PhysicsLogic · Paper-first edition Lean-extracted article 023

Formal reconstruction · Quantum foundations

A Suggested Interpretation of the Quantum Theory in Terms of “Hidden” Variables

The logical anatomy of polar Schrödinger dynamics, added configuration guidance, effective collapse, equilibrium statistics, contextual observables, nonlocality, and deterministic completion

Formal object PhysicsLogic.Papers.Bohm1952
Main formal conclusion A wave-only description supplemented by actual configuration and deterministic guidance is complete and empirically equivalent in the selected atomic observable sector, while its departures and relativistic completion remain speculative
Argument architecture 10 routes · 42 semantic claims · 25 formal countermodels · 5 regimes · 2 original papers

Definitions, structures, and assumptions

Structures, classes, and inductive alternatives

  • inductive
  • structureThe repeated constraint selected by one guided-density route.
  • structureNeutral semantics for the two densities and their common guided evolution. The equality type is Lean equality on the paper-local density carrier.
  • structureThe repeated constraint paired with one typed paper-local derivation.
  • structurePaper-local meanings of the theory using the density model and of the physical ensemble represented by it.
  • structureProof-free semantics selected by one guided-density calculation. No field stores initial agreement, common evolution, uniqueness, or later agreement.
  • structureLater density agreement produced by the selected guided evolution.
  • structure
  • structure
  • structure
  • structure
  • structure
  • structure
  • inductive
  • inductive
  • inductive
  • structure
  • inductive
  • structure
  • structureA selected claim must depend on exactly these source-map steps.
  • structureA selected claim must retain exactly these epistemic statuses.
  • structureA selected route must name exactly these immediate predecessor routes.
  • structure
  • structure
  • inductive
  • structurePart II's separated apparatus packets, actual occupancy, and Born weights.
  • structurePart II's apparatus-dependent contexts evade a system-only value assignment.
  • structureThe original EPR position/momentum correlations and unchanged signal marginal.
  • structurePart I's actual configuration, phase-gradient momentum, and guided motion.
  • inductiveBohm's continuity-equation route to equilibrium preservation.
  • structureThe stationary `s`-state has zero particle motion but nonzero total energy.
  • structure
  • structure
  • structurePaper-local semantic vocabulary. The structure contains physical data and relations, never proofs of the paper's unresolved calculations.
  • structure
  • structure
  • structure
  • structure
  • structure
  • structure
  • structure
  • structure
  • structure
  • structure
  • structure
  • structure
  • structure
  • structureRelations needed to ask whether an indicated value reveals a value possessed by the system before the selected measurement run.
  • structurePhysical outcome support is meaningful without choosing whether a state is a complete ontic description.
  • structure
  • structure
  • structureA probability distribution assigned to a statistical population.
  • structureA theory- or model-indexed numerical prediction for an event.
  • structurePredictions made by descriptions in regimes. `predicts` is relational so the signature can represent deterministic values, sets of allowed values, or probabilistic outputs without choosing among them.
  • structure

Definitions and domain choices

  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definitionThe imported uniqueness or propagation calculation. Merely naming a common continuity equation does not make this implication automatic.
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definitionThe selected model retains all five physical indices and all three semantic families exactly. It supplies no density agreement or propagation result.
  • definition
  • definition
  • definitionThe exact proof-free model selected by this context.
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definitionThe unique model fixed by the context's five selected indices.
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definitionThe realized stopping point of the shared equivariance route, stated directly on one model. It retains initial agreement, the selected common guided evolution, and later agreement without letting the implication-valued propagation calculation become true merely because setup is absent.
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definitionImmediate predecessor routes. Claims established by their transitive predecessors are inherited by the dependency closure.
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definitionTemporary reductio-introduction steps discharged by this inference. Discharge removes only those exact origins from the conclusion's epistemic basis; it does not assert the temporary hypotheses globally.
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definitionA source-mapped claim holds when its declared formula evaluates under the given paper-local semantic interpretation.
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definitionEvery claim in the supplied identifier list holds.
  • definitionA source-mapped step is semantically sound when the interpreted premises imply the interpreted conclusion. Physical principles and imported calculations therefore remain explicit hypotheses of paper-specific certificates rather than acquiring truth from their source-map labels. A reductio hypothesis is different: it introduces a temporary assumption into a subargument and therefore is not required to hold globally. Its later uses remain ordinary premise-sensitive steps, and discharging it into a negated conclusion remains an ordinary semantic obligation.
  • definitionEvery step in the supplied identifier list is semantically sound.
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definitionThe formula declared for a claim identifier, when that claim is present.
  • definition
  • definitionEvery source-mapped step whose justification contributes to the claim through declared premise-to-conclusion steps.
  • definitionAll justification statuses contributed by the exact source-mapped origins of a claim. This records epistemic provenance; it does not assert any paper claim or discharge any physical assumption.
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definitionThe declared argument step with the requested identifier, when present.
  • definition
  • definitionThe premise list and conclusion attached to a declared step identifier.
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definitionThe complete Lean-side fidelity certificate. The first conjunct is computed from source-map data; the second is supplied by checked route semantics; the third requires each declared independence boundary to have a countermodel.
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definitionA typed countermodel matrix avoids string-keyed audit rows. Each index selects one proposition-valued separation obligation.
  • definition
  • definitionEvery route actually declared in the source map has a semantic certificate under the paper-local interpretation.
  • definition
  • definition
  • definitionOne countermodel row retains a weaker proposition while rejecting a stronger upgrade. This is a proposition, not a structure carrying proof fields.
  • definition
  • definition
  • definitionIndependent dependency and epistemic ledgers must review the same actual source claims, including every public conclusion and the selected paper conclusion. Empty, duplicated, nonexistent, or one-sided entries are invalid.
  • definitionEvery actually declared source route must have exactly one independently reviewed predecessor row. Correct rows for a selected subset are insufficient.
  • definitionThe declared main conclusion must be exposed by at least one public route output, rather than existing only as an unexported source-map claim.
  • definition
  • definition
  • definitionTwo finite lists describe the same dependency set. Duplicate expected entries are rejected so a ledger cannot pass by repeating a label.
  • definitionEvery paper-level, claim-level, and step-level source reference is present and has a nonempty work and locator. PaperArgument.auditable separately checks that every claim and step carries at least one source.
  • definitionA source reference is usable for review only when both the work and its locator are nonempty.
  • definitionStatic fidelity checks that can be evaluated from a paper's source map alone. They do not assert the truth of any physical premise.
  • definitionEvery declared output of a named source route holds under the semantic interpretation. This is the proof obligation discharged by paper-specific Lean theorems.
  • definition
  • definitionA route is fully certified only when both its individual steps and its declared outputs are semantically checked.
  • definitionEvery source-mapped inference step in a named route is semantically sound.
  • definitionEvery route named in the supplied identifier list is semantically certified.
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definitionThe source-mapped route with the requested identifier, when present.
  • definition
  • definitionThe public semantic interface inherited from predecessor routes. Descendants receive only declared route outputs, not every internal intermediate claim. Outputs still carrying a temporary reductio origin are excluded.
  • definitionAll direct and inherited route dependencies. The route-order check separately ensures that the declared graph is acyclic and topologically ordered.
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definitionA differentiable phase with continuous but non-Lipschitz guidance at zero.
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definitionA uniform spatial Lipschitz bound on the selected time interval and chart.
  • definitionThe coordinate decoder is required only along the actual history.
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definitionThe analytic flow input is distinct from common pushforward transport.
  • definitionActual initial configurations follow the very current used by the Born law.
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definitionEquations (5) and (7) identify the two continuity evolutions.
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definitionRegular coordinate realization of the same selected wave, amplitude and phase. No continuity equation or Born-current conclusion is assumed here.
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definitionThe real parameter is the same clock used by the polar fields and endpoint map.
  • definition
  • definitionEvery selected-state successor represents an admissible solution, and every such solution is represented.
  • definitionThe guidance postulate transports an ensemble density by the particle-current continuity equation. This is distinct from the wave-density equation obtained from polar decomposition.
  • definition
  • definitionPart I p. 171: the actual initial ensemble law equals the initial Born law.
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definitionPart I, equations (1)-(8): the polar decomposition of a Schrödinger solution produces a continuity equation and a Hamilton-Jacobi-like equation containing the quantum potential. This is a mathematical calculation, not yet the postulate that a particle occupies an actual configuration.
  • definition
  • definitionPhysical Review 85 (1952), p. 170, equations (5), (6), and the `R` form of equation (8). Bohm first writes `P = R^2`, identifies the probability-current components as `P grad S / m`, obtains the continuity equation, rewrites the Hamilton-Jacobi equation with the quantum potential, and gives `U = -(hbar^2 / 2m) (nabla^2 R / R)`. Derivatives, currents and the amplitude Laplacian are computed from actual coordinate fields. The open regular polar chart and its physical-coordinate calibration are explicit, with no extension through wave-function nodes.
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definitionApparatus occupancy refers to the apparatus's own hidden configuration.
  • definitionRecorded momentum is contextual and need not equal actual initial momentum.
  • definitionThe EPR argument combines its printed correlations with no-signalling.
  • definitionThe selected actual momentum and configuration obey the printed guidance law.
  • definitionThe stationary example retains its selected momentum and force balance.
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definitionRaw Part I source chain. It contains neither an assembled equivariance setup nor any shared endpoint or explanation.
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definitionContinuity of the selected physical coordinate history, not an assigned predicate.
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definitionA smooth stationary wave with a nodal plane; no global normalization is claimed.
  • definitionA local Born-current result. It does not assert total probability one.
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definitionOne forward continuation exists and every continuation from the same selected state and time is that continuation. This is nonvacuous, unlike uniqueness alone.
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definitionA completion whose deterministic dynamics governs an actual system.
  • definitionUniversal completion clauses, possibly vacuous over physical systems.
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definitionSubstantive descriptive completeness: the selected regime contains at least one physically admissible element, and the description represents every such element. The coverage law alone may hold vacuously on an empty domain.
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definitionA concrete mathematical assignment whose state, quantity, and value all have the selected representation relations. This proposition deliberately stops before asserting that the physical quantity possesses the represented value.
  • definition
  • definitionActive unfaithfulness is a complete represented assignment whose represented physical value is absent from the physical state. It is stronger than merely negating `FaithfullyRepresentsAt`, which can also fail for lack of any value- bearing representation instance.
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definitionActive unfaithfulness is witnessed by a recorded value absent from the premeasurement state, rather than by the mere absence of a faithful run.
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definitionForget a supplied completeness classification without replacing it by false.
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definitionA selected observable sector.
  • definitionTwo descriptions share at least one prediction in the selected sector.
  • definitionEmpirical equivalence combines exact predictive agreement with a concrete observable and value predicted by both descriptions. The witness prevents an empty sector or two predictionless descriptions from establishing empirical equivalence.
  • definitionExtensional agreement of two prediction relations on a selected sector. This low-level relation may hold vacuously when the sector or both prediction relations are empty; `EmpiricallyEquivalent` adds a common prediction.
  • definition
  • definition
  • definitionA model-to-world interpretation law. It does not assert that the model has produced a conclusion; use `GroundedModelConclusionAt` for that.
  • definitionA model-to-theory interpretation law. It does not assert that the model has produced a conclusion; use `GroundedModelConclusionAt` for that.
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definitionBuild the epistemic dependency basis in paper order. A conclusion inherits the justification origin of its own step and every origin already attached to its premises.
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definitionExpand a set of route identifiers by one dependency edge, iterated with enough fuel to traverse any acyclic graph on the declared routes.
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition

Selected instances and coercions

  • instance
  • instance
  • instance
  • instance
  • instance
  • instance
  • instance
  • instance
  • instance
  • instance
  • instance
  • instance
  • instance
  • instance
  • instance
  • instance
  • instance
  • instance
  • instance
  • instance
  • instance
  • instance
  • instance
  • instance

Source mappings and interpretation choices

  • inductive
  • definition
  • instance
  • definition
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • definition
  • definition
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • recursor
  • definition
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • definition
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • inductive
  • definition
  • instance
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • definition
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • definition
  • definition
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • recursor
  • definition
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • definition
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • inductive
  • definition
  • instance
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • definition
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • definition
  • definition
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • recursor
  • definition
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • definition
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • instance
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • instance
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • definition
  • definition
  • inductive
  • definition
  • instance
  • definition
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • recursor
  • definition
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • definition
  • inductive
  • definition
  • instance
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • definition
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • recursor
  • definition
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • definition
  • structure
  • definition
  • instance
  • checked statement
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • recursor
  • definition
  • checked statement**Alias** of `PhysicsLogic.Papers.Bohm1952.SemanticContext.all_routes_are_semantically_realizable`.
  • checked statement
  • inductive
  • definition
  • instance
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • recursor
  • definition
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • constructor
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • definition
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • definition
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • instance
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • instance
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • instance
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • instance
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • instance
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • instance
  • definition
  • definition
  • instance
  • definition
  • definition
  • instance
  • definition
  • definition
  • instance
  • definition
  • definition
  • instance
  • definition
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • definition
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • definition
  • definition
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement

Checked statements: parameters, hypotheses, and interpretation

  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statementPart I p. 171 reaches the model-native stopping point: the selected ensemble starts with the wave density, both densities follow the selected common flow, and the later density agreement is retained. This does not add the separate Part II relaxation expectation.
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement
  • checked statement

Axioms and trust boundaries

  • axiom / trust boundary
  • axiom / trust boundary
  • axiom / trust boundary
  • axiom / trust boundary
  • axiom / trust boundary
  • axiom / trust boundary
  • axiom / trust boundary
  • axiom / trust boundary
  • axiom / trust boundary

Constructors, projections, and other meaning dependencies

  • constructor
  • constructor
  • constructor
  • constructor
  • constructor
  • constructor
  • constructor
  • recursor
  • constructor
  • constructor
  • constructor
  • constructor
  • constructor
  • constructor
  • constructor
  • constructor
  • constructor
  • constructor
  • constructor
  • constructor
  • constructor
  • constructor
  • constructor
  • constructor
  • constructor
  • constructor
  • recursor
  • constructor
  • constructor
  • constructor
  • constructor
  • constructor
  • constructor
  • constructor
  • constructor
  • constructor
  • recursor
  • constructor
  • constructor
  • constructor
  • constructor
  • constructor
  • constructor
  • constructor
  • constructor
  • constructor
  • recursor
  • constructor
  • constructor
  • constructor
  • recursor
  • constructor
  • constructor
  • constructor
  • constructor
  • constructor
  • constructor
  • constructor
  • constructor
  • constructor
  • constructor
  • constructor
  • constructor
  • recursor
  • constructor
  • constructor
  • constructor
  • constructor
  • constructor
  • constructor
  • constructor
  • constructor
  • constructor
  • constructor
  • constructor
  • constructor
  • recursor
  • constructor
  • recursor
  • constructor
  • recursor
  • constructor
  • recursor
  • recursor
  • constructor
  • constructor
  • recursor
  • constructor
  • recursor
  • constructor
  • recursor
  • constructor
  • recursor
  • constructor
  • recursor
  • constructor
  • recursor
  • constructor
  • recursor
  • constructor
  • recursor
  • constructor
  • recursor
  • constructor
  • recursor
  • constructor
  • recursor
  • constructor
  • recursor
  • constructor
  • constructor
  • constructor
  • constructor
  • constructor
  • constructor
  • constructor
  • constructor
  • constructor
  • constructor
  • constructor
  • constructor
  • constructor

External mathematical declarations

  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary
  • external type boundary

Every physical statement, dependency, equation-level paraphrase, and epistemic qualifier in this edition is taken only from Bohm1952.lean, SourceMap.lean, and Coverage.lean. The article keeps mathematical consequences of the Schrödinger equation separate from Bohm’s added physical postulates, exactly as the Lean architecture does. Its named calculation contracts are independent hypotheses; only their result steps apply the selected local inputs to obtain conclusions. Those steps reconstruct their physics from checked premise maps; they do not extract witnesses from completed route certificates.

01

The two papers are a network of independent calculations around one added ontology

The polar Schrödinger route provides a continuity equation and modified Hamilton–Jacobi equation. The guidance route adds actual configuration and deterministic dynamics. The other paper-local calculations record one-particle examples, many-body transitions, apparatus packets, equilibrium statistics, contextual observables, EPR analysis, and the radiation field without claiming that page order has already supplied their premises. Only the final completion assessment inherits the certified deterministic-motion output of the guidance route, and its completion step reconstructs that proposition from the checked premise map before extracting forward determinism. The formalization never treats the continuity equation as if it had already postulated a particle.

Independent: polar Schrödinger reduction ψ = R exp(iS/ℏ) · typed p. 170 continuity/Hamilton–Jacobi bundle · quantum potential
Independent: examples and many-body transitions stationary state · two slits · configuration-space nonlocality · quantized packets
Independent: measurement and context occupied apparatus packet · effective collapse · contextual momentum observable
Independent: equilibrium, EPR, and radiation field |ψ|² equivariance · influence without signal · field-mode configuration
Independent: added configuration dynamics actual position · p = ∇S · quantum force · deterministic continuous trajectory
Only inherited route: supplemented completion and qualified scope deterministic individual outcome · standard statistics · atomic-regime equivalence · speculative extensions
Figure 1. The ten source-mapped routes. The principal source-map conclusion is the supplemented completion, which consumes only the certified guidance output. The other nine certified routes, including the one-particle and radiation examples, remain independent paper-local arguments rather than inherited premises.
Epistemic ledger
TransitionStatusRetained qualification
Polar Schrödinger decompositionmathematical paper derivationIt supplies equations, not an actual configuration.
Configuration and guidanceadded physical postulatesThe ontology and guidance law are not derived from continuity.
Trajectory existence/uniquenessimported resultIntegration of the guidance field is an explicit calculation input.
Packet, contextual, and EPR conclusionscalculation + interpretationEach retains its apparatus, branch, equilibrium, and configuration-space premises.
Equilibrium relaxationauthor expectationEquivariance is proved locally; arbitrary relaxation is not.
Radiation-field calculationdeferred calculationThe field-mode output is supplied as a named hypothesis.
Completion and empirical scopeinterpretive conclusionAdded postulates, sector-relative equivalence, and open extensions remain visible.
02

The Schrödinger equation supplies a flow; Bohm separately postulates what flows

The mathematical setup assumes a one-particle wave obeying the Schrödinger equation in the atomic regime, a polar decomposition into selected amplitude and phase, and the identity of the selected density with the wave density.

P = R²,
∂tP + div(P∇S/m) = 0,
∂tS + |∇S|²/(2m) + V + U = 0,
U = −(ℏ²/2m)(∇²R/R). the typed bundle uses actual coordinate derivatives, currents and amplitude Laplacians on an open, nonempty polar region with R ≠ 0; chart calibration, regularity and the same-wave polar representation remain explicit inputs (1)
Polar-decomposition theoremLean checked

The setup and supplied separation calculation yield the quantum-potential identity, modified Hamilton–Jacobi equation, wave-density continuity equation, and PrintedPolarReductionFormulaBundle. The formula is projected by polar_decomposition_calculation_retains_printed_equations_five_six_and_eight before the result consumes it; named_polar_reduction_does_not_supply_printed_equations blocks a name-only replacement.

schrodinger_polar_decomposition_yields_continuity_and_quantum_hamilton_jacobi · Part I p. 170, equations (1)–(8)

Added configuration and guidance

The second route begins with a genuinely new source-level physical premise: the electron has an actual configuration at the initial time; its momentum obeys p = ∇S and its velocity is v = ∇S/m; the quantum potential acts on the electron at its configuration; and the complete state is the selected wave together with that configuration.

actual configuration q(t₀),   p(q)=∇S(q),   v(q)=∇S(q)/m,   Q acts at q,   complete state = (ψ,q). the source map explicitly records p = grad S and v = grad S/m; these are added postulates (2)

The calculation supplies an actual phase-gradient initial-value solution, a uniform spatial Lipschitz bound on the selected interval, and calibrated clock and state representation. Coordinate continuity and uniqueness among all admissible trajectories are derived. The successor state decodes to the configuration of the same guidance map used by probability transport. Universal forward determinism is a separate explicit premise, not inferred from this interval result.

The distinction is substantive: the differentiable phase with gradient 2 sqrt(|q|) admits q=0 and q=t^2 from the same initial position on [0,1], but its velocity fails the Lipschitz condition. This control does not assert the full Schrodinger/polar equations. Likewise, the encoding q to q^2 can have a unique encoded successor while erasing the sign of the physical configuration; the required state decoder excludes that identification.

trajectory_inputs_determine_the_actual_state · lipschitz_guidance_has_one_actual_history · certified_guidance_route_retains_actual_selected_trajectory
Neutral descriptive transitionwitnessed incompleteness + nonvacuous completeness

The admissible configuration element absent from the wave-only representation witnesses incompleteness. The supplemented description separately covers an inhabited admissible domain, and the generic descriptive-completeness theorem therefore excludes completeness of the wave-only description in the atomic regime. No determinism or empirical equivalence is used in this conclusion.

completion_setup_realizes_descriptive_completeness_transition · Part I pp. 166–169
Deterministic continuous-motion theoremLean checked from added postulates

Configuration/guidance postulates plus the supplied trajectory calculation establish a forward-deterministic continuous trajectory and retain the mass-normalized source guidance law.

added_configuration_guidance_and_uniqueness_yield_deterministic_continuous_motion · guidance_postulates_retain_printed_phase_gradient_and_mass · Part I pp. 166, 170–171

The ontology is not hidden in the algebra

continuity_equation_does_not_supply_an_actual_configuration is the formal boundary: a density continuity equation can be derived while the assertion of an actual configuration remains absent.

03

Stationary energy and two-slit interference separate particle motion from wave effects

Real stationary spatial wave

For the selected stationary state with a real spatial wave, the supplied calculation sets the particle momentum to zero and the particle at rest. Its particle kinetic energy vanishes and the classical and quantum forces balance. A nonzero total energy need not be particle motion; stationarity does not fix the sign or zero of that energy.

real stationary wave  ⇒  ∇S = 0,  p = 0,  v = 0,  Ekinetic = 0,  Etotal = V + Q,  Fclassical + Fquantum = 0. stationary-state calculation in the encoded atomic regime; positive energy requires a separate sign premise (3)

A normalized stationary-wave test

hbar=m=1; V(x)=x^2/2.
A(x)=sqrt(1/sqrt(pi))*exp(-x^2/2); psi_t(x)=A(x)*exp(-i*t/2).
i*d_t psi=-(1/2)*d_xx psi+V*psi; nu_t=N(0,1/2).
v=Im(d_x psi/psi)=0; E=-d_t phase=1/2.
Q=-A''/(2*A)=(1-x^2)/2; -V'-Q'=0. The same actual wave supplies the Born law, derivatives, guidance, energy, and quantum potential. At x=0, Q=1/2 is nonzero. This is a constructed control, not an extra calculation attributed to Bohm. (3a)
the_actual_wave_is_an_energy_eigenstate · the_quantum_potential_uses_the_same_actual_wave_amplitude · the_actual_classical_and_quantum_forces_balance
V_C(x)=V(x)+C; psi_C(t,x)=exp(-i*C*t)*psi_t(x).
nu_C(t)=nu_t; v_C(t,x)=0; E_C(t)=E(t)+C.
C=-1 gives E_C=-1/2 with normalized stationary rest. The shifted wave solves the actual shifted Schrodinger equation. This is the constant-potential freedom of the nonrelativistic fixed-particle model, not a claim about gravitational vacuum energy. (3b)
normalized_stationary_rest_does_not_require_positive_total_energy · stationary_example_retains_zero_velocity_and_kinetic_energy

Two-slit wave and actual passage

In the two-slit setup the electron has an actual configuration. The calculation gives it a definite slit passage but denies that this passage is predictable. Meanwhile the wave produces the interference pattern and mediates dependence on the slit arrangement.

definite actual slit passage + unpredictable branch + wave-mediated slit dependence  ⇒  interference pattern. definite trajectory and interference coexist without making the path predictable (4)
One-particle examples theoremLean checked

The two supplied calculations jointly establish the stationary energy/force balance and interference conclusions without mistaking nonzero energy for particle motion.

stationary_and_two_slit_examples_separate_actual_motion_from_wave_effects · stationary_example_retains_zero_velocity_and_kinetic_energy · Part I pp. 173–174
04

Configuration-space dynamics supplies nonlocal dependence and selects one quantized transition packet

The many-body setup contains a configuration-space wave and its guidance relation. Its calculation says that local motion depends on remote configuration and that the wave mediates an effective many-body interaction.

many-body ψ(q₁,…,qN)  ⇒  motion of one coordinate depends on the remote configuration  ⇒  effective many-body interaction. configuration-space dependence, not a local single-particle wave account (5)

A second subroute starts with an interacting wave whose asymptotic packets separate, an actual configuration occupying one selected branch, and a correlation between that branch and an outcome. The calculation gives quantized transfer in the selected branch, makes the unoccupied branches dynamically irrelevant, and equates the ensemble probability of the selected outcome with its wave weight.

separated packets + actual occupied branch  ⇒  definite correlated quantized transfer,
Pensemble(outcome) = weightψ(outcome). standard transition probability retained alongside definite branch occupancy (6)
Many-body transition theoremLean checked

The configuration-space and transition-packet calculations establish nonlocal dependence, effective interaction, selected quantized transfer, branch irrelevance, and the standard weight equality.

configuration_space_dynamics_and_packet_selection_explain_correlated_quantized_transitions · Part I pp. 174–177
05

Nonoverlapping apparatus packets yield effective collapse without fundamental wave collapse

The measurement interaction correlates branches of the wave with apparatus packets. Those packets do not overlap, exactly one actual apparatus configuration lies in one selected branch, and that branch correlates with a definite outcome while both wave branches retain their nonzero squared-coefficient probabilities.

nonoverlapping apparatus packets + actual configuration in branch b  ⇒  definite record and effective wave = b,
unoccupied branches dynamically irrelevant,   no fundamental collapse,
one actual outcome; Pleft = |cleft|²,  Pright = |cright|². both Born weights can remain nonzero without ontically multiple outcomes (7)
Effective-collapse theoremLean checked

The apparatus-packet setup and calculation establish one actual occupied outcome, both explicit Born weights, definite record, occupied effective wave, unoccupied-branch irrelevance, and absence of fundamental collapse.

nonoverlapping_apparatus_packets_and_actual_configuration_yield_effective_collapse · apparatus_measurement_retains_one_actual_outcome_and_born_weights · Part II pp. 181–182, equations (8)–(11)

Effective is not fundamental

The countermodel effective_branch_selection_does_not_require_fundamental_collapse records exactly this distinction. Branch separation and actual occupancy can make one packet effective while the total wave does not undergo a fundamental collapse.

06

Equivariance preserves quantum equilibrium; it does not prove arbitrary relaxation into it

The equilibrium setup assumes equality of the initial ensemble and Born measures. The calculation supplies their common configuration transport and the state/density regularity; it no longer supplies the desired later equality. The shared theorem derives that equality.

ρ(t₀)=|ψ(t₀)|² + common guided continuity flow  ⇒  ρ(t)=|ψ(t)|². equivariance: preservation of equilibrium once assumed (8)
For measurable events A: nu_t(A)=integral_A |psi_t(q)|^2 d lambda(q).
nu_t=(Phi_s,t)_*nu_s; mu_t=(Phi_s,t)_*mu_s.
mu_s=nu_s implies mu_t=nu_t, with normalized laws at both times. The initial wave is square-integrable and its Born law normalized; the later wave is a.e. strongly measurable. The flow map is a.e. measurable under both initial laws. The nonvacuous result also requires s!=t and an initial event with probability strictly between zero and one. (8a)

The source ensemble-density representative is nonnegative and a.e. measurable. The original wave-density readout is calibrated to the squared complex wave at both endpoints. Common transport preserves probability normalization; later measurability then gives square integrability. Constructing this transport from the source continuity and guidance equations remains an explicit analytic input.

the_actual_guided_ensemble_realizes_nonvacuous_born_equivariance · actual_configuration_transport_derives_later_density_agreement · actual_equivariance_retains_the_source_density_calibration

The same transport map must also solve the phase-gradient guidance equation on a nonzero real-time interval, for almost every initial Born configuration. Its initial value, coordinate decoder, and clock are calibrated to the physical configuration and source fields. Positive density on the regular node-free chart then identifies each actual trajectory derivative with j/rho. Initial ensemble agreement transfers this almost-everywhere statement to the actual ensemble; the certified equilibrium conclusion retains it.

Endpoint pushforwards alone are insufficient: the path q(t)=q(0)+t(1-t) returns every configuration at t=1 and preserves a normalized stationary Gaussian at the endpoints, but violates zero phase-gradient guidance in between. An independent normalized moving Gaussian tests actual phase-derived motion and transport; it is a kinematic test, not an asserted free Schrodinger solution. Existence, uniqueness, global node avoidance, and the analytic derivation of measure transport from continuity remain separate obligations.

actual_equivariance_uses_the_phase_gradient_guidance_flow · certified_equilibrium_route_retains_actual_guidance · correct_born_pushforwards_do_not_establish_guidance

This route is also adapted to the shared guided-density framework. The local setup and calculation establish the direct nonvacuous proposition requiring initial agreement, common evolution, and later agreement together. That direct output reconstructs every shared equivariance claim. The adapter grounds only the selected pre-output setup in a framework-as-theory and an explicit world record; it does not assume the propagation calculation or later agreement.

bohm_route_realizes_shared_guided_density_equivariance · bohm_route_exhibits_nonvacuous_shared_guided_density_equivariance · grounded_bohm_equivariance_transfers_every_shared_claim

bohm_source_inputs_establish_equivariance_setup_and_calculation derives the setup from polar continuity, guidance, ensemble continuity, and their common-flow calculation. bohm_source_inputs_make_shared_equivariance_route_applicable then enters the shared route. The conclusions bohm_source_inputs_realize_structural_guided_density_equivariance_explanation and bohm_source_inputs_realize_source_structural_guided_density_equivariance_explanation distinguish the mechanism-neutral explanation from the one retaining Bohm's typed derivation.

Relaxation remains an expectation

A separate assessment says relaxation toward wave density is expected but explicitly denies that a detailed proof has been supplied. The qualified theorem conjoins this expectation with the proved preservation result; it does not infer relaxation from equivariance.

Equilibrium and relaxation theorempreservation proved; relaxation expected

The common-flow calculation preserves the equilibrium density, while the author assessment keeps general relaxation plausible but unproved.

equilibrium_is_preserved_while_general_relaxation_remains_an_expectation · Part I p. 171; Part II pp. 185–186, with the explicit proof disclaimer on p. 186

Preservation is not convergence

The actual stationary oscillator preserves its Born ensemble, while a displaced Gaussian follows the same zero-velocity flow without ever acquiring exact Born equilibrium. The earlier scalar history remains a formula-level illustration; the fidelity boundary now uses actual normalized waves, dynamics, and probability measures.

With common transport and a measurable embedding Phi_s,t:
mu_t=nu_t if and only if mu_s=nu_s.
In the stationary control, nu_t=N(0,1/2), mu_t=N(1,1/2), and Phi_s,t=id. This excludes finite-time exact fine-grained equilibration in the selected flow. It does not rule out weak, asymptotic, or coarse-grained relaxation, modified dynamics, or Bohm's proposed chaotic macroscopic mechanism. Forward equivariance does not assume a global inverse through nodes. (8b)
the_actual_displaced_ensemble_never_reaches_exact_born_equilibrium
07

Measured observables are apparatus-contextual, while EPR influence is nonlocal but nonsignalling in equilibrium

A standard momentum measurement need not reveal prior momentum

In the selected run, the standard procedure produces a record indicating a measured value for the momentum quantity. The calculation nevertheless assigns a different actual premeasurement momentum value, denies that the measured value was the premeasurement value, says the procedure transforms the wave, and makes the apparatus context affect the outcome. Position and momentum apparatuses also carry distinct hidden configurations and distinct context-dependent hidden-variable distributions.

pactual, before ≠ precorded,    standard procedure transforms ψ,    apparatus context affects outcome,
ρposition apparatus ≠ ρmomentum apparatus. therefore this indicated run actively misreports the premeasurement particle momentum (9)
Contextual-momentum theoremmeasurement interpretation

The measurement run and supplied calculation establish the actual value, its mismatch with the record, a positive witness of active unfaithfulness, wave transformation, and apparatus dependence. The conclusion cannot hold merely because no run occurred.

standard_momentum_observable_need_not_reveal_premeasurement_particle_momentum · contextual_measurement_retains_distinct_apparatus_distributions · Part II pp. 183–184

EPR-correlated configuration-space wave

The EPR setup is both correlated and many-body in configuration space, retaining x₁ − x₂ = a and p₁ + p₂ = 0. The calculation says a distant measurement choice changes conditional motion and transmits an instantaneous configuration-space influence. In quantum equilibrium it simultaneously denies a controllable signal and retains the standard relativistically consistent predictions.

distant choice  ⇒  instantaneous configuration-space influence,
x₁ − x₂ = a, p₁ + p₂ = 0,  remote momentum changes,
quantum equilibrium  ⇒  unchanged remote operational marginal + no controllable signal. nonlocal influence and operational no-signalling are distinct claims (10)
EPR nonlocality theoremconfiguration-space interpretation

The EPR setup and calculation establish distant conditional change, instantaneous influence, absence of an equilibrium signal, and relativistic consistency of standard predictions.

epr_route_is_nonlocal_but_not_a_controllable_signal_in_quantum_equilibrium · epr_analysis_retains_equal_marginal_and_remote_motion_change · Part II pp. 186–187

The countermodel instantaneous_configuration_influence_does_not_itself_supply_a_signal prevents the first half of this conjunction from being substituted for the second.

08

Actual field-mode configurations extend packet selection to radiation quanta

Appendix A supplies a radiation mode with an actual configuration and a radiation super-wave functional. The field calculation is explicitly classified as deferred in the source map.

actual field-mode configuration + super-wave functional  ⇒  field quantum potential,
separated photoelectric and Compton packets  ⇒  quantized energy transfer + standard probabilities. the exact Appendix A calculation is a supplied proposition-valued input (11)
Radiation-quantum theoremdeferred calculation input

The field setup and supplied calculation establish quantum-potential modification, packet separation, quantized transfer, and standard photoelectric and Compton probabilities.

field_configuration_and_superwave_extend_packet_logic_to_radiation_quanta · Part II Appendix A, pp. 189–191
09

The completion is deterministic at the individual level and probabilistic at the predictive and ensemble levels

The completion setup selects an observable sector. It states that actual configuration is physically admissible but absent from the wave-only representation, that a configuration supplement extends the wave-only description to a completed description, that the result is complete in the atomic regime, that the selected dynamics governs physical systems, that the selected electron is an actual physical system, and that the completed and wave-only descriptions are empirically equivalent in the selected sector.

Supplemented deterministic completionadded ontology + empirical equivalence

The completion setup and forward determinism establish a configuration-supplemented, complete, deterministic, empirically equivalent description whose dynamics governs the selected physical electron. The corresponding universal law alone is kept distinct because it can hold over an empty physical-system scope.

paper_realizes_supplemented_deterministic_completion · Part I p. 166; Part II pp. 180, 188

Predictive branching without ontic branching

The wave-only description gives positive weight to two distinct outcomes. A separate determinacy premise says every physically possible outcome of the actual state equals the selected outcome. Lean then proves that the description branches predictively while the physical state does not branch ontically.

multiple positive predictive weights + one determinate physically possible outcome  ⇒  predictive branching but no ontic branching. probability does not imply fundamental individual indeterminacy in the encoded completion (12)

With standard statistics and agreement between ensemble probability and wave weight, a further theorem keeps three roles distinct: predictive probability, ensemble probability, and ontic possibility. The first two may share the same numerical weight while the third remains unbranched.

probabilistic_predictions_coexist_with_a_determinate_individual_outcome · standard_statistics_and_hidden_configuration_keep_probability_roles_distinct

Qualified empirical and extension scope

The paper scope says standard quantum theory applies in the atomic regime and the interpretations are not experimentally distinguishable there. A short-distance modification is proposed but not established, and no relativistic completion is supplied in the encoded short-distance regime. Thus empirical equivalence is local to the domain where current quantum theory applies; proposed departures remain speculative.

Qualified empirical-scope theoremshort-distance and relativistic obligations open

The scope assessment is projected unchanged into the five-part qualified conclusion.

empirical_equivalence_is_atomic_regime_scoped_and_short_distance_extensions_remain_speculative · Part I p. 179; Part II pp. 187–188
Reader aids and formal audit
A

Concept guide

Terms linked throughout the article resolve to these paper-local definitions and conclusions.

Polar Schrödinger reduction

The amplitude–phase decomposition yielding a typed p. 170 regular-region bundle for P = R², current continuity, the quantum-potential-modified Hamilton–Jacobi equation, and U = −(ℏ²/2m)(∇²R/R).

PolarDecompositionCalculation

Configuration guidance

The added actual configuration, phase momentum, quantum-potential action, and complete wave-plus-configuration state.

ConfigurationGuidancePostulates

Deterministic continuous motion

Actual guidance trajectories and decoded physical successor states, with interval uniqueness derived from an explicit Lipschitz condition and universal determinism kept as a separate premise.

TrajectoryExistenceUniquenessCalculation

Quantum potential

The amplitude-defined additional potential in the Hamilton–Jacobi equation, asserted to act on the actual configuration.

quantumPotentialIdentity

Configuration-space nonlocality

Dependence of local motion on remote coordinates through the many-body configuration-space wave.

ManyBodyCalculation

Packet selection

Actual configuration occupies one separated branch, making unoccupied branches dynamically irrelevant for the selected outcome.

TransitionPacketCalculation

Effective collapse

A definite occupied apparatus packet and effective wave without fundamental collapse of the total wave.

MeasurementPacketCalculation

Guided-density equivariance

Preservation of equality between ensemble density and wave density when both follow the same guided continuity flow.

EquivarianceCalculation

Relaxation expectation

The expectation that nonequilibrium approaches wave density, paired with the explicit absence of a detailed proof.

RelaxationAssessment

Contextual observable

An actual indicated measurement outcome shaped by wave transformation and apparatus context, together with a complete mathematical state, quantity, assignment, and value representation whose physical value is witnessed to be absent from the premeasurement particle quantity.

ContextualObservableCalculation

EPR influence without signal

Instantaneous configuration-space influence with no controllable signal in quantum equilibrium.

EPRCalculation

Radiation-field extension

Actual field-mode configuration and super-wave packet logic for quantized photoelectric and Compton transfers.

RadiationFieldCalculation

Supplemented completion

A configuration-extended deterministic description complete and empirically equivalent in a selected atomic observable sector.

CompletionSetup

Distinct probability roles

Numerically aligned predictive and ensemble probabilities alongside one determinate, nonbranching physical outcome.

DistinctProbabilityRoleResult

Qualified empirical scope

Atomic-regime equivalence with unestablished short-distance modification and no supplied relativistic completion.

PaperScopeAssessment
B

Route inventory and formal provenance

The source map declares ten routes and forty-one semantic atoms. Coverage interprets every atom and provides a realization theorem for every route from twenty-seven raw paper-local inputs rather than assumed route certificates.

Complete route inventory
RouteDeclared dependenciesPrincipal outputProfile
Schrödinger decomposition—Continuity and quantum Hamilton–Jacobi equationsmathematical derivation
Configuration guidance—Deterministic continuous motionadded postulates + imported calculation
One-particle examples—Stationary-state and two-slit conclusionspaper calculations
Many-body transitions—Nonlocal dependence and quantized packet transitionconfiguration-space and scattering calculations
Measurement packets—Effective collapse without fundamental collapseapparatus-packet calculation
Equilibrium statistics—Equivariance and qualified relaxationderivation + author expectation
Contextual observables—Contextual momentum conclusionmeasurement interpretation
EPR nonlocality—Influence without equilibrium signalconfiguration-space interpretation
Radiation field—Quantized radiation transfer and probabilitiesdeferred field calculation
Completion and scopeConfiguration guidanceCompletion, statistical determinism, qualified scopeinterpretive synthesis + open obligations
Schrödinger route · schrodinger_decomposition_route_is_semantically_realized
Certifies the polar setup, decomposition calculation, printed p. 170 formula step, and continuity/Hamilton–Jacobi conclusion from its checked premise map.
Guidance route · configuration_guidance_route_is_semantically_realized
Independently certifies the added postulates, trajectory calculation, and deterministic motion from its checked premise map.
Examples route · one_particle_examples_route_is_semantically_realized
Independently certifies both stationary-state and two-slit calculations and their joint conclusion from the four checked premises.
Many-body route · many_body_transitions_route_is_semantically_realized
Independently certifies configuration-space nonlocality and the correlated transition-packet result from their separate checked premise pairs.
Measurement route · measurement_packets_route_is_semantically_realized
Independently certifies apparatus-packet selection and effective collapse from its checked premise map.
Equilibrium route · equilibrium_statistics_route_is_semantically_realized
Independently certifies equivariance and retains relaxation only as an expectation, with each result rebuilt from its checked premises.
Contextual route · contextual_observables_route_is_semantically_realized
Independently certifies the non-faithful, apparatus-contextual momentum conclusion from its checked premise map.
EPR route · epr_nonlocality_route_is_semantically_realized
Independently certifies nonlocal influence, no equilibrium signal, and standard relativistic predictions from its checked premise map.
Radiation route · radiation_field_route_is_semantically_realized
Independently certifies the field-mode setup, deferred calculation, and radiation conclusion from its checked premise map.
Completion route · completion_and_scope_route_is_semantically_realized
Uses the certified configuration-guidance route for dependency availability, reconstructs deterministic motion from the checked completion-step premises, and certifies the neutral descriptive transition, supplemented deterministic completion, determinate-outcome result, and qualified empirical scope.

Formal non-implications

Available factConclusion not suppliedLean witness
Regular polar sector, Hamilton–Jacobi relation, and quantum potentialThe full printed p. 170 system, including continuitynamed_polar_reduction_does_not_supply_printed_equations
Conserved densityActual configurationcontinuity_equation_does_not_supply_an_actual_configuration
Actual normalized stationary dynamics and preserved Born equilibriumFinite-time exact equilibration of a displaced ensemblethe_actual_displaced_ensemble_never_reaches_exact_born_equilibrium
Actual normalized rest after a constant potential shiftA positive total-energy originnormalized_stationary_rest_does_not_require_positive_total_energy
Separated apparatus branches with actual occupancyFundamental collapseeffective_branch_selection_does_not_require_fundamental_collapse
Instantaneous influenceControllable signalinstantaneous_configuration_influence_does_not_itself_supply_a_signal

The equilibrium and stationary-energy boundaries now use actual Gaussian waves and measures. Other controls retain finite source-formula, packet-support, or remote-configuration data; they do not thereby construct a complete microscopic measurement model.

Exhaustive coverage and inherited status

route_semantic_realization_is_exhaustive constructs all ten route certificates from raw paper-local inputs. Coverage uses conclusion-only certification only for premise-free source contracts; every substantive result rebuilds its physics from the exact checked premise map and contains no route-certificate output extraction. Dedicated source-map audits retain author-expectation status in relaxation, deferred-calculation status in the radiation result, added-physical-postulate ancestry in the completion, and open short-distance and relativistic obligations in the scope.

Lean-encoded bibliographic record

D. Bohm, A Suggested Interpretation of the Quantum Theory in Terms of “Hidden” Variables. I, Physical Review 85 (1952), 166–179; and II, Physical Review 85 (1952), 180–193. All page and equation locators above are stored in SourceMap.lean.

TraceComplete Lean semantic identifier ledger

Reading note. The article above is the human exposition. This collapsed cross-reference records every public theorem and every constructor of the five paper-local source-map vocabularies. It introduces no additional claim; its purpose is to make semantic omissions mechanically detectable.

Primary semantic theorems (115)

source_guidance_retains_phase_gradient_momentum_and_velocityphase_gradient_momentum_does_not_supply_mass_normalized_velocitysource_stationary_particle_has_zero_motion_and_positive_energypositive_stationary_energy_does_not_require_particle_motionstationary_rest_does_not_remove_the_quantum_potentialstationary_rest_does_not_supply_classical_quantum_force_balancesource_packets_have_one_actual_outcome_and_two_born_weightsseparated_packets_do_not_select_an_actual_occupied_branchcorrelated_packet_centers_do_not_supply_nonoverlapoccupied_packet_does_not_remove_the_other_wave_branchborn_weighted_branches_do_not_imply_multiple_actual_outcomessquared_wave_weights_do_not_supply_ensemble_probability_agreementsource_contextual_measurement_retains_apparatus_hidden_variablesidentical_system_configuration_does_not_determine_contextual_outcomecontextual_apparatuses_do_not_share_one_hidden_variable_distributiondifferent_apparatus_configurations_do_not_fix_distribution_contextmeasured_momentum_need_not_equal_premeasurement_particle_momentumsource_epr_correlations_change_motion_without_changing_signal_marginalepr_state_correlations_do_not_supply_remote_configuration_influenceunchanged_operational_marginal_does_not_imply_local_particle_motionthe_actual_amplitude_is_positivethe_squared_amplitude_is_the_gaussian_densitythe_actual_wave_has_the_stationary_born_densitythe_actual_wave_is_square_integrablethe_actual_born_measure_is_the_stationary_gaussianthe_amplitude_has_its_actual_derivativethe_amplitude_has_its_actual_second_derivativethe_wave_has_its_actual_spatial_derivativethe_wave_has_its_actual_second_spatial_derivativethe_phase_has_its_actual_derivativethe_wave_has_its_actual_time_derivativethe_actual_phase_has_positive_stationary_energythe_actual_wave_is_an_energy_eigenstatethe_actual_wave_satisfies_schrodinger_evolutionthe_actual_wave_has_no_nodesthe_actual_guidance_velocity_vanishesthe_quantum_potential_uses_the_same_actual_wave_amplitudethe_actual_classical_and_quantum_forces_balancethe_model_born_law_is_the_actual_stationary_wave_lawthe_actual_wave_is_normalizedthe_stationary_trajectories_obey_the_actual_wave_guidancethe_same_stationary_wave_and_flow_realize_the_dynamicsboth_actual_probability_laws_follow_the_stationary_flowactual_equilibrium_requires_the_zero_density_offsetthe_normalized_stationary_wave_has_a_nontrivial_eventthe_actual_stationary_ensemble_has_nonvacuous_born_equivariancethe_actual_displaced_ensemble_never_reaches_exact_born_equilibriumactual_positive_energy_does_not_require_particle_motionactual_stationary_rest_does_not_remove_the_quantum_potentialshifting_the_energy_origin_changes_the_actual_phase_frequencythe_energy_shift_factor_has_unit_moduluschanging_energy_origin_preserves_the_actual_born_measurethe_energy_shifted_wave_is_normalizedthe_energy_shifted_wave_has_its_spatial_derivativethe_energy_shifted_wave_has_its_second_spatial_derivativethe_energy_shifted_wave_has_its_time_derivativethe_energy_shifted_wave_solves_the_shifted_schrodinger_equationthe_energy_shifted_wave_has_no_nodeschanging_energy_origin_preserves_actual_restan_energy_origin_shift_preserves_the_normalized_stationary_dynamicsnormalized_stationary_rest_does_not_require_positive_total_energycoordinate_fields_retain_the_selected_physical_valuespolar_decomposition_calculation_retains_printed_equations_five_six_and_eightprinted_polar_equations_give_actual_born_currentschrodinger_polar_decomposition_yields_continuity_and_quantum_hamilton_jacobitrajectory_inputs_determine_the_actual_stateadded_configuration_guidance_and_uniqueness_yield_deterministic_continuous_motionguidance_postulates_retain_printed_phase_gradient_and_massguidance_data_realize_nonvacuous_unique_forward_evolutionstationary_and_two_slit_examples_separate_actual_motion_from_wave_effectsstationary_example_retains_zero_velocity_and_kinetic_energystationary_example_retains_zero_kinetic_positive_total_energyconfiguration_space_dynamics_and_packet_selection_explain_correlated_quantized_transitionsnonoverlapping_apparatus_packets_and_actual_configuration_yield_effective_collapseapparatus_measurement_retains_one_actual_outcome_and_born_weightsthe_actual_guided_ensemble_realizes_nonvacuous_born_equivarianceactual_equivariance_uses_the_phase_gradient_guidance_flowthe_actual_guided_ensemble_has_born_equivariance_and_current_velocityactual_configuration_transport_derives_later_density_agreementa_realized_source_density_defines_the_actual_born_measureactual_equivariance_retains_the_source_density_calibrationbohm_source_inputs_establish_equivariance_setup_and_calculationguided_density_equivariance_model_retains_paper_semanticsbohm_equivariance_setup_realizes_shared_setupbohm_equivariance_calculation_realizes_shared_calculationbohm_inputs_make_shared_equivariance_route_applicablebohm_source_inputs_make_shared_equivariance_route_applicablebohm_source_inputs_realize_structural_guided_density_equivariance_explanationbohm_source_inputs_realize_source_structural_guided_density_equivariance_explanationbohm_route_realizes_shared_guided_density_equivariancebohm_route_exhibits_nonvacuous_shared_guided_density_equivarianceestablished_bohm_equivariance_realizes_every_shared_claimbohm_guided_density_model_inputs_establish_theory_model_groundingbohm_route_establishes_theory_model_grounded_equivariancegrounded_bohm_equivariance_transfers_every_shared_claimequilibrium_is_preserved_while_general_relaxation_remains_an_expectationstandard_momentum_observable_need_not_reveal_premeasurement_particle_momentumcontextual_measurement_retains_distinct_apparatus_distributionsstandard_momentum_mathematical_observable_is_actively_unfaithfulepr_route_is_nonlocal_but_not_a_controllable_signal_in_quantum_equilibriumepr_analysis_retains_equal_marginal_and_remote_motion_changefield_configuration_and_superwave_extend_packet_logic_to_radiation_quantacompletion_setup_realizes_descriptive_completeness_transitionpaper_realizes_supplemented_deterministic_completionprobabilistic_predictions_coexist_with_a_determinate_individual_outcomestandard_statistics_and_hidden_configuration_keep_probability_roles_distinctempirical_equivalence_is_atomic_regime_scoped_and_short_distance_extensions_remain_speculativenamed_polar_reduction_does_not_supply_printed_equationscontinuity_equation_does_not_supply_an_actual_configurationequivariance_does_not_prove_relaxation_from_arbitrary_nonequilibriumeffective_branch_selection_does_not_require_fundamental_collapseinstantaneous_configuration_influence_does_not_itself_supply_a_signalexcursion_history_uses_the_same_transport_mapexcursion_velocity_uses_the_same_phase_guidancecorrect_born_pushforwards_do_not_establish_guidance

Coverage theorems (12)

every_source_claim_has_semanticsschrodinger_decomposition_route_is_semantically_realizedconfiguration_guidance_route_is_semantically_realizedone_particle_examples_route_is_semantically_realizedmany_body_transitions_route_is_semantically_realizedmeasurement_packets_route_is_semantically_realizedequilibrium_statistics_route_is_semantically_realizedcontextual_observables_route_is_semantically_realizedepr_nonlocality_route_is_semantically_realizedradiation_field_route_is_semantically_realizedcompletion_and_scope_route_is_semantically_realizedall_routes_are_semantically_realizable

Source-map audit theorems (19)

argument_wellFormedargument_auditableroutes_wellFormedroutes_have_exact_predecessor_graphroutes_have_exact_dependency_closureearly_local_inputs_are_independent_hypotheseslate_local_inputs_are_independent_hypothesesearly_calculation_contracts_are_independent_hypotheseslate_calculation_contracts_are_independent_hypothesesprinted_polar_formula_step_applies_exact_calculation_inputsearly_result_steps_apply_selected_inputs_and_contractspolar_result_retains_printed_formula_steplate_result_steps_apply_selected_inputs_and_contractsindependent_paper_local_routes_do_not_claim_unearned_predecessor_outputscompletion_route_consumes_certified_deterministic_motionrelaxation_claim_retains_author_expectationradiation_route_retains_deferred_calculationcompletion_retains_added_physical_postulatesscope_retains_open_short_distance_and_relativistic_obligations

Semantic atoms (42)

schrodingerPolarSetuppolarDecompositionCalculationprintedPolarReductionFormulaBundlecontinuityAndQuantumHamiltonJacobiconfigurationGuidancePostulatestrajectoryExistenceUniquenessCalculationdeterministicContinuousMotionstationaryStateSetupstationaryStateCalculationtwoSlitSetuptwoSlitCalculationoneParticleExampleConclusionsmanyBodySetupmanyBodyCalculationconfigurationSpaceNonlocalitytransitionPacketSetuptransitionPacketCalculationcorrelatedQuantizedTransitionmeasurementPacketSetupmeasurementPacketCalculationeffectiveCollapseWithoutFundamentalCollapseequivarianceSetupequivarianceCalculationequilibriumPreservationrelaxationAssessmentqualifiedRelaxationClaimstandardMomentumMeasurementRuncontextualObservableCalculationcontextualMomentumConclusioneprSetupeprCalculationnonlocalInfluenceWithoutEquilibriumSignalradiationFieldSetupradiationFieldCalculationradiationQuantumConclusioncompletionSetupsupplementedDeterministicCompletionpredictiveBranchingSetupindividualOutcomeDeterminationprobabilisticPredictionWithDeterminateOutcomepaperScopeAssessmentqualifiedEmpiricalScope

Claim identifiers (42)

polarSetuppolarCalculationpolarFormulapolarConclusionguidancePostulatestrajectoryCalculationdeterministicMotionstationarySetupstationaryCalculationslitSetupslitCalculationexamplesConclusionmanyBodySetupmanyBodyCalculationnonlocalManyBodytransitionSetuptransitionCalculationtransitionConclusionmeasurementSetupmeasurementCalculationeffectiveCollapseequilibriumSetupequilibriumCalculationequilibriumPreservedrelaxationAssessmentrelaxationQualifiedmomentumRuncontextualCalculationcontextualConclusioneprSetupeprCalculationeprConclusionradiationSetupradiationCalculationradiationConclusioncompletionSetupcompletionConclusionbranchingSetupoutcomeDeterminationstatisticalDeterminismscopeAssessmentscopeConclusion

Step identifiers (42)

statePolarSetupsupplyPolarCalculationretainPolarFormuladerivePolarConclusionstateGuidancePostulatessupplyTrajectoryCalculationderiveDeterministicMotionstateStationarySetupsupplyStationaryCalculationstateSlitSetupsupplySlitCalculationderiveExamplesConclusionstateManyBodySetupsupplyManyBodyCalculationderiveManyBodyNonlocalitystateTransitionSetupsupplyTransitionCalculationderiveTransitionConclusionstateMeasurementSetupsupplyMeasurementCalculationderiveEffectiveCollapsestateEquilibriumSetupsupplyEquivarianceCalculationderiveEquilibriumPreservationstateRelaxationAssessmentretainQualifiedRelaxationstateMomentumRunsupplyContextualCalculationderiveContextualConclusionstateEprSetupsupplyEprCalculationderiveEprConclusionstateRadiationSetupsupplyRadiationCalculationderiveRadiationConclusionstateCompletionSetupderiveCompletionConclusionstateBranchingSetupstateOutcomeDeterminationderiveStatisticalDeterminismstateScopeAssessmentretainQualifiedScope

Route identifiers (10)

schrodingerDecompositionconfigurationGuidanceoneParticleExamplesmanyBodyTransitionsmeasurementPacketsequilibriumStatisticscontextualObservableseprNonlocalityradiationFieldcompletionAndScope

Route kinds (10)

polarSchrodingerReductionaddedConfigurationDynamicsstationaryAndInterferenceExamplesconfigurationSpaceAndScatteringPacketsapparatusPacketSelectionequivarianceAndRelaxationStatusapparatusContextualObservableeprConfigurationSpaceInfluencefieldModeConfigurationExtensionempiricalCompletionAndQualifiedExtensions

R

Checked source-route details

This ledger is generated from the elaborated Lean route records. It lists direct predecessors, ordered inference steps, and exported claims. The independent fidelity audit checks every field; this ledger does not replace the physical semantics or certify every explanatory diagram.

schrodingerDecomposition

Logical kind: polarSchrodingerReduction.

Required predecessor routes: none.

Ordered inference steps: statePolarSetup, supplyPolarCalculation, retainPolarFormula, derivePolarConclusion.

Exported conclusions: polarConclusion.

configurationGuidance

Logical kind: addedConfigurationDynamics.

Required predecessor routes: none.

Ordered inference steps: stateGuidancePostulates, supplyTrajectoryCalculation, deriveDeterministicMotion.

Exported conclusions: deterministicMotion.

oneParticleExamples

Logical kind: stationaryAndInterferenceExamples.

Required predecessor routes: none.

Ordered inference steps: stateStationarySetup, supplyStationaryCalculation, stateSlitSetup, supplySlitCalculation, deriveExamplesConclusion.

Exported conclusions: examplesConclusion.

manyBodyTransitions

Logical kind: configurationSpaceAndScatteringPackets.

Required predecessor routes: none.

Ordered inference steps: stateManyBodySetup, supplyManyBodyCalculation, deriveManyBodyNonlocality, stateTransitionSetup, supplyTransitionCalculation, deriveTransitionConclusion.

Exported conclusions: nonlocalManyBody, transitionConclusion.

measurementPackets

Logical kind: apparatusPacketSelection.

Required predecessor routes: none.

Ordered inference steps: stateMeasurementSetup, supplyMeasurementCalculation, deriveEffectiveCollapse.

Exported conclusions: effectiveCollapse.

equilibriumStatistics

Logical kind: equivarianceAndRelaxationStatus.

Required predecessor routes: none.

Ordered inference steps: stateEquilibriumSetup, supplyEquivarianceCalculation, deriveEquilibriumPreservation, stateRelaxationAssessment, retainQualifiedRelaxation.

Exported conclusions: equilibriumPreserved, relaxationQualified.

contextualObservables

Logical kind: apparatusContextualObservable.

Required predecessor routes: none.

Ordered inference steps: stateMomentumRun, supplyContextualCalculation, deriveContextualConclusion.

Exported conclusions: contextualConclusion.

eprNonlocality

Logical kind: eprConfigurationSpaceInfluence.

Required predecessor routes: none.

Ordered inference steps: stateEprSetup, supplyEprCalculation, deriveEprConclusion.

Exported conclusions: eprConclusion.

radiationField

Logical kind: fieldModeConfigurationExtension.

Required predecessor routes: none.

Ordered inference steps: stateRadiationSetup, supplyRadiationCalculation, deriveRadiationConclusion.

Exported conclusions: radiationConclusion.

completionAndScope

Logical kind: empiricalCompletionAndQualifiedExtensions.

Required predecessor routes: configurationGuidance.

Ordered inference steps: stateCompletionSetup, deriveCompletionConclusion, stateBranchingSetup, stateOutcomeDetermination, deriveStatisticalDeterminism, stateScopeAssessment, retainQualifiedScope.

Exported conclusions: completionConclusion, statisticalDeterminism, scopeConclusion.