to China. Ever seeking to oblige my Liberal colleagues, I did so; and, tragically, that particular visit was never possible and never will be, in terms of the original proposal for looking at the road—which we have now, of course, as the Prime Minister announced recently, agreed to fund and which will make a very great difference to people who live in that part of the world, whom the member for Aston continued to champion with loud and strong support. On behalf of my family and of the party that I have the privilege of leading, I do seek to express my sympathy to his family—members of which are here with us today—to his colleagues, to his staff and to his many friends in this and other lands; and I support the motion.14:31:0026672McMullan, Bob, MPMr McMULLAN5I4FraserALP00—I rise to support the motion moved by the Prime Minister and supported by my leader. The three people who have already spoken have put the facts on the record and have spoken well and strongly of the range and strength of Peter Nugent's role in this parliament, both as a local member and as an ardent advocate of issues of profound importance to him and to the nation. I want to speak principally in my capacity as shadow minister for Aboriginal affairs, because it is in that way that I had my most recent and most affecting conversations with Peter Nugent—although I had of course known him for a long time before that, and our paths had crossed on a number of occasions socially around this building and on a number of issues on which we had spoken. Before I do that, I want to speak about a couple of circumstances in which Peter's role in the parliament came, in a very human way, to be brought to my attention within the last month—in particular, about a function I attended here in my own constituency shortly after his death, and which a large number of young people who are working for the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade as trainees attended, but not in that capacity; it was a function of an entirely different character, but they were there. One of them worked in the human rights section of the department and spoke quite passionately of the representations they had received from Peter Nugent about a whole range of human rights issues. I said to him that of course I was aware of that, because Peter had been chairman of the Amnesty group, of which I was a member, and there was a longstanding tradition that foreign affairs ministers of all political persuasions had taken those representations from the parliamentary group seriously and had given them high priority. The officer said yes, that was true, but that he wanted to make it clear to me that a large number of the representations were made by Peter in his own capacity, beyond those which he had made officially. In a sense, that had made a bigger impact on the individual because there are the official duties that we perform—still with, in the case of Amnesty and many other issues, passion and commitment—but then there are the extra things you do because they are important to you as an individual. That clearly had moved this young officer, but it had a big impact on me too; and I think it speaks very highly of Peter.The other thing I want to refer to is a conversation I had a little further ago than that, shortly after I became the shadow minister for Aboriginal affairs. I will not go into the detail, because I am not sure that it is appropriate to disclose that sort of conversation, but I was very encouraged by the comments he made to me about his experiences, however brief, as shadow minister for Aboriginal affairs and about his longstanding previous and subsequent interest in those issues. He gave me good advice and much encouragement, and I greatly appreciated it. It was just one of those casual conversations you can have in the parliament when you meet people not in any prearranged way but with an opportunity to have a brief private conversation about issues of shared concern. I was impressed and gratified that he took the opportunity to do that and I thought it reinforced in a private, undemonstrative way, the points that the Prime Minister, the Leader of the Opposition and the Leader of the National Party have made about the public record.I would like mainly to direct my remarks to the advocacy that Peter Nugent made on behalf of indigenous Australians on issues that affected them. A large number of both leaders and other people in indigenous communities have spoken to me of this in the last month. It could be, of course, a very controversial policy area—it has been over the years, in the years since 1990 in particular, in that period in which Peter Nugent has been in the parliament—and he took a brave role within that controversial area. I do not want to pursue the partisan elements of it today—that would not be appropriate—but I want to indicate some of the attitudes that were articulated in this place by the member for Aston, as he then was, and to reinforce the comments made by the Leader of the Opposition about some of those attitudes.It was for just over 12 months that Peter Nugent was the shadow minister for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander affairs, from April 1993 to May 1994, but he made a very significant impact for someone who held that position for such a short time and he was outspoken in his support for many aspects of the Mabo decision. I will not go into those details, because the Leader of the Opposition has done that. I think there was a significant contribution for him to make had he stayed on the front bench; but it is to his credit that, having gone to the back bench, he continued to make that contribution.I want to reinforce the comments that the leader made about the brave speech which the member for Aston made as the first person—not only the first person on the coalition side but the first person on any side of the parliament—to speak in response to the then member for Oxley, Pauline Hanson, and he said—and he was right: I think it is important that somebody in this place is seen to be prepared to stand up and point out what I believe is the error of many of her statements.Many people followed, but he was the first and he deserves credit for that.I also want to give credit to a speech he made in parliament on 18 March 1997 in speaking on Sir Ronald Wilson and on the report on the stolen generation. He expressed views which many on this side of the House—and certainly I—shared. He said:I would have to say that Sir Ronald Wilson has been one of the outstanding Australians of our generation ...I think that is right. He went on to say a large amount more about him. In particular, I want to refer to what he said about the Bringing them home report. He said:... his report in that area is before the government and we look forward to a positive response from the government ...He then went on to say:I think that HREOC report is a very important report because, if you do not understand the significance of the impact on many indigenous people of having been taken away from their parents or having had their children taken away from them, then you do not understand the root cause of many of the problems of disadvantage today. If you do not understand the causes, then you cannot fix the problems that are manifest today. So I think that is a very important report.He was, once again, one of the first in this parliament—on this occasion not the first, but one of the first—to make those connections, to speak powerfully in support of that matter and to participate actively in the committee report into that Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission report which came before the parliament and which led to that debate.He also spoke eloquently and effectively in 1998 on the Native Title Amendment Bill and said some things which I think history will judge as prescient. I will not quote them today; it would lead us into some controversies that would be better addressed on another occasion. He also won my respect and the respect of many on this side for his principled stand on the issue of mandatory sentencing in more recent times. Those things are to his credit.We all stand with our party on many occasions and do things that are difficult and go back to our electorates and argue for them. It is doubly hard when you do things that are difficult and you are a little more isolated, and I think that is a matter for which he deserves our recognition and support. I think we all share the view that the parliament was very well served by Peter Nugent. I outlined a number of things on which I agreed with him; I certainly disagreed with him about a number of other things, but I and many of my colleagues respected his stands, particularly on the issue of race. I join with the other speakers in extending my sympathies to his family.Honourable members—Hear, hear!14:41:0026674Downer, Alexander, MPMr DOWNER4G4MayoLPMinister for Foreign Affairs10—I would also like to join other members in supporting the Prime Minister's motion and to say how deeply shocked and saddened I was to learn of Peter Nugent's death on 24 April. He was to many of us a very fine colleague and a friend. He was somebody who, throughout his time as a member of parliament—which is the only period of his life that I knew him—always showed something you look for in public life, and that is courage. There were times when he did not agree with people in his party. As honourable members may know, I was briefly the leader of the Liberal Party, and there were times when he did not agree with me, and there were times when he did not agree with my august and most successful successor.Having said that, he was always prepared to stick by his position. You do not find a lot of that in politics. You find people who sometimes feel that their own careers may be better advanced by taking a weaker line, but he did not do that. He did have the courage of his convictions, and I think it has to be said that anybody here would have to admire that, and I certainly admired him for that. Like the Prime Minister, I had my differences with Peter during those tumultuous years of opposition, but we really came very much together after the 1996 election when he became the chair of the government foreign affairs and trade backbench committee and I became the foreign minister. Throughout all that time—through those five years—we really were able to work very closely together. You always knew where he was coming from; he had a very clear set of principles. I think he was very much driven by his own experiences in the Royal Air Force, serving as he did in South-East Asia during a difficult time—in particular, in what was then called Malaya. He applied principles to international relations of what you might call kindness, and he applied them with equal value to all individuals regardless of their race or their creed or, to a very large extent, their nationality. It was this sort of conviction to kindness and to the rights, the decency and the dignity of the individual that he applied to his whole approach to international relations. Others have said that he took a very strong stance on human rights. As foreign minister I get a strong sense of who is seriously interested—as distinct from in party political terms—in human rights issues, and I would say that, of all of the members of this parliament, there was nobody who showed a greater genuine interest and a greater genuine passion for human rights at the international level than Peter Nugent did. He really did have a tremendous conviction for human rights. Over the last five years we very seldom disagreed on the sorts of approaches that Australia should take on those issues. He understood what the limitations were, he understood very well what our constraints were, but, at the same time, he did not ever want us to walk away from our principles.He, as the chair of the government backbench committee on foreign affairs and trade, would have me hauled before that committee every month or so. He would begin every meeting in a very matter-of-fact way, saying, `All right, what have you got to tell us today?' trying to force me to present some strong case for what I was doing—4K4Anderson, John, MPMr Anderson—And quite rightly.4G4Downer, Alexander, MPMr DOWNER—And quite rightly so, yes. He was always the boss and he made me answer the questions—and that was appropriate. It has, in a sense, been the toughest forum for me in the context of the parliament because it is private and there are very genuine and quite effective questions—usually well researched and well thought through. But we did not really have great points of disagreement in our respective capacities.He served in the position of chair during some very difficult periods for Australia. He served in that position through the great upheavals of 1999 over East Timor and he was always very interested, knowledgeable and sensitive to the vast issues that Australia had to wrestle with at that time. He was very committed to a lot of the work we had been doing on disarmament issues. Indeed, by coincidence, today I have just met with the National Consultative Committee on Peace and Disarmament, which is a body set up many years ago, I think in 1985, for the Minister for Foreign Affairs and the department to consult with various NGOs—the opposition is on it—and others on issues of peace and disarmament. He was the government representative on that committee from July 1999. He had a great interest in the work we did on bringing the comprehensive test ban treaty into existence, and he was a strong supporter of the Ottawa landmines ban treaty and a number of other initiatives of that type.It is also important to understand that his interest in international affairs was a sophisticated and very genuine interest. He was not one of those people who was just interested in a bit of tourist travel; he had a real intellectual interest in international relations, be they defence issues, trade issues or broader foreign policy issues. His understanding of Australia's place in the region and Australia's place in the world was a very profound and sophisticated one. Finally, others have said a little about his opposition to the sorts of things that have been articulated by people like Pauline Hanson. He was certainly somebody who always opposed extremism. He was always somebody who took a moderate and balanced view of issues—even if one would sometimes agree with him and sometimes not. I would like to end where I began: the thing about Peter Nugent that always struck me as a friend and a colleague is that he had an awful lot of courage and conviction. At a time of great stress, great strain and great sorrow, his family can take comfort from the fact that here was a man who really did make a difference, who actually came to the national parliament of Australia and stood up for something, fought for it and cared about it. He was a man who made a difference. I extend my sympathy and condolences to Carol and to Peter's family and thank him for all he did for Australia.Honourable members—Hear, hear!14:49:0026676Kerr, Duncan, MPMr KERRRH4DenisonALP00—Peter came into the parliament on the anniversary of my election on a second occasion. It was at the time I was appointed to chair the House of Representatives Standing Committee on Aboriginal Affairs, my first seriously responsible position in the service of this House, and Peter came to serve on that committee. We of course travelled extensively throughout Australia—and the now Deputy Prime Minister has recalled a time when we arrived in his electorate—through New South Wales, the Northern Territory and Western Australia, and together we learned much about the difficulties facing those of an indigenous background in this country. Some of the passion that has been reflected in the discussions I am sure emerged through the exposure we both received through that period of time.Of course, his service on that committee was cut short, because it was well recognised then that his passion, energy and talent should be recognised through higher service. He was appointed to the front bench of the Hewson shadow ministry as the shadow minister for Aboriginal affairs and, in that role, he took the experience he had acquired as a member of that standing committee on which we had both served and began to play a very significant part in carving out a strong voice on behalf of the opposition on indigenous affairs. It is not an easy role for any parliamentarian and not always a comfortable one for us in government. We hear of the attentions that have attended his relationship and his courage as a member of the governing party now in office, but at that time he was a very effective critic of some of the conduct and practices of the Labor Party then in office.In other circumstances, had fortune favoured John Hewson in the election which was lost in 1993, he would have served honourably and well at a senior level in a Hewson cabinet. The Prime Minister has adverted to the fact—and of course, this being a condolence motion, this is not a point to carp on in relation to differences but it is certainly true—that there are streams of opinion and differences in the Liberal tradition and there is no doubt that, within that larger stream of liberalism that reflects more the British Liberal tradition and, of course, is marked by previous leaders of the Liberal Party such as John Hewson on the social conditions side and former prime ministers like Menzies, there would have been an honoured, significant and long lasting role on the front bench in government as well as in opposition. His tragedy was that that election was lost and the circumstances which would have permitted his return to high office never emerged. But, of course, he accepted that with extraordinary dignity.In a system that is being increasingly characterised by a presidential focus on leaders, Peter represented a longer tradition—the self-respect that comes from being a member of a parliament—and that honoured role is a role which increasingly our media fail to focus upon and we in this House fail to honour sufficiently. I believe that, if one thing stands out as a mark of Peter Nugent's leadership, it is the regard he had for himself and the opinions he held as a member elected as a representative of his constituency. I think too that, in an age when cynicism about the political process is increasing, we all ought to cherish those amongst us who are prepared to stand on positions that they hold dear to their conscience and suffer occasionally as a consequence setbacks in this political process. There is no doubt that Peter was such a person. He was a person, though, who was able in that regard to conduct himself always with good spirits and a sense of optimism that a better future was obtainable because of the contribution he might make as a parliamentarian. Few have mentioned his capacity for friendship. He and I were entrants into a political process in which we had to rub along closely together and we then worked together in various organisations such as the parliamentary Amnesty group. More recently, through his service as chair of the joint committee looking after the National Crime Authority, we developed more than just the comradeship that happens in this place where you bump into each other occasionally; we actually did discuss our personal circumstances from time to time. Each of us has gone through difficult personal circumstances from time to time and it is good to know that, in this extremely competitive and combative environment, the basic decent goodness that shows in a person can be reflected in that capacity to have a dialogue across the chamber. So in Peter's loss I feel not only a deep sense of personal separation from somebody who I thought was a fighter for causes which ought to have been rather more successful but also a sense of personal loss of somebody whom I looked to as an example for the community of what being a member of parliament truly represents.That spark of his never went out. We have focused on his contribution to and courage in relation to the Hanson debate, and I think that there is no reason not to focus on that because more than a few on all sides of politics started to bend in the wind as a rather craven response to what seemed to be a hurricane of popular opinion at that time. Peter Nugent never bent and he demanded of us on the opposition side a courage which we also had to display and he demanded of his own side a courage which eventually was also displayed. Without him the consequences of that very difficult period might have been somewhat different. He never swayed from those commitments to public life.In a less spectacular role, as chair of the Joint Committee on the National Crime Authority, he bluntly tabled reports quite aggressively asserting this parliament's rights. For example, in one of the last reports he tabled he made the point that, if the minister were not going to give greater capacity to the committee to examine the workings of the National Crime Authority and to demand accountability, you might as well wind it up. The Labor Party, in a sense very mindful of this kind of bipartisanship, has taken some measures in this parliament to try to increase accountability in that area.I think that those of us in the parliamentary process have to honour such people. They exist on both sides of parliament. For example, on occasions I have made remarks regarding some of the difficulties that have been occasioned by the work of Senator Barney Cooney in relation to the same commitment to human rights that Peter Nugent showed on his side, but this parliament is far better for such people than were they not to have been in this House. These are the people who always hold us to the tests that we assert in public but that they actually hold to be benchmarks of whether or not a piece of conduct is honourable and worthy of support. Those kinds of measuring sticks that do not bend in the gales of public opinion, that hold to their opinions notwithstanding the popularity or otherwise of them, that demand to speak up for those who are least well off in our society and for those who are less advantaged—those who stand up in all those circumstances—are the moral exemplars that will prevent this parliament from being held in low regard. It is also worth while to know, notwithstanding an environment in which we are having this increasing focus on the leaderships of parties and a gradual transition to the way in which politics is reported as a quasi-presidential system, that there is still space in this parliament and in the hearts of parliamentarians to honour such a man. Honourable members—Hear, hear!14:58:0026678Ruddock, Philip, MPMr RUDDOCK0J4BerowraLPMinister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs and Minister for Reconciliation and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Affairs10—I wish to be associated with this condolence motion not only on my own behalf but on behalf of my wife Heather and we very much extend our condolences to Carol and members of the Nugent family. I do so, in a sense, as a kindred spirit in relation to the issues that Peter Nugent held dear and that have been areas in which, in my own parliamentary career, I have been very much involved. In the area of reconciliation and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander affairs, I serve as the minister but I served at earlier points in time on the same parliamentary committees which have been mentioned here today as he did.He had an involvement with the Council for Aboriginal Reconciliation and was actively involved in that work over a long period of time. Equally so, he had an interest in immigration and the outcome of the immigration program—the way in which we settle people here. But, more importantly, he had an interest in the more important part of immigration—that is, the refugee and humanitarian program—and, equally, an interest which is shared by a number of members of the parliament at the moment in relation to those who come to Australia to make asylum claims. And, of course, he was vitally interested in the issue in the context of how to respond humanely but nevertheless maintain a rigour in relation to the process.He was constructive in contributing in each of these areas, and I am able to say as minister and as one who would regard himself in the parliament as being a kindred spirit that I was grateful for his counsel and his advice as a friend. More particularly, given the longstanding association I have had with Amnesty International, I was very grateful, having been honoured by the Prime Minister and invited to serve in his ministry and therefore unable to continue to hold senior office in the parliamentary Amnesty group, when Peter Nugent expressed a willingness to be the chairman of the group. The issues in which we can all be judged in this place can be best seen when we come to them as volunteers, because for us they are a passion. In the area of human rights, his commitment could be seen by the fact that he was willing to lead in that area and to lead willingly and vocally. I was impressed also by his involvement in the friendship group with China, because often there is a contest between the human rights issues which we want to address and the broader importance of our relationship as nation-states. Peter was able to come to those issues with a maturity that recognised not only the issue of principle but also the issue of how to best achieve for your nation reasonable outcomes in these matters. Many people come into the parliament hoping to serve as Treasurer and they join the Public Accounts and Audit Committee, they come into the parliament hoping to be the Minister for Foreign Affairs and they join the Joint Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade, but Peter was one of those who came into the parliament to serve in those areas where we are interested in the human dimension, and the parliament would be much poorer if there were not people like Peter Nugent in it.Heather and I saw Peter only two weeks or so before his tragic death. He came with the member for Cook, Bruce Baird, and the member for Throsby, Colin Hollis, to meet with the intergovernmental group of officials that was visiting Australia to talk about, particularly, immigration and protection issues. Given the work of the Human Rights Subcommittee of the Joint Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade, which he chaired, he had an interest in engaging in dialogue with the leadership of other countries and with the immigration officials who were here. He was able to engage with them to get a better understanding of the way in which they were dealing with those issues which we are dealing with here—issues that his committee is involved in. I am pleased to be a member of a Liberal Party that was big enough to accommodate Peter Nugent. Peter Nugent was outspoken on these questions; he had a passion in relation to them and he ensured that we remain very much a party that has a human dimension to it and a capacity to deal with these issues. I am grateful to number Peter Nugent as a personal friend that I have had in the parliament. I will miss him greatly. Carol, Heather joins me in extending to you and your family this condolence, because we both regarded him very much as a friend.15:05:0026679Griffin, Alan, MPMr GRIFFINVU5BruceALP00—I would like to start by offering my condolences to Carol and other members of Peter's family. It is a particularly sad occasion to be here once again on a condolence motion for a colleague with whom I spent a good deal of time over the last eight years that I have been here. Peter was the member for Aston, and my current seat of Bruce runs alongside Aston. So I knew Peter not only from his time here but from his time in the local area. I have to say on that front that he was a tough campaigner and was very active in local community groups. If you went to functions in the area, he and Carol were always there. He was very well respected. In this business, when you share your local area with colleagues from other parties, quite often people will say things about those who are from the other party—and no doubt things are said about you as well—but the fact is that I have never heard anyone say a bad word about Peter in terms of his operation in the local area. As the Prime Minister mentioned before, the Liberal Party won some nine seats in Victoria in 1990—I know I was put out of work by one of them—and, of those nine members that were elected in those nine seats at that time, only three remain in the parliament. In fact, one of them—the member for McEwen—actually went out and came back. The Chief Government Whip, as I understand it, is retiring at the next election, which will leave Bob Charles as the only continuing member of those nine, and I think he is in trouble!Government members interjecting—VU5Griffin, Alan, MPMr GRIFFIN—The nine you won—you won nine seats at that time. That is what we are talking about here. It is a pretty major achievement: 11 years in this place when you are in a marginal seat is pretty fantastic. The average is about eight years for anybody, so those of us who have been in marginal seats and have lasted beyond four or five years can say a few Hail Marys and thank the Lord for that.On a policy front a lot has been said about Peter. I will not go through all of that again, other than to say that he believed in a fair go—he had a real concern for the disadvantaged in our society and a real concern about issues relating to foreign affairs and human rights. Much has been said about his involvement there. He was very thoughtful in his contributions and very intelligent in what he said. When he spoke on those issues, even if you did not agree with him—and I have got to say that I often did—you were always compelled by his arguments, his intellect and his commitment.As parliamentarians, all of us come to this place with expectations, hopes and dreams, and quite often they do not quite work out that way. It is true to say that in politics timing is everything; it is also true to say that in the context of this place timing was pretty cruel to Peter with respect to what he may have been, given other circumstances taking place. But as a parliamentarian he could be very proud. As the old saying goes, it is one thing to stand up and be counted and it is another thing to keep standing after the counting has finished, and he always kept standing for the issues that he saw as important. He was not prepared to be phased out or bought off in any context around that—he stuck to his views. That is something he could be very proud of and that those who were close to him can be very proud of.He was, I guess, a classic parliamentarian in the Westminster tradition. We often talk about the Westminster tradition in this place, but I think, as we all realise when we look at the classic operation of a Westminster system, ours is not quite there. But I think Peter, in his operation as a member of parliament, was very much there. He had that conviction and that preparedness to stand up on issues he saw as important. He believed and he had a go; he had integrity and he was well respected. I was at his funeral the other week and was not surprised but still impressed by the size of the crowd. It showed quite a lot about the fact that this was a man who was taken from us before he should have been and who certainly had the respect of his peers and the community. 15:10:0026680Worth, Trish, MPMs WORTH8V5AdelaideLPParliamentary Secretary to the Minister for Education, Training and Youth Affairs10—I am pleased to speak on this condolence motion today, particularly because duty called and I was not able to join Carol, whom I acknowledge today, and the Nugent family at Peter Nugent's funeral, where I would very much have liked to have been. Peter's life, as we have heard, was cut short. It is like having a member of the family die when one of us, a sitting member, passes away in such circumstances.We have already heard how Peter was born on 1 April 1938 in the UK and how he left school at 15 to serve in the British Royal Air Force in the UK, Singapore and Cyprus, a career which would span 24 years. In 1977 Peter retired from the Air Force as a squadron leader and migrated to Australia that same year. In 1980 he showed very good choice in joining the Liberal Party, and in 1983 he stood unsuccessfully as the Liberal Party's candidate in the federal seat of La Trobe in Victoria, a seat which was of course then won by the Labor Party and eventually won by his friend and colleague—who I know will be back—Bob Charles. But Peter Nugent did not give up, and in 1990, as we have already heard, he was elected to the House of Representatives as the member for Aston. He successfully defended Aston—always a marginal seat—in 1993, 1996 and 1998. After the last election he held that seat by a margin of 4.2 per cent, and I noted that Michael Harvey, writing in the Sun Herald last month, said:He forged a reputation as a strong campaigner whose hard work defined the essence of a good member.You have also heard today what a hardworking and committed member of parliament Peter Nugent was, demonstrated by his record of participation in parliamentary committee work, policy development and all that goes into the debates that we have in this place. He was passionate about helping the indigenous people of Australia. He was a member of the Council for Aboriginal Reconciliation from 1991 to 1997, and from April 1993 to May 1994 served as the shadow minister for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander affairs. Peter was a vocal opponent of mandatory sentencing and was one of us who argued against the race debate heralded by the politics of Pauline Hanson and One Nation, saying it caused `damage and hurt'. Peter was also a strong advocate of a national apology to the indigenous people. However, it should be noted that, despite his well-known views in this area, he was critical of Peter Garrett and his group, who wore `sorry' outfits during their performance at the closing ceremony of the Olympic Games, accusing them of introducing domestic politics into the Olympics.I would particularly like to associate my remarks with those already made by the Minister for Foreign Affairs, because Peter had a strong interest in these areas. He has been described by the foreign minister as decent, kind, principled and courageous, and I certainly agree with all those descriptions. From 1996 Peter was a member of the Joint Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade and chaired the Human Rights Subcommittee. At that time he also took over from Minister Ruddock as the chair of the Parliamentary Group of Amnesty International. This is where I really got to know Peter Nugent, because I too was a member of the Joint Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade and Amnesty International at that time. He and I were the only two Liberals on the Human Rights Subcommittee, which I left when I became a parliamentary secretary in mid-1997. That is certainly where I got to know Peter Nugent very well and came to admire him greatly. The committee system that works across the parliament is very good for giving people an opportunity to work hard in areas where they have great interest, and Peter certainly did that. It was, of course, with the foreign affairs committee that Peter visited East Timor in December 1999 and again this year. After his first visit he told the parliament:We met with the United Nations human rights team, who were conducting an investigation of abuses of human rights. There is no question that there have been human rights abuses on a huge scale. We must support the United Nations in its investigations, and also Indonesia in its investigations, and pursue those who are responsible for those abuses.In his maiden speech, back in 1990, Peter talked about the environment. He said:When we talk about the environment, let me make it quite clear that the environment is not the prerogative of extremists. It is the concern of middle Australia. The environment needs to be addressed in the context of action that is complementary to other activity, a necessity if this country is to survive. We have to address the real environmental problems and not just the symptoms. The vast bulk of our community, of course, most certainly rates the environment as a key issue. However, the people rank it below the economy by a significant factor. This is because most of them have the commonsense to understand that if we are broke we do not have the wherewithal to address the environmental issues properly. The costs of some environmental policies that have been suggested are prohibitive.Apart from his well known passion for indigenous, human rights and justice issues, Peter was also interested in other issues, such as technology and taxation. I am interested to learn, for instance, that he argued against the superannuation surcharge. Prior to entering parliament, Peter worked in marketing and sales in a computing and information technology company. In his maiden speech he spoke of Australia's need to embrace technology in order to prosper. Interestingly, in the late 1970s, before coming to this place, Peter worked for a company called International Computer Ltd and moved to Canberra to install the first computerised Hansard system in the Old Parliament House.I express my great sympathy to Carol and to the extended Nugent family. While I know that you will have been grieving and miss him greatly, I am sure that you will be comforted by such headlines as `Liberals lose decent and honourable man' and `Nugent an MP of “conscience and courage”'. As the Treasurer said:In the years to come they will have the satisfaction, like all those who knew and loved Peter Nugent, that he lived a life of purpose and achievement and he made a difference.The Treasurer also said:He was intensely concerned about human rights in China and East Timor.... ... ...He was somebody that was passionately devoted to reconciliation issues and from the moment he set foot in this Parliament until he left it, he had a sense of commitment to human rights and social justice and I pay tribute to him.My colleague Michael Ronaldson said that he was just a thoroughly decent bloke. The Prime Minister said:I remember the difficulties and the conflicts and the agony he felt over aspects of the native title debate in 1997.... ... ...In relation to that, Peter felt very deeply. He expressed his views with feeling and precision and passion within the party room, but he remained loyal to the party to which he was so devotedly attached.I agree with all of that, and I also agree with Ross Peake and particularly identify with what he wrote in the Canberra Times:If you've never heard of him it's probably because he was not given to shrill language and grandiose self-promotion. He made his points courteously but forcefully and he stood by them.Today I honour Peter Nugent's memory. We all understand that every politician's greatest strength and support come from their family, and Peter's wife, Carol, was his constant companion. Again, I express my deepest sympathy to Carol and her family.15:19:0026681O'Connor, Gavan, MPMr O'CONNORWU5CorioALP00—I would like to associate myself with the condolence motion now before the House and the sentiments expressed by the Prime Minister and the Leader of the Opposition about Peter Nugent. Like all members in this House, I was deeply shocked by Peter's death. I often saw Peter walking during the parliamentary sittings with Carol—a timely reminder of the aspect of family associated with our lives here in this parliament. I sat with Peter on numerous trips from Victoria and marvelled at his breathtaking honesty when he spoke about issues and policies. My parliamentary association with Peter occurred when he took the presidency of the Parliamentary Amnesty International Group and I was its secretary. I can attest to the fact that he was well organised, he was articulate on the issues and he was fearless in the way that he put his point of view.If the family will forgive me on this occasion, I will use some Labor Party parlance in talking about Peter, because for many of us in this place and for the community he was the light on the hill, a voice on particular issues that reminded us constantly of our obligation to the most decent and enduring values that bind us together in this place and as a society. Peter was never one to suffer fools lightly. That was my experience of Peter, and that was never more evident than in the contribution that he made in speeches to this place, especially the one in response to the former member for Oxley.Some members occupy a very special place in the parliamentary scheme of things because they set the standard and the benchmark for us all. Peter was one such person, because of the views that he expressed on indigenous issues and on the issue of human rights. Although I did not know him intimately and closely, I knew Peter as a professional colleague, and what came through to me was his enduring decency, his courage and his care and compassion for other human beings.This is a time of sadness for the Nugent family. But, as I have said on condolence motions before in this place in speaking about our fellow members who have passed away in whatever circumstance, as sure as night turns to day and day turns to night, the grief and sadness that the Nugent family are feeling at this point in time will be replaced by the warmest of memories of a very decent man.15:22:0026682Gallus, Christine, MPMrs GALLUSCU4HindmarshLPParliamentary Secretary to the Minister for Reconciliation and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Affairs10—I came into this parliament with Peter Nugent in 1990—we were part of the class of 1990. It is fair to say that Peter and I formed a little club of two, being somewhat on the left of some of the rest of our colleagues, so I got to know Peter very well. We did a lot of things together. We joined the parliamentary Amnesty group together. I remember that at one stage we went together to an environment conference in Perth and we were so proud that we were the only two people there from the whole parliament, including the Labor Party. We could not get the feeling out that we were greener than they were, but we felt we were holding the flag up for the Liberal side.I want to say to Carol that in one way Peter's death was typical of him: it was contained, there was nothing excessive about it—one minute he was with us, the next minute he was not. But in another way it was not like Peter, because Peter was a great person for planning and detail, and I am sure this is not how he had planned it, otherwise he would have left us all detailed instructions of what we were to say today and what we were to do!People here today have talked a lot about Peter's commitments to human rights and to indigenous affairs. We all know how true that is. But I would not like us to feel that Peter was a saint. He was one of us and, I think Carol might agree, far from sainthood. At the funeral it was referred to that Peter was a patriarch, that he liked to come to the family and sit with his family around him, giving good advice. But, Carol, that was not only in his family; Peter was inclined to do that to his colleagues as well. Far be it from me to accuse Peter of any sexism—he certainly was not sexist—but I remember very clearly in our first years here when Peter, sitting next to me, said, `Chris, when I'm a minister I think I will ask you to work for me.' Yes, Peter! There was the assumption of a bit of the English patriarch and that I would have been a good, loyal female servant to Peter. I think that, between Carol and me, we disabused him of this attitude. I knew Peter as a next-door neighbour: we had rooms next to each other from 1990 to 1993 and again from 1988 till the beginning of this year. There were numerous occasions when I borrowed milk, cookies and bread and butter from Peter—and I forgot the bowls and corkscrews—but I cannot recall an occasion when he borrowed anything from me. He did not have to, he was just so well prepared. But he did give very nice wine and cheese and chocolate parties. He used to enjoy very much sitting there with his glass of red eating the chocolates. All of us who went to those parties will miss him.Again, he was not a saint. I can remember Peter making very acerbic remarks about individuals in the Labor Party and what he thought of some of their stands. To be fair, I can also remember some very acerbic comments about his own colleagues, including, I might say, some of the ministers. But that will now disappear into history.It was mentioned that Peter was born in England and came here at a later time in his life as a British citizen. It suddenly struck me then that I had never thought of Peter as a Brit, as a Pom; that just did not come over, despite his behaviour and the way he looked—he had the look of the Royal Air Force about him. I thought of him much more as a very idiosyncratic Australian. He was very proud of his country, he was so proud to be a member of parliament, and he proved himself here.In closing, I would like to say to you, Carol, to your family, to Deirdre, who I also knew well from the time that she worked with Peter, that you have my deep sympathy. I know that you are missing a very young husband who had many years ahead of him and a very young father, as are the rest of the family. He was an honourable man, a good friend, a proud Australian and an exemplary parliamentarian.15:27:0026683Theophanous, Dr Andrew, MPDr THEOPHANOUSQJ4CalwellIND00—I was very moved to attend the funeral of Peter Nugent. It was a very emotional occasion but it did him great honour, from all the people who attended and also the expressions of grief and the things that were said about him, especially those things said about him by his children. We have talked a lot about his parliamentary life, but I was moved to hear so much about his commitment to his family and the way he spent so much time with his family and had such dedication for them. Indeed, I could not imagine how he managed all that and the massive parliamentary load that he took on in the human rights area. Carol has been mentioned. She was a friend of me and my wife, Kathryn, and so was Peter. He showed that the many dimensions of his interest in world affairs were not only of this period when he used to engage Kathryn, who is an archaeologist, in discussions about her work and the things that happened in the ancient world.The Minister for Foreign Affairs said that Peter had an intellectual interest in foreign affairs, and that is correct. His interest in human rights was not simply fighting on a narrow agenda. It was an interest in human rights, but also looking at how we can organise the world so that there could be a better respect for human rights. In other words, he tried to have an international vision of a world in which human rights could be respected, notwithstanding the diversity of the world and the current problems of globalisation.I discussed this matter with him, in fact, on a number of occasions because he wanted on each occasion to try to ensure that human rights could be achieved in a concrete way. This was exemplified in relation to China: he had this apparently contradictory position of being chairman of the Australia-China Parliamentary Friendship Group while at the same time insisting on human rights with respect to China. The reason he did that was that he believed that, in discourse and discussion with the authorities in China, some progress could be made on human rights. His vision in these areas needs to be commended. The Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs mentioned his concern about refugee humanitarian issues and about asylum seekers. As is well known, I do not entirely agree with the minister on these matters, but Mr Nugent, the honourable member for Aston, did discuss these matters with the minister and me, and with many others, and did try to ensure that we moved along in a humanitarian way on these critical issues. The same is true for Aboriginal reconciliation, and much has been said about his work in that area.Peter Nugent was an example of a member of parliament who had the courage of his convictions. What he also illustrated was the need for this parliament to allow more latitude and freedom for people to express such views without the party whip being too strong. It would be a very good thing if there were more people like Peter Nugent in the parliament who not only privately express views but are ready to stand up in this House and in public and pursue those views even if they may not at that time be the views of their own party, because there will come a time when they will be the views of their party. I believe that Peter Nugent was an optimist. He believed in the evolution of human rights, not only here in Australia but throughout the world. He believed that it could be achieved. I hope that all members of the House will somehow contribute to that optimism and that we in Australia and in the Australian parliament can respect the memory of Peter Nugent by actually doing more to promote human rights not only here but also internationally. My fellow member, Independent Peter Andren, who is not here at the moment, also shares these views and wants to express his deep respect for the courageous and principled views of Peter Nugent. Finally, to Carol and her family, I say that they can be very proud of the life of Peter Nugent and what he has contributed to Australia and to the international human rights movement. 15:33:0026684Charles, Bob, MPMr CHARLESOT4La TrobeLP10—I rise to support this motion of condolence, and I do so on both my behalf and that of my partner Rosie. Let me say in the beginning that Peter Nugent and I were mates. Peter, Carol, Rosie and I became good friends. That is not an easy word to use in this place. I think we all know that it is very difficult to form friendships in this rather hostile environment. There is nothing about the parliament environment or the political environment that is `normal'. Most of us recognise that. We have colleagues, comrades and neighbours, and we come together in loose and tight coalitions of one form or another, but we make very few friendships. I was honoured to have Peter Nugent as a friend, and to call him a friend. We actually had much in common. Firstly, we were both immigrants—we were both new Australians—and both proud of our adopted country. Despite misgivings in coming into this place in 1990, colleagues on both sides accepted both of us and many others who have come from other lands as Australians, as bringing to this place ideas from our constituency and as representing Australia, not some overseas interest. Peter was proud to be a new Australian. For a time, he and I went to citizenship ceremonies together and then we used to trade off for a while—one at a time—but both of us very much looked forward to those occasions when we could talk to other new Australians about our experiences and about what a great country it is and how it has so welcomed people from all the lands on earth. It has become truly the great melting pot of the world.Both of us stood for election in La Trobe, unsuccessfully—Peter in 1983 and I in 1987. We still seem to have made it here, but we both did stand for La Trobe unsuccessfully. We both won Labor seats in 1990—Peter in Aston and I in La Trobe. We instantly became part of that infamous class of 1990. That was a great bunch of people, may I tell you. That was big historic stuff. We won nine seats from Labor in Victoria in 1990, and the Treasurer and the Minister for Education, Training and Youth Affairs also won seats as new members. We had senators as well, and Alex Somlyay from Queensland and others around the joint, but the class of 1990 was very close. We were. It was one of those institutions which, unfortunately, the member for Bruce has described as declining in numbers. I regret that. Peter and I both had a strong belief in Liberalism, in the value of this great party, which the Prime Minister describes as being a broad church and which I would describe as being a melting pot of ideas, of conflicting interests and of resolution to drive towards the better human experience. Peter and I held adjoining electorates. He talked about Aston as his patch, and you did not want to violate Peter's patch—that was his patch and he grew his constituents well, because they liked and respected him. You cannot ask a whole lot more than that out of this job and this place.We were not always friends and we were not always close. In fact, from our election in 1990 until the election in 1996, Peter and I were competitors. People listening to this broadcast and reading the Hansard may find that somewhat difficult to understand, since we both belonged to the same Liberal Party of Australia. Certainly my colleagues on the other side of the House well understand that because we all compete for a frontbench position. We all want to be on the treasury bench, we all want to be in the ministry, in the executive, and we are not all going to make it. In fact, none of the infamous class of 1990 made it. In 1996, after Peter and I realised that we were not going to be ministers, we gave up and became friends—that is a fact. In 1997, Rosie and I got to know Peter and Carol really well, and some of my colleagues on the other side as well, when Bruce Reid, the former member for Bendigo, led the Australia-China Parliamentary Friendship Group on a two-week semi-official visit to China very shortly on the heels of the Prime Minister's visit with a number of formidable Australian business people. Peter was the secretary of that group. I say semi-official in that we were guests of the Chinese government for two weeks.In 1999, I went back with Peter and Carol—a lot of us went again—and on this occasion Peter was chairman and I was secretary. There was one commonality about both of those experiences: that is, the Chinese treated us magnificently. We stayed in five-star hotels, we ate magnificently, they took us to see the treasures and beauties of China, including five days in Tibet, and we met many PRC officials including, twice, Zhu Rongji, the Premier of China, with whom we held long discussions and who is a great friend of Australia. Some have talked about a conflict of interest for Peter between human rights and a close friendship with China. It did not destroy his friendship with China or with the Chinese; it was very important to him and a very important part of his life. Those were great trips. Another commonality between the two trips was the fact that Carol was the one behind the scenes who did all the work— that, absolutely, is a fact.Peter was a champion of social justice. Others have talked about his expertise in this area. He believed in human rights and fought hard for them. He knew a lot about international affairs and used his expertise to good advantage in this place and when he was overseas. He and I walked together in the Melbourne march for reconciliation. I appreciated that opportunity. There were many things on which we did not see eye to eye. We were not exactly soul mates on some social policy issues, but that is hardly surprising. It did not stop us being friends or having the greatest respect for each other. He was a compassionate, loving and warm human being. Since his passing, I have not found anyone who has had an unkind word to say about Peter Nugent.On the night of Peter's passing, Peter and Carol had a fundraising function in his electorate at Nelson's Restaurant in Knox. Rosie and I joined them to support Peter and also Hurtle Lupton, member for Knox, and his wife Dawn. The Minister for Financial Services and Regulation was our guest speaker on that night. We spoke only briefly with Peter, unfortunately. He had returned just the night before from a trip to China resulting from a meeting we had had here with mayors from a number of provinces. I asked him how the trip went and he said, `Bob, we'll have to wait until we both have an hour to spare. I want to tell you about it, but it was terrible. It was really awful. I think it was because of the arrangements—little sleep and poor organisation.' I also said, `How are you? You have just got back and here you are in the maelstrom again at a fundraising function immediately the next night.' He said, `To tell you the truth, I don't feel too well.' We parted at about 11 o'clock and at 2 o'clock in the morning, very suddenly, he left us and left his lovely wife, Carol. May I say to Carol and to her children, Nicholas, Victoria and Sarah, to Peter's children, Deirdre, Barry and Greg, to his sister, Janet, to his nephew, Christopher, to his staff, to all those who were dear and precious to him: you have our greatest sympathy. 15:44:0026686Ferguson, Laurie, MPMr LAURIE FERGUSON8T4ReidALP00—I join with the parliament and my colleagues in conveying to Carol and her family our deep regrets at Peter's death. The Prime Minister remarked that, when it is one of your contemporaries, one of your colleagues, it is so much more telling. Could I also add that, when you are overseas and distant from this country and do not have contact with colleagues and are unable to be in attendance at a funeral, that also adds to the degree of shock you suffer. I was overseas at that time, and I was indeed shocked and very saddened by Peter's demise. It hit me very strongly.My association with Peter began in 1990 and stemmed from activities involving the Timor question, when he and some other people on the opposite side such as the member for Hindmarsh and the member for Ballarat were able to be supportive of, let us say, those members of the parliament who, regardless of who dictated foreign policy in this country, were far more critical far earlier than others were of Australia's role in relation to Indonesia and of the continuing human rights abuses after the Timor occupation. I do not want to dwell on the things that have been often mentioned—Peter's activities around indigenous issues, mandatory sentencing and the race issue—but I want to particularly take up the emphasis of the member for Corio, who said that Peter did not suffer fools easily. One thing that stood out for me about Peter's role on human rights—and I think the Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs to some degree referred to this—was his very pragmatic, sensible approach. In pursuing a variety of issues, he was not one to be there for cheer chasing, for popularity, for sloganising. Many members have referred to China. The essential issue there is the degree to which we have constructive engagement with a country about which we have some questions and some criticisms. People can often be critical of the government of the time when it says that it is in constructive engagement with Burma, for instance: is it genuinely in constructive engagement or is it part of a trade situation or whatever? But I do not think anybody could doubt that Peter Nugent's role in the Chinese Friendship Group and his engagement with China would have been accompanied very strongly by indications to that government that we did have a variety of criticisms and concerns about the way they handled human rights in that country—whether about Tibet, whether about workers' rights in factories, et cetera. Similarly, in regard to immigration policy he would have strongly adhered to the requirement for humane treatment, but he would have—and I know this for a fact—absolutely understood that it had to be viewed in the context of the need for a detention policy. He was a very realistic, pragmatic, sensible person in his campaign for human rights. Many members have referred to his activities in the Amnesty International group in which I am also proud to have played a long-term role. His resignation from the position of chairman of that group, which has been mentioned by no other member today, personified his very genuine and sensible emphasis on the human rights area. When he saw that organisation, to his mind, starting perhaps to be a bit dictatorial in its processes, a bit too inclined to prescribe and to actually say, `If you are not with us 100 per cent on every issue then you are not a campaigner,' he decided to resign as chairman. I am glad to say that the vast majority of people who were active on that committee supported him very strongly in that position. I do indeed join with the previous speakers in saluting Peter's broad interest in human rights around the world, his continual search for knowledge of other societies and his interest in their policies, and to his family again I convey my deep regrets.15:48:0026687Hockey, Joe, MPMr HOCKEYDK6North SydneyLPMinister for Financial Services and Regulation10—I consider myself to be still a relatively new member of this place. On the very solemn occasions when you, Mr Speaker, ask us to rise for a minute's silence as a mark of respect for a previous member, in that minute of silence I often reflect on the spirits that must be breezing around in this chamber and on the fact that, even though I cannot identify the name and I do not know what they did in this place, their spirit continues to live on in this chamber. There is a very special place for Peter Nugent in this chamber because he was a champion of a very important cause. He was a champion of modern liberalism. He was a champion of small `l' liberalism which has pride of place in the broad church of the modern Liberal Party. In many ways the friendship between the member for La Trobe and the former member for Aston is a reflection of the broad church of the Liberal Party, the fact that a small `l' liberal such as Peter Nugent can take a leadership role within the moderates and hold deep philosophical views about the importance of liberalism, can work with a number of others to get the John Stuart Mill Society up and running, even though it has not met for a little while, and at the same time also embrace as very close friends people who may have at times differing views on a particular social policy.One of the reasons why I say Peter's place is in this chamber for evermore is that I remember that, when I came in as a new member in 1996, like so many new members I struggled with what I was going to say in my maiden speech. After my speech, there were only two new members left to deliver their maiden speeches, the member for Oxley and the member for North Sydney. I decided to give a speech about modern liberalism. Immediately after my speech, the member for Oxley rose and made a speech which will have no pride of place, I believe, in this chamber. But it was her maiden speech and she believed in it. When your instincts say, `This is just not right,' and you really want to say something but as a new member you do not know how to say it, you turn to people with experience and you look to them for leadership. Peter Nugent was a person who showed immediate leadership by immediately coming into this chamber and saying, `I refute your position.' That gave me a lot of courage to stand up in this place to say what I think and to react to the instincts that we all hold dear.There was a humorous side to Peter Nugent which sometimes can be lost in these motions. I well remember that in late 1997 the member for Grayndler, the member for Watson—the Chief Opposition Whip—the member for Gippsland, Peter Nugent and I were invited to go on a trip to the Middle East. We decided that it was a good idea to take my father along, for two reasons: firstly, because he spoke Arabic and Hebrew and he would be able to understand whether the taxidrivers were ripping us off, and, secondly, because we did not want Peter to be the elder statesman of the trip—even though we made him the leader, because we all agreed that Leo McLeay was certainly not diplomatic enough to balance the interests of Israel and Palestine and Egypt on the one trip, let alone the member for Grayndler.I recall being in a van crossing the desert from Egypt to Israel after Peter had had some very unsettling Arab food the night before. We stopped in the middle of the desert so that he could exit the van: there were certainly no facilities around. It was quite a scene there in the desert with this fairly old van, with Peter Nugent standing outside and with complete red earth. There were a few jokes inside the van, as you can imagine, and we thought that we should share one with Peter. When Peter hopped into the van I said to him, `Don't worry, mate. Moses had a rough trip across the desert as well, from Egypt into Israel.' He did not see the humour in that, I must say, so we decided not to have any more jokes at his expense. But we also understood that he was a great source of advice in handling the very delicate situation involving discussions with the governments of Israel, Palestine and so on. Finally, let me say that I think it is very important that we all take an opportunity to reflect on Peter's contribution not only to international affairs but particularly to the people of Aston. One night when I was with him—we had a function in his office, organised by his team—I had the opportunity to have a long chat to some of his key supporters in the Liberal Party, particularly his conference president. We all stated how important it was for Peter to be with us and to continue as the member for Aston for an extended period. When you meet a whole lot of people in the local area you always get a sense of how well liked a member is and how much they appreciate his contribution. There was a very strong admiration within the Liberal Party in Aston for what Peter was doing. There was a great determination to ensure that he was back at the next election because he was making a great contribution not only to the parliament on behalf of the people of Aston but also, and I think importantly, to all those people that care about human rights anywhere in the Australian community.We then went to the function at the restaurant which the member for La Trobe talked about. Again, walking around the room I clearly sensed that Peter had a very loyal band of supporters who would do anything to support his re-election. Importantly, they were giving their support because they liked him. When we stepped outside the restaurant and it was just Peter and me I said to him, `Mate, we really want you. We really need you back.' He said, `Don't worry. Just fix up the problems with the financial planners.' I said, `I'll fix that, but we really want you back because you are very important to us.' He said, `Joe, it's not so much about me being in parliament: it's about how important it is to do the right thing.' Those are words that will live with me for evermore. Certainly, on each occasion when we rise to think about the spirits that are above us in this chamber in memory of another member who may have passed on, I will be thinking about Peter Nugent.15:57:0026688Melham, Daryl, MPMr MELHAM4T4BanksALP00—I rise to associate myself with the remarks that have been made in respect of Peter Nugent. I was elected to this place at the same election as Peter—the election of 24 March 1990. Whilst I have not served on parliamentary committees with Peter, I had the privilege of basically having the same portfolio as he had for a brief period, that of Aboriginal affairs. For a short period he was also on the Council for Aboriginal Reconciliation when I was a member and he was subsequently replaced by the honourable member for Murray.You do not have to be a minister to have made a contribution in this place. If anything, I think the fact that Peter Nugent was not a minister in this government says more about the government than it does about Peter Nugent himself. It actually shows—and I think it is a demonstration—that he stood for principle, he stood up for what he believed in. There is a theory that it might have cost him. That is a matter of speculation. Instead of lying down and being embittered or whatever, he made a contribution in other forms. He was active in the committee system. He never really held grudges.I can remember that time and again in this place he made wonderful principled speeches. When I was shadow minister we often attempted to put forward amendments in a number of difficult debates to try to entice him over to our side of the House in the debate. He certainly made strident speeches, and he was a party loyalist. The best that we were able to do was when, on an odd occasion, he would go missing when a vote was taken. I respected him deeply for that. In many respects we are all party loyalists and it is a big thing to cross the floor or even to go missing. But he took that step. That is not to say necessarily that his party was wrong or whatever; it is a question of where you need to take your party with you.On many of these issues, he was in a minority in his party, but history will treat him kindly. It is true that he was one of the first to rise and attack the member for Oxley for what was probably the lowest speech ever delivered in this place, and he deserves tribute for that, and so I salute him. More importantly, I know that as politicians we tend sometimes to score off one another. But to me the real testimony of Peter was that when he was shadow minister for Aboriginal affairs he actually went in to bat for the Aborigines and that he also went into bat for them when he was in government in a very difficult period. I do not want to sit in judgment one way or the other: history will record it, but sometimes it is not accurately recorded. I know how Patrick Dodson and the indigenous community felt about him: they loved him, they respected him and they held him in very, very high regard. It is not easy to win the trust of the indigenous community, especially if you are a politician in this place—given this nation's history over 200 years—but he did have their respect throughout his period in this place and he was someone whom I know that Patrick Dodson, Lowitja O'Donoghue and others would want to be remembered with, in terms of this condolence motion. So on their behalf I say to his family that they loved him: he made a contribution and he remains with them. Physically he is not with us, but he is with us in spirit, and decisions that he took will come back time and time again so that, when we have to make difficult decisions as well—and politics is not easy at times—he will be a benchmark. I salute him, I pay tribute to him, and I think you have a lot to be proud of.Honourable members—Hear, hear!16:01:0026689Nelson, Dr Brendan, MPDr NELSONRW5BradfieldLPParliamentary Secretary to the Minister for Defence10—Like the member for North Sydney, I have only been here for a short time and I have never spoken on a condolence motion. I have always felt, until now, that it was inappropriate to do so, no matter how worthy the people whom we were remembering. As Bob Charles said, we have a lot of colleagues here but we have fewer friends. But I can certainly say that I considered Peter to be a friend as much as a colleague. I first met Peter Nugent in 1991. I was then vice-president of the Australian Medical Association and I had been instrumental in organising a meeting to consider the treatment, or the ill-treatment, of many women in the medical profession. We organised a conference that was attended universally by women, but a man arrived: in fact, I thought he was at the wrong meeting or that, indeed, his motives might not have been what I subsequently found them to be. It was Peter Nugent, and he was the member for Aston.He came to the meeting and not only did he not make a perfunctory visit, as I think sometimes people in public life do, but he sat there all day and took notes and listened, and he even came to the dinner that we had that evening for these women. He said to me in the morning break, when in fact I asked him why he was there, `It's about time you ...'—and I will not use the actual word he said, but it was not a complimentary term to use of the medical profession—`did something about this, and you need some encouragement to do it.' That began for me what has been a 10-year relationship, off and on, with Peter Nugent.Every experience that I had with the man between then and his death has been, as so many others have said, consistent. His principles were not tradable commodities. He was a person whose life was summarised, as the Minister for Foreign Affairs said, as a life of courage. It was also, as the Leader of the Opposition and the Prime Minister have said, a life of conviction. And above all of that was the question of conscience in everything that Peter did, everything that he said. Beneath it all was this question: what is the right thing to do? I do not know about my other colleagues and my friends here, but I often felt a little awkward in Peter's presence because there were some things in which I believe that he also believed in, but he had shown much more courage and had paid a higher price for his beliefs than I had; and that always made me feel a little awkward being around him, as much as I enjoyed his company. In 1992 he again, as a member of parliament representing a critically important seat for the Liberal Party in Victoria, attended for two whole days a meeting here in Canberra to look at the human and health effects of unemployment. I suspect there was very little electoral support in it for him and I suspect that no-one knew he was there; but I knew he was there. In the following year, he attended another conference for two days, again in Canberra, on Aboriginal health and he made a contribution that I will not forget. It was essentially to remind all of us, as I think he might have said at the time, that whilst he represented an area of Australia which was very typical of middle Australia—as the Prime Minister reminded us today—we had much to achieve when we looked at the appalling status of Aboriginal people, in their health and living standards and outcomes for life.It is interesting that Peter died at a time when his seat was in the back row. I sat in the back row until very recently and I may end up back there. When young students come down here to Canberra, they ask you, `Where do you sit?' They have the idea that if you sit in the front you are important and if you sit in the back you are not important. I am sure that my colleagues here do a great deal to disabuse the next generation of that view, but I explain to them that the people with experience and wisdom are often placed in the back row to help those of us who do not have those things. And Peter was there for that reason as much as anything.I had a very difficult time in my teenage years, as most of us do. I remember that when I was 14 my mother, seeking to reassure me about things, said that in the end your success in life would be measured by the causes and the people to whom you commit your life. It is interesting that we are well over two hours into this condolence motion, and most of us, including our Prime Minister, are still here for a man who finished his parliamentary career physically on the back row of the parliament but very much at its centre.Last year in September I was privileged to go to an ASEAN meeting in Singapore. Of all of the things that surprised me about that meeting was the very high regard in which Peter Nugent was held by parliamentarians and leaders in our region. There was a genuine interest in his welfare, and respect for what he had done. So many others today have gone through the principles for which he stood. I feel above all else that Peter Nugent was a man who led from principle, not from position. He was a man whose principles led us to what in our hearts we knew so often to be right. He did not lead from the front row of the parliament; he led from the back row of the parliament, but he led from the front row in terms of principles.The Leader of the Opposition suggested—and I think the member for North Sydney alluded to this also—that in Peter's native land of Britain he might have been a Liberal-Democrat, and the member for La Trobe and others have mentioned also the broad church in the Liberal Party. It is worth remembering that Peter Nugent was in every sense a true Liberal—he was a liberal Liberal—on economic issues, on industrial relations and on social policy. He looked at everything with an open mind. He personified that which Menzies described when he said that true Liberals owe great and imperative obligations to the sick, the weak and the unfortunate and that to every good citizen the state owes not only a chance in life but a self-respecting life. I feel that Peter Nugent personified and lived by those principles. The measure of character in people is not what they do or say when they are being watched but what they do or say when they are not being watched. He in every sense was a liberal Liberal, and I know he will be remembered long after many of us are footnotes in history. It has been a privilege to have known the man, to have worked with the man and to have played some small part in helping him with some of the causes that he thought were important.16:09:0026691Hollis, Colin, MPMr HOLLISDH4ThrosbyALP00—I support the motion moved by the Prime Minister. The sudden death of Peter Nugent came as a particular shock to me because, over the years, I got to know Peter quite well. For the last two parliaments I have been his deputy on the Human Rights Subcommittee of the Joint Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade, and I also worked with him on this committee for many years before that. Only quite recently we visited all the detention centres throughout Australia—a particularly moving experience. At the time of his death we were putting the finishing touches to the committee's report on detention centres, which will be tabled during this session. The Human Rights Subcommittee is a particularly busy committee, but it is also one that is put under considerable pressure, especially emotional pressure. At our weekly meetings many diverse groups, all detailing abuses of human rights, come to see us not only from Australia but from overseas or representing people from overseas. A recent report of that committee was Hong Kong: the transfer of sovereignty. Peter, I and other members visited Hong Kong during this inquiry. It was particularly interesting because, although Peter was the chair of the committee and I was the deputy chair, among the committee members were Ian Sinclair and Barry Jones. They each thought they were the chair or the deputy chair of the committee, and I often wondered how long it would be before Peter would explode because, immediately we got into the question and discussion period, everyone in the region knew Ian Sinclair and Barry Jones. But Peter never once worried that they were so prominent in that visit.We also recently brought down a report on Australia's regional dialogue on human rights and a particularly difficult one on freedom of religion, and the one we have been working on for some time now is the report on the detention centres. People here have also mentioned Amnesty International. I also worked closely with Peter on the Amnesty International Parliamentary Group and, until quite recently, Peter was the chair of that committee and I have been the secretary.Working for many years with Peter on the Human Rights Subcommittee, as well as Amnesty, I came to appreciate his commitment to human rights. Human rights is a very complex issue and there are all sorts of balances that have to be struck. As the member for Reid mentioned, Peter understood the complexities surrounding human rights issues. It is not always easy to take a stand on human rights, as so often Peter did. Just look at the debate that is going on in this country, and will go on in this country, about the detention centres. It is an extremely complex and difficult issue that we have to come to terms with. I also visited Timor with Peter twice—again, we were looking at human rights issues.The Prime Minister made mention of how well Peter's electorate office was organised. I never visited his electorate office but, having worked with him closely for some time on many issues, I have visited his office here in Parliament House many times. And my staff often visited his office at Parliament House and they were greatly impressed. Members of this chamber who have visited my office know that, although it might be one of the best decorated, it is certainly not the tidiest office in Parliament House. Papers are usually strewn over my desk. After a visit to Peter Nugent's office, my staff would always come back to me and say, `Colin, have you seen his desk? There is not a paper on his desk; there is no mess; there is nothing.' A hint was always there that I should follow Peter's example in the way he worked his own desk. I am not sure if it was Carol who made sure that it was so tidy, but I once challenged Peter on that and he said, `Colin, that is a result of'—whatever it was—`18 or 20 years in the Air Force.' It most certainly made a lasting impression on me and especially on my staff.I did attend his funeral. One of the sad duties that many of us as members have to perform is to attend funerals in our electorates of people we know and of people in the community. I am not a particularly religious person and I often find religious services at funerals a little difficult, but I often find that non-religious services do not convey somehow the correct atmosphere. I must say that Peter's service was a great service. It combined all the elements. I said to someone at the funeral—it may have been you, Mr Speaker—that if I could have a funeral service like Peter's it would be great, if `great' is a word to use when talking about funerals. It really was a great celebration of his life. I thought that the celebration of his life in the service was a tremendous note. I will miss the meetings with Peter and miss especially his commitment to human rights. This parliament and, indeed, this nation is the poorer for his passing. To you, Carol, and the Nugent family, I offer my sincere condolences.16:15:0026692Tuckey, Wilson, MPMr TUCKEYSJ4O'ConnorLPMinister for Forestry and Conservation and Minister Assisting the Prime Minister10—I would like to commence by leaking a secret out of the party room which you might also remember, Mr Speaker, because shortly after my appointment as a minister—and, for those on the other side, you would realise that ministers do not get the right to speak in our party room—ZD4Howard, John, MPMr Howard—I have never noticed that with you, Wilson!SJ4Tuckey, Wilson, MPMr TUCKEY—Peter got to his feet and said to the Prime Minister, `I've got to congratulate you warmly on Wilson Tuckey's appointment—this is going to take an hour off party room meetings every week.' And might I say that such was my mutual respect for Peter he got away with it.I really do need to say some very complimentary things about Peter Nugent. On one occasion, which will be remembered by the Chief Opposition Whip, Peter asked for protection from this parliament—many people did not know just how to do it—because he was being threatened with a defamation action by a public servant for writing on behalf of a constituent. I took that situation extremely seriously—for someone who was not even a close acquaintance. With the cooperation of some backbenchers from the then government and some of my own colleagues, I had the honour to be able to get a resolution in this House that demanded of those people not only that they withdraw but that they apologise. It is a matter of record that that happened. This is of great interest because members will not be surprised to learn that at times Peter will have been encouraged to criticise some of my views. It is well known to me that he would always say to colleagues, `No, I won't have a bad word about Tuckey—he stuck to me when I needed him.' That is what Peter was all about. The important thing that I think is worth saying is that, for one who did have disputes with Peter, I can never remember one that was acrimonious; in fact, to the contrary, it would usually be with that typical twinkle in his eye that he would disagree with you, put his point lucidly and frequently win the argument. I too had the opportunity to serve with him on the government Aboriginal affairs committee when we had to deal, as we did, with the legislation we brought to this House. More frequently than not Peter's contribution, while passionate, would be very practical. He was not, if I can use these words without being too insulting to anyone, a bleeding heart. He was a very committed person to the issues he believed in and, what is more, he would always come up with proposals that were practical and frequently achievable. I think that was one of his great assets. Contrary to the suggestion that he lacked a sense of humour—and I note that the Minister for Financial Services and Regulation did make that point—I found him very clever and very witty and often to the benefit of his own point of view. If I can put probably not the small `l' liberal position on Peter Nugent, I thought he was a great fella, I greatly appreciated the contact I had with him and I agree with all the other words that have been said today about his commitment and his commitment to this place. I say to his family how deeply sorry I am that he is no longer with us. I do think that mine was a great association—one with a person that I admired greatly and, as I have said, I will let never forget his contribution, Prime Minister, in the party room. It was probably very well said. On the other hand, as I have said, we were friends enough that he could get away with it. 16:20:0026693Crosio, Janice, MPMrs CROSIO7T4ProspectALP00—I too would like to join with the Prime Minister, the Leader of the Opposition and the previous speakers in offering condolences to Carol and the family of Peter Nugent. Many of us remember when we hear something that gives us a shock exactly what we were doing at that particular time. I was in transit from an overseas delegation and I had rung my office, as finally I could get a phone that worked, and said, `What's happening?' and they said, `We've just heard a news flash over the radio.' I was in the middle of a hotel foyer and all I did was plop onto my luggage and say, `Ring me back.' It was a shock. It was a shock because, of all people, he was the last I thought would have gone as suddenly as he did. I came into parliament with Peter in 1990. We were very observant when the clerks were telling us what we were to do in parliament and what we were not to do in parliament and we then went to lunch, and that was the first time I ever sat and spoke to him. I thereafter shared time with him on a number of committees, but more importantly we became closer, as the member for La Trobe has mentioned, through our parliamentary friendship groups. I, with my husband Ivo, travelled with Peter and Carol as delegates in 1997 and again in 1999. Peter led many delegations and travelled as a member of parliament in delegations, but one of the things we have got to appreciate and understand is his firm commitment to Australia's place in the Asia-Pacific region. This came out very clearly not only when we were overseas but also when he spoke with ambassadors or delegations here in this parliament. I am sure that the member for Bradfield will not mind, but Peter would have said to you, `Just to be one of the 148 and having a seat in this parliament out of nearly 19½ million people is an honour in itself, no matter where you sit.'I would like to relate some personal details other than on the humanitarian part, because that and Peter's firm commitment to Amnesty International have been mentioned. When we first went over in 1997 to China—I refer to the delegation led by Bruce Reid—there was a great debate one night at a dinner with our Chinese delegation. Peter believed intensely that the separation of Hong Kong would not work. It was quite a debate. I was thinking, `We are guests here; should we be doing this?' He was thumping the table and he said, `But I will give you my word that if it does work I will come back and tell you so.' Of course he did go back in 1999 and told them so. Mr Speaker, you would appreciate and understand that when we talk about friendship groups that sometimes travel—and I might add we do pay our own fares—in this case we were certainly looked after admirably by the Chinese government. We were met by Zhu Rongji, who has the position of Premier of China. The first time we met him he was Deputy Premier. When we went in 1999, we were not sure we were going to meet him. We were called forward as a delegation to sit down with him. Not only did all of us meet him and participate in the conversation with him but we were there for something like an hour and a half—and this was the day before he left to go to the United States. Many of us, Peter included, said he was probably practising on us what he wanted to say when he arrived in the United States. I think we were very willing participants in that and I am sure we gave him more ammunition than he could possibly take with him when he went there.I would also like to relate about that delegation—and this is why I feel so shocked about Peter's sad passing—that we went to Tibet and on the second day I certainly succumbed to the altitude. I can tell you it was a dreadful feeling. In came Peter, not walking but jogging—I do not know whether he was trying to prove a point to Carol—and I will not say what he said I looked like because it is unparliamentary—it begins with an `s' and an `h' and an `i'—but I said, `If I look like that, I can assure you, Leader of the Delegation, that I feel even worse.' I was absolutely amazed that this man was jogging in. I do not know whether he jogged out again when the door was closed and I was feeling a whole lot worse. Needless to say, I left Tibet and waited for them back in China. He still pursued the program and went on with the rest of the delegation—and I congratulate them and admire them for that. The other thing I would like to relate in this House—and Carol would appreciate it—is that I would see this wonderful couple come jogging out in their tracksuits leaving Parliament House at night, looking very trim, taut and terrific as they were walking out, and I would ask, `Where are you going?' They would say, `We're walking back to our residence.' Many a time Peter would say, `You know, Janice, walking keeps you fit,' the implication being, `It wouldn't hurt you to do a bit.' I took the pun on many an occasion and, Peter, wherever you are now, I want to tell you I am still here.I really appreciated Peter Nugent as a man, as a person, as an individual and as a very courageous individual, and many speakers have said that. I could go on and on about some of the things that happened not only in the delegation but also in the Chinese friendship group, and I was particularly proud when Peter was the chairman and I was the vice-chairman this last time. I would also mention that he defended our honour again in the embassy here in Canberra. We had organised last year a perpetual trophy for table tennis or ping-pong or whatever you want to call it. One of my colleagues (Judi, I will not mention your name) defended brilliantly—I had to keep the ball in while she was hitting it out—but it was a draw. It was a draw between our delegation members playing that night and the Chinese group. It all came down to a play-off between the ambassador and Peter, our chairman. Many of us waited with bated breath, but he did us proud and we won. He defeated the ambassador and it was certainly a proud moment. This was a way in which he could express at times to dignitaries the feelings of the parliament and his as a parliamentarian but at the same time cement a relationship, because he was a very warm and a very caring human being.I would also like to put on record, while we talk about caring and being credible, that Carol and he just worked so well together. It is just so obvious not only when you see people working in an environment together but also when you mix with them on a social occasion or when you travel with them. They were certainly a very devoted couple. Carol, you will not mind me saying that he delighted so very much in your company. He loved his family and was very, very proud of it, and that is why Ivo and I say to Carol and to the family, whom I have not met, that we truly loved your father. He was a wonderful, kind human being. My husband and I send our condolences to you and to the staff as well; they are going to feel it.He was very respected, as people have said, by indigenous Australians. In fact, a human rights council spokesman said when he died that he was a true Australian voice of conscience. Within his party, as many have said, he was classified as a moderate. He was forthright and yet he was courteous at all times. He did oppose Pauline Hanson and mandatory sentencing, but he supported immigration and reconciliation. He opposed detention centres for asylum seekers and he called for a national apology to Aborigines for past child removal policies. He always believed that the majority had the numbers to defend themselves while the minorities were the ones that needed our help because they did not have the strength or the numbers to defend themselves. Again I say: Peter, wherever you are, rest well. I know you have that place organised and you will have it as spick and span as your office was, as people have mentioned, and more importantly I know they will all be organised there. Again I say to Carol that we will miss him as well and that your memories will always be there with you. I respect the condolence motion that has been moved.16:27:0026694Nehl, Garry, MPMr NEHLAE4CowperNP10—I have to say at the outset that I do not really want to speak on this motion; I would much prefer to look to my left and see Peter Nugent's smiling face there. I think that is an indication of how we will all miss him. But, since he has left us and this motion is before the House, I certainly rise to speak in support of it and to offer to Carol and all of Peter's extended family my condolences. I know that many of my National Party colleagues who will not have the opportunity of speaking to this motion want me to associate them with the sympathy and condolences that we are expressing. Peter was a very rare person. If one has listened carefully to the debate, one would know that a great many words which start with `c' have been used about him—caring, committed, conscientious, consistent and so on. He was all of those things. I feel privileged that I have had the opportunity of working with him within the parliament in several areas. Amnesty has been mentioned a lot. I am one of the vice-chairmen of the parliamentary group and I have always respected the work Peter did in Amnesty. I also respected totally his decision to resign as chairman in the particular circumstances. Between 1993 and 1996 I was Deputy Chairman of the House of Representatives Standing Committee on Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Affairs and I can tell you that Peter was a great example and I learnt a lot from him about Aboriginal affairs and about the needs of our indigenous fellow Australians. I am not going to repeat what has been said so many times, but if you worked with Peter in those areas you got to know, to acknowledge and to recognise his passion for justice. Certainly, mention has been made of his passion for human rights.China has been mentioned quite a bit. Peter was a great friend of China, and I regard myself as a great friend of China too. Many people have found it perhaps inconsistent that Peter could be Chairman of the Australia-China Parliamentary Friendship Group and also be such an amazingly strong advocate for human rights—but they are wrong. There is no inconsistency there at all. I do not know how many times Peter visited China. I have been five times. As far as I am aware, every member of this parliament who goes to China mentions human rights. I know that every time I have been I have taken the opportunity of pursuing the issues that concern us all. I know that Peter did that as well, and there is no inconsistency in that. I happen to believe that you are going to achieve more from friendly discussion than from hitting a country like China over the head with a baseball bat. Influence through friendly discussion is what Peter did and what I have tried to do.There is another trait I really admired him for. Unfortunately, a great many people in our country—and perhaps even a few in here—are of the brand of person who says, `Don't confuse me with the facts; I've already made up my mind,' and there is no way you can change their viewpoint under any circumstances. That was not Peter Nugent. The first time that I went to Tibet was in 1992. I came back with certain views which were at variance with the commonly held ideas about Tibet and the Chinese administration of it. I published a very detailed report and I put forward a private member's motion in this place. A number of my colleagues on both sides disagreed with me very much, and Peter was one of them. But once Peter had been to Tibet he changed his views, because he too had been there and seen. I know that the member for Prospect, Janice Crosio, has also changed her views. It is amazing what knowledge can do. I find that the people who are critical of what Peter may have done, of what I may have done or of what Janice Crosio may have done are those who have never been there. The point that I would like to make is that Peter never had his mind set in concrete. He was prepared to listen, to observe, to learn and to vary the attitude that he took. I think that he was a very good parliamentarian. He was a very good man, and I am going to miss him. I conclude by reading a sentence from a note from Carol to John Forrest, the National Party Chief Whip, in response to our condolences. She said:So much has been said about him, and we as a family are so proud of the achievements of his public life. He left us a wonderful legacy.Carol, we are proud of him too. He has left this parliament and Australia a wonderful legacy.16:33:0026696Burke, Anna, MPMs BURKE83SChisholmALP00—I also would like to add to the comments of those who have spoken on this condolence motion for Peter Nugent. On the day of Peter's death, I had a call from one of our local papers to ask what comment I would like to make about Peter. Whilst I did not know Peter very well, I could answer the question very easily. He was a thoroughly decent bloke. Peter was one of those characters who give this place a good name. He was a man of principle, a hardworking local member, an individual dedicated to the role of the parliament and a committed family man. I would run into Peter on numerous occasions at functions around the traps of Whitehorse, one of our local councils. Whilst Whitehorse formed only a small part of Peter's seat, he always took the time to go to these functions. Peter was a passionate Australian citizen. We were always together at numerous citizenship ceremonies, and he always spoke of his fondness for the day he took out his Australian citizenship. He always spoke about how he received his native plant and how he had watched that plant grow and flourish, like his life had in Australia. Peter often spoke on these occasions of the immense pride he had in being present when his children also became members of this great country of ours. I was pleased to see that Deirdre also made that reference at the funeral, as he was absolutely, immensely proud of that occasion.Peter's commitment to the plight of Aboriginals and his drive for reconciliation have been spoken of often. His passionate stance was well known, and he demonstrated this commitment on numerous occasions—often to his own detriment. At an evening when we were both addressing a Whitehorse friends of reconciliation group, Peter impressed the crowd immensely with his wide knowledge of Aboriginal issues and his absolute commitment to finding a resolution. I would like to read from one of our local papers:Reconciliation loses activistWurundjeri elder Joy Murphy-Wandin has talked of her sadness at the passing of Aston MP Peter Nugent and highlighted his contribution in helping Aboriginal people. `It's not been a good couple of years for us. We lost Charles Perkins and Bob Maza. Now we've lost Peter Nugent,' she said. `He had a strong passion for helping disadvantaged people. He saw that people should be acknowledged and recognised for their differences.' Ms Murphy-Wandin said she and Mr Nugent had the same aspirations for human rights. She said they could see the difficulties facing Aboriginal people. `When on traditional land he always observed protocol and showed respect,' she said.I do not think we can add any higher praise than that praise from one of our Victorian Aboriginal elders.Peter was an internationalist, as many have said. One has only to look at the speeches he made in the House of Representatives to see how important he considered foreign policy. A quick flick through his parliamentary speeches since only 1998 and you find mention of the Pacific islands, Korea, Fiji and East Timor, which he visited twice after the intervention of the peacekeeping force, as part of a parliamentary delegation. Not only did Peter show an abiding interest in the development of countries in our region but he was also keen to explore issues affecting the fate of people living in countries far from our shores—issues such as the destruction of Buddhist statues in Afghanistan, the Middle East peace process, persecution of the Baha'i community in Iran and famine and war in Ethiopia and Eritrea. Peter believed strongly in the sanctity of human rights and was never content to just sit back and accept the word of so-called voices of authority. Peter was an advocate of the oppressed whenever persecution, prejudice or conflict reared their heads. Peter's obvious interest in international affairs was coupled with a keen interest in local matters. He was able to keep on top of all the pressing issues in his electorate, while still maintaining a very studious interest in matters abroad. He maintained a dedicated balance in concerns for those near and far right up to the time of his passing.Peter's stance on human rights was well known. This and his keen interest in the region where we live have been demonstrated through his words in this House, through his actions in his electorate and through his committee work. I last saw Peter at a function at the Chinese consul's home in Melbourne where we had a dinner prior to Peter going on his last trip to China. Peter again demonstrated his friendship with China. His understanding of Chinese customs was well demonstrated through his knowledge of mai-tai. It was an unfortunate experience for me to learn what mai-tai was and Peter took great delight in demonstrating how he could toast anybody under the table. As always, Carol was by Peter's side on that occasion. Today I pass on to her my sympathies for her great loss. Peter often spoke with pride of his children and the joys and worries of his teenage stepchildren. To them I also pass on my sympathies. The parliament has lost a decent bloke who gave this place and those in it a better name. 16:38:0026697Stone, Dr Sharman, MPDr STONEEM6MurrayLPParliamentary Secretary to the Minister for the Environment and Heritage10—I also want to strongly support the remarks of all of the speakers who have gone before in offering profound sympathy to Carol and her family for what was a life too short, a life that would have been long and full of love if of course Peter had lived to the 80-plus years usually expected for Australian men. I first met Peter in 1990 when I was very keen to win preselection for the then state Labor seat of Bayswater and that was part of Peter's patch. He was very generous and straight speaking in his advice to me then. Unfortunately I did not succeed, but that was the beginning of dialogue with Peter on many things.As a number of people have said before me now, Peter will be particularly remembered for his contribution to public life in the areas of foreign affairs, human rights, indigenous affairs and immigration. I once said to Peter, `What about adding regional Australians to your list of the disadvantaged you care so much about?' He suggested his plate was full, and of course it really was full in the sense that he cared profoundly about those who could not help themselves. He was always absolutely thorough and professional in the way that he prepared his cases of advocacy, and perhaps that is why he was so effective.In particular I want to refer to Peter's contribution to indigenous affairs as a Liberal and as part of our government. I had the honour of succeeding Peter on the Council for Aboriginal Reconciliation in 1997. I remember, soon after our Prime Minister nominated me to replace Peter, I was very proud and went around to Peter and he said, `Look, here are all my files.' And he had a collection of nearly seven years of every piece of paper, every report and every interaction that had gone on in that council over those years. He was able to be absolutely thorough and full of information about what had gone on in that period of time.Peter's understanding of indigenous affairs was such that to him the symbolic aspect of reconciliation was of critical importance—the welcoming protocols and the recognition that some indigenous peoples are concerned about a treaty. But he also understood that it was a mockery and a nonsense if all they had were empty protocols—if they still had two-year-old indigenous children suffering profound deafness. Practical reconciliation—that is, the issues of housing, health, unemployment and poverty—was for him equally significant and absolutely essential. He of course played an important part in the formation of Howard government policy, which is both symbolic and practical when it comes to indigenous affairs in this country.The Council for Aboriginal Reconciliation was very difficult to belong to in terms of the energy required. It involved work on most weekends for year after year. I know the member for Banks also remembers the time commitment, energy and emotion required to work in what was for me one of the most important councils I have been associated with. As the member for Banks, one of the other reconciliation council members, said, Peter was and is profoundly missed as a past member of that council. His legacy has been one of making sure that our government has the right policies when it comes to indigenous affairs. He was very much a part of the march in both Sydney and Melbourne when with other Liberals he expressed concern for and understanding of the needs of future indigenous Australians and improved race relations in this country. My leaving parliament each night often seemed to coincide with Carol and Peter's leaving. I used to observe them in tracksuits and feel a little envious of Carol sharing so much of Peter's time since, as members of parliament, most of us have to leave our spouses and life partners behind. On the other hand, Carol has now been left with too short a time to remember Peter. We all express our sincere regret for the loss of Peter. He was an important Australian. As a member of parliament, he made a real mark, and his legacy is the policies that we now want to ensure will make a difference in the life of all Australians.16:43:0026698Irwin, Julia, MPMrs IRWIN83ZFowlerALP00—When members from one side of the House speak kindly of a member from the opposite side in a condolence motion the public could be excused for wondering how sincere those comments are. In the case of Peter Nugent and the many fine tributes paid to his memory today there should be no doubting the sincerity of those comments. Peter Nugent was a man I greatly admired and respected. Although I only knew him for a few short years, he has made a lasting impression on me and on the way I have come to understand the role of members of parliament.One of my earliest experiences with Peter came when I attended my first Amnesty International meeting. Peter chaired the meeting, which was attended by members from both sides of this chamber. At the end of the meeting Peter called for someone to help organise Amnesty International 1999 Candle Day and asked for volunteers to stay behind after the meeting. I was a little slow in getting to my feet to leave the meeting and found myself the only one left. Peter, in a very diplomatic way, looked around, saw that I was the only one there and thanked me for volunteering to help with the task.Peter's commitment to Amnesty went far beyond just being seen at meetings. My closest experience with Peter came during our visit to China and Tibet in 1999 as members of the China-Australia Friendship Group, which Peter chaired. I was able to see first-hand Peter's diplomacy skills, which were called for on several occasions. In Beijing, as has already been mentioned, we were honoured to be able to meet the Chinese Premier, Zhu Rongji. Peter's inquiries suggested that Premier Zhu would take questions on a wide range of topics, including the issue of human rights in Tibet and the status of Taiwan. So Peter put some quite sharp questions to Premier Zhu, and received, to our surprise, some frank but cordial replies. We later realised that Premier Zhu was leaving for the United States the day after our 1½ hour interview and it could be said was using Peter's questions as batting practice before facing the Washington media.Another occasion called for Peter's diplomatic skills to explain an embarrassing moment. The group was being hosted at a magnificent banquet at a secondary school in China. The school's principal, a delightful woman in her 50s, took great interest in the group and, through an interpreter, constantly questioned Peter about Australia. By the time the 15th course came around and we were waving the white flag at the banquet, a specialty came out—turtle soup. Here was a bowl of turtle soup with a whole turtle in the middle of it. It was absolutely unreal. We had the head bobbing up and down, the shell; it was incredible. One of the members of the delegation, whom I am not going to name—I am not even going to say if it was a male member or a female member—was helping to serve the soup and used an unfortunate turn of phrase when offering a piece of the turtle to one of the members of the delegation. This caused the members to break up with laughter, to the amusement of the principal, who turned to Peter and asked what we were laughing at. I had always meant to ask Peter what he told the principal. I suspect he did not give her the literal meaning of the words used, but she laughed anyway.That visit to China gave me an insight into the constructive role that backbench members can play. Peter provided an excellent role model as leader of that delegation. His understanding of human rights issues, combined with his understanding of the politics of a situation, was much to be admired. His approach to engagement rather than confrontation will, I am certain, be proved to be correct. Peter applied these same skills in addressing the issues of Aboriginal reconciliation and mandatory sentencing. Here again I am sure we will see Peter's stand on these issues to be proven correct. It seemed to me that Peter Nugent's guiding principle was that politics is the art of the possible. He saw not only the injustice in the world but also the means to overcome that injustice through political action. While Peter may not have seen the fruits of his labour in his lifetime, he can be assured that others will continue in his footsteps, and they will definitely prevail. As I began saying, Peter Nugent was a member of this parliament that I greatly admired and respected. The circumstances of his untimely death serve as a reminder to us all of the pressure that many members endure as part of their role. When I think of Peter's efforts to maintain his fitness, I too still picture Peter and Carol at about 11 o'clock or 11.15 of a night-time in their tracksuit pants setting off from the House at fast pace to walk to their Canberra accommodation. I note Peter was very proud of me and the member for Prospect because one day he actually saw us in our tracksuit pants and our sneakers.Honourable members interjecting—83ZIrwin, Julia, MPMrs IRWIN—He did! He was quite proud. He virtually clapped us when we came back. But, sadly, I never had the opportunity of telling Peter that we only ever walked around the House once, and I do not think, member for Prospect, we have done it again. But, Carol, in Peter's memory I think we will bring in our tracksuit pants and our sneakers and we will start on our exercise again. For the second time in the life of this parliament, we can see stress as the prime suspect in the loss of a fine member. To Carol and to your family, my husband, Geoff, and I extend to you our deepest sympathy in your sad loss of a wonderful man.16:49:0026699Georgiou, Petro, MPMr GEORGIOUHM5KooyongLP10—I support the condolence motion moved by the Prime Minister and supported by the Leader of the Opposition. I was deeply moved to be asked by Carol Nugent to speak at Peter's funeral service, and I would like to voice in this place the sentiments I expressed on that occasion of sadness and reflection on a life so suddenly and unexpectedly come to an end.Peter Nugent's death has taken away a husband, a father, a friend, a colleague and a parliamentarian of conscience, honour and courage. We live in a society that today is, more than ever, sceptical about its politicians, a society in which many often perceive politicians as placing partisan self-interest and partisan advantage ahead of the national interest. Yet with Peter Nugent's passing we have witnessed an outpouring of sadness and respect from people in the electorate he served so well, from his political friends and his political opponents and from the community groups and institutions that he worked with. There are many of us who may be cynical about the politician. There are few of us who can remain so when faced with an honourable man. Peter Nugent was an honourable man—a man of character, conscience and commitment.I first met Peter professionally in the late 1990s when I was state director and he was running as the candidate for Aston, and we enjoyed the somewhat frictional interaction that I think is inherent in this relationship. But Peter won the seat, and I did not really come to know him until I joined him in the parliament in the mid-1990s. Peter had seen and done many things—as an officer, as a businessman and as a migrant. He found a calling in politics because he cared deeply about people and because he believed that he could contribute something of value to his constituents and his chosen country. Peter believed that the quality of a human's life and a nation's commitment to human rights were more important than political expedience or popular gain. He saw disadvantage in human terms, not theoretical ones. The squalid conditions of Aboriginal children without clean water or sanitation, the plight of refugees, the disadvantage of minority groups—all of these troubled him deeply. Peter argued, and I use his words: Majorities, of their nature, have power. It is minorities who are always in danger of suffering disadvantage and discrimination.He believed, and I use his words again:Any civilised society has to support, and to continue to support, groups that are disadvantaged.Peter had witnessed the effects of poverty and disadvantage on Aboriginal communities and he never ceased to remind us of the true circumstance of indigenous communities and the hardships they endure. He was deeply committed to reconciliation and to the character of our nation. He said:We will never be able to truly celebrate until we can say we have delivered a united Australia which respects this land of ours, values the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander heritage, and provides justice and equity for all.Peter abhorred those who cynically tried to deny the fact of Aboriginal disadvantage. He saw these denials as an affront not only to his own sense of decency but to that of the electorate that he represented. As he declared in this House in his seminal speech on the member for Oxley's speech:I will challenge them and I will rebut them at every opportunity because I believe that is one of the reasons why my electorate sent me here.Peter was unremittingly courageous in the pursuit of social justice. He made the most of the opportunities he had to make a difference and he was proud of the impact that he had in the parliament, on his committees and in the party room. I still remember him telling me after he had once again made a difference that he had never been prouder as a member of parliament than when he took his stand opposing mandatory sentencing of juveniles in the Northern Territory.It has often been remarked that Peter had a strong personal following in his electorate of Aston. I believe his constituents saw Peter for what he was and understood what he believed in, and they admired him for it. Peter Nugent was an honourable and decent parliamentarian who saw suffering and disadvantage and worked for justice and equity. His were the politics of compassion, not opportunism. He was a true Liberal in every sense, and he understood the rights and obligations that the party's traditions imposed. His death means that Australia has lost a voice against poverty and disadvantage. The Liberal Party has lost a respected colleague. The people of Aston have lost an honourable representative. I and many others have lost a valued friend. Carol and Peter's family have lost a good man, father and husband. Our hearts go out to them.16:55:0026700Roxon, Nicola, MPMs ROXON83KGellibrandALP00—I rise to speak on this condolence motion and to add my sympathies to Carol, the family and staff. I intend to speak only briefly, given that so many members have already said so much about Peter and his work, but I have a particular reason for wanting to speak, that being that we share a birthday. Whilst a birthday shared 29 or 30 years apart may not be seen as something that is very important, when you are a politician and your birthday is April Fool's Day, believe me, you cling to the fact that someone on the other side of the House also has this birthday. I want to add that as one of the many reasons that people in this House are expressing their compassion and concern today about the sad event of Peter Nugent's death.Like many others, I also want to tell a brief story about my encounters, if you like, with Peter. The member for Hindmarsh said that she did not want to paint the former member for Aston as a saint, and she described him as a patriarch, but not sexist. I think Carol will enjoy the retelling of a story I have which clearly places Peter in the patriarch category and also highlights the order with which he thinks of things, which many other speakers have already described.The story is from the delegation to China that so many members have spoken of. I was a very late addition to this delegation when another member was unable to attend. As I was a new member, a young member and an opposition member, it was very clear that in Peter's hierarchy—and probably everybody else's—I was fairly low down the scale on this trip to China. Peter was a very diligent delegation leader and felt that, when we were in formal meetings, it was important to introduce each of the members of our delegation and describe them in some detail. Having a little story of interest about each of them as he introduced them was his style to give a bit of colour to the delegation. There certainly was plenty of colour on that delegation by the time he had introduced the member for Prospect, the member for La Trobe, the member for Moreton, the member for Pearce and many others. By the time he got to me, it was a little difficult to think of something new and interesting to say. Much to my horror, he introduced me as coming to China to find myself a husband! Not only was I shocked then but I was more shocked when, after the meeting, I was promptly handed cards by all the Chinese delegates and not left in peace. I am sad to say that Peter was not successful in his work, Carol. I am not using this as an opportunity to seek any offers, I might say, but I did think that was a story that was worth telling. Peter took it in a very good-natured way when I pointed out that perhaps that was not the most appropriate way for me to be introduced at future meetings. That encouraged him to do it several times more, but he did, nevertheless, take my gentle chastisement very well.I did not realise the skills Peter had until I was in the position later of leading a delegation. Whilst many other people have lost a close friend, something I will carry with me in my future parliamentary career is knowing the importance, as a leader of a delegation and as a parliamentarian, of respecting that we represent the whole country when we travel overseas. Peter was very good at putting aside the partisan tensions that may sometimes occur. For those of us like me who perhaps did not share the views a number of others have expressed about the developments in Tibet, he was very tolerant in allowing us to ask questions and express our views, as we felt was important. He was very patient in the way he did that and he showed great dignity. That is something that many of us have obviously learnt from and will be able to continue to use in our future careers. I want to place that on the record and also pass on my condolences.17:00:0026701Ronaldson, Michael, MPMr RONALDSONXT4BallaratLP10—To Carol, Deirdre and Ian, Barry and Mandy, Christopher, David, and Judy and Sandra, Carol's good mates as well as work colleagues, a lot has been said about Peter today and I will not go over his history, but I do want to talk about a couple of things. I, like the member for La Trobe and others in the chamber, was part of that great class of 1990 which generated with it extraordinary excitement. There was a large group from Victoria; we had worked very closely during 1989 to get to that position. The member for Kooyong was the state director. While we were a difficult group, we were a group that was on a mission. As Carol knows, and as has been said before, no-one wants to paint Peter as a saint. Peter had his weaknesses and his strengths, like all of us. What we are doing today is not just celebrating Peter's life as a parliamentarian but actually celebrating parliament itself. Peter was a proud man: he was proud of his family and his electorate and he was extremely proud to be a member of this House. What we are celebrating today, as well as Peter, is that this House provides a unique opportunity for a very small group of people to express their true beliefs and to pursue the passions that they have. The difference between some members is not so much their commitment to the job or to their electorate but how far they pursue those opportunities that are presented to them. Peter Nugent took every single opportunity that this place presented. He was deeply committed to social causes. He was committed to a wide range of things and he used this unique opportunity to pursue them 110 per cent. Carol and the family can be proud of that. He was proud to be a parliamentarian. He was proud to be a member of the Liberal Party, and he was proud of the fact that we do have a broad church. That was something that he worked within, and he worked very hard to maintain that broad church and to provide the opportunities for others to work within that broad church. Some things have been said about what might or might not have been for Peter. The first thing I should say is that I actually thought I was friends with Bob Charles between 1990 and 1996, but obviously I was not. It was a large group that came in from Victoria in 1990 and, yes, the opportunities did not come Peter's way and the way of others from Victoria, but that was a fact of life and it was nothing to do with anything else except the state we were from. We were proud of the fact that we had cabinet and other ministers from Victoria. There were simply no places there. Let us be very careful about how we describe Peter's failure to become a minister. Peter Nugent did not become a minister for any reason other than the state he was from. I have said quite publicly that he would have made a damn good minister, and everyone in this chamber knows that, but the opportunity just did not come his way. He was, like so many of us, not at the right place at the right time. But, as Bob said, that was not an issue that preoccupied Peter at all.We were also part of the QF654 group, as is the member for Kooyong and others in the chamber, that used to catch the 7.15 flight—the PM is giving me an incredulous look—from Melbourne to Canberra. Peter and I caught that every year for 11½ years. Sometimes we would talk politics; sometimes we talked other things. Carol was there. I would like to give great credit to Carol. People have talked about Peter's tracksuit—I can tell you that the tracksuit he used to wear before he met Carol was an utter disgrace. You did everyone a great favour, Carol, by getting rid of that grotty old thing he used to wander around in and replacing it with something far more elegant. Someone was talking about `being up the back' and whether up the back is the right place to be or whether it is down the front, but the members for Macquarie, Curtin and Sturt within earshot would have heard the— how can I put this?—somewhat age challenged members for Aston and Fairfax, who maintained a running commentary from up the back here from the minute we sat down for two o'clock question time until whatever time it might finish. They have been, quite unfairly—I don't think it came from me; perhaps it did—likened to those two gentlemen in The Muppets who sit up in the balcony providing running commentary. And I knew, as soon as I heard Peter say `Ronno', that he was not inquiring as to my health or the health of the member beside me but that he had something that he thought needed attending to during question time. I do not think Peter's mind ever stopped working—whether it was the running commentary here or the work he did in his electorate. Let me tell you, when he talked, family was always number one, but second was always that electorate of his. We all try to be the most parochial in this place, but Peter was genuinely proud of those people he represented. The only good thing—and I mean the only good thing—that came out of that event a couple of weeks ago was to hear, especially in the morning but also in the afternoon, the radio jockeys talking about the contribution that members of this place make. It forced those radio jockeys to focus on the demands of this job. The talk about Peter, certainly on Melbourne radio, was generated predominantly by two constituents who rang in to 3LO, I think, at about 10.30 in the morning to talk about Peter Nugent and what he had done. For the rest of the day Peter's contribution was put in the context of what most other members of this House do as well. We ourselves sometimes forget that we should be celebrating the opportunities we have and celebrating the likes of Peter Nugent. He maximised his opportunities. The challenge for all of us, in looking at Peter's life, especially as a parliamentarian, is to seize the chance that we have and to do as he did: to make sure that every waking hour we have we maximise the opportunities we are given. Peter Nugent will be remembered for a long time. He will be remembered for maximising those opportunities. He will be remembered by his electorate. Like the situation of the schoolyard bully and a kid coming up and saying, `I don't like you doing that,' leadership is often about making the hard decisions and making the tough calls, and Peter was never afraid to tackle the bully in the schoolyard and say that he did not think something was appropriate behaviour. He was a great bloke and a terrific parliamentarian, and he will be very much missed. 17:08:0026703O'Keefe, Neil, MPMr O'KEEFECE4BurkeALP00—I would like to add some comments in support of the motion moved by the Prime Minister and supported by the Leader of the Opposition. When driving to the other side of the city to attend the service at the Waverley Christian Centre in Wantirna South, I thought, `Why am I going, apart from the fact that I knew Peter as a person and had met Carol from time to time?' For what it is worth, I think one of the most significant things that can be said about you in this place is that you have the respect of both sides of the House, irrespective of your political party or process. I thought it was important not only for Carol and the family but also for Peter's colleagues, who were deep in their own emotions about this event, to know that many of us on this side of the House deeply respected Peter as a politician and as a person, in the way he conducted himself and the causes for which he stood. I thought it was important to be there simply to show that. I hope that everyone who was present at the very moving celebration of Peter's life and contribution drew something from the fact that he was so widely regarded and respected on both sides of the House, as has been shown by the contributions being made by members here today.I add only one small anecdote to the rich history that these comments will provide for Carol and the family. I was at Sydney airport with members of a delegation going to South America late last year—about October, I think it was—and we ran into Peter in the lounge. He was getting ready to head off to New York on yet another attempt to persuade someone at the UN to his point of view on a particular topic. I remember thinking to myself, `Here we are going off as a group with the mutual support of each other's company and here is Peter, not even with Carol in this instance, trudging off by himself to go and do the job in his own way again.' Those who have done it know that jumping on a plane and flying by yourself for hours and hours to do these things is not all that pleasant. I thought to myself, `When does he ever give up?' It is obvious that he didn't until it gave up on him. The respect in which he was held on both sides of the House is something which is important for Carol and the family to know, and I wanted to say a few words simply to reflect that unequivocally for you.17:12:0026703Pyne, Chris, MPMr PYNE9V5SturtLP10—I would like to place on record my condolences for Carol and her family and my good wishes to them in the future. Carol and Peter were dinner companions of mine here in Canberra. We used to go out together regularly because we had so much in common and I got to know Peter and Carol very well. From 1993 onwards, I used to be a regular person in his office at the cheese, chocolate and drinks parties he had which the member for Hindmarsh talked about. What struck me very much about Peter and at the funeral at Wantirna a couple of weeks ago was that he was a very unaffected man. At that funeral it was talked about how his favourite thing to do in the whole world was to get into his tracky-daks—I think that is what they were called at the funeral—and sit back with Carol with a bottle of red wine in front of the fire and say that this was the happiest time of his life. It was reflected here in Canberra, because my other enduring memory of Carol and Peter is seeing them, as I arrived every morning, walking along in their tracksuits and going home every night. That sums up what an unaffected and unpretentious person Peter Nugent was. There was nothing about him that made you feel uneasy. He was easy company to be with. He was an easy dinner and drinks companion.I had a very high regard for Peter Nugent and for the causes with which he associated himself over his parliamentary career. Many of them were causes that I shared with him. He was very proud of the role he played in parliament over those 11 years in the areas in which he took a great interest. He was very proud of his role in indigenous affairs. He thought one of the great achievements of his political career was the six years that he had on the Council for Aboriginal Reconciliation. I know that he was sorry to give that up but was very pleased to have had the opportunity over that time to have contributed to indigenous affairs on the Council for Aboriginal Reconciliation. He was shadow minister for Aboriginal affairs in the 37th parliament. That was when we became friends for the first time, because he approached me and asked whether I would go on the House of Representatives Standing Committee on Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Affairs so that I could help them out in a policy sense as a new member of parliament. He knew that I had a keen interest in indigenous relationships. I agreed to go on that committee. When he ended his role as shadow minister for Aboriginal affairs, I offered to go off the committee for him if he wanted to go back on it. That is what happened: I gave up my position and he took the position over, because I knew how keen he would be, if he was not to be the shadow minister for Aboriginal affairs, to be on that committee. I have to say that the Aboriginal affairs committee was not a highly sought-after committee in the parliament, yet Peter Nugent regarded it with great importance and enough importance for him to go back onto that committee when he got the opportunity.I was proud to walk for reconciliation across the bridge in Sydney with him, with Carol and with a number of our colleagues. We felt like a few but happy band of coalition MPs that walked across the bridge in Sydney. We both flew from our respective cities to go to Sydney for that momentous day. I think Peter and Carol were very proud to be part of that walk across the bridge, because he believed very strongly in reconciliation. It was one of his lodestars: he believed very strongly in trying to do something for the welfare, health, education, housing and employment prospects of indigenous Australians. So he strongly supported the practical reconciliation policies of this government. But he also supported an apology for the stolen generation; he had lots to say about black deaths in custody when that was a major issue; and he opposed mandatory sentencing when that issue came up. I was proud to stand with him, as were a number of our colleagues, on that issue to do with mandatory sentencing.One of the most testing times in politics for Peter Nugent was the native title debate. From 1993 to 1998 he took a keen part in the native title debate, always trying to get the government and the people to see it from the point of view not only of the practical effects of native title in the community but also that indigenous people held the land so dear that native title was something that should not be dismissed but should be embraced and made to work. He tried very hard to help to get native title to work so that all Australians could adopt it, accept it and move forward with it.He was proud of his role in the area of foreign affairs, and he used the chairmanships of a number of committees to promote his interest in it. He was chairman of the Human Rights Subcommittee of the Joint Standing Committee of Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade; he was chairman of the foreign affairs and trade committee of the coalition back bench—I was a member of that with him—he was chairman of the Amnesty International Parliamentary Group; and he was chairman of the Australia-China Parliamentary Friendship Group. He took great delight in telling me about how he always raised issues of human rights when he went to China. He enjoyed being a burr under the saddle to the state of Israel because of his support for the Palestinian causes. He and I did not share the same view on that issue and it was always a great source of amusement to both of us that we would get arguing about the Middle East with Israel's position and the Palestinians' position. He really enjoyed niggling me about his trip to Israel and the Middle East, which the Minister for Financial Services and Regulation referred to earlier, about how he was going to lead it and how he was going with Leo McLeay and Anthony Albanese, because he knew that I thought it was a bad idea to go. He got great enjoyment out of being on a differing railway track from me on that issue, because we agreed on so many other things. He was also a great advocate of human rights in East Timor, when it was unfashionable as well as when it was fashionable. He used to give speeches about East Timor and human rights. Going back for a long time when the official government policy was really not to talk about it if we could possibly help it—not our government policy but the policy going back 20 years—Peter Nugent did not adopt that position. He would always argue for human rights in East Timor and, when it became fashionable, I think he was delighted but bemused with the rapidity of people jumping on the bandwagon in debating issues about human rights in East Timor. He was also very proud of the role he played in the party room and in the parliament. Just speaking for myself, I will miss him in the party room because I sat across the gangway from him and I used to enjoy his very precise, very correct speeches in the party room about issues that were important to him. He was very committed to protecting the disadvantaged in the community. He was committed to multiculturalism, and he argued about that in the party room. He advocated his causes. He did not just hold them; he actually went out there and advocated them. The party room is the opportunity in politics to try to move your party in the direction in which you want it to go. He was a committed Liberal, a small `l' liberal and proud to be described as such. Whether he was described as a Whig or a Deakinite liberal or whatever it was, he was very proud of that fact. He tried always in those 11½ years in parliament to move the party towards that small `l' liberal position and he used the party room to do so. Trish Worth and I were in the chamber when he responded to Pauline Hanson. He did it with great passion. It was an opportunity, and he took it, to lay down some markers about his philosophical view of the direction in which Australia should go. What is perhaps not well known is that one of the reasons he joined the Liberal Party was that he wanted to promote multiculturalism as a policy of the Liberal Party. He spent his whole career fighting for the cause of multiculturalism within the Liberal Party.He was also very proud of the fact that he was a great campaigner. He won Aston from Labor, he enjoyed beating Labor in the subsequent three elections and he was looking forward to beating Labor again at the end of the year in the general election. He got great glee out of the fact that at every election the Labor Party worked terribly hard in Aston because of its marginality. He liked the strategy and the toing-and-froing of the politics of winning a local seat, and he did it very well. He was a great model for many people because he was terribly local and terribly grass roots. Regardless of the standing of the party at any given time in the political cycle, the standing of Peter Nugent in his electorate was always particularly high. He was a very reliable person to have as a candidate in that sort of seat, because you could be sure that he would be winning or trying to win.I will miss him. He was a great friend. We supported each other in many things. We voted for each other at every opportunity we had within the party. I will miss him for that as I will miss him for many other things. On behalf of Carolyn and me, I would like to pass on my condolences to Carol. Carol is the mother of twins and, in the last six months, she has been giving us sage advice about how to manage that issue of twins. I hope that that will continue. I look forward to continuing my friendship with Carol and I will miss a great friend in Peter Nugent. 17:21:0026705Rudd, Kevin, MPMr RUDD83TGriffithALP00—My remarks will be very brief—not out of disrespect to Peter Nugent, his family or his memory, but because many of those opposite who were his party colleagues wish to contribute to this debate. My contact with Peter Nugent was through the Australia-China Parliamentary Friendship Group, of which he was president and I was a member. It is in that capacity and in a relationship in which I have had some professional involvement over many years that I would like to pay him a very specific personal and professional tribute. I think it is fair to say that in this chamber Peter Nugent was the principal parliamentary champion of the Australia-China relationship. Because of the complexity of that relationship and because of its inherent importance to Australia's long-term national interests, it is a relationship which demands having a parliamentary champion such as Peter Nugent. For Peter, China was front and centre in his calculation of our nation's long-term national interests. It was not that he was uncritical of China, as many other speakers have noted in this debate. He was a consistent critic of China's human rights policy and performance. At the same time, he was a consistent and eloquent advocate that the only effective means, long-term, of ameliorating China's human rights performance was through a policy of global, regional and national engagement of China. He did not always get it right—none of us do—but his contribution was of great note. He gave his commitment to China practical effect through, as noted by other speakers, his chairmanship of the government's policy committee on foreign affairs, defence and trade, his chairmanship of the friendship group, his leadership of many delegations to China and his gracious hosting of many Chinese delegations here.He grasped one thing in particular that I would like to make note of here—that is, for those of us who are concerned about China's long-term democratisation, the central potential role of the National People's Congress of China, China's parliament. He saw it, in his many conversations with me, as a potential vehicle for long-term political change in that country, as it has been in many other countries which have undergone political transformation in Eastern Europe and elsewhere. He therefore saw it as front and centre in terms of our responsibilities in this parliament to take our engagements of the NPCC seriously—something which he reflected in his work here. For that, for his contribution to what is the most important relationship for this country in terms of its long-term foreign policy interests in this region, I would like to pay tribute both at a personal and a professional level.17:24:0026706Barresi, Phillip, MPMr BARRESIZJ6DeakinLP10—I would like to join my colleagues on both sides of the House in supporting the condolence motion moved by the Prime Minister in respect of my colleague and electoral neighbour, Peter Nugent. At the same time, I offer my sincere condolences to Carol and her family. His passing away early in the morning of Tuesday, 24 April came as a shock to all of us. I know that the people of Aston and supporters of Peter were extremely saddened by his sudden death. I received a phone call at 6.30 that morning from a state colleague which left me in a state of shock for some time. Knowing the fitness regime that Peter put himself through, I should have thought he was one of the last people who would have passed away in the manner that he did.Many in this House had come to know Peter as a colleague and friend since his election in 1990. I knew Peter for a relatively short time—since my preselection in October 1994—but I have particularly fond memories of my initial encounter with him. As many would know, I won preselection from a sitting member. That does not always endear you to the supporters and friends of the deposed member. But, from the very first day, Peter stretched out his hand of friendship and support. He took me into the confines of his immaculate office and introduced me to his staff. He acquainted me with the office and the procedures of the office and then proceeded to give me some wise counsel on how to go about my campaign. He did so not in a gratuitous fashion but in a fatherly, mentoring type manner. He gave me every encouragement and support where possible. That mentoring role, while less prevalent in later years, nevertheless continued as we represented communities and shared a common border—areas such as Ringwood, Bayswater, Heathmont and Vermont.There are a number of things which I initiated in my electorate on becoming a member which I have taken on from Peter. One of them, which often brought us into contact with each other, was a citizenship award which is given to one student in every school. In my case it is called the Deakin Shield and in Peter's the Aston Shield. He would get up in front of the students and speak with great pride about Tilly Aston and her work. I am sure that in years to come subsequent members for Aston will speak with great fondness about the work of Peter Nugent in his electorate. Causes on which we had similar views included the Scoresby transport corridor, the republic and mandatory sentencing. All of these issues featured prominently in our discussions. Peter often exhibited much more passion on these issues than you would normally find in a member of parliament. I will not go through the various social issues, which have already been spoken about, of which Peter was a champion. One event in particular made me realise where his passion came from. It was when Peter, the member for Chisholm and I attended a meeting of the Whitehorse Friends for Reconciliation as guest speakers. Peter was able to speak with experience, knowledge, integrity and, above all, conviction on issues such as Mabo, stolen children, reconciliation, mandatory sentencing and, of course, the rise of One Nation. He was able to draw on his considerable experience and the friendships he had formed during his days as a shadow minister for Aboriginal affairs.Peter was very proud of his time on the shadow front bench. More importantly, he cherished and was proud of the friends he made during that time on the front bench and subsequently during his seven years as the government representative on the Council for Aboriginal Reconciliation. Peter has been described as the social conscience of the Liberal Party. He would be embarrassed at being singled out, but he would be proud to be one of the strong voices within the party on such issues. The party—the government—is poorer for his passing.The Deputy Prime Minister has already referred to Peter's role as a champion of the Scoresby Transport Corridor. I wish to talk about that for a moment, because it was a grassroots electorate issue as opposed to a lot of the national issues which many other members have spoken about. He fought the lonely fight to get the Scoresby Transport Corridor or the eastern ring road built from Ringwood in my electorate to Frankston—long before many of us entered parliament. He once said to me at a time when he felt the cause might have been lost, `It probably won't be built in my lifetime as a member of parliament'—sadly prophetic words now; but he did expect its announcement during this parliament. That he passed away three weeks before the Prime Minister's announcement is unfortunately one of those political injustices that often take place. I certainly urge the state government, at a time closer to the construction and at a time when it may not be seen as cheap, political opportunism, to consider honouring Peter's work in getting the Scoresby Transport Corridor built by naming part of that corridor in honour of Peter. I suggest this to Minister Batchelor as not only a way of honouring Peter but, if he wants to look at personal political gain, maybe also a way for Minister Batchelor to redeem his name in the eastern suburbs of Melbourne.Peter's passing is such that I will miss his advice and his robust contribution in the party room and at our periodic marginal seats meetings down in Melbourne. Peter's legacy for me is that you have only a short time in this place and you must stand up for what you believe in and, if you do not do that, you will be remembered as someone who stood for nothing. Peter was one of those rare politicians who found a way to balance and accommodate loyalty to the party while being true to his own beliefs—a salient lesson for newcomers such as me. To Carol and to Peter's children and grandchildren, and to his staff, Judy and Sandra: on behalf of the people of Deakin and my family, I offer you my sincerest condolences.17:31:0026707Adams, Dick, MPMr ADAMSBV5LyonsALP00—I would like to associate myself and my partner Dee with these condolences to Carol and Peter's broader family. I got to know Peter and Carol on a delegation trip in 1997. I served with Peter on no parliamentary committees but on the Amnesty International group. Peter was very strong on human rights issues, and I remember the meetings we had on that delegation—especially to do with refugees from Burma coming into Thailand—and his pointed questions, always sharp and to the point. That was a long delegation, I remember, and I had the honour of being the deputy leader of that group. Once or twice our leader took ill, and I was thrust into the leadership position. I remember once that it was late—and I thought Peter was always pretty good with his advice, and it has been mentioned by his colleagues that he was never backward in giving advice—and it was all getting pretty prickly towards the end of that trip. It was a three-week delegation, and we were in the top end of Thailand. We had hosted a farewell dinner to those who had assisted us and the drivers, and the people from the parliament of Thailand.I then suggested, because I was the leader, that we might need some more relaxation and I led the delegation around the corner to a massage area of the town and suggested that we would all do better if we had a good massage and got rid of some of the tensions within us. Of course, Thai massage is where you are massaged with your clothes on, and they can give you some pyjamas to put on. Peter was a pretty intense sort of guy, and I remember us all getting there and lying on the floor on the mats to get pulled around. I remember the squeaks and the cries that came out from everybody in the area. I think we were all very much more relaxed and comfortable when we left that area and went back to our accommodation.Peter was a great guy to travel with, along with Carol. His intensity, his belief in what he stood for, was always there and he raised his beliefs with great strength. He fought those battles and, as we have heard today, he fought them within his party room. There is a lot more to being a member of this House than actually sitting on the front bench: there are all those battles that we know about and that we all fight, and evidently Peter fought those battles with great dedication. He was a very decent bloke, and his family can be very, very proud of him, and I wish them all well in the future without him.17:34:0026708Billson, Bruce, MPMr BILLSON1K6DunkleyLP10—I rise tonight to briefly add my remarks to the condolence motion and to pass on my regards and Tina's to Carol and the family for the loss of a special man and a loved one in their lives. Peter was a very decent and honourable man, and someone I admired and respected a great deal and learnt a great deal from. He had been around, doing what we do here, much longer than many people here and he taught some of us, particularly in the class of 1996, how to make a contribution.I particularly want to talk about his role in the party room. I learnt much from Peter about how to put a point and how to exhaust and exercise those internal processes—because above all, while he was a very independent thinker, he was a Liberal Party person to his bootstraps. He loved the party and he worked as a great team player and showed all of us that you can make a point and drive home something that you hold dear, within the structures of the party; and he exercised and exhausted those avenues, much to my respect and admiration. I remember the way that he brought about opportunities for all of us to make a contribution. I remember when he encouraged the Prime Minister to conduct a foreign affairs workshop where we did nothing else in a party room meeting but talk about ideas about foreign affairs and to inject that input into the government's agenda. That was another example of Peter's work.Many people remember him as an intense, serious character. I have to tell you that I had a date with Peter Nugent for three hours every Tuesday when parliament was sitting. We have heard about the Muppets analogy and the commentary in the parliament. I was actually in Peter's neighbourhood in the party room, and he was an absolutely hysterically funny human being. He was constantly giving us his thoughts and input to that small group that sat around him—the member for Hindmarsh and the member for North Sydney; we were one seat removed from him in the party room—and his insights, the clarity of his thinking, his interjections and commentary on what was discussed in the party room showed a man of great intellect and also a man of great humour and someone who was extremely consistent. He was the one who would share with us the irony of someone's remarks in that particular party room meeting and contrast them with those made a number of months earlier. He was the guy that pointed out when there was a vacancy on the front bench—albeit a regrettable vacancy—and we would caucus to work out who got the brown nose award in those opening remarks in the party room, where praise was being heaped on the leader. We had a great time in the party room. It was a great opportunity to share ideas, and that is where I got to know Peter Nugent. Tina and I did not socialise to any great extent with Carol and him; but just spending that three hours in every party room meeting near him, actually sitting in front of him and taking in his thoughts on things, gave me a terrific insight into some of his thinking. I just want to talk briefly, given that the time is limited and there are others that wish to speak. He was the father of Scoresby in this parliament. He has been on that for 10 years and, as the member for Deakin mentioned, that deserves to be recognised. For what it is worth, that high street road overpass has got `Nugent Bridge' written all over it. We need to recognise his 10-year campaign there. It was quite funny. He was on that for a long time, and I think he used to enjoy occasionally winding up a couple of us—the newer chums on the block—to go and do all the hackwork and things like that. He was very stoic and statesmanlike, and we would organise a delegation to the Prime Minister. We would get all that organised, and Carol and I would probably tick-tack on timetables and things like that, but we knew that we had to lead with Peter, as the father of Scoresby, and he would be putting that point very wisely. They were good days. And that time on Mother's Day just a few weeks ago was a very special day, and I think that high street road overpass has got `Nugent Bridge' written all over it. He stayed with that issue for 10 years, and I just want to briefly relate that with how humanitarianism was at his soul and heart and with how he respected the individual dignity of all people. He was always there on that subject and he was always being heard on that.I think all of us in public life feel that those human rights issues are a part of what we are here to do, but some of us come forward when there is an event that strikes a chord with us or when there is an issue that concerns us. Peter Nugent never left that stage. He never needed a chord to be struck with him. He was always there on that issue. It did not require an event to prompt his input; he was always there. I would say that, for many of us, he was in fact the chord. His comments at times prompted others to come forward and talk about human rights. He was the conscience of many others in that respect, and I admire him greatly for that.My final comment is that I share his view that our time in this place is a rare opportunity to do some good for our nation and its people. Peter grasped that opportunity with both hands. He brought to his work the energy and enthusiasm of someone much younger. He brought the wisdom and insight of a travelled and worldly individual, and he brought the courage and drive of an individual of purpose and conviction. Peter Nugent was a good man. I learnt a lot from him. We respect him greatly. He was a member who did a lot of good things for his nation, and he took the opportunity of being a member of parliament very seriously and, boy, he used that time to great effect, and we are going to miss him. Carol, all the best to you and the family for the future.17:40:0026709Bailey, Fran, MPFRAN BAILEYJT4McEwenLP10—I too rise in support of the Prime Minister's motion of condolence today, and I will be brief in my remarks. Not everyone who enters this place earns the respect of their colleagues on both sides of the House, but Peter Nugent did. Carol and his family listening to the remarks of every speaker here today will learn of course what they have always known about Peter the man—that he was passionate about issues and that he pursued those issues with great determination, with great commitment and, frequently, with great courage. I unfortunately did not sit near Peter either in the House or in the party room, so I did not hear a lot of the examples of humour that my colleagues have spoken about, but I was privileged to travel to China on two occasions as part of the Australia-China Parliamentary Friendship Group. I saw at first hand the determination with which Peter pursued his passion certainly for human rights. I watched as part of that delegation as he pursued in particular the subjects of human rights and the future of Tibet in two meetings with Zhu Rongji. As well as pursuing those subjects with great vigour and great forcefulness, he also did it with a degree of great courtesy. I think that was a lesson to all of the members of that delegation who had not been on a delegation visit before or been part of a parliamentary friendship group—that those issues that we do feel passionate about can be dealt with with a degree of courtesy to those we are questioning. In Peter's case, he did it with particularly forensic skill.The reputation that Peter has earned—that has been spoken about here today—went way beyond the boundaries of this place. His other great passion, apart from those issues that many have spoken about, was his electorate of Aston. On the day that the public announcement was made of the very tragic and shock passing of Peter, radio stations 3LO and 3AW in Melbourne both received spontaneous calls from members of his electorate, talking about how they regarded Peter and what he had done for them. Whether or not they were political supporters of his, there was a spontaneous outpouring of gratitude and respect for Peter Nugent the man. What came through was what many speakers have said here today—the very decent Peter Nugent, the very committed Peter Nugent and the very determined Peter Nugent. His passing is really felt by everyone in this chamber. His passing is a sad loss for this parliament. To Carol, in particular, and to all of Peter's family, I would like to pass on my respect and my condolences to you. We all miss a very real parliamentarian in the true sense of the word, and we all miss a true friend.17:44:0026710Baird, Bruce, MPMr BAIRDMP6CookLP10—I would like to join the other members of the House in expressing my condolences to Carol and the family in the loss of Peter. I have only known Peter since I became the member for Cook in this House 2½ years ago. Early in my time here he invited me to join the Human Rights Subcommittee of the Joint Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade. I do not know whether he invited me to join because he knew that I shared a number of his views on life or whether he needed the numbers to get certain issues through, but he certainly was an excellent role model. He was, as has been said by others, a man of great passion, integrity and honesty and a man who had a firm belief in those issues which he saw as important in today's world.The Human Rights Subcommittee have undertaken several studies. The first was in relation to religious freedom and the second was concerned with detention centres. The report on detention centres has just been completed and was due to be sent to him on the Monday he passed away. Since that time we have been working on the report and the subcommittee has met to finalise it. It is an outstanding report and we look forward to its presentation in this parliament. We had planned to work with Peter following the celebrations in Melbourne on the Friday. We were all going to get together and work through it. His sense of integrity, compassion and fair play was obvious and his views on human rights were evident on International Human Rights Day in December 1996 when he said:The pursuit of human rights is a matter of great importance for Australians. It is one of our defining characteristics, expressed colloquially as the `fair go' philosophy.He had a great compassion in listening to people. When we were visiting the detention centres he listened intently to what people had to say—he did not hurry them through. He worked us very hard: we left Canberra on one of the visits at 5.45 a.m., flew to Curtin, had three sessions with the 25 detainees in each that lasted for an hour and a half and then we flew to Port Hedland. We had lunch at about 3 o'clock, worked right through and finished at 11 o'clock Sydney time. This continued the following day. His commitment was perhaps a little more than the other members on the committee, but we certainly admired him for it. In fact, when you contrast Peter's contribution with what many of the community think is the role of parliamentarians, I think it is important that we do hold him up as a model. I followed him as chairman of the Amnesty International group, where his impact was obvious. I invited him, as Chairman of the Australia-China Parliamentary Friendship Group, to meet with the Chairman of the Beijing Olympic Committee bid team, who was coming down to Sydney when I had been asked if I could put together what was the former bid team for Sydney. Even though it was on a Saturday night on the second day of the Olympics, Peter flew up to be with the group and, as you would expect, exemplified the blending of his strong interest in China with his interest in human rights. The Minister for Finance and Administration was also involved in that particular dinner. As we went through the various reasons why Sydney had won the bid, Peter was first to comment, `If you really want to win the bid, think of the human rights dimensions of bringing forward your requirements to the International Olympic Committee.' I was very impressed. Similarly, when we were on a harbour cruise—and I think that the member for Chifley was there as well—with an overseas delegation involved in human rights, we spent about three hours on the boat debating what they were doing in relation to those who were claiming amnesty in other countries and what we could learn from those groups.His interest in Aboriginal affairs was strong as well. He made a speech on Aboriginal education and said: The thing that we must do, as a nation and as a parliament—the lead has to come from the parliament—is to put aside party political differences in these sorts of areas. Those of us who have worked in indigenous affairs over the last few years have tried to put aside a lot of those party political differences because, as a nation, we have responsibility not to fail our citizens. In so many areas, including Aboriginal education, we have failed them in the past ...His speech was so good that I distributed copies of it to a group of young people in our community to show them the intensity of interest that is given within this parliament to the question of indigenous rights. I also joined him on the march across the Sydney Harbour Bridge and witnessed his pride in being involved in the issue.He was always concerned about the disadvantaged and human rights. He showed great patience with the various delegations he was involved with. He was a man that certainly took the road less travelled but his character, integrity and honesty remained. Veronica Brady, when she was giving her eulogy at Judith Wright's funeral, said:In the long run, history is governed by people with an overarching vision—a vision that gives shape and meaning to life by relating our venture as human beings to the larger destiny of the universe. It has to do with pain as well as joy, with death, with sorrow, with mercy, compassion, forgiveness, with rediscovering community with one another, with the earth—understanding that the history which matters is not the history of winners but the history of losers.Peter Nugent was such a person. To Carol and the family, you had an outstanding family member, of whom we are all very proud in this place. We will long remember him.17:51:0026711Moylan, Judi, MPMrs MOYLAN4V5PearceLP10—The late member for Aston was a very fine colleague and he was a good friend. Peter Nugent gave exceptional service to this parliament, to his constituency of Aston and to the Liberal Party. I suspect that his influence will live on for a very long time. There seemed to me to be a very common thread through the work of Peter Nugent in his parliamentary life—and that is the time during which I knew him. It did not matter whether it was in indigenous affairs, whether it was fighting for human rights, whether indeed it was his engagement with the international community or whether it was fighting for small business and looking after the interests of small business, Peter Nugent was totally committed to providing a voice for those who struggled to be heard in our communities. I think that was the real contribution that Peter made: to make sure that those people were heard. He was totally committed to what he believed in, he was courageous, he was meticulous in attention to detail and he was passionate in what he believed. I had the great privilege and pleasure of serving with Peter on the Human Rights Subcommittee of the Joint Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade when he was chair. I also had the privilege of travelling with him on the trip to China that has been mentioned. I will not say any more about that except that Peter was an exceptional leader on those trips. We felt proud of the way he conducted himself, and he was always fair and helpful to members of the delegation. We enjoyed the experience immensely. A lot has been said about Peter's relationship with people from China, his commitment to that delegation, and also his commitment to human rights. One of the things I discovered about Peter was that I never found him to be judgmental in any way. He had a great understanding of the tremendous challenge faced by the Chinese government in managing a population of 1.3 billion and also of a history that has been difficult for that country. Although he was extremely strong on the human rights issue and fearless in asking questions on those visits to China, he always maintained a deep respect, which was felt by the Chinese. I know that he was respected by the people in the embassy here and by the Chinese people he had a relationship with overseas. I am sure that he is going to be sadly missed in that role. Peter had a sense of humour and a sense of mischief. We heard from the member for Prospect about the famous ping-pong contest. Peter managed to get the ambassador to extend an invitation to the whole Australia-China Parliamentary Friendship Group to go to the embassy and have this match. We all sucked in our breath when he challenged the ambassador to a game of table tennis—and won. He had that sense of mischief and he really enjoyed that experience. I am sure it went a long way to continuing to build on the friendship with China. In the time I have been here, no-one in this parliament has worked harder than Peter Nugent to build on that relationship between Australia and China.I have a great respect for Peter. I will always feel that respect and affection for Peter and Carol, who worked tirelessly together and who were always a great partnership. Peter has left a great legacy; the family can be very proud of his commitment to his work in this place and that he really stood for something. I extend my deep sympathy to Carol, to the family, to Peter's close friends and to his staff. 17:55:0026712Hawker, David, MPMr HAWKER8H4WannonLP10—I would like to also support the Prime Minister's motion, which was supported by the Leader of the Opposition and 34 other members from both government and opposition. On 24 April, we lost a fine Australian, a fine parliamentarian and a fine local member. Peter Nugent was also a devoted husband, father and family man. Anyone who heard his daughter, Deirdre Morella, at the funeral would have realised the depth of feeling that the family had towards Peter and the fondness and the loss that they feel. Likewise, the words from the Prime Minister, from the member for Kooyong and from Damien Farrell filled out the richness of the life of Peter Nugent. I first met Peter in 1989 at a preselection for the seat of Aston. It was a curious preselection because the preselectors decided not to proceed to a vote. Notwithstanding that, one candidate there went on to become a member of federal parliament, and still is a member of federal parliament. However, when the preselection was reopened, Peter Nugent's name had been moved from chairman to candidate. He went on to win the preselection, to win and hold the seat, and to demonstrate what a fine local member he was.Much has been said about Peter. He was very well organised, he was a man of honour, he was very candid and he was a very decent man. But one of the things that should also be said is that he could be relied upon whenever he was needed. I remember a recent experience with the Joint Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade when Peter was acting as chairman of the committee. I chair the Defence Subcommittee, and Peter was willing to come along to every meeting and be there for the whole of each meeting to make sure that all procedures were properly observed. Much has been made about Peter's commitment to international relations and his work as chairman of the Human Rights Subcommittee of the joint standing committee, his involvement in Amnesty, his chairmanship of the Joint Committee on the National Crime Authority and his interest in China. It is also important to note that he chaired not only the Australia-China Parliamentary Friendship Group but also the Australia-Singapore Parliamentary Friendship Group and the Australia-Malaysia Parliamentary Friendship Group. I come back to the importance that Peter placed on his family and repeat the words of the Treasurer: In the years to come, they—his family—will have the satisfaction, like all those who knew and loved Peter Nugent, that he lived a life of purpose and achievement and he made a difference. I too would like to extend my sympathy to Carol and all members of the family. We have lost a fine Australian, but on this sad occasion we have nonetheless some very great reasons to feel pride in the achievements of Peter Nugent.17:59:0026713Price, Roger, MPMr PRICEQI4ChifleyALP00—When you say you are sad and sorry about someone's passing, you feel a bit embarrassed because you realise it is only a fraction of what the family have gone through. I have got to know Peter through the Human Rights Subcommittee of the Joint Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade. If you want to look at a very up-front report, look at the Hong Kong report that we did. I believe that the detention centre report, which will be shortly brought down, will very much show Peter's commitment and in some ways be a fitting memorial to him. From Robyn and I, Carol and family, our sympathies. I am sorry—the Badgerys Creek advocates will be pleased to know—that my plane got delayed so I missed the funeral.Question resolved in the affirmative, honourable members standing in their places.Sitting suspended from 6.01 p.m. to 7.30 p.m.Bills26713R130426713Message from the Governor-General transmitting particulars of proposed expenditure and recommending appropriation announced.Bill presented by Mr Costello, and read a first time.2671319:31:0026713Costello, Peter, MPMr COSTELLOCT4HigginsLPTreasurer10—I move:That the bill be now read a second time.This Budget will build a stronger Australia. It begins the largest defence modernisation and upgrade program in over 25 years. It strengthens our borders in the fight against plant and animal disease. It overhauls the operation of our social welfare system. It invests in our health system, in our families, in our natural environment and in our most important resource of all—our people. And this Budget will strengthen our economy. Most of all it will cut taxes. Tax cuts will bring benefits to business, investors, the young and, especially, older Australians. This Budget will cut taxes next year by over $5 billion. And the Budget I present tonight is in surplus for the fifth consecutive year—a cash surplus of $1.5 billion.Over the last five years we have worked hard to secure the nation's finances, first to get the Government to live within its means and then to pay back Labor's debt. At the end of this budget year we will have repaid nearly $60 billion of Labor's $80 billion debt spree. As we pay off those debts—as we get the debt monkey off our back—we save on interest payments. Today the Government's interest bill is $4 billion per annum less than it was under Labor. That $4 billion of savings can be invested in better things like health and education. Mr Speaker, last year's Budget cut income tax for every Australian taxpayer. It abolished wholesale sales tax and replaced it with GST. Every last dollar of GST has been paid to the State Governments. GST now funds the salaries of their policemen on the beat. It pays the salaries of all the teachers in all the classrooms of all the state education systems.If we had not cut income tax last July a worker on average earnings would be paying a top tax rate of 43 cents per dollar today. Tax reform brought that down by a third. Today that worker on average earnings has a top tax rate no higher than 30 cents per dollar.And tax reform cut tax on transport. Without tax reform Australia's 75,000 truckies would be paying 27 cents a litre more tax on their diesel pushing up the cost of all transport.Without tax reform individuals would be paying twice as much tax on their capital gains as they are required to pay today.Further Tax CutsAnd tax reform means that from 1 July taxes can be cut further.On 1 July this year the company tax rate will be reduced again this time from 34 to 30 per cent. This will cut tax for business by around $2 billion per year.On 1 July this year Financial Institutions Duty (FID) will be abolished. This will benefit the 12 million Australians who are currently taxed when they deposit money in their bank accounts and taxed when they make payments on their credit card and taxed when they make their mortgage payments. The abolition of Financial Institutions Duty will save those individuals and other taxpayers about $1.2 billion per year.From 1 July this year state stamp duties on listed shares and other quoted securities will be abolished. They will be abolished because The New Tax System pays the money to the States to abolish them. This will save around $675 million per year for the 5.7 million Australians who hold shares and the seven million Australians who have superannuation funds invested in shares.On 1 July this year low income Australians who own shares that pay franked dividends can get a lower tax rate. They can claim a refund of the tax paid on the shares which is over and above their own personal tax. This will save them over $500 million per year in tax.On 1 July this year The Simplified Tax System will commence and allow eligible small businesses to do their tax accounting on a cash basis with simpler depreciation and trading stock rules. It will reduce tax payable by small business by over $1 billion in the first three years.And tonight, I announce further measures that will reduce taxes for business.From midnight tonight registered business will be able to claim full input tax credits on the purchase of motor vehicles. This was to be introduced from 1 July 2002, with an entitlement to half credits from 1 July 2001.But the Government has decided to pull this forward—a tax cut of over $600 million in 2001-02. This measure is taking effect from midnight tonight because the economy can benefit from it—it will stimulate investment—and because the Budget can afford it.As an example, a business that buys a $35,000 car tomorrow will pay $3,200 less in tax than it would have today. A business that buys a large interstate trucking rig with a value of $330,000 would save $30,000 in tax.This Budget also provides other tax measures of benefit to business. New capital gains tax concessions will be introduced for listed investment companies.Tax Cuts for Older AustraliansMr Speaker, tonight I am announcing measures to further cut income tax for older Australians.Before the Liberal/National Parties were elected in 1996, older Australians who had saved for their retirement and who did not receive a pension began to pay income tax once their income passed the tax free threshold of $5,400. Self-funded retirees paid more income tax than pensioners even when they had the same income.We thought that wasn't fair. So one of the first things this Government did in 1996 was to put the self-funded retiree on an equal tax footing with pensioners. It raised the tax free threshold for older Australians to $11,185, and with the introduction of the New Tax System these thresholds were increased. But tonight I announce that the Government will go much further still. We will lift the low-income aged persons rebate with effect for the current financial year—that is, backdated to 1 July 2000.The increase I am announcing tonight will mean that in the current financial year qualifying single self-funded retirees and age pensioners will have an effective tax free threshold of $20,000. They will pay no income tax unless their income (including the pension) exceeds that amount.The effective tax free threshold for a couple on equal income will be lifted to $32,612. Qualifying couples will pay no income tax until their combined income exceeds that amount.In addition, the Medicare levy threshold for senior Australians will be lifted from last year's rate of $13,550 to $20,000, so a senior Australian pays no tax and no Medicare levy until he or she earns above that amount.The combined effect of these measures and tax reform means that a senior Australian on an income of $20,000 last year paid tax of $2,688. This year they will pay nothing. Senior couples on $20,000 each last year paid tax of $6,140. This year they will pay tax of $2,179—a combined tax cut of $3,960, over $75 per week.Because these measures are to apply to the current financial year, eligible senior Australians will receive the benefit of these tax cuts by way of a tax refund as soon as they lodge this year's income tax return.Acknowledging Older AustraliansMr Speaker, the tax cuts I have announced will benefit self-funded retirees and age pensioners with additional income.I want to now announce a benefit for those on the full or part age pension. The Government has previously legislated to fix the age pension at 25 per cent of Male Total Average Weekly Earnings. On 1 July last year it increased the pension by four per cent and is maintaining it at two per cent higher in real terms. But tonight I announce an additional payment for all those who receive income support and are over age pension age, including service pensioners.The Government will pay each person who receives a pension or part pension a non-taxable lump sum of $300. After I have finished this Budget speech, the legislation to make this payment will be introduced into the House. If the payment is to be made with the fortnightly pension payment next month it needs to pass the Parliament by Thursday. Any delay by the Opposition will mean that the payment cannot be made next month. There are 2.2 million Australians eligible for this payment of $300.The Government is making this payment because the economy can benefit from it, the Budget can afford it this financial year and, most of all, our older Australians deserve it.Mr Speaker, back in January 1999 the Government dramatically widened eligibility for the Commonwealth Seniors Health Card. The card enables holders to purchase pharmaceuticals for $3.50 instead of the general rate of $21.90. After 52 prescriptions all other scripts in a calendar year are free. Back in January 1999, the income limit for eligibility for the card was raised from $21,000 to $40,000. Tonight I announce that on 1 July 2001 it will be lifted further, with an income test of $50,000 for singles and $80,000 for couples. This is expected to extend the card to an additional 50,000 older Australians.Further, older Australians who hold the Commonwealth Seniors Health Card will be extended the same concession as pensioners on telephone costs. They will be entitled to a Telephone Allowance of $17.20 per quarter from September. The Commonwealth will also open negotiations with the states with a view to extending other pensioner concessions to Health Card holders over time. For the first time the Government will also introduce twice a year indexation for those on Commonwealth superannuation pensions from 1 January 2002. This will assist those on such pensions to keep up with the cost of living.In recognition of the unique circumstances of their captivity, the Government will make a one-off, non-taxable payment of $25,000 to former Australian Prisoners of War of the Japanese. It will also be paid to civilian internees and detainees of the Japanese. For those who are no longer alive, payments will be made to their surviving spouses.Similar compensation has been made by the Governments in Britain, Canada and New Zealand to Prisoners of War of the Japanese. The Parliament will be asked to appropriate this sum before 30 June. No amount of compensation will ever make up for the pain and the loss these people suffered. But our nation should make a statement of recognition and thanks.Australians Working TogetherThis Government has begun a whole new approach to welfare and work. We have introduced mutual obligation: the obligation of the community to help those not in work and the obligation of those not in work to contribute to the community.This has led to the very successful Work for the Dole program, where eligible people on benefits put back into the community and receive the chance to do useful work which will improve their skills and help them re-enter the workforce.In this Budget the Government is making a substantial investment of $1.7 billion over 4 years to improve the way our income support system works. The object is to help those of working age move from welfare to work and to give them assistance to do so.Even though employment opportunities have improved greatly in the last 5 years, we don't want people to be left behind. We don't want people to drop out of looking for work and we don't want the system to discourage participation in the work force. The package of measures called Australians Working Together balances these objectives. It has major new incentives to take up work and reasonable requirements for people to take the opportunities on offer.The new assistance includes over $700 million to help people find jobs—more places for Job Search Training and more places in Work for the Dole. Training Credits of $800 will be introduced for people who do Work for the Dole and community work. They can use these credits to pay for training which will qualify them for better jobs. Importantly, more assistance will be provided for people over 50 who are out of work and want to re-enter the work force.A new Working Credit initiative will be introduced to allow those out of work the right to accumulate up to $1,000 of earnings without losing income support. This removes a disincentive to take intermittent jobs or short-term work which could open the door for them to get long-term employment.New requirements will be introduced to standardise arrangements for all job seekers aged up to 49. From July 2002, those not in work will receive Job Search Training after three months unemployment at the latest and will be required after six months to do community work, study or some other activity, which for those aged up to age 39 can be Work for the Dole. Parents on income support will be helped to prepare for a return to the work force as their children approach teenage years through annual interviews with Personal Advisers. From July 2003 parents whose youngest child is in high school will be required to do six hours a week of community work, part-time paid work, study or training if they are receiving parenting payment.Australians Working Together will deliver the right balance of assistance, incentives and obligations to help all Australians move forward. It will be a major overhaul of our income support system. Strengthening Australia's Health SystemThis Budget aims to improve the health and medical care of Australian families. With an additional $900 million we are enhancing Medicare, increasing health services in rural and regional Australia and introducing 5 initiatives to treat common health problems that affect Australian families.The Government is committed to maintaining and improving Medicare for the benefit of all Australians. In this Budget the Government is increasing rebates for GP services, in particular for longer consultations, which will assist the treatment of complex and chronic conditions.Second, the Government is taking direct practical measures to boost health services in rural and regional Australia.We will be providing $104 million over four years to assist GPs in rural Australia to employ practice nurses. Practice nurses can support GPs by providing a range of medical services, managing chronic disease treatment, doing health assessments and providing clinical support on minor surgery. We will fund 100 Rural Nursing scholarships of $10,000 per year. This will educate rural students at a rural campus, because rural students are more likely to end up serving patients in rural and regional Australia. An additional ten scholarships will be provided for indigenous students or Aboriginal health workers to undertake nursing education.Third, this Budget introduces 5 initiatives to address health problems which affect Australian families. It targets treatments for asthma, mental health, diabetes, cervical cancer and alcohol education and rehabilitation.Asthma affects over two million Australians, including one in four primary school children and one in seven teenagers. The Government will establish a 3 stage program for GPs to intervene early to diagnose asthma, develop a care plan and review that plan with the patient. If we treat asthma early we can minimise the risk of hospitalisation for sufferers, particularly for children. The Government will allocate $120 million over four years to improve the quality of care given by general practitioners to those suffering a mental illness. This will help them and the families who suffer with them. It will be used to educate and train GPs on mental health issues and will provide support for GPs to deliver quality mental health care. Amongst Australians over 25, 3 in 100 have diabetes and know it, 3 have it and don't know it and another 16 are likely to develop it later in life. This Budget introduces a world-class National Diabetes Program which will provide incentive payments to GPs to improve the diagnosis and management of people with diabetes. A new program will be introduced to increase screening for cervical cancer among high risk women. General practices which reach overall screening targets will receive additional funding. This is designed to identify problems early and reduce risks before it is too late.The Government will also provide $115 million over four years for a new Alcohol Education and Rehabilitation Foundation. This will help prevent alcohol and other substance abuse. Alcohol abuse is a problem that causes suffering in many families, and the Government's new measures are designed to address it.Building Australia's ResourcesIn January this year the Government released an Innovation Action Plan for the future called Backing Australia's Ability. It is a plan to build Australia's human resources, to support university research infrastructure, to invest in major national research facilities and to finance the establishment of world-class centres of excellence in biotechnology and in information and communications technology.Backing Australia's Ability will encourage R&D and commercialisation of new ideas. Backing Australia's Ability added 5,500 targeted university places over four years and tonight I announce that the Government will in addition, fund up to 1,800 undergraduate student places in regional higher education institutions from 2002. This will increase access and participation in higher education for regional Australia. In November last year the Government announced additional funding of $1.6 billion over five years to rebuild Australia's road network. The majority of the funding ($1.2 billion) is being distributed to local councils to build local roads. The remainder is being spent on the National Highway and Roads of National Importance such as the Scoresby Freeway in outer Melbourne. This investment in roads is building Australia's infrastructure.Safeguarding Australia's Natural EnvironmentIt is vital that we conserve our environment and natural resources.Environmental degradation poses a long-term threat to our quality of life, the quality of future water supplies, and the fragile environment we share as Australians.This Government established Australia's first Natural Heritage Trust of $1 billion. Tonight I announce that the Government will invest a new $1 billion to extend the Natural Heritage Trust by five years to 2006-07.This Trust is the largest ever Government investment in Australia's natural environment.It provides a long-term and comprehensive approach to the conservation of Australia's land, vegetation, biodiversity, coasts and oceans.This new investment builds on the $700 million provided over seven years for the National Action Plan for Salinity and Water Quality announced in October 2000. The National Action Plan is the first comprehensive strategy to address salinity and water quality problems in Australia.Protecting Australian AgricultureMr Speaker, we have seen the damage caused in other countries by the outbreak of foot and mouth disease.Australia's farmers are the best in the world. We must help them to stay that way. We must protect our country from the risk of plant and animal disease.Tonight I announce a dramatic upgrade in the Australian Quarantine and Inspection Service, the Australian Customs Service, Australia Post and airports to strengthen Australia's quarantine protection against foot and mouth disease and other risks to our environment and agriculture. An additional $593 million over five years will be used to increase the inspection of mail and cargo entering Australia. We will increase the inspection of passengers and their baggage so that all passengers from all countries that could bring this disease have their baggage inspected. We will work to minimise undue delays for passengers arriving in Australia but we think these steps are necessary.To meet these necessary costs, the Government has decided to increase the Passenger Movement Charge by $8 to $38 and to continue the policy of full cost recovery for Australian Quarantine and Inspection Service and Australian Customs Service programs involving cargo and seaports.Building Australia's DefenceProtecting our borders against plant and animal disease is important. One of the principal responsibilities of any national government is the defence of the nation and national security.In my last Budget I reported on the outcome of Australia's contribution to peace and security for the people of East Timor. With that experience behind us, and an appreciation of how quickly events can unfold and the uncertainty in our immediate region, the Government commissioned the most specific and detailed defence plan put together in the last three decades.After reviewing that plan, we have budgeted for the largest and most comprehensive investment in our defence capabilities for any Australian government in peacetime. Additional funds totalling $27.6 billion are planned over the next ten years in addition to previous budgeted funding. This will allow major capital investment projects including the purchase of Airborne Early Warning and Control aircraft, the upgrading of the Collins class submarines to high level capability and an increase in the capacity of land forces through the maintenance of six battalion groups. Economic OutlookThe Australian economy is forecast to strengthen in the year ahead, with a rebound in growth to around 3¼ per cent in 2001-02 reflecting sound fundamentals and the ongoing benefits of reform.Following a very sharp downturn in the second half of 2000 residential construction, aided by the First Home Owners Scheme and low interest rates, is expected to contribute strongly to growth in 2001-02. Growth will be supported by household consumption, business investment and net exports.The average unemployment rate is forecast at 7 per cent in 2001-02, which is around current levels. Unemployment has substantially fallen under the Liberal-National Government with over 820,000 jobs created over the last five years.In addition, inflation is expected to decline as the one-off increase in price levels caused by tax changes washes out of the index. The current account deficit as a percentage of GDP will remain well below its average level of the last decade.Australia's growth performance over the second half of the 1990s has been exceptionally strong. And our policy of economic responsibility, budget balance and debt repayment has kept interest rates low.High interest rates turn the dream of home ownership into a nightmare. Nothing helps Australian families more than cutting their largest bill, their monthly mortgage payment.When the Government was elected the home mortgage interest rate was 10.5 per cent. Today it is 6.8 per cent. A family on an average mortgage of $100,000 has had their interest payments cut by over $300 a month.A return of the failed policy which brought the high interest rates of the past would be paid by every family, every month, on every mortgage payment.Concluding CommentsThe first Commonwealth Budget was delivered by Sir George Turner 100 years ago. He said on that occasion:“... While we should spend all that is reasonably necessary for the purpose of defending and developing our country we must see, at all events in the early stages of our career, that there is no extravagance ...”It was good advice then. It is good advice today. We are still in the early stages of our career as a nation. We are still young. We are still building in defence, in welfare reform, in tax reform, in innovation, in agriculture, and building health care to help our families. We are looking after those who spent their lives in the building of the last century. This budget sets out a program to build a stronger Australia over the next.I commend this Budget to the House.IJ4Snowdon, Warren, MP10000SPEAKER, MrMr SPEAKER—I warn the member for the Northern Territory.Debate (on motion by Mr Beazley) adjourned.Miscellaneous2671926719Costello, Peter, MPMr COSTELLOCT4HigginsLPTreasurer10—I present the following papers in connection with the budget:Budget strategy and outlook 2001-02;Budget measures 2001-02;Federal financial relations 2001-02;Agency resourcing 2001-02.Ordered that the papers be printed.Ministerial Statements2671926719Costello, Peter, MPMr COSTELLOCT4HigginsLPTreasurer10—I present ministerial statements as listed in the document now being circulated to honourable members in the chamber. Details of the statements will be recorded in the Votes and Proceedings.Bills26719R130326719Message from the Governor-General transmitting particulars of proposed expenditure and recommending appropriation announced. Bill presented by Mr Fahey, and read a first time.2672020:02:0026720Fahey, John, MPMr FAHEYHQ5MacarthurLPMinister for Finance and Administration10—I move:That the bill be now read a second time.It is with great pleasure that I introduce Appropriation Bill (No. 2) 2001-2002 which, together with Appropriation Bill (No.1) 2001-2002, is one of the principal pieces of legislation underpinning the third budget of the second term of the coalition government.Appropriation Bill (No. 2) provides funding for agencies to meet expenses in relation to grants to the states under section 96 of the Constitution and for payments to the Northern Territory and the Australian Capital Territory; administered expenses for new outcomes; and departmental equity injections, loans and carryovers to agencies, as well as administered capital funding. Appropriations totalling $4,524.7 million are sought in Appropriation Bill (No. 2) 2001-2002. Details of the proposed appropriations are set out in schedule 2 to the bill, the main features of which were outlined in the budget speech delivered by my colleague the Treasurer earlier this evening. I commend the bill to the House.Debate (on motion by Mr Brereton) adjourned.Bills26720R130226720Message from the Governor-General transmitting particulars of proposed expenditure and recommending appropriation announced.Bill presented by Mr Fahey, and read a first time.2672020:05:0026720Fahey, John, MPMr FAHEYHQ5MacarthurLPMinister for Finance and Administration10—I move:That the bill be now read a second time.The purpose of the Appropriation (Parliamentary Departments) Bill is to provide funding for the parliamentary departments for the year ending 30 June 2002.The total amount sought is $164.8 million. Details of the proposed expenditure are set out in the schedule to the bill. I commend the bill to the House.Debate (on motion by Mr McMullan) adjourned.Bills26720R131526720Bill—by leave—presented by Mr Bruce Scott, and read a first time.2672020:06:0026720Scott, Bruce, MPMr BRUCE SCOTTYT4MaranoaNPMinister for Veterans' Affairs and Minister Assisting the Minister for Defence10—I move:That the bill be now read a second time.This bill, the Compensation (Japanese Internment) Bill 2001, will help give effect to this government's commitment in the 2001-02 federal budget to recognise the hardship and suffering endured by those Australians who were held captive by Japan during World War II.Following the fall of Singapore in 1942 and during the war in the Pacific, more than 22,000 Australian men and women were taken prisoner by the Japanese.By war's end, more than 8,000 Australian POWs—36 per cent of those taken prisoner by the Japanese—had died.For up to 3½ years, Australian service personnel and civilians suffered in the most horrific conditions imaginable.They endured starvation and brutal treatment at the hands of their captors.They were forced into slave labour on projects like the Burma-Thailand railway.They were sent on forced marches, such as the notorious death march from Sandakan to Ranau, during which more than 2,000 Australian and Allied prisoners of war died.In recognition of their unique ordeal, the government will make a one-off cash payment of $25,000 to all living Australian prisoners of war and civilian detainees and internees who were held by Japan during World War II. This ex gratia payment will also be made to the surviving widows and widowers of former prisoners, acknowledging those who lost their spouse to the POW camps or supported their partner on their return from the war.The payment will be made to eligible veterans, civilians, widows and widowers who were alive on 1 January 2001. In those cases where an eligible recipient has died since that date, the payment will be made to their estate.Arrangements are being made by regulations under the Veterans Entitlements Act 1986 to make the payment to those former POWs and war widows who receive payments through my department.This bill will enable the payment to be made as soon as possible to other eligible civilians and widows.This budget initiative has the widespread support of both the veteran and general communities.It is my hope that it will bring some degree of comfort to those who suffered so greatly for their service to our nation, Australia.I commend this bill to the House.Debate (on motion by Mr McMullan) adjourned.Bills26721R131226721Bill—by leave—presented by Mr Anthony, and read a first time.2672120:10:0026721Anthony, Larry, MPMr ANTHONYXJ6RichmondNPMinister for Community Services10—I move:That the bill be now read a second time.This bill, the Family and Community Services Legislation Amendment (One-off Payment to the Aged) Bill 2001, forms part of a package of measures that further demonstrates the appreciation and acknowledgment of the government and the community for the contribution older Australians have made and continue to make to society.This bill provides for a one-off payment to the aged to be paid to those people who, on 22 May 2001, have reached age pension age and are receiving a social security pension or benefit.The one-off payment of $300 will be paid to social security pensioners and beneficiaries by 30 June 2001.This special one-off payment will also be available, otherwise than by this bill, to people of age pension age receiving certain veteran payments and payments under the Abstudy scheme. It will also be made available to people of age pension age who are outside the personal income taxation and social security systems.I commend the bill to the House and present the explanatory memorandum.Debate (on motion by Mr McMullan) adjourned.Bills26721R131426721Bill—by leave—presented by Mr Anthony, and read a first time.2672120:12:0026721Anthony, Larry, MPMr ANTHONYXJ6RichmondNPMinister for Community Services10—I move:That the bill be now read a second time.This bill, the Family and Community Services and Veterans' Affairs Legislation Amendment (Further Assistance for Older Australians) Bill 2001, forms part of a package of measures that further demonstrates the appreciation and acknowledgment of the government and the community for the contribution older Australians have made and continue to make to society. This bill recognises the effort many older Australians have made to provide for themselves in retirement.This bill directs special attention towards those who, while on low or modest incomes, do not qualify for age pension.Previously, the Howard government extended access to the Commonwealth seniors health card by increasing the income limits under which a person could qualify.This bill goes further by increasing the income limits to $50,000 for singles and $80,000 for couples, from 1 September 2001.The government has found that not all those qualified for what is a valuable concession have taken up the card. The government will undertake a special publicity campaign to encourage take-up.This bill provides even more incentive for older Australians to take up the seniors health card.The bill provides for the extension of telephone allowance to holders of a seniors health card. Until now, only pensioners and some beneficiaries could qualify.In making telephone allowance to holders of a seniors health card, the government is recognising that being able to communicate by telephone with families and the wider community is vital for the participation of older Australians in society and for the wellbeing of society as a whole.From 1 September 2001, holders of a seniors health card who claim telephone allowance will be paid a quarterly payment—currently $17.20 for both single people and couples—in January, March, July and September each year.The government's package of measures for older Australians also demonstrates its determination to assist those older Australians who through no fault of their own are particularly vulnerable to long-term unemployment.As a result of the consultative process of welfare reform and of the deliberations of the House of Representatives committee which inquired into mature age unemployment, and produced the Nelson report, the government is taking a number of steps to give this group a better deal.As part of this package, superannuation will be exempt from the social security means test until people reach age pension age. This will encourage people not to give up and consider themselves `retired' at an early age, and will help people preserve their superannuation savings for a better retirement in the long run.This bill gives effect to this measure.I commend the bill to the House and present the explanatory memorandum.Debate (on motion by Mr McMullan) adjourned.Bills26722R131326722Bill presented by Mr Slipper, and read a first time.2672220:15:0026722Slipper, Peter, MPMr SLIPPER0V5FisherLPParliamentary Secretary to the Minister for Finance and Administration10—I move:That the bill be now read a second time.As part of tax reform, the government delivered a number of benefits to pensioners and self-funded retirees. These included real increases in pensions and allowances, lower income tax rates, lower capital gains tax rates, one-off, non-taxable bonuses of up to $3,000 and refunds of excess imputation credits. Tonight's budget and this Taxation Laws Amendment (Changes for Senior Australians) Bill 2001 build on those measures which the government has already delivered.This bill amends the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 to enable a substantial increase in the tax rebates available to senior Australians, including self-funded retirees and people who are of age pension age and receiving a Commonwealth pension. The increase in the rebates will be achieved through an amendment to the regulations.The higher rebates will allow single senior Australians to derive taxable income up to $20,000 without paying income tax. This compares to $12,652 in 1999-2000. Senior couples, on equal incomes, will be able to earn taxable income of $32,612 without paying income tax. Regulations have been gazetted to allow single pensioners who are under age pension age to derive taxable income up to $15,970 in 2000-01 without paying tax. This compares to $12,652 in 1999-2000.The bill also amends the Medicare Levy Act 1986 to ensure that senior Australians who are entitled to the increased rebates as a result of this bill do not have to pay the Medicare levy where their taxable income is less than $20,000.The bill also ensures that those Australians under age pension age and who receive a taxable Commonwealth government pension will not have to pay the Medicare levy where their income is below $15,970.This means that these people will be able to earn more income without incurring an income tax or Medicare levy liability.The amendments made by this bill apply to the 2000-01 year of income, which means that these Australians will see the benefits of these measures in a lower tax bill or a higher tax refund after they lodge their 2000-01 income tax return.The bill will also amend the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 to exempt, from income tax, the one-off payment to the aged of $300. This payment was also announced as part of the government's 2001-02 budget.The increased rebates for self-funded retirees and age and other pensioners and the higher Medicare levy thresholds deliver benefits amounting to around $1.5 billion over four years.I commend this bill and present the explanatory memorandum.Debate (on motion by Mr McMullan) adjourned.Committees26723267232672320:19:0026723Charles, Bob, MPMr CHARLESOT4La TrobeLP10—I ask leave of the House to make a short statement relating to the draft budget estimates for the Australian National Audit Office and also to present a copy of my statement.Leave granted.OT4Charles, Bob, MPMr CHARLES—In accordance with the provisions of the Public Accounts and Audit Committee Act 1951, the committee is required to make recommendations to both houses of parliament and to the Prime Minister on the draft—I emphasise the word `draft'—budget estimates of the Australian National Audit Office. The committee, having considered the draft budget estimates for 2001-02 submitted by the Auditor-General is able to advise parliament that it is satisfied that the estimates are sufficient to enable the Auditor-General to properly exercise his functions and powers under the Auditor-General Act 1997. The estimates specifically refer to the provision of assurance audit services, performance audit services and information services.The budget allocation the ANAO is seeking for 2001-02 is $50.126 million, determined in accordance with the outputs-outcomes budget framework. This represents a $530,000 increase over the previous year's budget allocation and a budget saving in real terms of $1 million. Annual financial projections, based on known parameters, indicate that the ANAO should also be able to return $1 million to the budget in 2002-03 and 2003-04. The Auditor-General told the committee that the ANAO's current financial position was sound. The ANAO has sufficient assets to meet short and long-term obligations in relation to employee entitlements and the replacement of non-current assets.The Audit Office will continue its staff recruitment campaign, enhance its knowledge management capabilities, and continue to implement a range of work force planning initiatives. The recruitment and replacement of appropriately skilled staff continue to represent a significant management challenge for the office. The ANAO also expects to decide the outcome of the market testing of its corporate services functions by mid-2001. The ANAO has implemented a new risk based financial audit methodology and embarked on a knowledge management program. Both initiatives will enhance the ANAO's ability to operate more efficiently by reducing audit costs and to transfer knowledge and expertise through audit products and services. As a result of achieving ongoing efficiencies and changes in business practices, the ANAO has sufficient cash reserves to meet the accumulated cost of existing liabilities for employee entitlements and to manage the recently negotiated certified agreement. Projected business requirements for 2001-02 include the funding of a modest increase in audit capacity, and an increase in ANAO's capacity to better meet the needs of parliamentary committees and individual parliamentarians. The Joint Committee of Public Accounts and Audit, in line with its statutory responsibilities as the audit committee of the parliament, will continue to monitor closely the demands placed on the Auditor-General's resources by way of ad hoc audit requests. This will ensure that the Audit Office's wider scheduled program of performance audits is not compromised.Miscellaneous2672410000SPEAKER, MrMr SPEAKER—For the information of honourable members I present copies of congratulatory messages relating to the Centenary of Federation which have been received from various parliaments.Documents267242672410000SPEAKER, MrMr SPEAKER—I present the Auditor-General's audit reports Nos 32 to 36 for 2000-01. Details of the reports will be recorded in the Votes and Proceedings.Ordered that the reports be printed.Documents2672426724Entsch, Warren, MPMr ENTSCH7K6LeichhardtLPParliamentary Secretary to the Minister for Industry, Science and Resources10—Papers are tabled as listed in the schedule circulated to honourable members. Details of the papers will be recorded in the Votes and Proceedings.Motion (by Mr Entsch) proposed:That the House take note of the following paper:Government response to the House of Representatives Standing Committee on Family and Community Affairs—Inquiry into Indigenous Health—Health is Life.Debate (on motion by Mr McMullan) adjourned.Bills26724Messages from the Governor-General reported informing the House of assent to the following bills:Appropriation (Parliamentary Departments) Bill (No. 2) 2000-2001Appropriation Bill (No. 3) 2000-2001Appropriation Bill (No. 4) 2000-2001Crimes Amendment (Forensic Procedures) Bill 2001Broadcasting Legislation Amendment Bill 2001Law and Justice Legislation Amendment (Application of Criminal Code) Bill 2001Taxation Laws Amendment (Excise Arrangements) Bill 2001Customs Tariff Amendment Bill (No. 1) 2001Remuneration Tribunal Amendment Bill 2001Coal Industry Repeal Bill 2001Migration Legislation Amendment (Integrity of Regional Migration Schemes) Bill 2001Electoral and Referendum Amendment Bill (No. 1) 2001Foreign Affairs and Trade Legislation Amendment (Application of Criminal Code) Bill 2001Petroleum (Submerged Lands) Legislation Amendment Bill 2001Petroleum (Submerged Lands) (Registration Fees) Amendment Bill 2001Pig Industry Bill 2001Treasury Legislation Amendment (Application of Criminal Code) Bill (No. 1) 2001Lake Eyre Basin Intergovernmental Agreement Bill 2001Excise Tariff Amendment Bill (No. 1) 2001Customs Tariff Amendment Bill (No. 2) 2001Miscellaneous2672510000SPEAKER, MrMr SPEAKER—I advise the House that the Deputy Speaker has fixed Wednesday, 23 May 2001, at 9.40 a.m., as the time for the next meeting of the Main Committee, unless an alternative day or hour is fixed.Committees26725267252672526725Nehl, Garry, MPMr NEHLAE4CowperNP10—I present the report of the Selection Committee relating to the consideration of committee and delegation reports and private members business on Monday, 4 June 2001. The report will be printed in today's Hansard and the items accorded priority for debate will be published in the Notice Paper for the next sitting.The report read as follows—Report relating to the consideration of committee and delegation reports and private Members' business on Monday, 4 June 2001Pursuant to standing order 331, the Selection Committee has determined the order of precedence and times to be allotted for consideration of committee and delegation reports and private Members' business on Monday, 4 June 2001. The order of precedence and the allotments of time determined by the Committee are shown in the list.COMMITTEE AND DELEGATION REPORTSPresentation and statements1 AUSTRALIAN PARLIAMENTARY DELE--GATION TO THE 46TH COM-MONWEALTH PARLIAMENTARY CON-FERENCE: Report of the Parliamentary Delegation to the 46th Commonwealth Parliamentary Conference, United Kingdom, September 2000.The Committee determined that statements on the report may be made — all statements to conclude by 12.45 p.m.Speech time limits —Each Member — 5 minutes.[Proposed Members speaking = 3 x 5 mins]2 Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade — Joint Standing COMMITTEE: Rough Justice? An Investigation into Allegations of Brutality in the Army's Parachute Battalion.The Committee determined that statements on the report may be made — all statements to conclude by 1.05 p.m.Speech time limits —Each Member — 5 minutes.[Proposed Members speaking = 4 x 5 mins]3 TREATIES — Joint Standing COM-MITTEE: Report 39 — Privileges and Immunities of the International Tribunal on the Law of the Sea and the Treaties Tabled on 27 February and 6 March 2001.The Committee determined that statements on the report may be made — all statements to conclude by 1.15 p.m.Speech time limits —Each Member — 5 minutes.[Proposed Members speaking = 2 x 5 mins]4 COMMUNICATIONS, TRANSPORT AND THE ARTS — Standing COMMITTEE: Report — Back on Track.The Committee determined that statements on the report may be made — all statements to conclude by 1.30 p.m.Speech time limits —Each Member — 5 minutes.[Proposed Members speaking = 3 x 5 mins]PRIVATE MEMBERS' BUSINESSOrder of precedenceNotices1 Mr sidebottom: To present a bill for an Act to amend the Defence Act 1903 to declare the Parliament's intention with respect to the award of Victoria Crosses to certain persons. (Defence Act Amendment (Victoria Cross) Bill 2001 — Notice given 3 April 2001.)Presenter may speak for a period not exceeding 15 minutes — pursuant to sessional order 104A.2 dr southcott: To move—That this House:(1) notes that amongst the OECD, Australia is ranked:(a) 3rd in information and communications technology expenditure as a percentage of GDP;(b) 3rd in secure servers for e-commerce(c) 3rd in internet multimedia content(d) 6th in personal computer ownership; and(e) 8th in total online population; (2) notes Canberra has more adults accessing the internet than Washington; Darwin and Perth have more than Atlanta; Sydney, Melbourne and Hobart more than Los Angeles; and Brisbane and Adelaide are equal with New York;(3) notes our take up rates of cellular phones are amongst the highest in the world;(4) notes Australia's growth and increase in productivity during the 1990s exceeded that of the US;(5) notes the financial services sector is greater in size than the mining and agriculture sectors combined, as a percentage of GDP; and(6) rejects the view Australia represents an old economy. (Notice given 5 December 2000.)Time allotted — 30 minutes.Speech time limits —Mover of motion — 10 minutes.First Opposition Member speaking — 10 minutes.Other Members — 5 minutes each.[Proposed Members speaking = 2 x 10 mins, 2 x 5 mins]The Committee determined that consideration f this matter should continue on a future day.3 MrS gash: To move—That this House:(1) recognises the 100th anniversary of the Australian Army;(2) celebrates not just the peaks of each wave of activity as the Australian Army entered into various frays, but also the times in between when our personnel were ever at the ready;(3) applauds not only those who joined the regular Army, but also those who volunteered or were conscripted at other times and who were prepared to do their duty for our great nation; and(4) remembers the efforts of the thousands or millions of spouses, partners, girlfriends, boyfriends and families of those who served with the Australian Army because they were the people who paid the most through the years so that we might retain our quality of life. (Notice given 8 March 2001.)Time allotted — remaining private Members' business time.Speech time limits —Mover of motion — 10 minutes.First Opposition Member speaking — 10 minutes.Other Members — 5 minutes each.[Proposed Members speaking = 2 x 10 mins, 2 x 5 mins]The Committee determined that consideration of this matter should continue on a future day.20:26:0026726House adjourned at 8.26 p.m.Notices26726The following notices were given:EZ5Abbott, Tony, MPMr Abbott—to present a bill for an act to deal with matters consequential on the enactment of the Workplace Relations (Registered Organisations) Act 2001, and for other purposes.EZ5Abbott, Tony, MPMr Abbott—to present a bill for an act to amend the Workplace Relations Act 1996, and for related purposes.QJ4Theophanous, Dr Andrew, MPDr Theophanous—to move:That this House:(1) expresses its grave concern at the current treatment and persecution of the religious leaders in the Socialist Republic of Vietnam and in particular deplores the recent escalation of oppression directed at independent religious leaders such as Fathers Nguyen Van Ly and Chan Tin of the Catholic Church, Venerables Thich Huyen Quang, Thich Quang Do and Thich Hue Dang of the Unified Vietnamese Buddhist Church and Elder Le Quang Liem of the Hoa Hoa Buddhist Church;(2) deplores the continued imprisonment of a large number of the clergy of the Cao Dai Church and other Christian Evangelical Churches;(3) requests that the Parliament and the Government of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam honour its commitments as a signatory to the International Convention of Human Rights and allow all religious leaders total freedom to practice and carry out their religious activities unhindered;(4) requests the release of all religious campaigners who are currently imprisoned or under house arrest, often as a result of contrived charges of criminality; and(5) calls on the Parliament and the Government of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam to halt and reverse the deterioration of basic human rights, to end the policy of intimidation of human rights campaigners, and to respect the freedom of speech and association of individuals. Answers to Questions in Writing26728The following answers to questions were circulated:26728(Question No. 1222)122226728Ferguson, Laurie, MPMr Laurie Ferguson8T4ReidALP00 asked the Minister for Defence, upon notice, on 7 March 2000: Has the Australian Defence Force transported to East Timor, or met the transport costs of, civilian Australian personnel involved in the distribution of medical supplies to refugee camps and similar Timorese population centres; if so, were any personnel less than 18 years of age; if so, what are the details.26728Reith, Peter, MPMr ReithWI4FlindersLPMinister for Defence10—The answer to the honourable member's question is as follows:Whilst Defence has transported civilian personnel to East Timor, such as those involved in the Christmas concert in December 1999, which included Yothu Yindi, Defence maintains no details on organisations for whom people work, nor specific reasons for travel. Defence maintains records of Personal Indemnity Forms and Next of Kin details only. Consequently, the specific details sought on whether anyone was involved in the distribution of medical supplies in East Timor cannot be given.Travel by Defence civilians and those employed to fulfil contract requirements is on an opportunity space available basis and thus no charge is levied against those transported. Authorisation from Headquarters PeaceKeeping Force is required in each instance.There is no indication that Defence has ever moved civilians under 18 years of age to East Timor.26728(Question No. 1913)191326728Latham, Mark, MPMr LathamK26WerriwaALP00 asked the Minister representing the Minister for Family and Community Services, upon notice, on 4 September 2000:(1) For each State and Territory, what proportion of Australian (a) three year olds and (b) four year olds attend preschool education.(2) How do these statistics compare with other OECD nations.(3) What initiatives has the Government taken to: (a) improve basic literacy and numeracy skills in preschool and (b) introduce diagnostic testing for speech and hearing among preschool students.(4) Does the Government propose to introduce a national preschool program.26728Anthony, Larry, MPMr AnthonyXJ6RichmondNPMinister for Community Services10—The answer to the honourable member's question is as follows:(1) to (4) The matters raised do not fall within the Family and Community Services portfolio.26728(Question No. 2095)209526728Andren, Peter, MPMr AndrenKL6CalareIND00 asked the Treasurer, upon notice, on 31 October 2000:(1) Does page 4 of the Australian Taxation Office's June 2000 publication Off-Road Diesel Fuel Rebate Scheme Guide for Claimants state that under proposed regulations, like fuels will include heavy fuel oil, light fuel oil and all fuels that attract the same rate of duty as diesel (except for gasoline, coal tar, and coke oven distillates).(2) Since 1 August 2000 have both diesel and unleaded petrol attracted excise of 38.118 cents per litre.(3) Given that unleaded fuel is more environmentally friendly than diesel, and is taxed at an identical tax rate, why is the Off-Road Rebate not available for unleaded fuel used for qualifying off-road purposes.(4) Given the current high cost of diesel, will the Government extend the Off-Road Rebate Scheme to cover unleaded fuel; if not, why not; if so, when will this happen.26728Costello, Peter, MPMr CostelloCT4HigginsLPTreasurer10—The answer to the honourable member's question is as follows:(1) Yes.(2) The excise rates for both diesel and unleaded petrol were 38.118 cents per litre (cpl) from 1 August 2000 until 31 January 2001 and 39.643 cpl from 1 February 2001 until 1 March 2001. These rates have been 38.143 cpl since 2 March 2001. (3) The primary purpose of the DFRS is to maintain competitiveness in key export industries by ensuring excise does not act as a cascading cost throughout the production chain. Eligible recipients of the DFRS predominantly use diesel fuel in their activities which is not necessarily the case for consumption of unleaded petrol.(4) See answer (3)26729(Question No. 2129)212926729Jenkins, Harry, MPMr JenkinsHH4ScullinALP00 asked the Prime Minister, upon notice, on 6 November 2000:(1) How many persons in each federal electoral division in Victoria have been awarded the Australian Sports Medal 2000.(2) What are the names of recipients in the electoral division of Scullin.26729Howard, John, MPMr HowardZD4BennelongLPPrime Minister10—The answer to the honourable member's question is as follows:I am advised by my department as follows:(1) and (2) This information is not available on an electorate basis. The breakdown of recipients by state and territory is as follows: New South Wales:5,983Victoria:3,517Queensland:3,248South Australia:1,652Western Australia:2,034Tasmania:694Northern Territory:288Australian Capital Territory:564Norfolk Island:4Christmas Island:1Cocos (Keeling) Islands:1The names of recipients will be published early this year.26729(Question No. 2130)213026729Andren, Peter, MPMr AndrenKL6CalareIND00 asked the Minister for Financial Services and Regulation, upon notice, on 6 November 2000:(1) What is the Government's position with regards to bank account fees (a) in general and (b) charged on accounts held by pensioners?(2) Will the Government legislate to prevent banks from charging fees on bank accounts; if not, why not?(3) Is he aware that in order to receive their fortnightly Centrelink payments, pensioners are required to have an account with a financial institution and that these commonly attract fees?(4) Is he aware of any financial institution offering fee-free accounts for pensioners, if so, can he identify these?(5) Given the Government requires pensioners to have accounts with financial institutions in order to receive government payments, will it legislate to prohibit the charging of fees on these accounts; if not, why not?26729Hockey, Joe, MPMr HockeyDK6North SydneyLPMinister for Financial Services and Regulation10—The answer to the honourable member's question is as follows:(1) and (2) The role of government is not to regulate bank fees and charges, but to ensure that there is sufficient competition, particularly in the area of retail transaction accounts, to keep fees to the minimum necessary. Through the implementation of the Governments response to the 1996 Financial Sector Inquiry (Wallis), the Government is committed to providing an environment for increased competition where consumers in general, including those in receipt of Government pensions, will reap the benefits. (3) It has been brought to my attention that under section 55(2) of the Social Security (Administration Act) 1999, Centrelink, as the Government Agency responsible for delivering social security payments, is required to pay an individuals income support payments into an account nominated by that person. The Secretary of the Department of Family and Community Services, or his delegate, has discretion under Section 55(4) of the Social Security (Administration Act) 1999, to direct all or part of the recipients payment in a different way than that provided in section 55(2). The term 'nominated account' also includes those provided by Credit Unions and Building Societies.Although some bank accounts attract fees, many institutions provide accounts that have no fees or which attract fees after a designated number of free transactions have been exceeded. The Government encourages all consumers to take advantage of competition and to shop around for the account that best suits their needs.(4) The majority of financial institutions offer fee free or low cost bank accounts for pensioners, as well as for other social welfare recipients. A selection of institutions have provided the following information on their low cost accounts and these are provided below.The information is current as at 22 November, 2000.ANZ BankAccount Name: ANZ Access Simplicity Account Details: This account includes 6 free self-service withdrawal transactions (ATM's, EFTPOS, Internet and phone banking), with all deposits free of charge and no monthly account service fee. Excess withdrawals are charged as per the ANZ's fee structure. The following access concessions are also available · If the account is held at an ANZ country branch where no local ANZ ATM is available, the monthly quota of six free withdrawals includes up to six free branch withdrawals. · For disabled customers unable to use ANZ ATMs, the monthly quota of six free withdrawals includes up to six free branch withdrawals, with excess withdrawals charged at a concessional rate.Account Eligibility: This account is available to all ANZ customers. The ANZ also has Deeming Accounts for pensioners. WestpacAccount Name: Basic Account Account Details: Four free withdrawals per month, with no restrictions as to how these free transactions are used, along with no monthly service fee and no minimum balance. Withdrawals over and above the free limit are charged at a rate applicable to other customers using Westpac's retail banking account (except people with disabilities). Eligibility: Customers must be in receipt of a Government pension or and the individuals social security payment must go into the account.Commonwealth Bank of AustraliaAccount Name: Numerous accountsAccount Details: The CBA does not charge personal customers monthly account keeping fees nor does it have a minimum balance requirement on accounts. The CBA provides the majority of its aged pension and war veteran customers with a rebate of $6.00 a month, which can be used for a combination of fee-free transactions (eg 2 over the counter withdrawals, or 10 ATM, or 15 EFTPOS). This is an additional rebate, over and above all personal customer relationship rebates. The CBA's Ezybanking account (an alliance with Woolworths) provides for up to 55 free electronic transactions per month (50 in store and 5 additional outside). The bank also provides fee-free banking to people with a disability, who are unable to use electronic banking.Eligibility: Any customer.National Australia BankAccount Name: Retirement FlexiAccount and Retirement Passbook. Account Details: The Retirement FlexiAccount provides a monthly rebate of $12.00 for transaction fees, with no account keeping charge. Depending on the customers preference, this account allows the customer to perform up to 10 free ATM, EFTPOS and phone transactions a month, or up to 60 Internet transactions, or alternatively the customer can perform up to 3 free branch withdrawals a month, dependent upon their preference. The Retirement Passbook account also provides a monthly rebate of $12.00 for transaction fees, with no account keeping charge. This allows the customer to perform up to 3 free branch withdrawals a month, with the monthly rebate allowable increasing by $1.00 for ever $5000 the customers has in the account. Eligibility: Available to all who have retired.The Australian Association of Permanent Building Societies (AAPBS)The AAPBS has provided the following information on the fee free accounts of selected Building Societies.Illawarra Mutual Building Society: All pensioner accounts are fee-free (apart from Government fees and charges).Hume Building Society: The Pensioner Deeming Savings Account is fee-free for aged, veteran affairs pensioners and self-funded retirees (apart from Government fees and charges).Lifeplan Building Society: The Retirement Maximiser Account is fee-free (apart from Government fees and charges).The AAPBS has also informed that other building societies offer their members (including those on pensioners) accounts that do not attract fees unless certain transaction limits are reached. Credit Union Services Corporation of Australia Limited (CUSCAL)CUSCAL has informed me that a large number of credit unions offer fee-free accounts for all members (not just pensioners) subject to some conditions. These conditions may include limits on the number of transactions performed (ATMs and EFTPOS), or by total cost up to a monthly allowance, or by the use of a credit unions own branches and ATM's.(5) No. The Government believes that attempts to legislate to prohibit the charging of fees on bank accounts would be counter productive, by limiting consumer choice and competition. In addition, as the response to question (4) demonstrates, there are accounts available to pensioners that allow them to pay no fees on their accounts.26731(Question No. 2153)215326731Ripoll, Bernie, MPMr Ripoll83EOxleyALP00 asked the Treasurer, upon notice, on 27 November 2000:(1) Has his attention been drawn to the financial hardship individuals have faced since the Howard Government's failure to introduce a moratorium on GST on building materials and associated costs on building contracts existing prior to 1 July, but not completed before that date.(2) Were delays in completing the building contracts prior to 1 July a direct result of the introduction of the GST and the rush by individuals to finish or commence building prior to extra charges being incurred after 1 July.(3) Is the $7000 GST rebate offered to first home buyers, designed to offset the cost of GST, being almost entirely used for the purchase of pre-owned homes that do not attract the GST, thereby negating the intended effect of the rebate.(4) What is the total sum of revenue obtained by the Government through GST on building contracts that were in existence before 1 July.(5) Has his attention been drawn to claims of job losses through the slowdown in the building industry; if so, what action will he take to ensure that the building industry does not collapse.(6) Is the introduction of the GST on existing building contracts prior to 1 July in line with the Government's promise that no-one will be worse off under the GST; if so, why have extra costs as high as $20 000 been incurred by individuals. (7) What action will he take to ensure that (a) individuals are compensated for losses incurred due to the introduction of the GST in relation to building contracts, (b) a moratorium is put in place to ensure that building contracts can be completed without further penalty, (c) the building industry does not suffer any further losses and job cuts as a result of the introduction of the GST and (d) individuals are compensated for the extra costs incurred in building contracts as a result of the introduction of the GST.26732Costello, Peter, MPMr CostelloCT4HigginsLPTreasurer10—The answer to the honourable member's questions is as follows:(1) I am aware of building contracts where builders promised completion by 1 July 2000 which were not completed by that date.(2) Delays in building construction may have resulted from a wide range of factors, including poor weather, the building industry's own publicity regarding the impact of the GST, and some builders taking on more work than they could handle.(3) I am advised that the States and Territories have indicated that the proportion of first home buyers purchasing new homes is in line with previous experience. Any reports of the effect of the FHOS on first home buyer activity should be treated with caution because of the short duration since the introduction of the FHOS.(4) This information is not available.(5) To assist the building industry, the Government has doubled the original $7000 First Home Owners Scheme grant to $14,000 for first home owners who enter into contracts between 9 March 2001 and 31 December 2001 inclusive to build or purchase new but previously unoccupied homes. This measure, together with recent reductions in interest rates, will stimulate the building sector, including many small businesses, which of course will have flow on benefits to other parts of the economy.(6) Yes it is consistent; income tax cuts more than compensate for these increases when considered in a longer time frame. Further, under the GST transitional arrangements, GST only applies to the value of work done from 1 July 2000 onwards.(7) The Government has already provided concessional treatment to the construction industry, including construction of residential housing, in the GST transition. The transition rules contain special provisions for construction projects which ensure that they are taxed only on the value of work done after 1 July 2000. In contrast, the general `time of supply' rules in the GST law would tax the full value of the goods supplied to a person from 1 July 2000 at the time those goods are made available to the recipient.In addition, the GST applies to contracts entered into after the GST legislation became public on 2 December 1998. It is reasonable to expect that people entering into a construction contract after that date would consider the possibility of the actual construction spanning the introduction of the GST. The GST only applies to contracts entered into before 2 December 1998 if the contracts include a provision allowing the price to be reviewed to take account of the GST. Furthermore, builders benefit from the removal of wholesale sales tax from many products used in the construction of houses and other property.26732(Question No. 2190)219026732Burke, Anna, MPMs Burke83SChisholmALP00 asked the Prime Minister, upon notice, on 29 November 2000:(1) How many recipients of the Australian Sports Medal reside in the electoral divisions of (a) Chisholm, (b) Deakin, (c) Casey, (d) Menzies and (e) Aston.(2) What are the names of recipients in the electoral division of Chisholm.26732Howard, John, MPMr HowardZD4BennelongLPPrime Minister10—The answer to the honourable member's question is as follows:I am advised by my department as follows:(1) and (2) This information is not available on an electorate basis. The breakdown of recipients by state and territory is as follows: New South Wales5,983Victoria3,517Queensland3,248South Australia1,652Western Australia2,034Tasmania694Northern Territory288Australian Capital Territory564Norfolk Island4Christmas Island1Cocos (Keeling) Islands1The names of recipients will be published early this year.26733(Question No. 2230)223026733Ferguson, Martin, MPMr Martin FergusonLS4BatmanALP00 asked the Minister for Financial Services and Regulation, upon notice, on 7 December 2000:(1) Did the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) grant a deadline extension to certain parties in relation to the Sydney Airport Corporation Limited Pricing Inquiry as a result of certain ACCC reports being found to be in error; if so, what errors were found.(2) Are the reports in question those published by the ACCC pursuant to the Airports Act and are based on audited accounts that airports are required by the Act to provide the ACCC.(3) Has the ACCC been aware of the errors for some time; if so, when did the ACCC first become of the errors.(4) Having been advised of the errors, did the ACCC publish a correction; if not, why not and who took that decision.(5) What action has the ACCC taken to ensure that all other reports are correct and that such errors will not occur in the future.(6) Is he satisfied that the ACCC in publishing incorrect reports and then not correcting them has met it obligations to both the Parliament and the firms that it regulates.26733Hockey, Joe, MPMr HockeyDK6North SydneyLPMinister for Financial Services and Regulation10—The answer to the honourable member's question is as follows:(1) The ACCC advises me that no deadline extensions were granted. They also advise me that minor errors were found in two ACCC reports but that these do not relate to Sydney Airport.(2) The errors in question relate to two of the 14 annual regulatory reports prepared by the ACCC to date. The regulatory reports cover quality of service monitoring, price cap compliance, prices monitoring and audited airport accounts that the airport operators are required to provide to the ACCC pursuant to the Airports Act.The errors are minor. They relate to one of the airport account expense line items at one airport, and one of the airport account expense line items and information on airport equity at another airport. In each case the expense totals are correct.The ACCC advises me that as part of its process for checking the contents of the regulatory reports the ACCC had provided draft reports to all of the airport operators, including the two in question. The airport operators were invited to comment on the draft and check the details. Neither operator reported the errors referred to.(3) The ACCC advises me that it has been aware of the errors since mid 2000.(4) The ACCC advises that it will correct the errors as part of the next reporting period. The ACCC is in the process of preparing the reports and will release them early this year.(5) The ACCC requires accounts to be audited. This is an ongoing requirement. The ACCC also provides draft reports to each of the airport operators to check for errors. The ACCC advises me that it will continue this process. It also advises that this process is supported by the airport operators.(6) I am satisfied that the ACCC has met its obligations to Parliament and the firms that it regulates. The reports provide unprecedented levels of information on Sydney Airport and the leased airports. The ACCC advises me that airport users, airport operators and airport investors have provided positive feedback on the usefulness of the reports.26734(Question No. 2277)227726734Ferguson, Martin, MPMr Martin FergusonLS4BatmanALP00 asked the Minister for Transport and Regional Services, upon notice, on 6 February 2001:Are both Virgin Blue and Impulse Airlines meeting their legal obligations with respect to workers' compensation payments and superannuation under Commonwealth, State and Territory laws and is such compliance a condition of holding an Air Operators Certificate; if not, why not. 26734Anderson, John, MPMr Anderson4K4GwydirNPMinister for Transport and Regional Services10—The answer to the honourable member's question is as follows:With regard to any corporate information relating to Virgin Blue and Impulse Airlines, it should be appreciated that both these airlines are private companies. Details of the structuring and administering of their workers' compensation and staff superannuation arrangements, in line with relevant Commonwealth and State law, are therefore matters for the consideration of the airlines' management.With regard to whether compliance with Commonwealth, State and Territory laws applying to workers' compensation and superannuation arrangements is a condition of holding an Air Operator's Certificate (AOC), the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) has advised that it does not have any legal power to impose conditions on AOCs in relation to workers' compensation and superannuation payments. Under section 28 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988, CASA is legally obliged, in issuing an AOC, to focus on those matters listed in the section as directly related to the ability of an organisation to conduct or carry out the AOC operations safely. These include the qualifications, licences, and experience of the organisation's personnel, and its facilities, procedures and practices.26734(Question No. 2280)228026734Ferguson, Martin, MPMr Martin FergusonLS4BatmanALP00 asked the Minister representing the Acting Minster for Finance and Administration, upon notice, on 6 February 2001:(1) In relation to the sale of Sydney Airport, what has been the commercial return on assets for each financial year of the Sydney Airports Corporation Limited (SACL)?(2) Does the proposed increase in aeronautical charges of 130% include consideration for pre-existing investment?(3) If the proposed increase in aeronautical charges is approved, what is the expected increase in SACL profits for the next full financial year?(4) Do current aeronautical charges at Sydney Airport more than allow SACL to recover the costs of its pre-existing investment, if so, is this confirmed by (a) the high rates of return achieved by SACL in 1998-99 and 1999-2000, (b) Standard & Poors A+ long term and A-1 short term credit rating in 1998-99, (c) the Federal Airports Corporation's statements and representations in 1998 that no increase in charges was necessary to achieve a reasonable return on existing investment and (d) current aeronautical charges at Sydney Airport having been set together with those of the Phase 1 privatised airports, which subsequently sold at high earnings multiples?26734Costello, Peter, MPMr CostelloCT4HigginsLPTreasurer10—The Acting Minister for Finance and Administration has supplied the following answer to the honourable member's question:(1) Sydney Airports Corporation Ltd has earned the following returns on assets: 1998-994.7%1999-003.6%(2) SACL's draft proposal values non-land aeronautical assets using the Optimised Depreciated Replacement Cost (ODRC) methodology. This methodology was accepted by the ACCC in its draft decision, released 9 February 2001, as being appropriate. (3) It is not possible to determine the impact any increase in aeronautical charges will have on SACL's profits next financial year, as SACL's profit reflects a number of factors including, but not limited to, aeronautical revenues.(4) No. Current aeronautical charges at Sydney Airport are designed to recover 90% of operating costs.(a) The rates of return earned by Sydney Airports Corporation Ltd were not high for 1998-99 and 1999-00, due largely to the negative return earned on aeronautical assets.(b) I am not aware of the factors Standard & Poors took into consideration in determining SACL's 1998-99 credit rating.(c) This issue is the subject of legal action between Sydney Airports Corporation Ltd and a number of its airline customers. Therefore, it is not a matter on which it is appropriate for me to comment.(d) The current aeronautical charges at Sydney Airport are a legacy of the network pricing of the Federal Airports Corporation. The charges were not set with the Phase 1 privatised airports.26735(Question No. 2281)228126735Ferguson, Martin, MPMr Martin FergusonLS4BatmanALP00 asked the Minister for Finance and Administration, upon notice, on 6 February 2001:(1) Further to the announcement on 18 January 2001 of Salomon Smith Barney and Freehills to conduct the scoping study into the sale of the Sydney basin airports, what was the composition of the panel that made the selection.(2) Which individuals or organisations were the independent private sector representatives, referred to in the media statement as being included on the panel.(3) Who selected the selection panel.(4) What are the terms of reference for the scoping study and what is its expected cost to complete.(5) When is the first interim or draft report expected, who will receive that report and when is the final report due.(6) Will the scoping study be considered by Cabinet.(7) What are the objectives of the Government for the sale of the Sydney basin airports.26735Costello, Peter, MPMr CostelloCT4HigginsLPTreasurer10—The Acting Minister for Finance and Administration has provided the following answer to the honourable member's question:(1) The panel which recommended the selection of Salomon Smith Barney comprised the Chief Executive of the Office of Asset Sales and IT Outsourcing, and two members from the panel of independent private sector representatives. The selection panel for legal advisers comprised the Deputy Chief Executive of OASITO, and two different private sector representatives.(2) For the investment bank appointment, the private sector representatives were Mr John Dickinson and Mr Peter Nixon AO. For the legal appointment, the representatives were Mr Ron Cotton AM and Mr Murray Campbell.(3) The independent panellists were approved by the Minister's office and drawn from a list maintained by OASITO of eminent business people who can provide independent private sector expertise.(4) The terms of reference for the consultancy undertaking the scoping study are attached. The scoping study is expected to cost about $200,000.(5) Drafts of the report of the scoping study were received by OASITO, who consulted with the Department of Transport and Regional Services and other Departments as appropriate. The final report was delivered in late February.(6) The Government considered the results of the scoping study and announced its decision on 29 March 2001. A copy of the press release is attached. (7) The Government's sale objectives are attached to the press release.Sydney Airport Scoping Study Terms of ReferenceThe consultant will be required to undertake the Scoping Study and prepare the report in consultation with the legal adviser, and to provide independent advice, taking into account the Government's decisions on Sydney's future airport needs, and undertake project management activities, in accordance with the following as necessary for the Scoping Study process and/or as requested by OASITO:(a) Business overview and valuation· structure and management issues, with particular reference to the Government's announced intention to privatise the Sydney Airports with Kingsford Smith Airport to be sold separately from the other Sydney Airports and the establishment of conditions to encourage Bankstown to operate as an overflow for Kingsford Smith Airport;· indicative valuation which distinguishes between the valuations attributable to alternative sale methods, timing and sequencing of sales; and· business prospects.(b) The value, feasibility and efficiency of alternative sale options and strategies, taking into account:· possible methods for the Sale of the Sydney Airports, including, public flotation, trade sale, or combination such as with a cornerstone investor, recognising the different characteristics of the airports;· likely investors and investor interest;· possible structural alternatives, including sale as a single business or multiple businesses;· timing implications of alternative sale options;· Commonwealth legal and other regulatory issues (ie economic, environmental etc) and cross-ownership restrictions and airline ownership restrictions etc;· industrial relations issues;· the allocation of responsibilities between the Commonwealth and the State of NSW;· aircraft noise regulation;· aircraft traffic distribution - including airspace management considerations;· efficient pricing of services;· proposed changes to the slot management scheme;· Government policy with respect to the future of the Badgery's Creek site; and· Government policy with respect to regional airline services.(c) Action required to prepare SACL for sale, including:· market testing;· possible restructuring of Sydney Airport assets to reflect the Government's decisions;· identification of any PR/stakeholder issues which may need to be addressed as part of a Sale;· identifying key issues relative to contracts and operations that may present a risk to the proposed sale process;· determining how to structure the Sale to include commitments to developing:· the businesses of the existing airports;· incentives to encourage infrastructure developments (for instance, the extension of the runway at Bankstown together with the development of a passenger terminal);· ongoing financial and operational management during the Sales process;· any necessary or desirable restructuring of the balance sheet including an appropriate commercial gearing level for the preferred sale method and any restructuring of associated debt; and· advice on future borrowings and capital expenditure program.(d) Any other issues relevant to the Government's consideration of the Sale of Sydney Airports. 26737(Question No. 2289)228926737O'Keefe, Neil, MPMr O'KeefeCE4BurkeALP00 asked the Minister representing the Minister for Family and Community Services, upon notice, on 6 February 2001:(1) Is a “life interest” in a farm asset valued and assessed for purposes of the Age Pension assets test.(2) Is it a fact that such life interests are not taken into account if a person was receiving social security support at the time the measure was introduced; if so, will these provisions be extended to people who apply after that date; if not, how does the policy co-exist with the claims made by the Government in its AAA farm package regarding older generational issues.26737Anthony, Larry, MPMr AnthonyXJ6RichmondNPMinister for Community Services10—The Minister for Family and Community Services has provided the following answer to the honourable member's question:(1) A life interest in a farm asset is treated no differently than a life interest in any other asset. Life interests are disregarded for the purposes of the Age Pension assets test unless they are created:• by the person, by the person's partner or both of them; or• on the death of the person's partner.A life interest in the person's principal home, where the person has reasonable security of tenure, is exempt from the assets test.(2) The Social Security Act 1991 does not distinguish between life interests created at different times.The life interest provisions of the Social Security Act 1991 are separate to, and different from, the Agriculture - Advancing Australia (AAA) integrated rural policy package.The AAA package, through the Retirement Assistance for Farmers Scheme (RAFS), allows eligible older farmers who retire to transfer ownership of the family farm to a younger generation without being subject to the social security deprivation provisions when claiming Age Pension. This is not the same as the life interest provisions.26737(Question No. 2296)229626737McClelland, Robert, MPMr McClellandJK6BartonALP00 asked the Minister for Finance and Administration, upon notice, on 6 February 2001:(1) What are the Government's plans in respect of the proposed sale of Sydney (Kingsford-Smith) Airport.(2) Will the proceeds of the sale be used for a specific purpose; if so, what is that purpose.26737Costello, Peter, MPMr CostelloCT4HigginsLPTreasurer10—The Acting Minister for Finance and Administration has supplied the following answer to the honourable member's question:(1) Following its consideration of the scoping study report into the sale of Sydney Airports Corporation Ltd (SACL), the Federal Government has decided to sell Sydney (Kingsford-Smith) Airport by a 100% trade sale to be completed in the second half of this year.(2) The proceeds of the sale of Sydney Airport will be applied to reduce Commonwealth debt.26737(Question No. 2298)229826737Thompson, Cameron, MPMr Cameron Thompson84CBlairLP10 asked the Attorney-General, upon notice, on 6 February 2001:(1) How many judgements by Justices of the Federal Court of Australia have been outstanding for a period of more than 6 months.(2) Is he able to say when these judgements will be delivered.26737Williams, Daryl, MPMr Williams7V5TangneyLPAttorney-General10—The answer to the honourable member's question is as follows:(1) I am advised by the Federal Court that as at 27 February 2001 there were only 28 judgments of the Court outstanding for a period of more than six months. The figure of 28 represents only 1.5 per cent of the number of judgments delivered during 1999-2000, that is 1877. (2) I am further advised by the Court that the judgments will be delivered as soon as possible having regard to the workload of the Court.26738(Question No. 2304)230426738Murphy, John, MPMr Murphy83DLoweALP00 asked the Prime Minister, upon notice, on 6 February 2001:(1) Did he, in his Federation Address `Backing Australia's Ability' on 29 January 2001 announce that over the next five years, each year, an additional 2000 new university places will be created with priority given to Information Communications Technology (ICT), mathematics and science.(2) Does this mean that in the first year 2000 places will be created, and that in the second year these 2000 places continue, and 2000 new places are created, and that in the third year there are 6000 places, 8000 in the fourth year and 10 000 in the fifth year.(3) Will these places lapse after three years, so that in the fourth year the first 2000 places disappear, and in the fifth year after three year's tenure, the second tranche of 2000 places are gone, so that in the fifth year there are only 6000 new places.(4) In either case, does the announcement of 2000 new places each year over the next five years mean more places than the announcement that over that period, this will result in 21 000 equivalent full time student places at a cost of $151 million.(5) Is his figure of 21 000 places based on an attrition rate expected because these new places will be taken up by students who cannot now gain entrance to university courses, despite the low current entrance criteria for science admissions.(6) Has the Government rejected the recommendation of the Chief Scientist in The Chance to Change, August 2000, to create 500 HECS scholarships to attract the best students to science degrees, at a total cost for five cohorts of about $40 million, in favour of a program to enrol weaker students at a cost of $151 million.(7) Does the Government intend to micro-manage the admissions procedures of the autonomous universities to ensure that priority is given to ICT, mathematics and science; if so, does the Government intend to rely on the fact that these new places will be the last choice of aspiring university applicants.26738Howard, John, MPMr HowardZD4BennelongLPPrime Minister10—The answer to the honourable member's question is as follows:I am advised by my department as follows:(1) Yes.(2) (3), (4) Under this initiative, starting from 2002, funding will be provided for 2,000 additional commencing student places. In subsequent years after the first year, funding will also be provided for the places students occupy as they progress through their courses (known as `pipeline').The formula used to cost proposals for new university places has been in place since 1989 and assumes a standard attrition of 25 per cent between years 1 and 2, 2 and 3, and 3 and 4. Using this assumption, funding will be provided for:2,000 first year student places in the first year of the initiative;3,500 places in the second year (2,000 first year student places and 1,500 second year student places);4,625 places in the third year (2,000 first year student places, 1,500 second year student places and 1,125 third year student places); and5,469 places in the fourth and subsequent years (2,000 first year student places, 1,500 second year student places, 1,125 third year student places and 844 fourth year student places).The sum of all commencements with `pipeline' over the first five years of the package is 21,063 equivalent full-time student places.Commonwealth funding for these places is estimated to be $151 million over the first five years (impact on fiscal balance). Universities will also receive funding for the places through the Higher Education Contribution Scheme. (5) No. The assumed attrition rate is for the purposes of costing the measure only. The 25 per cent attrition rate has been applied to funding of new student places across all courses (with the exception of medicine) since 1989. Its continued use in costing the present measure assumes no change in this pattern.(6) Backing Australia's Ability is the Government's strategic response to the key issues identified in a process of wide national consultation and expert review. The Government has had the benefit of both the Chief Scientist's review of Australia's science capability, The Chance to Change, and the report of the Innovation Summit Implementation Group Innovation - Unlocking the Future in developing its statement.The creation of an additional 2,000 university places per annum over the next five years targeted to priority areas will increase the number of educational opportunities in these areas, and will help to address skills shortages in areas of strategic importance to Australia's emerging technology industries.(7) No. The new places will be allocated to universities on a competitive basis. Guidelines to assist universities' development of their submissions are being developed by the Minister for Education, Training and Youth Affairs and will be available shortly.26739(Question No. 2311)231126739Murphy, John, MPMr Murphy83DLoweALP00 asked the Minister for Transport and Regional Services, upon notice, on 6 February 2001:Is he able to say what is the probability of an aircraft crashing over populated areas of Sydney.26739Anderson, John, MPMr Anderson4K4GwydirNPMinister for Transport and Regional Services10—The answer to the honourable member's question is as follows:A formal risk analysis for Sydney Airport was carried out and extensively discussed in the Environmental Impact Statement for the airport's Third Runway. Amongst the findings, this study reported that the chance of a fatality for an individual in a residential area resulting from an aircraft crash ranged from 40 chances per million per year in the vicinity of the runway alignment close to the airport down to one chance per million per year in the vicinity of the runway alignment in areas about 6 kilometres from the airport. Assessed risks for individuals in areas further from the airport or further from the runway alignment were lower than one chance per million per year. The study compared these risks with a range of everyday risks of fatality for an individual including 110 chances per million per year of being killed in an accident at home.26739(Question No. 2312)231226739Murphy, John, MPMr Murphy83DLoweALP00 asked the Minister for Transport and Regional Services, upon notice, on 6 February 2001:(1) Is he aware of best practice in airport environmental management and sustainable airport development.(2) What constitutes best practice in airport environmental management.(3) What is the definition environmental capacity for Australian airports.(4) Can he quantify the environmental capacity of Sydney Airport.(5) In which year was, or will, the environmental capacity for Sydney (Kingsford-Smith) Airport (KSA) be reached.(6) How will environmental capacity influence future KSA development decisions.(7) Where an airport cannot fully compensate residents in compliance with Australian standards, guidelines or regulations for noise, toxic air emissions, and other relevant Australian quality standards, can it be said to have exceeded its environmental capacity.(8) In view of Airports Council Internationals recommendations regarding the achievement of long-term sustainable development for airports, can he quantify the maximum level of environmental impacts of Sydney Airport beyond which he will not allow further expansion. (9) Did Mr Tony Stuart, CEO, in Sydney Airport Corporation Limited's November 1999 Environment Strategy document, state that Sydney Airports mission is to be a world class airport for Sydney, NSW and Australia; if so, does the mission remain unchanged.(10) Will he give details, prior to approval of privatisation in accordance with the Coalitions Putting People First policy, of the Governments total-airport environmental management strategy for KSA; if not, why not.26740Anderson, John, MPMr Anderson4K4GwydirNPMinister for Transport and Regional Services10—The answer to the honourable member's question is as follows:(1) The Airports Act 1996 establishes a Commonwealth environmental management regime at leased Federal airports. The main elements include environmental strategies for each airport, including Sydney Airport, and the monitoring and remediation of pollution. The regime focuses on a cooperative approach to support and ensure compliance with environment standards at airports. The Airports (Environment Protection) Regulations set standards and impose duties in relation to environmental pollution (dealing with air, water and soil quality, and noise emissions other than by aircraft in flight); authorise the monitoring and remediation of breaches of environmental standards; and support better environmental outcomes at leased Federal airports.I would also emphasise that the Environmental Management Systems now being established by the operators of leased Federal airports will be consistent with the International Standards Organisation's (ISO) 14001 Standard for Environmental Management.(2) The industry generally recognises the ISO 14001 standard as current best practice environmental management.(3) No definition of “environmental capacity” has been established for Australian airports.(4) No. See answer to (3).(5) See answer to (3).(6) Although “environmental capacity” is not a concept that has been developed in Australia, environmental considerations do have a fundamental role in the decision making process for any future developments at Sydney Airport. Proposals for developing the facilities and operational aspects of Sydney Airport are subject to the assessment and consultation requirements of the Airports Act 1996 and the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999.(7) See answer to (3).(8) No. The demand for air travel to and from Sydney requires the Government to balance the commercial interests of airport operators and users with the broader interests of the community. Measures to protect the community from the adverse impacts of Sydney Airport include a legislated curfew, the Long Term Operating Plan (LTOP), a demand management scheme that limits allocated movements to a maximum of 80 per hour and a noise insulation scheme for public buildings and private residences in the high noise exposure areas.(9) Yes. The relevant section of the Airport Environment Strategy has not been altered since its approval.(10) The Airport Environment Strategy for Sydney Airport is a public document. My Office will be happy to make a copy available to the Honourable Member.26740(Question No. 2313)231326740Murphy, John, MPMr Murphy83DLoweALP00 asked the Minister for Transport and Regional Services, upon notice, on 6 February 2001:(1) Did Environment Australia find in its July 1999 Second Sydney Airport Environment Assessment Report (pp.5-4) that the 1985 site selection environmental impact statement ranked Wilton as second overall of the ten sites short listed and the favoured site outside the Sydney basin and that Wilton must rank well as an alternative site to Badgerys Creek; if so, can he provide technical reasons for his exclusion of Wilton and Darkes Forest from consideration as potential new airport sites for Sydney. (2) Will he recall from schools all copies of the Sydney Airport Corporation Limited's document titled: Sydney Airport Australia's International Gateway teachers and students booklets Human Society and Its Environment Curriculum support materials: Stage 3, on the grounds that it contains biased, misleading and incomplete information.26741Anderson, John, MPMr Anderson4K4GwydirNPMinister for Transport and Regional Services10—The answer to the honourable member's question is as follows:(1) The July 1999 Environmental Assessment Report by Environment Australia on the Second Sydney Airport proposal did refer to the findings of the 1985 site selection Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) which ranked Wilton as the best of the mid-distance sites while Badgerys Creek was considered to be the best of the closer sites.The EIS on the second Sydney airport proposal, which was completed in June 1999, was specifically for the Badgerys Creek site. Environment Australia's Guidelines for this EIS clearly acknowledged that alternative site locations would not be addressed in detail having been the subject of a separate `site selection' EIS in 1985 and subsequent Government decisions (except for the Holsworthy site which had been the subject of more recent study).(2) This is a matter for the Minister for Finance and Administration, the Hon John Fahey MP, who is the portfolio Minister responsible for the Sydney Airports Corporation Limited.26741(Question No. 2320)232026741Murphy, John, MPMr Murphy83DLoweALP00 asked the Minister for Finance and Administration, upon notice, on 6 February 2001:(1) Will he outline the Government's process to be followed concerning the proposed sale of Sydney (Kingsford-Smith) Airport (KSA).(2) By what date would the Government prefer KSA to be sold.(3) Is he aware of the corporate structure of Westralia Airports Corporation Pty Limited.(4) Is it permissible for those persons who hold an equity interest in (a) Westralia Airports Corporation Pty Limited, (b) Airstralia Development Group, (c) Airport Group International Holdings or (d) any other airport-lessee and airport-management company in Australia to hold equity interest in another airport-lessee or airport-management company in Australia.(5) Subject to the provisions contained in the Airports Act, is it possible for a person holding an equity interest in an airport-lessee or airport-management company to also hold an equity interest in another airport-lessee or airport-management company.(6) Is an airport-lessee or airport-management company eligible to sell shares in those companies on the Australian Stock Exchange.26741Costello, Peter, MPMr CostelloCT4HigginsLPTreasurer10—The Acting Minister for Finance and Administration has supplied the following answer to the honourable member's question:(1) The Government has announced that Sydney (Kingsford Smith) Airport will be sold by way of a 100% trade sale. The press release announcing the sale is attached.(2) By the second half of 2001.(3) No.(4) (5) and (6) The Airports Act 1996 contains provisions relating to the ownership restrictions applicable to airport operator companies, which covers both airport lessee and airport management companies. The Minister for Transport and Regional Services is the responsible Minister.26741(Question No. 2324)232426741Price, Roger, MPMr PriceQI4ChifleyALP00 asked the Minister Assisting the Minister for Defence, upon notice, on 6 February 2001:(1) Further to the answer to question No. 557 (Hansard, 12 May 1999, page 5321) in which it is stated the only other claims of inappropriate disciplinary action involve another Army unit at Holsworthy, was the unit referred to 3 RAR; if so, what prevented the unit from being named in the answer. (2) When was the first time that the inappropriate disciplinary action was brought to the attention of the relevant Minister.(3) Who was that Minister.(4) Was the Minister or his staff or her staff briefed on the matter by either the ADF or the Department of Defence; if so, on what dates and by whom.(5) What if any ministerial directions were issued by the Minister, on what date and to what effect.(6) When was he or his ministerial staff first briefed on the 3 RAR Affair and by whom.(7) What ministerial directions were issued, when and to what effect.(8) On what subsequent occasions was he or his staff briefed on the 3 RAR Affair.(9) What if any ministerial directions were issued, when and to what effect.(10) Was Minister Moore or his staff briefed on the 3 RAR Affair; if so, when and by whom.(11) Did Minister Moore or his staff issue or provide any directions; if so when and to what effect.26742Scott, Bruce, MPMr Bruce ScottYT4MaranoaNPMinister for Veterans' Affairs and Minister Assisting the Minister for Defence10—The answer to the honourable member's question is as follows:(1) Yes. Release of detail at the time was inappropriate as it may have prejudiced the investigation or legal proceedings.(2) While several individual incidents had been reported as representations to the Office of the Minister for Defence Science and Personnel commencing in March 1998, formal advice of inappropriate disciplinary action was first received on 22 March 1999.(3) The Minister Assisting the Minister for Defence.(4) Yes. The Chief of Army provided a brief on 22 March 1999.(5) The Chief of Army was asked to ensure all allegations were thoroughly investigated and disciplinary action taken where appropriate.(6) On 22 March 1999 by the Chief of Army.(7) The Chief of Army was asked to ensure all allegations were thoroughly investigated and disciplinary action taken where appropriate.(8) My staff and I have been kept regularly informed on 3 RAR issues.(9) The Chief of Army was asked to ensure all allegations were thoroughly investigated and disciplinary action taken where appropriate.(10) The Chief of Army provided a brief to the Office of the Minister for Defence on 22 March 1999.(11) Yes, that the Minister Assisting the Minister for Defence was to handle the issue.26742(Question No. 2325)232526742Price, Roger, MPMr PriceQI4ChifleyALP00 asked the Minister Assisting the Minister for Defence, upon notice, on 6 February 2001:(1) Further to the answer to question No. 557 (Hansard, 12 May 1999, page 5321) in which it is stated that the military police were investigating claims made against another unit at Holsworthy since September 1998, were the military police given terms of reference; if so, (a) by whom and (b) what were they.(2) Were the military police investigating individual incidences at 3 RAR; if so, how many.(3) What were the ranks of the (a) perpetrators and (b) victims.(4) Were all the available reports and evidence provided to the military police; if so, what was provided; if not, what was withheld and why.(5) At any point in its inquiry, did the military police form the view that there may have been a culture of violence. (6) At any stage of its inquiry did the military police put the view to 3 RAR Command that there was a culture of violence in 3 RAR, if so when and to what effect.(7) Was the military police investigation truncated in any way; if so, how and whose authority.26743Scott, Bruce, MPMr Bruce ScottYT4MaranoaNPMinister for Veterans' Affairs and Minister Assisting the Minister for Defence10—The answer to the honourable member's question is as follows:(1) (a) and (b) The Chief of Staff, Deployable Joint Force Headquarters, advised Military Police in writing on 14 September 1998 of allegations contained in a statement by a member of 3 RAR. The Chief of Staff provided guidance, which has subsequently been referred to as a Terms of Reference, to Military Police to investigate the allegations. Whilst there was no provision of a formal set of Terms of Reference, guidance for the investigations was made under the Defence Force Discipline Act 1982.(2) Allegations contained in the statement by a member of 3 RAR were initially investigated by Military Police as an isolated incident. The Chief of Staff , Deployable Joint Force Headquarters, required any other associated incidents to be investigated. Enquiries into allegations progressively identified information that warranted investigations being conducted with a larger number of personnel resulting in 11 personnel being charged.(3) (a) and (b) Eleven members and former members of 3 RAR were charged following investigations into allegations made. Of the eleven charges, eight were finalised as at 2 April 2001.· A Private tried (incident against another Private) - Found Not Guilty. However, as a result of subsequent Service Police enquiries was charged with a fresh matter (Assault on a Private) and found guilty.· A Private (aid and abet assault on a Private). Not proceeded with due to insufficient evidence.· A Private tried (assault against a Private) - Found Not Guilty.· A Corporal (assault on a Private) - Found Not Guilty (ill-treat inferior), but guilty of (negligent performance of duty).· A Corporal (assault on a Private). Not proceeded with due to insufficient evidence. Complainant did not want matter to proceed.· A Corporal (assault on a Private). Not proceeded with due to insufficient evidence. Complainant did not want matter to proceed.· A Private (assault on a Private) - Found Guilty.· A Private (assault on a Private) was discharged in June 2000 with charge pending. The matter was referred to NSW Police.· A Major (assault on a Lieutenant) - Found Guilty (ill-treat inferior).With regard to the remaining two matters, legal proceedings are continuing and it would be inappropriate to provide details until proceedings have been completed.(4) No. Military Police Investigators provided a notification of requirement to provide documentation to the Commanding Officer 3 RAR. Documents requested were sourced and provided to the Military Police. Duty Officer Logs prior to January 1997, Battalion Orderly Sergeant Logs from January 1996 to October 1997 and Guard Commander Reports from January 1996 to October 1997, March 1998 to May 1998, April 1999, July 1999 and October 1999 could not be located. Certification that documents could not be located was advised to the Military Police in writing.(5) No. The preamble to the final report submitted by the Military Police refers to an alleged culture of violence. The report does not state a culture of violence existed.(6) Current and former members of 3 RAR's chain of command were questioned as part of the Military Police investigation concluded on 29 April 1999. When current disciplinary proceedings are concluded the degree of command responsibility for the incidents as a whole will be determined.(7) No. The Military Police investigation had been ongoing for seven months by March 1999. Investigators were asked on several occasions prior to March 1999 what support or other action was required to ensure the investigation was conducted thoroughly and quickly. There was no direction by any person to the Military Police to truncate the investigation.26744(Question No. 2333)233326744Latham, Mark, MPMr LathamK26WerriwaALP00 asked the Minister for Reconciliation and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Affairs, upon notice, on 6 February 2001:(1) Did Australia on 30 October 1989 accept the UNESCO 1970 Convention on the Means of Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit Import, Export and Transfer of Ownership of Cultural Property.(2) Has he noted the recommendations of the Illicit Trade Advisory Panel in a report to the British Arts Minister on 18 December 2000 that the UK should accede to the Convention.(3) What progress has been made since the answer to question No. 1674 (Hansard, 31 August 2000, Page 19963) in returning Indigenous human remains from the UK to Australian Indigenous communities.26744Ruddock, Philip, MPMr Ruddock0J4BerowraLPMinister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs and Minister for Reconciliation and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Affairs10—The following information is provided in response to the honourable member's question:(1) “The 1970 UNESCO Convention on the Means of Prohibition and Prevention of Illicit Import, Export and Transfer of Ownership of Cultural Property was accepted by Australia on the 30 October 1989, with entry into force in Australia 30 January 1990.”(2) “The recommendations of the Illicit Trade Advisory Panel put to the British Arts Minister in a report on 18 December 2000, that the UK should accede to the Convention, has been noted.In relation to that recommendation put to the British Arts Minister by the Illicit Trade Advisory Panel, the Australian Government does not advise the British Government about its decisions concerning international conventions.”(3) “In June 2000 my predecessor, Senator Herron, made a submission on this issue to the House of Commons Culture, Media and Sports Committee inquiry into Cultural Property: Return and Illicit Trade. The Australian and British Prime Ministers issued a joint statement on 4 July 2000 that outlined their governments' commitment to increasing efforts to repatriate human remains to Australian Indigenous communities.In this context, and as already mentioned in question No. 1674 (Hansard, 31 August 2000, Page 19963), there are legislative constraints on certain items such as human remains. Consultations are currently being undertaken by the British Government within its own dominion on the terms of legislation to permit the trustees of the national museums to remove human remains from their collections, allowing facilitation and repatriation of Australia's Indigenous human remains.I am unable to comment about the likely timing of any future British Government legislation regarding this matter.”26744(Question No. 2335)233526744McClelland, Robert, MPMr McClellandJK6BartonALP00 asked the Attorney-General, upon notice, on 7 February 2001:(1) Was the Rome Statue of the International Criminal Court adopted in Rome on 17 July 1998.(2) Was the Statute signed for Australia, subject to ratification, on 9 December 1998.(3) Which other states have (a) signed and (b) ratified the Statute, and on what dates did they do so.(4) Is his Department the lead agency in developing the legislation to implement the Statute.(5) What is the timetable for the introduction of the legislation.26744Williams, Daryl, MPMr Williams7V5TangneyLPAttorney-General10—The answer to the honourable member's question is as follows:(1) Yes.(2) Yes.(3) As at 30 April 2001, 139 States had signed and 30 States had ratified the Statute. Information as to those that have signed and ratified is attached.(4) Yes.(5) Drafting instructions have been issued for the legislation and drafting is now proceeding. It is hoped that drafting will be completed and the legislation introduced as soon as practicable. The Joint Standing Committee on Treaties is also conducting an inquiry into the Statute, and will be examining the legislation in the context of that inquiry. 26745(Question No. 2355)235526745Ferguson, Laurie, MPMr Laurie Ferguson8T4ReidALP00 asked the Minister Assisting the Minister for Defence, upon notice, on 8 February 2001:How many Defence Reserve training depots were in use in each State or Territory as at (a) March 1996, (b) October 1998 and (c) February 2001.26745Scott, Bruce, MPMr Bruce ScottYT4MaranoaNPMinister for Veterans' Affairs and Minister Assisting the Minister for Defence10—The answer to the honourable member's question is as follows: StateMarch 1996October 1998February 2001ACT111NSW524138QLD292927NT111WA131212SA12108VIC453631TAS1366TOTAL166136124There has been about a 25 per cent decrease in the number of reserve depots over the last four years. The location of many depots is based on historical and demographic factors. Some depots are no longer viable and the facilities are outdated. While a number of properties have become surplus, new multi-user depots are being constructed in a number of locations to provide better, more functional facilities with a focus on collective training and improved readiness levels for Reserves.26745(Question No. 2357)235726745Fitzgibbon, Joel, MPMr Fitzgibbon8K6HunterALP00 asked the Treasurer, upon notice, on 8 February 2001:(1) What amount of GST Start-Up Assistance money was paid to the Tourism Council of Australia (TCA).(2) On what dates were the grants paid to the TCA.(3) What amount of the grant funding paid to the TCA remains unspent.(4) What due diligence did Treasury undertake to determine the TCA's solvency before the payment of the grant.(5) How does his Department intend to recoup the unspent grant funds.26745Costello, Peter, MPMr CostelloCT4HigginsLPTreasurer10—The answer to the honourable member's question is as follows:(1) The amount paid under the contract was $2,316,850.(2) Five payments, totalling the full amount of the contract, were made to the TCA on the following dates: 5 November 1999, 5 January 2000, 1 March 2000, 19 April 2000 and 30 June 2000. The first payment was made after signature of the contract and each subsequent payment was made on the basis of an activity report from TCA in respect to delivery against the contract.(3) $586.(4) Organisations were selected under the Organisation Delivered Assistance programme on the basis of a risk management assessment of the capacity of the organisation to deliver services under the contract.This involved an assessment of the proposals against a set of criteria to ascertain the ability of the organisation to deliver the programme. This was developed to meet the requirements of Treasury's Chief Executive Instructions under the Financial Management and Accountability Act 1997 and relevant risk management standards. Treasury also undertook an ASIC check to ascertain the status of the entity as a registered company.Treasury's contracts under this programme were structured to minimise the Commonwealth's risk. This involved an initial payment, with most funding paid as instalments after an acquittal of previous payments against the delivery of milestones. Other risk controls included a requirement that funding could only be used the carry out the project, could not be used to meet past deficits or expenditures and were subject to an independent audit.In relation to TCA, there has been no failure in the risk management procedures as an independent audit of the contract confirms that the public funding provided under the contract has been acquitted to meet its contractual obligations.(5) The Department is dealing with the Voluntary Administrator on this matter.26746(Question No. 2361)236126746McClelland, Robert, MPMr McClellandJK6BartonALP00 asked the Attorney-General, upon notice, on 8 February 2001:(1) What is the current Family Court of Australia fee for (a) Application for divorce (Form 4), (b) Application for nullity (Form 2), (c) Application for declaration of validity (Form 6), (d) Application for final orders Form (3), (e) Response to application for final orders (Form 3A), (f) Notice of appeal to Full Court (Form 42), (g) Notice of appeal from court of summary jurisdiction (Form 43) and (h) Fixing of hearing date (defended matters).(2) When were these Family Court of Australia fees most recently increased.(3) What was the percentage increase for each fee on each occasion.(4) What was each fee prior to its most recent increase.(5) When are Family Court fees next scheduled to be increased.(6) Is it the case that Family Court fees are regularly increased by changes in the CPI.(7) Will the next increase of Family Court fees use CPI figures which include the impact of the inflationary spike caused by the introduction of the GST.26746Williams, Daryl, MPMr Williams7V5TangneyLPAttorney-General10—The answer to the honourable member's question is as follows:(1) The current Family Court fees are:(a) Application for divorce (Form 4) $526(b) Application for nullity (Form 2) $526(c) Application for declaration of validity (Form 6) $526(d) Application for final orders (Form 3) $158(e) Response to application for final orders (Form 3A) $158(f) Notice of appeal to Full Court (Form 42) $648(g) Notice of appeal from court of summary jurisdiction (Form 43) $648(h) Fixing of hearing date (defended matters) $315(2) The last increase in Family Court fees was on 1 July 2000. This was the first increase in fees for two years.(3) The fees were increased by 4.07% according to a formula involving the All Groups Consumer Price Index.(4) The fees prior to the most recent increase were:(a) Application for divorce (Form 4) $505(b) Application for nullity (Form 2) $505(c) Application for declaration of validity (Form 6) $505(d) Application for final orders (Form 3) $152 (e) Response to application for final orders (Form 3A) $152(f) Notice of appeal to Full Court (Form 42) $623(g) Notice of appeal from court of summary jurisdiction (Form 43) $623(h) Fixing of hearing date (defended matters) $303(5) Regulations 21AA and 21AB of the Family Law Regulations 1984 provide for the biennial increase of fees payable in the Family Court. The next increase will take effect on 1 July 2002.(6) The Family Law Regulations provide for biennial fee increases according to a formula involving the All Groups Consumer Price Index.(7) Regulation 21AB provides the formula for calculating the increase. The formula for the next increase, for July 2002, will involve using the All Groups Consumer Price Index numbers for the 2000 and 2002 March quarters.26747(Question No. 2362)236226747McClelland, Robert, MPMr McClellandJK6BartonALP00 asked the Attorney-General, upon notice, on 8 February 2001:(1) Has his attention been drawn to a recent international study of 750 websites conducted by Consumers International which found that (a) few web sites gave meaningful information about how information collected from consumers would be used, (b) some companies used information to selectively raise prices for some customers and (c) only 10% of 102 children's sites asked children to obtain parental consent before disclosing material online.(2) What measures are currently in place to ensure that businesses which collect personal information from consumers via the internet (a) provide information about how information collected from consumers will be used, (b) do not use such information to selectively exploit customers and (c) obtain parental consent before collecting personal information from children.26747Williams, Daryl, MPMr Williams7V5TangneyLPAttorney-General10—The answer to the honourable member's question is as follows:(1) I am aware of the Privacy@net comparative study of consumer privacy on the Internet produced by Consumers International in January 2001 on the basis of assessments carried out between March to July 2000. I understand that a main objective of the study was to compare the experience of consumers in the United States (US) and the European Union (EU) because of the differences in approach to regulation between the two. Of the 751 sites assessed for the study 679 were in either the US or the EU. The Australian Consumers Association participated in the study, contributing 29 questionnaires, presumably about Australian sites.(2) As the honourable member is aware, the Parliament passed the Privacy Amendment (Private Sector) Act 2000 in December last year to set privacy standards for the handling of personal information by private sector organisations. That Act, which contains amendments to the Commonwealth Privacy Act 1988, will come into effect on 21 December this year. Most organisations covered by the legislation have the time up to that date to review their current practices and procedures to ensure compliance with the National Privacy Principles. The legislation is technology-neutral and will apply equally to the digital and paper-based environments. As a result of self-regulatory initiatives in recent years, many organisations would be presently complying with the Privacy Commissioner's National Principles for the Fair Handling of Personal Information pending the commencement of the legislation. The National Privacy Principles in the legislation are based on the Privacy Commissioner's National Principles. Among other things these Principles encourage businesses to inform consumers about the purposes for which their personal information is being collected, and how the business intends to use and disclose that information.The Office of the Federal Privacy Commissioner is taking an active role to assist organisations prepare for their new statutory privacy obligations. Relevant information can be accessed through the Commissioner's web site [www.privacy.gov.au]. The Privacy Amendment (Private Sector) Act 2000 does not contain specific provisions about the need to obtain parental consent before collecting personal information from children. Following my announcement in December 2000, my Department is convening a Consultative Group and is preparing a discussion paper for broader consultation on the issue of children's privacy. In May 2000 the Hon Joe Hockey MP, Minister for Financial Services and Regulation, released a best practice guide for businesses and consumers in relation to e-commerce dealings. Among other things, Building Consumer Sovereignty in Electronic Commerce: A best practice model for business, contained guidance on fair business practices, privacy issues and advertising or marketing to children under 16 years.The Australian Broadcasting Authority's Children's Television Standard contains standards concerning advertising to children. The Australian Broadcasting Authority web site, Australian Families Guide to the Internet, launched in November 1998, provides parents and carers with useful information and tools to guide their children to get the best out of the Internet, while protecting them from the worst. While Governments can legislate to put measures in place to assist in protecting children from the risks of using the Internet, parents and carers will always be in the best position to monitor how their children use the Internet.26748(Question No. 2363)236326748Thomson, Kelvin, MPMr Kelvin ThomsonUK6WillsALP00 asked the Treasurer, upon notice, on 8 February 2001:(1) Has his attention been drawn to the article entitled “How canny ones can abuse system” in the Australian Financial Review on 31 January 2001.(2) Given the three year rolling average that is used to determine the level of research and development (R&D) spending, how will the Government prevent companies from lowering their expenditure on R&D this year to qualify for a higher proportion of future expenditure.26748Costello, Peter, MPMr CostelloCT4HigginsLPTreasurer10—The answer to the honourable member's question is as follows:(1) and (2) Anti-avoidance measures will be introduced as part of the concession to prevent any potential abuse.26748(Question No. 2368)236826748Danby, Michael, MPMr DanbyWF6Melbourne PortsALP00 asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs, upon notice, on 26 February 2001:(1) Is he aware of new evidence unearthed by the non-government Documentary Centre of Cambodia of the notorious Tuol Sleng interrogation and detention centre in central Phnom Penh regarding the presence of Chinese advisers to the Pol Pot regime.(2) Has the Australian Embassy in Phnom Penh or the Australian Chinese Human Rights Dialogue evaluated the photographs and evidence that 10 Chinese advisers provided training to the Pol Pot death squad.(3) Is he able to say whether a Chinese Embassy spokesperson Wu Chingshen warned the editors of the capital's English language daily newspaper the Phnom Penh Post of unspeakable negative effects if they published the story.(4) Did the Beijing regime in November oppose the proposal of the UN special envoy on human rights to Cambodia to elect a permanent or even ad hoc international tribunal on Khmer Rouge genocide.(5) Has the Chinese Government taken over much of the suspended Western aid to the Hun Sen Government in Cambodia.(6) Has the Hun Sen Government thwarted recent proposals for an international criminal tribunal into the crimes of the Khmer Rouge.26748Downer, Alexander, MPMr Downer4G4MayoLPMinister for Foreign Affairs10—The answer to the honourable member's question is as follows:(1) No.(2) Embassy officials have met with Youk Chhang, Director of the DCC in regard to this story and the report prepared by the DCC.(3) No.(4) Chinese Government opposition to the United Nations Special Envoy on Human Rights, Thomas Hammerberg's submission to the United Nations General Assembly in November 1997, calling for the United Nations to proceed with an international Khmer Rouge Tribunal, has been well documented. (5) The Chinese Government is a significant player in Cambodia. It is not possible to quantify China's financial aid to Cambodia as these figures are not released by the Chinese Government.(6) The Australian Government has welcomed the conclusion of deliberations on the draft Khmer Rouge Law by the Cambodian Constitutional Council on 12 February. This follows the successful passage of the law through the Cambodian Parliament and Senate in January. The draft law will now be re-considered by the National Assembly and then submitted to King Norodom Sihanouk, before final consultations between the Cambodian Government and the United Nations. These are positive developments for Cambodia in moving a step closer to bringing to trial senior Khmer Rouge leaders, an issue in which great sensitivities still exist within Cambodian society.26749(Question No. 2376)237626749Murphy, John, MPMr Murphy83DLoweALP00 asked the Attorney-General, upon notice, on 27 February 2001:(1) Further to the answer to question No. 2145, how many medical reports from senior specialists addressing the medical condition of former Senator Malcolm Arthur Colston were submitted to the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) on 7 April 1999 by the solicitors acting for Dr Colston and when were the reports dated.(2) Following the request by the DPP that Dr Colston be independently examined to assist the Acting Director to assess the submission made on behalf of Dr Colston by his solicitors, can the DPP confirm that on 3 May 1999 Dr Colston's counsel stated in the Supreme Court that Dr Colston had agreed to be so medically examined.(3) Can the DPP confirm that, after 3 May 1999, Dr Colston was separately examined by two eminent medical specialists.(4) What was the process employed by the DPP to select the independent medical specialists to examine Dr Colston.(5) Did an officer of the office of the DPP recommend to the DPP the names of one or both of the eminent specialists to medically examine Dr Colston; if so, what are the qualifications of the officer who made the recommendation to the DPP.(6) What are the disciplines of the two eminent specialists selected to examine Dr Colston and what medical qualifications does each specialist possess.(7) On what dates did the examinations of Dr Colston by the two eminent specialists take place.(8) Is he able to say how Dr Colston was examined, including the nature of the examinations and what was involved in each examination.(9) Were written reports of the examinations provided to the DPP.(10) What are the dates of the reports.(11) Does either report express an opinion on the life expectancy of Dr Colston; if so, is any opinion expressed in weeks, months or years.(12) What fees were charged by each specialist for their medical reports.(13) Apart from the medical report dated 23 November 2000 provided to the DPP by Dr Colston's solicitors, were any other medical reports on the state of health of Dr Colston provided or obtained by the DPP after the DPP's media statement of 5 July 1999 not to proceed with the prosecution of Dr Colston; if so, (a) how many reports were provided; (b) what are the dates of the reports and (c) what are the medical qualifications of each author of the reports; if other reports were not obtained, why not.(14) Does the medical report of 23 November 2000 provided to the DPP by Dr Colston's solicitors indicate any improvement in the state of health of Dr Colston.(15) Does the medical report of 23 November 2000 provided to the DPP by Dr Colston's solicitors indicate any deterioration of the state of health of Dr Colston. (16) Were any reports obtained by the DPP after 5 July 1999 not provided through Dr Colston's solicitors; if so, (a) how many and (b) what are the dates of the reports.(17) Is the DPP aware of media reports on 14 November 2000 that Dr Colston had been admitted to Wesley Private Hospital in Brisbane just days after the office of the DPP announced it was reviewing its decision to drop travel rorts charges against him.(18) Is the DPP aware of media reports on 14 November 2000 that sources had revealed that tests had shown cancer had spread to all of Dr Colston's vital organs.(19) Has the DPP obtained a copy of any of the medical tests conducted on Dr Colston arising from his admission to Wesley Private Hospital in Brisbane; if not, why not; if so, do the results of those tests indicate a deterioration of Dr Colston's health.(20) On what date did the DPP re-open its investigation of Dr Colston's case.(21) What was the basis for re-opening the investigation of Dr Colston's case.(22) Is Dr Colston now capable of standing trial on the twenty-eight charges of defrauding the Commonwealth through travel rorts.26750Williams, Daryl, MPMr Williams7V5TangneyLPAttorney-General10—The answer to the honourable member's question is as follows:(1) Three, 18/3/99, 19/3/99, 24/3/99.(2) Yes.(3) Yes.(4) The DPP selected leaders in their respective fields relevant to Dr Colston's condition.(5) Yes. Legal.(6) (i); Medicine; Professor of Medicine, Dr of Medicine, Fellow of Royal Australian College of Physicians. (ii) Surgery; Professor of Surgery, Dr of Medicine, Fellow of Royal College of Surgery, Fellow American College of Surgeons.(7) 14/5/99, 19/5/99.(8) Dr Colston was physically examined.(9) Yes.(10) 17/5/99, 31/5/99.(11) Yes. Months.(12) $2,850.00, $2,500.00.(13) (a) Two (b) 13/12/00, 9/2/01 (c) See (6) and (4).(14) No.(15) Yes.(16) Yes. See (13).(17) Yes.(18) No.(19) No, as the independent experts retained by the DPP have assessed medical tests conducted on Dr Colston. Yes.(20) 4/10/00.(21) The need to ascertain Dr Colston's current medical condition.(22) No.26750(Question No. 2377)237726750Danby, Michael, MPMr DanbyWF6Melbourne PortsALP00 asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs, upon notice, on 27 February 2001:(1) Has his attention been drawn to a report of a cocktail party at the Australian Embassy in Beijing involving the Member for Farrer during which the Member for Farrer announced Australia's support for the 2008 Olympics being hosted in Beijing. (2) Do the Member for Farrer's views officially represent the attitude of the Australian Government.(3) Has the Government previously announced its attitude to Beijing hosting the 2008 Olympics.(4) Does such an announcement pre-empt the decision and rights of the Australian International Olympic Committee (IOC) delegation to the 2001 Moscow IOC meeting where a decision about the 2008 Olympics will be made.(5) Will his Department's China-Australia Human Rights Dialogue be consulted about the Government's attitude towards Beijing hosting the 2008 Olympics.(6) If the Australian representatives of the Dialogue have been consulted about the suitability of Beijing as a site for the 2008 Olympics, what was their recommendation.26751Downer, Alexander, MPMr Downer4G4MayoLPMinister for Foreign Affairs10—The answer to the honourable member's question is as follows:(1) Yes.(2) No. The Member for Farrer visited Beijing as a private individual in the context of consultancy work which the ACT Government is conducting with its sister city Beijing in relation to environmental aspects of Beijing's bid for the 2008 Olympics, and as the former Mayor of the Paralympics Games Village in Sydney in 2000.(3) No.(4) Not applicable.(5) and (6) Beijing's bid for the 2008 Olympics was not discussed at the last meeting of the bilateral Australia-China Human Rights Dialogue in August 2000. The next meeting will likely be held in August 2001 and no agenda has yet been set.26751(Question No. 2378)237826751Latham, Mark, MPMr LathamK26WerriwaALP00 asked the Minister for Education, Training and Youth Affairs, upon notice, on 27 February 2001:(1) Will the Government's new Postgraduate Loan Education Scheme be made available to Australia's two private universities, Notre Dame University in Fremantle and Bond University on the Gold Coast.(2) What reasons can he give for the policy decision in referred to in part (1).26751Kemp, Dr David, MPDr KempBT4GoldsteinLPMinister for Education, Training and Youth Affairs and Minister Assisting the Prime Minister for the Public Service10—The answer to the honourable member's question is as follows:(1) The Postgraduate Education Loans Scheme will be available to Notre Dame University but will not be available to Bond University.(2) The Government has made the Postgraduate Education Loans Scheme available to students who are enrolled at universities which receive Commonwealth operating grant funding under the Higher Education Funding Act 1988 and have access to the Higher Education Contribution Scheme.26751(Question No. 2379)237926751Murphy, John, MPMr Murphy83DLoweALP00 asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs, upon notice, on 28 February 2001:(1) Is he able to say whether the British Government intends to proscribe the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) under the Anti-Terrorism Act 2000.(2) Is he able to define the criteria upon which an organisation under this Act is so proscribed.(3) Is he able to identify the rights upon which an organisation so proscribed may appeal such a decision; if so (a) what are those rights and (b) what is the procedure to be taken.(4) Is he able to identify the grounds upon which the LTTE have been nominated under the Act to be a proscribed organisation. (5) What is the Australian Government's declared position in relation to the LTTE.26752Downer, Alexander, MPMr Downer4G4MayoLPMinister for Foreign Affairs10—The answer to the honourable member's question is as follows:(1) Yes. The Home Secretary, Jack Straw, provided a parliamentary answer on 28 February which laid a draft order under section 123 (4) of the Terrorism Act 2000 recommending to Parliament that the LTTE and 20 other organisations be added to the list of proscribed organisations in schedule 2 of the Terrorism Act. The draft order is subject to the affirmative resolution procedure of the British Parliament. There will therefore be debate in both houses on the Home Secretary's recommendations. If approved by Parliament, the proscriptions will take effect on the day the Home Secretary signs the order. Proscription will make it illegal for proscribed organisations to meet, operate or carry out any activities in the UK.(2) Yes. Under section 3 (3) (A) of the Act, the Home Secretary may by order add an organisation to schedule 2 where he believes that it is concerned with terrorism as defined in section 1 of the Act.(3) Yes. Proscribed groups have a right of appeal. Firstly, they may appeal to the Home Secretary for de-proscription. Secondly, if that application is refused, they may appeal to the “Proscribed Organisations Appeal Commission”. This Commission has a special mandate to hear sensitive classified material. Such material will be protected by provisions which allow the advocates of the proscribed organisation to have access to it, but not the organisation or its members.(4) Yes. The following is the publicly available text which UK parliamentarians have available to assist their consideration of the draft order to proscribe the LTTE. As such, it constitutes the grounds upon which the LTTE have been nominated under the Act to be a proscribed organisation. “ Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE)Aims: The LTTE is a terrorist group fighting for a separate Tamil state in the north and east of Sri Lanka.History: The LTTE has been fighting since 1983. More than 60,000 people on all sides have been killed in the conflict.Attacks: The LTTE have mounted both a military assault and a terrorist campaign, the latter mainly in Colombo. Attacks are mostly targeted against Sri Lankan military and leading politicians using suicide bombers. Attempts to assassinate the Sri Lankan President in late 1999 and early 2000 were attributed to the LTTE by the media and the Sri Lankan authorities.Attacks on UK or Western interests: The LTTE has never targeted Western interests directly, though Westerners have been injured as a result of LTTE attacks in Sri Lanka. The LTTE's only attack outside Sri Lanka was the assassination of Rajiv Gandhi in 1991 in response to India's military support for Sri Lanka.Representations/Activities in the UK: The LTTE's international secretariat is based in the UK and is responsible for the group's press releases. The UK is also a source of funds for the LTTE.” (5) The Australian Government condemns and abhors the terrorist activities of the LTTE. The suicide bombing campaigns that the LTTE have launched, principally in Colombo, have not only aimed at assassinating Sri Lankan political and military figures, but also have been intended to cause the maximum amount of terror amongst the civilian population. While foreigners have not been the direct targets of LTTE attacks, on a number of occasions Australian citizens, including the staff of our High Commission in Colombo, have had narrow escapes from LTTE bombing attacks which have tended to be targeted at crowded public places. The LTTE gives no warning of its attacks and its explosive devices are designed to maximise death and injury.In 1996 I said in Parliament that I would not meet with Tamil groups unless they first renounced the LTTE's use of terror in writing.26752(Question No. 2383)238326752Sidebottom, Sid, MPMr Sidebottom849BraddonALP00 asked the Prime Minister, upon notice, on 1 March 2001:(1) Is the Minister's Department, or are agencies within the portfolio, large purchasers or consumers of office papers. (2) How are Commonwealth procurement guidelines being adhered to by the Minister's Department and agencies within the portfolio.(3) What methodology or weighting criteria does the Minister's Department and agencies use to determine the importance of the core principles which underpin the procurement guidelines, namely (a) value for money, (b) open and effective competition, (c) ethics and fair dealing, (d) accountability and reporting, (e) national competitiveness and industry development and (f) support for other Commonwealth policies.(4) What weighting criteria are used to implement the mandatory provisions in the guidelines which state that agencies must be able to demonstrate that Australia New Zealand (ANZ) suppliers have had a fair opportunity to compete.(5) In inviting suppliers to tender for the provision of goods, are suppliers advised that they must offer ANZ goods.(6) If the Minister's Department or agencies within the portfolio do not have weighting criteria for determining the principles, will the Minister take steps to ensure that they provide an appropriate means to demonstrate their compliance with Commonwealth procurement policy.26753Howard, John, MPMr HowardZD4BennelongLPPrime Minister10—The answer to the honourable member's question is as follows:I am advised by my department as follows:For all agencies within the Portfolio(1) No.(2) The Department closely follows Commonwealth Government Procurement Guidelines in the purchasing of all goods and services.(3) (a) to (f) No weighting to the core principles is applied when assessing procurement opportunities. For each purchasing activity, departmental officers are encouraged to use their judgement in ensuring all of the procurement core principles of the Commonwealth Procurement Guidelines are adhered to.(4) For each purchasing decision, the Department considers each of the core procurement principles, including the requirement to ensure Australian and New Zealand suppliers have fair opportunity to compete for departmental business.(5) No. However in each procurement decision the department remains conscious of the principle relating to open and fair competition and government policy supporting the development of competitive Australian and New Zealand Industries.(6) The attention of all staff involved in procurement activity is drawn to the departmental Chief Executive Instructions, which provide detailed guidance in relation to the Commonwealth Procurement Guidelines.26753(Question No. 2385)238526753Sidebottom, Sid, MPMr Sidebottom849BraddonALP00 asked the Minister representing the Treasurer, upon notice, on 1 March 2001:(1) Is the Minister's Department, or are agencies within the portfolio, large purchasers or consumers of office papers.(2) How are Commonwealth procurement guidelines being adhered to by the Minister's Department and agencies within the portfolio.(3) What methodology or weighting criteria does the Minister's Department and agencies use to determine the importance of the core principles which underpin the procurement guidelines, namely (a) value for money, (b) open and effective competition, (c) ethics and fair dealing, (d) accountability and reporting, (e) national competitiveness and industry development and (f) support for other Commonwealth policies.(4) What weighting criteria are used to implement the mandatory provisions in the guidelines which state that agencies must be able to demonstrate that Australia New Zealand (ANZ) suppliers have had a fair opportunity to compete. (5) In inviting suppliers to tender for the provision of goods, are suppliers advised that they must offer ANZ goods.(6) If the Minister's Department or agencies within the portfolio do not have weighting criteria for determining the principles, will the Minister take steps to ensure that they provide an appropriate means to demonstrate their compliance with Commonwealth procurement policy.26754Kemp, Sen RodSenator KempWW4VictoriaLPAssistant Treasurer10—The answer to the honourable member's question is as follows:Department of the Treasury(1) The Department of the Treasury (Treasury) purchased approximately 7,160 reams of paper during the financial year 1999-2000.(2) Treasury applies the Commonwealth Procurement Guidelines.(3) Treasury applies a rating scale specific to the tender request. The criteria developed for each tender process are underpinned by these six core procurement principles and weighted accordingly.(4) Treasury Procurement guidelines require Departmental Procurement Officers investigate ANZ industry capability and provide fair opportunity for ANZ suppliers to compete.(5) Tenderer's for supply of goods are not advised they must offer ANZ goods. However, fair opportunity is provided for ANZ suppliers to compete as outlined in 4 above.(6) Treasury applies weighting to tender evaluation criteria as outlined in 3 above.Australian Bureau of Statistics(1) The Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) uses approximately 40,000 reams of office paper per annum.(2) ABS Chief Executive Instructions make reference to the Guidelines. The ABS actively trains its procurement staff and has undertaken internal audits and reviews of the purchasing function, to ensure that purchasing activities are consistent with the Commonwealth Procurement Guidelines.(3) ABS does not weight the core principles, which underpin the procurement guidelines, but does use weighting systems that ultimately achieve outcomes consistent with the principles. However, the primary objective of the ABS is achieving value for money in a manner consistent with the other core principles of the Guidelines.(4) The ABS encourages competition from ANZ suppliers through active local advertising, market research, and by preparing specifications which are not discriminatory, consistent with the Commonwealth Procurement Guidelines.(5) The ABS does not specify that suppliers must offer ANZ goods, as this would be inconsistent with the Commonwealth Procurement Guidelines.(6) See response to (2).Australian Competition and Consumer Commission(1) The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (the Commission) uses approximately 11,600 reams of paper per annum.(2) The Commission follows the Commonwealth Procurement Guidelines.(3) The Commission applies equal weighting for (a) value for money, (b) open and effective competition (c) fair dealing and (d) accountability.(4) The Commission does not weight ANZ suppliers, but supply of ANZ goods is encouraged.(5) The Commission does not advise tenderer's they must offer ANZ goods but they are encouraged to do so.(6) The Commission applies weighting in accordance with (3) above.Australian Prudential Regulatory Authority(1) Australian Prudential Regulatory Authority (APRA) uses approximately 4,320 reams of paper per annum.(2) APRA procurement methods are consistent with Commonwealth Procurement Guidelines as Government contracts for suppliers are used when possible. (3) In most cases value for money is the highest weighted criteria.(4) APRA provides fair opportunity to all suppliers.(5) No, however refer to question 4.(6) Refer to question 3.Australian Securities and Investments Commission(1) The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) uses approximately 96,000 reams of paper per annum.(2) All significant purchases, including office supplies, are subject to a tender process where core principles are adopted; otherwise for minor procurement, the principles that underpin the procurement guidelines are generally adhered to.(3) In most instances all these principles underpin the agency's procurement decisions. However, no single methodology or weighting criteria is used to determine importance.(4) No weighting criteria are used however all significant procurement specifications and evaluation criteria are drafted to ensure ANZ suppliers have had a fair opportunity to compete.(5) Yes.(6) ASIC applies weighting to tender evaluation criteria as outlined in 3 above.Australian Taxation Office(1) The Australian Taxation Office (ATO) has purchased 206,644 reams of Australian paper in the financial year up to the date of this question.(2) The ATO has established Accredited Procurement Units (APU) to ensure that the Commonwealth procurement guidelines and the ATO's procurement policies and procedures are adhered to. The ATO's Chief Executive Instructions also support and reinforce the Commonwealth procurement guidelines.(3) The ATO's process requires approval by both the Financial Management Act (FMA) delegate and the APU. An officer from the APU units reviews all documentation and approves the procurement process to ensure that, amongst other requirements, the Commonwealth and ATO procurement guidelines, policies and processes are followed including the principles detailed.The principles outlined are in the main included in the criteria against which proposals are assessed.(4) The ATO ensures that ANZ suppliers have had a fair opportunity to compete· In the tender documents ATO makes clear reference to expectations of suppliers in the use of ANZ products and services, and· In their response tenderers are required to declare acceptance of the Commonwealth Government's requirements.(5) The ATO's tender documentation states the Commonwealth Government's requirements in relation to ANZ products and services. Tenderers are required to state that they are prepared to accept the Commonwealth Government's requirements.(6) The ATO's policy and procedures comply with the Commonwealth Government's procurement policy.National Competition Council(1) The National Competition Council (Council) uses approximately 600 reams of paper per annum.(2) All significant purchases, including office supplies, are subject to a tender process where core principles are adopted; otherwise for minor procurement, the principles that underpin the procurement guidelines are generally adhered to.(3) Council rates value for money higher than the other core principles. A variable rating scale is applied the remaining core principles depending on the good or service required.(4) Council implements the procurement guidelines.(5) Council does not advise tenderer's they must offer ANZ goods but they are encouraged to do so.(6) Council applies ratings as outlined in (3) above. Productivity Commission(1) The Productivity Commission (PC) uses approximately 6,400 reams of paper per annum.(2) PC has particular regard to section 44 of the FMA Act that agency chief executives promote an efficient, effective and ethical use of Commonwealth resources. This requirement generally aligns with criterion (a) of the Commonwealth procurement guidelines that purchasing decisions reflect `value for money'. In practice, this means evaluating quotes from a number of suppliers taking into account the best value for money criterion to ensure the best available outcome for the Commission.(3) PC applies the greatest weight to the value for money criterion, with consideration to other criteria as appropriate.(4) PC's procurement approach provides an opportunity for ANZ suppliers to quote.(5) Suppliers are advised that ANZ goods must be offered.(6) Not applicable.Royal Australian Mint(1) The Royal Australian Mint (RAM) used approximately 1596 reams during 1999-2000.(2) RAM follows Commonwealth Procurement Guidelines.(3) RAM does not weight the core principles but does use weighting systems that achieve outcomes consistent with the principles. The primary focus is to achieve value for money consistent with the other core principles.(4) Procurement officers are required to investigate and encourage supply of ANZ goods.(5) Yes.(6) RAM complies with Commonwealth Procurement Guidelines see (3) above.26756(Question No. 2387)238726756Sidebottom, Sid, MPMr Sidebottom849BraddonALP00 asked the Minister representing the Minister for the Environment and Heritage, upon notice, on 1 March 2001:(1) Is the Minister's Department, or are agencies within the portfolio, large purchasers or consumers of office papers.(2) How are Commonwealth procurement guidelines being adhered to by the Minister's Department and agencies within the portfolio.(3) What methodology or weighting criteria does the Minister's Department and agencies use to determine the importance of the core principles which underpin the procurement guidelines, namely (a) value for money, (b) open and effective competition, (c) ethics and fair dealing, (d) accountability and reporting, (e) national competitiveness and industry development and (f) support for other Commonwealth policies.(4) What weighting criteria are used to implement the mandatory provisions in the guidelines which state that agencies must be able to demonstrate that Australia New Zealand (ANZ) suppliers have had a fair opportunity to compete.(5) In inviting suppliers to tender for the provision of goods, are suppliers advised that they must offer ANZ goods.(6) If the Minister's Department or agencies within the portfolio do not have weighting criteria for determining the principles, will the Minister take steps to ensure that they provide an appropriate means to demonstrate their compliance with Commonwealth procurement policy.26756Truss, Warren, MPMr TrussGT4Wide BayNPMinister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry10—The Minister for the Environment and Heritage has provided the following answer to the honourable member's question:(1) As an example of paper consumption within my portfolio, my department and portfolio agencies used approximately 30,000 reams of office paper and 130 boxes of continuous computer paper in the 1999/2000 financial year. (2) My department and portfolio agencies have in place guidelines and working documents that reflect the Commonwealth Procurement Guidelines: Core Policies and Principles.(3) No standard methodology or weighting is applied by my department and portfolio agencies. Each individual procurement has selection criteria that seek to ensure that best value for money is attained and that other requirements in the Commonwealth Procurement Guidelines: Core Policies and Principles are adhered to.(4) See answer to question 3. It should be noted that procurement by my department and portfolio agencies is generally sourced from within Australia and/or New Zealand.My department and portfolio agencies comply with the Commonwealth Procurement Guidelines: Core Policies and Principles.(6) See answers to questions 4 and 5.26757(Question No. 2390)239026757Sidebottom, Sid, MPMr Sidebottom849BraddonALP00 asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs, upon notice, on 1 March 2001:(1) Is the Minister's Department, or are agencies within the portfolio, large purchasers or consumers of office papers.(2) How are the Commonwealth Procurement Guidelines being adhered to by the Minister's Department and agencies within the portfolio.(3) What methodology or weighting criteria does the Minister's Department and agencies use to determine the importance of the core principles which underpin the procurement guidelines, namely, (a) value for money, (b) open and effective competition, (c) ethic and fair dealing, (d) accountability and reporting, (e) national competitiveness and industry development and (f) support for other Commonwealth policies.(4) What weighting criteria are used to implement the mandatory provisions in the guidelines which state that agencies must be able to demonstrate that Australia New Zealand (ANZ) suppliers have had a fair opportunity to compete.(5) In inviting suppliers to tender for the provisions of goods, are suppliers advised that they must offer ANZ goods.(6) If the Minister's Departments or agencies within the portfolio do not have weighting criteria for determining the principles, will the Minister take steps to ensure that they provide an appropriate means to demonstrate their compliance with Commonwealth procurement policy.26757Downer, Alexander, MPMr Downer4G4MayoLPMinister for Foreign Affairs10—The answer to the honourable member's question in relation to the portfolio of Foreign Affairs and Trade is as follows:(1) In 1999-2000 the Foreign Affairs and Trade portfolio purchased approximately 48,000 reams of Australian-made paper in Canberra.(2) Portfolio agencies' in-house procurement instructions accord fully with the Commonwealth Procurement Guidelines (CPGs).(3) The core principles underpin all procurement activity within the portfolio. They are contained in all instructions and guidelines provided to all staff involved in procurement.(4) The portfolio does not discriminate against ANZ suppliers. Standard tender documentation encourages ANZ suppliers to bid and in some instances, only ANZ suppliers are invited to bid.(5) Standard tender documentation requires potential suppliers to supply only ANZ products wherever possible or identify the ANZ content of the goods to be supplied.(6) Portfolio methodologies conform fully with Commonwealth Procurement Policy.26758(Question No. 2392)239226758Sidebottom, Sid, MPMr Sidebottom849BraddonALP00 asked the Minister representing the Minister for Finance and Administration, upon notice, on 1 March 2001:(1) Is the Minister's Department, or are Agencies within the Portfolio, large purchasers or consumers of office papers.(2) How are Commonwealth procurement guidelines being adhered to by the Minister's Department and Agencies with the Portfolio.(3) What methodology or weighting criteria does the Minister's Department and Agencies use to determine the importance of the core principles which underpin the procurement guidelines, namely (a) value for money, (b) open and effective competition, (c) ethics and fair dealing, (d) accountability and reporting, (e) national competitiveness and industry development and (f) support for other Commonwealth policies.(4) What weighting criteria are used to implement the mandatory provisions in the guidelines which state that agencies must be able to demonstrate that Australia New Zealand (ANZ) suppliers have had a fair opportunity to compete.(5) In inviting suppliers to tender for the provision of goods, are suppliers advised that they must offer ANZ goods.(6) If the Minister's Department or Agencies within the Portfolio do not have weighting criteria for determining the principles, will the Minister take steps to ensure that they provide and appropriate means to demonstrate their compliance with Commonwealth procurement policy.26758Costello, Peter, MPMr CostelloCT4HigginsLPTreasurer10—The answer to the honourable member's question is as follows:(1) The Portfolio consumes office paper. Consumption fluctuates throughout the year and is dependant upon timing and the particular activities being undertaken.(2) All procurement within my Portfolio is carried out in accordance with both the Commonwealth Procurement Guidelines: Core Policies and Principles 1998 and the Financial Management and Accountability Act 1997. As advised in the 1999-2000 DOFA Annual Report, to enhance compliance of the Commonwealth Procurement Guidelines, an explanation of their importance in providing fundamental directions for government procurement was included in DOFA's Chief Executive Instructions.(3) In accordance with the Commonwealth Procurement Guidelines: Core Policies and Principles 1998, the Portfolio follows the core principles of government procurement as a means to efficiently and effectively deliver the Government's programmes.(4) In line with the Commonwealth Procurement Guidelines: Core Policies and Principles 1998, the Portfolio's tender documentation promotes the development of ANZ industry by means that are consistent with the achievement of value for money objectives.(5) See answer to Question (4).(6) In accordance with the Commonwealth Procurement Guidelines: Core Policies and Principles 1998, the Portfolio follows the core principles of government procurement as a means to efficiently and effectively deliver the Government's programmes.In accordance with annual reporting requirements, the Portfolio reports against an “Assessment of Performance against Purchasing Policies”.For the 1990 -2000 Annual Report, DOFA advised the following:“The Internal Audit Unit conducts probity reviews of DOFA's contracting arrangements to ensure compliance with the general probity principles of the Commonwealth Procurement Guidelines and Chief Executive Instructions. During 1999-2000, Internal Audit conducted 180 probity reviews within DOFA. All reviews ensured a defensible purchasing outcome in accordance with Commonwealth Procurement Guidelines and supporting policy and principles”.26759(Question No. 2394)239426759Sidebottom, Sid, MPMr Sidebottom849BraddonALP00 asked the Minister representing the Minister for Industry, Science and Resources, upon notice, on 1 March 2001:(1) Is the Minister's Department, or are agencies within the portfolio, large purchasers or consumers of office papers.(2) How are Commonwealth procurement guidelines being adhered to by the Minister's Department and agencies within the portfolio.(3) What methodology or weighting criteria does the Minister's Department and agencies use to determine the importance of the core principles which underpin the procurement guidelines, namely (a) value for money, (b) open and effective competition, (c) ethics and fair dealing, (d) accountability and reporting, (e) national competitiveness and industry development and (f) support for other Commonwealth policies.(4) What weighting criteria are used to implement the mandatory provisions in the guidelines which state that agencies must be able to demonstrate that Australia New Zealand (ANZ) suppliers have had a fair opportunity to compete.(5) In inviting suppliers to tender for the provision of goods, are suppliers advised that they must offer ANZ goods.(6) If the Minister's Department or agencies within the portfolio do not have weighting criteria for determining the principles, will the Minister take steps to ensure that they provide an appropriate means to demonstrate their compliance with Commonwealth procurement policy.26759Reith, Peter, MPMr ReithWI4FlindersLPMinister for Defence10—The Minister for Industry, Science and Resources has provided the following answer to the honourable member's question:The Department of Industry, Science and Resources(1) The Department of Industry, Science and Resources purchases and consumes approximately $140,000 of office paper per annum for printing, faxing and photocopying.(2) The Department's Chief Executive Instructions specify that Purchasing Officials should comply with the Commonwealth Procurement Guidelines. The Department's Procedural Rules, which contain more detailed guidance, specify the core principles and policies of procurement and detail the website for accessing the Commonwealth Procurement Guidelines proper.(3) The Department does not apply a weighting or methodology to any particular principle of the guidelines. The Commonwealth Procurement Guidelines treat all the principles with equal importance.(4) No criteria is used to demonstrate that Australia New Zealand (ANZ) suppliers have had a fair opportunity to compete for goods and services with the Department. However, the Department's Procedural Rules specify that wherever possible Purchasing Officials should actively seek out ANZ suppliers. This does not mean discriminating against foreign suppliers, but giving ANZ suppliers the opportunity to compete.(5) Suppliers are not advised that they must offer ANZ goods. The Department complies with Government policy not to draw up contracts so as to exclude ANZ goods, nor to evaluate tenders in a manner that is biased against ANZ suppliers.(6) The Department currently conducts contract management training which addresses the key principles of the Commonwealth Procurement Guidelines. It also ensures its staff are fully conversant with the Chief Executive Instructions, Procedural Rules and Commonwealth Procurement Guidelines in conducting all forms of purchasing activity.IP Australia(1) IP Australia is a moderately large purchaser and consumer of paper, commensurate with the size of the organisation.(2) IP Australia has an accredited Central Purchasing Unit, which oversights adherence to the Commonwealth Procurement Guidelines throughout the organisation. It is staffed by accredited purchasing officers. IP Australia also has Chief Executive Instructions relating to purchasing that supplement the Commonwealth Procurement Guidelines. (3) (a) IP Australia uses weighted evaluation criteria to assess tenders on the basis of value for money.(b) The IP Australia procurement instructions have benchmarks based on the estimated value of the purchases for determining the most effective and practical method of seeking quotes and tenders.(c) Staff involved in purchasing attend courses in procurement ethics and the Central Purchasing Unit oversights issues of ethics and fair dealings throughout the organisation.(d) IP Australia has Chief Executive Instructions to cover purchasing and reports purchases of more that $2000 in the Commonwealth Gazette.(e) IP Australia supports the development of ANZ industry as set out in the responses to Question 4 and 5.(f) IP Australia supports Commonwealth policies as set out in Section 6 of the Commonwealth Procurement Guidelines.(4) IP Australia structures its tendering strategies to ensure ANZ suppliers have a fair opportunity to complete and to seek out ANZ products consistent with achieving value for money wherever possible.(5) IP Australia buys ANZ products where they represent the best value for money. For instance, we negotiated with the preferred tenderer for the supply of stationery to use an Australian manufacturer for the organisation's bulk paper supplies.(6) IP Australia has policies and practices in place to achieve compliance with the Commonwealth Procurement Guidelines.Australian Geological Survey Organisation(1) The Australian Geological Survey Organisation (AGSO) is not a large purchaser or consumer of office paper.(2) As a prescribed agency under the Financial Management and Accountability Act 1997, AGSO has established a set of Chief Executive Instructions (CEIs) governing day to day purchasing activity and policy. The CEIs follow the Commonwealth Procurement Guidelines.(3) AGSO's CEIs do not require that a percentage weighting be given to the core principles in the procurement guidelines, nor do the Commonwealth Procurement Guidelines require such an approach.(4) As stated above, weightings are not required. In all AGSO procurement, the principles of value for money, open and effective competition and support for industry are observed at all times. Open and effective competition is the main vehicle for ensuring opportunity to compete.(5) As stated above, AGSO follows the Commonwealth Procurement Guidelines through its CEIs. AGSO's Request for Tender documentation includes reference to the Commonwealth's requirement in respect of Australian and New Zealand supplies.(6) The Commonwealth Procurement Guidelines do not require the application of weighting to the core principles.Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO)(1) No, because two thirds of CSIRO is engaged in research and it is not primarily an administrative body. Specific information on paper purchases and consumption is not available without significant resources being allocated to contacting each of CSIRO's sixty sites.(2 to 6) As an agency under the Commonwealth Authorities and Companies Act 1997, CSIRO is not subject to the Commonwealth Procurement Guidelines. However, the key principles of the Commonwealth Procurement Guidelines are included in the CSIRO procurement policy.The prime objective of CSIRO's purchasing activity is to provide goods and services to support CSIRO's functions while obtaining value for money and while adhering to CSIRO policy. The Government's policy, which is intended to give increased access for Australian and New Zealand suppliers of goods and services, is included in CSIRO's procurement policy.The most cost effective method of purchasing is chosen for each occasion depending on what is being bought, the value of the purchase, and the range of potential suppliers. In most cases this is achieved through obtaining multiple quotes, a formal tender process for purchases in excess of $50k, or accessing Government contracts. The resources needed to make the purchase is commensurate with the value, importance and complexity of the purchase. In order to maintain a reputation for fair and impartial dealing with suppliers and with those who bid for contracts to supply goods and services, CSIRO's policy requires the demonstration of high ethical standards and openness in the competitive acquisition process, commercial confidentiality, accountability, ensuring that there is fair and open competition, and (subject to the need for economy and efficiency) ensuring that all those who wish to and might be capable of supplying goods and services are given the opportunity to bid.In order to obtain value for money, there must be open and effective competition, clear specification or statement of requirements, and selection criteria preferably performance oriented and focussing on the outcome expected rather than specifying a particular way of satisfying the requirement.National Standards Commission(1) The National Standards Commission is a small purchaser of office paper, with expenditure estimated at $4,000 per annum.(2 to 6) As an Agency under the Commonwealth Authorities and Company Act 1997 the National Standards Commission is not subject to the Commonwealth Procurement Guidelines.The Commission's purchasing is based on value for money. It has included in it most recent Certified Agreement guidelines on official conduct which underpin all activities with a number of principles and values similar to those that apply in the APS to ethical and fair dealing.The small scale of the Commissions operation means it seldom goes to tender, with most purchasing the subject of competitive quotations from local businesses.Australian Sports Commission(1) The Australian Sports Commission (ASC) is not a large purchaser or consumer of office papers: its annual expenditure on these goods is about $45,000.(2 to 6) As an agency covered by the Commonwealth Authorities and Companies Act 1997, the ASC is not required to adhere to Commonwealth Procurement Guidelines. However, the ASC procurement procedures generally comply with the guidelines.Australian Sports Drug Agency(1) The Australian Sports Drug Agency (ASDA) purchases approximately, 650 reams of plain paper per annum and 80 reams of printed letterhead per annum.(2 to 6) As an agency under the Commonwealth Authorities and Companies Act 1997, ASDA is not subject to the Commonwealth Procurement Guidelines.Australian Tourist Commission(1) The Australian Tourist Commission (ATC) is a small purchaser of office paper.(2 to 6) As an agency under the Commonwealth Authorities and Companies Act 1997, the ATC is not subject to the Commonwealth Procurement Guidelines.Australian Institute of Marine Science(1) The Australian Institute of Marine Science (AIMS) is a small purchaser/consumer of office papers with expenditure of approximately $15,000pa.(2 to 6) As an agency under the Commonwealth Authorities and Companies Act 1997, AIMS is not subject to the Commonwealth Procurement Guidelines. However, AIMS Purchasing Policy is consistent with the Commonwealth Procurement Guidelines.AIMS Purchasing Policy requires that all purchases over the value of $30,000 must go to public tender, which facilitates compliance with the principles which underpin these procurement guidelines. In addition, each purchase over $100,000 must be referred to the Minister for review and approval.AIMS promotes the purchases of local and ANZ goods as a preference. Australian Nuclear Science Technology Organisation(1) The Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation (ANSTO) currently uses approximately 14,000 reams of office paper per annum.(2 to 6) As an agency under the Commonwealth Authorities and Companies Act 1997, ANSTO is not subject to the Commonwealth Procurement Guidelines. However ANSTO's purchasing policy is broadly consistent with the Commonwealth Procurement Guidelines.ANSTO continually evaluates samples provided by suppliers, which facilitates compliance with the principles that underpin the procurement guidelines. Quality and value are the prime criteria. If an Australian/New Zealand supplier can consistently meet these requirements, ANSTO will purchase from that supplier.ANSTO uses the following standard clause in procurement documentation:ANZ Preference - In the provision of Supplies the Contractor shall not exclude Australian or New Zealand goods and services that are suitable, or adaptable to ANSTO's needs, and shall give the fullest consideration to purchasing Australian and New Zealand Supplies representing value for money.26762(Question No. 2395)239526762Sidebottom, Sid, MPMr Sidebottom849BraddonALP00 asked the Attorney-General, upon notice, on 1 March 2001:(1) Is the Minister's Department, or are agencies within the portfolio, large purchasers or consumers of office papers.(2) How are Commonwealth procurement guidelines being adhered to by the Minister's Department and agencies within the portfolio.(3) What methodology or weighting criteria does the Minister's Department and agencies use to determine the importance of the core principles which underpin the procurement guidelines, namely (a) value for money, (b) open and effective competition, (c) ethics and fair dealing, (d) accountability and reporting, (e) national competitiveness and industry development and (f) support for other Commonwealth policies.(4) What weighting criteria are used to implement the mandatory provisions in the guidelines which state that agencies must be able to demonstrate that Australia New Zealand (ANZ) suppliers have had a fair opportunity to compete.(5) In inviting suppliers to tender for the provision of goods, are suppliers advised that they must offer ANZ goods.(6) If the Minister's Department or agencies within the portfolio do not have weighting criteria for determining the principles, will the Minister take steps to ensure that they provide an appropriate means to demonstrate their compliance with Commonwealth procurement policy.26762Williams, Daryl, MPMr Williams7V5TangneyLPAttorney-General10—The answer to the honourable member's question is as follows:For the purpose of answering the question office papers have been defined as photocopy and printer paper used to generate correspondence.Attorney-General's Department(1) During the 12 month period 1 March 2000 to 28 February 2001 the Department consumed an estimated 27,000 reams of photocopy and printer paper. (2) The Department's Chief Executive Instructions on Purchasing reflect Commonwealth Procurement Guidelines and staff are required to comply with them when undertaking purchasing activities.(3) The Department does not use a standard methodology or weighting criteria to determine the importance of the core principles, which underpin the procurement guidelines. However, in respect of the purchase of photocopy and printer paper, the Department treated all the core principles as mandatory. (4) The Department places a mandatory requirement on the paper being made in Australia and New Zealand. (5) Yes, it is a requirement of the procurement process.(6) The Commonwealth Procurement Guidelines are seen as an important part of the procurement process and the Department has issued instructions which reflect the Guidelines. An intranet site is also being developed which will ensure that staff involved in procurement activities are fully aware of their responsibilities in relation to Commonwealth procurement policy.Administrative Appeals Tribunal(1) During the 12 month period 1 March 2000 to 28 February 2001 the Tribunal consumed an estimated 6,000 reams of photocopy and printer paper. (2) The Tribunal's Chief Executive Instructions on Purchasing reflect Commonwealth Procurement Guidelines and staff are required to comply with them when undertaking purchasing activities.(3) The Tribunal does not use a standard methodology or weighting criteria to determine the importance of the core principles, which underpin the procurement guidelines. However, in respect of the purchase of photocopy and printer paper, the Tribunal treated all the core principles as mandatory. (4) The Tribunal encourages suppliers to offer paper manufactured in Australia and New Zealand on competitive terms to foreign made paper. However, there have been occasions where the on-balance value of foreign made papers has resulted in small purchases of foreign made paper. Most of the Tribunal's paper purchases are of Australian made paper.(5) Yes, it is a requirement of the procurement process.(6) The Commonwealth Procurement Guidelines are seen as an important part of the procurement process and the Tribunal has issued instructions which reflect the Guidelines. An intranet site is also being developed which will ensure that staff involved in procurement activities are fully aware of their responsibilities in relation to Commonwealth procurement policy and the Administrative Appeals Tribunal's Chief Executive Instructions.Australian Bureau of Criminal Intelligence(1) During the 12 month period 1 March 2000 to 28 February 2001 the Bureau consumed an estimated 800 reams of photocopy and printer paper. (2) The Bureau's Instructions on Purchasing reflect Commonwealth Procurement Guidelines and staff are required to comply with them when undertaking purchasing activities.(3) The Bureau does not use a standard methodology or weighting criteria to determine the importance of the core principles, which underpin the procurement guidelines. The Bureau is a small intergovernmental agency, partly funded within the Australian Federal Police (AFP) appropriation, that for efficiency purposes utilises AFP standing contracts where appropriate. This includes office paper purchases. Records indicate that the Bureau has consistently purchased Australian and New Zealand paper.(4) Refer (3).(5) Not applicable.(6) The Commonwealth Procurement Guidelines are seen as an important part of the procurement process and the Bureau utilises the AFP intranet that provides instructions and links on the Guidelines.Australian Customs Service(1) During the 12 month period 1 March 2000 to 28 February 2001 Customs consumed an estimated 51,000 reams of photocopy and printer paper. (2) The ACS Chief Executive Instructions to staff on purchasing reflect the Commonwealth Procurement Guidelines.(3) Customs does not use a standard methodology, or weighting criteria, to determine the importance of the core principles. For the purchase of photocopy and printer paper, all the core principles were treated as mandatory. (4) Customs places a mandatory requirement on the paper being made in Australia or New Zealand. (5) Tenderers are advised of the requirement to supply goods of Australian or New Zealand origin.(6) The Commonwealth Procurement Guidelines are an essential part of instructions to staff on purchasing. Customs has established an Accredited Purchasing Unit to assist staff undertaking tender processes and to assure compliance with Commonwealth procurement policy.Australian Federal Police(1) In the calendar year 2000, the Australian Federal Police (AFP) purchased an estimated 19,338 reams of photocopy and printer paper.(2) The AFP Commissioner's Financial Instructions on Procurement reflect Commonwealth Procurement Guidelines and General Managers are responsible for ensuring all staff have regard for them when procuring goods and services.(3) The AFP does not use a single methodology or weighting criteria to determine the importance of the core principles, which underpin the procurement guidelines. However, in respect of the purchase of photocopy and printer paper, the AFP tender process and evaluation criteria were underpinned by all the core principles. (4) In evaluating the tender for the supply of stationery, tenderers were required to provided details of content or Australian and New Zealand origin, of each item. Tenderers were also required to indicate if the business or company was Australian or New Zealand owned. Tenderers commitment to Australian and New Zealand products, especially Australian made copy paper, was evaluated as a significant factor in selecting a preferred supplier.(5) Yes, it is a requirement of the tender process.(6) The Commonwealth Procurement Guidelines are seen as an important part of the procurement process and the AFP Commissioner has issued instructions which reflect the Guidelines. A training program has been put in place to ensure that staff involved in procurement activities are fully aware of their responsibilities in relation to Commonwealth procurement policy. This training program is also supported by an Intranet site which has a link to the Department of Finance and Administration Competitive and Contracting website.Australian Institute of Criminology(1) During the 12 month period 1 March 2001 to 28 February 2001, the Institute consumed an estimated 1503 reams of photocopy and printer paper.(2) The Institutes's Chief Executive Instructions on Purchasing reflect Commonwealth Procurement Guidelines and staff are required to comply with them when undertaking purchasing activities.(3) The Institute does not use a standard methodology or weighting criteria to determine the importance of the core principles, which underpin the procurement guidelines. However, in respect of the purchase of photocopy and printer paper, the AIC treated all the core principles as mandatory.(4) The Institute requires competitive quotes for all purchases.(5) Yes, it is a requirement of the procurement process.(6) The Commonwealth Procurement Guidelines are seen as an important part of the procurement process and the Institute has issued instructions which reflect the guidelines.Australian Law Reform Commission(1) During the 12 month period 1 March 2000 to 28 February 2001 the Commission consumed an estimated 700 reams of photocopy and printer paper.(2) The Commission's purchasing practices reflect Commonwealth Procurement Guidelines.(3) The Commission does not use a standard methodology or weighting criteria to determine the importance of the core principles, which underpin the procurement guidelines. However, in respect of the purchase of photocopy and printer paper, the Commission treated all the core principles as mandatory.(4) The Commission places a mandatory requirement on the paper being made in Australia and New Zealand.(5) Yes, it is a requirement of the procurement process.(6) The Commission's procurement processes are in compliance with the Commonwealth Procurement Guidelines. Australian Security Intelligence Organisation(1) During the 12 month period 1 March 2000 to 28 February 2001 the Organisation consumed an estimated 7,953 reams of photocopy and printer paper.(2) The Organisation's instructions on purchasing reflect Commonwealth Procurement Guidelines and staff are required to comply with those policies when undertaking purchasing activities.(3) The Organisation does not use a standard methodology or weighting criteria to determine the importance of the core principles which underpin the procurement guidelines. However, in respect of the purchase of photocopy and printing paper, the Organisation treated all the core principles as mandatory.(4) The Organisation places a mandatory requirement on the paper being made in Australia or New Zealand. However, when a specific paper type cannot be provided by Australian or New Zealand providers, the specialist paper is sourced from other providers. Paper sourced from non-ANZ providers would represent only about 2% of the Organisation's total paper consumption.(5) In inviting tenders for the provision of goods, suppliers are advised that they must offer ANZ goods.(6) Commonwealth Procurement Guidelines are available to all the Organisation's staff on CDROM via the internal computer network. Staff involved in the activity of procurement are fully aware of their responsibilities in relation to Commonwealth procurement policy.Australian Transaction Reports and Analysis Centre(1) During the 12 month period 1 March 2000 to 28 February 2001 the Agency consumed an estimated 1,500 reams of photocopy and printer paper. (2) The Agency's Chief Executive Instructions on Purchasing reflect Commonwealth Procurement Core Policies and Principles and staff are required to comply with them when undertaking purchasing activities.(3) The Agency does not use a standard methodology or weighting criteria to determine the importance of the core principles, which underpin the procurement guidelines. However, in respect of the purchase of photocopy and printer paper, the Agency treated all the core principles as mandatory. (4) The Agency places a mandatory requirement on the paper being made in Australia and New Zealand.(5) Yes, it is a requirement of the procurement process.(6) The Commonwealth Procurement Guidelines are seen as an important part of the procurement process and the Agency has issued instructions which reflect the Guidelines. An intranet site has been developed which ensures that staff involved in procurement activities are fully aware of their responsibilities in relation to Commonwealth procurement policy.Family Court of Australia(1) During the 12 month period 1 March 2000 to 28 February 2001 the Court consumed an estimated 15,000 reams of photocopy and printer paper.(2) The Court's Chief Executive Instructions on Purchasing reflect Commonwealth Procurement Guidelines and staff are required to comply with them when undertaking purchasing activities.(3) The Court's Chief Executive Instructions on Purchasing place particular emphasis on value for money and open and effective competition, and requires reference by delegates to the Commonwealth Procurement Guidelines.(4) Tender processes place emphasis on value for money and open and effective competition. All requests for tender include a clause that outlines a preference for Australia New Zealand suppliers and goods.(5) The Court does not specify that only Australia New Zealand goods must be offered, but it does include in all requests for tender standard text regarding a preference for Australia New Zealand suppliers and goods. (6) The Commonwealth Procurement Guidelines are seen as an important part of the procurement process. The Court reviews the Chief Executive Instructions regularly to ensure they comply with Commonwealth Procurement Guidelines. All instructions are available from the Court's intranet site.Federal Court of Australia(1) During the 12 month period 1 March 2000 to 28 February 2001 the Court purchased an estimated 16,172 reams of photocopy and printer paper.(2) The Court's Chief Executive Instructions require that staff comply with the Commonwealth procurement guidelines.(3) The Court does not use a standard methodology or weighting criteria to determine the importance of the core principles. It is considered that the purchasing process required by the Chief Executive Instructions satisfies all of the core principles.(4) No weighting criteria are used to implement the requirement that agencies must be able to demonstrate that Australia New Zealand suppliers have had a fair opportunity to compete. It is considered that the purchasing process required by the Chief Executive Instructions provides a fair opportunity for Australia and New Zealand suppliers to compete.(5) Yes, however the Court does purchase paper from locations other than Australia or New Zealand where the paper is required for a specialised purpose, ie. formal letterhead. These purchases account for less than 1% of all paper purchased by the Court. (6) The Commonwealth Procurement Guidelines are seen as an important part of the procurement process and the Court has issued instructions to reflect the Guidelines.Federal Magistrates Service(1) During the 12 month period 1 March 2000 to 28 February 2001 the Service consumed an estimated 640 reams of photocopy and printer paper. (2) The Service's Chief Executive Instructions on Purchasing reflect Commonwealth Procurement Guidelines and staff are required to comply with them when undertaking purchasing activities.(3) The Service does not use a standard methodology or weighting criteria to determine the importance of the core principles, which underpin the procurement guidelines.(4) The Service places a mandatory requirement on the paper being made in Australia and New Zealand.(5) Yes, it is a requirement of the procurement process.(6) The Commonwealth Procurement Guidelines are seen as an important part of the procurement process. Staff involved in procurement activities are required to be fully aware of their responsibilities in relation to Commonwealth procurement policy.High Court of Australia(1) During the 12 month period 1 March 2000 to 28 February 2001, the High Court consumed approximately 3,700 reams of office paper.(2) The High Court's Administrative Procedures, approved by the Chief Executive and Principal Registrar, reflect applicable provisions of the Commonwealth Procurement Guidelines. Staff of the High Court are required to comply with these procedures when undertaking purchasing activities.(3) The High Court does not use weighting criteria in the purchase of office papers, however the core principles of the Purchasing Guidelines are treated as mandatory.(4) The High Court purchases only office papers made in Australia or New Zealand.(5) Yes, it is a mandatory requirement.(6) The High Court's purchasing policies comply with all applicable requirements of Commonwealth procurement policy.Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission(1) During the 12 month period 1 March 2000 to 28 February 2001 the Commission consumed an estimated 2,647 reams of photocopy and printer paper.(2) The Commission's Chief Executive Instructions on purchasing reflect Commonwealth Procurement Guidelines and staff are required to comply with them when undertaking purchasing activities.(3) The Commission does not use a standard methodology or weighting criteria to determine the importance of the core principles, which underpin the procurement guidelines. However, in respect of the purchase of photocopy and printer paper, the Commission treated all the core principles as mandatory.(4) The Commission places a mandatory requirement on the paper being made in Australia and New Zealand.(5) Yes, it is a requirement of the procurement process.(6) The Commonwealth Procurement Guidelines are seen as an important part of the procurement process and the Commission has issued instructions which reflect the Guidelines.Insolvency and Trustee Service Australia(1) During the 12 month period 1 March 2000 to 28 February 2001 ITSA consumed an estimated 8,600 reams of photocopy and printer paper.(2) ITSA's Chief Executive Instructions reflect Commonwealth Procurement Guidelines and staff are required to comply with them when undertaking purchasing activities.(3) ITSA does not use a standard methodology or weighting criteria to determine the importance of the core principles, which underpin the procurement guidelines. All the core principles are treated as mandatory.(4) ITSA does not use weighting criteria. It is a mandatory requirement that ITSA is able to demonstrate that ANZ suppliers have had fair opportunity to compete, where overseas goods are purchased in preference to ANZ goods.(5) Yes, it is a requirement of the procurement process.(6) The Commonwealth Procurement Guidelines are seen as an important part of ITSA's procurement process and the Chief Executive has issued instructions which reflect the Guidelines. An intranet site has been developed to ensure that staff involved in procurement activities have access to, and are fully aware of, their responsibilities in relation to Commonwealth procurement policy.National Crime Authority(1) During the 12 month period 1 March 2000 to 28 February 2001 the NCA consumed an estimated 9,938 reams of photocopy and printer paper. (2) The NCA's Chief Executive Instructions on Purchasing reflect Commonwealth Procurement Guidelines and staff are required to comply with them when undertaking purchasing activities.(3) The NCA does not use a standard methodology or weighting criteria to determine the importance of the core principles, which underpin the procurement guidelines. However, in respect of the purchase of photocopy and printer paper, the NCA treated all the core principles as mandatory. (4) The NCA places a mandatory requirement that Australia and New Zealand suppliers have had a fair opportunity to compete.(5) Yes, it is a requirement of the procurement process.(6) The Commonwealth Procurement Guidelines are seen as an important part of the procurement process and the NCA has instructions which reflect the Guidelines.National Native Title Tribunal(1) During the twelve month period to 31 March 2001 the Tribunal consumed an estimated 5000 reams of photocopy and printer paper.(2) The Tribunal's Chief Executive Instructions reflect Commonwealth Procurement Guidelines and staff are required to comply with them when purchasing. (3) The Tribunal does not use a weighting methodology to determine the importance of core procurement principles. All procurement policies and guidelines are treated as mandatory. (4) The Tribunal has a requirement that all paper purchased be made in Australia or New Zealand.(5) Yes, it is part of the procurement process.(6) The Commonwealth Procurement Guidelines are seen as an important part of the procurement process and the Tribunal applies the procurement policies as part of purchasing practice.Office of Director of Public Prosecutions(1) During the 12 month period 1 March 2000 to 28 February 2001 the Office consumed an estimated 16,300 reams of photocopy and printer paper.(2) The Director's Financial Instructions require officers to have regard to the Commonwealth Procurement Guidelines when undertaking purchasing activities.(3) The Office does not use a standard methodology or weighting criteria to determine the importance of the core principles, which underpin the procurement guidelines. However, in respect of the purchase of photocopy and printer paper, the Office treated all core principles as mandatory.(4) Value for money is seen as the prime objective.(5) No.(6) The Commonwealth Procurement Guidelines are seen as an important part of the procurement process and the Office has instructions which reflect the Guidelines.Office of Film and Literature Classification(1) The Office of Film and Literature Classification (OFLC) consumes approximately 650 reams of photocopy/printer paper each year.(2) The OFLC's Chief Executive Instructions on Purchasing reflect Commonwealth Procurement Guidelines and staff are required to comply with them when undertaking purchasing activities.(3) The OFLC does not use a standard methodology or weighting criteria to determine the importance of the core principles which underpin the procurement guidelines. However, in respect of the purchase of photocopy and printer paper, the OFLC treated all the core principles as mandatory.(4) The OFLC applies all core principles of the Commonwealth Procurement Guidelines, and although no formal weighting criteria are applied to purchasing activities, staff involved are aware of their responsibility to promote national competitive advantage and to develop Australia New Zealand industry.(5) Wherever possible, Australia New Zealand product is specified.(6) All staff of the OFLC have been made aware of their responsibility to comply with the Commonwealth Procurement Guidelines.Office of Parliamentary Counsel(1) During the 12 month period 1 March 2000 to 28 February 2001 the Office of Parliamentary Counsel (OPC) purchased 2,660 reams of paper.(2) OPC's purchasing policies/guidelines reflect the Commonwealth Procurement Guidelines.(3) OPC has not defined standard weighting criteria to determine the application of the core principles. In the case of photocopy and printer paper, a history of machine failure related to paper quality has resulted in a decision to apply more weight to the quality of the product than the price of the product. This decision was taken to ensure that urgent printing (to enable draft legislation to be tabled in Parliament) was not delayed due to preventable machine failures.(4) and (5) OPC does not place a mandatory requirement for the paper to be made in Australia but suppliers are requested to provide quotes on a range of papers meeting the quality standards.(6) The Commonwealth Procurement Guidelines are an important component of OPC's internal controls and internal procurement policies reflect those Guidelines.Office of the Privacy Commissioner(1) The Office commenced operations on 1 July 2000. For the period 1 July 2000 to 28 February 2001 the Office consumed an estimated 275 reams of photocopy and printer paper.(2) The Office's Chief Executive Instructions on purchasing reflect Commonwealth Procurement Guidelines and staff are required to comply with them when undertaking purchasing activities. (3) The Office does not use a standard methodology or weighting criteria to determine the importance of the core principles, which underpin the procurement guidelines. However, in respect of the purchase of photocopy and printer paper, the Office treated all the core principles as mandatory.(4) The Office places a mandatory requirement on the paper being made in Australia and New Zealand.(5) Yes, it is a requirement of the procurement process.(6) The Commonwealth Procurement Guidelines are seen as an important part of the procurement process and the Office has issued instructions which reflect the Guidelines.26769(Question No. 2398)239826769Sidebottom, Sid, MPMr Sidebottom849BraddonALP00 asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, upon notice, on 1 March 2001:(1) Is the Minister's Department, or are agencies within the portfolio, large purchasers or consumers of office papers.(2) How are the Commonwealth procurement guidelines being adhered to by the Minister's Department and agencies within the portfolio.(3) What methodology or weighting criteria does the Minister's Department and agencies use to determine the importance of the core principles which underpin the procurement guidelines, namely (a) value for money, (b) open and effective competition, (c) ethics and fair dealing, (d) accountability and reporting, (e) national competitiveness and industry development and support for other Commonwealth policies.(4) What weighting criteria are used to implement the mandatory provisions in the guidelines which state that agencies must be able to demonstrate that Australia New Zealand (ANZ) suppliers have had a fair opportunity to compete.(5) In inviting suppliers to tender for the provision of goods, are suppliers advised that they must offer ANZ goods.(6) If the Minister's Department or agencies within the portfolio do not have weighting criteria for determining the principles, will the Minister take steps to ensure that they provide an appropriate means to demonstrate their compliance with Commonwealth procurement policy.26769Truss, Warren, MPMr TrussGT4Wide BayNPMinister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry10—The answer to the honourable member's question is as follows:(1) Yes.(2) AFFA's Chief Executive Instruction on “Procurement of Goods and Services” includes advice that the “Commonwealth Procurement Guidelines are to be observed when purchasing goods and services”.(3) AFFA bases its purchasing on the Commonwealth Procurement Guidelines. There is no methodology or weighting criteria for the importance of the core principles, however, a weighting may be applied to some evaluation criteria.(4) While taking into account the issue of providing opportunities for Australian and New Zealand industry, AFFA also takes into account other principles such as value for money, ensuring an efficient, effective and ethical use of funds.(5) As above.(7) Checks of compliance with government policy are undertaken through several avenues. For example, through internal audit reviews, ANAO reviews, gazettal of contracts over $2000 and the Annual Report. In addition, the services of probity auditors are utilised, where necessary, to ensure compliance with government policy.26770(Question No. 2399)239926770Sidebottom, Sid, MPMr Sidebottom849BraddonALP00 asked the Minister representing the Minister for Family and Community Services, upon notice, on 1 March 2001:(1) Is the Minister's Department, or are agencies within the portfolio, large purchasers or consumers of office papers.(2) How are Commonwealth procurement guidelines being adhered to by the Minister's Department and agencies within the portfolio.(3) What methodology or weighting criteria does the Minister's Department and agencies use to determine the importance of the core principles which underpin the procurement guidelines, namely (a) value for money, (b) open and effective competition, (c) ethics and fair dealing, (d) accountability and reporting, (e) national competitiveness and industry development and (f) support for other Commonwealth policies.(4) What weighting criteria are used to implement the mandatory provisions in the guidelines which state that agencies must be able to demonstrate that Australia New Zealand (ANZ) suppliers have had a fair opportunity to compete.(5) In inviting suppliers to tender for the provision of goods, are suppliers advised that they must offer ANZ goods.(6) If the Minister's Department or agencies within the portfolio do not have weighting criteria for determining the principles, will the Minister take steps to ensure that they provide an appropriate means to demonstrate their compliance with Commonwealth procurement policy.26770Anthony, Larry, MPMr AnthonyXJ6RichmondNPMinister for Community Services10—The Minister for Family and Community Services has provided the following answer to the honourable member's question:(1) Yes.(2) Commonwealth procurement guidelines are the basis for a range of internal policy documents relating to procurement in the Family and Community Services portfolio (which includes the Department, Centrelink, Child Support Agency, CRS Australia, Social Security Appeals Tribunal, and the Australian Institute of Family Studies). The documents include the Chief Executive Instructions, procurement manuals and tender and contract templates, Centrelink publications such as “Buying Matters” and “Buying Matters More” and CRS Australia's Purchasing and Contracts Policies and Procedures manual and standard offer documentation. The Child Support Agency purchases a wide range of services including office papers from the ATO, which follows the Commonwealth Procurement Guidelines. In addition to these documents, FaCS agencies have specialist staff who provide advice on all major purchasing activities.(3) The Commonwealth procurement guidelines, which lay down the core procurement principles, make no distinction between the principles in terms of priority. All internal documents and procurement processes within the portfolio give equal weight to each principle. No principle is considered superior to any other.(4) The requirement that agencies must be able to demonstrate that Australian and New Zealand (ANZ) suppliers have had a fair opportunity to compete is implemented by Family and Community Services portfolio in three ways. First, by a requirement that ANZ suppliers are not to be discriminated against by the use of inappropriate specification of requirements. Second, by a requirement to give fullest consideration to ANZ goods and services representing value for money. Third, by the use of the Industrial Supplies Office as a source of information on potential ANZ suppliers. This is reflected in portfolio internal documents in accordance with the Commonwealth procurement guidelines.(5) Potential suppliers are generally provided with information about Commonwealth policy on the offering of ANZ goods, as detailed in Commonwealth procurement guidelines. Mandating the supply of ANZ goods would be in contravention of the core principles laid down in the Commonwealth procurement guidelines.(6) Application of all internal instructions, manuals, tender and contract templates and other relevant documents and procurement processes within the portfolio is subject to on-going monitoring by specialist staff, and public scrutiny through the publication of details of contracts arranged. 26771(Question No. 2405)240526771Bevis, Arch, MPMr BevisET4BrisbaneALP00 asked the Minister for Defence, upon notice, on 1 March 2001:(1) What performance indicators and quality control procedures have been introduced in relation to the work done by trade repair organisations which was formerly performed at South Queensland Logistic Group.(2) What comparisons have been made of the quality and cost-effectiveness of this trade work with previous in-house work.(3) What conclusions or findings have been reached as a result of these comparisons.26771Reith, Peter, MPMr ReithWI4FlindersLPMinister for Defence10—The answer to the honourable member's question is as follows:(1) Northern Logistic Group has both a performance evaluation system and a quality system. All repair and maintenance activity is subject to monthly performance review against a range of performance indicators. The unit employs a contemporary quality assurance approach to ensuring the quality of work performed externally. This approach includes random and programmed audits throughout the entire repair and maintenance process. The work was not necessarily formerly performed in-house as Northern Logistic Group has always utilised a combination of both internal and external repair.(2) There is continuous evaluation of the cost effectiveness and quality of all repair and maintenance work for which Northern Logistic Group is responsible. In addition to cost, factors such as workshop capacity and capability, turnaround time and ability to source and supply repair parts impact on the decision to conduct repairs either internally or externally.(3) The conclusion reached from evaluation of workshop capacity and capability is that local industry has far greater resources that can be applied to repair and maintenance tasks managed by Northern Logistic Group. To best satisfy the requirements of the regional dependency, a combination of external and internal capabilities will continue to be utilised. Both internal and external processes have proven capable of delivering to the required quality standard.26771(Question No. 2406)240626771Bevis, Arch, MPMr BevisET4BrisbaneALP00 asked the Minister for Defence, upon notice, on 1 March 2001:(1) Since 1 July 2000, has Defence identified or become aware of any cases where the private contractor for vehicle maintenance for work from the South Queensland Logistic Group has forwarded a bill for work that has not been done.(2) If so, on how many occasions did this occur and who was the contractor on each occasion.(3) What action was taken to rectify the vehicle and when.(4) Who paid for the rectification.(5) What penalties were imposed on the contractor and when.(6) Does Defence still use that contractor.(7) What inspections or processes were in place to identify these errors.(8) Have any changes been made to these inspection procedures since June 2000: if so, (a) what changes have been made, (b) by whose authority were they made (c) when were they made.26771Reith, Peter, MPMr ReithWI4FlindersLPMinister for Defence10—The answer to the honourable member's question is as follows:(1) Since 1 July 2000 Northern Logistic Group, formerly known as South Queensland Logistic Group has completed 1024 Work Orders for vehicular repair through the use of private contractors. One invoice for vehicle maintenance work was received where a lubrication task was included on the invoice but had only partly been completed.(2) This has occurred on one occasion only. The contractor was Daimler Chrysler. (3) The contractor was informed and the matter rectified immediately.(4) The rectification was wholly at the contractors expense.(5) No penalties were imposed on the contractor.(6) Daimler Chrysler is the Original Equipment Manufacturers representative, has a national contract for supply of repair parts and continues to be used throughout Defence.(7) Northern Logistic Group employs a contemporary quality assurance approach to ensuring the quality of work performed externally. This approach includes random and programmed audits throughout the entire repair and maintenance process.(8) A programmed system audit of the entire Repair process was conducted in October 2000. There have been no changes to inspection procedures as a result of this audit or any other review since 1 July 2000.26772(Question No. 2407)240726772Bevis, Arch, MPMr BevisET4BrisbaneALP00 asked the Minister for Defence, upon notice, on 1 March 2001:(1) In the answer to question No. 1813 (Hansard, 4 October 2000, page 20853), was it indicated that Defence played no role in determining wages and personnel management matters for contractors' employees at the Bulimba barracks.(2) If so, why then did Army or Defence personnel provide advice to CMAS Consulting on the suitability of former staff when it gained the contract for the supply of labour at Enoggera and SQLG, as outlined in the reply to question No. 2188 (Hansard, 6 February 2001, page 20913).26772Reith, Peter, MPMr ReithWI4FlindersLPMinister for Defence10—The answer to the honourable member's question is as follows:(1) No. The answer stated that `Defence plays no role in negotiations concerning conditions for contractors' employees.'(2) Army or Defence staff of Northern Logistic Group (NLG) did not play a role in negotiations concerning conditions for prospective CMAS Consulting employees. As answered in Parliamentary Question on Notice No. 2188, `Defence staff were requested by CMAS Consulting to provide verbal referee comment on Drake Industrial employees that CMAS Consulting was considering recruiting for employment at Bulimba. Referee comment was sought from military supervisors on two criteria: standard of work, and length of time on site.' No additional information was sought by CMAS Consulting or provided by Army or Defence staff.26772(Question No. 2408)240826772Kerr, Duncan, MPMr KerrRH4DenisonALP00 asked the Prime Minister, upon notice, on 1 March 2001:(1) Further to the answer to question No. 1283 (Hansard, 27 February 2001, page 21301) in which he said information is not available against the categories of dates specified in the answer, what information is available to the Government regarding (a) full time, (b) part time and (c) casual staff employed by the Commonwealth in (i) Tasmania and (ii) the electoral division of Denison and for what dates is it available.(2) Why was the specific information sought by me not available.(3) What is the best information available to the Government regarding the categories of employment for those closest to those sought by me.(4) Why did it take approximately 11 months for him to respond to my question with a reply to the effect that the information would not be provided.26772Howard, John, MPMr HowardZD4BennelongLPPrime Minister10—The answer to the honourable member's question is as follows:I am advised by my department as follows:(1) The honourable member has asked for information in relation to `Commonwealth employment'. In addition to encompassing people employed under the Public Service Act 1999 (the Public Service Act) in the Australian Public Service (the APS), the description `Commonwealth employment' also extends to ongoing and non-ongoing employment in non-APS entities in the form of Government Business Enterprises such as Telstra and Australia Post and to elements which have left the APS but which have continued within the Commonwealth such as Health Services Australia and Australian Hearing Services. Details of all employment by the Commonwealth Government are not held centrally. The Public Service and Merit Protection Commission (PSMPC) collects data on APS employment, but it does not collect data on employment in these non-APS Commonwealth entities, nor does it collect data on casual employment. In relation to APS employment in Tasmania, between 1995/96 and 1998/99 the PSMPC collected data on the number of persons being paid from Tasmanian pay centres. In 1999/2000, the collection method changed to the number of persons physically located in Tasmania. This data is publicly available in the PSMPC's Statistical Bulletin for each of the financial years. The PSMPC does not collect data specifically relating to APS employment in the electoral division of Denison.(2) The specific information sought by the honourable member could only have been obtained by survey of Commonwealth departments and agencies that might employ staff in Tasmania. I was not prepared to authorise the diversion of resources that would have been required to conduct such a survey.(3) In his Question on Notice No.1283, the honourable member asked for information current as at 2 March 1996 and March 2000. APS employment data collected by the PSMPC on the bases described above is available for a range of dates up to June 2000, but 31 March 1996 and 30 June 2000 are the dates closest to the those sought by the honourable member. As at 31 March 1996, the number of on-going APS employees whose pay centre was located in Tasmania was 2,769, which was 2.1 per cent of on-going APS employees at that time. As at 30 June 2000, the number of APS employees physically located in Tasmania was 1721, representing 1.7 percent of on-going APS employees. It is important to note that the difference between the two sets of figures does not necessarily reflect a decline in absolute numbers in Commonwealth employment but rather a change in the statistical methodology. Additionally, and as indicated previously, staff at Health Services Australia and Australian Hearing Services are no longer APS employees although they have remained in Commonwealth employment.(4) Consideration was given and discussions were held on ways to compile the data sought by the honourable member leading to a conclusion that the expense and effort involved could not be justified.26773(Question No. 2410)241026773Kerr, Duncan, MPMr KerrRH4DenisonALP00 asked the Attorney-General, upon notice, on 1 March 2001:What will he do to ensure the ongoing availability of staff and resources to the Administrative Appeals Tribunal or other administrative agencies given Parliament's rejection of his amalgamation proposal.26773Williams, Daryl, MPMr Williams7V5TangneyLPAttorney-General10—The answer to the honourable member's question is as follows:The existing tribunals which would have been replaced by the Administrative Review Tribunal (ART) will continue to operate as usual. The terms of appointments of a number of AAT members will cease on 30 June 2001. I will be taking appropriate steps to ensure that the AAT has adequate membership to ensure its continuing operation. There are a number of members whose tenure continues beyond 30 June 2001 and their situation is not affected.Appropriate staffing levels will be maintained, and other resources allocated, to enable the tribunal to meet existing workloads beyond 1 July 2001. In relation to the other tribunals that were to be incorporated into the ART, the responsible Ministers will take the necessary steps in relation to membership, staff and other resources to ensure their continuity.26774(Question No. 2418)241826774Ferguson, Martin, MPMr Martin FergusonLS4BatmanALP00 asked the Minister for Finance and Administration, upon notice, on 1 March 2001:(1) Given that the scoping study of the sale of Sydney Airport is due for completion shortly, will the ACCC decision on the SACL aeronautical pricing proposal be finally resolved before the sale.(2) When is the Productivity Commission review of the price regulation of airport services due for completion and will it be completed before the sale.(3) When are the airlines' legal actions against SACL due to be heard by the Federal Court.(4) What is the basis of the legal actions and is it the intended that the sale proceed before this legal action is completed.26774Costello, Peter, MPMr CostelloCT4HigginsLPTreasurer10—The Acting Minister for Finance and Administration has supplied the following answer to the honourable member's question:(1) The ACCC has issued a draft decision. A final decision is expected before the sale is concluded.(2) I am advised that the Productivity Commission is due to deliver its final report on its review of price regulation of airport services on 21 December 2001. The sale of Sydney Airport is expected to be concluded in the second half of 2001.(3) I understand that legal action commenced by the airlines against SACL in relation to the SA2000 project will not be heard until November 2001 at the earliest.(4) I am unable to comment on matters currently the subject of court action. The sale of Sydney Airport is expected to be concluded in the second half of 2001.26774(Question No. 2419)241926774Ferguson, Martin, MPMr Martin FergusonLS4BatmanALP00 asked the Minister for Financial Services and Regulation, upon notice, on 1 March 2001:(1) With respect to the draft decision of the ACCC relating to the Sydney Airport Corporation Limited aeronautical pricing proposal released on 16 February 2001 and requiring responses by 5 March 2001, did he or his Department receive complaints about this deadline and the short amount of time available to prepare responses; if so, from whom.(2) Who made the decision to impose this deadline and why.(3) Did he consider an extension of time; if so, why was it rejected.26774Hockey, Joe, MPMr HockeyDK6North SydneyLPMinister for Financial Services and Regulation10—The answer to the honourable member's question is as follows:(1) No.(2) The decision to require responses by 5 March 2001 was made by the ACCC as part of its assessment process. The public consultation process extended over a five month period and followed a consultation process between Sydney Airport and airport users of almost a year. In setting the deadline for responses the ACCC advises me that it weighed up the potential benefits from extending the process against the need for a timely response to SACL's proposals.(3) See answer to (2).26774(Question No. 2420)242026774Ferguson, Martin, MPMr Martin FergusonLS4BatmanALP00 asked the Minister for Financial Services and Regulation, upon notice, on 1 March 2001:(1) With respect to the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission's (ACCC) decision on the aeronautical pricing proposal by the Sydney Airport Corporation Limited (SACL), what information has the ACCC refused to release to enable the Board of Airline Representatives (BARA) to comment and what was the justification for the ACCC's refusal to release such information.(2) What was the nature of the information provided by SACL to the ACCC after the closing date for submissions and was access to that information denied to BARA which would have allowed it to comment on that SACL material; if not, why not. (3) Was BARA given access to the ACCC's modelling of costs and charges, and was BARA allowed to comment on such modelling; if not, why not.(4) Was the ACCC's modelling of costs and charges provided to SACL; if so, why was SACL provided such material and BARA not provided with the material.26775Hockey, Joe, MPMr HockeyDK6North SydneyLPMinister for Financial Services and Regulation10—The answer to the honourable member's question is as follows:(1) The ACCC did not release two items to BARA. The first was a report commissioned by Sydney Airport on operating and maintenance costs. The report was prepared by Leigh Fisher Associates. The second was material provided by Sydney Airport to Opus international, consultants to the ACCC.The Leigh Fisher report was not released to BARA because it contained commercial in confidence information. In relation to the material provided by Sydney Airport to Opus international the ACCC considered that to obtain and then release the information would unnecessarily delay the assessment process and the information sought was not material to the final outcome of the ACCC's considerations.(2) SACL provided updated traffic forecasts to the ACCC after the closing date for submissions. This followed a request from the ACCC.The updated traffic forecasts have been made available to BARA. BARA was invited to provide comments on the information provided.(3) BARA was given access to the ACCC's modelling of costs and charges and was invited to comment on it.(4) Both SACL and BARA were given access to the ACCC's modelling of costs and charges.26775(Question No. 2421)242126775Ferguson, Martin, MPMr Martin FergusonLS4BatmanALP00 asked the Attorney-General, upon notice, on 1 March 2001:(1) Given recent media reports alleging that a group of Sydney lawyers are using bankruptcy to escape their tax debts, has the Treasurer, the Minister for Finance and Administration, their offices or Departments consulted him, his office or his Department about action that can be taken to stop such a group of wealthy individuals abusing the tax system by being serial bankrupts.(2) Does he support proposed changes by the NSW Attorney-General to change State regulations under which barristers who abused the tax system would be disbarred.(3) Will he consider lobbying other State and Territory governments to introduce regulations similar to that proposed in NSW; if not, why not given the Tax Commissioner's attacks in speeches during 1999 and in his 1999 and 2000 annual reports on professionals abusing the tax system.(4) Has he, his office or his Department been consulted by any other Minister, Minister's staff or Department concerning how the Government might pursue other professional groups referred to by the Tax Commissioner such as accounting and medical professionals as having five times the average national tax debt due to their policy of abusing the tax system.26775Williams, Daryl, MPMr Williams7V5TangneyLPAttorney-General10—The answer to the honourable member's question is as follows:(1) I met in March with my colleague the Assistant Treasurer, Senator the Hon Rod Kemp, to discuss a coordinated response to this problem. As a result of that meeting a Task Force of officers was established to examine and report upon the legislative and administrative changes that might be required to deal adequately with the problem. That Task Force includes representatives from my Department, the Insolvency and Trustee Service Australia, the Australian Taxation Office and the Treasury. It will consult both the Australian Federal Police and the Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) in the course of its deliberations, and with the legal profession.(2) This is not a precise statement of the changes introduced by the NSW Attorney-General. The NSW Attorney-General has introduced changes to the regulations under the Legal Profession Act 1987 (NSW) to ensure that barristers and solicitors are required to disclose to their professional association any bankruptcy or arrangement with their creditors, as well as details of any criminal convictions (apart from some minor specified exceptions). I support the thrust of the changes that have been introduced by the NSW Attorney-General. (3) I placed the matter on the agenda for meeting of the Standing Committee of Attorneys-General in Adelaide on 22-23 March 2001. At that meeting I urged upon my State and Territory colleagues the desirability of adopting a consistent approach to the problem, and that the following elements should be the minimum elements of that response:· The mandatory reporting by a legal practitioner to the relevant professional association of his or her bankruptcy; and· A mechanism whereby the relevant professional association applies a `fit and proper person' test to the right of a person, once bankrupt, to practise, or to continue to practise, as a barrister.At the meeting I proposed that a working group of Commonwealth, State and Territory officials be appointed to develop a response to the problem. This proposal was accepted by my State and Territory colleagues.(4) I am not aware of any such approaches.26776(Question No. 2422)242226776Ferguson, Martin, MPMr Martin FergusonLS4BatmanALP00 asked the Minister for Transport and Regional Services, upon notice, on 5 March 2001:(1) How many Vehicle Import Approvals (VIAs) under Regulation 9E of the Motor Vehicle Standards Regulations and paragraph 20(1)(b) of the Motor Vehicle Standards Act have been issued in each of the last five years.(2) How many vehicles were approved under the VIAs, by model and make.(3) How many VIAs in each year were issued to (a) licenced dealers and (b) individuals.(4) What sum does the administration of the VIA approval process cost his Department each year.(5) What procedure is followed and criteria applied when considering a request for a VIA.(6) What steps does his Department take to ensure compliance with the terms of a VIA and what resources have been spent on this process in each of the past five years.26776Anderson, John, MPMr Anderson4K4GwydirNPMinister for Transport and Regional Services10—The answer to the honourable member's question is as follows:(1) VIAs issued under Motor Vehicle Standards Regulation 9E and paragraph 20(1)(b): 1996122519972626199836441999573320006890(2) Number of vehicles approved under VIAs issued under Motor Vehicle Standards Regulation 9E and paragraph 20(1)(b): 199649111997625719988019199914517200016289Details of the different makes and models imported over the last five years are provided in the Attachment.(3) The information requested is not provided to the Department.(4) Cost estimate for administration of the VIA process for the current financial year is $540 000.(5) The assessment procedures employed for each VIA application are as follows:Confirmation the application fee has been paid.Confirmation that the vehicles for which the import application is made are eligible under Motor Vehicle Standards Regulation 9E. Confirmation that the applicant is the owner of the vehicle for which application is made by way of an invoice.Confirmation that the vehicle is of the type described in the application.Confirmation that the applicant holds a Compliance Plate Approval for the subject vehicle make/model, or the application is accompanied by a Letter of Agreement from a holder of a Compliance Plate Approval for the subject vehicle make/model.(6) Details of all vehicles are forwarded electronically to the National Exchange of Vehicle and Driver Identification System (NEVDIS) every two days for the information of State and Territory Registering Authorities (STRAs). Irregulaties are generally detected in the first instance by the STRAs and this may lead to an investigation and possibly prosecution. Resources required for this function have not been costed. MAKEMODEL19961997199819992000ACACE00100Alfa Romeo15500032Alfa Romeo164017242214Alfa RomeoSpyder31213AlferVR250000015AMGHummer00011ApriliaMoto 6.500010Aston MartinDB740810Aston MartinV Series00010Aston MArtinVantage00022ATK25006000ATK60410000ATK605358000AudiQuatro Coupe10000AutozamAZ104000BentleyContinental R00001BimotaSB6100000BluebirdCSRE3904C00001BluebirdNissan00100BluebirdU1300100Boss Hoss CyclesBoss Hoss00001BuellRS120000010BuellS1 Lightning01000BuellThunderbolt2112000CadillacBrougham31011CadillacDeville22010CadillacEldorado14000CadillacFleetwood79213CadillacFWD00011CadillacLimousine33211CadillacRWD00080CadillacSeville22200CadillacStretch10000CaterhamSuper 710000CCM60400010ChevroletACC Pickup00100ChevroletBlazer01000ChevroletC 150044605775ChevroletC 2500146520ChevroletC 3011003ChevroletC 35001322827ChevroletC/CAB00006ChevroletC/K Series1223125116ChevroletC/K Truck10000ChevroletC2010000ChevroletCamaro6542424839ChevroletCC20901000ChevroletChevy Van14100ChevroletCorvette14311093106108ChevroletCrew Cab12000ChevroletEl Camino00010ChevroletEldorado10000ChevroletExtended Cab Pick Up01000ChevroletExtra Cab11000ChevroletG3500 VAN00001ChevroletGC110000ChevroletK1500351502ChevroletK250034401ChevroletK3010000ChevroletK350040010ChevroletPick Up4763528337ChevroletSilverado15210ChevroletSport Van10000ChevroletSuburban14502ChevroletSurburban00010ChevroletT Series Van00012ChevroletVandura00010ChevroletX-Cab 150000100ChryslerLe Baron31410Citroen2CV685040DaihatsuCharade50000DaihatsuG100S Charade Turbo01000DennisJavelin00105Di BlasiR700009DiahatsuMidget00002DodgeRam01234936DodgeViper22002EnfieldBullet24323EnfieldLightning00010EunosCosmo00003EvansAutoload Semi Trailer02000Ferrari348 TS/TB00001FerrariF35582000FordBronco33200FordCF8000 Street Sweeper02000FordClub Wagon11030FordF Series00105360FordF1505129101FordF25036401120FordF35019222154FordF45000100FordF55010000FordL700030000FordL7000 Street Sweeper10000FordLincoln02411FordLN 700009000FordLN 7000 Street Sweeper01000FordMustang2126355364FordP13100004FordPick Up11000FordPN Series NA000215FordSF Van Diesel00002FordSierra33010FordSpectron1153942FordSSF0081715FordSuper Duty Stripped Chassis000022FordThunderbird00100FordTransit20000FordTruck000615FordVan Diesel00040FraserClubman11000GMC150023400GMC250001100GMC3500111210GMC4x4 Pick up10000GMCATC C/K Series00006GMCC 150087201GMCC 155010000GMCC 250010200GMCC 3000110GMCC 35007101800GMCC/Cab00001GMCC/K Series00162915GMCJimmy01000GMCK 150011000GMCPick Up1017442112GMCSierra11301GMCSilverado01000GMCStation Wagon00100GMCSuburban24100Harley DavidsonFLST10000Harley DavidsonFLSTF10000Harley DavidsonFXR11000Harley DavidsonXLH883 Sportster X Ser00001Honda250 SPADA00900HondaBeat297116HondaBR 25010000HondaCB 250 FN02000HondaCB400016000HondaCBR10000HondaCBR 150R01000HondaCBR 2502021149386HondaCBR 250 R14093152032HondaCBR 250 RK22000HondaCBR 250 RR179137393226HondaCBR 250 RRN03000HondaCBR 250RRL10000HondaCBR 40030242HondaCBR 400 RN01000HondaCBR 400 RR01000HondaCBR 400R10000HondaCBR 400RR4011201HondaCBR 400RRK10000HondaCBR 400RRL20000HondaCBR150RR10000HondaCBR250401000HondaCBR250R-2000160HondaCBR250RJ01000HondaCity441531713HondaCRM2500215164HondaCRM250R00001HondaCRV00155HondaCRX3229320HondaFZR 40000010HondaGL150000100HondaGoldwing081280HondaGryo Up00010HondaGyro 50001100HondaGyro Up000220HondaMC19 CBR2500001312HondaMC22000810HondaMetro Beat10010HondaNSR00320HondaNSR 2501933230HondaNSR 250 R6317014HondaNSR250SE20201HondaRVF40026100HondaVFR01000HondaVFR 4003932444HondaVFR 400 R3322800HondaVFR 400 RN43000HondaVFR 400404000HondaVFR 400RK10000HondaVT2500121447HondaXLR25002000HondaZXR 25000011HummerHMC4010100HummerHMCO01000HummerHMCS00300HummerPass HT00001HummerVLC201000HummerXLC203400HusabergEndoro01000HusabergEnduro3488000Isuzu4x4 Sports01471IsuzuGemeni01000IsuzuMC Diesel Wagon00001IsuzuMU1177127222298IsuzuNPR106001IsuzuUBS5520000IsuzuUCS1701000IsuzuUCS5520000Jawa350cc20000JeepWrangler60000KawasakiFXR 25001000KawasakiGPX 25093722100KawasakiGPX250II40000KawasakiGPX250R41300KawasakiGPX250R220000KawasakiGPX250RI90000KawasakiGPX250RII110000KawasakiKR-110000KawasakiXZR25001000KawasakiZX250C00001KawasakiZX250R00001KawasakiZXD25010000KawasakiZXR 205R01000KawasakiZXR 25016110110111KawasakiZXR 40053000KawasakiZXR250A32410KawasakiZXR250C112121KawasakiZXR250R01007KawasakiZZR2502324762KawasakiZZR40040000Kinetic PrideFX5000001LamborghiniCountach01000LamborghiniDiablo10260LexusLS 30010000LexusLS 40010000LincolnLimousine01000LincolnMark V11121000LincolnTown Car43074LotusEclat20000LotusElise00501LotusEsprit10020LotusExcel00010MANM1000 Series00010MANM1013 Tractor10000MaseratiBiTurbo Coupe01000Mazda323131111Mazda62620110Mazda92946363093MazdaBongo2429561630MazdaCabriolet13001MazdaCapella1591021102728MazdaCronos00501MazdaDiesel00020MazdaEunos01000MazdaEunos Cosmo000015MazdaFamilia12253MazdaFamilia 32300100MazdaFamilia BG8Z0012855MazdaFamilia Cabriolet00100MazdaGE Diesel00374MazdaGEFP00001MazdaRMP Diesel00110MazdaSeries Diesel00100MazdaSSF00196363MazdaVan Diesel00010MGRV80003123MitsubishiChallenger Diesel00001MitsubishiDelicia000144330MitsubishiFTO140122250333MitsubishiGalant31000MitsubishiMirage01000MitsubishiOmnibus00100MitsubishiPajero000086MitsubishiRVR 20000059MorganPLUS 803010NavistarF9300 Nouiston02000Nissan U1200020Nissan1200 Sunny00415Nissan180SX4590113373Nissan198900100Nissan300ZX79162357523698Nissan4x4 Station Wagon07000NissanA310022213NissanAtlas00253160NissanBluebird20131512NissanC220243812095NissanC330011510NissanCefiro9271133NissanCM Diesel00001NissanCondor 2000011NissanD210066491624NissanDelicia00051NissanDiesel 4WD00010NissanDual Cab Turbo Diesel00100NissanDY2100010NissanE24 4WD000133NissanF.T.O00010NissanFairlady1014171NissanGTI R03000NissanGTR01110NissanGTST-400101NissanHomey00001NissanHomy01516111NissanImperial10000NissanJZA80 Supra00010NissanLargo163911NissanLaurel714801NissanMaxima342110NissanMU00021NissanPathfinder12141117147171NissanPeralux U1300010NissanPulsar1214151323NissanS Cargo3164449381NissanS131014846627452355NissanSER Diesel00200NissanSerena C23000022NissanSilvia1764204801631NissanSkyline1561183369011628NissanSoarer00002NissanStanza20000NissanSunny09100NissanSVS C3300020NissanSylvia114000NissanTerrano13378468416362NissanTurbo P/Car00012NissanTwin Turbo01000NissanU12001101NissanU1300105936NissanVRM00040NissanVRMG Series 4WD008269NissanW3000006NissanY10 Utility00020NissanZ32003169NortonF100001NortonF1 Rotary20000OKA Motor Co LtdMulti Cab & Tray00100OKA Motor Co LtdTour Bus00200OKA Motor Co. LtdDual Cab & Tray00100OshkoshM97730000OshkoshMSerier10000Perterbilt37901000Peterbilt32002000Peterbilt35910001Peterbilt36269000Peterbilt37700011Peterbilt37914034Peugeot50403000PiaggioTEC1T00005PontiacFiero6181294PontiacFirebird1011976PontiacTrans Am36192299Porsche91100100Porsche930914471PRBClubman00095RenaultSpider00110RoverMini1223372024Royal EnfieldBullet010037SelectOmibus00030SelectOmnibus000115StandardForce 50000029StandardForce 90000029Suzuki250 Across4015221SuzukiCappucino1250222615SuzukiCultus27403SuzukiCutlus02000SuzukiGSF 250 Bandit04000SuzukiGSX 250 Katana01000SuzukiGSX 250SSM10000SuzukiGSX25023000SuzukiGSX250F20000SuzukiGSX250S00100SuzukiGSXR 750165000SuzukiGSXR40003000SuzukiRGV2504923621SuzukiRGV250R00100Tatra815 6X6 Series00001TitanGecko00033Toyota4 Runner15675512098ToyotaCamry00519ToyotaCapella00001ToyotaCarina1321153712ToyotaCarona07000ToyotaCavalier00003ToyotaCE 1000445134144ToyotaCelica000452ToyotaChaser01211114ToyotaCM50000015ToyotaCorolla961681201329ToyotaCorona757780656643522ToyotaCorsa3214733ToyotaCR Series00013170ToyotaCressida201700ToyotaCresta05203ToyotaCRM50 SRS DSL00002ToyotaCT190 Ser Dsl000910ToyotaCV30 Diesel0011715ToyotaCXR Series00031302ToyotaD21 Diesel00009ToyotaDeliboy00101ToyotaDelicia00001ToyotaDerosa00002ToyotaDiesel LX90 Series02995165ToyotaDiesel Mark 1100101ToyotaDyna 200 4WD00244ToyotaEL 40 Series000015ToyotaEL30 Series00310ToyotaEL3120000ToyotaEP 80 Series00010ToyotaEP800043329ToyotaEstima0004068ToyotaGD Series Diesel00200ToyotaHarrier000141ToyotaHiAce00500ToyotaHilux13661463853ToyotaJZA800022016ToyotaKAL Dyna 200 4WD00010ToyotaLandcruiser000311ToyotaLargo00001ToyotaLiteace004512565ToyotaLX80112375113ToyotaMR 24161519461ToyotaPardo00001ToyotaPrado005107145ToyotaSera17363273105ToyotaSoarer1212965309301322ToyotaSprinter01000ToyotaST 170108288ToyotaST 1800082311ToyotaST 18200010ToyotaST 18300024ToyotaST 1900045345ToyotaST 200 Srs00002ToyotaStarlet4821394861ToyotaSupra1789212260338ToyotaSurf11671159934863483ToyotaTarago003311881ToyotaTercel3677212062ToyotaTown Ace00618349TVRSports Car016130YamahaFR 25001000YamahaFXR 25000011YamahaFZR 25045021711229YamahaFZR 250 R188622000YamahaFZR 400 R53100YamahaFZR 400 RR186100YamahaFZR250-203200YamahaFZR250R-100100YamahaFZR400113100YamahaNSR 25001000YamahaRZR 250R10000YamahaTZR25067140YamahaTZR250A00010YamahaTZR250R00110YamahaV Max03110YamahaXJR40002000YamahaYZR250R00100YamahaZFR 2501000026788(Question No. 2423)242326788Ferguson, Martin, MPMr Martin FergusonLS4BatmanALP00 asked the Minister for Financial Services and Regulation, upon notice, on 5 March 2001:(1) Further to the answer to question No. 2117 (Hansard, 26 February 2001, page 21217) concerning the remuneration package of the Chairman of the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC), due to the sensitive nature of the ACCC Chairman's duties, is he required to notify him, his office or his Department in the same way as Members and Senators are required, of any gifts received from official and other than official services and of any sponsored travel or hospitality received including attendance at sporting and cultural events; if not, why not.(2) Did the Chairman attend the 2000 Olympics as a guest; if so, which events were attended and what was the nature of the hospitality received by the Chairman.26788Hockey, Joe, MPMr HockeyDK6North SydneyLPMinister for Financial Services and Regulation10—The answer to the honourable member's question is as follows:(1) No. The Chairman of the ACCC has not been required to notify the Minister, his office or his Department of any gifts or sponsored travel or hospitality received. The Chairman is subject to section 13 of the Public Service Act 1999 (APS Code of Conduct), and the ACCC's Guidelines for Members and Associates, which require that personal benefits accepted be declared for the internal records concerning such matters.(2) No. I am informed that the Chairman did not attend the 2000 Olympics as a guest.26788(Question No. 2426)242626788Murphy, John, MPMr Murphy83DLoweALP00 asked the Minister representing the Minister for the Environment and Heritage, upon notice, on 5 March 2001:(1) Can the Minister define what documents constitute the proposal known as Sydney West Airport.(2) Can the Minister describe the proposal for Sydney West Airport as it presently stands.(3) Can the Minister describe the impact of the supplementary EIS for Sydney West Airport, made in 1999 on the proposal.(4) In light of the decisions relating to Bankstown and Sydney (Kingsford Smith) Airports on 13 December 2000, has the Minister been advised that the proposal has been withdrawn.26788Truss, Warren, MPMr TrussGT4Wide BayNPMinister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry10—The Minister for the Environment and Heritage has provided the following answer to the honourable member's question:(1) By Sydney West Airport , I presume that you mean the proposal to construct and operate a second major airport for Sydney at Badgerys Creek which I will now refer to as the Second Sydney Airport Proposal.The Second Sydney Airport proposal was assessed by my Department in accordance with the Administrative Procedures of the Environment Protection (Impact of Proposals) Act 1974. A Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) was released for public review in December 1997. A Supplement to the Draft EIS, which took account of the public comments received in regard to the Draft EIS, was submitted to my Department in June 1999. My Department completed its assessment of these documents and submitted its advice to me in August 1999. I subsequently conveyed my advice and recommendations in regard to the proposal to the Minister for Transport and Regional Services.(2) The proposal that I considered was that described in the EIS for the Second Sydney Airport Proposal.(3) The impacts of the Second Sydney Airport Proposal are described in the EIS documents and in my Department's assessment report. These documents, as well as my advice and recommendations to the Minister for Transport and Regional Services, are on the public record.(4) The Government's position on the Second Sydney Airport Proposal was made clear in its announcement of 13 December 2000 on Sydney's future airport needs.26789(Question No. 2431)243126789Fitzgibbon, Joel, MPMr Fitzgibbon8K6HunterALP00 asked the Minister for Sport and Tourism, upon notice, on 6 March 2001:(1) Of the 425 900 overseas visitors in Australia during January 2001, what percentage claimed back the GST incurred on purchases.(2) Has she received any complaints from international tourists on the logistical problems involved with claiming back GST on goods purchased in Australia; if so, how many.(3) What, if any, advice is given by her to tourists making these complaints.(4) Was she consulted in the Government's process of drawing up the guidelines on the GST-rebate for overseas visitors to Australia; if so, what input did she or her Department provide.(5) Has her attention been drawn to the arrangements the Canadian Government has in place for overseas visitors to have their GST reimbursed.(6) What public educational measures has she and her Department undertaken to ensure overseas visitors to Australia are aware of the Government's GST reimbursement process.(7) Do the current arrangements for GST reimbursement for overseas visitors to Australia make it virtually impossible to obtain a refund and constitute a very unfriendly and unhelpful way to treat visitors.(8) Are the current arrangements a deterrent to overseas visitors and a way to ensure as little of the Government's revenue is returned as possible.26789Kelly, Jackie, MPMiss Jackie KellyGK6LindsayLPMinister for Sport and Tourism10—The answer to the honourable member's question is as follows:(1) The information requested by the honourable member concerns the Tourist Refund Scheme which is administered by the Australian Customs Service. The Department of Industry, Science and Resources does not gather information on the percentage of GST claimed back on purchases. (2) Yes. One.(3) The complaint has been referred to the Australian Customs Service which administers the Tourist Refund Scheme and to the Treasurer who oversights the policy aspects of the Scheme.(4) Yes. The input was in the nature of confidential policy advice to the Minister.(5) Yes.(6) The Australian Customs Service has prime responsibility for promoting the Tourist Refund Scheme on behalf of the Government. The Australian Tourist Commission plays a supporting role in the delivery of the communications strategy by helping in the distribution of pamphlets and other literature through its international offices. (7) No.(8) No.26790(Question No. 2432)243226790Ferguson, Martin, MPMr Martin FergusonLS4BatmanALP00 asked the Minister for Transport and Regional Services, upon notice, on 6 March 2001:(1) Further to the answer to question No. 2154 (Hansard, 26 February 2001, page 24464) concerning Ansett's low-noise approach technique involving aircraft on descent into Sydney using minimum power, should the evaluation of the STAR approach go ahead after the completion of the trial of the Precision Runway Monitor System; if not, why not.(2) Will that evaluation test consideration of whether the proposal helps minimise greenhouse emissions.(3) Has he encouraged Airservices Australia to continue to work on its procedure to trial power off STAR approaches for northerly arrivals at Sydney Airport.26790Anderson, John, MPMr Anderson4K4GwydirNPMinister for Transport and Regional Services10—The answer to the honourable member's question is as follows:(1) Yes.(2) The details of the evaluation have yet to be determined.(3) Yes. Power-off approaches are one of the last remaining elements of the Airport's Long Term Operating Plan (LTOP) that have yet to be implemented. The Government is committed to power-off approaches being trialed at Sydney Airport.26790(Question No. 2433)243326790Roxon, Nicola, MPMs Roxon83KGellibrandALP00 asked the Minister representing the Minister for Industry, Science and Resources, upon notice, on 6 March 2001:(1) What action has been taken by the Government to assess whether the Bradmill Undare Group's application for assistance under the $700 million Textile Clothing and Footwear Strategic Investment Program Scheme (SIPS) would meet the guidelines for this scheme.(2) Following the ordinary procedure, when would an assessment be made.(3) If the application does meet the guidelines, has a decision been made by the Government as to the quantum of any future grant to Bradmill; if not, when would it ordinarily be made.(4) How quickly can the Government indicate in writing to Bradmill, for the purposes of providing to the administrators, bank or potential purchasers, the amount to be paid and the time it will be paid.(5) Has the Government refused two requests by Bradmill for assistance prior to the appointment of administrators for (a) advance payment of SIPS and (b) a quicker decision on how much could be paid and when.(6) Had an assessment been made prior to Wednesday, 28 February 2001 by the Government about whether earlier payment of SIPS money would or could have prevented the appointment of administrators.(7) Does AusIndustry advise on the Department of Industry, Science and Resources website that early advice on entitlement to a grant or an advance ruling on entitlement cannot be made and that no provision for advance payments can be made; if so, what prevents the Government from providing the advice.(8) Is the Textile Clothing and Footwear Strategic Investment Scheme 1999 formulated by the Minister; if so, is it in his power to alter the Scheme.(9) Now that administrators have been appointed, what discussions has the Government had with the administrators to ascertain whether confirmation of quantum and timing of any future payment, or an earlier payment, would assist in keeping the business running as an ongoing concern or securing a buyer for the plant. (10) Is the Government prepared in these circumstances and in order to save jobs, to bring SIPS payments to the Bradmill Undare Group forward.(11) Given the unemployment rate in the City of Maribyrnong, where the Yarraville plant is based, was 12.4% in September 2000 and the devastating impact the closure would have on employment in the region, will the Government consider a discretionary payment under the Regional Assistance Program similar to how that Program has been used for other national projects.(12) Does the Department of Employment, Workplace Relations and Small Business Fact Sheet on the Regional Assistance Program (RAP) refer to the program being used for responding to structural adjustments and economic or business downturns; if so, will the Government treat Bradmill as coming within the guidelines.(13) If Bradmill is forced to close, what arrangements will the Government make for re-training, counselling and job placement services for the Bradmill workers.(14) Does the Fact Sheet on RAP state that funding is available for assistance in training and job seeking for workers facing retrenchment where such retrenchments could have substantial impact on the regional labour market; if so, will the Government treat Bradmill as coming within these guidelines.26791Reith, Peter, MPMr ReithWI4FlindersLPMinister for Defence10—The Minister for Industry, Science and Resources has provided the following answer to the honourable member's question:(1) To be registered, the requirements set out in the legislated TCF (SIP) Scheme need to be met. These requirements were assessed in the normal course of events and four separate entities in the Bradmill Undare Group (Bradmill Textiles Pty Ltd, Undare (Aust) Pty Ltd, Ararat Weaving Pty Ltd and Yarraville Textiles Pty Ltd) have been duly registered.Assessment of actual grant amounts, however, is the last process undertaken and follows lodgement and assessment of a claim.(2) Assessment of grant eligibility does not occur until the claim assessment stage. The earliest the Bradmill Group entities could submit a claim for the first program year (2000/01) and the pre-program years (1998/99 & 1999/00) is 1 July 2001.(3) No decision can be made on Bradmill's grant entitlement until their claim is lodged and assessed and they request a determination of their entitlement to be paid a grant in respect of their claim.(4) The amount to be paid will not be known until the company seeks a determination of grant entitlement following claim assessment. It will up to the company to seek a determination following a claim assessment. The Scheme requires payment to be made as soon as practicable after a request is made.(5) Bradmill first approached the Government seeking early payment of its TCF (SIP) Scheme grants in February 2000 to help meet cash-flow difficulties. At a subsequent meeting with the Government in April 2000 the issue was again raised by representatives of Bradmill. On both occasions the company was advised that the TCF (SIP) scheme legislation provided for payment in arrears and therefore the Government was not able to meet Bradmill's request.Bradmill contacted the Government on Friday 23 February 2001 before receivers were appointed advising that assistance was required by noon the following Monday 26 February 2001. It was not possible for assistance from TCF (SIP) to be provided within that timeframe.(6) Yes. The Government understands that the potential TCF (SIP) claim from the Bradmill Group is relatively small in relation to the debt due to the creditor which was responsible for the appointment of the Receiver. There has been no suggestion that earlier payment of TCF (SIP) grants would have prevented the appointment of the Receiver.(7) Yes. In line with the self assessment nature of the Scheme, it is the Department's policy that no pre-claim rulings on grant entitlement will be given in relation to any entity. However, to assist in the self assessment process, guidance is available from AusIndustry. Nevertheless, it is up to entities to obtain their own advice if they consider there is doubt about the eligibility of activities or expenditures on which they intend to base their claims. (8) Yes. The Textile, Clothing and Footwear Strategic Investment Program Scheme 1999 (TCF (SIP) Scheme) is formulated by the Minister pursuant to section 8 of the Textile, Clothing and Footwear Strategic Investment Program Act 1999. Section 34 of the Act provides that the TCF (SIP) Scheme may be varied, but not revoked, in accordance with subsection 33(3) of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901.(9) The Government is sympathetic to the difficulties of the company and to providing what assistance it can. The Department of Industry Science and Resources is in contact with the receivers. The focus of these discussions has been on the possibility of providing early access to the SIP scheme.The Department's advice is that any early access will make no difference to the decisions of the receivers as to the future of the Bradmill Undare Group. The Receivers have put the Group up for sale either as a whole or as separate parts.(10) The Government has already indicated that it is sympathetic to the situation and will act constructively to assist in this situation. Amendments to the SIP Scheme are being considered with the objective of assisting the Bradmill Group and firms in similar situations.The future of Bradmill and its workers, however, depends on the sale of the business and the decisions of its new owners. The Government understands that at least parts of the Bradmill business continue to trade well.(11) The fundamental purpose of the Regional Assistance Programme (RAP) is to generate employment in metropolitan, regional and remote Australia by encouraging local community action to boost business growth and create sustainable jobs. The major element of the programme concerns community-based projects aimed at generating jobs and business growth in local areas with a particular focus on building the skills base of a region.The national projects element of the RAP supports projects of national significance and also enables government to respond on a case by case basis to situations such as natural disasters or local economic crises in areas where business closures have a devastating impact on a small, specialised economy.Should the Bradmill plant close, the Government would need to consider a full range of options, including potential employment opportunities which might be available in the broader Melbourne labour market.(12) The Department of Employment, Workplace Relations and Small Business, which administers the RAP, is not aware of the `Fact Sheet'. The RAP has published guidelines that are available on the Department's website.(13) If Bradmill is forced to close, Bradmill workers will receive the full range of assistance available to job seekers through Job Network members.(14) The Department of Employment, Workplace Relations and Small Business is not aware of this `Fact Sheet'. The RAP has published guidelines that are available on the Department's website.26792(Question No. 2434)243426792McClelland, Robert, MPMr McClellandJK6BartonALP00 asked the Attorney-General, upon notice, on 6 March 2001:(1) How have the 1995 amendments to the Family Law Act impacted upon the rate at which mothers and fathers have been granted residence (custody) orders by the Family Court.(2) What steps is he taking to ensure that the needs of women and men are being addressed equally under the Family Law Act.26792Williams, Daryl, MPMr Williams7V5TangneyLPAttorney-General10—The answer to the honourable member's question is as follows:(1) The Family Court of Australia has provided statistics on custody/residence order outcomes from 1993-94 to 1999-2000. The statistics tell us the numbers of orders granted each year, the numbers of orders granted in favour of fathers, mothers, joint custody/split residence and other applicants, and the percentage of total orders granted for each outcome:Table: Custody/Residence Order Outcomes - 1993-94 to 1999-00* In favour ofIn favour ofJoint/splitIn favour of otherTotalFathermothercustody/residenceApplicantNumber1993-9420339500899357127891994-95201797581061373132091995-96210097041021419132441996-97253097951211570141061997-982937104191190665152111998-992867100471162577146531999-002750947386372713813Percentages1993-9415.90%74.30%7.00%2.80%100.00%1994-9515.30%73.90%8.00%2.80%100.00%1995-9615.90%73.30%7.70%3.20%100.00%1996-9717.90%69.40%8.60%4.00%100.00%1997-9819.30%68.50%7.80%4.40%100.00%1998-9919.60%68.60%7.90%3.90%100.00%1999-0019.91%68.58%6.25%5.26%100.00%Source Data: Outcomes Report Blackstone*Notes:Orders made in the Family Court of Western Australia are excluded, as data is not available.Data for Darwin Registry have been available only since 1996-97.Figures include both orders made by consent and orders made as a result of contested hearings.The concepts were changed from custody and access to parental responsibility by the Family Law Reform Act 1995 which was proclaimed on 11 June 1996.“Joint” custody/residence is where the order is for each child to spend some time residing with each parent and “split” custody/residence is where the order is for each parent to have one or more of their children residing with them on a full time basis.The statistics cannot tell us the impact of the 1995 reforms on these outcomes. Several factors, including the introduction of simplified procedures by the Family Court in 1996 and the increase in unrepresented litigants have impacted on the outcomes of applications for parenting orders, to an extent which is difficult to measure.However, the raw data shows a steady increase since 1994-95 in the number of residence orders made in favour of fathers. In 1999-2000 almost 20% of residence orders were made in favour of fathers, compared to almost 16% of custody orders in 1994-95.(2) The provisions of the Family Law Act 1975, pursuant to which the Family Court is required to make decisions, apply to men and women equally. The Court evaluates individual cases on the basis of the evidence before it, and this inevitably involves a balancing process. However, protecting the best interests of a child, or children, involved must remain the overriding concern.The Family Law Amendment Act 2000 introduced a three stage process designed to protect the welfare of children of separated parents whilst at the same time preventing, or significantly reducing, the stress brought about by parents using contact issues as a means of continuing conflict with their former partner.The three stages are:· preventative measures, to improve communication between separated parents and educating parents about their respective responsibilities in relation to their children;· remedial measures, to enable the parents to resolve issues of conflict about parenting; and· punitive measures, to ensure that, with continuing non-compliance, a parent is punished for deliberate disregard of a court order.In addition to the above measures, as a joint initiative with the Minister for Family and Community Services, I have established a high-level advisory group to find ways to improve the pathways through the family law system. The Family Law Pathways Advisory Group was established in May 2000 and has consulted all the key players in the family law system. The Group has met on five occasions and is due to report to Government shortly on the issues families face as they move through the system.26794(Question No. 2435)243526794McClelland, Robert, MPMr McClellandJK6BartonALP00 asked the Attorney-General, upon notice, on 6 March 2001:(1) Are there currently any unfilled judicial vacancies on the Federal Court; if so, where.(2) Are any judicial vacancies on the Federal Court due or likely to become vacant in 2001; if so, when and where.(3) Are there now, or is there likely to be later in 2001, any judicial vacancies on the Federal Court in Western Australia.(4) What is the usual process by which judicial appointments are made to the Federal Court and does he have portfolio responsibility for proposing to Cabinet the names of proposed new Federal Court judges.(5) Is the process any different in circumstances in which he is under consideration for such an appointment; if so, how is it different.26794Williams, Daryl, MPMr Williams7V5TangneyLPAttorney-General10—The answer to the honourable member's question is as follows:(1) and (2) The Hon Justice Jane Mathews and the Hon Justice Marcus Einfeld have resigned as judges of the Court in Sydney effective from 6 April and 16 April 2001, respectively. The Hon Justice Margaret Stone was appointed with effect from 9 October 2000 in anticipation of the retirement of Justice Mathews. A replacement appointment for Justice Einfeld is under consideration.No further resignations are expected this year, nor will any of the Judges of the Court attain the compulsory retirement age of 70 during 2001.(3) See (1) and (2) above.(4) As the Minister responsible for the administration of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976, I have responsibility for proposing to Cabinet new judicial appointments to the Federal Court. The steps in the process of appointing judges to the Federal Court are as follows:(i) I consult personally with the Chief Justice of the Federal Court, other members and former members of the judiciary, members of the legal profession and others in relation to a proposed appointment.(ii) The appointment is considered by Cabinet.(iii) The formal appointment is made by the Governor-General in Council.(5) These circumstances have not arisen.26794(Question No. 2438)243826794Tanner, Lindsay, MPMr TannerYU5MelbourneALP00 asked the Minister for Financial Services and Regulation, upon notice, on 7 March 2001:(1) What is the 2000-2001 budget for the Consumer Affairs Division of Treasury.(2) Is he able to say whether there are any other consumer affairs related allocations in the 2000-2001 Budget in the Treasury or other portfolios; if so, what are the full details of those allocations.(3) What were the (a) 1999-2000 and (b) 1998-99 budgeted allocations and actual expenditure for the Consumer Affairs Division of Treasury.(4) What is the current average staff level in the Consumer Affairs Division of Treasury and what were the average staff levels in (a) 2000, (b) 1999 and (c) 1998.26794Hockey, Joe, MPMr HockeyDK6North SydneyLPMinister for Financial Services and Regulation10—The answer to the honourable member's question is as follows:(1) The operational budget (salaries and administrative expenses) for Consumer Affairs Division (CAD) of Treasury in 2000-2001 is $2.828M. (2) Within Markets Group in Treasury both Consumer Affairs Division and Financial Markets Division have specific consumer affairs related allocations. Approximately $960,000 has been allocated in Financial Markets Division in relation to consumer financial services and markets. It could be expected that other Departments and agencies have specific consumer affairs related allocations. Details of these allocations for 2000-2001 would need to be sought from the specific Departments/agencies.(3) (a) The budget allocation for 1999-2000 was $2.918M. Actual expenditure was $2.679M. (b) CAD joined Treasury on 20 October 1998. The budget allocation for the period 20 October 1998 to 30 June 1999 (transferred from DISR) was $2.222M. Actual expenditure was $2.109M.(4) The current staffing level in CAD is 29. The average staffing levels for previous years are as follows: (a) 2000 - 26. (b) 1999 - 24. (c) 1998 - For the period 20 October 1998 (when CAD joined Treasury) to 31 December 1998, the average staffing level was 30.26795(Question No. 2439)243926795Tanner, Lindsay, MPMr TannerYU5MelbourneALP00 asked the Minister for Financial Services and Regulation, upon notice, on 7 March 2001:(1) Will he provide a list of all of the appointments of consumer representatives he has made in his capacity as Minister for Financial Services and Regulation.(2) What are the qualifications and experience of the consumer representatives that he has appointed.(3) What criteria does he use when appointing consumer representatives.26795Hockey, Joe, MPMr HockeyDK6North SydneyLPMinister for Financial Services and Regulation10—The answer to the honourable member's question is as follows:(1) Attachment A lists the current consumer representatives appointed by the Minister for Financial Services and Regulation.(2) Consumer representatives carry a broad range of qualifications and experience which assists them in making objective, merit-based decisions; in negotiating and conciliating; and in exercising sound and fair judgement in the roles they undertake.(3) The selection criteria used when appointing consumer representatives varies between schemes, but may include:- interest and expertise in consumer affairs;- knowledge of the field of interest relevant to the scheme and the regulatory framework, or an ability to gain this knowledge quickly.CURRENT CONSUMER REPRESENTATIVESAppointed by the Minister for Financial Services and Regulation Ms Mary RadisichInsurance Brokers Dispute Facility (IBDF) - Insurance Brokers Compliance Council (IBCC)Mr Bob BaldwinMr Denis NelthorpeMr Geoff CrickMr Craig HigginbothamInsurance Enquiries and Complaints Limited (IEC) BoardMr Frank HoffmannGeneral Insurance Claims Review PanelsMr Tony Issa, OAMMs Jenni MackMr David LidbetterMr Tony DevlinFinancial Industry Complaints Service Limited (FICS) - BoardMr Bob BaldwinNational Code of Practice for the Building and Construction Industry - Codes Administration CommitteeMs Rosie AtkinsonMs Kate KeatingCredit Union Dispute Reference Centre Pty Ltd (CUDRC) CouncilMr Jason LiMortgage Industry Review Committee - Mortgage Industry Ombudsman Scheme26796(Question No. 2440)244026796Kerr, Duncan, MPMr KerrRH4DenisonALP00 asked the Minister representing the Minister for Family and Community Services, upon notice, on 7 March 2001:(1) Is the Government considering closing registries for the Social Security Appeals Tribunal in Tasmania and the Northern Territory.(2) Is it a fact that Tasmania has a higher proportion of its population receiving social security benefits than other States and the ACT which will retain registries.(3) How many hearings were held in Tasmania for the last year for which records are available, compared with those for the ACT.(4) If the Tasmanian and Northern Territory registries are to close, does the action conflict with the Government's professed commitments to regional and rural Australia.26796Anthony, Larry, MPMr AnthonyXJ6RichmondNPMinister for Community Services10—The Minister for Family and Community Services has provided the following answer to the honourable member's question:(1) The Government is not considering closing registries of the Social Security Appeals Tribunal (SSAT) in Tasmania and the Northern Territory. However, as announced by the Attorney-General on 22 March 2001, the Government will continue to consult interest groups about amendments to the legislation that would replace the SSAT and other tribunals with a single independent Administrative Review Tribunal (ART). A consequence of the Government's goal of establishing an ART would be to combine the registries of the various existing tribunals.(2) As this question appears to be based on an incorrect assumption that the Tasmanian registry of the SSAT will be closed, there is no necessity to provide the details requested which were apparently intended to reinforce an argument against closure of the Tasmanian registry.(3) During 1999-2000 there were 387 appeals finalised in Tasmania. In the same period there were 327 appeals finalised in Canberra.(4) In view of the answer to (1), this question is not applicable.26796(Question No. 2445)244526796O'Connor, Gavan, MPMr O'ConnorWU5CorioALP00 asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, upon notice, on 8 March 2001:(1) What funds have been allocated by the Government to structural adjustment in the dairy industry in Australia.(2) How were these funds raised.(3) Is the dairy structural adjustment program funded by a levy on drinking milk and by consumers.(4) What Federal Government funds are in the recent package of assistance to the dairy industry.26796Truss, Warren, MPMr TrussGT4Wide BayNPMinister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry10—The answer to the honourable member's question is as follows:(1) The Government has allocated $1.78 billion dollars for structural adjustment in the dairy industry.(2) These funds are being raised through a levy of 11 cents per litre on liquid milk products comprising whole-milk, modified milk, Ultra Heat Treated (UHT) milk and flavoured milk. Sales of imported milk are also covered by the levy.(3) Yes. The dairy structural adjustment program is being funded through the imposition of a levy on drinking milk. (4) The Federal Government is providing $1.78 billion in funds to assist dairy farmers and dairy dependent communities adjust to deregulation. Consumers are ultimate beneficiaries of market milk deregulation. These funds are being raised through the imposition of the 11 cent levy over about 8 years on liquid milk products.26797(Question No. 2457)245726797Murphy, John, MPMr Murphy83DLoweALP00 asked the Minister for Education, Training and Youth Affairs, upon notice, on 26 March 2001:(1) As part of the GST compensation package, has the Government agreed to provide primary schools with a grant of $28m to enable them to purchase Australian books for their libraries.(2) Does the $28m equate to approximately $2.50 additional funding per student per year, totalling $10 per student over four years; if not, does the grant equal $0.635 additional funding per student per year, totalling $2.50 per student over four years.(3) Will the grants be made available to primary schools in March or April 2001; if not, (a) why not and (b) when will schools be able to access these grants.(4) How will the State Governments administer the correct payment to each school.26797Kemp, Dr David, MPDr KempBT4GoldsteinLPMinister for Education, Training and Youth Affairs and Minister Assisting the Prime Minister for the Public Service10—The answer to the honourable member's question is as follows:(1) The Grants to Primary School Libraries Programme is a Commonwealth initiative that forms part of the Book Industry Assistance Plan. The programme's objective is to provide financial assistance to libraries of Australian primary schools in connection with the acquisition of books of Australian authors or books produced in Australia. The Commonwealth allocation for this programme is $27.4m over four years.(2) The $28m equates to an estimated additional 1,866,600 books or associated resources to be purchased by primary school libraries over the next four years. This assumes an average cost of $15 per book or resource.(3) The contracts between the Commonwealth and the State Governments, Independent School Associations and Catholic Education Commissions have been sent out and funding will be provided by the Commonwealth on receipt of the signed contracts. It is up to the individual authorities as to when the funding will be distributed to individual schools.(4) The method of administration and delivery of funds is a matter for the individual State bodies to decide. The contract states, however, that they must ensure that primary schools with less than 20 primary students receive $50 and that the remaining funds must be distributed to the remaining schools based on an equal amount per student.26797(Question No. 2461)246126797Crosio, Janice, MPMrs Crosio7T4ProspectALP00 asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs, upon notice, on 27 March 2001:(1) When does the term of Michael Baume, Australian Consul-General in New York, expire.(2) How many offices and official residences has Mr Baume used during his term.(3) What were the addresses of the (a) offices and (b) official residences.(4) Were any (a) renovations, (b) restorations, (c) improvements, (d) additions, (e) relocations and (f) repairs made to, or carried out on, the (i) buildings, (ii) grounds, (iii) furniture and (iv) fittings at any of the offices or official residence of the Consul-General during the term of Mr Baume.(5) What was cost of each (a) renovation, (b) restoration, (c) improvement, (d) addition, (e) relocation and (f) repair made to the offices and official residence of the Consul-General during the term of Mr Baume.(6) What were the names of the (a) tradesperson or companies which carried out the work referred to in part (4) and (b) persons or companies from whom additions and new furniture were purchased.(7) What was the total sum of Commonwealth funds used for (a) renovations, (b) restorations, (c) improvements, (d) additions, (e) relocations and (f) repairs to the buildings, grounds, furniture and fittings of the Consular-Generals office and official residences during the term of Mr Baume. 26798Downer, Alexander, MPMr Downer4G4MayoLPMinister for Foreign Affairs10—The answer to the honourable member's question is as follows:(1) This year (2001).(2) Three offices and one residence.(1) (a) Rockefeller Plaza, 630 Fifth Avenue, New York from October 1996 until December 1997. 1 Liberty Plaza, New York, from January to March 1998. 150 East 42 Street, New York from April 1998.(b) Apartment 5/6C, 1 Beekman Place, New York.(2) (i) (a, b, c, d and f) New offices, including the Consul-General's office, were fitted out for the Consulate-General and Australia's mission to the United Nations at 150 East 42nd Street, New York.Minor or routine renovations and repairs have been carried out at the official residence including touch up painting in bathrooms, servicing and repair of major appliances (including air conditioning), replacement of broken window glass and normal plumbing repairs.(e) The Consulate-General and Mission to the United Nations relocated (at a considerable rental saving) from their former separate premises to their new co-located offices in 1998. The Consulate-General spent a brief period in rent free transit offices between the time it vacated its old Rockefeller Plaza offices and the move into its new offices at 42nd Street.(ii) (a, b, c, d, e and f)The offices of the Consulate-General do not have, nor have had, any grounds attached to them.The small shared grounds of the official residence are maintained from co-operative funds.(iii and iv) New furniture and fittings were provided in the offices of the Consulate-General and Mission to the United Nations at 42nd Street as part of the relocation.One sofa was recovered, and a replacement industrial refrigerator/freezer purchased for the official residence.(3) (a, b, c, d, e, f) AUD 87,144 was spent on the relocation of the Consulate-General to its new premises at 42nd St (which includes the move into and out of the interim offices at Liberty Plaza). Fit out of offices for the Consulate-General and the Mission to the United Nations at 42nd St, including window and floor treatments, and furniture was AUD 3.16 million.Official residence minor repairs and maintenance was AUD 21,760, new sofa covering was AUD 4,952 and replacement refrigerator/freeze was AUD 7,710.(6) (a) The fit out of offices at 42nd St was carried out by LEHR Construction Co. Relocation of offices from Rockefeller Plaza via Liberty Plaza to 42nd St was carried out by Central Moving and Storage Co. Inc.At the official residence: servicing of the air-conditioning units was carried out by ABCO Mechanical Corp; painting by Gotham Painting Co; window glass replaced by Manhattan Shade and Glass Co; servicing of major appliances by Manhattan Gas and Electric Co.; plumbing services by Glashower Co; fire extinguishers serviced by Fire Extinguishers Co; sofa recovered by Kandp Upholstery Co.(b) Furniture for the new offices at 42nd Street was purchased from Sterling Interior Group and Design Craft in Australia. The refrigerator/freezer for the official residence was purchased from Krups Kitchen and Bath Co.(7) The total cost of a, b, c, d and f, for the Consulate-General is unable to be separated from the combined costs for the Consulate-General and the Mission to the United Nations. As stated above, the total cost of fit out, including window and floor treatments, and furniture for the Consulate-General and the Mission to the United Nations was AUD 3.16 million.In relation to the official residence, Commonwealth funds expended total AUD 34,382.(e)As stated above the cost of relocating the Consulate-General offices from Rockefeller Plaza via Liberty Plaza to 42nd St was AUD 87,144. 26799(Question No. 2462)246226799Crosio, Janice, MPMrs Crosio7T4ProspectALP00 asked the Minister for Employment Services, upon notice, on 26 March 2001:(1) How many people participated in the Work for the Dole projects in the electoral division of Prospect in (a) 1996, (b) 1997,(c) 1998, (d) 1999, (e) 2000 and (f) 2001.(2) Will he give the locations of each of these projects and a description of the work involved.(3) What organisations were contracted to provide Work for the Dole programs in the electoral division of Prospect.(4) Does he plan to increase Work for the Dole programs; if so, how many new programs will be located in the electoral division of Prospect.26799Brough, Mal, MPMr Brough2K6LongmanLPMinister for Employment Services10—The answer to the honourable member's question is as follows:(1) The Work for the Dole programme was not in operation in 1996. The number of people who commenced in Work for the Dole activities in the electorate of Prospect are as follows.YearCommencements *1997Nil1998515199975620001000 2001152***Based on start date of the activity, some people may have commenced in the following year where activities span more than one calendar year.**As at 30 March 2001(2) The attached table sets out the locations and description of the projects in the electorate of Prospect. The allocation of business to Community Work Coordinators (CWCs) (and sponsors in previous rounds of the programme), is based around Employment Service Areas (ESAs). CWCs are required to make available Work for the Dole places for eligible job seekers resident in the ESA for which the CWC is contracted. ESA boundaries do not coincide with federal electorate boundaries.Therefore in the case of the federal electorate of Prospect, whilst these projects/activities may be located in the Prospect electorate, and some participants would reside in the Prospect electorate, participants may have been drawn from parts of the ESA/s that are located in neighbouring federal electorates. Furthermore, projects/activities located in other parts of the ESA/s that fall into neighbouring federal electorates may recruit participants living in the Prospect electorate.(3) The attached table sets out the organisations that were contracted to provide Work for the Dole programme projects in the electoral division of Prospect.(4) Decisions of the future of the programme will be considered in the context of the Budget. Project NameCWC/Sponsor NameProject DescriptionLocationsBlacktown City JoblinkMission Australia (JNM)Individual work experience placements in a wide variety of employment fields. BlacktownBlacktown community placements Uniting Church in Aust. Property TrustIndividual work experience placements in conjunction with a variety of community not-for-profit organisation. Eg general clerical, office skills, landscaping gardening, animal care, child care & hospitality. Blacktown Blacktown Council Work Experience Penrith Skills For Jobs LtdTo clear a new exercise area for Blacktown dog pound, to provide additional assistance to the pound animals and to remove graffiti. BlacktownCabramatta Community Work Experience Mission Australia (JNM)Individual work experience in a variety of community organisations. Various in Cabramatta and FairfieldCabramatta Creek recreational development Mission Australia (JNM)In conjunction with Fairfield City Council. Development of the Cabramatta Creek recreational area and walking track. FairfieldCatholic Schools - Teacher Aides - Fairfield Liverpool Uniting Church in Aust. Property TrustTeacher aides in primary and secondary Catholic schools in the Fairfield/Liverpool labour region Sydney. Bonnyrigg, Bossley Park, Horsley Park, Hoxton Park, Hinchin Brook, Liverpool, Lurnea, Moorebank, Mt Pritchard, Prestons, Fairfield, Wakeley Casula, Bonnyrigg HeightsCommunity Facility Support Penrith Skills For Jobs LtdA range of indoor and outdoor tasks to enhance the services of local councils, health services and education institutes in Western SydneyBlacktown, Quakers Hill, RiverstoneCommunity Initiative DecemberPenrith Skills For Jobs LtdA diverse range of indoor and outdoor activities with community organisations or local councils in Western SydneyBlacktown, PenrithEastern Creek Raceway Project Penrith Skills For Jobs LtdImprovement to toilet blocks, landscaping of grounds and general maintenance. Eastern CreekFairfield City Farm H&H Accredited Training AustralasiaVarious tasks at a city farm. Ranging from seed collection & propagation to administration & restaurant assistance City Farm 31 Darling Street, Abbotsbury NSW 2176Fairfield City Farm Heritage & Beautification Program Mission Australia (JNM)Tasks: landscape planning, painting, carpentry, brick laying. Basic horticulture, noxious weed control, landscape practice, planting, light construction, tool identification & use, plant identification & care, & pathway construction.Fairfield City Farm -Fairfield City MuseumMission Australia (JNM)The preservation of historical items and records.SmithfieldFairfield Heritage CentreMission Australia (JNM)Preservation and presentation of historical items and records to the public. SmithfieldFairfield Work Experience 11 Mission Australia (JNM)To provide work experience in various non profit areas within the local area in councils, community centre, eg office administration, warehousing, gardening & general maintenanceFairfield FoodbankUniting Church in Aust. Property TrustThe project involves participants in warehousing and food processing at foodbanks facility in Wetherill Park.Wetherill ParkFoodbank 2 FairfieldUniting Church in Aust. Property TrustThe project involves participants in warehouse duties including preparing food parcels at foodbanks facility in Wetherill Park.Wetherill ParkFoodbank 2 MacarthurUniting Church in Aust. Property TrustThe project involves participants in warehouse duties including preparing food parcels at foodbanks Wetherill Park facilities.Wetherill ParkGraffiti removal - Blacktown City Mission Australia (JNM)Removal of graffiti from boundary fences on 30 public reserves, with a letterbox drop of information leaflets & follow-up work on new graffitiLocal reserves in the Blacktown City areaGraffitti Removal ProgramMission Australia (JNM)The project involves the removal of graffiti from boundary fences of 30 public reserves. BlacktownJobquest Brokerage June 2000 Penrith Skills For Jobs LtdParticipants are involved in collecting and collating family history information, art collection information, developing CD ROM for databases, assist in pre-schools, establish a sensory garden and landscaping and handyman tasks Penrith and BlacktownJobquest Brokerage September 2000 Penrith Skills For Jobs LtdA diverse range of indoor and outdoor activities with community organisations or local councils in Western SydneyBlackett, Eastern Creek, St Marys, Blacktown, RiverstoneLifeline Work Experience Penrith Skills For Jobs LtdWorking in Bluebird clothing outlets. Work experience includes shop front of the retail outlet, stock control and preparation and administration.Blacktown, Riverstone, Springwood, St Marys, BlacktownLiverpool/Fairfield Community Assistance H&H Accredited Training Australasia Inc.This project is designed to enable participants to gain work experience in office administration & handyman positionsLiverpool, FairfieldMulticultural Community Work Experience Mission Australia (JNM)Provide people of non-English speaking background the relevant and individualised work experience in a wide range of non profit organisations, churches, hospitals, councils and migrant resource centres.Various locations in the Fairfield/Liverpool regionNative fauna areaH&H Accredited Training Australasia Inc.Design, construction & implementation of a new exhibit for educational purposes. Fairfield, Liverpool, AbbotsburyOffice and Community Based Work Experience Program The Salvation Army (Vic) Property TrustIndividual work experience placements made in conjunction with a variety of community not-for-profit organisations. Participants involved in filing, data entry, typing , reception, child care support, gardening, soft landscaping, lawn mowing, customer service and other tasks.Blacktown DistrictOpen Spaces Enhancement Program Uniting Church In Aust. Property TrustConstruction of waterway rejuvenation, waterflow management statistic gathering, soil erosion and bank stabilisation, heavy flow prevention.BlacktownOrphan School Creek bank restoration stage 2 H&H Accredited Training AustralasiaParticipants involved in a wide variety of tasks that will enhance the surrounding bushland area and increase the accessibility of facilities to local community members.PrairiewoodProspect Environment Project Penrith Skills For Jobs LtdRestoration and revegetation of about 80 acres of eroded land on the CSIRO Ian Clunies Ross Animal Research Centre in Prospect.ProspectRetail in second-hand clothing Uniting Church In Australia (NSW)Work experience in fashion retail outlets Locations: Parramatta, Fairfield, Narellan, Campbelltown, PenrithSalvo's Community Work Team - Environmental Program The Salvation Army (Vic) Property TrustParticipants become part of a working team in the horticultural facility Cumberland Forest, ProspectThe Salvation Army Joblink Horticulture Program The Salvation Army (Vic) Property TrustParticipants are part of a working team within a 35 acre property which includes a heritage Cumberland Plain Forest, horticulture centre and sports field.Blacktown - Prospect EndWestern Sydney Canine Affairs Complex H&H Accredited Training AustralasiaWork experience in areas such as landscaping, garden maintenance, tree planting, fence repairs, drainage worksErskine ParkWestern Sydney Scout Hall Renovations Penrith Skills For Jobs LtdExterior and interior renovations to a number of scout halls in the western suburbs of Sydney.Penrith, Blacktown, St Marys, GlenbrookWoodland Reclamation Project H&H Accredited Training Australasia Inc.Reclamation of the last 9% of the cumberland plains bushland through eradication of woody weeds Bossley Park, LiverpoolThe Blacktown Community Conservation & Restoration Mission AustraliaWork experience in light construction , maintenance, landscaping, cataloguing and preservation of artefacts and memorabilia on a range of heritage sites.BlacktownBlacktown Community Project Mission AustraliaIndividualised work experience placements with a wide range of community not-for-profit organisations such as community and neighbourhood centre and migrant resource groupsBlacktownMake A Movie Project Wesley Employment and TrainingProduction of a half hour documentary developed by the participantsBlacktownNurragingy picnic grounds Mission AustraliaTo establish a presentable park for the local community BlacktownOlympic/Koala Street Tree Planting Mission AustraliaConstruction of presentable streetscapes for the Olympic Games and production of food for koalas at Featherdale Wildlife Park.BlacktownWestern Syd. Community Work Exp. Project Mission AustraliaIndividualised work experience placements with a wide range of community not-for-profit organisations such as community and neighbourhood centre and migrant resource groupsBlacktownNurragingy Reserve bush regeneration Mission AustraliaDevelopment of bush regeneration skills, improvement of the community's main park area.BlacktownBlacktown conservation zones Mission AustraliaFencing, signage and bush regeneration in Blacktown conservation zones BlacktownLions Park/Bicentennial Museum Mission AustraliaDevelopment of a presentable park for the local community to relax in. BlacktownKings Langley State Street Tree Reserve Mission AustraliaDevelopment of horticultural and landscaping skillsBlacktownGraffiti removal - Blacktown City Mission AustraliaDevelopment of painting and cleaning skills to enable the removal of graffitiBlacktownBreakfast Creek bush regeneration Mission AustraliaDevelopment of skills and knowledge in the fields of bush regeneration , plant knowledge and ecologyBlacktownNurragingy Reserve Americas Area Mission AustraliaDevelopment of landscaping and paving skills to create a presentable park for the communityBlacktownWWW.HAT/S.DOIN'@HSI.AU Hawkesbury Skills IncorporatedMulti media project. Construction and property maintenance, horticulture and landscapingBlacktownThe North West Respite Assistance Project - II Northwest Disability Services IncPlacement of participants in a respite service to support those with a disabilityBlacktownThe Fairfield Heritage Centre Project Mission AustraliaWork experience at Fairfield Heritage CentreFairfieldThe Fairfield Indigenous Flora Park Project CSA Training Services IncPreservation of Fairfield Indigenous Flora ParkFairfieldThe Fairfield City Farm Project CSA Training Services IncPlanting of fauna and flora, landscaping, fencing and pasture improvementsFairfieldOrphan School Creek regeneration H&H Accredited Training Australasia IncEnhancement of environmental and recreational facilities at Orphan Creek SchoolFairfieldFairfeild Children's Resource Centre CSA Training Services IncWorking in a team environment at the Children's Resource CentreFairfieldStockdale Reserve cycleway CSA Training Services IncCycleway construction, landscaping and area beautificationFairfieldExperience matters Wesley Employment and TrainingProvide community assistance placements in a range of local host organisationsFairfieldFairfield Heritage Centre Project Mission AustraliaImprovement and enhancement of facilities at Fairfield City MuseumFairfieldMt Pritchard cycleway and landscaping Mission AustraliaConstruction of a cycleway in the Fairfield CouncilFairfieldWestern Sydney Regional Park development Mission AustraliaCreation of public walking and bicycle tracks in conjunction with Sydney Regional Park.FairfieldCabramatta Creek beautification Mission AustraliaCreation of recreational areas in conjunction with Fairfield CouncilFairfieldWetherill Park Mission AustraliaDevelopment of worm farming, land rehabilitation, landscaping, horticulture and repair to school yard.FairfieldFairfield bike track & Prospect Creek rehabilitation restoration CSA Training Services IncFairfield bike track and Prospect Creek restorationFairfield26806(Question No. 2463)246326806Crosio, Janice, MPMrs Crosio7T4ProspectALP00 asked the Minister for Employment, Workplace Relations and Small Business, upon notice, on 26 March 2001:(1) How many applications were received by his Department for access to the Employee Entitlements Support Scheme (EESS) in 2000.(2) How many applications were (a) approved and (b) rejected.(3) What sum of Commonwealth funds was paid out through the EESS in 2000.(4) What was the (a) largest and (b) smallest sum paid out through the EESS in 2000.(5) How many times was the maximum entitlement paid to a claimant.26806Abbott, Tony, MPMr AbbottEZ5WarringahLPMinister for Employment, Workplace Relations and Small Business10—The answer to the honourable member's question is as follows:(1) The Department received 3391 applications in relation to the Employee Entitlements Support Scheme (EESS) in 2000.(2) 1493 applications were approved during 2000 and a further 127 applicants were determined to be ineligible. The remaining 1771 applications received in 2000 have been, or are being processed in 2001.(3) $3,176,073 of Commonwealth funds was paid out through the EESS in 2000.(4) The largest sum paid out through the EESS in 2000 was $9900.42 and the smallest sum was $14.27. These amounts would have been doubled if the States or the Australian Capital Territory had contributed to the Scheme. (No claimants from the Northern Territory, the only state or territory contributor, were paid in 2000.)(5) The maximum entitlement ($20,000 if the Commonwealth and the relevant state or territory contribute, or $10,000 if the Commonwealth only contributes) has not been paid to any claimant since the inception of the Scheme. However, some claimants would have received 100 per cent of what they were owed for components covered by the Scheme if the relevant state of territory had contributed.26806(Question No. 2465)246526806Crosio, Janice, MPMrs Crosio7T4ProspectALP00 asked the Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs, upon notice, on 27 March 2001:(1) Has he or his Department considered repealing s.17 of the Australian Citizenship Act to allow dual citizenship to Australian born persons; if not, why not.(2) How many overseas born dual citizens live in Australia.(3) Is the Government considering the dual citizenship issue.26806Ruddock, Philip, MPMr Ruddock0J4BerowraLPMinister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs and Minister for Reconciliation and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Affairs10—The answer to the honourable member's question is as follows:(1) The Australian Citizenship Council, an independent advisory body which I appointed in August 1998 to provide advice on citizenship matters, recommended in their report released in February 2000 that s17 of the Australian Citizenship Act 1948 be repealed.I expect that the Government response to the report of the Australian Citizenship Council will be released shortly.(2) An estimated 4.4 million Australian citizens hold another citizenship. Most of these are Australian citizens born overseas and their Australian-born children.(3) The Government is considering issues surrounding the repeal of s17 of the Australian Citizenship Act 1948 in the context of its response to the report of the Australian Citizenship Council.26807(Question No. 2466)246626807Crosio, Janice, MPMrs Crosio7T4ProspectALP00 asked the Minister for Education, Training and Youth Affairs, upon notice, on 26 March 2001:(1) Is there a Jobs Pathway Program service provider operating within the electoral division of Prospect; if not, why not; if so, what is the name and the address of the Job Pathway Program service provider.(2) How many people living in the electoral division of Prospect have found employment through the Jobs Pathway Program.(3) How many (a) full time, (b) part time and (c) casual positions has the Job Pathway Program filled in the electoral division of Prospect.26807Kemp, Dr David, MPDr KempBT4GoldsteinLPMinister for Education, Training and Youth Affairs and Minister Assisting the Prime Minister for the Public Service10—The answer to the honourable member's question is as follows:(1) There are two Jobs Pathway Programme (JPP) service providers operating with the NSW electorate of Prospect. These are:Penrith Skills for Jobs Ltd trading as JobquestSuite 101, 114-116 Henry StreetPENRITH NSW 2750Australian Sports Industry Group Training Company Ltd14 Fennell StreetNORTH PARRAMATTA NSW 2151(2) The JPP is not an employment programme. Rather, the programme focuses on providing transitional assistance to young people who have recently left school or are thinking of leaving school in the following 12 months. The objective of JPP is to assist young people make a successful transition from school to work, further education or training through the provision of assistance that focuses on the skills and knowledge required to reduce the risk of their falling through the cracks and becoming unemployed.(3) The JPP is not an employment programme.26807(Question No. 2468)246826807Ferguson, Laurie, MPMr Laurie Ferguson8T4ReidALP00 asked the Minister for Defence, upon notice, on 27 March 2001:(1) On what date did the Government receive the final report of the Review of the Australian Services Cadet Scheme entitled Cadets: The Future.(2) On what date was the report released to the public.(3) Of the 48 recommendations contained in the report, which have been (a) adopted by the Government, (b) rejected by the Government and (c) deferred for further consideration.(4) What changes, if any, has the Government made to the management arrangements for the Services Cadet Scheme since the release of the report.26807Reith, Peter, MPMr ReithWI4FlindersLPMinister for Defence10—The answer to the honourable member's question is as follows:(1) 25 August 2000.(2) 8 December 2000.(3) (a), (b) and (c) The Department of Defence is currently formulating a plan for the progressive implementation of the report recommendations, which is to be considered by the Government. (4) On 1 April 2001, Major General D.C. Low Choy AM, MBE, RFD, was appointed to the new position of Director-General of Cadets. A Directorate of Defence Force Cadets is being established to bring together the management of the three Service cadet elements.26808(Question No. 2469)246926808Ferguson, Laurie, MPMr Laurie Ferguson8T4ReidALP00 asked the Minister for Defence, upon notice, on 27 March 2001:(1) Does the Defence Whistleblower Scheme, as detailed in Circular Memorandum 48/97 of 24 July 1997, have a statutory basis; if so, under what legislation or regulations does the scheme operate.(2) If the scheme does not have a statutory basis, what are the implications of this for potential whistleblowers.(3) Are complaints of wrongdoing under the scheme to be disclosed only to staff of the Fraud Investigation and Recovery Directorate on a need to know basis; if so, what redress is available to whistleblowers if the content of their complaint is disclosed to others without their consent.(4) Are whistleblowers to be given organisational protection against harassment or career threatening retaliatory action; if so, who within Defence is responsible for providing such protection and what redress is available to whistleblowers who subsequently experience harassment and retaliatory action.(5) Does the Inspector-General's unit maintain statistics on the number of allegations of wrongdoing received under the scheme; if so, how many such allegations have been recorded since July 1997.(6) As a result of allegations of wrongdoing received under the Scheme, how many individuals have been successfully prosecuted for offences under (a) the Crimes Act 1914, (b) the Public Service Act 1922 or (c) the Defence Force Discipline Act 1982.26808Reith, Peter, MPMr ReithWI4FlindersLPMinister for Defence10—The answer to the honourable member's question is as follows:(1) It is an administrative scheme. The Department of Defence is presently developing a whistleblower scheme that meets the statutory obligations under Section 16 of the Public Service Act 1999 and Division 2.2 of the Public Service Regulations.(2) The scheme is administrative in nature and therefore most actions taken under the scheme are administrative. However, where it can be proven that breaches of the Crimes Act 1914, the Public Service Act 1999 or the Defence Force Discipline Act 1982 have occurred, then action under the relevant legislation is normally taken.(3) Under the Defence Whistleblower Scheme, no assurances are given to whistleblowers that the allegations they make will not be disclosed in the course of investigation. Indeed, if allegations against an individual appear to have some foundation then natural justice requires that the individual concerned be given the opportunity to respond to the allegations.(4) Any member of Defence, whether a whistleblower or not, should be protected from harassment, victimisation, discrimination or retaliation. Where an individual signals that this may occur, then it is the responsibility of the Group Manager to take avoiding or remedial action. If a member of Defence was subject to harassment, victimisation, discrimination or retaliation, then it is expected that the matter would be referred for investigation with a view to disciplinary action being taken against the individuals concerned.(5) Records indicate that the Inspector-General Division has received allegations from 16 whistleblowers since 1 July 1997.(6) As a result of the allegations made by the 16 whistleblowers since 1 July 1997, one person has been prosecuted under the Defence Force Discipline Act 1982 and consideration is presently being given as to whether changes should be brought against a second person. Three further cases are currently still under investigation.26809(Question No. 2470)247026809Ferguson, Laurie, MPMr Laurie Ferguson8T4ReidALP00 asked the Minister Assisting the Minister for Defence, upon notice, on 27 March 2001:(1) Following the introduction of the Optional Rent Assistance (ORA) scheme in May 2000, how many Defence personnel without dependants in each State and Territory are currently receiving ORA to live off base.(2) What was the cost to the Budget of the ORA scheme in 1999-2000 and what is the projected cost for 2000-2001.26809Scott, Bruce, MPMr Bruce ScottYT4MaranoaNPMinister for Veterans' Affairs and Minister Assisting the Minister for Defence10—The answer to the honourable member's question is as follows:(1) ACT7NSW501NT11QLD350SA53TAS2VIC77WA0Data as at 16 March 2001(2) 1999-2000 - $0.199 million2000-2001 - $3.07 million26809(Question No. 2480)248026809Sciacca, Con, MPMr Sciacca6J4BowmanALP00 asked the Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs, upon notice, on 28 March 2001:(1) Did he, on 9 March 2001, in a press release entitled Unlawful Workers Picked Up on Building Sites in Sydney, promise the CMFEU a copy of his Department's Employer Awareness Kit; if so, has a copy of the kit been made available to the Union; if not, when will the kit be delivered.(2) Are copies of the kit automatically sent to employers in industries that traditionally have a high incidence of using illegal workers, or are they available only on request.(3) Will he provide a copy of the kit to my office.26809Ruddock, Philip, MPMr Ruddock0J4BerowraLPMinister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs and Minister for Reconciliation and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Affairs10—The answer to the honourable member's question is as follows:(1) I issued the media release referred to on 9 March 2001 and my Department sent copies of the Employer Awareness kit to the CFMEU office in Sydney on that same day.(2) In May 1999, when the current kit and pamphlet Employing Overseas Workers - doing the right thing were released, copies were distributed to all Members of Parliament and Senators and to the Department of Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (DIMA) regional offices for distribution to employers and organisations through DIMA Business Centres and by compliance officers undertaking employer awareness visits, information sessions and compliance operations. Copies were also provided to individuals and organisations that requested them. In addition, approximately 4,500 kits and 41,000 pamphlets were mailed out by the Department to employers in the primary, mining and hospitality industries. The kit is also available on the DIMA Internet homepage. A new edition of the kit is in preparation and will receive similar broad distribution.(3) Yes. That has been done.26809(Question No. 2481)248126809Sciacca, Con, MPMr Sciacca6J4BowmanALP00 asked the Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs, upon notice, on 28 March 2001:(1) How many subclass 457 visas have been issued since 1 October 2000.(2) What is the (a) industry and (b) occupational profile of subclass 457 visas issued since 1 October 2000. 26810Ruddock, Philip, MPMr Ruddock0J4BerowraLPMinister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs and Minister for Reconciliation and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Affairs10—The answer to the honourable member's question is as follows:(1) From 1 October to 31 March 2001 there have been 18,149 subclass 457 visas granted in Australia and overseas - including 1,530 visa grants to Independent Executives (people who come to Australia to establish a business with their own capital).(2) Latest statistics on the industry data will not be available until later in the year. The table provided below shows the industry profile of all Business (long stay) subclass 457 nominations lodged in 1998/99. The occupation data table shows the occupations of all Business (long stay) subclass 457 visas granted to primary applicants overseas from 1 October 2000 to 31 March 2001. IndustryPercemtageAgriculture, Forestry and Fishing2%Mining6%Manufacturing13%Electricity, Gas and Water Supply1%Construction4%Wholesale Trade5%Hospitality (Accommodation, Cafes and Restaurants)8%Transport and Storage2%Communications (including IT)20%Finance and Insurance6%Property and Business Services8%Government Administration and Defence1%Education1%Health and Community Services5%Cultural and Recreational Services5%Personal and Other Services9%Professional/Managerial/Administrative85%ICT Professional25%Managers22%Accountants6%Nurses6%Associate Professionals7%Tradepersons and Related Workers3%Other Workers5%26810(Question No. 2482)248226810Sciacca, Con, MPMr Sciacca6J4BowmanALP00 asked the Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs, upon notice, on 28 March 2001:(1) Are visitors who enter Australia on an Electronic Travel Authority given any physical evidence of the date of issue of the visa, or the date by which they would need to leave Australia to comply with the conditions of that visa.(2) Is a record kept of the number of visitors who have entered Australia on an Electronic Travel Authority and have stayed beyond the terms of that visa claiming to be unaware of the expiry date; if so, how many visitors fell into this category so far this intake year.(3) Does his Department automatically impose a penalty on visitors who have overstayed on Electronic Travel Authorities; if not, in what circumstances will his Department demonstrate leniency.26810Ruddock, Philip, MPMr Ruddock0J4BerowraLPMinister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs and Minister for Reconciliation and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Affairs10—The answer to the honourable member's question is as follows:(1) The Electronic Travel Authority (ETA) is an electronic approval for travel and entry to Australia, which replaces the visa label in the passport and removes the need for application forms. All ETAs authorise stays of 3 months upon arrival. While no physical evidence of an ETA is provided, extensive training of ETA service providers is undertaken to ensure applicants are aware of the conditions of the ETA visas. ETA service providers receive training and literature from my Department, which emphasises that ETAs provide short-term entry to Australia, and are supported by a global network of ETA Liaison Officers stationed in key Immigration offices overseas. Ongoing training by these offices emphasises the need for ETA service providers to make clients aware of the validity and conditions of their ETA or have access to this information. Information leaflets have been widely distributed.All passengers, other than Australian citizens, receive a port and date stamp in their passport as they are processed through the entry and departure control points. For all visa holders, including ETA holders, the arrival stamp represents the commencement of the authorised period of stay.(2) My Department does collect statistics on the number of people who arrive in Australia and do not comply with the departure conditions of the visa on which they entered or any subsequent visa, but not their reasons for failing to depart on time. The current statistics show that some 7151 (0.33%) ETA holders, of which 2,141,779 were lawfully in Australia in the period 01 July 2000 to 31 March 2001, have overstayed.(3) Provisions under the Migration Act 1958 and Migration Regulations impose a three-year exclusion period for anyone overstaying their visa by more than 28 days. There is provision for the three year exclusion to be waived in circumstances where there are compassionate or compelling circumstances that would affect the interests of Australia or an Australian citizen, Australian resident or an eligible New Zealand citizen.26811(Question No. 2484)248426811O'Keefe, Neil, MPMr O'KeefeCE4BurkeALP00 asked the Minister representing the Minister for Family and Community Services, upon notice, on 28 March 2001:(1) Is it intended that the minimum support contribution of $260 p.a. required under s.66 of the Child Support (Assessment) Act 1989 shall apply in the case of a non-custodial parent who is unemployed, but who is excluded from Centrelink payments due to income or asset testing of a different partner ?(2) Is it intended that a non-custodial parent who has no income, be required to pay the minium amount provided under the Act ?(3) Is there scope to apply for exemption under the administration powers delegated to this legislation ?26811Anthony, Larry, MPMr AnthonyXJ6RichmondNPMinister for Community Services10—The answer to the honourable member's question is as follows:(1) It would only apply if the non-resident parent had their own income of at least $260 per annum.(2) A non resident parent who has no income can apply to the Child Support Registrar for the amount payable to be reduced to nil.(3) Section 66A of the Child Support (Assessment) Act 1989 allows for an application to be made to the Child Support Registrar to reduce the amount to nil if the non-resident parent's income is less than $260 per annum.26811(Question No. 2485)248526811Andren, Peter, MPMr AndrenKL6CalareIND00 asked the Minister representing the Minister for the Environment and Heritage, upon notice, on 28 March 2001:(1) Is the Minister able to say whether (a) in 2000, the Sustainable Energy Development Authority (SEDA) won the Prime Minister's Environment Award for Innovation and Excellence, in recognition of its `Green Power' program's achievements in addressing greenhouse gas emissions through renewable and alternative energy initiatives, carbon sequestration, pollution abatement and public education about global warming and (b) the voluntary green power component in electricity accounts is subject to the GST. (2) If so, (a) is it contradictory policy for the Government to be awarding SEDA for its efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions whilst simultaneously deterring people from joining green power initiatives by taxing them and (b) will the Government, in the interest of encouraging involvement in such environmental schemes, consider making such supplies GST free; if not, why not.26812Truss, Warren, MPMr TrussGT4Wide BayNPMinister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry10—The Minister for the Environment and Heritage has provided the following answer to the honourable member's question:(1) (a) The Sustainable Energy Development Authority of New South Wales was awarded the Prime Minister's environment Award for Innovation and Excellence on World Environment Day on 5 June 2000. This award was made in recognition of its achievements in its Green Power Program in curtailing greenhouse gas emissions through a number of initiatives.(b) The voluntary green power component of domestic electricity accounts is subject to GST as it applies to the total cost of electricity consumed by the householder.(2) (a) While it is in the Government's purview to grant awards in recognition of environmental excellence, the Government has no management control over green power programs as these are implemented by States. The Government recognises the significant contribution made by Australians who subscribe to green power programs. Accordingly, the Government made an additional contribution of $26 million to the Renewable Energy Commercialisation Program as compensation for GST on green power programs. The Government also introduced the Photovoltaic Rebate Program to provide incentives for home owners and community organisations to install photovoltaic systems to generate electricity for domestic use. At approximately 50 percent of the capital cost of photovoltaic panels, this more than offsets the cost of the ten percent GST on photovoltaic equipment.(b) The Government does not intend to remove GST from the green power component of domestic electricity charges. The Government believes that through its reform of the taxation system it has been able to substantially increase the public investment in sustainable energy.26812(Question No. 2489)248926812Burke, Anna, MPMs Burke83SChisholmALP00 asked the Minister for Veterans' Affairs, upon notice, on 29 March 2001:On most recent data, how many veteran pension recipients reside in the electoral division of Chisholm and the postcode areas of (a) 3128, (b) 3129, (c) 3125, (d) 3127, (e) 3149, (f) 3148, (g) 3147, (h) 3150, (i) 3168, (j) 3166, (k) 3169 and (l) 3151.26812Scott, Bruce, MPMr Bruce ScottYT4MaranoaNPMinister for Veterans' Affairs and Minister Assisting the Minister for Defence10—The answer to the honourable member's question is as follows:As at 14 April 2001 the number of pension recipients residing in the electoral division of Chisholm was: Disability PensionersVeteran Service PensionersPartner Service PensionersWar Widow PensionersTotal Pensioners1156111595710233646 *Some persons may receive more than one Veterans' Affairs pension. For this reason the total number of pensioners will not match the sum of the different pension types.The table below illustrates the number of pension recipients residing in the following nominated postcode areas as at 14 April 2001: PostcodeDisabilityPensionersVeteran ServicePensionersPartner Service PensionersWar Widow PensionersTotal Pensioners31251761581451785823127141827212337131281811861552026173129153151133106456314718316312717353931481181231101153923149313289246228926315042832528534712043151585655411793166129132991444333168103153136101426316934574737149Total20171875161017956274Many of the above postcode districts do not lie exclusively in the electorate of Chisholm. For this reason the total number of pension recipients in these postcodes do not match the total in the electoral division of Chisholm.* This figure has been derived by matching postcodes to electoral boundaries to determine pensioner numbers by using a predetermined postcode/electoral boundary formula.26813(Question No. 2491)249126813Ferguson, Martin, MPMr Martin FergusonLS4BatmanALP00 asked the Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs, upon notice, on 29 March 2001:(1) What sum of funding does the Federation of Ethnic Communities Council receive from his Department.(2) Is the funding agreement of a three-year nature.(3) Has the organisation met its accountability requirements with his Department.(4) How many staff members are employed by the Federation of Ethnic Communities Council.(5) Given the suspension of membership of the Federation by Victoria and Western Australia, does the Federation properly represent all ethnic communities in Australia.(6) Has his attention been drawn to the recent resignation by the Federation's treasurer; if so, does he know the reasons for the resignation and do they include alleged mismanagement of funds and poor management of the Federation's affairs by the current executive.26813Ruddock, Philip, MPMr Ruddock0J4BerowraLPMinister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs and Minister for Reconciliation and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Affairs10—The answer to the honourable member's question is as follows:(1) $350,000 per year.(2) No.(3) Yes. Commonwealth funding to the Federation is based on acceptable outcomes against an agreed Work Plan. See also answer to part (5) below.(4) Four - two full-time and two part-time.(5) There is some concern about the Federation's ability to deliver fully representative advice to the government. However, the recently elected Chair of the Federation has a formal plan in place to address the perceived problems that have led to the suspensions.(6) Yes to all three parts.26813(Question No. 2492)249226813Horne, Bob, MPMr HorneUU5PatersonALP00 asked the Minister for Employment, Workplace Relations and Small Business, upon notice, on 2 April 2001:(1) What sum was spent on retraining those workers who lost their jobs when National Textiles closed in January 2000.(2) How many people completed a retraining program.(3) How many people obtained employment after completing a retraining program.26814Abbott, Tony, MPMr AbbottEZ5WarringahLPMinister for Employment, Workplace Relations and Small Business10—The answer to the honourable member's question is as follows:(1) $555,796 in funding has been approved for the retraining of former National Textiles employees.(2) 102 former National Textiles employees have completed approved training.(3) 90 former National Textiles employees have found employment (either full-time, part time or casual) since the commencement of the retraining programme.26814(Question No. 2498)249826814Ferguson, Martin, MPMr Martin FergusonLS4BatmanALP00 asked the Acting Minister for Finance and Administration, upon notice, on 3 April 2001:(1) What are the guidelines governing the sale of Essendon Airport.(2) Are there any restrictions on providing information to interested parties about the process of sale; if so, (a) what are the restrictions and (b) who determined them.(3) Are there any confidentially requirements placed on potential buyers; if so, what are the requirements.(4) Who determined the confidentiality requirements and are they standard.(5) Have the confidentiality requirements been used in any other airport sale.(6) Have any agencies or third parties been appointed to assist in the sale; if so, (a) what are the reporting requirements of such agencies or parties and (b) are they required to report to Parliament; if so, when.(7) What is the timetable for the sale.26814Costello, Peter, MPMr CostelloCT4HigginsLPTreasurer10—The answer to the honourable member's question is as follows:(1) The guidelines governing the sale of Essendon Airport Limited are consistent with previous airport sales. In particular, the guidelines provide for:- the continued operation of the airport as a general aviation airport;- the price offered within the context of the other objectives;- managerial and financial strength of the new Essendon Airport operator; and- fair and equitable treatment of employees of EAL.(2) Yes. (a) In line with standard processes, interested parties are provided with information about the process of the sale on entering into a confidentiality agreement. (b) The Office of Asset Sales and IT Outsourcing (OASITO) based on legal advice and in accordance with standard commercial practice.(3) Yes. All potential buyers are required to enter into formal confidentiality agreements with the Commonwealth.(4) OASITO, based on legal advice, determines the confidentiality requirements. These arrangements are consistent with standard commercial practice and previous sale processes.(5) Yes.(6) Yes. (a) Advisers appointed to the sale are required to report to OASITO. (b) No. OASITO continues to be accountable to the Parliament.(7) The sale process is expected to be completed by around mid 2001.26815(Question No. 2501)250126815Ripoll, Bernie, MPMr Ripoll83EOxleyALP00 asked the Minister for Defence, upon notice, on 3 April 2001:(1) Is 501 Wing RAAF Base Amberley being moved to RAAF Base Williamtown; if so, what are the details of timings and personnel changes involved at RAAF Base Amberley.(2) Is there a proposal to reduce the number of Air Commodores at RAAF Base Amberley from two to one.(3) What is the reason for the change in RAAF Base Amberley commanding officer structure.(4) What effect will a change in commanding officer structure at RAAF Base Amberley have on the operations of the base and its ability to liaise with the community and provide a public face to the operations of the base.26815Reith, Peter, MPMr ReithWI4FlindersLPMinister for Defence10—The answer to the honourable member's question is as follows:(1) No. However, deeper maintenance for F111 aircraft, which is undertaken by 501 Wing, has been a long planned market testing exercise. Outsourcing has its origin with the Force Structure Review and the rolling Commercial Support Program, which commenced in the early 1990s. Final implementation and transition of 501 Wing deeper maintenance to contractor support has undergone several delays but is expected to be completed by the end of 2001.(2) Yes. A study, which is reviewing the options for the amalgamation of Tactical Fighter Group and Strike Reconnaissance Group into a single Air Combat Group (ACG), is currently underway. It is most likely that the ACG headquarters would be located at RAAF Williamtown and would result in a reduction in the number of Air Commodores at RAAF Amberley. The study will present its findings later this year with a planned implementation of early 2002.(3) The creation of ACG would enable a more effective air combat (strike/fighter) capability to be achieved and other operational, support and logistics synergies to be realised. This will be particularly important for the new air combat capability to be delivered under Project AIR6000. As detailed in the White Paper, AIR6000 seeks to examine options for acquiring new combat aircraft to replace the F/A-18 and F-111. Although there is considerable effort required to refine the AIR6000 options, including whether a single aircraft type can meet both the strike and fighter roles, a solution which provides for both strike an fighter roles could result in increased combat effectiveness and significant savings. The formation of ACG will allow a range of options to be explored and doctrine to be established. This should ensure a seamless transition to the capability to be delivered by AIR6000.(4) Minimal impact to the base operations and community liaison is expected as a consequence of the proposed ACG reorganisation. RAAF Amberley base operations will not change under the ACG proposal. RAAF Amberley currently has two Air Commodores in residence, Commander Strike Reconnaissance Group (CDRSRG) and Commander Combat Support Group (CDRCSG). Headquarters Combat Support Group relocated to RAAF Amberley in 1999, raising the number of Air Commodores from one to two. Since that time, regional liaison responsibility has become a shared responsibility between CDRSRG and CDRCSG. CDRCSG's community liaison responsibilities are expected to be similar in scope to those of CDRSRG, prior to 1999.26815(Question No. 2502)250226815Ripoll, Bernie, MPMr Ripoll83EOxleyALP00 asked the Minister for Defence, upon notice, on 3 April 2001:(1) Prior to Government decisions based on the recent Defence White Paper, did Project Wedgetail Airborne Early Warning and Control (AEW&C) involve an agreement and understanding that Australia would purchase 7 Boeing 737s, 2 of which were to be assembled in Seattle, USA, as prototypes and the remaining 5 aircraft were to be assembled in Australia, in particular at RAAF Base Amberley.(2) Can he confirm the exact number and timing of the Boeing 737s to be assembled, the place of assembly and scope for change to any contractual agreement with Boeing in relation to the AEW&C project. (3) What commitment can he give in relation to his statement in letters to the editor of the Queensland Times on Saturday, 24 March 2001 that the number of aircraft can be varied and that no decision has to be made up to and including 2003.(4) If he is committed to the possibility of increasing the number of aircraft from 4 at present to any other number in the future, can he give details of the actual number and timing of delivery.(5) Are there contractual arrangements with Boeing to accommodate the assembly of AEW&C 737's in Australia should the Government decide to purchase 7 aircraft as originally indicated.(6) Is he aware of the impact reducing the number of AEW&C 737's purchased by Australia will have on the Australian Defence Industry; if so, how will he compensate the Australian Defence Industry for the loss of potential technology and employment development.(7) Will the downsizing of Project Wedgetail from 7 AEW&C aircraft reduce the capacity of the AEW&C system as a recognised defence strategy of Australia's national security.26816Reith, Peter, MPMr ReithWI4FlindersLPMinister for Defence10—The answer to the honourable member's question is as follows:(1) Prior to consideration in the context of the Defence 2000 White Paper, the Commonwealth issued in September 1998 a Request for Tender for the acquisition of six or seven AEW&C aircraft; the actual number being dependant on the overall cost remaining within approved Project funding. Based on tendered cost information, the Defence Capability Committee in March 2000 recommended the acquisition of six aircraft with an option for a seventh.There was never an agreement with Boeing to assemble 737 aircraft in Australia, nor any intention to have such an agreement. The intention was always to have all the 737 aircraft assembled on Boeing's 737 production line at their facility at Renton, Washington, USA.Boeing had, however, planned to install the AEW&C equipment into the first two of these 737 aircraft in the United States as prototypes, with the remaining aircraft having the equipment installed in Australia. The actual location at which these modifications were to be carried out was a commercial decision for Boeing; however, it was understood and expected this work would be done in a commercial facility at RAAF Base Amberley.(2) As stated earlier, all 737 aircraft will be assembled at the Boeing facility at Renton, Washington, USA as originally planned. However, with an order of only four aircraft, increased risk, schedule and overall cost related to transitioning the modification activities to Australia for only two aircraft was considered prohibitive, making it more prudent for all four aircraft to be completed in the United States.It is currently planned that Wedgetail 737 aircraft A30-01 will be assembled in April/May 2003; A30-02 in November/December 2004; A30-03 in August/September 2005 and A30-04 in April/May 2006.Where installation and checkout of mission system equipment will now occur is a commercial decision for Boeing, however, it is understood it will be carried out at the Boeing facility in Wichita, Kansas, USA.Should Australia purchase the additional AEW&C aircraft, there is scope for the Government to negotiate to have installation and checkout of the complex AEW&C mission systems in Australia at a location to be decided by Boeing, but most likely in a commercial facility at RAAF Base Amberley.(3) The Defence 2000 White Paper states the possibility of acquiring a further three AEW&C aircraft later in the decade.There is an option in the Commonwealth's contract with Boeing that will allow the purchase of these additional aircraft at the originally negotiated price until early 2003.After early 2003, additional AEW&C aircraft can still be purchased, but at a price to be negotiated based on the commercial price at the time.(4) The Defence 2000 White Paper states the possibility of acquiring a further three AEW&C aircraft later in the decade. That decision will be taken at the appropriate time. (5) There has never been a contractual arrangement to accommodate the assembly of 737 AEW&C aircraft in Australia. However, should the additional three AEW&C aircraft be acquired, there is scope within the contract to negotiate the installation and checkout of complex AEW&C mission systems in Australia at a location to be decided by Boeing, but most likely in a commercial facility at RAAF Base Amberley.(6) AEW&C Australian industry involvement has always focused on the important areas of technology, through life support and the associated jobs created over the 30 year life of the AEW&C aircraft rather than limited short term objectives. Installation of the AEW&C equipment into only two aircraft in Australia would not have added significantly to achievement of our goals for long-term in-country support.Work amounting to about $400 million will still be undertaken by Australian industry including the design and development of some radar, electronic warfare, communications and mission system elements.A Strategic Industry Development Activity program with a value in the order of $880 million is also in place and includes high technology activities such as training, skills transfer, collaborative ventures and research and development projects.(7) No. AEW&C aircraft are a very important part of Australia's Defence Strategy. The minimum number of AEW&C aircraft required to establish an effective capability is four, so this is the number the Government has initially ordered as part of the balanced force designed to achieve our National Security goal. The Defence 2000 White Paper also recognises that additional AEW&C aircraft would provide significant advantages provided that they are affordable when the remainder of our investment needs are considered. It is for this reason that the White Paper states the possibility of acquiring a further three aircraft later in the decade.26817(Question No. 2503)250326817Kerr, Duncan, MPMr KerrRH4DenisonALP00 asked the Minister representing the Minister for Justice and Customs, upon notice, on 3 April 2001:Have any buildings owned by the Australian Customs Service (ACS) been sold during 2000-2001; if so, will the Minister provide details of (a) the location of any buildings which have been sold, (b) any valuations of market value which were obtained prior to sale, (c) the sale price and (d) if the property was subsequently leased back by the ACS, the details of the subsequent lease agreement.26817Williams, Daryl, MPMr Williams7V5TangneyLPAttorney-General10—The Minister for Justice and Customs has provided the following answer to the honourable member's question:The Australian Customs Service (Customs) has not sold any commercial buildings during 2000-2001.During 2000-2001 Customs sold a residence at 12 Ryan Close, Brinsmead, Cairns, Queensland. The property was valued between $137,500 and $145,000 and was sold for $138,500. The property was not leased back by Customs.26817(Question No. 2508)250826817Morris, Allan, MPMr Allan MorrisFI4NewcastleALP00 asked the Minister representing the Minister for Communications, Information Technology and the Arts, upon notice, on 4 April 2001:(1) Is it a fact that (a) Telstra BigPond Internet access in Newcastle is priced at a higher rate than Sydney and (b) monthly-unlimited access costs $42.50 in Newcastle and $24.95 in Sydney.(2) Why does this price differential exist.(3) When will this impost on the Newcastle community end.(4) Does Telstra charge all regional Internet users in the same way.26818McGauran, Peter, MPMr McGauranXH4GippslandNPMinister for the Arts and the Centenary of Federation10—The Minister for Communications, Information Technology and the Arts has provided the following answer to the honourable member's question: (1) (a) and (b) Telstra advises the answer to the question is no. Telstra advises that the price of accessing Telstra BigPond in Newcastle is the same price as access in Sydney. There is no $42.50 unlimited Internet access plan provided by Telstra BigPond.(2) As the answer to question 1 is no, there can be no answer to question 2.(3) There is no additional impost on the Newcastle community in relation to Telstra's prices for access to the Internet.(4) Telstra advises that it charges regional Internet customers in the same way as capital city Internet customers.26818(Question No. 2518)251826818Danby, Michael, MPMr DanbyWF6Melbourne PortsALP00 asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade, upon notice, on 5 April 2001:(1) Has his attention been drawn to a report in the Bulletin on 3 April 2001 alleging that a derogatory reference to Indonesia had been made by the Minister for Employment, Workplace Relations and Small Business.(2) Has he discussed this matter with the Minister for Employment, Workplace Relations and Small Business.(3) Have there been any references in the Indonesian media to the comments made by the Minister for Employment, Workplace Relations and Small Business; if so, what were these references.26818Downer, Alexander, MPMr Downer4G4MayoLPMinister for Foreign Affairs10—The answer to the honourable member's question is as follows:I regard the questions as frivolous.26818(Question No. 2525)252526818Sciacca, Con, MPMr Sciacca6J4BowmanALP00 asked the Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs, upon notice, on 5 April 2001:(1) What communication facilities are made available to asylum seekers who have entered Australia without authorisation, while they are detained in immigration processing centres.(2) Are detainees in Australia's immigration processing centres permitted access to communication facilities; if not, what limits are placed on such access.26818Ruddock, Philip, MPMr Ruddock0J4BerowraLPMinister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs and Minister for Reconciliation and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Affairs10—The answer to the honourable member's question is as follows:(1) Telephones, fax machines, postal services, newspapers, televisions (cable and/or free to air), radios and video cassette recorders are available to unauthorised arrivals accommodated in Australia's immigration detention facilities. (2) All detainees in Australia's immigration detention facilities have access to the communication facilities I have just mentioned. However, some general access rules apply depending on whether the detainee is accommodated within the general population or is accommodated in separation detention as follows:General Detention · Telephone - user pay telephones for incoming and outgoing calls are available in each of the detention facilities. Depending on the location of the public telephone in the centre, access maybe restricted to prescribed hours, unless extenuating circumstances apply. · Fax machines - use is restricted to urgent immigration processing and related matters.· Television - no restriction.· Videos - no X-rated or R-rated material is made available for viewing, this can also extend to the M-rated classification. · Mail - unsolicited mail will be returned to the sender. No restriction on the sending and receiving of private mail.· Newspapers - no restriction to access newspapers subscribed to by the relevant detention centre.· Radio broadcasts - no restriction.Separation DetentionAll new arrivals at Immigration Reception and Processing Centres (IRPCs) - ie. Woomera, Port Hedland and Curtin - are placed in accommodation that is separate from the established detention population. This is known as separation detention. This is maintained throughout initial entry screening, health checking and establishment of identity. During the period of separation detention, access to communication facilities such as newspapers, radio or general television broadcasts is limited.Upon initial arrival at the centre, detainees are permitted to send a message to friends/relatives overseas to advise of their safe arrival and an address to which correspondence can be sent. They can receive correspondence from family overseas. Unsolicited mail is returned to the sender.In addition, if a detainee asks for a lawyer or for assistance to make an application for a visa, communication facilities are made available, through the on-site Department of Immigration and Multicultural Affairs office to contact appropriate service providers.During the period of separation detention access to videos is permitted. Classification restrictions apply as per the general detention population. 26819(Question No. 2526)252626819Sciacca, Con, MPMr Sciacca6J4BowmanALP00 asked the Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs, upon notice, on 5 April 2001:(1) How many employers have been issued with warnings by his Department since the introduction of the new warning scheme for employers found to be using illegal labour.(2) What is the industry profile of employers that have received warnings for employing Illegal Workers under the new scheme.26819Ruddock, Philip, MPMr Ruddock0J4BerowraLPMinister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs and Minister for Reconciliation and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Affairs10—The answer to the honourable member's question is as follows:(1) As at 6 April 2001, 20 employers had received Illegal Worker Warning Notices under the administrative warning notice regime that was introduced on 30 November 2000. A warning notice relates to an individual worker, and a total of 34 warning notices had been issued to these 20 employers as a result of their employing Illegal Workers.It should be noted that warning notices can only be issued to employers or labour suppliers where the illegal worker commenced work after 30 November 2000.(2) Table A below identifies the number of employers who received warning notices and the number of warning notices issued by industry.TABLE AILLEGAL WORKER WARNING NOTICES ISSUED AS AT 6 APRIL 2001 Industry TypeNo. of EmployersNo. of Warning Notices IssuedAgriculture, Forestry & Fishing27Manufacturing16Construction12Wholesale Trade11Retail Trade56Accommodation, Cafes & Restaurants45Cultural & Recreational Services11Personal & Other Services56Total2034Note: Industry classifications accord with the Australian and New Zealand Standard Industrial Classification (ANZSIC) codes.26820(Question No. 2528)252826820Theophanous, Dr Andrew, MPDr TheophanousQJ4CalwellIND00 asked the Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs, upon notice, on 5 April 2001:(1) When will he adopt the `Swedish Model' approach to detention of asylum seekers in Australia.(2) How many asylum seekers will be offered this option.(3) What will be the process of evaluation of potential recipients of this option.(4) What conditions will be offered to these recipients.(5) If not all available places are filled, will he offer the available positions to other asylum seekers.26820Ruddock, Philip, MPMr Ruddock0J4BerowraLPMinister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs and Minister for Reconciliation and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Affairs10—The answer to the honourable member's question is as follows:(1) I have studied the concept of the Swedish Model and I do not believe that it applies to our circumstances. I am considering a trial of alternative detention arrangements that may have elements of the Swedish Model; however, I am not considering the Swedish approach to immigration detention in total.(2) It is planned that up to 25 women and children will participate in the trial.(3) This issue is among those still being worked out by my Department. However, the proposed trial will only be open to women and children and will be approximately three months in length. Whether it will be a permanent arrangement will be determined by an evaluation of the trial, after that time.(4) Subject to satisfactory arrangements being agreed with the Woomera community, the participants will be located in community housing within Woomera town but under immigration detention. This is a trial of alternative detention arrangements not a release into the community.Consultations continue with Woomera residents on this and other issues.(5) All places in the trial will be filled on a voluntary basis. At this stage it is difficult to predict the response from the detainee population with regard to participation rates.