--- name: select-inventive-principle description: "Select one or more inventive principles appropriate to a contradiction or transformation objective and state why each principle applies." --- # select-inventive-principle ## Purpose Select TRIZ inventive principles appropriate to a contradiction or transformation objective and state why each applies. ## Input contract ```yaml required: [contradiction_statement, improvement_parameter, worsening_parameter] optional: [system_components, operating_conditions, candidate_principles] constraints: [selection must cite the contradiction and a concrete transformation rationale] ``` ## Procedure 1. Normalize the contradiction and identify the improving and worsening parameters. 2. Consider the full 40-principle TRIZ vocabulary individually: 1 Segmentation; 2 Taking out; 3 Local quality; 4 Asymmetry; 5 Merging; 6 Universality; 7 Nested doll; 8 Counterweight; 9 Preliminary anti-action; 10 Preliminary action; 11 Beforehand cushioning; 12 Equipotentiality; 13 The other way round; 14 Spheroidality/curvature; 15 Dynamics; 16 Partial or excessive action; 17 Another dimension; 18 Mechanical vibration; 19 Periodic action; 20 Continuity of useful action; 21 Skipping; 22 Blessing in disguise; 23 Feedback; 24 Mediator; 25 Self-service; 26 Copying; 27 Cheap short-living objects; 28 Mechanics substitution; 29 Pneumatics/hydraulics; 30 Flexible shells/thin films; 31 Porous materials; 32 Color changes; 33 Homogeneity; 34 Discarding and recovering; 35 Parameter changes; 36 Phase transitions; 37 Thermal expansion; 38 Strong oxidants; 39 Inert atmosphere; 40 Composite materials. 3. For each principle, mark applicable, rejected, or not testable and state the contradiction-specific reason. 4. Rank applicable principles and pass the selected set to transformation. If the chosen principle requires separating conflicting requirements across space, time, scale, or condition, consider `apply-separation-principle` as the next tactic. ## Output contract ```yaml produces: [principle_applicability_matrix, selected_principles, selection_rationale] delta_fields: [findings, hypothesis_updates, uncertainties, decisions, recommended_jumps] ``` ## Quality gates - All 40 principles appear individually; every selected principle has a contradiction-specific rationale and every rejected principle has a recorded reason. ## Failure and counterexamples Reject "appropriate principle" summaries, selections without parameter mapping, or principle names detached from a proposed transformation. ## Provenance map - `triz/contradiction-matrix`: concept (no exact pool entry). - `inventive-principle-selection`: concept (no exact pool entry).