--- name: pre-mortem description: > Use for a pre-mortem, or before committing to a plan, launch or migration: "what could go wrong?", "stress test this plan", "how might this fail?", "risks before we ship". Assumes failure, lists causes, ranks them and sets mitigations. Skip for explaining a failure that already happened. license: MIT metadata: author: ysskrishna version: "2026.10.5" --- # Pre-mortem Gary Klein's technique: imagine the plan **has already failed**, then work backward to explain why. Assuming failure makes it safe to name risks that optimism hides. ## When to use - Before a launch, migration, reorg, contract, hire, architecture change or any hard-to-reverse commitment. - "What could go wrong?", "stress test this", "play out the failure". - A plan everyone likes and nobody has attacked. Skip: explaining a failure that already happened, or reviewing the logic of an argument rather than a plan. ## Before you start 1. State in one block: **Plan** (what, who, by when), **Failure definition** (what "failed badly" means, observable), **Horizon**, and **Pass** (Imagine, Causes, Rank, Mitigate, Decide). 2. **Gather first.** Read the plan, timeline, dependencies, past incidents and similar launches before generating causes. Ask up to 3 questions only for what tools cannot answer. 3. **Light path.** Small ask: 6 causes, top 3 ranked, one mitigation each. ## Steps ### 1. Imagine Write one sentence in the past tense: "It is [date]. The [plan] failed badly: [failure definition]." ### 2. Causes List reasons it failed. Cover different angles so they do not cluster: people and skills, process and timeline, technology and dependencies, customers and market, money, external events. Add one **inversion** prompt: "What would guarantee failure?" and list what you would then have to avoid. Each cause is a specific story ("the vendor API changes its rate limit during launch week"), not a category ("vendor risk"). ### 3. Rank For each cause give a plain-language **likelihood**, **impact** if it happens, and an **early warning sign**. Keep the top 5-8. | Cause | Likelihood | Impact | Early warning | |-------|-----------|--------|---------------| ### 4. Mitigate For each top cause choose one: - **Prevent:** change the plan so it cannot happen. - **Detect:** a metric or check that shows it early. - **Respond:** a rehearsed fallback. Add an **owner** (or "to be assigned"). ### 5. Decide - **Plan changes** to make now. - **Tripwires:** conditions under which the plan is paused, changed or stopped. - **Go / no-go** statement: go as is, go with changes, or hold until named risks are reduced. ## Pitfalls - Generic risks ("scope creep") with no story. Write what it looks like when it happens. - Everything high likelihood and high impact. Force a ranking; a list where all items matter does not guide action. - Mitigations nobody owns. Name an owner or mark it unassigned. - Using it on something already failed. That is a postmortem; use a root-cause method. - Treating the output as a promise that nothing else will go wrong. Revisit at each tripwire. Worked example: [references/example.md](references/example.md). ## Checklist - [ ] Plan, failure definition and horizon stated - [ ] Failure written in the past tense - [ ] Causes are specific stories across several angles, plus an inversion prompt - [ ] Ranked with likelihood, impact and an early warning sign - [ ] Mitigations are prevent, detect or respond, with owners - [ ] Tripwires and a go / no-go statement