'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'GH0K*RLK*P%V$Q-V`2LKT\"4E\nM)<-NPP(\"R,C(;B4EFT1*2NCHIJ;4JL]75\\B`P2&(\\6Z`1$/Q[/&J3;YJ+2WE\nM<\"3T*08WSUAX>'%X$DFYL^/FYN;FY+)6%A824E2VYN2TN0D$L\"U-1KU-34\nMU(>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX'AX&!@=;6FYN;/CZ@KH@0\nMM8B@/CX^/CX^/CX^/IN;FPH*\"@H*\"@H*\"@HD)\"0D)\"0D2/+R(2'@AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>$=7B>P'5U=75UJ9Z>`0$!A':\\$W8!*]!A)25+PVYN`@(\"`@(\"`LC(\nMU,C(R`(\";L,E)=`KAX>'AX?/5\\@%2JYNP$V^L[/:N(,D*3`P8W`D*=DKJ9[0\nM*W@'`8>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>\"$[R\"@@``86'#2\\C(\nM?EI^'60P!F#U]?7U4'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AW6IGIZ>Y7`DT*E0\nM@R3T,\"OP@R0I+=KE<\"3:9\"T^K.SL(NRL\\>P\"U-34U,C(`B4ET\"L!O+R$`0$K\nMT\"5U`82'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AW@!GMFI\nMJ0<'`82\\$Q,3O`$KT&$E)25A)6X\"R,C4`L-+)3Y$1$3!P:;(JL]75\\B`P3NN\nMK,.J1\"'Q[/&J3;YJ+2WE<\"3T*0;,8/7UAX?U]8$DFSX^PVYN;F[#2R4E)24E\nM)4MN;FYND&Y+U-34U&MKU`*'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'A[QV`2MA6Q2BJDJN%%M-(8AH:(#H0QU:[VQ*KNS&\\3ZL[,:@9-J'AX>'\nMAX&!@=;6))N;FSX^H*ZU$+6(H*`^/CX^/CX^/CZ;FR0*\"@H*\"@H*)\"0D)\"0D\nM)\"28OO+@(2'@AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX=2=9Z>P'5U=76IGIZ>>'@!`5*$`7B>GG5A\nM)25+2VYN`@(\"`LC(R,C4U,@\";DLE8=`K`81VAX>'AX?J5\\CI2J!NP$V^LRTM\nMJJ8DVBTMSG`D*=G0J:G0*WB5O(>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAP%V$[QV4@`K86%+R-3(U%I^'60P!E'U45',E(PPVBUD9(>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AW6>GIZ>Y7`DT-!0@R0I,-#P@R3:9\"WE<\"3:9\"T^K.SL'6CQ;@+4U-34\nMU,C(:ULV-MD'4I4'V=G9-FMKP#@!AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>>`0&IJ:F>!Y65>`%24E)24E)XGJFIJ0$K825N`M34R`)NP\\/#\nMIJ9-34W(JM175]3(P3NNK,.J1\"&L[*RJ34AJ+=KEX22,]#=@45%1AQ?U]9\\*\nMFR4EPVYN;F[#2R4E)24E)4M+;FX\";DM+`FO4U-34U`*'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AQP<.>Y&;EL4JDJN%%M-.XC&:(#H0\\9:[VQ*\nMKNSL\\3ZL[&BNK\"V'AX>'A];6UB0D))L^FSX^H*Z(M1\"UB*Z@/CX^/CX^/CZ;\nMFR0*\"@H*\"@H*)\"28F)B8F)AJOO+@(>#RAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX\nMGIZ>>'@!`82$`9Z>=74E)4M+2VYN`@+(R-3(R-34R`)N2R70*P$!A':\\AX>'\nMAPW/HF[I2J##P$V^I\"UDJF4^+61DSG!JVMG0J:DK*W@!=H>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'`5*\\$Q.\\4BLK)4M+R-34U-3O'60PE%%@S#>,C-ID\nMK*RLK&2'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AW6>GIZ>Y>$D*^Y0920IVF'I93XM9\"WE<&K:\nM+2T^K.SL:.]N`LC4U-34U,AK:VLV-MD'E94'V=DV-FMKS\\];6W6>AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'`812E0<'GIYX`5(!`82$`0$!4H0!>)Z>\nMGA.$*R5+;LC(U-0\"`FYNPV'EY>7(JM175]3(P3NNK,.J1#NL\\:RJ34B8VMKD\nMX22,!LQ145%@WO7U]1'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'.5D<.>Y&2UL4JDI#\nM%&Y-.XC&:(#H0\\9:[VQ*KNSL\\3ZL[&BN\\2V'AX>'AX'6UB0D)&H^/CX^H*Z(\nMB!`0M8B@H*`^/CX^/CX^FYL*\"@H*\"@H*)\"28F)AJ:FIJ._+@(>#@AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AXGIZ>GG@!`80!>)ZI=74E2TM+PVX\"`LC4R,C4R-3(\nM`F[#)=`K`0&$O!,3AX>'A^O/%,/I1#Y+.$V^I&2LJD0^K*RLSDAJVJDKJ9XK\nM*W@!=C@EAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>\"=A,3$Q.\\4BLK)9!N`LC4\nMU,C(`F2,S/7,E(PI+:SL[.SL\\:RLAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AW6>GIZ>Y>$D*^Y0\nM923:+27I1#YDK&3E<&HM9&2@K.SL[UH\"R,C4U,C(R-1K:VLV-MG965)9V=DV\nM-FL)S\\_/SU=75Q2'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'A`&$`0$!`94'>'@!\nMA(2$A(12`0$!`82$`0$!*P$3`=`E;@+(U-3(R`(\";B4E*V.J`H!75]2`P2&(\nM\\'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX?N.5D<6>Y&)'\nMAX'6UB0D)#X^/CX^H*\"NB+40$(BNH*\"@H#X^/CX^FYL*\"H&!@0H*)\"0DF)AJ\nM:FJ@.^#@(?+@AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AXGIZ>>'@!`80!GIYU=3A+\nM2TM+\\2(=:+'(U-3(U,@\";L,E8=`K`7:\\$[QVAX`0&$`0%X>)Z>AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AW83\nM$[R\\$[QV``$K*R7#`LC(R-3(;B4!45%@E/0MK.SL[.SLK*RL\\>R'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AZF>GIYXG.$*`>Y0@R3:9\"7I1*\"L\\:SE2&IDK*R@\\<8=6EJB5U=75Z*B\nM5PEK:VLV-MG9!Y65!]DV-FL)S\\_/S\\_/5ULXP%=7AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>>\nM>)YX`8124@$!`0$!`0&$4@$!`0$!`7AX>`&$A(2'T\"MV`=`EPV[(R-3(U,_/\nM:ULVV:FJR(!75]2`P2&((FX%1\"&L\\61&34B8VBF'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX)Z>8(>'AX'6UB0D:CX^/CX^H*Z(B+40$+6(KJ\"@H*\"@/CX^\nMFYL*\"H&!@8$*)\"0DF)AJ:FJ@.R$A(?+@AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'=76$P'5UJ9Z>\nMGGAX>'@!A%)XGG5U.,!+2TMN(AUHL7[4R,C(R`)N;DLET(19J75U=<#`6Q04\nM5U=NP\"5U=3XE)4V^LV2LJD0^K/'QSD1JVJDK*YX!`0&$O`%2A`$!GIZ>J:EU\nMJ9Z>>`&$`7@!AX>'O!,3@H*\"@H*\"O((`*]`E;@(\"R,C(;B4!O&!@E\"ED\\>S&\nMQNSL\\?'Q[.S&L8>'AX>'AX>'AYZ>GIYXG.$*`>Y0@R3:9\"7I2J#Q[\")-2J#Q\nM(O&@[+%H6EI75U=7%!04AX=K:S8VV=D'!Y52!]DV-FL)S\\_/S\\_/SX#/S\\!U\nM=77`%%O`P#C`P,!;6\\!U=9YX`5)24@$!`0$!`5*$`0$!`0$!>'AXGG@!`8>'\nMA]F56=DV6VO/S^K/S\\_/SVLVH]FJR(!75]2`Z\"&Y'0(%1\"'Q[&2J34B8VBF<\nMX0HWS!=14'AX>'AX>'AX>'AUO`P,`X.#AU=76IGGA24@%XGJEUT\"7#2S9;\nM`DLV%!34U,B-M>^]6FS3B.QH(J#Q:+&N\\9IXGJEU=74XP%L45U>@/J\"@KHB(\nMM1`0$+6(B*ZNH*\"@H#X^FYL*\"H&!@8$*\"B0D))AJ:J\"@.R$A(?(0AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AW4!.'5UJ9Z>GGAX>`&$A`%XGG5U.,!+;FX\"'6BQ?G[(U,C(GGB\\\nM=@$Y[D:C6UM;%!2B5U=75Z)NPR4E825A)24E)24E)<,^9*Q+)25AT\"LK*P$!\nM`5)VO!,3$Q,3$Q,3O((K*RLK*RLK*RL!AX>\\$Q.\"@H*\"O!,3$X(!`2LE2\\-N\nMR,C4;B4!>%)2>-JL\\>SLQNSL[.SQ\\>SL[&BQAX>'AX>'AYZ>GIYXG\">!`>Y0\nM@R3:9\"7I2J#Q[.Q-2J[L'>RN:%KO6EI75U=7%!2'AX>'-C;9V0<'65)2!]G9\nM-FMKS\\_/S\\_/S\\_/S\\_/S\\_/%!04%!175U=7%,!UJ7@!A(12`0$!`0$!4H2$\nM`0$!`7AX>)Z>GIYXAX>'AX>56=DV-FNBS\\_/S\\_/SVLVH]FJU(!75]2`Z`RY\nM:,@%2D/Q[&2J34B8VBF*EUP%M;HL]U;@(\"\nM;FX\"R-34R,C(R,A+?R#4U-0@?W\\@(-2'AX>'AX>'AX>'AVP%!;23S| 'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'=75UGIZ>>'@!`82$`7B>GG4XP,!N\nM;@(\":+%^?N_(R`(\"GGB$GG7`6Q175U=7%!046UM;P#@E)6'0825A)24E)24E\nM)4M+2R4E86'0*RLK*RL!`0%VO!,3$Q-V=H12`0$!*RLK*RLK*RLKA[P3$Q.\"\nM@H*\\$[R\\@H2$`2O0)27#`LC4;B4K>%)2>'5UP.SL[,;&[.SL\\?'L[.RQ[UKO\nMSU=75YZ>GIYXG\">!`>Y0@R0I+27I2J#Q[!U-TZ[&:!VUL;U:6EH45U=75X>'\nMAX>'AS;9V0<'65)2!]G9-FMK\"<_/S\\_/SX#/S\\_/S\\_/SU=76EJ]O5JB6W5U\nMGG@!A(0!`0$!4H2$A(0!`0$!`0%X>)Z>GIZ'AX>'AX>'6:G9='AX>'\nMAX>'A^+B!07I!`3-S | 'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AW6IGIYX\nM`0$!4A.\\=GAXGJEU=<#`P,!;6[U:S\\^BHFLV>`$!GG7`6Q175U<46\\#`.'5U\nMJ2O086$E2\\-N;FYN;L,E)24E1D;N!P=9.5*4E)24-W9VO!,3$Q.\\=G9VA(0!\nM`0$!*RLKT-`K4@\"5O!-VO+QV4C,K`79VA`'0)25+`M34;B5X`80!GG4XP,!;\nM6^S&[.SL\\?'L[.RQ[UKO[*S:])Z>GIYXG.$*`>Y0@R0I+27I1*#Q[!U-TXAH\nM[[$06KU^6EI;%%=7AX>'AX>'AX?9V0<'65)2!P?9-C9K:PG/S\\_/SX#/S\\_/\nMS\\_/S\\]:6KV]O5IH6W5UGG@!A%(!`0&$A(12`0%X>`$!`0%X>'B>AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AUFIJ75U6Q2BSU?/S\\];P,\"J5^I75QN`7PRVL<@.7T,B[*RJ34B8VBF<\nMH9_,41=1S)0PE0%2`0>>J0J77`J:EUAX<\"`LC4U,C(`FX\"R,C(R-34\nMU\"`@(\"`@?W]+2X>'AX>'AX>'A^+BXFSIZ>D$!`3-S2@H*#D<'*LH4&-C8\\[.\nMSDMN;@(\"`LC(U-3(U-3(R,C4R,@\"`H\"J@(!_?UJQ:&AH:,;L[.QHL>]:O>_&\nM[.EHB-R(B&XI]/2,C(R,C(R,]-HM\"@H*\"B0D))AJH*Z((;40M;6(AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AW79V0<'69524E)9!P?9V=DV-C9K:VMK:[U:5Z(46\\!U`80!\nMGG4XP!175U<46\\#`.'5UJ:EU=3C`6UM;6S:JJJI&)=DP,\"DIC(R,5I0&!@:4\nME(1VO!,3$Q,3$[R\\O':$`0$!*RO0T\"LK82LK=A,3$Q-V,S,!A+P3O`'0825+\nM`M34;ME24H0!GG5UP,#`P,#`P,#`\\>SL[,:Q[^^Q[*Q_?YZ>GIZ>Y>$*`>Y0\nM@R0I+27I1*#Q[&A-(8BQ6GX06KVQ6K'`6U>'AX>'AX>'AX>'V0<'65)260?9\nMV38V:VL)\"<_/SX\"`S\\_JS\\_/6EI:6KV]6EJQ[#AUGIX!4H12`82$4@$!>)Z>\nMGIZ>GIZ>GIZ'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX54@$'J76IJ8>'AX?(\nMR,C4R,@\";FX\"`@(\"`LC(U-0@(']_`G\\\"`@)+AX>'AX>'A^+BX@X%Z>GIZ00$\nM!,W-*\"@Y'*LH4&-CSL[.SL[.!04%!04%!8\"`@&L)@(\"`@+V]O5JQL;'O[^^Q\nM:&AH:,;L[,:Q6EJ]O>_&[(B(B(B(B,,I*?2,C(R,C(R,C\"G:9*SQ[#L[.SL[\nM(8BUB+40M8B(AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'A]G9!P>54E)2`95X>)Z>J:EU=3@X\nMP,!;6[V]5\\C(2\\,EA`%XGG5UP%L45U=7%%O`.'5UJ75U=<#`6UM;6UO`=2TM\nM+2TMVMHI*2GTC(R,C(P&!@&$O!,3$Q,3$Q,3$[QVA`$!*RLK*RL!86$``\"L!\nM=A-V`0$!=KP3O`$K827#`M34APGJF>Y>$D*^Y0@R0I+27I1*#Q[&C!(1!:6GZUL>\\=?K$@?W]_?\\C(\nMR,C(`@)+2TM\\E5)260?9V=DV:VMK\"<_/S\\_JZNK/S\\]:O5I:O;V]O5I::.S`\nM=:F>`0&$A%(!`0%XGIZIJ:F>J:EU=8>'AX>'AX>'AX>';C:JJC:JJJJJJJJ`\nM\"7]_?W^`U(!75]3J7PRVL=0.7T/Q[*RJ34AJVBGKH1=18,!HPV@H*\"@H('\nM>`>5`5*5>*FIAX>'AX>'R,C(R,@\";FYN`FYN`LC(R-34(\"!_`G]_?W\\@(\"#(\nMAX>'A^+BXN(.!07IZ>GI!`3-S2@Y'*LH4%!C8\\[.SL[.SL[.SFQL;&QL!05L\nM6KV]O;V]O5JQL;&Q[^^QL6AH:,;LQFCO6KV]6K'&[*Z(B(B(KDO:*?3TC(P&\nM!@:,C/0IVF1DK+Z^OKZ^.XB(B+6UB*ZNAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'A]D'6952\nM4@$!>'AX`9Z>GJEU=GJEU='V=D!>)YU=74X\nM.#@X.#C`P,!;6W]_?W\\@(\"`@(-#0*W6IY7`D*RM0@R3:9\"7I1*#Q[&C!(1!:\nM6K&(';$BU,A+PY!A84M+2VYN;FYNN8A\\4E(S!P?9V=DV-FMK:\\_/S\\_/S\\_/\nMS^_O6KU:O;U:6KU:6N]HP'6IGGAX`0$!`0%XGJEU=75U=76'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>';FXE81%&1D9&JJJJ\"0)_?W_4U(!7R,CJ7PRV[]0%7T/Q[*RJY4AJVHSK\nMWA=146`W!@'AX>'A\\C(`@(\";FYN;FYN;LC(\nMU,C(?W]_`M34U-0@U-34U\"!_A^(.#N+B#@4%!>GIZ00$S2@Y'!PH4&-C8\\[.\nMSL[.SLYLSFQL;&QL;&QL6EJ]O;V]O5KOL;'O6EKOL6AH:&C&:+%:O;U:6K'&\nM[&ZNKHBNKB7:*2GTC(P&!@8&C(ST*=HMOKZ^OCN^OJZNKHB(KJ\"@AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AW@!`82$`0$!>'AX`9Z>GJEU=3C`P%M;%+V]5U>B6UNC`9Z>\nMGIZI=77`%%=7HEO`=75UJ75U.,!;6UM;6\\`X==HM+=HM+2TM9&0M+=K:*3`P\nM,\"L!EU]5%145'U]5%@-P$!`0$!`0$!`5)V$Q,!A':\\$Q,3$[R\\$X0!T\"5N\nMR,B'AX>'AW@V>)ZI=75U.,`X.#C`P,/#D)\"0D\"4E)24E)=#0T-#0T'70T\"LK\nMJ74E)24EP,!N`LC4R-34R,C(`@)NR,A_?W]_?P)K`JJJI*2(W*Y>`$!4@%XGIYU\nM=75UAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>';FY+)270[NY&1C:J\"0)_(\"#4U`+(R-34U-34\nMU-2`Z$/QK*RJY4B8*8R$#?51S`$!*]`ED)`E)24E86$K*RL!AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX?(`@(\"`FYN;L/#;@+4R,C4R`)N2\\L\"?R#4(-345U?/5P4%#@[BXFP%!>GI\nMZ>D$S2@Y'!PYS6-C8\\[.SL[.;&QL;&QL;&QL;&QL6EJ]O;V]O;U:[^]:6EI:\nM[[&Q:&AH:+%:O5I:[[%H[&ZNKJZNH\"4P*?3TC(R,C(R,C(R,]\"EP&$A(OKZ^\nMOJ\"NKJZNKJ\"@AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AP$!A(0!`7AX>)Z>*RN>GG5U=3C`\nMP%L4HKU^U']+;I`1>)Z>GIZ>=77`%%=75UO`=75UGJEU.,!;6Q046\\`X==HM\nM+2UD9&2LK/'QK&1D,#`P,#\",C)1@]5%18%'U]5',-X2$`0$!`0&$$Q,3A`$!\nM>`%2A(2$`0$!O(0KT\"5N`H>'AX>'AX>'==FIV75U=<#`P.XK*RL````````K\nM*RLK*RO0T\"4E)24E8=#0T\"4E)4M+P\\-N`LC(U-34U,C(`@)N;FY+2TM+RW\\)\nMR+F(I*2(W*Y'AP?9V=DV-C8V:VMK\"<_/SVAH[.SL:'Y:6EI:6EJ]O5I:\nM:/$MJ9Z>GG@!`0%XGIYU=76'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>';FXE)25AT\"70[NY&\nM-B4E)9!N;FX\"`LC(U!O4U-34R`)N2R4E)270*RMVO!.\\A`$!*]!A86%A86$K\nM*RLK*RL!4G:'AX>'AX>'AX>'`@(\"`@+#PTM+PVX\"R,C4U,@\"%*)75U=75U=7\nM5U=75P4%#@[BXN(.!07IZ>D$S2@H'!PY*%!C8\\[.SLYL;&QL;&QL;&QL;&QL\nM[UJ]O;V]O;U:6EI:O;U:6K&QL6AHL;%:O5KO[[%H[`*(KJZ@H\"4P,/2,C(R,\nMC/3T]/3T*2D8&$B^OKZ^OJ\"@KJZNKJ`^AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AP&$A`$!\nM>'B>GIZ>*RN>J75U=3C`6UL4HGY^U`)N;I`1GIZ>GIZ>=77`%%=75UO`=76I\nMGJEUP,!;%!046\\`X=2TM+2UDK/'L[.SL[.SQ9\"TMVC`PC(PW4?5145'U46`W\nM-X2$A(2$=KP3A(12`0%X>'@!4H2$`0%24GB>=3A;AX>'AX>'AX>'AX?`V=FC\nM=94<'!P3$Q.\\O+P3$Q,3$Q.\\@@$!*]#0T-#0T-#0824E)24E2\\/#2VX\"R,C(\nMU-34U-2`@(!+2TM+PZ2DW+F(I*2(B*16AX>'AX>'V38V-C8V-FMK:VMK[.PB\nM\\?'Q[!VQL;'O6EJ]O5I::/%DVJF>GIZ>GIZ>GJFE1T??>BHJ>D>E\"V9FQ#&'\nMAX>';L,E)25A8270)6Z`SW]_('_4U-3(R,C4U!O4U-34R`)NPR4E)270T\"L!\nM`7:\\$W8!`=!A824ED)`E)6%A*RLK*U*\\$[R'AX>'AX>'A\\C(R`)NPTLE)D$!,TH.1P<.2AC8\\[.\nMSFQL;&QL;&QL;&P%!05LL>]:O;V]O;V]O;V]O;V]6N^QL;&Q[UI:O5KO[[%H\nM[,B(B*Z@H$OTC(P&E`:,C(ST]/3T].%P&$B^.SL[.Z\"@KJZNH*!JAX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX2$`0%XGIZ>GIZ>*RO0=77`P%M;:Z+/SUI^:S9N;A$1GIZ>\nMGIZ>=77`%%=7HELX=76>GIYUP%M;%!046\\`X=2TM9&1D\\>SL:+&QL6@BK*QD\nM9\"TP*8P&S%'U]?7U4'AX`0%2A(0!>)YU=3B'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'A\\#9H:&AH:&AH:&AH:&AH:&AY.2'AX>'\nMAXQHL>]:6KU::.RL9\"UU=76IGIZ>Q`NE\nM1]_?WT<+9H>'AX>'AX>'AX>'P\\,E82708270)6[4U-34U-34U-34U-34&QL;\nMU-34R,@\"`DLE)=`K`3E24G914?51S`:,*2UDK*RL9&0M+=HI](R,E&!1AX>'\nMAX>'AX?(R`);P#@X.#C`6UL45U=75U=75U=75U=75U=7HND%!0X.XN+B#@7I\nMZ>D$!,TH.1P<.2C-8\\[.SFQL;&QL;&QL;`4%!04%:.]:O;V]O;V]O;V]O;V]\nM6EKOL>]:6EJ]O5JQL;%H[-2(B*Z@H$N,C`:4E)0&C(ST]/3AX>$82$B^.SL[\nM.ZZNKJZ@H*`DAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AU(!!P>IJ=G9V=DK*]#0839;6VMK\nMHL_/SWY^-C8V[NX1J:FIJ:FI=77`%%=7%,`X=76>GIYUP%L4%!046\\`X=61D\nM9*RL[.RQ[UI:6K$=(O&LK&0M,#\",!LQ145%1S#>4-W9VO'5UGIYX`0%X>'AX\nM>)YX>'AX>'B>J75U.(>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'Y.2AH:&AH:&AH:&AH>3D\nMG)R'AX>'AX>'HA1;6\\#`.#@XP%L45U=75U=75U=75U=7\nM5Q046\\#`6Q17XN+B#@X%Z>GI!`3-*#D<'\"@HS<[.SFQL;&QL;&QL;&P%!04%\nM:+%:O;V]O;V]O;V]O;V]6EI:6EI:6EJ]O5JQ:&AH[-2(0T-#0TN,!I0W-Y0&\nMC(R,].'AX7`82+X[.SL[.XBNB*Z@H#XDAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AP%XGIZ>\nMGIZ>GI[0T-!A827`P%M;%!2B5UI^\"38V[NX1$5E\\?'QU=3A;HE=7%,`X=76I\nMGJEUP%L4%!046\\#`.*RLK/$B[+'OO;V]O;%H'2(B\\:QDLS`IC`8W8*RLK*QD\nM9'5U=75U=9YX`0%X>)Z>GIZ>GIZ>GJEU=<#`AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMG)SDY.3DY.3DG)RS&L5J][VCL[*QDGIZ>GG4XP%L4%%L4%!1;6\\`X=75UGIZ>\nM>`&$PTLE825A)24E)0+(R,C(6EI:6EI:6EI:6EI:6EI:IVCL\\:PM*?2,E,Q@\nM45%18,R4C(PIVBUDK/&LK&1D+2W:*2GTC`8WAX>'AX>'AX>'AQ046UM;P#AU\nM.,!;%%=75U=75U=75U=75Q1;6\\#`6Q175U=7%%LX=77I!`3-*#D<'#DHS03.\nMSLYL;&QL;&QL;&P%!04%:+%:O;V]O;V]O;V]O;U:6EI:6EI:6EJ]6N^QL25+\nMP]0,0T-#0TN,E#'AX7`82$B^.SL[.XB(B*\"@/B0DAX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AYZ>GJEU=75U=75A824E2TLV6UL4%!175WY^\"38V[NX1$3-\\\nM?'R'AX>'AX?4U,`X=75UJ74X6Q04HA046UO`P*SQ\\2(=:%J]O;V]?GZQ:!T=\nM(DM+)?#U45'U+62LK*PM+2UU=75U=9Z>>'AXGIZ>GIZ>GIYU=74XP%N'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'G)RGIZ>GIZ>GIY24E%@8,S,-Y0&C%PPLV3Q';%:L0G(;EO`=76>GIYX>`$!\nM`0%XGIZ>GIZI=77`P%L4%%M;2TLE)24E)24EPP+(R,B`6EI:6EI:6EI:6EI:\nM6EJGI^SLK\"W:](P&-V!146#,E`:,]\"G:+62LK/&LK&1D+2W:*2GT](R,AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX<46UM;P,!U=3C`6Q2B5U=75U=75Z)7HA1;P,#`6U=75U=7%,`X\nM=76>GGAX>'AV=APH*,T$/\\X%!04%!05L;&QL!04%:+%:O;V]O;V]O;V]6EI:\nM6EJ]6N_O6KV]O5KOL24E)<@,0T-#*TL&-S'A'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AYZI=75U=75U=74E)25+2S8V-C84\nM%*)75WY^\"38V[NX1$0%\\?'QJAX>'ATM_(\"`@(']_?W5U6Q2B%!04%%O`P/'Q\nM[!VQ?EJ]O;U:U.I^L;%H'1T=[\"+Q4?51+2UDK&0MVMK:=75U=76>GGAXGIZ>\nMGIZ>GIYU=74XP(>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'G)R'AX`7B>=3A;6V[9V0<'E783$QP<.3F7EY=&1JJJ@`G/\nMSQL):\\@V;FX46ULX=76IGIZI=75U=76>>`&$A(12`0%X)24E)24E)4LE;LC(\nMJJJ`6EI:6EI:6EI:6EI:[Z=H[/&L+=KTC`8WS%%18#<&C(ST*=HM+62LK/&L\nMK&0M+2W:VBDI]/2,AS$QQ&9F9L0QAX>'%%M;6\\!U=74XP%L4HE=75U=7%!04\nM%!1;P,#`%%=75U<46\\`X=76>>`$!`;QV*V%+;M17AX>'SLX%!04%!04%!04%\nM:.]:O;V]O;V]O;WL[.SL:+&QL>_O6KV]O5KO[R5AT`(,0T-#*R4WS,PWS,S>\nMWB'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AW5U=75U\nM=75U=3A+)4M+-C8V-C8VHE=75WY^\"38V[N[0*P$E?'R@I(>'89!+?W]_?W]_\nM('5U=PB45%@*2UD+=HI\nM*2G:VG5U=75UGIZ>GIZ>GGAXGJEU=77`AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'A\\!;6UM;P'6I\nMZ^OKZ^OKZ^OKJ^OKZ^OKZ^OKZ^OKZ^OKZ^OKG)RA@X-E965E966#@X.#@X.#\nM@X.#@V5E1$1$K+GON2(BMK;71D9&JJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJFXV:\\]KR&[`=75UGIZ>=76IGIZ>GIYX4H0!\nM>)Z>)24E)4LE2TLE;LB`JJJ`6EI:6EI:6EI:6N^GI\\;L\\:PMVO2,!C=@45%@\nM-P:,]\"G:+2UD9&2LK*RL9&0M+2W:VMHI*2DIS\\_/@(#JZNK/SRHJ>GI;6\\!U\nM=74XP%M;%!04%*(46\\!;%%O`.#C`%%=7HA1;6\\`X=76IG@%2$[P!84L\"U%>'\nMAX>'A^2]:JZOK4ED'V?'L[.SL:+&QL;&Q[UJ]O;U:6F$K\nM*VX,#`Q#*V',8&!@W@T-WMXGX>'A'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AW4X.#@X=74X.,##PR4V-C8V-C8)\"0E75X!^U#9N$6'0*P%+\nM);.DI*01D&X\"U\"#4U\"#4U'5U=GIZ>>'B>GG5U.(>'AX>B%!04\nM%!04%%O`P'5U=9Z>>`&$Z^OKZ^OKZ^NKZ^OKZ^OKZ^OKZ^OKZ^OKZ^OKZYRA\nM@X.F965$965E@X.#@X.#@X.#@X-E1$1$K+FGN2(BMK8B(B*:?%:$A(2$A%(!\nM`5*$`7B>GIXI*?2,E&!1E(ST*2G:+61D9&1D+=K:+62LK/'L[UJQ[*PPC#?,\nM-Y0'J:F>GIZ>GGA2`0%XGIZ>GB4EP\\/#PTLEJJJ`JJJ`6EI:6EI:6N_OIZ?&\nM[.SQK\"TI](R4S%%146`W!HST*=HM9&2LK*RLK*RL9&0M+2TMVMK:VMK::VMK\nM:VLV-C:JJJIK:Z+/P#AU=77`6UM;6UM;2DI;P,#`6UO`=3C`%%=7%%O`P,!U\nM=75UG@$!A'8K)6X\"AX>'AX>'A^3DG.OKJZNKJZNKJZNKJZNK4ED'V?'L[.SL\nM:+&QL;&QL>^]O;V]O2L!`6X,#$-#*V$WS`T-#0T-WJ$GX>$8&'`82$B^OCL[\nMKJ\"NH#X^/IN'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'A\\#`P,`X.#@X.,!N;C8V-C9K:VL)\nM\"0D)\"0FQ:VY+)6'0*P'#P\\.NKJZ@?]34U\"`@(-34U'5U=3A;%!046P4%[,9H\nM[UJ]O;V]O;U:6GY^?N^QL6AH'1TB!@8&!O0I](P&!HST*=K:VJFIGIZ>GIZ>\nM>'B>=74XHJ(46UO`P,#`P#AU=75U=9Z>>%*$>)YUG.OKZ^OKZZOKZYR`&$A(2$A(2$A(0!>)Z>VBUD9\"W:](S,43<&C/0IVBUD9&1D+=K:\nM+62LK/$=?EIH(BTIE%%1S)2,V:F>GIZ>GGB$`9Z>J75U=75UPVYN;DLE;LC4\nMR,B`6EI:6N_O[Z>G:,;L[/%D+2F8C#=@45%1S#<&C/3:+62LK/'Q\\?'Q\\?&L\nMK&1D+2TM+2TM+2TMS\\_/S\\_/:VMK:ZJJJH#/S\\]A=77`6UM;6T1$1$1$.#@X\nMP,#`.#C`%%=7%%O`P#AU=74KT\"MV$X0K826'AX>'AX>'AZ'DY)SKZZNKJZNK\nMJZNKZZL3=I4'!_'Q\\>SL[&BQL;&QL;'O6KV]O=`K`6X,#\"$A*]\"AH:&A#0VA\nMH:'AH>$8'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'A\\#`P,#`\nM.#@X.,`\"`C8V-FMK:PD)\"0D)\"0D=;DLE86'0T\"LK;FX\"B(AJ7)O4U-34U-34\nMR'5U=77`6Q046P4%[.S&L>]:O;V]O;V]?GY^?N_O[[&Q:!TI]\"DI!O0I]`:4\nME(ST*2DI*2FIGIZIJ:F>GIYU=12B5U=75U=75U=75U=75U=7HELX=9YX`5*$\nMG)SKZ^OKJ^OKG)SDY.2GMHM+:SQ\\?%D+2F,\nM-U%1S)2,*=HM9&0MVBDI+62L\\>RQ6K'LK-J,S%%18)2,C(R>>`$!`0&$>)Z>\nM=75U.'5U=75U`FY+;M34U,C46EKO[Z>GIVC&'>SQ\\60M*9@&S%'U4SL[/'Q\\?'QK*RL9&1D9&1D9&1DHJ*B:VMK:VO/S\\_/SX\"`@.K/\nMSV$E2V5$1$1$1&5E975U.,#`P,!;%%=7HEO`P,!U==#0*RL!=KR'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AZ&AY.2$891B^2+Z^ODB^H*\"@/CZ@/CZ'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'A\\#`P,#`.#@X.,`\"R&MKU`D)\"0D)\"0EK`@)N2TLE)25A86'0\nM@`+(R`)J7\"0DF]34U,AN2W5U=75UP%M;6P4%\\>SLQK'O6EI:6GY:?GY^?EI:\nM?G[OL1TM+=HI*0:,!I24!O3T*2DI*?2,GIZIJ:FIJ:G`6Q175U=7HA1;6\\`X\nM=75U=77`6Q175U=76\\!UG)R>`$!`7AX\nMGI[:+62LK/'L[/%D+=HI]`;,45',!O3:+2TM*?3T*2VL[&A:6AWQ9#\",S%%1\nM4)Z>=74X.,#`.#@X.,\"JJH\"`@(\"`[^_OIZ>GQL;L[/'Q\nM9\"TI](PW45%@-Y0&C(ST*=HM9*SQ[.SL[.SL[.SL\\?&LK*RLK*RL\\?'QV=FI\nMJ:G9HS9KHL_/HFMKJJJJ@(\"`IJ:FIJ:FIJ9E965U.#C`P%M;%%=75Q3`P\"70\nM*]#0`1.'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AZ'DY.3DG.NKJZNKJ^OKZP%2=I4'$61D9*RL\nM\\>SL[.SL[.SL:.]:8=`K`6XN(=/3*V5E98.#@X.#@X.#X7!P<'!P2$A(2+ZN\nMH*\"@/CZ@H#Z'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AS'$9F8+\"PL+\"PL+9F9F9F9F9F9F9@L+I:4+\"V;$,3'$,3$Q,8>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AVMK:VMK:S8V-L,\"U`D)\"0D)\"0D)\nM:\\@\";FYN;FY+)24E86'0@(\"`R`)+T)N;?&HE)24E=75U=:EU=_O6EJQ6GY^6EI:6EI^L1VL9\"TMVF#,8,R4!O0I*2DI*?2,C/2I*RLK\nMGIZ>J75U=75U=:FIGIZ>J75U.,!;HE=75U>B%%O`Y)R3DY.3DH:&AH>3DY.2A@X.#@X.#@X.#@X.#@X.#@X.#@V5E1$1*(N\\=K*1+\nMJJIDHEO`.'5UGIZ>GIZ>VBUD\\>SL[.SL[/%D+2W:VO2,!C=1492,]\"DI]/3T\nM*2VL[+%:[^RL+3\",-U%145%@S,PW-S>4>'B>GIYU=74XP%M;P,#`P%L4HH\"`\nM@(\"`IZ>GIVC&QNSL\\?%D+=KTC#=@]6`WE`:,C/0IVBUDK/'Q[.SL[.SL[.SL\nM[.SQ\\?'Q\\?'L[.SL=77`=75UV:D'695260<'J=G91JJJJJJJ@X.F@Z:#@Z:F\nMIB4XP%L4HE=75Q1+;DL\":S;9!U)2`8>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AZ'DY.3DG.NKJZNK\nMZ^N=60M+61DK/'L[.SQ\\?'Q[,:QT-`K*P+4T]-*`41$1&5E965E\nM965E965P<'!(2$A(OKZ@H*\"@/CZ@/CZ'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>',3$Q,3$Q\nM,8>'AX>',3$Q,<3$Q&9F\"PNE1T??W]_?W]]Z>M_?1T='I:6EI4='1T='W]_?\nMWT='1T='I:6E\"PMFQ,0QAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AVMK:\\C(\nMR,C(R&[(U-0)\"0G/S\\C(`@)N;FYN;DM+)25A8270@(\"`@`)+8=#0824E)24E\nM=75UJ9Z>=77`P+3E9*RL\\>S&:+&QL<%HL>]^6EI:6EI^L1WL\\:QD+6!@8%',\nME(ST*2F,C(P&!@:,*P%XGG5U=75U=75U=:F>GIZ>=3A;%%=75U?/SZ);6\\`X\nM=9YX`:OKZYSDH8.#@X.#H:&AH:&AH:&AH:&AH:&A@X.#@X.#@X.#@X.#@X.#\nM@X.#965E1$1*(GXB2V1DFMK:HA1;P#AU=75U==HM9*SL[&BQ:&AH[.RL9\"TM\nMVMHI]/0&S/5@E(R,C(ST*2VL[+%:[QWQ9-J,E%%1S`:,*2GT])B8F)CT=75U\nM=3C`6Q04%%M;6Q175U=7@(\"`IZ=HQL8=[.SL\\:PMVBF,!LQ14=3C`P,!U=75UJ:FIJ0=94@?9\nMHZ-&1D;N[NX'@X.#@Z:FIJ8EPP+(R,C(R,_/S^K/SZ(VV:E94EG9=5L4HE>'\nMAX>'AX.AH>3DG.OKJZNKZ^NJ2TM+2UD9*SQ\\?&LK*RL\\>SL*RLK\nM*P+4U,A*`4I*2D1$1$1$1$1$1$1$1'!P<'!P2$AJH*`^/CX^/H>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nM,<1F\"Z6E1T='W]_?W]_?W]]Z>BHJN[M>7EY>`P,#`YF9F9D#`P->7EY>7EZ[\nMN[M>7EY>7EY>7EY>7KN[N[N[*BIZWT='I:4+9F;$,3$QAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AVMK:VMK:VO(R&[(U-2`S\\_/U,@\"`FYN2TM+)25AT-!A86%A\nM@(\"`JJI+)25A825+)24E=76IGIZ>GG5U=;0M+2UD\\>SL:+&Q:$U-:.]^6EI^\nM?EI^L1WL[/%D9\"T&-V#U43<&C(R,C(R,!@&>GIZ>GIZ>J:F>GIYU=75U=75U\nM-FMK:\\_/S\\_/HEM;P,`X=9YX`81XJ75U=75U=75UJ9Z>GIYU=75U.%L4;&QL\nM55555>Z#@X.#@X.#@X.#@X-E965E1$1*(K'LK\"W:,#`PHA1;6\\#`.#BLK*RL\nM\\>QHL>_O[[&Q:,;LK&1D+60M+=HIC)1@45',E`:,]-ID[+%:6K'L\\2TPC,Q1\nM-_0M9&0M+=HPVMHMI*1DP%M;%!04%%M;%%=75U=75U>`:,;&'>SL[.SQK&0M\nM*?2,-V#U8#<&=@$K:FJDI*2NKJZNB(CJ77`\nMP,`X=75UJ9Z>GIYX`0&\\A\"O0V3:JJJJJ-C:CHS9N;FYN2VX\"R,C4U-3(;FLV\nMV0>54I59!]G9-EMKS\\_/S\\_/SZ:F@Z'DY.2==K:VBTM\nM9*RLK*QD9&1D9*SQ*RLKT,C(R`)N2DI*2DI*2D1$1$1$1$1$1$1E965$1'!J\nM:FH^:IN;/H>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AXGHJ*BJ[NUY>7@,#`P,#`P.9/3W2TG%Q&1D9&;\"PL+\"P\nM4U-34U.PL!D9&1EQ<7'2TM+2TM+2TM+2TCT]/3V9F0->7KLJ>M_?1Z4+\"PL+\nM9F9FQ#&'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AVMK&QL;&VMK:P+(U%?(R'\\\"`FY+\nM2TM+D)\"086%A86$K*RL``*(4JJJJ1B5A)25+)6$E=76IGIYXGIZI=9/:VMHM\nMK/'LQF@='4U-:+%:6EI:6EI^L1WQ\\:SQK\"V,!C=147EY>7!PJ75U=9Z>GIZ>\nMGG@!>)Z>GJEU=<`4;&QL55555555555555555555555555555?%H6FBL,#!<\nMC%:,%!1;6UM;[.SL[.SL:+%:6KU:6EI:[['&[/&LK*RLK&0M*8PWS%%1S)0&\nMC\"DM[&A:6N]H(JS:C)11-_0M\\?'QK&1D9*SQ\\?'Q\\?$B%!046UM;%*)75U=7\nM5U=7HELX=9YX4@&>=GIZ>GGA2`:EU6Q2BHH\"JJJJJJJJJ\nMJJJJ-C;(R-34U,AN2R70V:D'69524I59!]DV:\\_/ZL_/HFM$IJ:#@Z'DY.3D\nMY#DK,Y5V$U*>VMK:VBTM9&2LK&1D+=K:+62LT&%A)0+(JJIN2DI*2DI*2DI$\nM1$1$1$1$1$1E9::FIJ8D:FHD)\"0D)(>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>',3'$9@NEI4??>BJ[7@,#F9F9/3T]F9D]/3T]/=+2<7$9&1FP\nML%-3[>WMBXN+BXN+-#0TQ<4T-#0TBXOM[>WM[>WM[5-34[\"PL+\"PL+\"P&1EQ\nM<=(]F0->7KN[NRIZ>GK?WT='\"V9FQ#$Q,3$Q,3&'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AQ04%**B\nM%!04%,C4R%?4:VO4`@)N;FZ0P\\/#D&%A86$K`````*(4%,`X=3@E)4M+)=#0\nM=76>GG@!`7B>GE`I*2DM9/'L[.P='4U-QFCO6EI:6EI^L1WQK.SQK)H',U)V\nMO!P<'!PY.9=&JJHV-C8V:,9H:&@46S8V-MG9V=FIV77`:\\_/@,_/HEO`P,!U\nMJ9X!A`&>J75UGIZ>GG@!`812`7B>GIYU=<`4;&QL;%555555555555555555\nM555555555?%H?B*:,(R,!@8&HA04HN_O6N_O[^_O6KV]O;V]O;U:6N^Q:.SL\nM\\?'Q\\:PM*8R4S%%1S)2,C/0M\\<:Q6EJQ[*PM](Q@8(PM\\>SL[/'Q[.SL[.SQ\nM\\?'Q\\?'QP,#`6Q2B5U=75U=75Q1;=9YX4@&>=3A;%%=7`0&$=A.\\A`$KI*2D\nMKJZNKJZ(B-RYN;:VMK:VMKFYN;GGIZ>GIX!\nM`9YUP$I*TU]?7U^-C8V`@,_/S\\_/S\\_/U,@\"2R5A8=\"CV=E94I59V:-;HL_/\nMZL_/SZ)$1$1EIJ:#H:&AESF7,Y5V$U(KVMK:VBTM9&1D9&0MVBDI*=HM2TLE\nM)0+(JJJJ2DK3T]-*2DI$1$1$1$1$1&5E965E920D)\"0D)\"36)(>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX`YF9/3W2TG%Q<7%Q<7%Q\nM&1D9L+!34^WM[8N+BS0T-,7%Q6=G9\\5G9V=G9V=G9V=G9V?%Q<7%Q<7%-#0T\nM-#0TBXN+BXN+BXOM[5.PL!D9<=+2/9F9`P->7EY>NRIZ>M_?W]_?W]_?WT='\nM1T='I:4+\"V9F9F9F9F;$Q,0Q,3&'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AQ04%!2BHJ*BHM345Z(\":P(\"`FYN;FYN;FYN2Y!A86%A*P``\nM`!046\\!U=3C`P,`X==`K=76>G@$!`0$!GLV,]/3:,)JL\\>SL[$U-[\")HL>]:\nM?GZQ:!VL(B*LK)IV$QP<'#DY.9>71JJJ:&BQL6CL[.SL[.SL\\76CV=G9V:F>\nMGG5U6Z)7S\\_/6\\#`P'5UGGA24@&>GJFIGGAX`0%2A(2$`0&>GIYU=5L4;&QL\nM;%5555555555555555555555555552+O[_&SC`:4-\\PW5[V]O;V]O;V]O;V]\nMO;U:6EI:6KV]O;U:6K'&[.SL\\:PM*?0&S%%1E(R,]\"DMK.RQ6EIH[*PM*8Q@\nM48PM\\>SL[.SL'<;&[.SL\\?'Q\\:RL9&1DK!2B5U=75U=75Z);.'6>`0&>=3C`\nM6Q17>)656;R\\`0'0I*2NKJZNKHB(W-RYN;:VMK:VMKFYN=SGIZ>GIZ>GIX!A*^I*2E]?7U^-C8V-7U_HZ,'(-C8V-FYN)25A\nMT-`K*ZFI695260?9V38V-FMKS\\]*1$1$1&6F@Y?NE^Z7EUEVO)4K*2DIVMK:\nM+2UD+2W:*?3T]\"G#2TLE86[(1D9&2HV-C=-*2DI$1$1$1$1$965E965E@R0D\nM)\"0D)-:!UH>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AS'$9@NE1]]Z>BJ[N[M>7@.9F3W2<7$9\nM&1FPL%-34U-34U-34^WMBXN+-#0T-,7%Q<7%9V#P],#P\\/#P\\/#P\\/#P],\nM3$Q,3$Q,3`\\/#V=G9\\7%Q<7%-#0T-#2+BXN+[>U34[\"P&1EQ<=+2TM+2/3V9\nMF9F9F9F9F9F9F0,#`UY>N[LJ*GIZW]_?W]_?WT='I:4+9F9FQ#&'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AQ04%!2B5U=7R-345Q04`@(\"`FYN\nM;FYN`@(\"`FYN86%A86$K*P!;6SAU=77`6ULX=9YX=76>>`&$A(0!`2B4!HR,\nM,\"UD\\?'Q[$WE(B(B'6AHL6AH'2+QK&1DFK.SEY>71JJJJNSL:&CL[.S&QNSQ\nM\\?'Q[.SL\\60MV=FIGIZ>GJEUP!175U>BP#AUP'5UGGA24@%XGIZ>GG@!`5*$\nMA(2$4@%XGG5UP%L4$FQL;&QL;&QL;&QL;&Q5;&Q555555555;!U^:*PPC.',\nM8%%@O;V]6EI:6EI:6EKOL<;L[.SL:+'OO;V]6K'L[/&L9\"TM*?2,-U%1E(R,\nM]\"DMK.RQ6EIH[/$M*8S,48S:K\"+L'1T=:*=HQAWL[.PB\\?'Q\\?'Q\\>P=MN^V\nMHA04%!04P'6>`81X=77`6Q17G@$!`5)2!ZG0:J2DKJZNB(B(W-RYN;FVMK:V\nMN;FYW-SJ75U=75UGIYX>'AX`0%XH:&'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AXBJ[7EX#`YD]TM)Q\nM<1D9&1D9&1FPL%-3[>WMBXN+BS0T-,7%Q<7%9V=G9V=G9V#P\\/#P\\/#P\\/\nM#P\\/#P\\/#TQ,3$Q,3$Q,3$Q,3$Q,3$P/#V=G9V=GQ<7%Q<7%Q<4T-#2+BXN+\nM[>WM4U-34U-34U-3L+\"PL+\"P&1D9<7'2TCT]/3V9F9D#7EY>NUY>N[N[*BHJ\nM>M_?1Z4+9F;$Q,0Q,3$Q,3&'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX<4%*)7\nM5U?4U-345Q1;`@(\"`@)N;@(\"`@+4`@)N;FYN86%A86'`P'5U=77`6\\!UJ9X!\nM=76>`82$4E*$.2C,-U:,,#`M9&2LY>7E;*SQ\\2(B(AWL(O'Q9*R:9)JSERTM\nM9&2LK/'LQNSL\\>SL[*QD9&1DK/'Q\\60M*?2>GIYXGJEUP!175U<4P#@X.'5U\nMGGA2A`%XGIZ>GG@!`82$A(2$A`%XGG5UP%L4$DU-;&QL;&QL;&QL;&QL;&QL\nM;&Q5;&QL;&A^(BV,C\"=145%1L;%H:&AH:,;&[.SL\\:QD9&1D\\>RQ6KV]6FCL\nM[/%D+=HI*?0&S%%@E(R,C/3:K.RQ6EI7%%O`=9X!`9YU.%L4%!045U=75U=7\nM5U=7HJ*B5U=75U=75U=7%!04%!1;P'6>>`%2GG5UP!17GG@!4H12>)[0:J2D\nMKJZNB(B(W-RYN;FYN;FYN;G=75U=76IG@%24@T-#0WKG)SK\nMZ^NA@V5$2E]*7U]?7U]?7XU?Z.A-3>7EY4U-34W.50'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>',<1F\"Z5'1]]Z*KL#\nMF3W2TG%Q&1FP4^WMBXN+-#0T-#0TQ<7%Q<7%Q<7%Q<5G9P\\/3$Q,#P\\/#TQ,\nM3$Q,3`],3`\\/#P]G9P\\/#P\\/3$Q,3$Q,3$Q,3$Q,3$Q,3$Q,3`\\/9\\7%Q<7%\nMQ<7%Q<7%Q<7%Q30T-#0T-(N+BXN+BXOM[>WM[5-3L+\"PL+`9&7%Q<7'2TCT]\nMF9F9F9F9F0,#`P->7KN[*BHJ>M_?1T='I:4+\"V9FQ,0Q,3$Q,8>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>BSU?/R-34U-175Z(4`@(\"`@(\"`@(\"U-34U-34`@)N;FZ0\nM86$X=75U=77`6\\!UGGC`=76>`80!`0&$.3E1S)0&7#`PLRTMY>5C!9J:9*RL\nM\\?'Q\\:RL9)JLFIJS]-HM+2UD9*SL[.RLK*RL9\"TMVMK:+63QK&3:](R,C)YX\nMGJEUP%NB5U<46\\`X.'5UGG@!A%(!`7B>GG@!4H2$4E*$A%)XGG5UP%L4$A(2\nM34U-34U-34U-36QL;&QL;&QL;&Q-['ZQ\\3`&E-Y@45%1\\>SL[.SL[.SQK&0M\nMVBGT]\"DM9.P=G9V=G9V=G9V=G9V=G9V=G9V=G4+5U=625!;)3`\\T[;`9&7'2\nMF0.[>D=N6Q04HE=75U=75U=75U=75U=75U=75U<4%%M;6UM;.'6>GGB$>)YU\nMP!17GG@!`812>\"MJ:FJ@KJZNB(B(W-RYN;FYN;FYN=S>(12A(2$A(2$A%+KZYRA@X-$2DI*2E]?7U]?7U]?Z.C!34WEY4U-34U-\nM5;10.2A0`2MU=3C`%%=75U=75U=*2DI_`DMN-JI&JJ-&61P<.>[TC(P&C(ST\nM*=HM+=HI]/3T*=IN)25A8=!N!XV-C8V-C8V-C5_H1$1$1&6FIJ:FIJ:#)`J!\nM\"B36G_7>AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>',<1F\"Z6E\nM1]_?WWHJNUX#F9D]TM)Q&;\"P4^WMBXLT-,7%9V#P\\/#P\\/#P\\/#V=G9V=G\nM9P\\/#P],3$Q,3`\\/#P\\/#P\\/9V=G9\\7%Q<7%Q<7%Q<7%9V=G9V#TQ,3$Q,\nM3`]G9V?%-#0TBXN+BS0T-#0T-,7%Q<7%Q<7%Q<7%-#0TBXOM[5-34[\"PL!D9\nM&1D9&1EQ<7%QTM+2/3T]/3V9F9F9F9D#`P,#7EY>7EZ[NRHJ*BIZ>GK?WT>E\nMI0MF9L0Q,8>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX?/5U?(R-34U-175U<4%`(\"`@(\"\nM`M34U-34U-1KU-34`@)N;L.0=75U=77`6\\!UG@'`.'6>`80!`0&$'!Q18#<&\nM!HPP,#`PY>5559J:FIJ:9/'Q9&2:9)J:FIJS?/3:VMHM+:SQ\\:QD+2UD+=HI\nM]\"DIVBUD9-KTC(R,C(R,GJEU.,`45U=7%%O`=75UGG@!A(2$`0%X>'@!4H12\nM4H2$A(0!GIYU=7KLJWT<+9C&'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AUO`.'6>G@&$>*EUP!175YYX`812>\"N8:FJ@H*ZNB(B(W-S<$!`0N1#<\nMW(B(B(B(B(B(KJEU=3@X=76>`80!`0$!`0$!A(2$`7B>GG4X6Q1;%!2B5U=?\nM7U]?Z.C!34WEY4U-34U-5;10*#G-4+0X6\\!;%!2BHA04%!1_?W\\\"`DM+)25&\nM8>Z7.1R5.0?TC`:4!HSTVBTM+2W:*2DIVBT\"`@(\"?RM+T%]?7U]?C8V-C5]?\nMZ$1$1*:FIJ:FIJ:F)`J!\"B36WI^!AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX?$Q&9F\"PNEI:6EI:6EI4='\nM1T??W]]Z>GIZ*BJ[7@,#F9D]TM)Q<1D9L+!3[>V+BS0T-#3%Q<5G9V#P],\nM3$Q,3$P/#V=G9V=G#P\\/#P\\/#P]G9V=G9\\4T-#0T-(N+[>WM[>WM[5-34^V+\nMBXLT-,7%Q<5G9\\4T-#2+BXN+[>U34[\"PL%-3[>V+BXN+BXN+B^WM[>WM[>WM\nM[>U34U-34U-3L+`9&7%QTM+2/3T]/9F9F9F9F9F9F9F9F9F9F0.9F9D#`P,#\nM`UY>7EY>N[N[*BIZW]]'1Z6E\"PMFQ#&'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>B5\\C(\nMR,C4U%=75U>B%`(\"`@+4U-1KU-34U-34U-34U-34`@)+=75U=77`P'5U>(3`\nM.'6>`80!`0&$'!Q18#=6C(R,,#`PY>7.SLZSL[.:9&2L9)J:L[.SL[.S?(PI\nM*2G:VBUD9&0MVBTMVO2,C/3T*=K:VBF,!HR,]/2,]\"DM=3A;5U=7HEO`=75U\nMJ9X!4E*$A%(!`0$!A(2$A(12A(0!>'B>J757$A(2$A(2$A+!P<'!$A(234U-\nM31(2$A+!O>_L+?0WW@WU43?TB\nM7BI'9H>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AYYX`80!>\"N8:FIJ\nMH*ZNKHB(B-S`5)XGIZ>GIYX>`$!\nM`7B>=77`6Q04%!175U=75U=7HA1;P'5U=77E34U-5;10S3DH4%\"T!6LVV9YX\nM>'B>G@(\";DM+2TM+)25AT.Z5'!Q9[O2,C`:4!O0IVBUD9\"TMVMHM9-34U-34\nMC2LET.CHZ.A?7XV-C8U?7T1$1$2FIJ:FIJ9J)`H*\"@J?]8'6AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX<#\nMF0,#7EY>7EY>7@,#7EY>`P.9F3T]/3W2<7$9&1D9&1D9L+!3[>V+-#3%Q6=G\nM9\\7%9V=G9V#P\\/#P]G9\\7%Q<7%Q30T-#0T-(N+BXOM[5-34U.PL!D9&1D9\nM&1D9<7%Q<1D9L%-3[>V+-#0TBXOM[>WM[5-3L!D9<7%QTM+2TG%Q&1D9&1D9\nM&1D9&1D9&7%QTM)Q<1D9&1D9<7%Q<7%Q<=+2/9F9F0,#7EY>7EY>`P,#`P,#\nM`P.9F9F9F9F9F9F9F9F9`P,#`P->7EZ[NRHJ*GK?WT='I:4+\"V;$Q#$QAX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>BR,C(R,C4U%=75U=7HM34U-34U-34U-34U-34U-34U-34\nMU-34GIZ>J75U=76>=G;`.'6>`80!`0&$'!Q18#<&!HR,,##EY6/.SLXP,#\"S\nMLYJ:9+.SL[.SLWQ\\?%:,]/3T*=HM+2W:VMHM*8R,C/0I*?3T*?2,C(ST*2GT\nM*=HM9*SLHE=75UO`=75U=9YX`0$!`812`0$!A(2$4@$!A(12`0$!GK`2P<'!\nMP<'!P<'!P<'!P<'!$A(2$L'!P>CH6L:LVHQ@#=Z?-XS:BGIZWZ4+Q(>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AZF>`80!`=!J:FIJH*\"NKHB(B-SGJEU=76IGIZ>GIZI=77`6Q04%*)75U=75U=7%!046SAU=:FI=75U\nM=:F>>`&$*%\"3!07.V0'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>PL+`9&1D9&1D9<7%Q<7%Q&1FPL+\"PL+\"PL+\"P4U-3\nM[>WMBXLT-#3%Q<7%Q<7%Q<7%Q<4T-#0TBXOM[5.P&1D9&1D9&1D9&1D9<7'2\nMTM+2TCT]/3T]/3T]TM+2TM+2TM)Q<1FPL%/M[>WM4U.P&1D9&1EQ<=+2TCT]\nMF9F9F0,#7EY>7EY>7EY>7EZ[N[N[N[N[N[N[N[N[NUY>7EY>`P,#7EZ[N[LJ\nM*BHJ*BHJ*KN[NUY>7@,#`P,#F9F9F9F9F9F9F9F9`P,#`P,#7EZ[NRHJ>GK?\nMWT='1Z6E\"PL+9F;$Q,3$Q#$Q,3&'AX>'AX?(R,A_R-345U=75U=75U?4U-34\nMU-34U-34U-34U-34U-34U-34U'B>GJEUT\"L!O`+`.'6I>%*$`0&$'!Q1S#<&\nMC(PI,##EY<[.SLXP,#\"SLYJSL[-\\?%Q\\?'Q<7%8&C(R,C\"G:VBW:VMHMVO2,\nM]\"DI](R,]/3T]\"G:VMK:VBUDK/'&6KV][ULX=75U=9Z>>'AX>`&$4@&$A`$9\nM&1FPL%-34U-34U/!P<'!Z.CHZ.CHZ.CHZ.C!P<'!P>CHZ.CH[R)D,#=1#9_6\nMC#`8B8F)B8G)R186%E14DI+5U=75U4)\"0D*=G9V=G9V=G9V=G9V=G9V=G9V=\nMG9V=G9U\"U=75U9*25%06%LF)3$QGQ<4T[5.P&1EQ<=(]F0.[>M]'I0MFQ#&'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AW6>`80!*V%J:FIJH*\"NKJZ(B-S<$!\"YN1#<\nMW(B(B(B(KJZD[)ZI=:F>G@%24GB>=75U=75U=76IGIYU=3C`6Q04%*)75U=7\nM5U=7HJ*B%%MU=9Z>GJEU=:F>>`&$`9ZIP&MKHP@22'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX?%Q<7%Q30T-(N+B^WMBXN+\nM-#0T-(N+BXN+BXLT-#0TBXN+BXN+-#0T-(N+[5-34[`9&7%Q<=+2/9F9`P->\nM7EY>7@,#`YF9F0,#7EY>7KN[N[N[NUX#F3T]/3T]TM+2TG%Q&1D9&1D9&1EQ\nM<1D9&7'2TCV9F0->N[N[*BHJ*GK?1T>EI0L+I:6EI:6EI:6E\"PL+\"PL+\"PNE\nMI4='W]_?W]_?W]_?1T='1]_?WWIZ>BHJ*KN[NUY>7EY>7@,#`P,#`P,#`P,#\nMF0,#F0,#`UY>N[LJ*GIZ>M]'1Z6E\"PL+9F9F9F9F\"V9F9F9F9L3$,3'(R-34\nMU-175U=75U=75U?4U-1KU-34U-34U-34U-34U-34U-34U`%X`2LK*P&$$UO`\nM.'5UG@&$`0%2'/51S#<&C(PP,##E8\\[.SL[.,'PP,'PP?%Q<7%965E965I1@\nM!@8&C(ST*=HI*=K:VBDIVMHI](R,]\"DI*=HM9&1DK/'Q[.RQO;U::.RL9&1D\nM=9Z>G@$#F3W2TG%Q<7%Q<7%Q<1D9&1D9&1G!P>CHZ.CHZ.CHZ.CHZ.CHZ.CH\nMZ.CHP<'!':S:CUWH'6\"F2^-&=,3(F)B8G)RNWK?W]]'I68QAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AW6>>(0!T&IJ:FIJ\nMH*\"NKJZ(B(CGIX!4H2$`7B>=77`P#@X=75U\nM=75U.,!;%!04%!2B5U=75\\_/5\\_/HEO`=9Z>>)ZIJ9Z>>`%24GBIHUM;HP=2\nM4H2$;MF0D!$186%A86$K*U)VO((`*2GT]/3T]\"G:+2UD9&1DK/'L[Z>XN,#`\nM6U=-3<'!Z.CHZ.CHZ%]?Z.C!P<%-34WDY\"1J)`J!G_6!UB2'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>)\nMB4Q,3$Q,3$Q,3$Q,3$P/9V=GQ<7%Q<7%-#0TBXOM[>WM[>U34[`9&7'2/3V9\nM`P,#`UY>NRIZ>GHJ*BHJ*BIZ>GHJ*BIZ*BIZ>GIZ>GIZ*KM>7@,#`P,#F9D]\nMTG%Q<=+2/3T]/=+2TM+2/3V9F0,#7BIZ>M_?WT>EI:4+9F;$,3&'AX>'AX>'\nM,8>'AX>'AX>'AX>',3$Q,<1F9F9F9F9F9F9F9F8+\"PL+I:6E1T??>GIZ>BHJ\nM*KN[NUY>7EX#`P,#`P,#`P,#7EY>7EY>7EZ[N[LJ*GIZW]_?WT='1T='1Z6E\nMI:6E\"PL+\"V;$,3'(U-34U-175U=75U=75U?4U-34U-34U-34U-34U-34U-34\nMU-34U-1V`0$K*P&\\=EO`P#AUG@&$`0$Y.?51S)2,C#`P,+/ESL[.SL[.,%Q<\nM7%Q<7%Q65E:4-SGIZ>GHJ*KN[N[M>7@,#`P,#7EX#`P,#7EX2P>CH\nMZ.CHZ.CHZ.CHZ.CHZ.CHZ,'!P<%-\\60IE%'>GX'6)*P[OAFP[8N+-,5G9P\\/\nM3$R)B7EY>NRHJ>M\\+Q(>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX=UJ1,!)6IJ:FJ@H*\"NKJZ(B(C'\nMAX>'`7B>=3C`P,`XP,#`P,#`P%M;%!04%!04HE=7S\\_/S\\_/SZ);=:F>>'B>\nMGIZ>!Y524@>IV38VHP=2`0&0$1$1$1$1$1$1$2LK*U(3O``S*2GT]/3T]\"G:\nM+2UD9&2LK.SL[\\;/S\\_/S\\]-34W!P<'!Z.CHZ.CHZ.C!P<%-3>7DY\"1J)`J?\nM%Y_6)\"2'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>)B8F)B8F)3$Q,3$Q,3`\\/9\\7%Q30T-#2+B^U34U.P\nM&1D9<7'2F0->N[LJ*BIZ>GIZ>M_?W]_?W]_?1T='1T='1T='1Z6EI:6EI:6E\nM1]_?WT='1]_?WWIZ*BJ[NUY>`P,#`P,#`UY>N[N[*BHJ*GK?I0L+9F;$AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAS$QQ,3$9@L+I4='1]_?WWIZ*BJ[NUY>7EY>7EY>7EY>`P,#`P->7EY>N[N[\nMN[N[*BIZ>GK?W]_?W]_?W]_?1T='I0L+9L34U-34U-175U=75U=75U>BU-34\nMU-34U-34U&O4U-34U-0\"`@(\"`@*\\=@$!*X0385O`P,!UG@&$`0$Y.?51S)2,\nMC#`PL^7ESL[.SL[.?'Q<7%Q<5E96E)]@%Q<7%Q?U$S?,S,P&]-K:*2DI*2G:\nMVMK:]/0IVBTM9*SQ[,9HL;%HQ,3$9L3$Q,3$Q,3$Q&9F9F;$Q&9F\"Z6E1T='\nMI0MF9F9F9F9F9A(2P>CHZ.CHZ.CHZ.CHZ.C!P<'!P<'!34U-K\"V,S%'>@=;6\nMUCZ^(=+2<7%Q&;!3[>V+BXLT-,7%9TQ,3(F)BE\"\\0QAX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX?`6Q046UM;6UM;%!04%!04HE?/\nMS\\_/S\\_/SZ);-MFI!WAX>)Z>GI52`0>IV=FCHZF54@$1$1$S,S,S,Q$1$1$S\nM,W83@@#:*2GT]/3T]\"DIVBUD9&2L\\>QH?L;QSU?/5^7E34U-P<'!P<'!Z.CH\nMZ.C!P<%-34WE)\"0D)(&?]0HD)(>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>)B8F)B8E,3$Q,3$P/9\\7%\nM-#2+[>U34U.PL!D9&7%QTCV9`UXJ*GK?WT>E\"PMF9F9F9L3$,3$QQ,1F9L3$\nMQ#$Q,3&'AX>'AX>',<3$Q,1F9L3$Q#'$Q&8+\"Z6E1]_?W]_?W]_?W]]Z>GIZ\nMWT>E\"\\0QAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>',3'$Q&8+\"Z6E1T??>GHJ*BJ[N[N[NUY>\nM7EY>7@,#7EY>7EY>7EZ[N[LJ*BHJ*BIZ>GIZ>GIZW]_?W]]'1Z6EI0O(U-34\nMU-175U=75Z*B5U=7U-34U-34U-34U-34U-34U-0\"?P(\"`@)_`82$=KP3%%O`\nMP,`XJ0&$`0$H.?51S)0&C#`PL^7ESL[.SL[.SEQ<5E965@HW8!<7]?7U]?7U\nM]6!146`&*=K:*2DI]/0I*=HI*2G:+2UDK/'PAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AQ(2P<'HZ,'!P<'!P<'!P<'!P<'!\nMP4U-34WQ9\"F446\"?@=;6UKX[(;Y>7EZ[7@,#`YF9F9D]/=)Q&;!3[8O%9P],\nM3$Q,B8F)RE\"\\0QAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX<\"%!04%!2B5Z*BHE=7S\\_/S\\_/SVMK-MG9J0<'>`>I!P&56:G9V=G9H]FI\nM`6'0*P`K*S,S,S,S,S,KE783`\"O:*?3T](ST]/0IVBTM9&2L\\>RG[^RL%%<4\nMSL[.SDU-34U-P<'!P>CHP<'!P<%-34WE)\"0D)($7GR0D)(>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX=,\nM3$Q,3$Q,#V?%Q30TB^WM4QD9<7%Q<7'2TM(]/9F9`UXJ>M]'I0MFQ,3$Q#$Q\nM,8>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AXGK?1T>EI0O$AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AXBHJ*BJ[N[N[N[N[NUY>N[N[N[N[NRHJ*BHJ*BHJ*BHJ*GIZ>M_?\nMW]]'1Z6E\"PL+9F;(R,C(R,A75U<4%!04HE=75]34U-34:]34U`(\"`@(\"`G_4\nM`@(\"`G]_`783$[QV%%O`P,!UG@&$`0$H.?51S)0&C#`PY6/.SL[.SL[.59M6\nM5E96\"C=@%_7U]?47%Q<7%Y51]5$&*=K:*2DI](ST*2G:VG6'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AQ(2P<'H\nMZ,'!P<'!P<'!P<$2$A(234U-34UDVHQ@492!UM;6UA@A.SNE\"PL+\"PMF\"Z6E\nM1T='W]]Z*KM>F=)Q&;#MBS0TQ63$Q,3(F)B8F)B8F)B8F)B8F)B8F)B8E,\nM3`]G9\\4TBXOM4[`9<3U>*GI'\"\\0QAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AVY+4H1A:FIJH*\"NKJZNB(B(B-S'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'5U=75U?/S\\_/S\\]K:VMK-MG9V0<'\nME5D'65('J:G9V:.C-J/9G@```8*\"@H(`*RLK*RLK@A.\\*]HI*?2,C(R,C(ST\nM*=HM9&2L[.RGI^QD:G6>SL[.SFQL34U-31+!P<'HP<'!P<%-34V@)\"0D\"H'U\nM@20D)(>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX=,3`]GQ<7%-(OM4U.P&7%QTCV9F9F9`P->7KN[NRIZ\nMWT>E\"V;$,8>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\nMAX>'AX>'AX>'AS'$Q&9F\"Z6EWWIZ>GHJ*GIZWT<+9C&'AX>'AX>'AX>'AX>'\n-------- End of part 8 of 14 --------\n\n",
"yeah,\n\nThey just tore down the Kmart near my house (putting in a new suptermarket). I\nheard that there is a beer drinking ghost who still haunts the place! 8-{)\n\nTom\n\nI liked this one I read a while ago...",
"ON the subject of how many competing RC orders there are, let me point out the\nGolden Dawn is only the *outer* order of that tradition. The inner order is\nthe Roseae Rubeae et Aurae Crucis. That's Ruby Rose and Gold Cross, in rough\ntranslation. The G.'.D.'. is a Rosicrucian order, as are all derivative\ngroups. Of course, real Rosicrucians never admit to being Rosicrucian.\n\nEnjoy the journey!\n --Br'anArthur\n Queer, Peculiar, and Wyrd! :-)",
"Has anyone ever heard of FET-TRONS (or is it FETRONS, FETTRONS, ...).\nThese were FET replacement modules for vacuum tubes. I'm looking for\napplications where they were used. ",
"\nhowever, the word \"pa^ques\" in french _is_ the word for easter. ask\nany francophone, whether from quebec or from paris. besides, haven't\nyou heard of the phrase \"the paschal lamb\" (meaning jesus)?\n\nsorry to nitpick on the more trivial part of this thread....",
"After reading this story about St. Maria Goretti (posted two weeks\nago), I am a bit confused. While it is clear that her daily\nlife is one of probity and sanctity, I am afraid I don't quite\nunderstand the final episode of her life. I am reading it \ncorrectly, she (and the Church apparently) felt that being raped\nwas a sin on _her_ part, one so perfidious that she would rather\ndie than commit it. If this is the case I'm afraid that I \ndisagree rather strongly.\n\nCan anyone out there explain this one to me?\n\nYours in Christ,",
"dir\n",
"Ahhh, remember the days of Yesterday? When we were only \n\tgoing to pay $17 / month?\n\n\tWhen only 1.2% of the population would pay extra taxes?\n\n\tRemember when a few of us predicted that it wasn't true? :)\n\tRemember the Inaugural? Dancing and Singing! Liberation\n\tat last! \n\n\tWell, figure *this* out:\n\n\t5% VAT, estimated to raise $60-100 Billion per year ( on CNN )\n\tWork it out, chum...\n\n\t $60,000,000,000 / 125,000,000 taxpayers = $480 / year\n\n But, you exclaim, \" I'll get FREE HEALTH CARE! \"\n\tBut, I exclaim, \" No, you won't! \"\n\n\tThis is only for that poor 37 million who have none. Not for\n\tYOU, chum. :) That comes LATER.\n\n\tAdd in the estimates of the energy tax costs - $300-500 / year\n\n\tPlus, all that extra \"corporate and rich\" taxes that will \n\ttrickle down, and what do you have?\n\n\t$1,000 / year, just like I said two months ago.\n\n\tAnd, the best part? You don't GET ANYTHING for it.\n\n\tDeficit is STILL projected to rise at same rate it's been\n\trising at, by CLINTON'S OWN ESTIMATES. And this assumes that\n\this plan WILL WORK!\n\n\tI mean, come on, it doesn't take a ROCKET SCIENTIST to see\n\tthat in another 2 or 3 years, we're GETTING ANOTHER WHOPPING\n\tTAX INCREASE, because the deficit will STILL be GROWING \n\tFASTER THAN the ECONOMY.\n\n\tAll Clinton is doing, is moving us to a HIGHER diving board.\n\n Face it. Clinton is Bush X 2. In four more years, our\n\tcountry will be completely bankrupt, and your children's\n\tfuture, so oft mentioned by Pal Bill, will be gone.\n\n\tAnd those of you still deluding yourselves will be faced\n\twith the guilt.\n\n\tWell, , gotta go. I want to be out of\n\there by noon. Got an appointment at the lake. No tax\n\tthere, yet.",
" >specific objections that don't sound frighteningly technical.",
"\n\n\n\n\nYes, I am pro-gun, and yes, I do disagree with this statement.\nNuclear weapons in and of themselves are dangerous. Radioactive\ndecay of plutonium and uranium, as well as the tritium in the\nweapon, tends to be somewhat dangerous to living things.\n(Can you say \"neutron flux\"?) Plus these things have no self-\ndefense purposes. It's kinda hard to justify their use as\na militia weapon when at best they are meant for battlefield use\n(low-yield weapons) or at worst for industrial target obliteration\n(translation: cities and population centers). Not to mention that\nfor it to be used as a militia weapon and expect the user to live\nrequires some sort of launch vehicle . . .",
"I wrote a commercial program called GAME-MAKER (can you guess what\nit does). What we do is have a document protect (answer Question on page x, \nline y), which is a real pain. We also allow the user to register by sending\nin a card, and computing a # based on their name. The system works in that\nwe've gotten lots of registration cards.\n\tI hear that the program has been cracked though. Someone two people \nactually called up my support--one with a question, the other wanting to\nbuy our graphics libraries (right!). Anyway if anyone wants to help me\ncatch a cracker and has the cracked version, mail me. I won't accuse\nyou (unless you're the cracker of course).\n\n--\n Andy Stone \n-\t\t\t\t\t stonea@suned.cs.yale.edu",
"\n\nLarry:\n\nThe subject content IS serious; as is the question.\n\nOn one hand you state that \"things have changed dramatically\" but, at the\nsame time nothing you \"can think of has changed\". Your girlfriend seems\nto want to see a counselor, but you don't. \n\nI'd recommend that you examine your hesitation to see a counselor. It's\na very good environment to examine issues. \n\nThe fact of the matter is: your girlfriend has a different perception than\nyou. The TWO of you need to address the issue in order to resolve it.\n\nPlease consider going to a counselor with your girlfriend. What could it\npossibly hurt?",
"\nCan we assume from this statement that you are >unequivocally< saying that\nAMORC is not a spin off of OTO? .. and that in fact, OTO may well be a spin\noff of AMORC??\ni would be quite interested in hearing what evidence you have to support this\nclaim. \n\n\nStudy Smarter, not Harder! :-)\n\n\n",
"\nI hate to disagree, but I will. :)\n(note: I don't pirate software, nor do I trade it. I simply have met and\ntalked extensively with those who have. that's it. the FBI can tap someone\nelse's phone :)\nMost pirating is done by people who don't use the programs they pirate.\nA cracked program tends to get passed on, resplendant in the various graphics\nand animations that advertise whoever performed the modification(s).\n\nI admit that a large portion of the business world is involved in 'giving'\ncopies of programs to one's fellow workers, maybe taking it home for use\non one's own PC, but such trading tends to be interdepartmental or at most\nspread throughout the business as a whole- how many times have you had\nsomeone walking from business to business letting people copy disks?\n\nIt's mostly a matter of convenience: a person sees a program they want to\nuse and they feel justified in making a copy since \"someone's already paid\nfor it\", etc., etc. (A note: this is starting to change a bit. not much\nthough.)\n\n\nwhat about commercially available copy programs? CopyII?\nhow about programs like teledisk, that can do things diskcopy can't?\nand before anyone disputes this because they feel that those who would copy\nwouldn't know about this:\n after working with people around computers, one comes to realize that\nthe 'average' user doesn't know much. Any computer enthusiast is at least\n200x better at pre-guessing commands and how to use them (can *you* sit down\nand use something without reading the manual?) and it is these people who\nare doing the '20% pirating', not Joe Windows User who can't remember a few\narguments to the dir command.\n\n\nreally? I find it evens out- the online stuff can be read through faster,\nbut you're stuck reading it in linear flow: start to finish, unless you\njump ahead with a search or such. A book, though, you can flip through\nfaster than you can read text on a screen and they usually have a nifty\nindex too!\n\nBut I partially agree: I often wish I could grep something that was written\ndown.\n\n\nwhat if they need to re-install? The idea of a backup still holds- if\nthe original disk goes bad, they're out of luck for about 1-2 weeks, which\nis the usual turn around time for a company to send a new set of disks-\nif they'll do it without a charge.",
"\n\nReally>`?\n\n\nNo, gravity is an inherent system. You don't need any excess information\nother than observations to determine anything. It is possible to objectively\ndetermine someone's guilt or innocence within an non-inherent system.\nI agree that morality is not necessarily inherent (unless you state that\neverything we do has an evolutionary basis), but this does not mean that\nit cannot be objective in theory.\n\n\nPerhaps it can be objective, but not inherent. Anyway, as I noted before,\nthe practices related to mating rituals, etc. among the animals are likely\nthe only ones to be considered \"immoral\" under the previous \"definitions\"\nof the natural law. Therefore, some revisions are in order, since the\nclass of activities surrounding mating seem to pose some general problems.\n\n\nIt seens that you are objecting to the notion of an objective system\nbecause perhaps you think that it would imply inherence, which would\nnecessitate some sort of grand design?\n\n\nI think I have. It is a code of ethics which basically defines undesired\nbehaviors, etc. An immoral behavior could be unwanted, unproductive,\nor destructive, etc., depending on the goal of the system (that is,\nimmoral to what end?).",
"\nAlso in pure speculation:\n\nParity errors in memory or previously known conditions that were waivered.\n \"Yes that is an error, but we already knew about it\"\n\nAny problem where they decided a backup would handle it.\n\nAny problem in an area that was not criticality 1,2,3..., that is, any\n problem in a system they decided they could do without.\n\nI'd be curious as to what the real meaning of the quote is.",
"Alas, we too will have to stop using it.\n\nBrian",
"\tI'm also interested in Mac based BBS, but not in Chicago.\nI would greatly appreciate it if someone could post a list of BBSs\nin the LA area. Preferably (818) but also (213). Thanks. Dan\n\n",
"the\nunuseable)\nmotorcycle\n\n\nWhat happens is that (I heard this discussed on \"Northern Exposure\") there \nis a molecular juxtaposition of the molecules in the battery and the \nmolecules in the concrete. This acts as an attractant to UFOs (actually \ntheir crew members) and they arrive at the scene of the battery/concrete \ncombination.\n\nThen they proceed to SUCK ALL THE ENERGY OUT OF THE BATTERIES!\n\nRemedy: Set the battery on a nonconcrete floor.",
"\nTrue, all you need to define is one statement that defined one\npolarity, and all the other states are considered the other\npolarity. Then again what is the meaning of nil, false or true :-) ?\n\nCheers,\nKent",
"\n Why does the Center For Policy Research pose such unbelievably\nstupid and loaded questions to this newsgroup. What are you? - a\nthink tank, or a fish tank? Every time I start to believe I have\nseen the outer boundaries of your stupidity, you come up with one\nstep beyond. When will it end, man? Can you actually have brain\nenough to dress and feed yourself each morning?\n\n",
"\nI second the motion.\n\nAll in favor?\n\nBTW>> a few days ago, Charles Fee posted the names,\naddresses, and phone numbers (voice and fax) of almost all the 103rd \ncongress's members. This info, along witha great number of cabinet men, etc...\nI captured it, as did many others, I am sure.\n\nWe should single out a few of the people on the list, and bombard them \nwith lobbying against the Clipper Chip, et al.\n\n-nate\n",
"This past week I've been playing with some of the R-D (Reaction-\nDiffusion, not to be confused with RDS or R&D) techniques\nfrom SIGGRAPH '91.\n\nI was wondering what material is available to explain the control\nmechanism a little more. It seems to me very much like a matter of\npicking random magic numbers and sitting back and waiting. Although\nboth of the papers (Turk and Witkin & Kass) were very well organized\nand extremely helpful, I guess what I need is a more basic description\nof the technique, especially wrt the control mechanisms. The tests\nthat I did had a tendency to either turn into blurry mud or become\nunstable.\n\nIs there any info available online? Source code would be great but\nnot necessary.\n\nThanks!\n\n\n-- ",
"[stuff about hard to find atheist books deleted]",
"\nI don't know if this is still true, but at one time Coca-Cola\ntook elaborate measures to keep the formula secret. For instance,\nseveral plants in different cities each made one of six partial\nconcentrates, which were then shipped back-and forth and remixed\nin a complicated scheme so that no single plant made the whole\nformula. By now, I would guess that PepsiCo's chemists would have\nreverse-engineered it; can't be all that exotic. Actually I\nprefer Pepsi anyhow; in about 3 minutes I'm gonna put money\ninto a Pepsi vending machine...\n\nMatt Healy\n\"I pretend to be a network administrator;\n the lab net pretends to work\"",
"\n > Public revelation, which is the basis of Catholic doctrine, ended\n > with the death of St John, the last Apostle. Nothing new can be\n > added.\n\nEvery so often, the Pope declares that some departed Christian is\nnow in Heaven, and may be invoked in the public rites of the Church.\nIt is my understanding that Roman Catholics believe that such\ndeclarations by the Pope are infallible. I see three possibilities:\n 1) The Church has received a Public Revelation since the death\nof (for example) Joan of Arc.\n 2) The Church was given a list before the death of St John\nwhich had Joan's name on it.\n 3) There is no public revelation about Joan, and Roman\nCatholics are free to doubt that she died in a state of grace, or\neven that she is a historical character.",
"There's only one way I know of to tell an AR-15 from an M-16.\n Pick it up, hold it about a foot from your face and look closely\n at the saftey lever. If it has two positions, its an AR-15, if\n it has three, its an M-16. There are numerous internal differences\n as well, but since one would have to field strip the weapon to see\n them, they are not valid in this discussion. So, in conclusion,\n there is very little external differences to distinguish an AR-15\n from an M-16 except at close (very close) range.\n\n David Bixler\n Auburn University",
"Archive-name: graphics/faq\n\nThis message is automatically posted once a week or so in an effort to\ncut down on the repetitive junk in comp.graphics. It was last changed\non 26Apr93. If you have answers to other frequently asked questions that\nyou would like included in this posting, please send me mail. If you\ndon't want to see this posting every week, please add the subject line\nto your kill file. Thank you.\n\nIf your copy of the FAQ is more than a couple of weeks old, you may want to\nseek out the most recent version. The latest version of this FAQ is always\navailable on the archive site pit-manager.mit.edu (alias rtfm.mit.edu) as\npub/usenet/news.answers/graphics/faq.\n\n---\n_john\n\n\tJohn Grieggs grieggs@jpl-devvax.jpl.nasa.gov JohnG@portal.com\n---\nLast update: 26Apr93\n\nSorry I haven't posted this for a couple of weeks, but I was called out of\ntown due to a death in the family. This is reality, folks.\n\nWhat's new?\n\nSIGGRAPH Online Bibliography Project (spencer@cgrg.ohio-state.edu).\n\n\t\tgrieggs@jpl-devvax.jpl.nasa.gov\n\n\n\nContents:\n\n 1) General references for graphics questions.\n 2) Drawing three-dimensional objects on a two-dimensional screen.\n 3) Quantizing 24 bit images down to 8 bits.\n 4) Converting color into grayscale.\n 5) Quantizing grayscale to black&white.\n 6) Rotating a raster image by an arbitrary angle.\n 7) Free image manipulation software.\n 8) Format documents for TIFF, IFF, BIFF, NFF, OFF, FITS, etc.\n 9) Converting between vector formats.\n 10) How to get Pixar films.\n 11) How do I draw a circle as a Bezier (or B-spline) curve?\n 12) How to order standards documents.\n 13) How to FTP by email.\n 14) How to tell whether a point is within a planar polygon.\n 15) How to tessellate a sphere.\n 16) Specific references on ray-tracing and global illumination.\n 17) SIGGRAPH information online\n 18) SIGGRAPH Panels Proceedings available\n 19) Graphics mailing lists\n 20) Specific references on file formats\n 21) What about GIF?\n 22) What is morphing?\n 23) How to ray-trace height fields\n 24) How to find the area of a 3D polygon\n 25) How to join ACM/SIGGRAPH\n 26) Where can I find MRI and CT scan volume data?\n 27) Specific references on spatial data structures including quadtrees\n\tand octrees\n 28) Where can I get a program to plot XY(Z) data or f(x) data?\n 29) Specific references on PEX and PHIGS\n 30) SIGGRAPH Online Bibliography Project\n\n\n1) General references for graphics questions:\n\n Computer Graphics: Principles and Practice (2nd Ed.), J.D. Foley,\n\tA. van Dam, S.K. Feiner, J.F. Hughes, Addison-Wesley 1990, ISBN\n\t0-201-12110-7\n Procedural Elements for Computer Graphics, David F. Rogers, McGraw\n\tHill 1985, ISBN 0-07-053534-5\n Mathematical Elements for Computer Graphics 2nd Ed., David F. Rogers\n\tand J. Alan Adams, McGraw Hill 1990, ISBN 0-07-053530-2\n Three Dimensional Computer Graphics, Alan Watt, Addison-Wesley 1990, ISBN\n\t0-201-15442-0\n An Introduction to Ray Tracing, Andrew Glassner (ed.), Academic Press\n\t1989, ISBN 0-12-286160-4\n Graphics Gems, Andrew Glassner (ed.), Academic Press 1990, ISBN\n\t0-12-286165-5\n Graphics Gems II, James Arvo (ed.), Academic Press 1991, ISBN\n\t0-12-64480-0\n Graphics Gems III, David Kirk (ed.), Academic Press 1992, ISBN\n\t0-12-409670-0 (with IBM disk) or 0-12-409671-9 (with Mac disk)\n Digital Image Warping, George Wolberg, IEEE Computer Society Press\n\tMonograph 1990, ISBN 0-8186-8944-7\n Digital Image Processing (2nd Ed.), Rafael C. Gonzalez, Paul Wintz,\n\tAddison-Wesley 1987, ISBN 0-201-11026-1\n A Programmer's Geometry, Adrian Bowyer, John Woodwark, Butterworths 1983,\n\tISBN 0-408-01242-0 Pbk\n\nAn automatic mail handler at Brown University allows users of \"Computer\nGraphics: Principles and Practice,\" by Foley, van Dam, Feiner, and\nHughes, to obtain text errata and information on distribution of the\nsoftware packages described in the book. Also, users can send the\nauthors feedback, to report text errors and software bugs, make\nsuggestions, and submit exercises. To receive information describing\nhow you can use the mail handler, simply mail graphtext@cs.brown.edu\nand put the word \"Help\" in the Subject line. Use the Subject line\n\"Software-Distribution\" to receive information specifically concerning\nthe software packages SRGP and SPHIGS.\n\nErrata for \"An Introduction to Ray Tracing\" is available on\nwuarchive.wustl.edu in graphics/graphics/books/IntroToRT.errata.\n\nErrata for \"Digital Image Warping\" is in the same directory as\n\"Digital-Image-Warping.errata\".\n\nAll C code from the \"Graphics Gems\" series is available via anonymous ftp\nfrom princeton.edu. Look in the directory pub/Graphics/GraphicsGems for\nthe various volumes (Gems, GemsII, GemsIII), and get the README file first.\n\nErrata to _Graphics Gems_ and _Graphics Gems II is available on\nwuarchive.wustl.edu in graphics/graphics/books.\n\nA list of computer graphics, computational geometry and image processing\njournals is available from Juhana Kouhia, jk87377@cs.tut.fi.\n\n\n2) Drawing three-dimensional objects on a two-dimensional screen.\n\nThe simple answer is, you divide by the depth. For a more verbose\nexplanation, see any of the above references, starting with:\n\nThe Foley & Van Dam & Feiner & Hughes \"Computer Graphics\" book is certainly\na good start. Chapter 6 is \"Viewing in 3D\", then read chapter 15,\n\"Visible-Surface Determination\". For more information go to chapter 16 for\nshading, chapter 19 for clipping, and branch out from there.\n\n\n3) Quantizing 24 bit images down to 8 bits.\n\nFind a copy of \"Color Image Quantization for Frame Buffer Display\" by\nPaul Heckbert, SIGGRAPH '82 Proceedings, page 297. There are other\nalgorithms, but this one works well and is fairly simple. Implementations\nare included in most raster toolkits (see item 7 below).\n\nA variant method is described in \"Graphics Gems\", p. 287-293. Note that\nthe code from the \"Graphics Gems\" series is all available from an FTP site,\nas described above.\n\nCheck out John Bradley's \"Diversity Algorithm\", which is incorporated into\nthe xv package and described in the back of the manual.\n\nThe ImageMagick package (see section 7 for where it is) contains another\nquantizing algorithm which is presented as \"doing a better job than the\nother algorithms, but slower\".\n\nThere's also an implementation of:\n\nWan, Wong, and Prusinkiewicz, _An Algorithm for Multidimensional Data\nClustering_, Transactions on Mathematical Software, Vol. 14 #2 (June, 1988),\npp. 153-162.\n\navialable as princeton.edu:pub/Graphics/colorquant.shar. This code,\nin modified form, appears in the Utah Raster Toolkit as well.\n\n\n4) Converting color into grayscale.\n\nThe NTSC formula is:\n\n luminosity = .299 red + .587 green + .114 blue\n\n\n5) Quantizing grayscale to black&white.\n\nThe only reference you need for this stuff is:\n\n Digital Halftoning, Robert Ulichney, MIT Press 1987, ISBN 0-262-21009-6\n\nBut before you go off and start coding, check out the image manipulation\nsoftware mentioned in item 7 below. All of the packages mentioned can do\nsome form of gray to b&w conversion.\n\n\n6) Rotating a raster image by an arbitrary angle.\n\nThe obvious but wrong method is to loop over the pixels in the source\nimage, transform each coordinate, and copy the pixel to the destination.\nThis is wrong because it leaves holes in the destination. Instead,\nloop over the pixels in the destination image, apply the *reverse*\ntransformation to the coordinates, and copy that pixel from the source.\nThis method is quite general, and can be used for any one-to-one\n2-D mapping, not just rotation. You can add anti-aliasing by doing\nsub-pixel sampling.\n\nHowever, there is a much faster method, with antialising included,\nwhich involves doing three shear operations. The method was originally\ncreated for the IM Raster Toolkit (see below); an implementation is\nalso present in PBMPLUS. Reference: \"A Fast Algorithm for Raster\nRotation\", by Alan Paeth (awpaeth@watcgl.waterloo.edu) Graphics\nInterface '86 (Vancouver). An article on the IM toolkit appears in\nthe same journal. An updated version of the rotation paper appears\nin \"Graphics Gems\" (see section [1]) under the original title.\n\n\n7) Free image manipulation software.\n\nThere are a number of toolkits for converting from one image format to\nanother, doing simple image manipulations such as size scaling, plus\nthe above-mentioned 24 -> 8, color -> gray, gray -> b&w conversions.\nHere are pointers to some of them:\n\n xv by John Bradley. X-based image display, manipulation, and format\n conversion package. XV displays many image formats and permits editing\n of GIF files, among others. The program was updated 5/92; see the file\n contrib/xv-2.21.tar.Z on export.lcs.mit.edu.\n\n PBMPLUS, by Jef Poskanzer. Comprehensive format conversion and image\n manipulation package. The latest version is always available via\n anonymous FTP as ftp.ee.lbl.gov:pbmplus*.tar.Z,\n wuarchive.wustl.edu:graphics/graphics/packages/pbmplus/pbmplus*.tar.Z,\n and export.lcs.mit.edu:contrib/pbmplus*.tar.Z.\n\n IM Raster Toolkit, by Alan Paeth (awpaeth@watcgl.uwaterloo.ca).\n Provides a portable and efficient format and related toolkit. The\n format is versatile in supporting pixels of arbitrary channels,\n components, and bit precisions while allowing compression and machine\n byte-order independence. The kit contains more than 50 tools with\n extensive support of image manipulation, digital halftoning and format\n conversion. Previously distributed on tape c/o the University of\n Waterloo, an FTP version will appear someday.\n\n Utah RLE Toolkit. Conversion and manipulation package, similar to\n PBMPLUS. Available via FTP as cs.utah.edu:pub/urt-*,\n princeton.edu:pub/Graphics/urt-*, and freebie.engin.umich.edu:pub/urt-*.\n\n Fuzzy Pixmap Manipulation, by Michael Mauldin .\n Conversion and manipulation package, similar to PBMPLUS. Version 1.0\n available via FTP as nl.cs.cmu.edu:/usr/mlm/ftp/fbm.tar.Z,\n ftp.uu.net:pub/fbm.tar.Z, and ucsd.edu:graphics/fbm.tar.Z.\n\n Img Software Set, by Paul Raveling . Reads and\n writes its own image format, displays on an X11 screen, and does some\n image manipulations. Version 1.3 is available via FTP as\n export.lcs.mit.edu:contrib/img_1.3.tar.Z, and\n venera.isi.edu:pub/img_1.3.tar.Z along with a large collection of color\n images.\n\n Xim, X Image Manipulator, by Philip R. Thompson. It does essential\n interactive image manipulations and uses x11r4 and the OSF/Motif toolkit\n for the interface. It supports images in 1, 8, 24 and 32 bit formats.\n Reads/writes and converts to/from GIF, xwd, xbm, tiff, rle, xim, and\n other formats. Writes level 2 postscript. Other utilities and image\n application library are included. Not a paint package. Available via\n ftp from gis.mit.edu.\n\n xloadimage, by Jim Frost . Reads in images in various\n formats and displays them on an X11 screen. Available via FTP as\n export.lcs.mit.edu:contrib/xloadimage*, and in your nearest comp.sources.x\n archive.\n\n xli, by Grame Gill, is an updated xloadimage with numerous improvements\n in both speed and in the number of formats supported. Available in the\n same places as xloadimage (contrib tape, comp.sources.x archives).\n\n TIFF Software, by Sam Leffler . Nice\n portable library for reading and writing TIFF files, plus a few tools\n for manipulating them and reading other formats. Available via FTP as\n ucbvax.berkeley.edu:pub/tiff/*.tar.Z or ftp.uu.net:graphics/tiff.tar.Z\n\n xtiff, an X11 tool for viewing a TIFF file. It was written to handle\n as many different kinds of TIFF files as possible while remaining\n simple, portable and efficient. xtiff illustrates some common problems\n with building pixmaps and using different visual classes. It is\n distributed as part of Sam Leffler's libtiff package and it is also\n available on export.lcs.mit.edu, ftp.uu.net and comp.sources.x.\n xtiff 2.0 was announced in 4/91; it includes Xlib and Xt versions.\n\n ALV, a Sun-specific image toolkit. Version 2.0.6 posted to\n comp.sources.sun on 11dec89. Also available via email to\n alv-users-request@cs.bris.ac.uk.\n\n popi, an image manipulation language. Version 2.1 posted to\n comp.sources.misc on 12dec89.\n\n ImageMagick, an X11 package for display and interactive manipulation\n of images. Includes tools for image conversion, annotation, compositing,\n animation, and creating montages. ImageMagick can read and write many of\n the more popular image formats. Available via FTP as\n export.lcs.mit.edu:contrib/ImageMagick.tar.Z.\n\n Khoros, a huge (~100 meg) graphical development environment based on\n X11R4. Khoros components include a visual programming language, code\n generators for extending the visual language and adding new application\n packages to the system, an interactive user interface editor, an\n interactive image display package, an extensive library of image and\n signal processing routines, and 2D/3D plotting packages. Available via\n FTP as pprg.eece.unm.edu:pub/khoros/*.\n\n LaboImage, a SunView-based image processing and analysis package. It\n includes more than 200 image manipulation, processing and measurement\n routines, on-line help, plus tools such as an image editor, a color\n table editor and several biomedical utilities. Available via anonymous\n FTP as ads.com:pub/VISION-LIST-ARCHIVE/SHAREWARE/LaboImage_3.1.tar.Z\n\n The San Diego Supercomputer Center Image Tools, software tools for\n reading, writing, and manipulating raster images. Binaries for some\n machines available via anonymous FTP in sdsc.edu:sdscpub.\n\n The Independent JPEG Group has written a package for reading and\n writing JPEG files. FTP to ftp.uu.net:graphics/jpeg/jpegsrc.v?.tar.Z\n\nDon't forget to set binary mode when you FTP tar files. For you MILNET\nfolks who still don't have name servers, the IP addresses are:\n\n ads.com\t\t\t128.229.30.16\n cs.utah.edu\t\t\t128.110.4.21\n coral.cs.jcu.edu.au\t\t137.219.17.4\n export.lcs.mit.edu\t\t18.24.0.12\n freebie.engin.umich.edu\t141.212.103.21\n ftp.ee.lbl.gov\t\t128.3.112.20\n ftp.uu.net\t\t\t137.39.1.9 or 192.48.96.9\n gis.mit.edu\t\t\t18.80.1.118\n gondwana.ecr.mu.oz.au\t128.250.70.62\n karazm.math.uh.edu\t\t129.7.7.6\n marsh.cs.curtin.edu.au\t134.7.1.1\n nic.funet.fir\t\t128.214.6.100\n ftp.ncsa.uiuc.edu\t\t141.142.20.50\n nl.cs.cmu.edu\t\t128.2.222.56\n pit-manager.mit.edu\t\t18.172.1.27\n pprg.eece.unm.edu\t\t129.24.24.10\n princeton.edu\t\t128.112.128.1\n sdsc.edu\t\t\t132.249.20.22\n ucbvax.berkeley.edu\t\t128.32.133.1\n venera.isi.edu\t\t128.9.0.32\n weedeater.math.yale.edu\t128.36.23.17\n wuarchive.wustl.edu\t\t128.252.135.4\n zamenhof.cs.rice.edu\t128.42.1.75\n\nPlease do *not* post or mail messages saying \"I can't FTP, could someone\nmail this to me?\" There are a number of automated mail servers that will\nsend you things like this in response to a message. See item 13 below for\ndetails on some.\n\nAlso, the newsgroup alt.graphics.pixutils is specifically for discussion\nof software like this. You may find useful information there.\n\n\n8) Format documents for TIFF, IFF, BIFF, NFF, OFF, FITS, etc.\n\nYou almost certainly don't need these. Read the above item 7 on free\nimage manipulation software. Get one or more of these packages and\nlook through them. Chances are excellent that the image converter you\nwere going to write is already there. But if you still want one of the\nformat documents, many such files are available by anonymous ftp from\nzamenhof.cs.rice.edu in directory pub/graphics.formats.\n\nThese files were collected off the net and are believed to be correct.\nThis archive includes pixel formats, and two- and three-dimensional object\nformats. The future of this archive is uncertain at the moment, as Mark\nHall will apparently no longer be maintaining it.\n\nA second graphics file format archive is now being actively maintained\nby Quincey Koziol (koziol@ncsa.uiuc.edu). The latest version exists at\nftp.ncsa.uiuc.edu in /misc/file.formats/graphics.formats. Apparently,\nneither of these is complete, you might want to check both.\n\nFITS stands for Flexible Image Transport System. It's a file format most\noften used in astronomy. Despite the name, it can contain not only images\nbut other things as well. There is a regular monthly FITS basics and\ninformation posting on sci.astro.fits - read it if you want to know more.\n\n\n\n9) Converting between vector formats.\n\nA lot of people ask about converting from HPGL to PostScript, or MacDraw\nto CGM, or whatever. It is important to understand that this is a very\ndifferent problem from the image format conversions in item 7. Converting\none image format to another is a fairly easy problem, since once you\nget past all the file header junk, a pixel is a pixel -- the basic objects\nare the same for all image formats. This is not so for vector formats.\nThe basic objects -- circles, ellipses, drop-shadowed pattern-filled\nround-cornered rectangles, etc. -- vary from one format to another.\nExcept in extremely restricted cases, it is simply not possible to do\na one-to-one conversion between vector formats.\n\nThere is software for converting to and from CGM files on ftp.psc.edu. The\ncontributor states that it runs on Unix, MS-Windows, and possibly the Mac.\nA better, more specific blurb would be most welcome.\n\nOn the other hand, it is quite possible to do a close approximation,\nrendering an image from one format using the primitives from another.\nAs far as I know, no one has put together a general toolkit of such\nconverters, but two different HPGL to PostScript converters have been\nposted to comp.sources.misc. Check the index on your nearest archive\nsite.\n\nA related frequent question is how to convert from some vector format\nto a bitmapped image - from PostScript to Sun raster format, or HPGL to\nX11 bitmap. For example, some of the commercial PostScript clones for\nPC's allow you to render to a disk file as well as a printer. Also,\nthe PostScript interpreters in the NeXT box and in Sun's X11/NeWs can\nbe used to render to a file if you're clever. But in general, the\nanswer is no. However, if someone were to put together a vector to\nvector conversion toolkit, adding a vector to raster converter would be\ntrivial.\n\nGNU ghostscript (from the FSF - current version 2.5.2) includes\ndrivers for both ppm and gif format files, thus it can be used as\na PostScript to ppm or a PostScript to GIF filter. (It implements\nessentially all of PostScript level 1 and alot of Display PostScript\nand level 2).\n\n\n10) How to get Pixar films.\n\nThe various John Lasseter / Pixar computer animated shorts are available\non video tape. You can order them from Direct Cinema Limited:\n\n Film Individual Price Institutional Price\n Luxo, Jr.\t\t\t\t$14.95\t\t\t$50.00\n Red's Dream\t\t\t\t$19.95\t\t\t$75.00\n Tin Toy\t\t\t\t$24.95\t\t\t$75.00\n Knickknack\t\t\t\t$24.95\t\t\t$75.00\n Luxo, Jr./Red's Dream/Tin Toy\t$39.95\t\t\t$100.00\n\nAll tapes are on 1/2\" VHS NTSC. Add $10/tape for PAL format. Also\navailable:\n\n Tin Toy T-shirt\t\t\t$15.00\n Knickknack 3D T-shirt\t\t$15.00 (includes glasses)\n\nFor individual orders, add $5 S&H for the first tape or shirt, $2 for\neach additional tape or shirt. For institutional orders, add $5 S&H\nfor the first tape, $3 for each additional tape. Foreign shipping, add\n$3/tape or shirt. Call 800-525-0000 (213-396-4774 international,\n213-396-3233 FAX) to charge to your credit card. Call first to verify\nprices and availability. Or, just write to:\n\n Direct Cinema Limited\n 1749 14th Street\n Santa Monica, CA 90404-4342\n\nAllan Braunsdorf has this to say:\n\nAt SIGGRAPH they were selling a tape with all four shorts\nfor $25. That was a sale price. You can get it for slightly\nmore than that normally. ($35 maybe.) I believe it's\navailable from RenderMan Retail (at Pixar's address).\n\n Pixar\n 1001 West Cutting Blvd.\n Richmond, CA. 94804\n (510) 236-4000 \n (510) 236-0388 (FAX)\n\nYou can obtain a video directly from Pixar which contains \"Luxo, Jr.\", \"Red's\nDream\", \"Tin Toy\" and \"Knicknack\" for $25.00, plus $2.50 for shipping. They\nwill take your order over the phone or via FAX with a major credit card. I \nordered mine just last week and received it several days later. Don't expect \nto be able to rent a copy from your local video store. According to the license\nagreement printed on the back cover of the case, it cannot be rented.\n\n\n11) How do I draw a circle as a Bezier (or B-spline) curve?\n\nThe short answer is, \"You can't.\" Unless you use a rational spline you\ncan only approximate a circle. The approximation may look acceptable,\nbut it is sensitive to scale. Magnify the scale and the error of\napproximation magnifies. Deviations from circularity that were not\nvisible in the small can become glaring in the large. If you want to\ndo the job right, consult the article:\n\n \"A Menagerie of Rational B-Spline Circles\"\n by Leslie Piegl and Wayne Tiller\n in IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, volume 9, number 9,\n September, 1989, pages 48-56.\n\nFor rough, non-rational approximations, consult the book:\n\n Computational Geometry for Design and Manufacture\n by I. D. Faux and M. J. Pratt,\n Ellis Horwood Publishers, Halsted Press, John Wiley 1980.\n\nFor the best known non-rational approximations, consult the article:\n\n \"Good Approximation of Circles by Curvature-continuous Bezier Curves\"\n by Tor Dokken, Morten Daehlen, Tom Lyche, and Knut Morken\n in Computer Aided Geometric Design, volume 7, numbers 1-4 (combined),\n June, 1990, pages 33-41 [Elsevier Science Publishers (North-Holland)]\n\n\n12) How to order standards documents.\n\nThe American National Standards Institute sells ANSI standards, and also\nISO (international) standards. Their sales office is at 1-212-642-4900,\nmailing address is 1430 Broadway, NY NY 10018. It helps if you have the\ncomplete name and number.\n\nSome useful numbers to know:\n\nCGM (Computer Graphics Metafile) is ISO 8632-4 (1987). GKS (Graphical\nKernel System) is ANSI X3.124-1985. PHIGS (Programmer's Hierarchical\nInteractive Graphics System) is ANSI X3.144-1988. IGES is ASME/ANSI\nY14.26M-1987. Language bindings are often separate but related numbers;\nfor example, the GKS FORTRAN binding is X3.124.1-1985.\n\nStandards-in-progress are made available at key milestones to solicit\ncomments from the graphical public (this includes you!). ANSI can let\nyou know where to order them; most are available from Global Engineering\nat 1-800-854-7179.\n\n\n13) How to FTP by email.\n\nThere are a number of sites that archive the Usenet sources newsgroups\nand make them available via an email query system. You send a message\nto an automated server saying something like \"send comp.sources.unix/fbm\",\nand a few hours or days later you get the file in the mail.\n\nIn addition, there is at least one FTP-by-mail server. Send mail to\nftpmail@decwrl.dec.com saying \"help\" and it will tell you how to use\nit. Note that this service has at times been turned off due to abuse.\n\n\n14) How to tell whether a point is within a planar polygon.\n\nConsider a ray originating at the point of interest and continuing to\ninfinity. If it crosses an odd number of polygon edges along the way,\nthe point is within the polygon. If the ray crosses an even number of\nedges, the point is either outside the polygon, or within an interior\nhole formed from intersecting polygon edges. This idea is known in\nthe trade as the Jordan curve theorem; see Eric Haines' article in\nGlassner's ray tracing book (above) for more information, including\ntreatment of special cases.\n\nAnother method is to sum the absolute angles from the point to all\nthe vertices on the polygon. If the sum is 2 pi, the point is inside,\nif the sum is 0 the point is outside. However, this method is about an\norder of magnitude slower than the previous method because evaluating the\ntrigonometric functions is usually quite costly.\n\nCode for both methods (plus barycentric triangle testing) can be found in\nthe Ray Tracing News, Vol. 5, No. 3, available from princeton.edu:\npub/Graphics/RTNews/RTNv5n3.Z.\n\n\n15) How to tessellate a sphere.\n\nOne simple way is to do recursive subdivision into triangles. The\nbase of the recursion is an octahedron, and then each level divides\neach triangle into four smaller ones. Jon Leech \nhas posted a nice routine called sphere.c that generates the coordinates.\nIt's available for FTP on ftp.ee.lbl.gov and princeton.edu.\n\n16) Specific references on ray-tracing and global illumination.\n\nRick Speer maintains a cross-indexed ray-tracing bibliography:\n\nHighlights of this edition-\n\n i) more than 500 citations spanning the period from 1968 through\n November '91;\n ii) papers from all Siggraph, Graphics Interface, Eurographics, CG\n International and Ausgraph proceedings through December, '91;\n iii) all citations keyworded for easy lookup;\n iv) cross-indices by keyword and author;\n v) glossary of the 119 keywords used.\n\nThe bib is in the form of a PostScript file. The printout is 41 pages long.\nBelow is a list of ftp sites and the dirs that contain the file. It's named\n\"speer.raytrace.bib.ps.Z\" and is compressed at most sites-\n\n Site Dir\n\twuarchive.wustl.edu\tgraphics/graphics/bib/RT.BIB.Speer/\n\tkarazm.math.uh.edu\tpub/Graphics/\n\tgondwana.ecr.mu.oz.au\tpub/papers/\n\tnic.funet.fi\t\tpub/sci/papers/graphics\n\tcoral.cs.jcu.edu.au graphics/papers/\n\nEric Haines (erich@eye.com) maintains ray tracing and radiosity/global\nillumination bibliographies. These are in \"refer\" format, and so can be\nsearched electronically (a simple awk script to search for keywords is\nincluded with each). The bibliographies are available at most of the\nsites listed above, and the most current versions are maintained at\nprinceton.edu: pub/Graphics/Papers as \"RayBib.*\" and \"RadBib.*\".\n\nTom Wilson (wilson@cs.ucf.edu) has collected over 300 abstracts from ray\ntracing related research papers and books. The information is essentially\nin plaintext, and Latex and troff formatting programs are included. This\ncollection is available at most of the sites above as \"rtabs.*\".\n\n17) SIGGRAPH information online\n\n[from Steve Cunningham and Ralph Orlick]\n\nACM-SIGGRAPH announces its online information site at siggraph.org\n(128.248.245.250). This site now provides SIGGRAPH information via both\nanonymous ftp and an electronic mail archive server.\n\nThe anonymous ftp service is very standard, and the ftp directory includes\nboth conference and publications subdirectories.\n\nTo retrieve information by electronic mail, send mail to\n archive-server@siggraph.org\nand in the subject or the body of the message include the message send\nfollowed by the topic and subtopic you wish. A good place to start is with\nthe command\n send index\nwhich will give you an up-to-date list of available information.\n\n\n18) SIGGRAPH Panels Proceedings available\n\n[from Steve Cunningham and Bob Judd]\n\nACM SIGGRAPH announces the availability of the SIGGRAPH '91 Panels Proceedings\nat the siggraph.org site (128.248.245.250). The proceedings are available\nin three formats:\n text (ASCII)\n rtf (rich text format, suitable for many word processors)\n word (MS Word for the Macintosh)\nThey may be retrieved from siggraph.org in two ways:\n\n(1) by anonymous ftp\n change to one of the directories\n publications/s91/panels_proceedings/[text|rtf|word]\n The text and rtf files may be downloaded in ASCII mode, while the word\n files are stored in MacBinary format and must be downloaded in binary \n mode.\n\n Each directory contains a Table of Contents file (TOC) that describes the\n contents of each panel file.\n\n(2) by electronic mail\n send mail to\n archive-server@siggraph.org\n You can retrieve either the text or rtf files. We suggest that you\n first retrieve the index files by putting one of the messages\n send panel91-txt index\n send panel91-rtf index\n in the subject or body of the message. You will get the necessary\n information to retrieve the actual transcript files.\n\n\n19) Graphics mailing lists\n\nThere are a variety of graphics-related mailing list out there, each\ncovering either a single product or a single topic. I have been an\nactive participant in one of these for some time now, and find the\nfocus and expertise which can be brought to bear on an isolated topic\nto be nothing short of amazing.\n\nPlease send me the appropriate information if you have any others you\nwould like to see added.\n\nName:\t\tImagine mailing list\nDescription:\tDiscussion forum for users of the Imagine 3D Rendering and\n\t\tAnimation package by Impulse, Inc.\nPlatforms:\tAmiga, IBM\nSubscription:\timagine-request@email.sp.paramax.com\nPosting:\timagine@email.sp.paramax.com\n\nName:\t\tDCTV mailing list\nDescription:\tDiscussion forum for users of the Digital Creations DCTV\n\t\tbox, software, and file formats\nPlatforms:\tAmiga\nSubscription:\tDCTV-request@nova.cc.purdue.edu\nPosting:\tDCTV@nova.cc.purdue.edu\n\nName:\t\tRayshade Users mailing list\nDescription:\tDiscussion forum for users of the Rayshade raytracer\nPlatforms:\tMost UNIX boxes, Amiga, Mac, IBM\nSubscription:\trayshade-request@cs.princeton.edu\nPosting:\trayshade-users@cs.princeton.edu\n\nName:\t\tLightwave 3D software for Toaster mailing list\nDescription:\tDiscussion forum for users of Lightwave, the Video\n\t\tToaster modelling and rendering package\nPlatforms:\tAmiga\nSubscription:\tlightwave-request@bobsbox.rent.com\n\t\twith \"subscribe lightwave-l\" in your message\nPosting:\tlightwave@bobsbox.rent.com\n\nName:\t\tPOV mailing list\nDescription:\tDiscussion forum for DKBTrace and POV renderers\nPlatforms:\tUnix\nSubscription:\tlistserv@trearn.bitnet\nPosting:\tdkb-l@trearn.bitnet\n\nName:\t\tMailing List For Massive Parallel Rendering\nDescription:\tsame?\nPlatforms:\tUnix\nSubscription:\tmp-render-request@icase.edu\nPosting:\tmp-render@icase.edu\n\n20) Specific references on file formats\n\n Graphics File Formats, David Kay and John Levine, Windcrest/McGraw-Hill\n 1992, ISBN 0-8306-3059-7 paper, ISBN 0-8306-3060-0 $36.95 hardcover,\n ISBN 0-8306-3059-7 $24.95 paper. Comments - 26 formats, no software\n (this is good, IMHO - I prefer books which are non-platform-dependent).\n Questions about this book may be sent to gbook@iecc.cambridge.ma.us.\n\n\n21) What about GIF?\n\nGIF stands for Graphics Interchange Format. It is portable and usable upon\na wide variety of platforms. It is quite limited in some ways (yes, the\nkeeper of the FAQ has some opinions after all), and in fact, I don't like\nit much. However, it looks to me like the most-Frequently Asked Question\nwhich was not previously covered in this list. The following is a list\nof newsgroups and the like where one could go to find out about GIF.\n\nSubject: alt.binaries.pictures FAQ - General info\nSubject: alt.binaries.pictures FAQ - OS specific info\nNewsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.d,alt.binaries.pictures.misc,\n\talt.binaries.pictures.utilities,alt.binaries.pictures.fractals,\n\talt.binaries.pictures.fine-art.d,news.answers\n\nAvailable in the indicated USENET newsgroup(s), or via anonymous ftp from\npit-manager.mit.edu in the files:\n\n/pub/usenet/news.answers/pictures-faq/part1\n/pub/usenet/news.answers/pictures-faq/part2\n\nAlso available from mail-server@pit-manager.mit.edu by sending a mail\nmessage containing any or all of:\n\nsend usenet/news.answers/pictures-faq/part1\nsend usenet/news.answers/pictures-faq/part2\n\nSend a message containing \"help\" to get general information about the\nmail server.\n\nAlso, you could check out the resources described in sections 7, 8, and\n20 above for more information.\n\n\n22) What is morphing?\n\nWarping is the deformation of an image by mapping each pixel to a new\nlocation. Morphing is blending from one image or object to another one.\nValerie Hall has written an excellent introduction to warping and\nmorphing. This is available for anonymous ftp from marsh.cs.curtin.edu.au\nin the directory pub/graphics/bibliography/Morph. There are three files:\n\n morph_intro.ps.Z (PostScript version, many pictures - 1.5M)\n morph_intro.txt.Z (text version)\n m_responses.Z (Responses to morphing questions)\n\nThe files are compressed, so you must use binary transfer and\nuncompress them afterwards.\n\n\n23) How to ray-trace height fields\n\nHeight fields are a special case in ray-tracing. They have a number of uses,\nsuch as terrain rendering, and some optimization is possible. Thus, they\nget their own FAQ section. Note that further references can no doubt be\nlocated via the ray-tracing bibs in section 16 above.\n\nThe following paper seems to be the definitive reference:\n\nF. Kenton Musgrave\nGrid Tracing: Fast Ray Tracing For Height Fields\nJuly, 1988\n\n\nThis is available as \"Research Report YALEU/DCS/RR-639\" from Yale University,\nit's also in the SIGGRAPH '91 Fractal Modeling in 3D Computer Graphics and\nImaging course notes, and (best of all) it's available on the net:\n\n nic.funet.fi\t\tpub/sci/papers/musg88.ps.Z\n weedeater.math.yale.edu\tpub/Papers/musg88.ms.Z\n princeton.edu\t\tpub/Graphics/Papers/musg88.ms.Z\n coral.cs.jcu.edu.au\t\tgraphics/papers/musg88.ps.Z\n gondwana.ecr.mu.OZ.AU\tpub/papers/musg88.ms.Z and musg88.ps.Z\n\nAn implementation of this paper may be found in Rayshade.\n\nAnother paper exists:\n\n%A David W. Paglieroni\n%A Sidney M. Petersen\n%T Parametric Height Field Ray Tracing\n%J Proceedings of Graphics Interface '92\n%I Canadian Information Processing Society\n%C Toronto, Ontario\n%D May 1992\n%P 192-200\n\nAnd still one more:\n\nMusgrave, Kolb, and Mace\n\"The Synthesis and Rendering of Eroded Fractal Terrains\",\nComputer Graphics Vol 23, No. 3 (SIGGRAPH '89 procedings) p. 41-50\n\n\n\n24) How to find the area of a 3D polygon\n\n\tThe area of a triangle is given by (in C notation),\n\n area = 0.5 * ( ( x[0] * y[1] ) + ( x[1] * y[2] ) + ( x[2] * y[0] ) -\n\t ( x[1] * y[0] ) - ( x[2] * y[1] ) - ( x[0] * y[2] ) );\n\nand the area of a planar polygon is given by\n\n area = 0.0;\n\n for ( i = 0; i < n - 1; i++ )\n area += ( x[i] * y[i + 1] ) - ( x[i + 1] * y[i] );\n area += ( x[n - 1] * y[0] ) - ( x[0] * y[n - 1] );\n area /= 2.0;\n\nIf the area is a negative number, the polygon or triangle is\nclockwise, if positive, it is counterclockwise.\n\n of Planar Polygons and Volume of Polyhedra:\"\n\nThe area of a polygon P0, P1, P2, ... Pn, not in the x-y plane, is\ngiven by\n\n Area(Polygon) = 1/2 * | N . Sigma { Pk x Pk+1 } |\n\nwhere N is the unit vector normal to the plane and P is a polygonal\nvertex. The . represents the dot product operator and the x\nrepresents the cross product operator. Sigma represents the summation\noperator. | | represents the absolute value operator. Pn+1 is equal\nto P0.\n\n\n25) How to join ACM/SIGGRAPH\n\nProbably the easiest way to join ACM/SIGGRAPH is to trot over to your\nlocal technical library and find a copy of Communications of the ACM.\nSomewhere within the first few pages will be an application blank.\nFill it out and mail it in. ACM membership for students costs $23.00,\nVoting or Associate Membership $77.00 (yearly)\n\nSIGGRAPH student membership costs an additional $16.00, $26.00 for\nVoting or Associate Members (also yearly). To get TOG (Transactions\non Graphics) it's another $26.00 for students and $31.00 for Voting or\nAssociate Members.\n\nIf you just want to join SIGGRAPH without joining ACM, it'll cost you\n$59.00 (no student discount).\n\nThere are surcharges for overseas airmailing of publications.\n\nACM Member services may be contacted via email at acmhelp@acmvm.bitnet. \nTheir phone number is (212) 626-0500. FAX number (212) 944-1318.\nSnailmail address:\n\n ACM\n PO Box 12114\n Church Street Station\n New York, New York 10257\n\nSIGGRAPH `93 will be held in Anaheim, California, at the Anaheim\nConvention Center (just up the street from Disneyland) on August 1-6, 1993.\n\n26) Where can I find MRI and CT scan volume data?\n\nVolume data sets are available from the University of North Carolina at\nomicron.cs.unc.edu (152.2.128.159) in /pub/softlab/CHVRTD. (Commerical\nuse is prohibited.)\n\nHead data - A 109-slice MRI data set of a human head.\n\nKnee data - A 127-slice MRI data set of a human knee.\n\nHIPIP data - The result of a quantum mechanical calculation of a SOD data\nof a one-electron orbital of HIPIP, an iron protein.\n\nSOD data - An electron density map of the active site of SOD (superoxide\ndismutase). \n\nCT Cadaver Head data - A 113-slice MRI data set of a CT study of a cadaver\nhead. \n\nMR Brain data - A 109-slice MRI data set of a head with skull partially\nremoved to reveal brain.\n\nRNA data - An electron density map for Staphylococcus Aureus Ribonuclease.\n\n\n27) Specific references on spatial data structures including quadtrees\n\tand octrees\n\nH. Samet,\nThe Design and Analysis of Spatial Data Structures,\nAddison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1990.\nISBN 0-201-50255-0.\n\nH. Samet,\nApplications of Spatial Data Structures: Computer Graphics, Image Processing, a\nnd GIS,\nAddison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1990.\nISBN 0-201-50300-0.\n\n\n28) Where can I get a program to plot XY(Z) data or f(x) data?\n\nGnuplot is a command-driven interactive data/function plotting program. It\nruns on just about any machine, and is very flexible in terms of supported\noutput devices. The official North American distribution site for the latest\nversion is dartmouth.edu in /pub/gnuplot. More information is available from\nthe USENET newsgroup comp.graphics.gnuplot and its FAQ, graphics/gnuplot-faq.\n\nACE/gr (xmgr - Motif/xvgr - XView) is a data/function plotting tool for \nworkstations or X-terminals using X. Available from ftp.ccalmr.ogi.edu\nin /CCALMR/pub/acegr.\n\nrobotx (Robot) is a general purpose plotting and data analysis program.\nRequires XView, X-terminal or workstation. Available from sunsite.unc.edu\nin /pub/academic/data_analysis.\n\nXgraph is a popular two-dimensional plotting program that accepts data in a\nform similar to the unix program graph and displays line graphs, scatter plots,\nor bar charts on an X11 display. Available from ic.berkeley.edu in /pub.\n\nDrawplot is a program for drawing 2D plots on X10/X11 windows, SUNVIEW\ndisplays, or HP2648 terminals. Available from xcf.berkeley.edu in /src/local.\n\n29) Specific references on PEX and PHIGS\n\n PEXlib Programming Manual, Tom Gaskins, 1154 pages, O'Reilly & Associates,\n\tISBN 1-56592-028-7\n\n PEXlib Reference Manual, edited by Steve Talbott, 577 pages, O'Reilly &\n\tAssociates, ISBN 1-56592-029-5\n\n PHIGS Programming Manual, Tom Gaskins, 908 pages, O'Reilly & Associates,\n\tISBN 0-93775-85-4 (softcover), ISBN 0-937175-92-7 (casebound)\n\n PHIGS Reference Manual, edited by Linda Kosko, 1099 pages, O'Reilly &\n\tAssociates, ISBN 0-937175-91-9\n\n\n30) SIGGRAPH Online Bibliography Project\n\nThe ACM SIGGRAPH Online Bibliography Project is a database of over 15,000\nunique computer graphics and computational geometry references in BibTeX\nformat, available to the computer graphics community as a research and\neducational resource.\n\nThe database is located at \"siggraph.org\". Users may download the BibTeX\nfiles via FTP and peruse them offline, or telnet to \"siggraph.org\" and log\nin as \"biblio\" and interactively search the database for entries of interest,\nby keyword.\n\nAdditions/corrections/suggestions may be directed to the admin,\n\"bibadmin@siggraph.org\".",
"THE WHITE HOUSE\n\n Office of the Press Secretary\n (Vancouver, British Columbia) \n______________________________________________________________\n\n\n BACKGROUND BRIEFING\n BY\n SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIALS\n\n\n April 4, 1993\n\t \n Canada Place\n Vancouver, British Columbia \n\n\n9:40 A.M. PST\n\t \n\t \n\t Folks, we're about to start the BACKGROUND BRIEFING \non the aid package.\n\n\t SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: Good morning. The \nPresident -- President Clinton and President Yeltsin agreed \nyesterday on a series of American initiatives to support economic \nand political reform in Russia, and it's valued at $1.6 billion. \n\n\t Before taking your questions and running through the \nbasic outlines of this package, I want to make a few points. \nFirst, this is the maximum that the Clinton administration can do \nwith available funds to support Russian reform. All of the funds \nhave been allocated and appropriated by the Congress. There is \nno need for the administration to go back to the Congress to fund \nany of these programs. All our Fiscal Year '93 funds currently \nare available, so in effect, all of these programs can begin \ntomorrow.\n\t \n\t The second point is that this package is designed to \nsupport Russian reformers. All of the initiatives in the package \nare directed at reformers and for their benefit, and all have \nbeen worked out with prior consultation with the Russian \ngovernment.\n\t \n\t Third, the President is determined that we will \ndeliver on these commitments this year. The package is designed \nto maximize our ability to support reform. In designing it we \nwanted to avoid making commitments that we could not meet, and we \nfeel very confident that we can meet all of these commitments in \nfront of you.\n\t \n\t Fourth, I'd like to note the special importance of \ntrade and investment. I think it's fair to say that Russia's \ncapital and technology needs throughout the next decade extend \nwell into the hundreds of billions of dollars. No collection of \ngovernments can meet those needs; only the private sector can do \nso. And so the President and President Yeltsin agreed to make \ntrade and investment a major priority in the relationship. \n\t \n\t They also agreed that there would be a new joint \ncommission on energy and space formed, headed on the U.S. side by \nVice President Gore; on the Russian side by Prime Minister \nChernomyrdin. And the goal of this effort is to break through \nthe barriers to trade and investment on both sides and to promote \na vastly expanded relationship.\n\t \n\t If it would be helpful I'd be prepared to run down \nthe first page, which is a summary of U.S. assistance, and just \ngive you some general background on what these programs are. \nI'll do it quickly and then I'll be glad to take questions.\n\t \n\t The first group of initiatives are humanitarian food \nand medical assistance. This is part of our effort which has \nbeen underway for several years to provide basic humanitarian \ngrant food assistance so that the Russian government can assure \nthere's at least a minimal amount of bread on the shelves in the \nmajor cities. That's $194 million in grant -- that is from Food \nfor Progress, the grant portion of Food for Progress. We'll also \nbe continuing our grant assistance in medicines and \npharmaceutical supplies, and that's $30 million.\n\t \n\t The second item is concessional food sales. As you \nknow, the United States has had a long-term grain relationship \nwith Russia. It's important to us and it's important to Russia \nthat we continue that relationship. The President has chosen the \nFood for Progress program which is a concessional loan program. \nThe value over the next seven months is $700 million. These are \nconcessional terms. The exact terms have not been worked out, \nbut I think it's fair to say there will be a grace period on \nprincipal of six or seven years, and concessional rates \nthereafter for the life of the deal.\n\t \n\t The third program is a collection of private sector \nsupport. We think this is one of the most important things we're \ngoing to do. Privatization and the creation of small businesses \nis the number one priority of the reform government in Moscow. \nAnd so the President has decided to create a Russian-American \nenterprise fund capitalized this year at $50 million. And the \ngoal of this fund is to make direct loans to small businesses in \nRussia, to take equity positions in those businesses. \n\t \n\t The President has also decided to create a \nprivatization fund which would work directly with the Russian \ngovernment in its priority objective of trying to convert state \nenterprises from a state-owned basis to a private basis. He has \nalso agreed -- the President has also agreed to establish a \nEurasia foundation. This would be a private foundation led by \nprominent Americans to fund democratization projects in Russia.\n\t \n\t The fourth grouping you see there in the summary \npage is democratization itself. I think it's fair to say that \nthis administration has given a new impetus to the goal of \npursuing democratization in Russia. You see that we have a total \nof $48 million in programs, various programs. The detailed \ntables give an indication of some of the programs that we're \nlaunching. \n\t \n\t The President is also calling for the development of \na democracy corps, which will be an overarching umbrella group to \ntry to incorporate all of the disparate private and public \nefforts now underway from the United States to support reform in \nRussia.\n\t \n\t The fifth program you see is Russian office of \nresettlement. This is a new initiative created and \nconceptualized by this administration. This is a demonstration \nproject. What we'd like to do is work with the Russian military \nto help resettle Russian officers returning from the Baltic \nstates and other parts of the former Soviet Union. We want to \nmake sure that we work out the best way to do that, whether it's \nwith Russian labor and Russian materials or using prefab American \nconstruction. And so we've decided to fund on a demonstration \nbasis the construction of 450 housing units. We'll be working \nvery closely with the Russian military on this. And I would say \nthat we have a long-term commitment to this project. \n\t \n\t The sixth area is energy in the environment. They \nare two issues that the President feels strongly about. Our \ninitial efforts will be feasibility studies to look into the \npossibility of enhancing their energy production, both oil and \ngas; and equally important trying to cut down on the leakages in \nthe oil and gas pipeline systems, which cause so much \nenvironmental damage.\n\t \n\t I've talked a little bit about trade and investment, \nabout the new group being created that the Vice President will \nchair on our side. Secretary Ron Brown will also be cochairing \nwith Deputy Prime Minister Shohkin, a business development \ncommittee, which will work in all other sectors of the economy, \nto break down the many barriers that currently exist and impede \ntrade and investment. We are also going to appoint a full-time \ninvestment ombudsman in the American government to work on this \nproblem full-time. \n\t \n\t And the point I'd like to make here is, trade and \ninvestment in the 1990s is every bit as important, to draw an \nanalogy, as arms reductions was in the '70s and '80s. And we \njust thought that in looking at this we needed to make a \ncommitment within our own government to have people work on it -- \nsenior people on a full-time basis, because it is terribly \nimportant.\n\t \n\t You'll notice that the United States is going to \nsupport Russia's membership in the GATT. Russia has had observer \nstatus. Russia has requested our support and, in fact, requested \nour advice in becoming a member of the GATT. We think that the \nlong-term goal of drawing Russia into the global economy is \nparamount, a very important goal. And that is why we are \nsupporting the membership in the GATT. We are also supporting \ntheir access to GSP, the Generalized System of Preferences. \n\t \n\t You'll note that Ex-Im has extended $82 million in \ncredit for a caterpillar deal in Siberia, that OPIC has extended \n$150 million in credits and loan guarantees for a Conoco oil \nproject. I'd like to emphasize that we are very close to an \nagreement between Russia and the United States for a $2-billion \nframework facility through the Ex-Im Bank that would finance \nRussian purchases of American oil and gas equipment and services. \nWe think this is a very important development. We think we'll \nget there by April 14th, which is the opening day of the Tokyo \nconference, the G-7 conference.\n\t \n\t Before I take any further questions, I'd like to \ndefer to my colleague, who will review the security assistance \nobjectives with you.\n\t \n\t SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: Our major \nunfinished agenda with the Russians and with their counterparts \nin Ukraine, Kazakhstan and Belarus is in the area of the safe and \nsecure dismantlement of the nuclear arsenals on their territory \nunder the terms of the START I and START II agreements. \nRecently we completed in Moscow three, I think, very important \nagreements that devote a significant chunk of Nunn-Lugar funding \nto three important programs. The first is the program of $130 \nmillion for the strategic nuclear delivery vehicle dismantlement \nprogram. That is for submarines, for ICBM dismantlement and for \nbomber dismantlement -- $130 million.\n\t \n\t The second is a $75 million tranche of funding for \nthe construction of a facility to store nuclear materials removed \nfrom the warheads as they are dismantled. This will essentially \ncontribute to the overall design and the early phases of the \nconstruction of that storage facility. \n\t \n\t And finally, a $10-million tranche of money to help \nin the establishment of a monitoring system for the nuclear \nmaterials as they are withdrawn from the weapons system. So we \nadd that $215-million total to the extant Nunn-Lugar assistance \nwhich has been flowing -- about $150 million for some overall \nsafety improvements for various kinds of equipment and safety \nmeasures that we have been working out with the Russians over the \nlast couple of years. \n\t \n\t So this is an area where we will be going a lot more \nwork with not only the Russians but with the Ukrainians, Kazhaks, \nand Belarussians. Belarus, for example, has just, in the last \ncouple of weeks, received up to $65 million in FY'93 funds for \nsafety, security and dismantlement programs on Belarussian \nterritory. And this was in the wake of their ratification of \nSTART I, an agreement to accede to NPT. \n\t \n\t So we are working very hard with all the parties to \nthe Lisbon protocols, and will continue to work very hard with \nthem. And I look upon these three recent agreements with Russia \nas a very important step in that process.\n\t \n\t Q\t The OPIC funds to -- is that for the field in \nKazhakstan -- and Conoco already signed this deal with \nKazhakstan. Why do you feel now it is necessary -- if it's the \nsame one, why do you feel it's necessary?\n\t \n\t SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: It's not the same \ndeal. Chevron signed a deal with Kazhakstan, the Tenges oil \nfield. This is a new investment project. It's a polar lights \noil development and renovation project, and it's being announced \ntoday. So it's completely new.\n\t \n\t Q\t Can you tell us more about what's involved?\n\t \n\t SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: Yes. Conoco, like \nother American oil companies has been searching for ways to do \ntwo things. One, to prospect for new oil in Siberia, west \nSiberia; and two, to try to get into the business of renovating \noil wells and renovating pipelines, both oil and gas, in Russia. \nThe objective here, obviously, is to take advantage of the \nnatural resources in Russia, increase energy production, which \nwill, in turn, increase hard currency revenues, which is what \nRussia needs.\n\t \n\t So we think this deal is very, very good development \nfor Russia. The Russians do as well, and it's good for an \nAmerican company. And the American government has played a \nleading role in pulling this together through the credit facility \nin OPIC and through the loan guarantee.\n\t \n\t Q\t So it's to search and also to renovate fields \nthat are already there?\n\t \n\t SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: That's right.\n\t \n\t Q\t On that point, should other American companies \nexpect to get administration support for such deals, or should \nthey now go to the Ex-Im and try to get the money out of the $2 \nbillion?\n\t \n\t SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: Well, as you know, \nEx-Im is part of the U.S. government and various parts of the \nU.S. government have been pushing, including the State Department \nand the White House for this deal to be consummated. And we \nthink it will. And if we arrive at this agreement by April 14th, \nthere will be $2 billion in financing available for American \ncompanies to sell their equipment and sell their services.\n\t \n\t Q\t That should take up all of the rest of the \ndeals and their won't be -- and their will or there won't be \nsupport for OPIC sort of deals such as this Conoco?\n\t \n\t SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: There's a \ntremendous amount of interest on the part of American oil and gas \ncompanies to invest in Russia. We think that the Ex-Im oil and \ngas facility, the $2-billion facility, once it is concluded, will \nsoak up a lot of that interest. But I think the interest may \neven extend beyond that. And if so, the government will respond.\n\t \n\t Q\t What's the current year budget costs of that \n$2-billion agreement should it go forward? And is there any \ncurrent year budget costs --\n\t \n\t SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: I'll have to refer \nyou to Ex-Im for that. I don't know the details of that.\n\t \n\t Q\t The concessional food sales -- is there any \ncurrent year costs to that, or is it delayed until the years in \nwhich the payments are due?\n\t \n\t SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: The concessional \nfood sales are from Food for Progress, which is a USDA program. \nUSDA has the funds, we don't need to go back to the Congress to \nexpend those funds. There will be a hit in the budget. I'd \nrefer you to USDA and OMB for the details on that.\n\t \n\t Q\t Can you talk about the Democracy Corps?\n\t \n\t Q\t and the private sector -- how many folks are \ngoing to be involved in that?\n\t \n\t SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: Why don't I start \nwith the Democracy Corps first. I think the administration felt \ncoming into office that there were literally thousands of \norganization, private organizations in the United States that in \none way or another were working at the goal of trying to achieve \ndemocratization in Russia, helping on a farmer-to-farmer basis. \nAnd there were literally 10 or 15 U.S. government agencies that \nhad a variety of programs in this area. And so the \nadministration felt -- the President felt it was important to try \nto draw all of these initiatives together under one group to give \nsome coherence to the efforts and to give some impetus to the \nefforts. And so this is a presidential initiative.\n\t \n\t It will be headed by Ambassador Tom Simons who will \nsoon take up his duties as the coordinator for U.S. assistance in \nthe former Soviet Union. And we're very hopeful that we might \nuse this Democracy Corps not only to draw upon the resources of \nour own government, but the resources of the American private \nsector and schools and communities across the nation.\n\t \n\t Q\t any kind of commitment yet, any kind of word \nyet on FY'94, and any new money that needs to be appropriated \nbesides the $300 million the President talked about?\n\t \n\t SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: The administration \nis requesting additional funds in FY'94 of $700 million. What \nthe President has done this weekend is to consult really \nintensively yesterday with President Yeltsin about additional \nmeasures the United States could take in some of these areas to \nsupport reform. He'll be consulting with the Congress. When he \nreturns to Washington, he'll be consulting also with the other \nally governments, and we'll make a decision at that time.\n\t \n\t Q\t Two questions about the $700 billion \nagricultural money. First of all, I thought it was the sort of \nconsensus that what Russia did not need was more loans for food. \nSo why did you decide to do it that way? Secondly, could you \nexplain -- agriculture has been stopped from making further loans \nfor food because of Russia's inability to pay. How does this fit \ninto that situation?\n\t \n\t SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: As you know, the \nUnited States for a long time has been a major supplier of grains \nand food commodities, agricultural products to Russia. I think \nbetween 1991 and '92 we had extended -- a little bit of history \nhere -- about $5.5 billion in credits, credit guarantees, through \nthe Commodity Credit Corporation. That was the principal vehicle \nto ensure the sale of American grain products. On December 1 of \nlast year, '92, the Russian government stopped its payments on \nthat program. They are now in arrears to us on that program, and \ntherefore, by law, the United States cannot continue that \nprogram. And so the President, working with Secretary Espy and \nother officials in the Cabinet, looked for other ways that we \ncould promote American grain sales. \n\t \n\t And I think we have two ways to do that. We've \nannounced today $194 million in grant food assistance through the \nFood for Progress program. But we do not have sufficient \nauthority to spend $700 million in grant food, and so we looked \nfor a concessional loan program. \n\t \n\t I think everybody agrees that Russia -- that a \nshort-term loan program for Russia would not make sense now, but \na long-term concessional loan program would. And that is what \nthis program is. It will provide, once the final details are \nworked out, for a six to seven-year grace period on payments of \nprincipal. And then from years seven through 15, which is the \nlife of the deal, it will provide for concessional rates of \ninterest -- generally around three to four percent. And so we \nbelieve and the Russian government believes this is a good deal \nfor them because it will avoid the imperative of early payments \nand put them into the out years, but it will also continue this \nvery important grain relationship, which is important for them, \nand it's important for the American farm community.\n\t \n\t Q\t I gather from what you say that this could make \nit explicit -- the Russians' failure to pay the interest on ECC \nloan does not in any way affect this kind of loan going through, \nis that right? \n\t \n\t SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: Let me be explicit \nabout that. We are prevented under the law to from continuing \nthe Commodity Credit Corporation short-term credit program \nbecause of Russia's arrearages to the United States. All of you \nknow about those arrearages. They total about, I think, around \n$640 million. USDA can give you an exact figure. So having \ntaken that into consideration and wanting to preserve American \nmarket share and a long-term grain relationship, wanting to \nrespond to a specific request from the Russian government for \nmajor food assistance, knowing that we couldn't take it from the \ngrant programs because we don't have sufficient authority there, \nwe looked at Food for Progress, which is a program we've used to \ngreat effect in other parts of the world. And we consulted with \nthe Russian government and arrived at this solution. \n\t \n\t I think the Russians are pleased because it provides \nthem with the food, but also gives them a little bit of relief on \nthe short-term payments.\n\t \n\t Q\t Where do those funds actually come from?\n\t \n\t SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: They come from the \nFood for Progress program, which is a program under USDA's \nauthority. USDA has the authority to spend these funds. We do \nnot need to go back to the Congress for these funds. And I want \nto make that general point again: Everything in this package, \nthe $1.6 billion package, comprises funds that have already been \nallocated and appropriated by the Congress. The administration \ncan begin to spend these monies tomorrow. And it's very \nimportant in our eyes that we expend all the funds this year, \nthat we meet these commitments. And we are confident we'll be \nable to do so.\n\t \n\t Q\t How did you arrive at the figure of $700 \nmillion -- does that max out that program, or did you actually \nhave a range from 0 to --\n\t \n\t SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: There's a reason \nfor it. The reason was that the Russian government told us \nthat's about the amount of grain that they needed between now and \nharvest time. And so the idea is that we would begin the \nshipments probably $100 million per month from now until the \nharvest in the autumn, at which time Russia won't require the \nsame level of food imports from the West.\n\t \n\t Q\t I would imagine there's going to be some \nconsiderable envy and jealousy on the part of some of the other \nrepublics because of the size and the scope of this with Russia. \nHave you given any consideration to advancing negotiations for \nthe same kinds of projects with the Ukraine, with Georgia , with \nsome of the other republics?\n\t \n\t SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: Yes, we're very \nconscience of the fact that we also have an interest in extending \nAmerican support to the 11 other countries of the former Soviet \nUnion. We have told ourselves, and we have planned that in the \narea of technical assistance, the grant technical assistance that \nyou see, roughly 50 percent of the funding will go to Russia and \nroughly 50 percent to the other countries. \n\t \n\t In the area of food sales, we have been active with \nUkraine, in grant food assistance with Georgia and Armenia. We \nwill continue that. And I think it's fair to say that after this \nsummit we will go back and look at all of our programs with the \nother countries to ensure that they are adequate and they are \nproductive and they're hard-hitting.\n\t \n\t Q\t Has anything happened at the summit to lead \nAmerican energy companies and other companies to believe that \nRussia is going to be more user-friendly toward them in terms of \ntaxing, legalities, bureaucracy?\n\t \n\t SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: Well, one of our \nprimary objectives coming into this summit was to highlight, not \nonly the economic agenda, but also trade and investment. And I'd \nlike to refer to the point I made at the beginning. We're \nconvinced in talking about this problem -- the problem of how to \nsupport Russia long-term -- we're convinced that no collection of \nWestern governments have the financial resources over the next \ndecade to fuel the continuation of reform, that only the private \nsector can do that. \n\t \n\t We look at our own society and we see tremendous \ncapability in resources in the oil and gas sector. It is a very \ngood match with what the Russians need now, which is financial \ninvestment in the existing oil and gas wells and pipeline and new \ntechnology and new capital to finance new production. \n\t \n\t That's what the Russian government has told us it \nwants to do, and so that's why we have made such a major emphasis \non it. That's why trade and investment was a prominent issue on \nthe first day of these talks, and in fact, figured prominently \nlast night in the meeting between President Yeltsin and President \nClinton. And we're hoping that together we might send a strong \nsignal to the American business community that we support their \nefforts to invest in Russia, that the United States, through Ex-\nIm and OPEC and the Department of Commerce, will be there to \nsupport them.\n\t \n\t Q\t My question is, is Yeltsin in any position to \ndeliver on making Russia a more --\n\t \n\t SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: We think he is. I \nwould note that President Yeltsin's Prime Minister, Mr. \nChernomyrdin, worked for 30 years in the Russian oil and gas \nsector. He will now chair a high-level commission with the Vice \nPresident, Vice President Gore, to try to break through the \nbarriers that currently exist to Western investment in the oil \nand gas sector. We believe we have a commitment to make that \ncommittee an important committee. And we're looking forward to \nthe work.\n\t \n\t Q\t What type of mechanism is already in place to \nadminister the private sector portion of the program? And will \nthe U.S. be directly involved in the tail end of distribution of \nthe actual funds or is the money simply turned over to the \nRussian government for distribution at their will?\n\t \t \n\t SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: Are you talking \nabout the variety of programs listed here? It depends on the \nprogram itself. In most cases, though, we are either working \nthrough American PBOs or American government agencies to ensure \nthat the money obviously is well spent, that the money gets to \nthe intended source. That's an obligation we have to the \nCongress to ensure the money is well spent and that we can \naccount for the money. We have done that in the last couple of \nmonths intensively and we will continue to do it for each of \nthese programs.\n\t \n\t But they are all quite different. For instance, in \nthe area of grant food and medical assistance, for grant food it \nis carried out through USDA and USDA accounts for the delivery of \nthe food. For grant medical assistance, we've been working \nthrough Project Hope which is a private organization. For the \nhousing -- for instance, the resettlement of Russian officers, \nwe'll be working with a group of American PBOs. On some of the \ndemocratization projects, we're working directly with Russian \nprivate individuals and private foundations. We're working with \njournalists in Russia on a media project that you may have \nnoticed.\n\t \n\t So we literally have here 30 to 40 different \nactivities under all these rubrics and they're all going to be \ncarried out in slightly different ways. Some directly with the \nRussian government, some with Russian citizens.\n\t \n\t Q\t The Jackson-Vanik restrictions that remain and \non the COCOM restrictions that remain, can you tell us what the \nPresident has to do on that?\n\t \n\t SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: Well, as George \nnoted yesterday, President Yeltsin raised these as irritants in \nthe relationship. The President has noted that. I think it's \nfair to say we will go back now in our own government when we \nreturn to Washington and look at both of these questions, and \nwe'll get back to the Russian government.\n\t \n\t Q\t You were not prepared for these questions when \nyou got here?\n\t \n\t SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: We were prepared \nfor these questions. We've looked at them. But we're not \nprepared to make a quick decision this weekend. They require --\nlet me just explain, particularly on Jackson-Vanik. They require \nconsultation with the Congress. They require consultation with \nthe American Jewish community. And we're very sensitive to those \nconcerns. And so we'll want to go back and talk to them before \nwe take any action.\n\t \n\t Q\t Is this package designed so that you will not \nhave to go to Congress for anything at this point?\n\t \n\t SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: As I said at the \nbeginning, the advantage of this particular package is that all \nthe funds have been allocated and appropriated by the Congress. \nSo the administration will not have to go back to the Congress to \nseek any additional authority to fund any of these efforts. In \neffect, they can all begin tomorrow, and I know that many of the \nagencies responsible for these projects will begin tomorrow. And \nthat's the advantage of this particular initiative.\n\t \n\t Q\t If this, as the President says, is a long-term, \nlong-haul thing, and members of Congress are at this moment \nheading for Moscow, why aren't you talking about going to \nCongress and suggesting to the President of Russia that you are \nprepared to go to Congress for various things?\n\t \n\t SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: I think we've been \nclear about that. The President is discussing this weekend with \nPresident Yeltsin some additional ideas that we have for American \nfunding of additional projects, and ideas that he has. We have a \nmajor congressional delegation that left last night, headed by \nRepresentative Gephardt and we'll want to consult with that \ndelegation and other members of Congress before doing anything. \nAnd we'll also want to consult with our allies. So that's where \nit stands now.\n\t \n\t Q\t We've been told repeatedly that a number of \nthese items represent different or new ways of spending the money \nalready appropriated. Could you just tick off which of these \nitems represents reprogramming or at least spending money in ways \nthat it was not previously set to be?\n\t \n\t SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: I think that we've \nsaid that these are all projects that either Congress had \nallocated money for through the Freedom Support Act; there were \nsome funds that were left over from FY'92. And this \nadministration took office and had some new ideas about how the \nfunds might be expended.\n\t \n\t We didn't use just the Freedom Support Act funds or \nthe FY'92 funds. We went into some of the agency allocations --\nEx-Im, OPIC, and USDA -- and tried to look for creative ways to \nfurther our programs.\n\t \n\t And example of that is the Food for Progress \nconcessional loans. We had hit a brick wall with another type of \nfunding through USDA. We could not go forward legally, and so we \nlooked for a more creative way to ensure continued American \nmarket share and ensure continued grain sales, and we think we \nfound it.\n\t \n\t Q\t Where, for example, are you getting the money \nfor this Russian officer resettlement --\n\t \n\t SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: That's from the \nFreedom Support Act funds.\n\t \n\t Q\t In other words, all of the money is being \ndirectly spent in new ways, so to speak --\n\t \n\t SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: Most of the grant \nprojects that you see -- if you look at the general chart, the \nsecond chart, it's broken down into grant and credits. And if \nyou look under grants, the technical cooperation projects that \ntotal $281.9 million -- that is almost all Freedom Support Act \nfunding. A little bit of it is leftover funds from fiscal year \n'92. The Nunn-Lugar funds, of course, you know about the \nlegislative history of those funds.\n\t \n\t Q\t cooperation --\n\t \n\t SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: From FY '92? I \ndon't have the exact figure. It was not a considerable figure.\n\t \n\t Q\t Could you tell us please, has anything happened \nhere this weekend that will break the log jam between Ukraine and \nRussia over START -- for START I and II as a result of what's \nhappened here --\n\t \n\t SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: Both presidents, \nPresident Yeltsin and President Clinton, will be discussing this \nissue this morning. In fact, we haven't yet gotten to security \nand arms control related issues. That will be this morning's \nsession. I know that President Clinton will be very strongly \nreinforcing that this is a top priority for us. We've been \ntalking to the Russians and the Ukrainians over the last couple \nof weeks about ways that we might help to facilitate the \ndiscussions between them. Up to this point, this has been a very \nimportant negotiation that's been going on essentially between \nMoscow and Kiev. And we are at the point now of essentially \ndiscussing with them if there are ways that we could contribute \nto this discussion, help to move things forward essentially. \n\t \n\t But in terms of what is coming out of this weekend, \nI don't yet know. In a couple hours we'll know.\n\t \n\t Q?\t Just a follow-up on the financing here. Is \nany of this robbing Peter to pay Boris -- since it's all current \nyear appropriations, have you taken it from anyplace that's been \nearmarked and put it into this fund?\n\t \n\t SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: There are smoke and \nmirrors here, and I think it's an important point to note. We \ncould have given you a page of assistance numbers that included \nout-year funding. We're going to make a long-term commitment to \nmany of these projects -- for instance, the enterprise funds, the \nprivatization effort, the housing effort. And we've already \ntalked to the Russians about our long-term commitment. \n\t \n\t We could have put in really big numbers and this \ncould have been a bigger package, but we wanted to make a point: \nThis package is FY '93. It's funds that we have. And we're \ngoing to do what we say we're going to do. And the President \nfeels very strongly about that. In the past there is a legacy \nthat the western governments, the combination of governments, put \nup large budget figures and for any number of reasons we're not \nable to meet them, we're determined, and the President is \ndetermined, to carry out every single program in this package. \nAnd we'll do it. \n\t \n\t But we do have a longer-term commitment, and that's \npart of the discussions on economics this weekend. We're looking \nfor Russian ideas on what it is we can do to most effectively \nsupport reform. And we've told them that we do have a commitment \non some of these programs beyond this fiscal year.\n\t \n\t Q\t taken it way from any --\n\t \n\t SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: No, we haven't. \nOkay, the question is, have we reprogrammed any of these funds; \nso have we taken it from other countries to pay for programs in \nRussia? The answer is no, we have not done so.\n\t \n\t Q\t In terms of funding, there is no available \nmonies left -- and you simply find a creative way to find money \nsomewhere else. Doesn't that, in fact, support the -- theory?\n\t \n\t SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: Not at all. I \ndon't think it does. That's a particular example, and the \nexample is grain sales. The Commodity Credit Corporation credit \nguarantee program was short-term loans that Russia had to pay \nback within 12 to 15 months. You all know about Russia's debt \nproblem, and Russia was unable to meet those commitments. So we \nlooked for a way to do two things: to meet Russia's requirement \nfor grain. They're a net grain importer on a massive scale, and \nalso meet our objective of making sure that the American farmers \nhave a chance to sell their products to Russia. And we simply \nlook for another way to finance that. And we have legislative \nauthority to do it. This program has been successful in other \nareas. We had not tried it before in the former Soviet Union, \nbut we thought we should now.\n\t \t \n\t Q\t Isn't this really the Bush-Clinton aid package \nfor Russia, since these funds were really first derived by \ninitiatives put forward by President Bush?\n\t \n\t SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: No, I don't think \nthat's a fair characterization. A lot of these funds were \nappropriated by the U.S. Congress is 1991, in 1992. This \nadministration took office and inherited some obligations that \nthe Bush administration had made. But we had a long six to seven \nweek review of this program. We decided to meet the commitments \nthat had been made by the previous administration. \n\t \n\t But we have gone well beyond them in funding the \nenterprise fund, which was just an idea, but the idea had not \nbeen filled out with a program. There was no number attached to \nit. In grouping together some projects and trying to make them \ninto a coherent whole in the privatization effort, I would say, \nis another Clinton initiative. \n\t \n\t Further, we listened to the Russian government and \nlistened to the Russian military who told us that the \nresettlement of their officers was important to them for \npolitical and economic and social reasons. And President Clinton \nhas responded to that. And we are making a long-term commitment \nthat beyond this demonstration project we're going to figure out \na way to do much more in trying to settle those officers. \n\t \n\t I would also say that the President has given \nimpetus to all of us in the agencies to think much more broadly \nabout what it is we can do on democratization, because there we \nhave some experience and some comparative advantage that lends \nitself to the Russian experience. And in calling for the \ncreation of a democracy corps, which is another new initiative, \nwe're hopeful that we can take the resources of the private \nsector as well as the American government, to achieve that \nobjective. \n\t \n\t So I would not characterize it that way at all. And \nas most of you know, I am a career civil servant. I was in the \nlast administration. I'm very familiar with what the last \nadministration did. And I would characterize this as a Clinton \nassistance package for Russia.\n\t \n\t Q\t There's been a lot of criticism that aid in the \npast has not gotten to the people. Is there anything in this \noutside of the ombudsman, that will guarantee that this money \nwill not just disappear because it's being administered by the \nRussian government?\n\t \n\t SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: I think that -- I \nknow that the President and other senior officials of our \ngovernment are concerned that American money be spent wisely and \nthat it get to the source that it's intended -- for which it's \nintended. And so we're going to take great care -- AID and the \nState Department will take great care in making sure that the \nfunds are expended properly and that they're reaching their \nsource.\n\t \n\t I would not that this package is not simply a \npackage of support solely to the Russian government. Some of \nthese projects, especially in democratization and exchanges, are \ngoing to be worked out directly with Russian private individuals, \nwith businesses. The private enterprise support is another \nexample of that.\n\t \n\t SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: If I could just add \na word on this point with regard to the SSD-related programs, one \narea that we've been looking at very, very closely is \nconsideration of actually using Russian firms in subcontracting \nfor these kinds of programs. They would be working very closely, \nof course, with the American firms, who would be the prime \ncontractors. But this is a fine example, I think, of a more --of \na imaginative and flexible approach toward getting some of that \nfunding down to the grassroots level, down to the ground in \nRussia; but at the same time ensuring that it is spent \nefficiently and for the purposes for which it was intended.\n\t \n\t Q\t When would the democracy corps start? Exactly \nwhen do you see this happening? How would get it off the ground?\n\t \n\t SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: Well, the President \nis today calling for the creation of a democracy corps. I think \nit's fair to say that we're going to work out its framework over \nthe next couple of weeks. Ambassador Simons takes up his duties \non May 1st. But in effect we've already started, because over \nthe last couple of weeks the administration has begun to reach \nout to people in the private sector who have come to us asking us \nto help facilitate their activities in Russia. And we've said \nthat we will be helpful. We've also tried to kind of coordinate \nin a much more effective way the activities of our own \ngovernment. We do have 10 or 15 agencies that are active in \nRussia in one way or another. We think it makes sense to draw \nthem together and to focus their efforts.\n\t \n\t Q\t Excuse me. How much of this $1.6 billion will \nactually be spent in the United States by American made goods?\n\t \n\t SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: I don't have any \nfigures for you now, but perhaps we could try to work something \nup in the next couple of days on that.\n\t \n\t Q\t This figure is larger than the figure that has \nbeen in the press -- did this program grow yesterday as a result \nof the discussions, or have we just been that far off the mark?\n\t \n\t SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: No, I think --\nunfortunately the press has been a little bit off the mark, and \nI'm sorry to say that. No, this package -- President Clinton put \nus to work about seven weeks ago on this package. And he was \nbriefed intensively on this. He contributed a lot of the \nintellectual leadership in this package. He contributed a lot of \nthe ideas in the package. And I think it's fair to say that we \nhad this rough package worked out about two weeks ago. We have \nbeen refining it ever since. We spent a couple of days last week \ngoing over it with the Russian government, both the embassy in \nWashington and the government in Moscow through our own embassy. \nAnd so it's been evolving. But this particular package has been \ntogether for about two weeks.\n\t \n\t Q\t Where is Yeltsin's input into this then? There \nwas so much talk before about the President wanted to get \nYeltsin's views about specifically what was needed and so forth. \nIs that in the out years?\n\t \n\t SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: No, it's both. \nPresident Yeltsin has on several occasions told us, for instance, \nthat support for the creation of private businesses is important \nto him; that the resettlement of Russian military officers is \nimportant; and that first and foremost the effort to privatize \nthe state industries is important to them. \n\t \n\t And so what we did was to try to make those the \ncenterpiece of our technical assistance part o the package. We \nlistened to him. On the privatization effort, we have been \nworking with the Russian government for months on this trying to \nwork out all the details. So the Russian government on most of \nthese programs was involved every step of the way. \n\t \n\t But let me get at the other part of your question. \nThe President is also using this weekend to talk about a broader \nset of initiatives that we might undertake. And we're looking \nfor his ideas. The President has brought his own ideas to the \ntable -- for instance, on energy and the environment and in \nhousing. But we're looking for Russian ideas not. We need to \nconsult with the Congress; and we need to consult with the other \nallied governments that are also active.\n\t \n\t Q\t There's essentially nothing that happened in \nthe last day and a half that measurably altered the package that \nyou came in with?\n\t \n\t SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: This particular \npackage, as I said, was worked out and was ready about two weeks \nago. We have since then consulted with the Russian government on \nthe final stages of its development, and so this weekend we've \nprimarily talked about future, about what more the United States \nand other Western countries can do to support reform in Russia, \nwhich is our base objective here.\n\t \n\t Q\t I noticed that you -- that money appropriated \nto train bankers and businessmen and officers. Can you tell me \nwhat about job training for workers who are displaced by \nprivatization?\n\t \n\t SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: You're right; we \nhave a program to train Russian -- young Russians in banking and \nfinancial services in the United States. Part of the housing \ninitiative, it's not just to build housing units, it's to retrain \nRussian officers who are retiring into other professions.\n\t \n\t Q\t money for job training for workers whose \njobs are disappearing because of privatization --\n\t \n\t SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: We have not yet \nallocated any money for that.\n\t \n\t Q\t Why not?\n\t \n\t Q\t of the $6 million is going to build 450 \nhousing units. Isn't that a lot of money per unit given what the \nWestern dollar will buy in the former Soviet Union?\n\t \n\t SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: If you want to do \nhousing the right way, it's not just the building the framework \nof a house, you've got to think about all the utilities. You've \ngot to think about the purchase of land. You've got to think \nabout sewage and gas and electricity and so forth. And it's also \nretraining. It's not enough to put retired -- an officer coming \nout of -- Riga or Tallin or Vilnius in a house in western Russia. \nWe think we have an obligation to try to retrain those officers \nas well. This is responding to a request from the Russian \ngovernment.\n\t \n\t Q\t of the $6 million will go to retrain --\n\t \n\t SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: That's right.\n\t \n\t Q\t Are you talking about apartment buildings or \nsingle --\n\t \n\t SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: We're talking about \nsingle, individual dwellings.\n\t \n\t Q\t You're saying that only 450 families will be \nserved by this?\n\t \n\t SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: What I want to -- I \nthought I pointed out earlier, this is a demonstration project. \nWhat we didn't want to do -- given the experience that the \nGermans and the Turks and the Italians have had in building \nhousing in western Russian, we did not want to leap into it with \na huge amount of money. What we want to do is work over the next \ncouple of months and try to figure out with American \norganizations in the private sector the best way to get this job \ndone. \n\t \n\t I noted that we have a long-term commitment to that. \nAnd so I would expect that we would put a lot more money into \nthis in the future . But we want to do it wisely; we want to \nspend the money wisely.\n\t \n\t Q\t What is it about this program that convinces \nyou that it will protect Russia's reforms and that Russia will be \nin a position to may back the money they're supposed to pay back, \nespecially considering their other debt problem?\n\t \n\t SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: Well, look, I think \nit's important to note that the United States on its own does not \nhave the capability to fuel a continuation of Russian reform. \nIt's got to be a collective Western effort, and we're looking to \nour allies to do more as well. But beyond that, it's really what \nthe Russians do that is going to decide the fate of reform. We \ncan simply play a role, and we feel we have an obligation to do \nso, which is consistent with our national interests.\n\t \n\t Q\t Did the President say that the value of the \nU.S. contribution was that it would create security and \nprosperity for the United States? So what is it about this \nprogram that does this?\n\t \n\t SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: I think you have to \ngo back to the fundamental objective of our policy toward Russia, \nand that is we want to do everything we can to support the \ncontinuation of reform. We are convinced that if reformers stay \nin power, then we'll be able to continue the drawdown of nuclear \nforces, foreign policy cooperation and economic interaction, \nwhich are the three benefits to the United States from reform in \nRussia. So it's not a simple question. You can't just say that \nthis program is the answer. It's a long-term question and we \nhave to make a long-term commitment to it.\n\t \n\t Q\t And then on the question of Russia's ability to \nrepay, what convinces you they'll be able to pay seven to 15 \nyears from now?\n\t \n\t SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: Well, the Russian \ngovernment has made a commitment to repay, and what we're hoping \nis that if reform continues, and if they can continue to improve \ntheir oil and gas sector and earn additional hard currency \nrevenues, that Russia will be in a position six or seven years \nfrom now to pay back those loans.\n\t \n\t Q\t substantial government-to-government loan \nwe've ever gotten into with the Russians?\n\t \n\t SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: I don't want to \nanswer authoritatively on that. I don't go back 20 or 30 years \non this. But in the last four or five years, yes it is, because \nthe previous way that we financed grain exports was really to \njust ensure private bank loans. This is a different type of \neffort.\n\t \n\t Q\t government loans in any other sector that \nyou recall? I know it wasn't done in --\n\t \n\t SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: I think it's fair \nto say this is a new and unique effort.",
"\nDear Elias, \n\nI counted at least 4 such answers in public (plus whatever private\nemail replies you may have received), yet you refuse to accept\nanything. Perhaps you are better off in the private world of the\n\"Center for Policy Research\" in Iceland where you can define\n\"sensible\" in whatever way makes you feel most comfortable.\n",
"\n\nI think the is BZ gas, not CS or CN. BZ gas exposure results in projectile\nvomiting, loss of essentially all muscle control, inability to concentrate\nor think rationally and fatal reactions in a significant fraction of\nthe population. For that reason its use is limited to military\napplications.",
"\n Thanks for these surreal moments....\n Srinivas",
"OK I posted this B4 but:",
"\nAnd the reason that the Soviet Union couldn't achieve the ideal of pure\ncommunism was the hostility of surrounding capitalist nations...Uh huh.\nSomehow, this all sounds familiar. Once again, utopian dreams are \nconfronted by the real world...\n",
"\n\n\nApparently you *didn't* read the whole thing. You continue to miss the point.\n\n\n\n[deletions]\n\n\n\nCounselling that only provides alternatives to abortion would be just as\nbiased as counselling that only provides *abortion* information. How about\nproviding counselling that will give a woman help in finding what *she* is\ncomfortable with.\n\nYour adoption-funding idea may be a good one. Any idea if it is feasable?\n\n\n\n\nMaking adoption easier on the birth-mother may help reduce abortion, but\nit will *not* eliminate the need for it. Abortion is not done just because\nthe mother can't care for the child and doesn't feel good about giving it\nto strangers. Abortion is done because the mother can not afford the\n*pregnancy*.\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nThen please justify why being \"human\" automatically makes something valuable.\nAnd why that includes the unborn.\n\n\n\n\nNo, they are not guaranteed to become productive members of society. Even\nif they do that is *MANY YEARS* in the future--until which they are a burden\non someone, or society. There is also the matter of the mother. Forcing\nher to carry a pregnancy to term at a critical time in her life could prevent\nher from being a productive member of society.\n\n\n\n\n\n\nOk, look. It's like this. We *are* footing the bill. Maybe they will\ntake choice A. Maybe they will take choice B. Maybe they will take choice\nC. They can't afford any *one* of them. If they take choice A we'd have\nto pay them, say $5. If they take choice B it would cost us $20. If they\ntake choice C it will cost us $20 now and a hell of a lot more for the next\n18 years. Which one sounds the most realistic for us to be willing to pay\nfor? Now some people happen not to like choice A. Other people happen\nnot to like choice C (paying for it, that is). C has been around and paid\nfor for years. Even though it means we spend a lot of money, we can't in\nconscience refuse to pay for it. Now A has been around and is perfectly\nlegal, but it hasn't been funded in the past. Now A is going to be funded\nbut some people object. They don't like the idea of their tax money going\nto pay for choice A. So we could refuse to fund A at all. Then those\nwomen who can't afford any of those choices will be forced to take choice\nB or C, which will cost *all of us* more money. Most of us don't see any\nreason at all why *more money* should be spent to the effect of *removing\npersonal choice* from some women. The alternative is to fund A if that is\nwhat the mother chooses. We will also still fund B and even C if *that*\nis what the mother chooses. However, some women will certainly choose A,\nand that will then save us $15 we otherwise would have had to spend. Your\n\"taxes\" are not being raised to fund a choice you object, they are being\n*lowered* because we will fund a choice that is *legal*, despite your\nobjections to it. (Actually, your taxes are not really going to go down,\nas I'm sure you would point out. But the amount that is saved in that\narea can help out in another--like our massive debt.)\n\n\n\n\n\nThose other procedures you mention only cost money. There is no savings\nin other procedures that would be required down the road without them.\n(In fact, there could be additional costs down the road *because* of them.)\nThis is quite different from the case of abortion.\n\n\nThis is bullshit. We are *not* refusing \"to make the alternative affordable\ntoo\". If we refused to pay for the more expensive choice of birth, *then*\nyour statement would make sense. But that is not the case, so it doesn't.\nIf Clinton tried to block funding for pre-natal care and delivery (or left\nit out of his health-care plan), I would certainly object. I would also be\nquite surprised.\n\n\n\nYes, but probably not your definition of it, or for the reasons you think.\n\n\nYOU STUPID FUCK! *WE DO* want to fund *all* the choices. *YOU* are the\none who wants to *NOT* fund all the choices.\n\n\nYour humble opinion is still wrong. Even with easy adoption, there is still\nthe fact that pregnancy takes several months. Months in which a young woman\ncould need to be getting an education. (like finishing High School, entering\ncollege, finishing college, getting a job...things that are much harder to\ndo if you have to \"take a break\" for a few months...things that have a massive\nimpact on her future productivity.)\n\n\n\n\nYou *can* have a conversation with the \"mentally incompetant\". And even\nthough *you* personally may refuse to have a conversation with \"people\nyou just don't like\", it is still *possible* for others to have a conversation\nwith them. It is *not* possible for *anyone* to have a conversation with\na fetus.\n\n\n\nHe was still biologically independent. At least to the same extent you are\nnow. He consumed nutrients and digested them in the normal manner. He\nbreathed his own air. A fetus on the other hand, gets it's nutrients already\ndigested by the mother. It gets its oxygen from the mother as well. That\nis not biologically independent.\n\n\n\nAwareness is only *part* of what makes a \"member of society\". It is the\nminimal conceivable requirement, yet many people seem to think that something\nwithout awareness could still be important enough to justify the suffereing\nof a true member of society. I keep asking, but I still haven't seen a real\njustification for why the life of a non-sentient creature should be worth the\nsuffering of a sentient being. (I haven't read every response on the threads\nI've been asking on, yet, so we'll see if I see one later.)\n\n\n\nAnyone who can program in UNIX has a lot of experiences in the real world.",
"Does anyone have any Russian Contacts (Space or other) or contacts in the old\nUSSR/SU or Eastern Europe?\n\nPost them here so we all can talk to them and ask questions..\nI think the cost of email is high, so we would have to keep the content to\nspecific topics and such..\n\nBasically if we want to save Russia and such, then we need to make contacts,\ncontacts are a form of info, so lets get informing.\n\n==\nMichael Adams, nsmca@acad3.alaska.edu -- I'm not high, just jacked",
"\n\nBBS number\n510-226-2365",
"The federal civil rights trial against the four LA police\nofficers accused of violating Rodney King's civil rights is\nnow history:\n\n Lawrence Powell:\tguilty\n Stacey Coons:\t\tguilty\n Theodore Brazenio:\tinnocent\n Timothy Wind:\t\tinnocent\n\n Sentencing slated for mid August, appeals expected.\n\n So far, all is calm in LA...\n-- ",
"With regards to my condemnation of Marc's ridiculous attacks on the\nAmerican Department of Justice, and further attacks on Jews, to\nanyone who took offense to my calling Marc stupid, I\napologize for pointing out the obvious. It was a waste of the\nNet's time. I hope, though, that most American citizens have\nthe basic knowlege of the structure of American government to\nunderstand the relationship between the Justice Department\nas a part of the Executive Branch, and the Courts, which\nare of the Judicial Branch. \nMarc's ignorance of basic civic knowlege underscores his\ninability to comprehend and interpret foreign affairs. \n",
"Has anyone use Snooper or MacEKG or any other similar diagnostic \nsoftware.Any comparisons/reviews on these products would be very much \nappreciated.\n\nThanks in advance for your help\n\nCheers\n--\n",
"\nUnfortunately, Hoover thought himself above the constitution, whatever he\nconsidered the limits others should obey. He ruthlessly invaded the privacy\nof many private and public citizens. \n\n -mel",
"\n\n\nThis means you would support a ban if it were narrow enough. Good.\n\n\nI would hope so. Let's define a nuclear weapon as an explosive weapon\nwhose majority of energy comes from fission and/or fusion of atomic\nnuclei. Let's define a biological weapon as live organisms or viruses \nin such state, quantity, and with such a vector that they could cause \ndeath or serious disease [further defined] to a significant number of\npeople if released in a city, similarly populated area, resevoir, or\ncropland. \n\n\nNerve gas and mustard gas are well defined. Other poisonous\ngasses should be individually banned only if it can be shown that there\nis no use not related to weaponry. Licenses should be available for\nresearch purposes on such chemicals.\n\nI am not a lawyer, but these ideas could certainly be a basis for \ndefinitions.\n\n\nNope. It is not considered a weapon.\n\n\nIt is not defined as a weapon of mass destruction. Many things are\nbanned for other reasons.\n\n\n",
"\n- They invented the \"how to make money on others ideas\".\n- They made money.\n- They weren't in the air at the wrong time...\n\nAdmit it BillG is a damn smart guy. How many out there can make money on \nalmost useless products...Useless even if you look at the time Dos were \nwritten..it stinked already then..\n\nIf I could choose one marketing guy in the world, I think I would choose \nhim. He's so good that almost everyone hates him, but they still use his \nstuff...\n\n\n ThomasEZ.\n\n ' I'm not perfect, but I'm perfect for you. '",
"\nThe Houston Chronicle last Thursday (maybe Wednesday) said that\nthe interior of walls had been covered with hay bales to help\nprotect against bullets. Many of you know how fast dry hay\nburns.\n\n\nIn addition, the gas is specifically designed to force eyes\nclosed and the victim to vomit. How fast could you leave your\nburning office or home if your eyes were closed and you were\nretching violently?\n\n\n\n-- ",
"Library of Congress to Host Dead Sea Scroll Symposium April 21-22\n To: National and Assignment desks, Daybook Editor\n Contact: John Sullivan, 202-707-9216, or Lucy Suddreth, 202-707-9191\n both of the Library of Congress\n\n WASHINGTON, April 19 -- A symposium on the Dead Sea \nScrolls will be held at the Library of Congress on Wednesday,\nApril 21, and Thursday, April 22. The two-day program, cosponsored\nby the library and Baltimore Hebrew University, with additional\nsupport from the Project Judaica Foundation, will be held in the\nlibrary's Mumford Room, sixth floor, Madison Building.\n Seating is limited, and admission to any session of the symposium\nmust be requested in writing (see Note A).\n The symposium will be held one week before the public opening of a\nmajor exhibition, \"Scrolls from the Dead Sea: The Ancient Library of\nQumran and Modern Scholarship,\" that opens at the Library of Congress\non April 29. On view will be fragmentary scrolls and archaeological\nartifacts excavated at Qumran, on loan from the Israel Antiquities\nAuthority. Approximately 50 items from Library of Congress special\ncollections will augment these materials. The exhibition, on view in\nthe Madison Gallery, through Aug. 1, is made possible by a generous\ngift from the Project Judaica Foundation of Washington, D.C.\n The Dead Sea Scrolls have been the focus of public and scholarly\ninterest since 1947, when they were discovered in the desert 13 miles\neast of Jerusalem. The symposium will explore the origin and meaning\nof the scrolls and current scholarship. Scholars from diverse\nacademic backgrounds and religious affiliations, will offer their\ndisparate views, ensuring a lively discussion.\n The symposium schedule includes opening remarks on April 21, at\n2 p.m., by Librarian of Congress James H. Billington, and by\nDr. Norma Furst, president, Baltimore Hebrew University. Co-chairing\nthe symposium are Joseph Baumgarten, professor of Rabbinic Literature\nand Institutions, Baltimore Hebrew University and Michael Grunberger,\nhead, Hebraic Section, Library of Congress.\n Geza Vermes, professor emeritus of Jewish studies, Oxford\nUniversity, will give the keynote address on the current state of\nscroll research, focusing on where we stand today. On the second\nday, the closing address will be given by Shmaryahu Talmon, who will\npropose a research agenda, picking up the theme of how the Qumran\nstudies might proceed.\n On Wednesday, April 21, other speakers will include:\n\n -- Eugene Ulrich, professor of Hebrew Scriptures, University of\nNotre Dame and chief editor, Biblical Scrolls from Qumran, on \"The\nBible at Qumran;\"\n -- Michael Stone, National Endowment for the Humanities\ndistinguished visiting professor of religious studies, University of\nRichmond, on \"The Dead Sea Scrolls and the Pseudepigrapha.\"\n -- From 5 p.m. to 6:30 p.m. a special preview of the exhibition\nwill be given to symposium participants and guests.\n\n On Thursday, April 22, beginning at 9 a.m., speakers will include:\n\n -- Magen Broshi, curator, shrine of the Book, Israel Museum,\nJerusalem, on \"Qumran: The Archaeological Evidence;\"\n -- P. Kyle McCarter, Albright professor of Biblical and ancient\nnear Eastern studies, The Johns Hopkins University, on \"The Copper\nScroll;\"\n -- Lawrence H. Schiffman, professor of Hebrew and Judaic studies,\nNew York University, on \"The Dead Sea Scrolls and the History of\nJudaism;\" and\n -- James VanderKam, professor of theology, University of Notre\nDame, on \"Messianism in the Scrolls and in Early Christianity.\"\n\n The Thursday afternoon sessions, at 1:30 p.m., include:\n\n -- Devorah Dimant, associate professor of Bible and Ancient Jewish\nThought, University of Haifa, on \"Qumran Manuscripts: Library of a\nJewish Community;\"\n -- Norman Golb, Rosenberger professor of Jewish history and\ncivilization, Oriental Institute, University of Chicago, on \"The\nCurrent Status of the Jerusalem Origin of the Scrolls;\"\n -- Shmaryahu Talmon, J.L. Magnas professor emeritus of Biblical\nstudies, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, on \"The Essential 'Commune of\nthe Renewed Covenant': How Should Qumran Studies Proceed?\" will close\nthe symposium.\n\n There will be ample time for question and answer periods at the\nend of each session.\n\n Also on Wednesday, April 21, at 11 a.m.:\n The Library of Congress and The Israel Antiquities Authority\nwill hold a lecture by Esther Boyd-Alkalay, consulting conservator,\nIsrael Antiquities Authority, on \"Preserving the Dead Sea Scrolls\"\nin the Mumford Room, LM-649, James Madison Memorial Building, The\nLibrary of Congress, 101 Independence Ave., S.E., Washington, D.C.\n ------\n NOTE A: For more information about admission to the symposium,\nplease contact, in writing, Dr. Michael Grunberger, head, Hebraic\nSection, African and Middle Eastern Division, Library of Congress,\nWashington, D.C. 20540.\n -30-",
"\n (stuff deleted)\n\n [First point. What they are doing is wrong, just as what\nJoseph's brothers did was wrong, just as what Judas did was wrong.\nThey intend it for evil. If God somehow brings good out of it, that\ndoes not make them any less subject to just condemnation and\npunishment.\n Second point. Of course, God will bring good out of it. But not\nthe same good that He would have brought if the Serbians had\nrefrained from the sins of robbery and rape and murder. Nor does the\ngood He purposes excuse us from the duty of doing what is right.]\n",
"Yes, you increase the RPM slip of a \"boxer\" type fan by installing\na capacitor in series with the fan's power supply. The air flow of\nsmall 3.5 inch fans can be reduced by about 50% by using a 1 to 4\nuF capacitor. Use a good grade nonpolarized unit with working\nvoltage rating around 250 volts. Note that some impriical study is\nusually required to experimentally determine the best size\ncapacitor for a given application.\n\nFor DC powered applications, try the Radio Shack 12 volt box fan.\nIt can run and start reliably from as low as about 4.5 VDC. It is\nexceptionally quiet, but at admittedly low flow. I wish I knew who\nmade the fans for Radio Shack.\n\n",
"In the Monday, May 10 morning edition of the San Jose Mercury News an\narticle by Sandra Gonzales at the top of page 12A explained convicted\nkiller David Edwin Mason's troubled childhood saying,\n\n\t\"Raised in Oakland and San Lorenzo by strict fundamentalist\n\tChristian parents, Mason was beaten as a child. He once was\n\ttied to a workbench and gagged with a cloth after he accidently\n\turinated on his mother when she walked under his bedroom window,\n\tcourt records show.\"\n\nWere the San Jose Mercury news to come out with an article starting with\n\"Raised in Oakland by Mexican parents, Mason was beaten...\", my face would\nbe red with anger over the injustice done to my Mexican family members and\nthe Mexican community as a whole. I'm sure Sandra Gonzales would be equally\nupset.\n\nWhy is it that open biggotry like this is practiced and encouraged by the\nSan Jose Mercury News when it is pointed at the christian community?\n\nCan a good christian continue to purchase newspapers and buy advertising in\nthis kind of a newspaper? This is really bad journalism.",
"Hmmm...\n A possibility for the software registration conondrum would be to have the\ndistributor register the copy when the software was sold. The clerk sticks it\nin the store PC and asks for the buyers ID. Later, if pirated versions showed up they could be tracked to the original purchaser. In addition copies which were\nsent to distributors/stores would have a vendor reg # or serial # in order to\ntrack in store piracy.\n\nPossible additional program security schemes would be:\n1. having monthly password changes which necessitate user call in\n and registration. (inconvenient)\n2. taking dire legal action on anyone caught (expensive)\n3. encryption, crc check, self modifying code (limited effectiveness)\n4. have an independent watchdog program in the installation/setup config or\n memory manager, etc. which would check the main program's crc. \n (only as effective as above methods at best.)\n5. have the above watchdog circulating as a virus which would trash cracked \n copies of the program and/or the offenders hard drive. (risky, and probably\n illegal, certainly immoral)\n\nmy new ideas aren't terribly feasible to implement as presented, but I thought\nif I threw them out people could think of variations that might be effective.\nWhat is the problem with parallel port security keys? I haven't used anything\nthat had hardware key copy protection schemes, so I don't know what the\ndrawbacks are. I know the companies that make them claim they're uncrackable,\nbut I've seen cracks of AutoDesk 3d-studio floating around (I don't have one\nso don't ask) and I had heard that it had parralel port keys.",
"\nWomen who are known not to want abortion services, for example,\nmight be judged to be more likely to require prenatal care &\ncoverage for childbirth... which can be an order of magnitude\nmore expensive than abortion. \n\nThis topic should really be restricted to talk.abortion, which\nexists to relieve t.r.m & t.p.m of abortion flamage. \n",
"\nOh, yeah. This is a fine place. We haven't had the \"why does concrete\nkill lead-acid batteries\" thread in at least six months.\n\n\nThe concrete simply sucks all the electrons out of the battery and drains\nthem into the ground.\n\nAnother explanation, implausible as it is, is that the lead-acid battery\nneeds to be periodically charged (topped-off), otherwise the battery\nself-discharges and then undergoes irreversible chemical reaction.\n\nNaawwwww.... the concrete sucks the life out.\n",
"\nUsing greenhouses to extend the growing season shouldn't be a problem.\nI'm supprised they don't do so in Alaska (cheaper to import, perhaps?)\n\n\nNo, the Incas had no problems with this, but the Spanish did.",
" Dandridge Cole and Isaac Asimov collaborated on a book titled,\n\"Habitable Planets for Man\" (I think) in 1964. It should be available\nin most good libraries, or through inter-library loan.\n\n It answered the questions you ask (speculatively, of course), along\nwith many more that need to be considered in habitability studies:\nlength of day (for day/night temperature variation, and agricultural\nconcerns), partial pressures of certain unexpected gasses (ever hear of\nxenon narcosis? neither did I), density of particulates in the atm, and\ntheir composition (ever hear of silicosis? not much fun), etc.\n\n Climate isn't a global phenomenon and probably needn't concern you,\nbut axial tilt ought to. It plays a large part in determining the\nseverity of seasonal differences, and a lesser but still significant\npart in determining the speed of prevailing winds.",
"THE WHITE HOUSE\n\n Office of the Press Secretary\n (Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania)\n______________________________________________________________\nFor Immediate Release April 17, 1993 \n\n\t \n INTERVIEW OF THE PRESIDENT\n BY MICHAEL WHITELY OF\n KDKA-AM RADIO, PITTSBURGH\n\t \n Pittsburgh International Airport\n Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania \n\n\n\n10:40 A.M. EDT\n\t \n\t \n\t Q\t For everyone listening on KDKA Radio, I'm Mike \nWhitely, KDKA Radio News. We're here at the Pittsburgh \nInternational Airport and with me is the President of the United \nStates Bill Clinton.\n\t \n\t And I'd like to welcome you to the area and to KDKA.\n\t \n\t THE PRESIDENT: Thank you, Mike. Glad to be here.\n\t \n\t Q\t There are a lot of things we'd like to talk \nabout in the brief amount of time we have, but some news is just \nbreaking from Los Angeles. I guess the entire country has been \nkind of holding their breath, wondering what's going to happen in \nthe trial of the four Los Angeles police officers. We just heard \nthat two of those officers, the sergeant, Sergeant Koon and \nOfficer Powell have been found guilty, and two officers have been \nfound not guilty.\n\t \n\t It's a situation that's been building for over a \nyear since the first trial and now this trial and this verdict. \nAnd I wonder what your thoughts are this morning on how you see \nthe situation in Los Angeles in connection with your \nadministration and what you're trying to do.\n\t \n\t THE PRESIDENT: Well, first of all, I think the \nAmerican people should know that this trial, in my judgment, is a \ntribute to the work and judgment of the jury, as well as to the \nefforts of the federal government in developing the case.\n\t \n\t The law under which the officers were tried is a \ncomplex one; the standards of proof are complicated. The jury \ndecided that they would convict the sergeant who was responsible \nfor supervising the officers and the officer who on the film did \nmost of the beating. The jury acquitted an officer who kicked \nRodney King, but also plainly tried to shield him from some \nblows, and another officer who was a rookie.\n\t \n\t No one knows exactly why they did what they did, but \nit appears that they really tried to do justice here. They \nacknowledged that his civil rights were violated. And I think \nthat the American people should take a lot of pride in that. But \nI hope now we can begin to look ahead and focus on three things: \nfirst of all, the importance of trying to bring this country \ntogether and not violate the civil rights of any American; \nsecondly, the importance of renewing our fight against crime. \n\t \n\t I think it's important to recognize that in the \npoorest areas of Los Angeles and many other cities in this \ncountry, people may be worried about police abuse, but they're \neven more worried about crime. It's time that we renewed our \nefforts to go to community policing -- put 100,000 more police \nofficers on the street; pass the Brady Bill that would require a \nwaiting period before people could buy a handgun, and do some \nother things to reduce the vulnerability of our people to \nviolence and drugs.\n\t \n\t And the last point I'd like to make is it seems to \nme that we have got to rededicate ourselves to the economic \nrevitalization of our cities and other economically-distressed \nareas. If you just think about it -- if everybody in Los Angeles \nwho wanted a job had one, I don't think we'd have quite as many \nproblems as we do. \n\t \n\t And I laid out a very ambitious program in the \ncampaign to try to bring private investment and public investment \nto bear in our cities. I have dispatched the Commerce Secretary, \nRon Brown, to California to try to come up with some strategies \nfor that state, because it's our biggest state with our highest \nunemployment rate -- which could then be applied around the \ncountry. I want to talk to him and to the Attorney General, to \nthe new head of the NAACP, to Reverend Jackson, and to several \nother people, and then I'll decide where to go from here with \nregard to Los Angeles and the other cities of the country.\n\t \n\t Q\t Let's talk about what brings you to the \nPittsburgh area today. There have been -- I guess there's been a \nlot of discussion on Capitol Hill about your stimulus package. \nYou've been locked in a battle with the GOP. Yesterday, as you \nsaid earlier in your radio address, you made some moves to break \nthat gridlock. What brings you to Pittsburgh, in particular to \nAllegheny County, in particular to Pennsylvania, with that \nbattle?\n\t \n\t THE PRESIDENT: Well, there are two reasons. First \nof all, Pittsburgh, Allegheny County and Pennsylvania supported \nme in the last election because they wanted a new direction in \neconomic policy. We have passed our overall economic plan; it \ngives the country a very different budget for the next five years \nthan we've had in the previous 12. We reduced the deficit and, \nat the same time, increased investment in jobs and education and \nhealth care, in the things that will make us a stronger country.\n\t \n\t But in addition to that, I asked the Congress in the \nshort run to spend a little more money, a modest amount of money \nto create another half-million jobs in the next year and a half; \nto try to cut the unemployment rate by a half a percent; but also \nto try to spark job creation in the private sector more. The \nplan passed the House. It has the support of a majority of the \nSenate. At the present time, all the Republican senators as a \nbloc are filibustering the bill. That is, they won't let it come \nto a vote.\n\t \n\t I believe that Senator Specter would like to vote \nfor the bill. And I believe that Senator Dole, the Republican \nleader, has put a lot of pressure on a lot of the Republicans to \nstay hitched. And they're all saying that this bill increases \nthe deficit. It doesn't. This bill is well below the spending \ntargets that Congress approved, including the Republicans, for \nthis year. This bill is paid for by budget cuts in the next five \nyears. This bill is designed to give a jump-start to the \neconomy. And I must say, a lot of the Republican senators that \nare holding it up, when Mr. Bush was President, voted for \nbillions of dollars of emergency spending of just this kind --\nmuch of it was totally unrelated to creating jobs.\n\t \n\t So what I'm trying to do is to break this logjam. \nI've held out an olive branch, I've offered a compromise. But I \nthink that we ought to try to put some more Americans to work \nright now to show that we're changing the direction of the \ncountry. And that's the purpose of the bill.\n\t \n\t Q\t Have you been in touch with Senator Specter or \nhis office lately?\n\t \n\t THE PRESIDENT: Well, we've been trying to talk \nregularly to -- through my White House Congressional Liaison \noperation to the senators that we think are open to this --\nSenator Specter, Senator D'Amato from New York, Senator Jeffords \nfrom Vermont, Senator Hatfield from Oregon, and five or six \nothers whom we believe know we need more jobs in this economy and \nknow that we are paying for this with budget cuts over the life \nof the budget I presented.\n\t \n\t You know, it has a lot of appeal to say, well, we've \ngot a big deficit, we shouldn't increase it more. But the truth \nis that we are paying for this with budget cuts in the whole life \nof the budget over the next few years. And more importantly, we \nhave this program well below the spending targets that Congress \nhas already approved for this year. And they've done this for \nyears, with the Republicans voting for it -- many Republicans \nvoting for it -- for things that weren't nearly as important as \nputting the American people back to work. \n\t \n\t So I just hope that this doesn't become a political \nissue. It ought to just be about the people of this country and \nthe need for jobs.\n\t \n\t Q\t I have some questions from people who supported \nyou, and some people who are skeptical about your administration. \nIt has to do with their hopes, and also with their fears. A lot \nof people who supported you and voted for you in Pennsylvania --I \nthink some of them are now saying, we're glad we got him in the \nWhite House, but now look at this incredible process he has to go \nthrough. Look at these problems. Look at this gridlock. And \nthey're beginning to wonder, is this going to work; can you pull \nit off? And, of course, your skeptics are saying, well, I knew \nit was going to be like this.\n\t \n\t THE PRESIDENT: Well, what I would -- I'd ask \npeople, first of all, to remember that we are, frankly, moving \nvery fast. The budget resolution that the Congress passed is the \nfastest they have ever passed a budget resolution -- ever -- in \nhistory, setting out the next five-year budget targets. So we \nare moving really rapidly. And we've got them working on \npolitical reform, welfare reform, health care reform, a whole \nwide range of things. \n\t \n\t But it's a big operation. You can't expect to turn \nit around overnight. It took 12 years to produce the conditions \nwhich led to the victory I received from the people in November, \nand we can't turn it around in 90 days. But I think we're making \nreal, real progress. \n\t \n\t I would urge the people not to get discouraged. \nWe're not going to win every battle, and not everything is going \nto happen overnight. But we are definitely moving and changing \nthings.\n\t \n\t Q\t Thank you very much. \n\t \n\t The President of the United States, Bill Clinton, \nhere live at Pittsburgh International Airport. I'm Mike Whitely, \nKDKA News.",
"\n\n\nI take it you mean President Nixon, not private citizen Nixon. Sure.\nNothing I'm doing would be of the slightest interest to President Nixon .\n\nDavid\n\n",
"\nIt's not what they did that matters. It's what *you* do and\nwhat *I* do and what *we* do in response that matters. Do we\nlessen ourselves by killing in response to killing? It's\nvengeance. That's all. It's no deterrent. It serves no\npurpose but to slake somebody's blood lust.\n\n\nYeah yeah yeah... and sure would be nice if we didn't apply the\ndeath penalty disproportionately to minorities. I'll revisit my\nopinion on the death penalty when there are more whites up for\nit than blacks. I.e., when hell freezes over.\n",
"\n\nUp to 60 microamperes = on hook\n\nOver something like 10 mA = off hook\n\nIn between = defective line, and the phone company comes looking\n for leaky insulation.\n\n\n",
" >drug dealers, spies, terrorists, and organized crime figures (assuming\n >enough probable cause to convince a judge) who need to be watched, not\n >law-abiding citizens.",
": >If I remember correctly, the reason that BMW's come with those expensive,\n: >and relatively worthless, short lived Varda batteries, is 'cause BMW owns\n: >a controling interest in that battery Manufacturer. \n\n: What's wrong with the BMW battery? I've never had problems and I know\n: numerous people that are still using the original battery in there\n: 8-10 year old beemers.\n\nTHe original battery in an 8-10 year old BMW may be fine. Mine lasted many\nyears. The replacement 30AH battery from BMW was a disaster. The mechanic\nfrom Comp. Acc. told me that CA would warantee replace the bad one with a\nnew one of the same evil bad batteries and tell the customer if they have\nproblems to bring it back and they'd do it again. It seems that many of\nthose 30AH batteries were DOA, near-DOA, and always unlikely to be going\nstrong by the end of the warantee period on them. THere was a big batch of\nbad ones, and they replaced them with -you guessed it - more bad ones. BMW\nswitched to a 25AH battery that has more cold cranking amps, even if it has\nless total juice. \n\nI switched to a YUASA that has even more cold cranking amps and cost one\nthird fewer dollars.\n",
"\n\nYeah, me. Both the Slickmeister and Hillary's buddy Janet say\nthey're responsible... I want both their resignations on my desk \nyesterday. I also want both thier butts up on federal civil rights\nviolations.... something which carries life in prison as a penalty.\n\nOh, and I'll contribute $20 to Arlen Specter's presidential campaign\nfor having the 'nads to launch the Senate investigation.",
"In making batteries you could use copper and zinc in an acid electrolyte. \nCopper=copper wire (pennies are now mostly zinc if I recall correctly)\nzinc= zinc strip (Hardware stores arround here (Seattle) sell this to prevent\n moss buildup on the roof. An alternative would be to use a galvanized\n (zinc coated) nail\nelectrolyte= lemon juice -> Citric acid is the active ingrediant(sp).\n \nVolta (late 18th century scientist) used a stack for his batteries-\ncopper disk, paper disk soaked in acid, zinc disk, copper disk, paper ....\nthey were advanced technology for the time. ",
"\nI'm sure zero-intested economical systems survive on a small-scale,\nco-ops is not an Islamic invention, and we have co-operatives working\nall around the world. However such systems don't stand the corruption\nof a large scale operation. Actually, nothing could handle human\ngreed, IMHO. Not even Allah :-).\n\nCheers,\nKent",
":>Top Ten Ways Slick Willie Could Improve His Standing With Americans\n:>\n:>10. Institute a national sales tax to pay for the socialization of\n:> America's health care resources.\n:>\n:>9. Declare war on Serbia. Reenact the draft.\n:>\n:>8. Stimulate the economy with massive income transfers to Democtratic\n:> constituencies.\n:>\n:>7. Appoint an unrepetent socialist like Mario Cuomo to the Suprmeme Court.\n:>\n:>6. Focus like a laser beam on gays in the military.\n:>\n:>5. Put Hillary in charge of the Ministry of Truth and move Stephanopoulos\n:> over to socialzed health care.\n:>\n:>4. Balance the budget through confiscatory taxation.\n:>\n:>3. Remind everyone, again, how despite the Democrats holding the\n:> Presidency, the majority of seats in the House, and in the Senate,\n:> the Republicans have still managed to block his tax-and-spend programs.\n:>\n:>2. Go back to England and get a refresher course in European Socialism.\n:>\n\n ***SNIP***\n\nAnd the number one way Slick Willie could improve his standing with\nAmericans...\n\n(Drum roll Anton)\n\n1. Get himself an appointment with Dr. Kervorkian - and keep it!\n\n-- \n-------------------------------------------------------------------------------\n** John Kerrigan a.k.a. jmkerrig@vela.acs.oakland.edu **",
"\n\n\n\n\n\n\nYeah, right.\n\n\n\n\n\nSo, let's see. If some guy writes a piece with a title that implies\nsomething is the case then it must be so, is that it?\n\n\nThis supports nothing. I have no reason to believe that this is \npiece is anything other than another anti-Islamic slander job.\nI have no respect for titles, only for real content. I can look\nup this article if I want, true. But I can tell you BCCI was _not_\nan Islamic bank. Seeing as I'm spending my time responding to\npropaganda (in responding to this little sub-thread) I really\ndon't feel a deep need to do more than make statements to the\neffect that the propaganda is false. If someone wants to discuss\nthe issue more seriously then I'd be glad to have a real discussion,\nproviding references, etc.\n",
"\n\n\n\nIt is good to remember that every translation is to some extent an\ninterpretation, so (as you point out below) one must really go back to\nthe original Arabic. Regarding the verses relevant to nature, I prefer\nto use Dr. Maurice Bucaille's translations (in his book, \"The Bible, the\nQur'an and Science\") for in general his translations are more literal.\n \nMaurice Bucaille translates the portion of the verse you are addressing\nas \n\n\"...Each one is travelling with an orbit in its own motion.\"\n\n(Also note that \"the celestial bodies\" in the first translation quoted\nby you above is the translator's interpolation -- it is not existent in\nthe original Arabic, which is why it is included in brackets.) \n\n\nYou're right, what the verses _do_ contain isn't all that remarkable.\n\nHowever, Dr. Bucaille (a surgeon, that's how he's a \"Dr.\") thinks it is\nsignificant that the above verse contains no geocentric ideas, even\nthough geocentrism was all the rage up until the 17th century (?) or so.\n(And this goes for the rest of the Qur'an as well, which has about 750\nverses or so regarding nature, I think I remember reading once.)",
"\nYes.\n\n\nPlease describe these \"number of ways\" in detail. Then explain the any\ncontradictions that may arise.\n\n\nDefine \"difficult\".\n\n\nExplain the laws in America stating that you have to drive on the right-\nhand side of the road.\n\n\nSo if every member of the species was homosexual, this wouldn't be destructive\nto the survival of the species?\n\n\nThe whole \"theory\" needs to be reexamined...",
"\n\n\n\n\n\tYeah, I'm also curious as to why you felt compelled to remind us of the\nguy's race. BTW, I don't mean to imply that you're clueless or anything, but\nthe statement was *hardly* \"benign\". \n-- \n\n\n",
"\n\nI don't think I've changed my stance at all. My original stance was that\na painless execution was not a cruel one. I didn't say what would be\nconsidered cruel, only that a painless death wasn't. Now, cruelty must\ninvolve some sort of suffering, I believe. I don't think someone that gets\nshot in the head or electrocuted really suffers very much. Even a hanging\nprobably produces one sharp instance of pain, but it's over so quickly...\n\n\nPardon?\n\n\nNo. Well, again I stated that a painless death isn't cruel, but I don't\nthink I stated that all painful executions *are* cruel. I think that some\nare cruel, depending on the nature and duration of the pain.\n\n\nAnything more than an instant, I guess. Any death by suffocation\nasphyxiation, or blood loss would be cruel, I think (this includes the\ngas chamber, and drawing and quartering). I'd say that any pain that\nlasts, say, over twenty seconds or so would be too long (but this may\nbe an arbitrary cutoff, I suppose).",
"NO SURRENDER!\nDelivered by Lenda Jackson at the RKBA Rally in Denver, April 18, 1993\n\nIt is a fact of modern life that urban residents, particularly women, feel\nthreatened. A certain number of them actually are threatened. There are\nimmediate threats, the things that women will tell you they're afraid\nof. The noise downstairs at night. The lonely walk to the car. The\nstranger at the door. The abusive husband, finally kicked out of the\nhouse as he threatens to hurt her and their children. The burglar... The\nmugger...the rapist. \n\nAnd what are we told is the solution? Move. Get a dog. Keep the door\nlocked. Call the police. as a next-to-last resort, learn martial arts. and\nalways, there's the implied question \"what's a pretty little thing like\nyou doing without a husband around to protect you?\n\nBut what if you don't like dogs? Like living alone? Don't have 10\nyears to devote learning judo?\n\nWhat if, after examining the facts, a woman learns that \"rape victims\nusing armed resistance were less likely to have the rape completed -\nand were less likely to be injured(Kleck,124) than those using any\nother form of resistance (Kleck,126) (also true for\nrobbery/assault)(Kleck,123) \n\nWhat if, to our horror and despair, we find that citizens cannot depend\non the police for effective protection - they usually respond after a\ncrime has been committed. In truth, the Supreme Court has held that\nthe police are not responsible for protecting any individual, only the\nwhole community.\n\nAs a society, are we going to ask women, once again, to sacrifice\nthemselves? Are we going to continue to deny women the ability to\nhelp themselves?\n\nHere's a thought. Neil Smith, in his book The Probability Broach, says\n\"no 220 pound thug can threaten the well being or dignity of a 110-\npound woman who has two pounds of iron to even things out.\" But if\na woman decides to protect herself, with the easiest, most efficient\nmeans possible, people - especially other women - are horrified.\n\"Eughh, how could you? I'd be terrified!\" they ask. How could you\nhurt someone? They'll repeat the lie: it'll just get taken away from\nyou. In truth, 1% of \"defensive gun uses\" result in the offender taking\nthe gun away from the victim.(122,Kleck)\n\nWell, despite the lies, and the social pressure, some of us have already\nmade that hard choice. We've decided that we are not going to be\nvictimized by the muggers, burglars or rapists. We're buying more\nguns than every before. We're learning how to use them - and teaching\nothers, women and men, how to use them. Most importantly, we are\npreparing ourselves mentally to use our firearms for our own defense.\nWe're taking our own security, literally, into our own hands. We're\ngoing to stop begging and pleading and marching and WHAT WE\nINTEND IS TO REALLY TAKE BACK THE NIGHT.\n\nBut there's another threat, more insatiable than any mugger, more\nsecretive than any burglar, more soul-destroying than any rapist.\n\nThat menace is government, and it threatens us all. We know that\ngovernments, throughout time, have suppressed rights and oppressed\npeople. It's the way they survive.\n\nIn our names and with our money, it interferes with innocent people\nboth at home and abroad. It lies to us, cheats us, steals from us and\nthreatens us with violence. No one knows exactly what it'll do next -\nwhat freedom we will lose because some government goon decides\n\"it's for your own safety\" or \"we know best\". Any person who acted\nlike government does would be psychoanalyzed within an inch of his\nlife and locked up as a habitual offender.\n\nBut this monster called government persists, and grows. And we, who\nshould be its masters, have become its unwilling slaves. Do you doubt\nme? Then why did you file your income tax? \n\nLike any reasonable person, I believe that being afraid of something\nthat can hurt you is smart, and that paranoia isn't crazy if someone's\nreally after you. And make no mistake, they're after you and they're\nafter me. Their names are familiar: Brady and Reynolds, Groff,\nMetzenbahm, Moynihan, and Clinton. If we're lucky, they'll settle for\nour assault rifles, our shotguns, our handguns and our ammunition. \n\nAs citizens, we have only two choices. They are the same two choices\ngiven to women: to surrender or to fight. \n\nSurrender leads to the gulag, to the genocide of Pol Pot, to the\ndisappearances, to Dachau. I do not intend to surrender. \n\nA battle can be philosophical or political: in the main, the people keep\nthe government honest by threatening to vote it out of office. But if\nthey have to, they will keep in mind the words of Thomas Jefferson:\n\"the tree of liberty must be well watered with the blood of patriots.\"\n\nAs a patriot, I will point out the error in the government's ways. I will\ndo my best to vote the villains out of office. I will protest, and write,\nand speak, and teach our children justice, honor and truth. And always\nremember that Rebellion can lead to Bunker Hill and Saratoga......or it\ncan lead to Tiananmen Square. \n\nWhen the time comes to stand up, if I have to give my life to keep\nthem from going too far, if there is a Tiananmen Square in our future,\nI intend to be there. And no matter what lies they tell and no matter\nwhat laws they pass, I intend to meet them with something more\nsubstantial in my hand than a brick. ",
"[...]\n\nHow ironic.",
": >\tNot to pick on Mr. May in particular, of course, but isn't this\n: >kind of the domino theory? When one little country falls, its neighbor\n: >will surely follow, and before you know it, we're all mining salt\n: >in Siberia for not turning in our Captain Crunch Secret Decoder Rings.\n: \n: But, for all the wrongness of our attempt to correct it (VietNam, et. al.),\n: the domino theory wasn't disproved at all.\n\nIronically, the domino theory in fact *was* a reasonable metaphor for\nthe collapse of communism, from the liberalizations in Poland and\nHungary to the border crossings in the summer of '89 to the fall of\nthe Wall later that year....and then to the ultimate collapse of the\nUSSR.\n\n-Tim May",
"\n\nWell, one reason for getting conflicting answers is that it depends on\nwhat you want the ground plane to do. A continuous conductor is a good \nelectrostatic shield. Do you have signals on your board that need\nshielding rom other things? This shielding won't do much good for magnetic\nfields, unless you make it continuous around the circuit to be shielded,\nlike a Faraday cage.",
"\nAs has been noted before, there is the distinction between _motivation_\nand _method_. No experimental result should be accepted unless it is\ndescribed in sufficient detail to be replicated, and the replications\ndo indeed reproduce the result. No theoretical argument should be\naccepted unless it is presented in sufficient detail to be followed, and\nreasonable, knowlegeable, people agree with the force of the logic.\n\nBut people try experiments, and pursue arguments, for all sorts of crazy\nreasons. Irrational motivations are not just curiousities; they are a\nlarge part of the history of science.\n\nThere are a couple of negative points to make here:\n\n1) A theory of qi could, conceivably, become accepted without direct\nverification of the existence of qi. For example, quarks are an accepted\npart of the standard model of physics, with no direct verification. What\nwould be needed would be a theory, based on qi, that predicted medical\nreality better than the alternatives. The central theoretical claim could\nlie forever beyond experiment, as long as there was a sufficient body of\nexperimental data that the qi theory predicted better than any other.\n\n(I wouldn't hold my breath waiting for the triumph of qi, though.\nI don't think that there is even a coherent theory based on it, much less\na theory that explains anything at all better than modern biology. And it\nis hard to imagine a qi theory that would not predict some way of rather\ndirectly verifying the existence of qi.)\n\n2) Science has not historically progressed in any sort of rational\nexperiment-data-theory sequence. Most experiments are carried out, and\ninterpreted, in pre-existing theoretical frameworks. The theoretical\ncontroversies of the day determine which experiments get done. Overall,\nthere is a huge messy affair of personal jealousies, crazy motivations,\npetty hatreds, and the like that determines which experiments, and which\ncomputations, get done. What keeps it going forward is the critical\nfunction of science: results don't count unless they can be replicated.\n\nThe whole system is a sort of mechanism for generate-and-test. The generate\npart can be totally irrational, as long as the test part works properly.\n\nPasteur could believe whatever he liked about chemical activity and crystals;\nbut even Mitscherlich had to agree that racemic acid crystals were handed;\nthat when you separate them by handedness, you get two chemicals that rotate\npolarized light in opposite directions; and the right-rotating version was\nindistinguishable from tartaric acid. Pasteur's irrational motivation had\nled to a replicable, and important, result.\n\nThis is where Lysenko, creationists, etc. fail. They have usually not\neven produced coherent theories that predict much of anything. When their\ntheories do predict, and are contradicted by experiment, they do not\nconcede the point and modify their theories; rather they try to suppress\nthe results (Lysenko) or try to divert attention to other evidence they\nthink supports their position (creationists).",
"----------------------------Original message----------------------------\n D\"SB\n\nBelow please find an electronic copy of a leaflet put up at Warsaw U.:\n\nDEGEL*HATORAH Jewish Circle for Arts and Sciences,\nUniversity of Warsaw, Warsaw, invites you to the lecture\n*PRESENT-DAY SOCIOPOLITICAL ISSUES OF THE MIDDLE EAST*\nwhich will be delivered by Dr Mohamed SOLIMAN,\nEgypt's Ambassador to Poland.\nTime & place: 4 p.m., Tuesday, 25th May, '93, (Erev Shavuot;\nDept. of Arabic & Islamic Studies, Oriental Institute\n(Polish: Orientalistyka), University of Warsaw,\n26/28 Krakowskie Przedmies'cie Street, PL-00-927 WARSAW, Poland.\n\n:molahs ahetovit'n lohk'v * ma(on yehk'rad ahehkar'd\n * *\n############# * * * * * * * ############\n############# * * * * ############\n # * * #\n# # * * * * #\n# # * * * * * * * #\n * *\n *\n\nDEGEL*HATORAH Judaistyczne Kol/o Nauk i Sztuk\nprzy Uniwersytecie Warszawskim w Warszawie\nzaprasza na wykl/ad pt.\n*AKTUALNE ZAGADNIENIA SPOL/ECZNO-POLITYCZNE BLISKIEGO WSCHODU*,\nkto'ry wygl/osi Dr Mohamed SOLIMAN, Ambasador Egiptu w Polsce.\nCzas i miejsce: 16:00, wtorek, 25 maja, '93, (Erev Shavuot;\nZakl/ad Arabistyki i Islamistyki, Instytut Orientalistyczny,\nUniwersytet Warszawski, 26/28 Krakowskie Przedmies'cie,\nPL-00-927 WARSZAWA.",
"The following partial summary of a Theory of the Universe includes a\nlittle-known description of the CREATION of our Solar System:\n\n\n LARSONIAN Astronomy and Physics\n\n Orthodox physicists, astronomers, and astrophysicists \n CLAIM to be looking for a \"Unified Field Theory\" in which all \n of the forces of the universe can be explained with a single \n set of laws or equations. But they have been systematically \n IGNORING or SUPPRESSING an excellent one for 30 years! \n\n The late Physicist Dewey B. Larson's comprehensive \n GENERAL UNIFIED Theory of the physical universe, which he \n calls the \"Reciprocal System\", is built on two fundamental \n postulates about the physical and mathematical natures of \n space and time: \n \n (1) \"The physical universe is composed ENTIRELY of ONE \n component, MOTION, existing in THREE dimensions, in DISCRETE \n UNITS, and in two RECIPROCAL forms, SPACE and TIME.\" \n \n (2) \"The physical universe conforms to the relations of \n ORDINARY COMMUTATIVE mathematics, its magnitudes are \n ABSOLUTE, and its geometry is EUCLIDEAN.\" \n \n From these two postulates, Larson developed a COMPLETE \n Theoretical Universe, using various combinations of \n translational, vibrational, rotational, and vibrational-\n rotational MOTIONS, the concepts of IN-ward and OUT-ward \n SCALAR MOTIONS, and speeds in relation to the Speed of Light \n (which Larson called \"UNIT VELOCITY\" and \"THE NATURAL \n DATUM\"). \n \n At each step in the development, Larson was able to \n MATCH objects in his Theoretical Universe with objects in the \n REAL physical universe, (photons, sub-atomic particles \n [INCOMPLETE ATOMS], charges, atoms, molecules, globular star \n clusters, galaxies, binary star systems, solar systems, white \n dwarf stars, pulsars, quasars, ETC.), even objects NOT YET \n DISCOVERED THEN (such as EXPLODING GALAXIES, and GAMMA-RAY \n BURSTS). \n \n And applying his Theory to his NEW model of the atom, \n Larson was able to precisely and accurately CALCULATE inter-\n atomic distances in crystals and molecules, compressibility \n and thermal expansion of solids, and other properties of \n matter. \n\n All of this is described in good detail, with-OUT fancy \n complex mathematics, in his books. \n \n\n\n BOOKS of Dewey B. Larson\n \n The following is a complete list of the late Physicist \n Dewey B. Larson's books about his comprehensive GENERAL \n UNIFIED Theory of the physical universe. Some of the early \n books are out of print now, but still available through \n inter-library loan. \n \n \"The Structure of the Physical Universe\" (1959) \n \n \"The Case AGAINST the Nuclear Atom\" (1963)\n \n \"Beyond Newton\" (1964) \n \n \"New Light on Space and Time\" (1965) \n \n \"Quasars and Pulsars\" (1971) \n \n \"NOTHING BUT MOTION\" (1979) \n [A $9.50 SUBSTITUTE for the $8.3 BILLION \"Super \n Collider\".] \n [The last four chapters EXPLAIN chemical bonding.]\n\n \"The Neglected Facts of Science\" (1982) \n \n \"THE UNIVERSE OF MOTION\" (1984)\n [FINAL SOLUTIONS to most ALL astrophysical\n mysteries.] \n \n \"BASIC PROPERTIES OF MATTER\" (1988)\n\n All but the last of these books were published by North \n Pacific Publishers, P.O. Box 13255, Portland, OR 97213, and \n should be available via inter-library loan if your local \n university or public library doesn't have each of them. \n\n Several of them, INCLUDING the last one, are available \n from: The International Society of Unified Science (ISUS), \n 1680 E. Atkin Ave., Salt Lake City, Utah 84106. This is the \n organization that was started to promote Larson's Theory. \n They have other related publications, including the quarterly \n journal \"RECIPROCITY\". \n\n \n\n Physicist Dewey B. Larson's Background\n \n Physicist Dewey B. Larson was a retired Engineer \n (Chemical or Electrical). He was about 91 years old when he \n died in May 1989. He had a Bachelor of Science Degree in \n Engineering Science from Oregon State University. He \n developed his comprehensive GENERAL UNIFIED Theory of the \n physical universe while trying to develop a way to COMPUTE \n chemical properties based only on the elements used. \n \n Larson's lack of a fancy \"PH.D.\" degree might be one \n reason that orthodox physicists are ignoring him, but it is \n NOT A VALID REASON. Sometimes it takes a relative outsider \n to CLEARLY SEE THE FOREST THROUGH THE TREES. At the same \n time, it is clear from his books that he also knew ORTHODOX \n physics and astronomy as well as ANY physicist or astronomer, \n well enough to point out all their CONTRADICTIONS, AD HOC \n ASSUMPTIONS, PRINCIPLES OF IMPOTENCE, IN-CONSISTENCIES, ETC.. \n \n Larson did NOT have the funds, etc. to experimentally \n test his Theory. And it was NOT necessary for him to do so. \n He simply compared the various parts of his Theory with OTHER \n researchers' experimental and observational data. And in \n many cases, HIS explanation FIT BETTER. \n \n A SELF-CONSISTENT Theory is MUCH MORE than the ORTHODOX \n physicists and astronomers have! They CLAIM to be looking \n for a \"unified field theory\" that works, but have been \n IGNORING one for over 30 years now! \n \n \"Modern physics\" does NOT explain the physical universe \n so well. Some parts of some of Larson's books are FULL of \n quotations of leading orthodox physicists and astronomers who \n agree. And remember that \"epicycles\", \"crystal spheres\", \n \"geocentricity\", \"flat earth theory\", etc., ALSO once SEEMED \n to explain it well, but were later proved CONCEPTUALLY WRONG. \n \n \n Prof. Frank H. Meyer, Professor Emeritus of UW-Superior, \n was/is a STRONG PROPONENT of Larson's Theory, and was (or \n still is) President of Larson's organization, \"THE \n INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF UNIFIED SCIENCE\", and Editor of \n their quarterly Journal \"RECIPROCITY\". He moved to \n Minneapolis after retiring. \n \n\n\n \"Super Collider\" BOONDOGGLE!\n \n I am AGAINST contruction of the \"Superconducting Super \n Collider\", in Texas or anywhere else. It would be a GROSS \n WASTE of money, and contribute almost NOTHING of \"scientific\" \n value. \n \n Most physicists don't realize it, but, according to the \n comprehensive GENERAL UNIFIED Theory of the late Physicist \n Dewey B. Larson, as described in his books, the strange GOOFY \n particles (\"mesons\", \"hyperons\", ALLEGED \"quarks\", etc.) \n which they are finding in EXISTING colliders (Fermi Lab, \n Cern, etc.) are really just ATOMS of ANTI-MATTER, which are \n CREATED by the high-energy colliding beams, and which quickly \n disintegrate like cosmic rays because they are incompatible \n with their environment. \n \n A larger and more expensive collider will ONLY create a \n few more elements of anti-matter that the physicists have not \n seen there before, and the physicists will be EVEN MORE \n CONFUSED THAN THEY ARE NOW! \n \n Are a few more types of anti-matter atoms worth the $8.3 \n BILLION cost?!! Don't we have much more important uses for \n this WASTED money?! \n \n \n Another thing to consider is that the primary proposed \n location in Texas has a serious and growing problem with some \n kind of \"fire ants\" eating the insulation off underground \n cables. How much POISONING of the ground and ground water \n with insecticides will be required to keep the ants out of \n the \"Supercollider\"?! \n \n \n Naming the \"Super Collider\" after Ronald Reagon, as \n proposed, is TOTALLY ABSURD! If it is built, it should be \n named after a leading particle PHYSICIST. \n \n\n\n LARSONIAN Anti-Matter\n \n In Larson's comprehensive GENERAL UNIFIED Theory of the \n physical universe, anti-matter is NOT a simple case of \n opposite charges of the same types of particles. It has more \n to do with the rates of vibrations and rotations of the \n photons of which they are made, in relation to the \n vibrational and rotational equivalents of the speed of light, \n which Larson calls \"Unit Velocity\" and the \"Natural Datum\". \n \n In Larson's Theory, a positron is actually a particle of \n MATTER, NOT anti-matter. When a positron and electron meet, \n the rotational vibrations (charges) and rotations of their \n respective photons (of which they are made) neutralize each \n other. \n \n In Larson's Theory, the ANTI-MATTER half of the physical \n universe has THREE dimensions of TIME, and ONLY ONE dimension \n of space, and exists in a RECIPROCAL RELATIONSHIP to our \n MATERIAL half. \n \n\n\n LARSONIAN Relativity\n \n The perihelion point in the orbit of the planet Mercury \n has been observed and precisely measured to ADVANCE at the \n rate of 574 seconds of arc per century. 531 seconds of this \n advance are attributed via calculations to gravitational \n perturbations from the other planets (Venus, Earth, Jupiter, \n etc.). The remaining 43 seconds of arc are being used to \n help \"prove\" Einstein's \"General Theory of Relativity\". \n \n But the late Physicist Dewey B. Larson achieved results \n CLOSER to the 43 seconds than \"General Relativity\" can, by \n INSTEAD using \"SPECIAL Relativity\". In one or more of his \n books, he applied the LORENTZ TRANSFORMATION on the HIGH \n ORBITAL SPEED of Mercury. \n \n Larson TOTALLY REJECTED \"General Relativity\" as another \n MATHEMATICAL FANTASY. He also REJECTED most of \"Special \n Relativity\", including the parts about \"mass increases\" near \n the speed of light, and the use of the Lorentz Transform on \n doppler shifts, (Those quasars with red-shifts greater than \n 1.000 REALLY ARE MOVING FASTER THAN THE SPEED OF LIGHT, \n although most of that motion is away from us IN TIME.). \n \n In Larson's comprehensive GENERAL UNIFIED Theory of the \n physical universe, there are THREE dimensions of time instead \n of only one. But two of those dimensions can NOT be measured \n from our material half of the physical universe. The one \n dimension that we CAN measure is the CLOCK time. At low \n relative speeds, the values of the other two dimensions are \n NEGLIGIBLE; but at high speeds, they become significant, and \n the Lorentz Transformation must be used as a FUDGE FACTOR. \n [Larson often used the term \"COORDINATE TIME\" when writing \n about this.] \n \n \n In regard to \"mass increases\", it has been PROVEN in \n atomic accelerators that acceleration drops toward zero near \n the speed of light. But the formula for acceleration is \n ACCELERATION = FORCE / MASS, (a = F/m). Orthodox physicists \n are IGNORING the THIRD FACTOR: FORCE. In Larson's Theory, \n mass STAYS CONSTANT and FORCE drops toward zero. FORCE is \n actually a MOTION, or COMBINATIONS of MOTIONS, or RELATIONS \n BETWEEN MOTIONS, including INward and OUTward SCALAR MOTIONS. \n The expansion of the universe, for example, is an OUTward \n SCALAR motion inherent in the universe and NOT a result of \n the so-called \"Big Bang\" (which is yet another MATHEMATICAL \n FANTASY). \n \n \n \n THE UNIVERSE OF MOTION\n\n I wish to recommend to EVERYONE the book \"THE UNIVERSE \n OF MOTION\", by Dewey B. Larson, 1984, North Pacific \n Publishers, (P.O. Box 13255, Portland, Oregon 97213), 456 \n pages, indexed, hardcover. \n \n It contains the Astrophysical portions of a GENERAL \n UNIFIED Theory of the physical universe developed by that \n author, an UNrecognized GENIUS, more than thirty years ago. \n \n It contains FINAL SOLUTIONS to most ALL Astrophysical \n mysteries, including the FORMATION of galaxies, binary and \n multiple star systems, and solar systems, the TRUE ORIGIN of \n the \"3-degree\" background radiation, cosmic rays, and gamma-\n ray bursts, and the TRUE NATURE of quasars, pulsars, white \n dwarfs, exploding galaxies, etc.. \n \n It contains what astronomers and astrophysicists are ALL \n looking for, if they are ready to seriously consider it with \n OPEN MINDS! \n \n The following is an example of his Theory's success: \n In his first book in 1959, \"THE STRUCTURE OF THE PHYSICAL \n UNIVERSE\", Larson predicted the existence of EXPLODING \n GALAXIES, several years BEFORE astronomers started finding \n them. They are a NECESSARY CONSEQUENCE of Larson's \n comprehensive Theory. And when QUASARS were discovered, he \n had an immediate related explanation for them also. \n \n\n \n GAMMA-RAY BURSTS\n\n Astro-physicists and astronomers are still scratching \n their heads about the mysterious GAMMA-RAY BURSTS. They were \n originally thought to originate from \"neutron stars\" in the \n disc of our galaxy. But the new Gamma Ray Telescope now in \n Earth orbit has been detecting them in all directions \n uniformly, and their source locations in space do NOT \n correspond to any known objects, (except for a few cases of \n directional coincidence). \n \n Gamma-ray bursts are a NECESSARY CONSEQUENCE of the \n GENERAL UNIFIED Theory of the physical universe developed by \n the late Physicist Dewey B. Larson. According to page 386 of \n his book \"THE UNIVERSE OF MOTION\", published in 1984, the \n gamma-ray bursts are coming from SUPERNOVA EXPLOSIONS in the \n ANTI-MATTER HALF of the physical universe, which Larson calls \n the \"Cosmic Sector\". Because of the relationship between the \n anti-matter and material halves of the physical universe, and \n the way they are connected together, the gamma-ray bursts can \n pop into our material half anywhere in space, seemingly at \n random. (This is WHY the source locations of the bursts do \n not correspond with known objects, and come from all \n directions uniformly.) \n \n I wonder how close to us in space a source location \n would have to be for a gamma-ray burst to kill all or most \n life on Earth! There would be NO WAY to predict one, NOR to \n stop it! \n \n Perhaps some of the MASS EXTINCTIONS of the past, which \n are now being blamed on impacts of comets and asteroids, were \n actually caused by nearby GAMMA-RAY BURSTS! \n \n\n\n LARSONIAN Binary Star Formation\n \n About half of all the stars in the galaxy in the \n vicinity of the sun are binary or double. But orthodox \n astronomers and astrophysicists still have no satisfactory \n theory about how they form or why there are so many of them. \n \n But binary star systems are actually a LIKELY \n CONSEQUENCE of the comprehensive GENERAL UNIFIED Theory of \n the physical universe developed by the late Physicist Dewey \n B. Larson. \n \n I will try to summarize Larsons explanation, which is \n detailed in Chapter 7 of his book \"THE UNIVERSE OF MOTION\" \n and in some of his other books. \n \n First of all, according to Larson, stars do NOT generate \n energy by \"fusion\". A small fraction comes from slow \n gravitational collapse. The rest results from the COMPLETE \n ANNIHILATION of HEAVY elements (heavier than IRON). Each \n element has a DESTRUCTIVE TEMPERATURE LIMIT. The heavier the \n element is, the lower is this limit. A star's internal \n temperature increases as it grows in mass via accretion and \n absorption of the decay products of cosmic rays, gradually \n reaching the destructive temperature limit of lighter and \n lighter elements. \n \n When the internal temperature of the star reaches the \n destructive temperature limit of IRON, there is a Type I \n SUPERNOVA EXPLOSION! This is because there is SO MUCH iron \n present; and that is related to the structure of iron atoms \n and the atom building process, which Larson explains in some \n of his books [better than I can]. \n \n When the star explodes, the lighter material on the \n outer portion of the star is blown outward in space at less \n than the speed of light. The heavier material in the center \n portion of the star was already bouncing around at close to \n the speed of light, because of the high temperature. The \n explosion pushes that material OVER the speed of light, and \n it expands OUTWARD IN TIME, which is equivalent to INWARD IN \n SPACE, and it often actually DISAPPEARS for a while. \n \n Over long periods of time, both masses start to fall \n back gravitationally. The material that had been blown \n outward in space now starts to form a RED GIANT star. The \n material that had been blown OUTWARD IN TIME starts to form a \n WHITE DWARF star. BOTH stars then start moving back toward \n the \"MAIN SEQUENCE\" from opposite directions on the H-R \n Diagram. \n \n The chances of the two masses falling back into the \n exact same location in space, making a single lone star \n again, are near zero. They will instead form a BINARY \n system, orbiting each other. \n \n According to Larson, a white dwarf star has an INVERSE \n DENSITY GRADIENT (is densest at its SURFACE), because the \n material at its center is most widely dispersed (blown \n outward) in time. This ELIMINATES the need to resort to \n MATHEMATICAL FANTASIES about \"degenerate matter\", \"neutron \n stars\", \"black holes\", etc.. \n \n\n\n LARSONIAN Solar System Formation\n\n If the mass of the heavy material at the center of the \n exploding star is relatively SMALL, then, instead of a single \n white dwarf star, there will be SEVERAL \"mini\" white dwarf \n stars (revolving around the red giant star, but probably \n still too far away in three-dimensional TIME to be affected \n by its heat, etc.). These will become PLANETS! \n \n In Chapter 7 of THE UNIVERSE OF MOTION, Larson used all \n this information, and other principles of his comprehensive \n GENERAL UNIFIED Theory of the physical universe, to derive \n his own version of Bode's Law. \n \n\n\n \"Black Hole\" FANTASY!\n\n I heard that physicist Stephen W. Hawking recently \n completed a theoretical mathematical analysis of TWO \"black \n holes\" merging together into a SINGLE \"black hole\", and \n concluded that the new \"black hole\" would have MORE MASS than \n the sum of the two original \"black holes\". \n \n Such a result should be recognized by EVERYone as a RED \n FLAG, causing widespread DOUBT about the whole IDEA of \"black \n holes\", etc.! \n \n After reading Physicist Dewey B. Larson's books about \n his comprehensive GENERAL UNIFIED Theory of the physical \n universe, especially his book \"THE UNIVERSE OF MOTION\", it is \n clear to me that \"black holes\" are NOTHING more than \n MATHEMATICAL FANTASIES! The strange object at Cygnus X-1 is \n just an unusually massive WHITE DWARF STAR, NOT the \"black \n hole\" that orthodox astronomers and physicists so badly want \n to \"prove\" their theory. \n \n \n By the way, I do NOT understand why so much publicity is \n being given to physicist Stephen Hawking. The physicists and \n astronomers seem to be acting as if Hawking's severe physical \n problem somehow makes him \"wiser\". It does NOT! \n \n I wish the same attention had been given to Physicist \n Dewey B. Larson while he was still alive. Widespread \n publicity and attention should NOW be given to Larson's \n Theory, books, and organization (The International Society of \n Unified Science). \n \n \n \n ELECTRO-MAGNETIC PROPULSION\n\n I heard of that concept many years ago, in connection \n with UFO's and unorthodox inventors, but I never was able to \n find out how or why they work, or how they are constructed. \n \n I found a possible clue about why they might work on \n pages 112-113 of the book \"BASIC PROPERTIES OF MATTER\", by \n the late Physicist Dewey B. Larson, which describes part of \n Larson's comprehensive GENERAL UNIFIED Theory of the physical \n universe. I quote one paragraph: \n \n \"As indicated in the preceding chapter, the development \n of the theory of the universe of motion arrives at a totally \n different concept of the nature of electrical resistance. \n The electrons, we find, are derived from the environment. It \n was brought out in Volume I [Larson's book \"NOTHING BUT \n MOTION\"] that there are physical processes in operation which \n produce electrons in substantial quantities, and that, \n although the motions that constitute these electrons are, in \n many cases, absorbed by atomic structures, the opportunities \n for utilizing this type of motion in such structures are \n limited. It follows that there is always a large excess of \n free electrons in the material sector [material half] of the \n universe, most of which are uncharged. In this uncharged \n state the electrons cannot move with respect to extension \n space, because they are inherently rotating units of space, \n and the relation of space to space is not motion. In open \n space, therefore, each uncharged electron remains permanently \n in the same location with respect to the natural reference \n system, in the manner of a photon. In the context of the \n stationary spatial reference system the uncharged electron, \n like the photon, is carried outward at the speed of light by \n the progression of the natural reference system. All \n material aggregates are thus exposed to a flux of electrons \n similar to the continual bombardment by photons of radiation. \n Meanwhile there are other processes, to be discussed later, \n whereby electrons are returned to the environment. The \n electron population of a material aggregate such as the earth \n therefore stabilizes at an equilibrium level.\" \n \n Note that in Larson's Theory, UNcharged electrons are \n also massLESS, and are basically photons of light of a \n particular frequency (above the \"unit\" frequency) spinning \n around one axis at a particular rate (below the \"unit\" rate). \n (\"Unit velocity\" is the speed of light, and there are \n vibrational and rotational equivalents to the speed of light, \n according to Larson's Theory.) [I might have the \"above\" and \n \"below\" labels mixed up.] \n \n Larson is saying that outer space is filled with mass-\n LESS UN-charged electrons flying around at the speed of \n light! \n \n If this is true, then the ELECTRO-MAGNETIC PROPULSION \n fields of spacecraft might be able to interact with these \n electrons, or other particles in space, perhaps GIVING them a \n charge (and mass) and shooting them toward the rear to \n achieve propulsion. (In Larson's Theory, an electrical charge \n is a one-dimensional rotational vibration of a particular \n frequency (above the \"unit\" frequency) superimposed on the \n rotation of the particle.) \n \n The paragraph quoted above might also give a clue to \n confused meteorologists about how and why lightning is \n generated in clouds. \n\n\n\n SUPPRESSION of LARSONIAN Physics\n\n The comprehensive GENERAL UNIFIED Theory of the physical \n universe developed by the late Physicist Dewey B. Larson has \n been available for more than 30 YEARS, published in 1959 in \n his first book \"THE STRUCTURE OF THE PHYSICAL UNIVERSE\". \n \n It is TOTALLY UN-SCIENTIFIC for Hawking, Wheeler, Sagan, \n and the other SACRED PRIESTS of the RELIGION they call \n \"science\" (or \"physics\", or \"astronomy\", etc.), as well as \n the \"scientific\" literature and the \"education\" systems, to \n TOTALLY IGNORE Larson's Theory has they have. \n \n Larson's Theory has excellent explanations for many \n things now puzzling orthodox physicists and astronomers, such \n as gamma-ray bursts and the nature of quasars. \n \n Larson's Theory deserves to be HONESTLY and OPENLY \n discussed in the physics, chemistry, and astronomy journals, \n in the U.S. and elsewhere. And at least the basic principles \n of Larson's Theory should be included in all related courses \n at UW-EC, UW-Madison, Cambridge, Cornell University, and \n elsewhere, so that students are not kept in the dark about a \n worthy alternative to the DOGMA they are being fed. \n \n \n\n For more information, answers to your questions, etc., \n please consult my CITED SOURCES (especially Larson's BOOKS). \n\n\n\n UN-altered REPRODUCTION and DISSEMINATION of this \n IMPORTANT partial summary is ENCOURAGED. \n",
"\nSigh... my version of 'rn' asked me whether I really want to send this\nposting!\n\nYou may as well know that all this stuff about the secret source of the\nClipper announcement is because of a silly mistake. I am the administrator\nof csrc.ncsl.nist.gov, alias first.org. It's a system set up to help out\nthe needs of FIRST, a Forum of Incident Response and Security Teams, which \nincludes a number of world-wide incident response teams such as CERT/CC and\nother places in Europe. As to the VRFY and EXPN commands, they are normally\ndisabled, since early on we didn't want crackers to find out the names of\nincident response folks on our mailing lists. We had a disk crash several\nmonths ago which required completely rebuilding the O/S files - same old\nstory, our backups weren't especially helpful. As you can guess, I didn't\nremember to re-disable VRFY and EXPN until I saw people on the net trying to\nfind out who was behind clipper@csrc... When I saw people's names posted\nhere, I felt it was time to clear things up. So, EXPN and VRFY on csrc have\nalways been disabled in the past for reasons having nothing to do with \nClipper.\n\nI posted the White House announcements at the request of policy folks here\nbecause csrc also provides Usenet service. I posted them from an account\ncalled 'clipper.' I also created an alias called 'clipper' that contains\nthe addresses of members of the NIST Computer Security Privacy and Advisory\nBoard, set up under law of the Computer Security Act of 1987, and addresses\nof other individuals not affiliated with NIST but involved in cryptography,\nsecurity, and privacy - I believe that these individuals were included on\nthis list because NIST felt it important to get them the Clipper information\nfirst-hand.\n\nThe 'clipper' alias is there for the benefit of those named above. It is \nnot a source for information, it was set up solely to monitor any initial\ntraffic. Individuals on the list have requested that they continue to get\ntraffic that is not already duplicated on Usenet.\n\nWhile you can rightfully say we were a bit disorganized in handling this,\nI would ask that people stop speculating about any hidden agendas or motives\nof the individuals on the 'clipper' alias - I've already apologized to them\nfor what's happened. Disabling EXPN and VRFY is an increasingly common\npractice (albeit unfriendly to some), and any effect of disabling it again\nwas unintentional.",
"(References: deleted to move this to a new thread)\n\n\n\n\"To put it as simply as possible: *I am not a Muslim*.[...] I do not\n accept the charge of apostacy, because I have never in my adult life\n affirmed any belief, and what one has not affirmed one can not be\n said to have apostasized from. The Islam I know states clearly that\n 'there can be no coercion in matters of religion'. The many Muslims\n I respect would be horrified by the idea that they belong to their\n faith *purely by virtue of birth*, and that a person who freely chose\n not to be a Muslim could therefore be put to death.\"\n \t \t \t \tSalman Rushdie, \"In Good Faith\", 1990\n\n\"God, Satan, Paradise, and Hell all vanished one day in my fifteenth\n year, when I quite abruptly lost my faith. [...]and afterwards, to\n prove my new-found atheism, I bought myself a rather tasteless ham\n sandwich, and so partook for the first time of the forbidden flesh of\n the swine. No thunderbolt arrived to strike me down. [...] From that\n day to this I have thought of myself as a wholly seculat person.\"\n \t \t \t \tSalman Rushdie, \"In God We Trust\", 1985\n \n\nOnly a functional illiterate with absolutely no conception of the\nnature of the novel could think such a thing. I'll accept it\n(reluctantly) from mobs in Pakistan, but not from you. What is\npresented in the fictional dream of a demented character cannot by the\nwildest stretch of the imagination be considered a reflection on the\nactual Mohammad. What's worse, the novel doesn't present the\nMahound/Mohammed character in any worse light than secular histories\nof Islam; in particular, there is no \"lewd\" misrepresentation of his\nlife or that of his wives.\n\n\nDon't hold back; he's considered an apostate and a blasphemer.\nHowever, it's not for his writing in _The Satanic Verses_, but for\nwhat people have accepted as a propagandistic version of what is\ncontained in that book. I have yet to find *one single muslim* who\nhas convinced me that they have read the book. Some have initially\nclaimed to have done so, but none has shown more knowledge of the book\nthan a superficial Newsweek story might impart, and all have made\nfactual misstatements about events in the book.\n\n\nI'll keep an eye out for it. I have a counter-proposal: I suggest\nthat you see the Viking hardcover by Salman Rushdie called _The\nSatanic Verses_. Perhaps then you'll understand.",
"From: dhammers@pacific.? (David Hammerslag)\n\n\tHow do you (Mormons) reconcile the idea of eternal marriage with \n\tChrist's statement that in the resurrection people will neither \n\tmarry nor be given in marriage (Luke, chapt. 20)?\n\nFootnotes in some bibles reference this verse to the Book of Tobit.\nTobit is in the Septuagint. Goodspeed published it in a book called \n\"The Apocrypha\". Most any bookstore will have this. At any rate, the Jews \nof Christ's day had this book. It is a story mostly centered around the\nson of Tobit who was named Tobias. There was a young lady, Sarah, who had \nentered the bridal chamber with seven brothers in succession. The brothers \nall died in the chamber before consumating the marriage.\n\nTobias was entitled to have Sarah for his wife (3:17) because Tobias was\nher only relative and \"...she was destined for [Tobias] from the beginning\"\n(6:17).\n\nTobias took her to wife and was able to consumate the marriage. The \nseven husbands would not have her as a partner in heaven. That does not \neliminate Tobias, her eighth husband. Tobit is a fun and interesting \nstory to read. It's kind of a mythical romance. It's a little shorter \nthan Esther.\n\nThe LDS also have scriptures that parallel and amplify Luke 20. Most \nnotably Doctrines and Covenants 132:15-16.\n\n\t\"Therefore, if a man marry him a wife in the world, and he marry \n\ther not by me nor by my word, and he covenant with her so long as\n\the is in the world and she with him, their covenant and marriage\n\tare not of force when they are dead, and when they are out of \n\tthe world; therefore, they are not bound by any law when they \n\tare out of the world.\n\n\t\"Therefore, when they are out of the world they neither marry nor \n\tare given in marriage; but are appointed angels in heaven, which\n\tangels are ministering servants, to minister for those who are \n\tworthy of a far more, and an exceeding, and an eternal weight of \n\tglory.\"\n",
"\n\n\tGreg, no flame intended, but you have no discernible sense of\nhumor. What Bill wrote was intended to be funny. It's called a\n\"joke\", Greg. Look into it.\n\tBesides, Kirilian photography is actually photography of my\nfriend's two-year-old son Kiril. Perhaps you meant \"Kirlian\"?\n",
"\n\n:-)\n\nI can just imagine it. The mother is wheeled into the labour ward. After\ndelivery a government agent steps up to read the baby its rights...\n\t\"You have the right to remain silent. If you give up this right anything\n\tyou say may be taken down and used in evidence against you.\"\n\n\t\"Waaaaaaaaah\"\n\n\n--\nAnthony Shipman \"You've got to be taught before it's too late,\nCP Software Export Pty Ltd, Before you are six or seven or eight,\n19 Cato St., East Hawthorn, To hate all the people your relatives hate,\nMelbourne, Australia, 3121 You've got to be carefully taught.\" R&H",
" I read on the BBS a while back thats a BBS may be started for\n Gateway2000. Did a BBS start, and if it did, would you let me\n know the newsgroup name. Please send information by e-mail.\n My e-mail address is joe_west@lds.loral.com. Thanks...joe west.\n\n",
"\n\nWell, here is something I wrote some time ago in response to a\nsimilar question. I hope it helps:\n\n[Begin repeat of previous post]\n\nAs for the scripture mentioned I agree that it does seem to be a \nproblem, not only for eternal marriage but marriage in general. \nLuke's version has Jesus saying that the children of this world \nmarry and are given in marriage but not those who will attain\nthe kingdom of heaven. It almost sounds like marriage disqualifies\none for salvation. (Matthew and Mark both omit this statement.) I\nthink the accounts are not as clear as they might be. Let's have a\nlook at the incident and see if we can come up with some reasonable\nideas of what it means. The scriptures involved are Mat 22:23-30,\nMark 12:18-25, and Luke 20:27-36.\n\nWhat happened was that the Sadducees, who did not believe in the\nresurrection, thought they could trap Jesus. They made reference to\nthe \"Leverite\" marriage which required the brother of a man who died\nwithout children to take the widow to wife and raise up children. \nThe children would be considered children of the deceased, just as\nthough the woman's first husband had fathered them. It seems\nobvious from this that the woman was still considered in a way to be\nthe wife of her first husband. However, the Sadducees concocted a\nscene in which 6 brothers of the deceased each in his turn failed to\nfather children by the widow. They seem to imply that the Leverite\nmarriage was equal to the first for they ask, \"Whose wife shall she\nbe in the resurrection?\" At this point it seems obvious that if she\nis anybody's wife, it is the first husband. After all, had she\nborne children they would have been credited to him regardless of\nwhich brother was the biological father. It is possible Jesus was\nrefering to this when he says, \"Ye do err, not knowing the\nscriptures or the power of God.\" (Mat 22:29, compare Mark 12:24,\nphrase not in Luke's account).\n\nAnyway, the Sadducees ask, \"Whose wife will she be in the\nresurrection, seeing that all 7 had her?\" Jesus answer is that,\n\"In the resurrection they neither marry nor are given in\nmarriage...\" (Mat 22:30) \"When they rise from the dead they neither\nmarry...\" (Mark 12:25) \"They which are accounted worthy to obtain\nthat world neither marry...\" (Luke 20:35) All 3 accounts go on to\nsay, \"but are as the angels in heaven\" or the equivalent. I find\nthis last not very helpful since the Bible does not define angels\nnor give any idea what their life is like. (Some ministers claim\nthat they are sexless, different that humans etc. but I can find no\nBiblical support for this.)",
"The supersonic booms hear a few months ago over I belive San Fran, heading east\nof what I heard, some new super speed Mach 25 aircraft?? What military based\nint he direction of flight are there that could handle a Mach 25aircraft on its\nlanding decent?? Odd question??",
"I'm using a QIC-compatible 250MB streamer, and I really like it.\nBut now a terrible typo in an archive description drives me mad ervery time.\nIs there any software which can rename, or even better, delete such archives?\nAny help really appreciated.\n\n\n",
"SECRET PURPOSE OF FALKLANDS WAR; [with IN-VISIBILITY Technology]\n\nDr. Beter AUDIO LETTER #74 of 80\n\nDigitized by Jon Volkoff, mail address eidetics@cerf.net\n\n\"AUDIO LETTER(R)\" is a registered trademark of Audio Books,\nInc., a Texas corporation, which originally produced this tape\nrecording. Reproduced under open license granted by Audio\nBooks, Inc.\n\n-----------------------------------------------------------------\n\nThis is the Dr. Beter AUDIO LETTER(R), 1629 K St. NW, Washington,\nDC 20006.\n\n Hello, my friends, this is Dr. Beter. Today is April 30,\n1982, and this is my AUDIO LETTER(R) No. 74.\n\n It's now been almost one month since war broke out in the South\nAtlantic. On the surface it seems that it's only a dispute\nbetween Argentina and Great Britain over the barren, wind-swept\nFalkland Islands and South Georgia Island. In reality, it's far\nmore than that.\n\n The so-called Falklands crisis is just the visible tip of a\ngiant military operation. During this month of April 1982,\nfierce naval battles have taken place--not only in the South\nAtlantic but also in the South Pacific. Up to now most of the\nhostilities have been kept under wraps by wartime censorship on\nall sides. But as I say these words, the naval war in the\nSouthern Hemisphere is about to come to the surface.\n\n Beginning today, April 30, a total naval and air blockade of\nthe Falklands by the Royal Navy has begun. At the same time a\ncounterblockade has been declared by Argentina in the same area.\n\n To be effective, a blockade must be imposed over a period of\ntime, but the Royal Navy does not have that much time. Winter is\ncoming on in the South Atlantic, and the British supply lines are\noverextended. Having come this far, Her Majesty's navy cannot\nsimply drop the blockade and sail away in a few weeks time\nwithout drawing blood from Argentina. As a result the British\nwill be forced to undertake military operations very soon no\nmatter how risky they may be.\n\n There is also another reason why the Royal Navy now has no\nchoice but to engage the Argentine forces in combat. That\nreason, my friends, is that the Royal Navy has already suffered\nlosses in secret combat this month. Up to this moment there will\nbe no way to explain away the damage which has been sustained by\nthe British fleet. Only when publicly admitted fighting erupts\nwill the British dare to admit that they have suffered battle\nlosses. To obtain that cover story, the British have no choice\nbut to sail into combat; but in doing so, they will be risking\neven heavier losses on top of those already sustained. In short,\nmy friends, Her Majesty's navy has sailed into a trap.\n\n The events now unfolding in the South Atlantic carry strange,\nironic echoes of the past. For weeks now we've been hearing\ncountless commentators referring to the British task force as an\n\"armada\" (quote). The British of all people ought to be very\nuneasy with that description. The original Spanish Armada 400\nyears ago was renowned as a seemingly invincible fighting force,\nbut it came to grief in a naval disaster so complete that it\nchanged the course of history--and it was none other than the\nEnglish navy that destroyed the Spanish Armada.\n\n The original Spanish Armada put to sea in 1588 during the\nreign of England's Queen Elizabeth I. The Armada was an invasion\nfleet carrying thousands of crack fighting men to invade England. \nThey were met by the daring sea dogs of Sir Francis Drake. Drake\nand his small, fast ships turned the tables on the Spanish Armada\nby changing the rules of battle. The English fleet was equipped\nwith new longer-range guns, and it stayed upwind and out of\nreach. From there the English pounded, smashed, and shattered\nthe big ships of the mighty Armada. When it was all over, barely\nhalf the Spanish fleet was left to limp back to port. Drake's\ndefeat of the Spanish Armada was a shock to the world. It opened\nthe door for England under Queen Elizabeth I to start its\nexpansion into a truly global empire.\n\n Today, 400 years later, history seems to have come full\ncircle. Queen Elizabeth II is witnessing the dismantling of the\nworld empire whose heyday began under Queen Elizabeth I, and now\nthe cultures of England and of Spain are once again in\nconfrontation. Once again a so-called armada is preparing for\ninvasion, but this time the armada is British, not Spanish. Four\nhundred years ago Sir Francis Drake was the hero of the day;\ntoday, the ghost of Francis Drake is once again on the scene.\n\n The South Atlantic war zone is at the eastern end of the Drake\nPassage around the southern tip of South America. The defeat of\nthe Spanish Armada four centuries ago broke the back of Spain's\nnaval supremacy, and now the defeat of the new British armada may\nwell break the back of what remains of the once glorious Royal\nNavy.\n\n My three special topics for this AUDIO LETTER are:\n\nTopic #1--THE MILITARY SECRET OF SOUTH GEORGIA ISLAND\nTopic #2--THE SECRET NAVAL WAR OF THE SOUTHERN HEMISPHERE\nTopic #3--THE ROCKEFELLER FEAR CAMPAIGN AGAINST NUCLEAR WAR.\n\nTopic #1--When the Falkland Islands crisis began early this month\nit looked at first like a tempest in a teapot. For a century and\na half since 1833, the Islands have been controlled by Great\nBritain. During that entire time, British sovereignty over the\nFalklands has been disputed by Argentina. There have been\ncountless threats by Argentina to seize the Islands, which it\ncalls the Malvinas, but the threats have always come to nothing\nin the past and Britain has never even gotten very worried about\nthem.\n\n The Islands are four times as distant from Argentina as Cuba\nis from the United States, and they are not much of a prize. \nAfter 150 years of occupancy, the Falklands are home to fewer\nthan 2,000 British settlers and a lot of sheep. In short, the\nremote Falkland Islands hardly look like something to fight over,\nand yet here we are watching another crisis take place. We are\nwatching as war erupts between Great Britain and Argentina.\n\n The Thatcher government is acting as if it has forgotten all\nabout its usual preoccupation with the Soviet threat at NATO's\ndoorstep. Instead, Britain is throwing almost everything it's\ngot at Argentina---aircraft carriers, cruisers, destroyers,\nsubmarines, assault ships--you name it. Luxury cruise ships have\neven been commissioned and turned into troop carriers overnight. \nWave after wave of additional assault troops have been activated\nand sent to join the fleet even after it sailed. Ships and\nsubmarines have been pulled off station from normal NATO duty and\nsent to reinforce the task force. The initial 40-ship force has\ngrown steadily over the past several weeks into an armada\nnumbering over 70. Over two-thirds of the entire Royal Navy has\nalready been deployed to the South Atlantic off Argentina.\n\n Watching all this, a lot of people are asking: What's this\nfight really all about? The most popular answer suggested in the\nmajor media is \"oil.\" Vast deposits of oil are known to exist\nunder the continental shelf between Argentina and the Falklands,\nbut that has been known for nearly 10 years. In no way does it\nexplain the timing of the sudden military offensive by Argentina\nthis month, and oil explains even less about the Argentine\nseizure of South Georgia Island.\n\n South Georgia Island is 800 miles east of the Falklands with\nno known oil deposits anywhere near it; and compared to South\nGeorgia, the Falklands are an island paradise. South Georgia\nIsland is covered with rugged mountains, treacherous valleys,\nglaciers, and semi-permanent snow. Most of it is uninhabitable. \nOn top of all that, Argentina has absolutely no legal or\nhistorical claim to South Georgia Island. In that respect it\nstands in sharp contrast to the Falklands.\n\n In the early 1830s the Falklands were occupied for a while by\nArgentine colonists. In 1833 the British expelled them and took\nover the Island. For that and other historical reasons,\nArgentina argues that the Falklands really belong to Argentina,\nnot Britain.\n\n But no such argument is possible for South Georgia Island. It\nhas always been controlled by Britain, never by Argentina or\nSpain. The Argentine seizure of South Georgia Island looks even\nmore unreasonable from a military point of view. Argentina's\nleaders are military men and they think in military terms. They\nwere well aware ahead of time that far-off South Georgia Island\ncould not possibly be held for long. By seizing it they were\nsetting themselves up to absorb a military defeat, as the Island\nwas retaken by Britain. So the question is: Why did Argentina's\nmilitary junta bother with the seemingly worthless South Georgia\nIsland at all?\n\n My friends, the answers to all these questions are military,\nnot political or economic. South Georgia Island possesses an\nenormous military secret. It's a giant underground installation\nburied under the mountains at the northwest end of the Island. \nThe real reason for the so-called Falkland crisis is this secret\ninstallation, together with two other similar installations which\nI will describe shortly.\n\n The secret military complexes have been in existence for many\nyears; they are not new. What is new is the accelerated nuclear\nwar timetable of the American Bolshevik war planners here in\nWashington. For the past two months I've been reporting the\ndetails of this new war plan to you as quickly as I can obtain\nand verify them.\n\n The plan calls for NUCLEAR WAR ONE to erupt by September of\nthis year 1982!! It is this fast-approaching nuclear war threat\nthat caused the so-called Falklands crisis to erupt now.\n\n What is going on now is a coordinated effort to spoil part of\nthe Bolshevik grand strategy for the coming nuclear war. The\nmutual enemies of the American Bolsheviks here--namely, the\nRockefeller cartel--and Russia's new rulers in the Kremlin are\nbehind the present crisis. They are trying to ruin Phase #3 of\nthe \"PROJECT Z\" war plan which I revealed last month. That phase\nis to be world domination by the American Bolsheviks after both\nRussia and the United States have been destroyed in NUCLEAR WAR\nONE. As I mentioned last month, the key to this plan is the\nexistence of secret weapons stockpiles in various places around\nthe world.\n\n The American Bolshevik military planners here in America are\nworking with other Bolshevik agents in key military positions of\nother countries to set off war. Having done that, they intend to\nride out the nuclear holocaust they have caused, safe and cozy in\nGovernment war bunkers! When the warring nations finally lie\nsmoldering and exhausted, the Bolsheviks will leave the shattered\nremains of their host countries. They will rendezvous at the\nsecret weapons installations and bring their weapons into the\nopen. They will confront the world with the only remaining\nfresh, up-to-date, powerful military force on earth; and using\nthat military power, they will become the undisputed rulers of\nthe world--that is, they plan to do all this, and they plan to\npave the way for world domination very soon by setting off\nNUCLEAR WAR ONE in a matter of months. The Rockefeller cartel\nand Russia's new anti-Bolshevik rulers are working together in a\nrace against time to try to head off the Bolshevik war plan.\n\n Last month I mentioned that the Bolsheviks here are\nbenefitting from war preparations which were started by the\nRockefellers long ago. It has only been about three years since\nthe Rockefellers were dislodged as the prime movers of the United\nStates Government by the Bolsheviks. Since that time the United\nStates Government has been a house divided, torn by internal\npower struggles between rival Bolshevik and Rockefeller factions. \nBut before that, the United States had been dominated for decades\nboth economically and politically by the Four Rockefeller\nBrothers.\n\n In 1961 the Brothers launched a new long-range plan for world\ndomination. It was a two-prong strategy, half visible and half\nsecret, which I first described long ago in AUDIO LETTER No. 28. \nIt was a plan for the United States to arm to the teeth in secret\nwhile appearing to disarm gradually. Without repeating all the\ndetails, the basic idea was grandiose yet simple. By\ndeliberately appearing weak, the Rockefeller-controlled United\nStates would maneuver itself into a nuclear war with Russia. \nThen the secret weapons, including superweapons, would be\nunleashed to smash Russia and take over the world.\n\n When they set the grand plan in motion in 1961, the\nRockefeller Brothers were looking ahead to a nuclear war by the\nlate 1970s. Their military analysts concluded very early that\nthe war being planned would have very different effects on the\nNorthern and Southern Hemispheres. Both superpowers, the United\nStates and the Soviet Union, are located well up in the Northern\nHemisphere; so are the other full-fledged nuclear powers--Great\nBritain, France, Red China, and India. By contrast, the\nstrategic targets for nuclear war in the Southern Hemisphere are\nrelatively few and far between. In other words, it was expected\nthat the coming nuclear war would be essentially a Northern\nHemisphere war.\n\n In an all-out nuclear holocaust it is known that serious\nradioactive fallout will gradually spread to affect even areas\nnot initially hit by war. But there are limits to how far the\nwar clouds can spread. It was discovered long ago that there is\nvery little mixing between the air of the Northern and Southern\nHemispheres. In the northern half of our planet, cold air from\nthe North Pole works its way southward towards the equator, then\nit works its way back to the north as warm air. A mirror image\nof this process takes up the southern half of the planet. \nNorthern and Southern Hemisphere air meet in the equatorial zone,\nbut very little of the air changes places.\n\n The military conclusion, my friends, is this: the coming\nnuclear war could ruin large areas of the Northern Hemisphere for\ngenerations to come; but if the calculations are right, the\nSouthern Hemisphere could escape virtually unaffected by the war. \nThis was music to the ears of the Four Rockefeller Brothers. A\nquick look at the globe of the world shows why. The Rockefeller\ncartel has dominated Latin America ever since World War II. As I\ndiscussed in my very first monthly AUDIO LETTER, Nelson\nRockefeller solidified the cartel grip on Latin America during\nthe war. He accomplished this as so-called \"Coordinator of\nHemispheric Defense\" for then-President Franklin D. Roosevelt. \nSo that takes care of the South American continent and its\nnatural resources.\n\n Then there is the African continent. There, too, Rockefeller\ncontrol was already in effect over wide areas of Black Africa,\nespecially south of the equator. All this was thanks to the\nefforts of John D. Rockefeller III, as I detailed in AUDIO LETTER\nNo. 36.\n\n Looking around the globe, the most important remaining land\nmasses from the standpoint of world domination are Australia and\nNew Zealand. Thanks to World War II, both were wide open to the\nRockefellers.\n\n The Rockefeller Brothers decided to establish secret military\ninstallations in the Southern Hemisphere for use after the coming\nwar. By this means they expected to become the masters of the\nsurviving southern half of planet Earth after the Northern\nHemisphere war. Then, as the Northern Hemisphere gradually\nrecovered from the nuclear holocaust, the Rockefeller empire\nwould be able to pick up the pieces. In this way the third\ngeneration Rockefeller Brothers expected their family dynasty to\ninherit the Earth.\n\n In order to control the Southern Hemisphere militarily after\nthe war, some means would have to be available to project\nmilitary power onto any land mass. For example, revolts against\nRockefeller domination would require troops--not a blast from the\nbeam weapons on the Moon. The most critical factor for postwar\nmilitary domination of the world was found to be a navy. A\nminimum of two secret naval fleets would be required--one based\nin the South Atlantic, the other in the South Pacific. Since the\nreserve naval fleets were to be kept secret until after the\nNorthern Hemisphere nuclear war, they could not be built in\nexisting shipyards. New construction facilities had to be built\nand they had to be hidden. To hide an entire shipyard is no\nsmall task; they take up a lot of space. On top of that, it was\nessential that the ships remain hidden after they were built. \nThe best way to achieve that was to combine the shipyard and\nnaval base into one over-all secret installation. Finally, the\nsecret naval installation had to be invulnerable to nuclear\nattack; otherwise if its existence were ever discovered\nprematurely, the secret navy might be wiped out.\n\n The combined requirements for secrecy, space, and protection\nagainst attack were formidable; but one day in 1959, while all\nthese plans were still in the early stages of development, the\nanswer presented itself. During a so-called banking trip to\nSweden, David Rockefeller was given a tour of a unique hidden\nnaval port. The port is hollowed out from solid granite cliffs\nwhich come right down to the water. The entrance to the port is\na gigantic hole in the side of the cliff which can be sealed off\nwith enormous steel doors. Inside this big doorway on the water\na huge cavity has been hollowed out to accommodate ships.\n\n The Rockefeller Brothers and their military adviser decided\nthat a bigger, more secret, better protected version of the\nSwedish hidden port was just what they wanted. A survey of\ncandidate sites was then initiated. The site survey covered\ncoastal areas throughout the Southern Hemisphere. Many areas\nwere rejected very quickly because the topography was wrong. \nOther areas were rejected because they were too close to the\nequator. Still others had to be ruled out because there were too\nmany people living nearby, making the desired level of secrecy\nimpossible. Finally, it was essential that the sites chosen for\nthe secret naval installations be totally secure politically.\n\n At last the sites for the secret naval installations were\nselected. In the South Pacific, extreme southern New Zealand was\nselected. This is what I was alluding to in AUDIO LETTER No. 71\nthree months ago when I called attention to New Zealand's extreme\nimportance in the coming war.\n\n In order to obtain the necessary space, the secret New Zealand\nnaval installation had to be divided up into two sites located\nclose together. One is at the extreme southwest tip of South\nIsland where the mountain range known as the Southern Alps comes\ndown virtually to the water's edge. The other part of the\ninstallation is built into the northwest tip of Stewart Island,\nwhich is off the tip of South Island. The Stewart Island\nfacility is hollowed out within a rise known as Mt. Anglem.\n\n The New Zealand location met all the requirements. Ever since\nWorld War II the government of New Zealand has been tied even\ncloser to the United States than to Great Britain. The location\nis far from the equator, and the installations are buried deep\nunder mountains, protected from nuclear attack. They are also\ntoo deep to be reached by particle-beam attacks, and the New\nZealand site is well situated to command the entire South\nPacific.\n\n In the South Atlantic an even more perfect site was found. \nThat site, my friends, is South Georgia Island. It is located\nperfectly for naval domination of the entire South Atlantic. The\ntall, rugged mountains provided a perfect location for the secret\ninstallation at the northwest tip of the 100-mile long island. \nIt is controlled by Great Britain whose government, like that of\nNew Zealand, was willing to cooperate; and South Georgia Island\nwas virtually uninhabited except for a whaling station on the\nnortheast coast. The whaling station was some 50 miles away from\nthe secret new installation which was being built, but Britain\ntook no chances. In 1965 the whaling station was closed down. \nSince that time there have been no inhabitants on South Georgia\nIsland except for a few dozen alleged Antarctic scientists.\n\n Construction of the secret naval facilities--two in New\nZealand, one on South Georgia Island--began in the early 1960's. \nThe techniques were adapted from those used previously to build\nother large underground facilities, such as the NORAD\ninstallation inside Cheyenne Mountain, Colorado; however these\ntechniques were adapted in radically new ways to achieve\nconstruction access directly from the sea instead of overland. \nIn this way, the sheltering mountain was left undisturbed in\nappearance both during and after construction.\n\n The cuts in the mountain side which were necessary to let\nships in and out were kept as small as possible and were well\ncamouflaged. Like the Swedish hidden naval port arrangement, the\nentrances to the secret installations can be sealed up. When\nsealed, the entrance is virtually impossible to detect unless you\nknow exactly where it is; and unlike most large construction\nprojects, there are no tailings or piles of leftover rock lying\naround to attract attention. The man-made caverns which house\nthe secret naval installations are enormous, but all the rock and\ndebris was disposed of at sea.\n\n Once the secret naval facilities were built, they had to be\noutfitted for ship construction and docksite storage. The fake\ndisarmament of the United States during the 1960s contributed\ngreatly to this task. From 1961 to 1968 one man played a pivotal\nrole in this elaborate Rockefeller scheme. He was then-Secretary\nof Defense Robert McNamara. All through the 60's McNamara\npresided over the public paring back of America's visible\nmilitary power. This included the closing down and dismantling\nof entire shipyards. What we were not told was where all that\nshipyard equipment went afterwards. Where it went, my friends,\nwas to the new secret installations which were being outfitted in\nNew Zealand and South Georgia Island!\n\n The secret naval installations have been used as duplication\nfacilities to reproduce certain ships and submarines designed and\nbuilt here in the United States. As Defense Secretary Caspar\nWeinberger told Congress recently, it is cheaper to build two\nships at a time. That is especially true if the second ship is\nan exact duplicate of the first. This has become even more true\nin recent years through the use of computerized manufacturing\ntechniques.\n\n The secret naval fleets which have been built at the secret\ninstallations are made up of duplicates--exact duplicates of\ncertain other ships and submarines. They are all nuclear\npowered--nuclear \"subs\"; nuclear cruisers; nuclear destroyers;\nand yes, nuclear aircraft carriers, three of them. A secret twin\nwas built for the U.S.S. Nimitz, for the U.S.S. Eisenhower, and\nfor the newly-launched U.S.S. Carl Vincent. All have been\nfinanced through the gigantic cost overruns, so called, that we\nconstantly hear about in the Defense Department; and all three\ncarriers have been provided with a full complement of aircraft\nwhose manufacture was financed the same way!\n\n The ships of the secret American Bolshevik naval fleets are\nall duplicates of other nuclear-powered vessels. Even so, the\nsecret naval ships possess one key difference.\n\n Last month I revealed that the so-called \"Stealth Program\" has\nsucceeded in developing a kind of electromagnetic invisibility\nshield. This technique makes an object invisible from a distance\nby distorting light waves in its vicinity.\n\n A whole new fleet of Phantom war-planes are now going into\ncrash production that use this principle; and, my friends, all of\nthe secret American Bolshevik navy ships have already been\noutfitted with similar Stealth-field equipment! The Stealth\nprinciple is actually easier to apply to ships than to airplanes\nbecause there is more room for the powerful equipment that\ngenerates the field.\n\n After NUCLEAR WAR ONE, the secret Stealth navy of the American\nBolsheviks would be light years ahead of any other navy left on\nearth. It would be perfect for the intended role of world\ndomination. The Rockefellers set it all in motion long ago, my\nfriends, but three years ago they lost control of the United\nStates Military. Now it's the American Bolsheviks who are in\ncontrol, and they are bent on war.\n\n These secret naval installations have precipitated what is\nbeing called the \"Falklands crisis.\"\n\nTopic #2--In AUDIO LETTER(R) No. 73 last month I described\n\"PROJECT Z\", the new Bolshevik three-phase strategy for NUCLEAR\nWAR ONE.\n\n An elite group of American Bolshevik military planners here\nare flushing out the plan right now at a secret war-room here in\nWashington. It's a plan by which the United States will strike\nthe first nuclear blow, followed by all-out thermonuclear war\nwith Russia.\n\n Having set off the holocaust, the Bolsheviks here and in\ncertain other countries plan to rise it out safe in comfortable\nwar bunkers. Finally after NUCLEAR WAR ONE fizzles out in\nstalemate, they plan to leave behind the ashes of the United\nStates and her allies. Activating Phase #3 of their grand\nstrategy, they plan to unveil their secret weapons, especially\ntheir secret naval fleets. With these they plan to conquer and\nrule what is left of the world. The United States as we know it\nwill be dead and gone; but in the eyes of the Bolsheviks\nthemselves, this outcome will constitute victory.\n\n Up to now the nuclear war timetable which I first revealed two\nmonths ago is still on track. They are still shooting for\nnuclear war to begin by September of this year 1982! Time is\nfast running out.\n\n The Bolsheviks here are sprinting as fast as they can toward\nwar; but, my friends, the Bolsheviks are not the only runners in\nthis race. They have two deadly enemies, both of whom are\nequally determined to trip up the Bolsheviks. One enemy of the\nBolsheviks here is the Rockefeller cartel; the other enemy is the\nnew anti-Bolshevik ruling clique in Russia; and now these two\nmutual enemies of the Bolsheviks are pooling their efforts in\ncertain ways.\n\n In AUDIO LETTER No. 71 three months ago I reported that a\nlimited, new anti-Bolshevik coalition was in the works between\nthe Rockefeller cartel and the Russians. The January 26 meeting\nbetween Haig and Gromyko in Geneva, Switzerland, was a turning\npoint in the formation of this coalition. It is now a reality,\nand is responsible for the so-called \"Falkland crisis\" now\ndominating the headlines. It should be emphasized that this new\nrelationship between the Rockefeller cartel and Russia falls far\nshort of a true alliance. They have very major disputes to be\nsettled between them, but for the time being they have called a\ntruce between themselves to deal with their mutual deadly\nenemy--the Bolsheviks here in America.\n\n The first priority of the Russians and the Rockefellers is to\nslow down the Bolshevik preparations for imminent nuclear war. \nIf they can do that, time is on the side of the Rockefeller\ncartel in certain political movements which I discussed last\nsummer in AUDIO LETTER No. 67. A slow-down in the nuclear war\ntimetable will also give more breathing space for additional\nanti-Bolshevik actions to be implemented.\n\n The joint Rockefeller-Russian planners decided by mid-February\nthat military action against the Bolsheviks was essential very\nquickly. No other type of action had any hope of taking effect\nfast enough to prevent nuclear war by the end of this summer.\n\n The exact details of the \"PROJECT Z\" war plan are not known to\neither the Rockefellers or the Russians, but the general outlines\nare known to be as I described last month.\n\n It was decided that military action should be devised that\nwould undermine Phase #3 of the Bolshevik war plan--that is, the\nBolshevik-controlled secret naval installations and fleets in the\nSouthern Hemisphere should be attacked and crippled. By working\ntogether, the Rockefeller cartel and the Russians were able to\ndevise an attack plan which neither could have carried out alone. \nThe Rockefeller group, who built and originally controlled these\nbases, provided detailed Intelligence about the best way to\nattack them. The Russians with their enormous military machine\nprovided the muscle to actually carry out the attack.\n\n It was essential to devise a scheme that would enable both\nsecret fleets in the South Atlantic and South Pacific to be\nattacked. Survival intact of either fleet would leave the\nBolshevik war plan still workable.\n\n Military analysts concluded very quickly that a direct assault\non the New Zealand facilities was out of the question. There was\nno combination of commandos, frogmen, or other military force\nwhich could possibly keep an attack secret from the outside\nworld. Any attack on the New Zealand bases would set off the\nvery war which the Rockefellers and Russians want to prevent.\n\n But the situation in the South Atlantic was a different\nmatter. In a way, the greatest asset of South Georgia Island was\nalso its Achilles' heel. The extreme isolation which protected\nthe secrecy of the South Georgia base also made a covert military\nassault feasible. The key lay with Argentina and her\nlong-standing claims to the Falkland Islands.\n\n As I mentioned in Topic #1, the Rockefeller cartel has\ndominated all of Latin America for decades. Cartel operatives\nwere sent to Argentina to work out a deal with the government\nmilitary junta there. The historic dispute over the Falkland\nIslands was to be used to provide a ruse, a military cover, to\nenable the South Georgia base to be attacked. The Argentine\ngenerals were not told everything about the situation by any\nmeans, but they were told enough to make clear what they were to\ndo.\n\n As an inducement to cooperate, the Argentine leaders were\npromised handsome rewards. They were guaranteed that after the\nshooting was over, the Falkland Islands would remain in Argentine\nhands. This guarantee included the promise of covert military\nassistance as needed against the Royal Navy. And to bolster the\ntroubled Argentine economy, it was promised that the Rockefeller\ncartel will help develop the immense offshore oil reserves. With\nthese combined promises of military glory and financial rewards,\nthe Argentine military junta agreed to the plan.\n\n On March 19 Argentina carried out Act #1 in the joint attack\nplan. A group of Argentine scrap-metal merchants, of all things,\nlanded at the abandoned old whaling station on South Georgia\nIsland. Supposedly they were there to dismantle the old\nbuildings and cart them off to sell. While they were at it they\nalso raised the Argentine flag over the work-site. The British,\nalways nervous about South Georgia Island, promptly reacted as\nexpected. The British Antarctic survey ship \"Endurance\" put 22\nMarines ashore. They drove off the scrap merchants and tore down\nthe Argentine flag.\n\n The incident provided the desired excuse for the Argentine\nJunta to bring the simmering 150-year-old Falklands dispute to a\nboil. From time to time in the past, Argentina has claimed that\nSouth Georgia is part of the Falklands because it is administered\nthat way by Britain. That argument is very flimsy but it now\ncame in very handy. It was nothing new to hear this from\nArgentine leaders, so there was no hint of what was really afoot.\n\n During late March, Argentine military forces started\nassembling for an assault on the Falklands. \"Nothing new\",\nthought the British high command. Argentina has carried out\nthreatening maneuvers in the past many times. It was believed\nthat they were about to do it again; but on April 2 Argentine\nforces did the unexpected. After many past false alarms, this\ntime they actually invaded and seized the Islands. All Argentine\npublic statements emphasized the long-standing historical claims\nto the Falklands themselves; but just for good measure, the next\nday a small Argentine force also seized far-off South Georgia\nIsland. The force was so small that it gave the appearance\ninitially that it was just a side show from Argentina's point of\nview; however, the small contingent of 22 Royal Marines were\noverpowered and bundled off the Island along with a group of 13\nalleged scientists. That was the moment of payoff in the joint\nRockefeller-Russian attack plan.\n\n Thanks to the elaborate distraction staged by the Argentine\nforces, a special commando team got onto the Island undetected. \nBased on the detailed Rockefeller information about the base, the\nteam moved to a location on the mountain directly above the\ncavernous secret base. Special high-speed drilling equipment was\nset up by the Rockefeller members of the team while the Russian\nmembers concentrated on military defense. By late that evening,\nApril 3, the military high command in London finally learned what\nwas really taking place. The secret South Georgia base was under\nattack by virtually the only means possible. The joint\nRockefeller-Russian team were drilling a shaft down through the\nmountain toward the hollowed out cavern inside. It was only a\nmatter of time until their drill would break through the ceiling\nof the giant hidden naval base. Once the hole was made, the next\nstep was obvious. The Rockefeller-Russian team would put a\nweapon of some kind through the hole. The best guess was that it\nwould be a nerve gas.\n\n The shock waves that went through the highest levels of the\nBritish government on the evening of April 3 can hardly be\ndescribed, my friends. The Thatcher government, like the\nso-called Reagan Administration here in America, is Bolshevik\ncontrolled. That's why Margaret Thatcher always says, \"Me, too\"\nany time the Reagan Administration says or does anything against\nRussia. Both governments are party to the secret nuclear war\nplan in complete betrayal of the people of their respective\ncountries, and on the evening of April 3 they suddenly discovered\nthat their precious war plan was in deep, deep trouble.\n\n Immediately the Thatcher government started assembling a naval\narmada to sail for the South Atlantic. Haste was the order of\nthe day. The drilling on South Georgia Island was proceeding\naround the clock. The best estimates were that the drilling\nwould break through into the roof of the naval base in about\nthree weeks, on or about April 24. If help did not reach South\nGeorgia by then, the secret installation might be doomed. The\nforces stationed at the installation itself were unable to defend\nthemselves under the circumstances. Their mighty naval ships\nwere ships in a bottle. They did not dare open the bottle to\nsail out to fight because the Russian commandos were armed with\ntactical and nuclear weapons. To open the blast-proof entrance\ndoors would be suicide.\n\n On April 5, just two days after South Georgia Island was\nseized, some 40 naval ships began moving out of British ports. \nThe same day Lord Carrington was sacked as Foreign Minister. He\nwas forced to resign, my friends, because he had assisted the\nRockefeller attack plan by downplaying the Argentine attack\npreparations.\n\n That same day, April 5, New Zealand, the home of the other\nsecret naval fleet, broke diplomatic relations with Argentina. \nThe two hidden New Zealand facilities had been placed on \"Red\nAlert.\" As a precautionary measure, all submarines at the twin\nbase were ordered to sea. Several surface ships were already at\nsea undergoing \"sea trials\", but that still left seven (7) major\nships inside the hidden twin naval base including one of the\nnuclear aircraft carriers I mentioned earlier.\n\n On that busy day of April 5, Argentina's Foreign Minister,\nCosta Mendez, was at the United Nations in New York. He was\nalarmed by the deployment of such a large part of the Royal Navy. \nCosta Mendez hurried here to Washington to seek reassurances from\ncertain officials. He got them!\n\n For the next two weeks or so the news was filled with stories\nabout the allegedly slow movement of the British fleet while\nnegotiations went on. That, my friends, was only a cover story. \nThe Royal Navy was actually joining up and moving as rapidly as\npossible toward South Georgia Island. If the task force arrived\nin time to save the secret base, a major battle was likely. The\nofficial stories about \"slow movement\" of the British armada were\nintended to give a cushion of time for that battle. If need be,\nthe fleet would have several days to retake South Georgia Island,\nthen it could move on to arrive near the Falklands on the\nannounced schedule. In this way the crucial importance of South\nGeorgia Island would be hidden and the big secret preserved.\n\n It was initially expected that advance elements of the British\nfleet would reach the vicinity of South Georgia Island within two\nweeks. That would have been soon enough to attack the joint\nRockefeller-Russian commando team and stop the drilling before it\nwas completed. But Russian Cosmospheres and submarines made a\nshambles of the plan.\n\n Key advance elements of the South Georgia attack contingent\nleft Ascension Island early April 14, two days before it was\nannounced officially. Shortly after they did so, they ran into\ntrouble. Russian Cosmospheres and attack submarines closed in on\na single ship which was critical to the planned counterassault on\nSouth Georgia Island. The Cosmospheres bombarded the bridge and\ncombat information center of the ship with neutron radiation. In\nmoments the ship was without any command, its communications and\nradar silenced. Then a Russian \"sub\" closed in and quickly\nfinished off this key British ship with torpedoes. It broke\napart with secondary explosions and sank rapidly. So far as is\nknown, there were no survivors.\n\n This unexpected shock in the mid-Atlantic produced two\nresults, both important:\n\nFirst, it caused a slowdown in the race toward the South Atlantic\nby the British armada. The task force had to be regrouped into a\nconfiguration better suited for an enroute defense, but that cost\nvaluable time. Public announcements from London about the\nprogress of the fleet reflected this slowdown. The timetable for\narrival on battle stations near the Falklands started stretching\nout longer and longer. All this bought extra time for the joint\ncommando team on South Georgia Island. The drilling continued.\n\nThe other result of the sinking was equally important. Word was\nflashed to the South Pacific Stealth navy to prepare for possible\naction. It was obvious that the Russian Navy was getting\ninvolved in the Atlantic, which meant that the Royal Navy could\nbe in big trouble. During the dead of night, early April 15, the\nseven Stealth ships put to sea from their twin secret bases in\nsouthern New Zealand. They deployed to a secret operational\nheadquarters area in the Antipodes Islands, 450 miles southeast\nof New Zealand. Their electromagnetic shields were operating to\nprovide protection from attack. These shields make it impossible\nto communicate with the outside world or even to see it, as I\nexplained last month; but once they arrived at the Antipodes, the\nStealth ships hooked up to buoys equipped with shielded\ncommunication cables to the Island headquarters. The Antipodes\nheadquarters, in turn, was in constant touch with the South\nGeorgia base by way of a transoceanic cable around the tip of\nSouth America. The deployment of the available ships of the\nSouth Pacific Stealth fleet was exactly what the joint\nRockefeller-Russian planners had hoped for. The ships had been\nflushed out from their essentially invulnerable hiding place in\nNew Zealand!\n\n The British ship's sinking of April 14 was also followed by\nother events. On April 15 the Argentine Navy started moving out\nof port. The same day, Alexander Haig arrived again in Buenos\nAires. Supposedly he was there as a diplomat, but in reality he\nwas there as a General, dealing with Generals. Haig is the top\nGovernmental operative of the Rockefeller cartel, as I have\nrevealed in the past. He was making sure that the Argentines did\nnot get cold feet and back down at that critical moment. Four\ndays later, April 19, Haig left for Washington. As he boarded\nhis plane, Haig somberly told reporters, \"Time is running out.\" \nAnd so it was, my friends, for the secret South Georgia base.\n\n The very next day, April 20, the drill broke through into the\nhollowed-out cavern of the naval base. Bolshevik military\nanalysts in London had not expected that it could be completed\nuntil at least the following weekend. The British fleet was\nstill out of range.\n\n The weapon which the commando team inserted down through the\nlong hole was a small, compact Russian neutron bomb. When it was\ndetonated inside the confines of the huge artificial cave, the\neffects were devastating. The intense radiation instantly killed\neveryone inside the base. Also the heat and blast effects of the\nbomb are believed to have damaged all the ships inside\nsufficiently to badly disable them.\n\n Meanwhile, Russian Cosmospheres and submarines were converging\non the Stealth ships which were near the Antipodes Islands\nawaiting orders. From a distance, the ships were invisible to\nthe eye due to their protective shields, which also protect\nagainst beam-weapon attack; but they were sitting ducks for the\ntactics which the Russians employed.\n\n Floating overhead, the Cosmospheres located the seven ships\nusing their Psychoenergetic Range-Finding equipment known as PRF. \nAs I have reported in the past, there is no method known by which\nPRF can be jammed. The Cosmospheres radioed the exact locations\nof the ships to the attack submarines. The \"subs\" were armed\nwith special non-homing, non-nuclear torpedoes designed to\nexplode on impact. More sophisticated torpedoes would have been\nthrown off course or detonated prematurely by the protective\nshield of each ship; but these simple torpedoes just cruise right\nthrough each invisibility field to strike the ship and explode. \nWithin 15 minutes after the attack began, all seven Bolshevik\nStealth ships were on their way to the bottom, and with them went\ntheir Bolshevik Commanders and mercenary crews collected from\naround the world.\n\n The South Pacific action took place just after sunset local\ntime. The time here in Washington was around 2:00 P.M. April 23. \nThat evening Secretary of State Haig was seen briefly in public\nwith the new British Foreign Minister, Francis Pym. Pym was\nwearing the artificial pseudo-smile which diplomats are taught\nalways to display in public. But not Haig. Haig was grinning\nfrom ear to ear, and no wonder. The joint Rockefeller-Russian\nmilitary operation had been a brilliant success. The secret\nBolshevik South Atlantic fleet had been virtually wiped out,\nbottled up inside South Georgia Island; and the South Pacific\nfleet, while not totally wiped out, had been badly crippled. By\nworking together, the Rockefeller cartel and the Russians had won\nthe secret naval war of the Southern Hemisphere.\n\nTopic #3--As I say these words, news reports give the impression\nthat war is about to erupt in the South Atlantic, but the real\nwar in the Southern Hemisphere is already over. What we are\nwatching now is the beginning of its bloody aftermath. That\naftermath is the battle for the Falkland Islands. They have been\npromised to Argentina as a reward for her role in the secret war.\n\n At this moment the Bolsheviks here in Washington are pressing\nfor a public announcement that the United States will side with\nBritain. As soon as that takes place, military action will heat\nup fast around the Falklands. Britain has no choice but to\nfight. She has already suffered casualties which cannot be\nexplained without a public battle; but by fighting, the\nBolsheviks in Britain are running the risk of a humiliating and\ntragic defeat for the Royal Navy.\n\n Meanwhile, the Rockefeller strategists here are now\nconcentrating on a fast-building, anti-nuclear-war campaign. On\nall sides now we are hearing about the so-called \"nuclear freeze\nmovement.\" There are documentaries, articles, publicity of all\nkinds to sensitize us to the terrors of nuclear war. In recent\nmonths, there have even been referenda popping up on election\nballots dealing with the nuclear war issue. Medical doctors are\nbanding together to warn the public about what would happen if\nthere were a nuclear war.\n\n We are being told that all this is just popping up\nspontaneously. We are now 37 years into the nuclear age and\nnothing like this has ever gained so much momentum before, yet\nnow we are supposed to believe that millions of Americans have\nspontaneously gotten the same ideas at the same time. If you\nbelieve that, my friends, I give up. Movements like this never,\nand I mean never, develop without leadership, organization, and\nmoney--and plenty of it.\n\n What we are watching is the Rockefeller public relations\nmachine at work. As I've explained in the past, the Rockefeller\ncartel cannot afford to let a nuclear war take place. If it\ndoes, they will lose everything because they are not in a\nposition to control it. Instead, the deadly enemies of the\nRockefeller cartel, the Bolsheviks here, will win out if there is\na war; and so the Rockefeller faction is now doing everything in\nits power to prevent a nuclear war.\n\n The present anti-nuclear-war orientation of the Rockefeller\ncartel creates certain temporary common interests between them\nand Russia; but as Russia's new rulers know very well, this does\nnot spring from any great moral perspective on the part of the\nRockefeller group. It's purely a matter of practical necessity\nright now for the Rockefellers.\n\n The Russians regard the United States as a house divided, and\nthey are exploiting that division by working in careful ways with\nthe Rockefellers. Their first priority is to rid the world of\nthe deadly Bolshevik menace of all-out, even suicidal, nuclear\nwar; but once that is done, they know that there will be a day of\nreckoning with the Rockefeller cartel some day.\n\n The Rockefeller group is working toward a definite objective\nwith their new anti-nuclear-war propaganda. That objective is\nrenewed power--and power that moves them closer to their old\ndream of WORLD GOVERNMENT. The Bolsheviks here have unwittingly\nprovided fertile ground for the powerful new Rockefeller antiwar\ncampaign. Under Bolshevik control, the so-called Reagan\nAdministration has become so hawkish that it's scaring people. \nThe Rockefeller antiwar campaign is designed to capitalize on\nthat latent fear as a tool of power.\n\n These days the smell of war is in the air. The Falklands\ncrisis is helping to make that more intense. The Rockefeller\npropaganda machine is now paving the way for the argument that\nsurrender of sovereignty is the only way to avoid war. A new\nsuper-United Nations of sorts is now in the works to fill the\nbill. It will have teeth! As presently envisioned, the new\norganization will be based in Geneva, Switzerland. The working\nname, though this may be changed, is the \"World Nonproliferation\nCouncil.\" The plan is to bring it into being as the outgrowth of\nnuclear nonproliferation treaties, but its true purpose will be\nto use fear--the fear of war--to control us all.\n\n LAST MINUTE SUMMARY\n\n Now it's time for my Last Minute Summary. In this AUDIO\nLETTER I have reported on the reasons behind the so-called\nFalkland Islands crisis. The crisis erupted because of secret\nBolshevik-controlled naval installations in the Southern\nHemisphere. These have been attacked by joint action of the\nRockefeller cartel and the Russians in an attempt to slow down\nthe nuclear-war timetable. The attacks were successful, but the\nresults remain to be seen. One result, though, is that the Royal\nNavy has now been drawn into a trap. Britain's Waterloo at sea\nmay well be at hand.\n\n My friends, two factions are struggling for control over our\nUnited States--the Rockefeller cartel and the Bolsheviks. They\ndiffer in style but both seek to control us through fear. If we\nare ever to rise above their trickery, it must be through the\npower of our Lord Jesus Christ, our only hope. As the Scripture\ntells us, our Lord \"...has not given us the spirit of fear; but\nof power, of love, and of a sound mind.\" We must learn to wage\npeace. As our Lord declared long ago, \"Blessed are the\npeacemakers: for they shall be called sons of God.\"",
"\n STILL, the Angel Gabriel's greetings was:\n \"Hail Mary, full of grace, the Lord is with you.\n Blessed art thou amongst women\".\n\n Even Mary was confused about this greeting.",
"I have recently graduated and am looking to move into a bigger house,\nleaving me with a condo to sell... It was originally listed at\n59,000, but is now listed at $54,900. The following is a list of\nfeatures.\n\nMaster Bedroom \t14x11\nBedroom\t\t11x10\nLiving Room\t16x13\nDining Room\t10x9\nKitchen\t\t9x11 w/ extra cabinets\n1 Full / Modern Bathroom\nFull wtw carpeting /new/ excluding bath, Oil hot water heating\n/converting to gas this summer/, central air, condo fee $183/mo\nINCLUDING heat; hot water; landscaping; pool; tennis courts. \n\nIn addition: washer, dryer /both in condo/, refrigerator, dishwasher,\n2 ceiling fans, all window treatments /I don't understand why I can't\ncall them curtains.../, and a mantle!\n\nLarge storage room in private basement, plenty of undesignated\nparking.\n\nIf you'd like to free me for the bliss of regular homeownership,\nplease call Kathleen Sullivan at the Rohrer&Sayers Real Estate Agency:\n609-546-0004. She'll arrange for a showing off.\n\nNow for that disclaimer caca: Subject to errors, changes, ommissions,\nwithdrawls, and sales without notice.\n\nThis posting is not to benefit or at the request of any commercial\nagency. I simply want out. Flames can be sent to /dev/null",
"Biblical basis for the Immaculate Conception:\n\n1) \"I will put enmity between you [the Serpent] and the woman, and\nbetween your seed and her seed, she [can also be read he] shall crush\nyour head and you shall bruise her [or his] heel.\"\n -Genesis 3.15\n\n2) \"He who commits sin is of the devil ...\"\n -1 John 3.8\n\n3) \"Hail, full of grace [greek - kecharitomene], the Lord is with thee ...\"\n -Luke 1.28\n\n From the above, we prove the doctrine of the Immaculate Conception.\n First, God has given the proto-evangel in Genesis 3.15, which is the\nfirst promise of a savior, who will redeem mankind from the wiles of\nSatan. \"[Satan] was a murderer from the beginning, and has not stood in\nthe truth because there is no truth in him.\" John 8.44. Now the\nproto-evangel promises several things, enmity between Satan and \"the\nwoman\", and enmity between Satan and \"her seed.\" Now the woman is both\nEve (who is the immediate point of reference) and Mary, the second Eve. \n\"Her seed\" is Jesus Christ, and He is also at enmity with Satan in the\nsame way as Mary is said to be at enmity with Satan. Thus, knowing as\nwe do that Jesus Christ is sinless (Hebrews 7.26), we can conclude that\nMary is also sinless because if she wasn't she would 1) not be at enmity\nwith the devil, as 1 John 3.8 tells us, and 2) the relation of her\nsinlessness to Christ's sinlessness would be called into question, as\nwould God's veracity. For God promised an enmity between Mary and the\nserpent, and it is not possible for God to lie or be decieved.\n Second, we have the Angelic Greeting where Mary is called by the\nArchangle Gabriel \"full of grace.\" As I pointed out above this is from\nthe Greek word \"Kecharitomene\" which means not just full of grace, but a\nplenitude or perfection of grace. The sense of it is best grasped by\nthe footnote to the Jerusalem Bible, \"Hail you who have been and reamin\nfilled with grace.\" But that is a little to long to say, so it is\nreduced to full of grace. And as it says, \"you who have been\" Mary had\nalways been filled with grace, from the moment of her conception, which\nwas also the moment of her salvation, until her death some years later.\n It must be admitted that it is possible that God could have done\nwhat the doctrine of the Immaclute Conception says He did do. And if\nGod could keep himself free from any contact with sin, through his\nMother, He would have, and the Bible records this fact, to which the\nFathers of the Church such as St. John Damascus, St. Augustine of Hippo\n, St. Ambrose and others are in complete agreement with, as is all of\nChristian tradition, and as is the infallible declaration of the Pope on\nthe matter in \"Ineffibilus Deus.\"",
"\n\nIt would be funny if it wasn't so damn *NASTY*; and as non-xian as I am, \nit's hard to believe that someone is pushing black is white and freedom\nis slavery so blatantly.",
"B(>i am interested in getting the pulse of this group regarding\nB(>extended operation of my G2K 486-33V with the cover removed\nB(>from the enclosure. there are a # of reasons i am considering\nB(>this, including quick access to jumpers during complex i/o card\nB(>setups.\n\nB(>my concern is that without a complete enclosure to direct the\nB(>cooling flow of air from the fan, \"hot spots\" may develop on my\nB(>motherboard or elsewhere.\n\nIf you have an adequate supply of air moving over the system (most\noffices or homes have positive ventilation) you can generally run a\nsystem without the cover for extended periods without a problem. (I'm\ntalking about completely removing the cover - not just leaving the slots\nuncovered.) HOWEVER, the biggest reason you have a cover to begin with\nis RF sheilding. Operating a system without the full cover may create\nproblems with other equipment such as your neighbor's TV or Ham radio\nstation - very much a no-no in the eyes of the law.\n\n\n * SLMR 2.1a * Remember - They're only tools, not a way of life!\n",
" ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^\n\nI've always taken Murphy's Law to be an exhortation to prudence, and\nan observation about the behavior of complex systems, rather than a\ndenial of divine benevolence.",
"\n[deletia]\n\n\n In the deletions somewhere, it mentioned something about chopping\noff of hands being a punishment for theft in Saudi Arabia. Assuming this\nis so (I wouldn't know), and assuming it is done by people fitting your\nrequirement for \"muslim\" (which I find highly likely), then would you\nplease try to convince Bobby Mozumder that muslims chop people's hands\noff?\n\n Come back when you've succeeded.\n",
"---------- cut here ---------- part 01/01\nbegin 644 1260wn31.exe\nM35KO 1D & -$,__\\@ P $ ?#_'@ !0V]P>7)I9VAT(#$Y.#DM\nM,3DY,\"!02U=!4D4@26YC+B!!;&P@4FEG:'1S(%)E7_#XK?BOJQ!-/KB]73ZD(KPH[ B\\N&Z0,V?P2,\nMV@/1CMJ+S8ON,__1Z1//\\Z6%VW04_LR.P/[.CMJY @S_XOU\\Z5+Z^B.V#/ \nM4,O1ZXO+T>O1Z]'K0RO#CL S__.EPS/V,]LSTC/_BHPP NA- (J70@*+ZB:(\nM3@ FB)X 0/H@?T 7+O0_[-=>2*C#D\"Z\"H A]^*EX(\"B^I#0R:(C@ \")HB>\nM ,#Z('] %R[DO^S77AA_M&@_X)\"(3-#4F)W@8%@ \"!@X> 1$)&3D%)14U#2UM'5T]?0-#(V,34S-S\"TLK\nM:QM;.WL'1R=G%U?7-[=W]P^/3\\\\OKV_O'Y]?WS^_?_\\ @$%#0,+&P<7-R]O\nM'Y]?WS^_?_\\/Z&L +HX>VP&++@ 3;X* \"Z+/M @ #V/J.TXLF! #[ P8( \"ZCUP&A\nM!@ NH]4!C,\".V#/ B]B+R(O0B^B+\\(OX+O\\NU0$N@S[? 0!U$\"Z!/N$! -W\nM!RZ++N$!ZP.] ,N*2[A 2Z#'M\\! \"Z.!MT>M9+HX&W0$>\nM5@8?B_/1X]'C\nM\"M[KR+S^ <.Q 3OU=R'3Z\"K1>1* P@B*Z#+DK(;$L0![P @@,8\"@?\\ 0'?SC,$N.P[= 74\"CL(N\nMB1;= 8S:B]ZQ!-/K ]..VH/F#UE:6P/N3>EK_P ! $ X2T \nM # ;P\\ !C8H - \" 7$!7@%/ 34!:Q U$-H1%Q7$%%(5(R=!*,LH ;X#\nM6 /L P$\"> =8=3'[Q48)KI2>6R' ^_$'\"XO7Q>70%,$ =;%5\nM@P5A J!\"XEX)FOQ_UR/Z_0]8)9 -[!.]] >A*D0(D1\"W:@&T6Z!28I=&\\*93\nM@GGQI:VXF&[=. <0/F[: 0#+^R$N(L'(%^5@X@*'XZX=H#.,9(:B2#TZH!TD\nMH8.3'Z(O_H^P; FTA*^4$!!A.1IH!XDY9!S\"COX7-W$;L,$CL*X3H$ JHCH?\nM'C?H4G= ,.VZ,7^JQ%'R*%\"]!TL@.R^8 % M4JYZ/Z$#1FY=, )4Y)A\\'\\A\nM.-V6-6'V?Q,PP*3!*SFZO_TV(&95.V!X>.)B[(J!_E=)/K%1_SU?X/,F ?-\\\nM23%$R$S@*O*]%J8Z/ZT*S3\"\"Y8TAY*B'0_0#[Z&J33,C;L05NZ\nM\"*_B3CF L24GXD(J4'TEL(ZX GI.@59]P_]#N+L2M*,]ZNX!#M,UF-@F2MWK\nM(0X\"3^N:Q[V+*N(^(%N3_O=B#8/S-*G!QD0#DO0';>9PQ;D*8D*8.O)_*,;3\nMI0%M8$QA!IGAW95MHW2\"\\#WP]\"Y8=)18Q(VO(A9W J>TWW_] ;GX!_FQ[O.%\nM]NL>Q&U:0'CR^>0OI)P>9 !PAP@5)$J\"= >F;QC0J&(\"T&')[P!;#@78LR) \nM.X@F!S@0^&27_T]7+9C^'=KJTWS#].@TD+7N].$TT!I-;1I(#N-T -Q#21[B\nM],H* 2I6)-/]SK.)5.(R1(BZC::'989LB!@@8#X,ZW#?&_/S[8ZF!/J8*@9H\nMV B:\\<+TB0%$H Q!]@R#7SJ\\F[-G3(!R??:D@69%KK_!63[^N-Y:#B#B]]L4)#41P5Q197A^[IQC>M=YS#,3LZ$7R7R\\:_?[]Z#5P\nM9'F;H&2\"@0M\"N0)LXH\"9\"9XFF)X@: (DHQ-T3: OH,Q*VAM4GT>E[N\\5M#ID\nM^1XMZEY\\5 %SJ#PZ. (8C1?0Y.,N8$/E\\Q]M\"55XL&L<-S;F%\"!CK (]@/I/\nM#F/((<4*P?'_70D((4!'/&E;'.Q76?0JB6PWZASJ$HC0 PIL9(+HD4+ *-T\"\nMY:JPQN$6%_M5/]\"O.X3L@%48/(OS3T2&5 4N%%YW0262V+._]R%?!?ZG ;G,\nMI!&&$\"YTN @O0::N!7H3L$7B'$W> \\H 0=+M: (L2V!XE:+)@4<=FIQX%6) \nM@_X;1K0(T*'!J>A1\\5ECP'6GRIPKGJ[YP]<7[)F'[$>)&P$3&%/<#-028 GT\nMOH%\"N6[8^WZ$YT$:.=6_$W0H<%@GY!U,;T?,'B)Z*^X>4A(&2: E]QFZRJHH T?0EX6/+K0J'^Z( .[Y4==06MZ*WII2ZW>$)UULPWB<(1E@0TFJ@B)7Z18(\nMKHIP,0W/V7'Z*M>T3 58Q>VW 6FY,X 68D,Q>)MA8R%[2[T2<;_@DVR(_KT(\nMG:A=>TSC18A@+EQ_@9P$4!_NB$!@OB@,XLY36C#6Y;;\\LJYYP#Z3#QPH!\\P#\nMJ6@-3@,[$TK9NE:=!\"6& B9[($H7; ^B3K=G#Z:_KM=?)) .]H*:W2AQ-\"RJ\nME^X#:)9O U@'HI]X(%_UZ0OBT[K=L/1\nMI'6/!EOPN$%^8O*AV(Q%KB]&@^+__^M[O4!J R@DXL$A@WGHT?_I+0;TK;\"@\nME7F0; 1>S<%IW0I9\"Y&O)LFS5N?GV@Y@JT:\"E$K:M@OD $*>O:QHO^X!C.2D\nM<8OZA-6G!ZT4IG7J =<^4BM91%B_)F\\Q!_K]K4JX!\nMCD<=WO6 5],O0KMIF*/$>W#XU0!S306Q&D#_I$]QN?0&_FL08, YN%U\\% 7V\nMQE@?F,?G,C'?#2M?BP]R$WAQ#132!5%&I9MAK*J^WQZQ?(@:<;!9_\"<\\L>!_\nMI_KK_A)!!_6UF.T!-J7!]'/_[6AC&I58AW!>I5\"LX),O-7J9)\"I#O[+T.#=\nM\"C%0H-P#,;\"@G1B(<*%=B[C!N*1!>R/4J_71#ZZ?GGJ T&C_J +H-P.DR4:Z\nMP4*W M=?=<;\"QN0?LYZVPBO=;$% X@.\nMZ5MH;1&;]C(]#-PK10RMMX%!84OP.&*!Z>/^ _-O+3* ^!4#6#40&] S8>72\nM_=RZ ]/K#$ H\".,>11$6$\"^P:0;RR2#ML&T/GKA>DJCX'*&ZQ.5HN\"C4U?J60)I4\"#='3%P(%T:<4EK\nMZBDF5G#@>F0H)\\ Y8-6CCMP@-( S84I?:>#+O- 72?@!^&PM/_#AB$GZ:7^V_'AZ_/V\\*0P!@Z[RI<\nM[-,26>5AW^'&J UQ=8W_ZPK\\7Q.]2GWVB* 73-A_\\'&\"3NN:PVJ.2#MKR\nMRED5II26Y:,W+:_9+74E3?2?_Z,G_R\"I*OJF#;8%J98RK!H\\6/\"&]6'WOV\"N\nM7PBX)T@[$N@\"NGHTIU_W=>%9*]65&+Q2N4'T9O,94 /NX_2JZ@+XMCQ6>4AD\nM:@,,2_%JQ _K@L<-PZD;?X/GDE8((]K%^!/[=25]D.(1--Q9UX%4&EWL/?KX\nM@=V/)O[K\"A'J^CDU%<@D\"K5*R1ZS^&1;@XNQ#^P(^.__EW07%$'RG2QJ8-V)\nM7@6\\=73]N&_7QEP2=VI]) !?+0_9G@>AZ(BH@$X<6^$H$FHB@A\nM6R&^D]\"H@;!>2D@@:9!!#&JE!LH]'JF_ 7QDI]&7E;_(1M7?&M=!U#,_RG=K\nM8H\"BS3;4O!.@R@&Z1P3$-P>VB'VT;,#!Q@4NY@CX9POH\"=09<&3=B+A7B&L/\nM(I@O%XX\"6^P0=[A1+ZZ20D,2FMWGY1T24)=C4O2 YZ-WWS^T2UV-$ 1T/(P_\nMLAP#)-H\\I$S[@'*/3(?BOW&? 2L'0;98X7#:-V$#P*A8N$QRR4F P\\-UO^3*\nM7_%#GC,.+N5]=_%?@5?3@,YAFY,77N(#/T@9\"NE]J0X^+\nMGPHL?I6@C57A!SW+BZD+%9('H$]A?;2_L?Q^-'!=8#1E>5?/.JQP.!\nM]?'=BZTB7.R'?/Q]L?#Q(PM+I_N1_\\SVINE67%E_8#.0BZ$OWI^4+@.>!9^*\nMU[^>8%&EX,G/! 89I+C8^%MI/I\nMP%OVF\"[E/%,Z5J@E__<+LC]W\\(@.HS[79(F4BW\\EZ%BZ_> !ZQ:$#//AT\"0.\nM*/[^;M\\#'4^GC/7C%AMYJ ZG/@<@3-#Y&KQOD+84B(R'8]TYW&[ R8ZQS[2_\nMV'E2_JQY%J%F(&*MJR )%K T1=YV&E0\\>MC_/W!%S,/[.\\$4Y-S]_(VR8EKY\nMT=U]#1HD\"%0U;)VJ6:LF1-WMOAX_@.H2(\"3I<#%RPKU[=VF=BF40EY4R?=;$QZ]SY_EXN$\nM<+TK)X:)T#FJ QV7[=+VS]HJH$NC1Q475,S!@';4*9QN1L+;Z3K5J9VN4IW#\nMZ9K7Z9VN>)W=Z3I@A^CR,!$D &C=F$9<@;$,'!&!$L9SQ':\\8X\\.[('_OWX^\nM3K8!Z0)=SXS7N@;*-__.#1NP6C>!-0#^\\+JRCXC@ SU<( :!,/33HT82$./@\nM#.TGH,*ZCM)O7<1KW7*N0(1$B- ]3CH0L:>G^V^FKD%%S/[BKPAI\"Q'M0'-)\nM.SX@AMBDE_C;TTL^!-\"C2A)))C/TXX88>KW]$/>/..C_PE49TG3D^4D)B?]%6/PN0<;\"%Q\\?;W-P\nM?HAS\":X_23KI?6,FAO'Q](G)>/T\"\\ASP..+W/O9WPZC!TPN<;[9TUL'A!ZXW\nMW]_-+1H\\\\G9=X7KA# \\I[C9M_ >!;G0 \\M:[?\\C\\QDN I5LR$=N;*NPO=R\nMBGF;]!L&=N8Q-DXSX'WSL1%.1^_EQ:Q9/H3;0) A_?\\V*>M&ORF&/'KA_V42\nM1%Q@2WGTOU/^==5=CA7]'N<:)>[7(./BZSF& F(&W\"QVP//X<+QBXC+).RYN\nM4F9!5:VCT[KAOY3[HF\\:F\nM]S^M2\\Y3\"! W9A7\"![&JJ'<&(<'_T+0Z4DW_LQXK;CFTHRYW(.OND/4!CA<@\nMW^*^U$;1/]Q7E4ZDZ^8_SB#_\\17^Q^G*7'^C64.0BT(:)-K%\\$I&T/]7PE]H\nMWV\\&;(]ZNWXB;FCZV' ?=:S.2+M<7D:_V_X#8^5U=3:A<\nMW\\V9TF17_F]$#UKHT[!; TG(>2_/<,(QT-/O [T1I_QQ'JP[\\(C?\"C'^GV#=\nM9:MM8AQ%?X4L%M!8\"6-2AC+\"7-<_%X&==GP^2-]?]_LU&%[G.)J;W4[O#730\nM@@YB<#F9V*K_Q3Z=-QCY8@[^;@Z,=Q7*+9C3+_\\Y2 \\$=5]%[S/]\nM(@&6K@7$IK3+/P-E5@9 9_N'ZW^]1\"U$OQMOKM/0&'4O-*A15^$7V4CN7BE]\nMIP6<-;C3 *IV#RZR 4? PE\"4QX+V1\\/0T2O#0P\\21D<_\"O'LI<48-X4K\nM9D@*@(BXM%.(\"V22;,'1INRL 1G>,. C/-S=\nM\":TVOIULO\"BV\\\"%>(QK@!6UGH< E[F\\&$4Z!#M''_H_+Q!Z0H*!\\B;H'&B\",\nM#( L*$B;_M<_;+%OHA,0>/7Y4 'X]$ZQRB4,[AM%_T/REI]=ONWH^_X1%SSJ\nMM&Z[-.XEBLAZ01OX5*_[!@K &W&+L,N _!X%GK%FD)[@#%L>A51-*CZJD\"1!\nM'N1K'=\"@(.PE (?\\^L^^QPS;4,'(Y]%?/)^>'#!K<#\"4?'BE0#1;$/WU!.R@\nM0]L# =1]*PJ0+>'V'V>@J3#1>8%U08!\"M .$00%M!0B!(MF&/QQ?9:S;@ 40\nMG00]KO=0'X*H#RR US_UX8'^T&4H*BQ N*/UH5FC@;S$R/W5:]@,.V@8D [F\nM:@>OZ M\"<&G;4X0MS%6\\H$, D.[7R-X/[P:&D\\\"31$I>HH T=]-N,(TK%G_\nMZ-\\U^I;C[BN]J5EH):@8G)WZ]_%3NE,GJCKI_6/IU)I3KSF%_JK?;'#P$+&:\nME;Q_YK: ZNL+!DX'= \\-G _BW7JL+A8^W^SJ_;E@+LTK+[BZUBVEJZ]25U<]\nM^4NV+>=]3U'PP7^Y^*\\'_'5T?\"D4C1_P5.NZ:V!UYBSD#!;]1>*E733B?MW?\nM[9N;#0@?PC#:0GI<<%&4P?'=J/F8!?ZGFR K]H90EQ<;]GZ0CUX,$&B=^)\\F\nM>N?_2GX\\)R,>(]S_7@[L44B+ #9#$=1Z62'ZY1!&H@C&!#N0A)F7B?_+O%28\nM? '/H4IR=^!)05$=M?!EY1X!JN\"5A2?6C1@:G6E7?<,ZJ*TE[C%*&5 )\\K$Z&:\nM=QHWJH]ZWRF\"+_WR6P#YP=I27;5+0!5]17_!$&L0MQC\nMG>9 ?8-GZ(E.ZTX'[%>_CRK5!QQ1SQ)UU9>Q):)'3,&-E9X+C._'B_1K@=AF\nM]MR\\=],,!&Z6!Q=F?1NYU02Y*IT<_9X<#1X^'N\nM.CT$]II=8*_QL8NA@*Z*[L,'$)6O$#>X^(KBE#\\_IL[PFZ$IJ5\\5GTA/+VC_\nM#4D^)\"C!S2!L O0!#,R>E_C?*?ZZY_3W$_? #]AP!4AYFF@:]]%K'Y?JJCXX\nM(M; $0: $7*.WFP]-0XBPZGVL*S]\nMQ=@;!PWH08S%OW(X$O?;\\3Q/\"V^'R,YH8(\\\"@DNJY:_+[><&!\\)[[XM!^I,[=7H2QZQ1O]\nM+T>\\$7'0B.+E=Y&PW#@NQ,:Y'P8I,3_>@XG2$YI^N\nM??72NNRR6J@E%[LUV-@SQ(!-^5]E+8/_C%_Q0/\\#+T<_OSAB%,*SH9\"CBX^.\nMO;!T\\/B#@)R./>O7U>*Q=6RAPR/R%_] _E4!CD?(#!FS5N1O4OKZH8J7H=- \nM5TZ72W\"^ZKOK*K>0XHB+(E:LB7V:U&60PZ%.C2K5(/I65#?Z@UJS;L7:%\"_Y\nMX47I (/G_WL!!TWK;IHWXWKJ7JVRHON$?_-!Q22-KD]X>#OD)IS-[K6U5<7L\nM%3OD &XZI-Y0I$E\\Y+AXR*%(DCQ(-SQ.@R1U1[:K ;(^O;*\"+'C#Q:>C%_!\"\nMP1];Y >LV\\/1-F B%)G^Z7_T: .N7P'=]X^T+D90G.L?N\"B(+!%&AAV '$8J\"O;1\nM!Z/U&JK?TV,- +7DQLF!_R.T/5J+R_V\nM!W< .4+(AP&-6E+4W3*AZ[FC+2/F3-#E80M &MU\\8LH$W<0.>A\\4ZJM>[(%1\nMPO_I^@7\\&Z%C@'5W\\K-'\\;KS$ 4JP\\:+H?<$&%!N8[KOD/@W0<>Y 2+L/QGG\nM(\\S2/:[X,$&'JJ,AKS\\Q@3L**0IEO2EL\\7;0P]O!!R\\'P1-7/$RK'O;/7W4N\nM+E[IW&ACP@-1[CQN%^A\\4C76N@OV4]<_:+>PS21AJ^5+ ]82/V\"]WQ\\7UKWR\nM>.25P3@?O4& D=>C3M^X7Z6]V'WT:^O5V@O''8;-&G#5Q[:KUKUS^-V D]SV\nM[T[X.+$'1.\"O4#U.G6'W'GMZ/ZMO@S L6?ZR RX.'CT=P1(&IQD&14*,(6RX\nM_H\"/L/5DQ!'N <6[1X\\1X '^=GJ,_A6;0!9A1U1)7!1R.8S=<\"I58,#A (SY\nMNW\\\"U/T?@)6_BA\\;!CS]G/=XOF+ Q@$OAN=GWB%BQH;_H'7#?@?>WRG?KCRN\nM6X#Y+EX7PS8-,#.CM2/N!(-ZAVBZ)G O$K^B,0'Q\"QRO1S\nM)=KOKK+Y='7H%^(K3:.*F]=\"OJ:C@19E_D/V\\,28W;N>#\"6$J$N;,=:7(^P.\nM^=AAW_5&[0O_2;<64[J5Y/2M)!Y9S+L^(_IG[-N0A*739346VE'1!06HWKE]\nMU';YJ(K]2-\"IW+3H\"W$N6?22(&J$Q.L)/ZQ],+KZN5K]+C@;#5<;/5(OYD1?\nM!;4TT8N!2!U]%X@5T:&_UQ=%/P6BF_.BN7NI=!QHW?5OH&/_S?%Z(D.YIA6+\nM%VF2;$/0C'4K1G9KU-9G5C#WK^)/^&[DZ>,C*^1&W&8ZX&ZQT=6\"=!TT;,(E\nM#!QO#W.,MSF69?NM_2&^W\nM)?'MMG+T@- PYR_AV \nM_N.#/!76/6AT?<.9_]*)%#*10B2KLAO$\nM1]Q*A'423!?T0MX+[%_D*WQR@TY*<6/1 \\:.6XH@CD>/&R$#V @F!*.G\"'EN\nMK/O^OP$T/],>T>G[(H :4K7 +6:[=]%V\"DO_[: TASK!+][]\\^%:/$C^NX$9XB;)WD0]W\\FA#N8\nMO'^;B4U:'2\"!4BC76,JOD=H<#77@P/N)%)+Q\\)7>[V^GK82S-AE[/#[0XD'^\nMOZ43S UQ]\\IG:KI5N>1. !((!!]^Q83MV&'T QB:BT DIB.3N9XR\\ =]''M@8P-WA[H\\ /.DKJ5\nMHR $#!<[I$APO$O'!L#4!%]E\";\"X08L$&6N?N=WF?X\\2\"*EX]._1RKM-PX]=>#NQ1OJ%6/\nMQ2W64F5+\"'F\"O):GOM[0(^CY R\"EA_5EPF$V)Q4^?;JXX7C[_Z.OEQ<''0Y^\nM3W!QP85%!=*5_[_C>O?#D@YD/_7.&+MCX(O]2/\"<=:#MC>O^LS=0\"MZ/OC+_\nM87_R<9O3B)WA!N%=/W>AZ)N&1U>F!SO!6;7XQ3F[1#$6QJ.[_-F8->C\\;+5SW/I)/<>\"?!9!G0->Z2$BO\nMML-XXA-1[$?RB\"=8X3JR]3B_4A' $-].5WQ0 ;8;D658GAKG$B08%/'!(8&P\nM[GM):R0F!&PB'!S^X_B$T<%'EUX1( #PQJQ).^?Z C%P!V,)H,7T6(():>LH\nM!N?&[PF!.V1+M#W%L%?+\\@:<\\5=:-+WN@Y/SKJR4+RM(.(HTC!TQ\":2.Q\nMKA^DE#I@+Q(7I\"U2)M[?4F[=YR .3 [K/.8P+(!9AXH/IR0OH\nM*9B;0YJ\"\"/FL_FMA@6FGW>.P>*LNI/VC>PHD!NM4 ?( ;*@.,B(#1YPL8(4,\nMW*+ X@YX18/Z29FX^>F?'8+N^L3G*<+>6L 0>19]3 &I&!GWT]?=_]B@_H&Z\nM2.*TF'P@W11%RT!D\"9\"Q07:*WX<9UA=FC1Q/[5#]@F<-H?KM]!P;H\nM2$7!_5NZ^WDFI'M/5?F-'G?MD3C>TT6GA.24D(L28N4IDBY)GESI#A2ZGOS,\nMY$%P0:E/\"0D.X#]/2W!P8C3D>5WEZP.( ^\"N$,83=JBK863W >.V#:/T]9E'/$VFHJI=/#<+F.H_0\nM:!1,IZKGT!0!LU@%U84SJA#$6STCNZ\\9L\\V,EC)C,QW\"58\\?8*_^-ZDO1[]*\nM2L(X7'-Q^L7YD^1=DI*%Z-BX2< ^&$/-&P#&B_#C^HM>!DK2_^+^TY]I/^GXB8%Y[AQ*MV!BOP\"+%NF#%=\\^\nML1-7]2Y7><6Z[]LDP=8[A6$Q4,MT&5Z:2+KX_OKUEK\\<\\).@L^B7)72=HN3%\nM^DXQYZ54M%^-HMR),U(^'3X7/Q3IXUA*P8/H'>QF5B9Y=.SN<-',!RHD7W=$\nM%_\\W(#OG, 2!WX1=^)N?L0BYM'!'/027W^O3FH@D\\ZZ.'_)\nMS&E.X+](ZV#A%#P^N1Z)RNZ!2.E&W'F?;L/%1 4F-LK0*GJ= +W.A3G8.,' \nM_E\"=2W\"A]+H&\\N?ZCHNU#Q[^,/KVV .GKPLQE9M>[C@8%]%^3@\\>BB9J\">8B 4AAPH'9\nM0Y&S*R27;RTWH PU K7)KYLB^6++@ ^!G=&P\"%3TC\nMRC/EKUP^,+@CQF++G%CE0B0)'XFTSLJ+71!N0 L,0#V>/O*]ZA287J\\*%V*S\nMFK&X8+8^KHD7'H@L#II5.* .',>\\V=T+HYF1]1E_?Q.]2P!\"F/@*W'U@-VYD\nMGJ&!B.$\\^F[EX0%!:.I1/IQB\\@1*J-,*R>2([ Q=)V0A9F QG'$5T303$?C\nM MBOCJLO3%Z7_OWYB^'YT$B8(KP'_XPNE^$.Q-X]*-> LD&[ 9TPOF6O6UHD\nM%<8W&.6E,)3KBSP#8\"(+& P1'\"\\7Q$N#*YATHU4%% E0-'A?^WUL?B^&39GM\nMQQL(D.+U#].0= !U\"8G;9:!?J B,W2K\\#=$V/VJQZ/J+)B0=R\\RNN+EB]8JM\nM*T+GQQ&>5FB[<1$\nM_2>F.\"S5W_P7?T%^LF^(?OI_W_\"8!WR6JP#L#3\\_>#I W04)8?OWQ4P?)MY[K@?\"B$!U58\nM@Q4\\2-7P0>0#2JU\")!-ZG:,<0C!$Q#@S9HT:X)T@H10:(>-KW!Y-,#H\nM&<1CLU+)/ HU:%/H69-ZO0H\"!\\DPBM5J4F%5J6:]*F3RZ9)J00'Q,/8] EB\nMC2:Q!\\ %&=1I%J8<-(LGJ'#*9)+1,>1B&GJ\"*VAWW!MRBAXB#W1P3HS\"C?&R\nM*TXU/$T.6N)7;/IS2*$JH,>Z<-D +AE8\\![2K\\-[4)]\"CS)\\&S3 :1L2#0FH\nM@&R;%.XRO#L!6#0ZV$*S+X8Z AS) 7N?KIM\\$9,A;\\/A#6S -:P $PZ^#O=-\nMM-9L'3H*EF$\"0Q >,4%&\"H088H^,P(CC!.8]'F5\"X3Q@F.P;S.-C-S.1=,'Y\nM05BC5CVFQ!7'- FS-A(#Z %&$L.\\:<$*-L=#CT-;(BW.I-\"R-, OFU:.\nM8TU[-HUKPUSC?L CM*\\'(ID(4Q,V9;#AG#+9JG/@8ED=0PZWX/=*9+N0)*L#\nMFD,]$DN>7H%RO&\"V\nMS#5\"FD0Y-R5(%/A_LV& ;;HI\"DDRAF . 0FV8#)'^G*R]N=X8)ED71\"\"1AK\\3/=AP:Q\"RQY>!.ED*L2V%X!\"Q+AS1\nM.05.# 0YLDM<3ELD0B:,=>+>\"=L8]9HG\nMQC%\\X*^O$$H&O$(5*%7)\\@=BUQ!*I\"4N\"('9H$R9M(PNBNYUQT#T@93KQT3/I+:H-@X'J2M\nM+3Y'<*IYY>0FS\\15&WS6&X\\\"50$Z<\"I\"_N4$[@M'J4X!,H5*-0:C+HMB+4)Q\nMZ-,F+H#GPS@I91U(@25DYV@@ $<5_4HV3R_B.5*+3[8G1IGWI=N4/QB;1'+1\nM[0FFNM;MVSODD -8\\O26R700CBK.$WG(KI/MVS%*LVB,(H_X34^BE%!RWXSR\nM-K(Y5.I0$,5NH?3I$H8,&U@0W..$<.4 [MP0-'GX1:9\\@[@^NH$I1.P+DZ1:\nMIF:)5\"R)TPU6@=ZBT<0ULX$-Z+4F(+[ IC9\\Y[6=]EOZR>*+*D7J&9;N&4\"*Z20QPU)M^;.GS3KNFVZ =&3(5.&)$N&NKT4*->O4S<^\nMU6@5J52L#RG.M(MU*%&':[,>-5H08=\"G28-F% #NJVV+E^?2J$/CGH7*E^U$\nMF3QA/D!:A7HUFA K4Z1*;^ZD03S':Y6FQ,1GBXZ$) +T9ZE3-F3\" (>G8.A[\nMP!W!DQ*@U8$[AWXUFI1IT:])G1I]\\@R<2!%@X,\"! P;XV]#] \"8_Y\"VA18$\"\nM,3: ^ADR/(C0HL7_$AM*%/CO#2)/GDZ;3CWJPV0LU29,&**++<(:B7I(=&H&\nM>GS'@C^@-IR1#2I=JUZWW330#VZ'/XJU/4&!F\",@P.MTU#O$[EDTG+='$2\"T\nMH;^[B:S+%OEI]0%@63G ;$LZ_KLZFQ#K HI(&2'\".\\-4O@GWC7#4%$; 1Y$T\nM____!U!+ P0* !@#R2@L9;![>X' % !K% \"P $Q:4C$R-C N5U!$\nM#P 2 R05-B& H0=6!'@AV54'Q#_0\nMPKDE?SS@38(7NGGW@&D)C@2X%B!9@($!*MC*@M\\XL\"I 8E II+]H&&@5/,C_\nM=90]RK!S43*\\1X\"3P RBMF,2ZMNY=*>.E9L6+EV 0]_6.;ZL7(!CVP)\\\"_\",\nMVNCN ZFI#1VR?$#5!-0&]';-9&L!QW0WM4$.:C>L6[I'P\\HE6T;YHT(!PG$;\nM= \"W 51ZS20MMP'L$R]#!R1(,8\"7.6\\!;^, \"W@9\\(5$O SE-AW ;0#%RP!T\nMHD]0#]KTP-@ O P;\\:% *&\\#ZKEF\\K0 U .BT+=OU[:1N^.T/!NUX5L/# U \nMR[ 1-:@-\"$D$HS:@)K$R-.B!LZQ,ZY.G([(S(B\"B:R91K0W0F5@9NN_ .5:F\nMU,;% 7Z0 ZCNFDE7:@,4*T->'=BL#5\"6#OC\"H4*L#*4VU0:$VH W(!R(5J$F\nM';$VX S4[E4VHS8:]D!2K0*9.^#] 6H#NKEFTE0;2&YJ@XRT+%N[9>FF'1M&\nMX]V&;6C4 SNY 3JD]X#HV ;4=0\"!?R_4!R/ ]2H0#9 :3'!^A.R]X=6L;EQ.OG@1XM6S&FNMNQ\nM8JX([7V@-(,+*5#@HU<(J/^:R5]T [#3J!D:^-8&5'7-I*JU :I4@&H*1&NCY0]\\&6!M@I]'\nMP/E+6!M0P?4L\\-G6!GEJWC:.')2?PX8B9S%IHXL/[*9YD*K< B_BX^J,HDM\nM;9\"IIFU;!B!.58B4#6VDWX%^+@^2T^ ,- &S\"12AA8]T!;E04I*&Q#+-9.E\nMT@98:$,\"'G@G\\B CH0V(Y)I)4F@#;\"D!K*=!&[UR()$H0P?U@C8@4$*PW] &\nM60L+M-FA:\"#,8R#B>0'J'?,VU,(: )8QH'G4T +QO0VH['P7W-M ):+:GQ4#\nMVWUY+4^VL9W>L),DH /:L'/PA[-^+\\B^'U1G.NO7G4NFY$X7I-BR9_8'R4;F\nM3L>MZ'$4RWLS>[9OL,/7&O@ FZ;+F#+PS^G\"'MJ&/4\"C/R9,ES/ $+TB ,M(% 2R1)P0@)U3B'9;&L-<87FR-[LTHZFG?] EP\nMZ\"/F088Q#T$.]!CD %4&.4 1\"QRYKR '^04\"XG4X?[-ERY(%87[=,I?E;^4 \nMF;-@!V0SQ\\]IAP^Q&BYDV,7\\$\" :\\H@R[/:&W86M^)AAOS3LGX;=U+#'&O9:\nMPYYKV'L-.[%A[S=LHVNZV[\"'&G9+G^9IAKW:LG\\X=GV.3!(= #<(TD %4$L#\nM! H & $ 9:AA)<@PP+;P#=$##[O\"C;H< \nM:2=L'A)W0\";$4T6;=BY(N'+?GI4;MBW(L6'=NGU+%Z38LB#EUG4+,HWP1)].\nM!=GV+=FR+ALJ)#$T[K1H08IO&SX>F#XY\\_T!!W\\$\"/I!M6[89LT/!(A10%+C\nM#'BT(=:&7AOZC3\"]I+2X0(0\\ ]I.<+S\"@3X#BE0(M U>.[9T0,T:Y'5L;<&*->B=P;'?V?H$J%,\nM &\\UO-&+JPL\\-SSKBQ'^72+!^1?)W>7E!])$:'EE7 ;#%6F'@!&4B=O$4*9A\nMIB>88!I/A P@VGN4,/>0^0P38?4^&+9!2QS*,M\\\nMP#+_,\\X)3$5=\\P++/-@R-[#,X8VS)],#-RS+F6D+RVS+=(IEMF6:QS+;,OUD\nMF:U%&PQ\\X2HN=B.\"O^PJ6NV&TY>KZ#K+[\"H:T#*[BEZTS*ZB+6_8@UQ%=][H\nMX(SHU1L;_!&->Z.\".:*%;V0P1[3SC0GFB+ZVS*ZBP2WS!LL\\W3)WL,SE+?,'\nMRWS?7!S\"D&@.RQIAF2_DL+9*6.85.:PM;Z!#.'+:$UK7,MD1;NXIMB?;.\nMT<>6T!P[^M@26FM'\"EM\"N^WH8DMHSAT=; FMNB.'+:&-Y7);0J/;9UNB^7=$\nML\"4T08\\@MH0FL;6P)G=DC@BVA0WL\\LB4T>H\\LMH2F^)'\"\nMEM !MD2B_(AEM-& /\\I;MBW1B>)\nMHV5+]&22*0,LMR6:=XEEV1)=WN219=L2S1+%OFR)_IAB7[9$WTWQM6R)3JMB\nM6;9$;UWQ1F>P)3KSRB_+MB4:_XIQV1*MGL7G.8,MT?%9C,N6:*@M H$SV!*-\nMT<6R;(D&[V(HV1(]_<71LB5:8. I6^+%80YYDQ<[98XPQK(F6^9+EKFS9>YH\nMF4M;YM%C%EGV:\\O,K\\_4\\BR[YOY-(V[U=\\RYTOC6@4N6%9?U[S ,@]8XYQS\"9)D7Q_&N1I:YPQS7RF296\\UQK5\"6^><<3]0JR[Q\\CJDURS)7\nMJ6-9O2SS-\\N-H3;/,^2WS-LN:#EKFG96YHF8?GL;8J6N8F>VRECI8YFV4^:9G+6N:7ECG^GDJ6\nM?=,R%^ICT/73,D_LXUI)+?/I/IY25,M\\XX\\U*:ME_O7'VOIJF9/^L:^SEOGZ\nM'U^KK64>$\\B[YEKF=8&,*Z]ESAO(N );Y@*#7.NP99XTR.VKL66^.,AOLV7N\nM[)HWNUQ:R+5\"6^93A:I8=FI[H(7,I=>6^7$A7ZNV9=YPR!;5VQ[H(6MKN&7>\nM>>B*92>WS)$/F15%MWG4-6]W.S2198VWS)42F5KK+7/(1(Y6?,O\\.I$C*;]E\nMSK'(M0; F7QLD7<]L,Q3%SE:&2SS@8%^*DV]R$77#+_.M1=YB*IAF75AT:/\nM],3!0S],^N#FH3TF';7RT,&3@OAXZ/!)+WP\\-/ZD#\"8>FJ!2IP(F'EXPT$^E\nMI3)]L E0C>9, T(E2/0K5\"?$BH18K1 [$V=EDLR1[/Y\"!SZ%.E7 \\ *)-B50\nM/%(BT5L=.+6JT(9$F1YQ/RC4HE*G)M7\"I41OH02&_0FR$T$V$#[SI2POA=JE\nM4*N4877\"[$Z%%B#6)\\HROE\"B X1/8CP3XYD8/T3MA*-^:!/ABEOZ <)-?T3[\nM(]J.I'DDVHYTB''B$QCV)\\CV;.HC47JD5OHO0\"S4;I6)LR%S)\\C6MA&+N+3]\nMP\"5.V?!+B#D68I=Z5\"\"3JV=RM3,Y*N' =[*U#7L29!L6(.^4\"K13@58JPRK%\nM2#7)WOV)L#$/A7DH8CD486-^BM!/4;)/>>LI;_D4K+)_0+X9)VQ(;P5IMX*T\nM6D':K2#M6I*<\\$$)#)M8$6L295%?*Y$9YBEXGQ0J%9_BCFF8AY+*0]0\nMMVI,*4\"J!20KQ9<#GE5HP!YD]:P<^N8=BKG ;5,KQZ$\"EO69)!9/-TP6KPX]\nM\"UB:=.B\\ (F:0#9+Z3WK@K#4X?('Q0I;8H!ZFD#*ZUDC9AS!D%KG6\"I&Q2\\$\nM#Z!8W0HH=H&%*Q0[0?8#BE4F@6(?*+7 LMI95H(NKCFF8@V(&4&W\"S:#WP6Q;M4#,42Y J\nM5@[%',*U/E16S'&-\\T)EJT2S$(H553%75ZP7@N89CJ9QG<638_A:NX6E!?DG\nM.$O;I%D'7LA+(VJZ6PFB*5L'(HI6@X&O\nM\"FR^98X=B=X1^]S=FU7@KK4UXK!HE=#-)88JLB)8IF?5*T(=06*A:,5NK9C+\nM_W\"Y;)G76=:+FY+2@BH5%\"N;XD<2)2K5*DBH;^?2G3I6;EJX=)0KWBW=LG)U\nMQH0)D^6,8:J'LT%_RJK/M$A2*YBX6TTZM&C3)\\%(ADG\\#Y8,RV42#U946'4I%[!L6Q4JE'JF%TCZB+H?XU:1$J2*I!\"OP\nM=BK#_K0J%2A_T*B3LTMVZ ER%.<.A12-:?SU8M.W>)]4:=5FUQM==I W*:W\nMV7D)\\54\":RZ\\^HO\\7=X_/2JM^R)&.Q.1XPBZFZ92] R@IN3R)E.G>2LT&H0^\nMM9=2O93&_\\ DK)3\\R2#U<]+XJ)-OGO33H=:&[BV3\\D;ZNMJ947G[!I5M9$_4\nM:I!73+VQZ6C2BH3/26W\\25.3LH$F.Q3ASC#$J%6NST(4A7\\3)\\]E5Q.$8[&D\nM3.\\%=W(J6S)MK:!EH_-.F4J)I!-4E=!-XDZ-U,+$([,;(=\nM:D *%)&F\\O9,O90Y40RY)U:_$\"<9ZOT JG9.6PK]*4_1R9I0WK;X27DC5 Q\\\nMJ?H!3A@RAN]5H93374H6%0QXP:J+V5^UZMNC0>)^'>:^L=(NO=@HP<5>'9I,\nM?!0C<;L*3?ZG:Q\"M?X!KC2)4\"'4Q?LU#WIT8-R? 32/@]JN:L5BC#4Q_EZ!:\nMLO_M&M3<9AU![0:HZ4[I\"*!U,5CHU\":'8$QC-H=@3-M +U$;2;_)ICO:-I\nM3*./>;\"*K9JV48W>EH[F,8V.EP[OHQI=,$ Z3F0:O3% .M)(-?I%.IK)-+I(\nM.KR3:G26=#25:?2;='@KU>A!Z6@LT^BP Z9QK2:/'_52Z'O]NKA\\5V&NN4>L\nMD(M\\P3TZQCZ8O8DR?-RHO!#C1O6):(/\"\"XT:I#NCOC@^^\"])HG53F@S\\5V35\nM@75#'#L(G77=#,=N4I\"..D+80Q#>P>RL^?\\_^Q<\"IWM4+5\"TQ@$T\\T1)!WW=\nM@>GC&B\"GA&<@O(+J#3+VBM C5+4 @E\\,SQZ'P$U[M,*/Y2V6/Q&D27I(J 'J^5'S_@6,N?\\\"T(O;*XWEZS9^QJ_U\"M[A8KO\\!^,$H'6YF](O\nM+NKBXU_7_,#YB>V*TUKZ6NG_@'4OK@2V.(N#/!.>X:) 4.U9\\01:SZC-V5C:(K'D'QZHJCRMDO/D \\\nMN:_G#6J#\".P7+I)7=T[<^_H$Q.-3EJ@5_F)O0O^;U5K3A:$VHCIL7_]Q\\?#&\nM?LEA:8L'NN[H\nMW/D>8'/%/=N9-@^%]QWR \"\"JN>;1\"6_OV4$],V97]TS#>F;,SNZ9@B/%[.Z>\nM:6C?C-GA/=/E#3PK?/M&2,ITEWP>S6-)0SCR])![(*9[8 AS8^77%S\"V6BE^\nM\"\\)3;/2D+>#![2^2?(::SAU]^GWY4U@Q2%EH75-?)@X &*7#!\"77&=\"=D7-?IF1M#I*5DC$&S^<70\"\\M;N%\nM:J>DK9:(10LM_6%.7?W/V#T9TZ)(O#6Q,6X5H4&/C7\\CR.+P'6O//08(_O&@\nM8^&+L4GQIT8@M;N=*0CGF']47S-GK%V ,^?D3')SIDTYD]Z<:5+.)#AG6I0S\nM*L)(+L=(,A,0/N4'74V 3E2*OJZ :#Q!;\nM?/%A5O\\T8?(\"GFE7SZ2Y9Q+6,XGNF90-X(G\\L'H!=I23-E\\#=(\\585T)U8*[\nMRP+(USWPM6@%F[8+)W+[\nM-(=F&D]6.J4OKVMW<.>:1MITR*:*2G01TDTTTR::1/-M))F&J5BLQ-+\nM @3)@3S\\S0<4EZ7Z#>//C1LQW3*B\"K>)?\"&WG[>$J$Q[_%:4P;T+AO_!X\nM'8-JP$\\OH^(\nMV7C713%G C_H 51#&E,.]<1$!1P[L%:REK, 9BMNX4R4@#X<(IR]A2]10,U.\nM>P7%NRL.Y\\0(7N$L(,_EKXA6A(.-.QQ\\W. @KJ][^#@!+5)U$4!$&@ BU-H;\nM=3B*2)GST0!3\\&\\\\Q;TZ1,,^YM@7O/N'0BUS>A]@^P3'\nMGSCV2,>.XMB9I#F_.W8.QZ[B:8>8X/T)]_;AFA[6L=?Z=Q['GN[8>QQ[O&/W\nM<>S,CCW(L2LX=BS'CFYHOS;L\"JYV?V_[C[<=P+,#XVAUV_%1K@TER(\\!2(YN\nM#6F\"=#] :0D)&<8*I!U?IM=?\\ ;)CI1*= A&PZ/ '@/&HIX&9!#G@!$!'@!K\nMV@+6\\!R8!DP*0(.= S1!X\"\"=(&:O?X7<-WY)G@*@;52;[*X6!.W@\"9X-P LG\nM/]B' >)\\/M0V(6@>%5LO_.?+ACM[& FDYD^%Q?F%\\]E ZVG ')Y!G:)A6J$)#HXIA\nM+531T*ABNT;C\\U\",;%_?PU$Q ^-T7\\C8]V4ME()[RP.P9!SC\"NP,H\"/.D_R_<9L43>\\7?V#!=\nM?T>-%A125,5+&E0S]6D8]X.<,\\/PGHF!+(HRHU3;).\"?7.GDO/:ZO8!J6.,'\nMN8!XM[(.KKJJB2--@NPQ#B ;\"TZ]-J27T\"WC\nM+N'_%.CFL]>,MT\"<&)*NM607967[>_K&D /;B0Q[CV&3NS^;V(,V@-)%#X;;\nM=GH^'[ >\\AIFE%4O*Z'<.OAA)!4,[:R*#&YZ$5A*FLMKV\nM@$[!!R.O$Q04%\"D +$+OH:O>P0N$;-\"0] @;0%!;\"&AOW/L/N! FT)0PL4\nM $<8! J0,J\" 29!K[A 5K_L!\"D19/&> LO@\"L;@&K^<0A99>@U1%80X]%T8(\nMF-B%A.ENN#A 1L]OIJ8\"!'Y$M?_5;E2#).Q>/@F-X9,D3=/A'65 ]Y\"0$I5#\nM)2VW32%X);,]LT+ 6V@X)JX.T5?,MUL[B,)%B8AHY_MA6?_7):IY( *6B WE\nM#J^PT^M%_,':\"3&>Z\"%@J.860-7*TP0\\=H%*)RL#IH7QC5/QYI'7YI'07, [Z1)? F\"JJ=MU=.RZM'6ZB&UU)/P\nM[[U3GWJ/'1%JQ:S'F%V+/QW)'[TP@3\\,6ER(T&0KH>FB1N2Y)'FZ_\nM9 ##H0O](\"MJ-LI)V44IEC@.P)#-X8/[XG3HM\\&X+Y+$:I?&H<\\X@\\9A3TT]>MD)\\+D+!=*M\nM7H6RP.(+)OVY\">RI;,$,F8CP5?SDZQ\\N/@\"N.<#S] SB_AVHO3\\AQ+-/1^QT\nM66\"U0#0 > ]U]@4^QH+@/21_\"]_ 7^B0+UB-OL)X;P-C6N/JI<='7^($N\nM?QX_[7-=W:0/VJ7_]#U=&'[S/4'C2AL$#2T@:!)6T\"2/H'$>!E;]$3>CDL6=\nM.M!)GMBI_?4>=)'T5T].1$!RIN?%Z:T ?B!!%\\;]H'&_W$*AR .R GBW/R#.2F>Y$FP1&>*9-8M(F\nM:9RN:TZ5PO$BQ4:MQP_S$I@VDF@('Y<2>.J!YMC1VZN(WH+\"4RH'!IMI37:.\nM=T!2.8(C!Z!Q3+S?YG0X[I8=-+;*RWD%P$/YTUG\\0:1KI)^\\[\\]OFI/?)\">_<4G_:$U^ \\_);]RV/WQ=\nMY/'M-SAA3T#CDX!&;P,:>$] XW6\"(GT%1?H\"&E<%-)HC!*!!] 4T3B,H$EA0\nM)#\"@\\55 H[L #3PPH/'Y_8*BA05%\"@,:9P4T^F8$H$$4!C0N\"VB2%-#$<0_>\nM+6$^*8J:%$6M@:A)4]3$\\77?1-.JHHGCZW:)IE%%$\\?771)-LXHFCJ^;(YIV\nM%4T<7_=$- TKFCB^;H5H6E8T*>N'5F(XFZ:49;1\"\"8JPKQFA IDH9ZKIG:\nMAS\\W@([T .(#V!G\\8%YS';#>Q.OBR/*LEE7Z8/$@%T)K=EG95,U[H;!FI[7-\nM XNS.'$S*AT@X5HV1U5/0L#FL.HIGMLV=[5- MGFHK8IAU7S\"Z-+<2,YE%]L\nMTRQBF_+0MXB%F)1II!)@&T06_*0!?M('/^W#M)H \"U5\nM^)-K_-&J_(&9Z\\#%:3:[<(XJ85 :Q<2@:9?D$2GN3Z3,!H+NW.%PSO\nM #9JSG\\]'(D]OY\\A+9C[VV=9YIJ_5O\"!*#8C.L'NW/Z&0\\3UKT>!OSY\\!0$T\nM71?#.IPK&/R#=)+Y.H6]?@'#NQMV_@(>-J[($AC4(W#S1VVHD;;A@/9/Z9\\<\nM@)7=AC_).Y\\Y[<2<=DJ7@SD.3;.W*H@;3F3/S)-DCBQ]#IY).7D:\nML\"LJ%.GB*:6D+\nM8SNLRZ>0Q];N%N!?KB5]% 4&N.+&\"9&I8$/&;CXP@''D]LE1\\?UPS=PBZ[\nM, 90&0'>)@'_Y$J7HD$KGULUM/\"2<56^N&AS5#&ZN^; %L2FA%O]0,\\8+\nMS)2:1Z%FNG4%\"I3W\\&,5O?61X=G7[^$*)\\45+$D+7$$'%\\ 5\\/RX A8TAFI*\nM*T(P2SN@=HHM W'XFD= Y5:VHA,.V#RY(V[@\\R TV+!Q!]C0&IZ0Y6PPL5=Y\nM7$^/$=>=H#3I=?.0@#FS>\"N+0ZX=&MF^(ZM[8,J%+^\nM5M47!.%IHCX4)X5@EIG!MYGIJ56T\"S.B=9B!GE;SY3-F:\"._X4T5S='(E;\"%\nMH_V$LX;>U7!LTQH15&UMQYN:Q!.<#VB+\\@;_-$:H5?^0Z-1L?W9.?X__3YA-+&S\nM6V%M!V!D?*$%(_,G7X)-CQ$M>PSHTB6_CP$O)@HF\"B+:LD2VYD![+@&HUX<$\nM[-L)-0)U1YE UN!*U)H*I*WVDVMV\nMM^<%#<39]MK*Z3F],\"F[R>3FUT_IRM%\")*CF#J3F\\1JN4KXUK%4C02AP5,T(\nM-ZS%%=2/#K+,J==?\"$5'JY# Z9GFHS4#/E#Y2J_RY6/9;F[^;ZFBJ*&F\"(\"W\nM#,@$7#B\"0H-0=?LM4L'ATRBGM?\nM!M54\\>/65[!,E8D#IV#9%!B4']O#T[P/_J5%-_I18[D7K8 N@3/+>WFIJ1(&\nM<\"I.@]X'%?OJ.K&B7Z+2Q00:@>E*J6(LU0#GG'[Q^]4!1JJ7S=1/?.%U>0+0\nMHSSI;YAKKS/\\A!6]V *8EE8SB-Y2-$=H%3W4 FPI@FY>D( T]S]@X9LC&V[-\nM\"\"2ZW'Z\\[9#\"-&T++E&:I>1%\\Q0;\\W'[#\\1N@^3I VSJB9<[7VR'<\\SY<\\[K\nML4<5[X!N1PL@)XQIVC2.N@@_8(#AZ]TUVG=;XZG\\S?D-UOY@V!,&L\"9)%(!6\nMU0P7F #'X8K3,; ;-21D\\N. 9=8^C'@G&5\"S1P]R6S=% 1(?;W]5<:__J!'X\nM]>30L6P:_0ZD*<@3RN.9OCU];0%WTR*H1&]8WT;1<%J[MZ*%VM<70Z<8 !< \nM1-RN@*BW9A:)9YG*6LR:!I8WZFI \\MH>4I'B9M@'&;+7&/+P]%:< JC))M1>\nM)!Y]48.8-,HS%1*QM5\nMX9QL'/ *NJ+?[,ZCKF^\"=S=6<.MI0YV<0<7V6N\nM%4&8@Y=E3IHPQW&9*P]SL+_,R?_MS$ECYCK&'&PS\\$\nM%Y#[5O!0W3H;F^T\"A!NB/$29L=W$!*F*0)+@'%<^KX.)W0\nM$X!X!^G=;GA.H%YH-5C[2JBL[P=J8*4RS'C-6#'Z+R:[/8P F4'B]93$?,=?\\ )%[UY;#M^PK[>_I;WW:B\nM0'R= N9T%(/;NV\"43K<;RV$,WOW5FF6+3Y[#9G$>;L;0Q?N# KRIS:D+#_; \nM)!FS=%/X9/4.E,$H\\Z/_&^'F :2*;!)E\"+;HOX2:\"TE?W< OQP_>8$?^Q4^H\nM/E%B,N*JN(&8)6Z$IP_\"C9 O :S^('C\"QU[L'7_<^QTCAW0L4ON<'R@8W<\\X/@\"Q[[BV0T=^T4+QQ\\Z\nM]H4,CC]P[\".V=@3'GI_\"\\0F.?=ZQ+SAVL\"&.?W#L@XX=PK$;%7%\\A&-_].P2\nMCCW.L4\\X]O03GIK453[#]_G./96YZ[CV#'\\^XYCMW.4\nM*SEV4T=YE&-?\\Y5+.79 QT[EV)>].Y:XO,Z=V?,%GCW+L[OX,PGC:-=R[M]#\nMG/VU9T]JX7ALQS[CV+,=#U#E@/.\".[ZO@UZV9Y?V[ &./7V'XP4<._D%W7;L\nMKXZ=P+%3.O8\"QQZRPO$&COW&V:9%!Q ,^8HIQN \\H4L(.-U[#SY=]T8(Z>Z$9S=H_D?:UZMXT6)80XV\"N^F=\nM(2Z@UT@(UK(*_RP@<^D^LVN*1*LAGS, %<,V\"(,]&] +S,2\\/.;I7\\$MXQX:\nMM]'M\\N@VRAT?W4J @=4!FNGT>G=Y5'E[ !:^9)!ROD!IB'EZ^:EO_Y%=NB[?^!-CFZR!H-]C\">[H(D=+U(+S+]4!$.0.S_<.6\nM(#^4?-OOX$-C: ?TZ:\"UQ/@2/,<%$U\\>I'J^8$+FC:X$II9GAE\nM\\BBS[ -@6$(*;AM MX#J3@?XODAY+\\MPW\nM-;]#LIV?Z5P$7!Z-I_TWM$22! Y%>_,%(T:G)T:>78 8Z2)U\"_/*Y-,\nM@7%Z8(3+%S#Z!;FI<*J: N/TUQNC:P%P^_J$5Z1Y^OO^E C3(R 56MF.PYCP\nM]JJB&; RRBMJM/7%:%,J@G:0P'V $OI&* D$::_/O.Z\";'FSATHSMU-=E(OM#'/Q3(-^\\]H]B!4EW#DL0UR_WI'#1COP-F!.1,^VR$N/JIU/0[3\"W&&V+@KUYQ5\nMM?I%F?.!9_IPA4+7QYMUZFIUN%:;7VY +0?R\nM7K&5$>@\";A^&5T2,\"_Q.>6R_[$:(-A!BM\nMP =G&)Q\",:X.;8\"T66Q[A7-[OM66N8=0DED<0&&+T[\\.,-MJ<+2$W-9197Z!\nMQ!.)4P3YJ*/F[\\^43\"FCFHDFC2^W2/E01!,YU0HUJ6\\\nMJ#I$#[=F#9CY[?((DS#J1.!B@\\6IUU6X'H/:=@D5$N&N3RHZD1T]/=M_7U/%\nM5&G!\"GCQM)64LK;7\\S^B_5$3!\\@D9/0 =YL0F&M3A#TOX-4?.D0#^;]#OO.C\nMGRO_>! &PMC]KU.R?0L>/^H4<@\"/]0D#DZ\\GHWS\nM/WM/A\\;Y 080:<\"D\\J$&? HMN8!+H>\\6<\"ETPP,NA39OP*#0S:Z=Q['S>O8>\nM%DF.W<>QS[&H_N/8U5@D!W+LF*X]B$-1 SZ57FC I](R#?A4)NAA[@#W';NI\nM8^=WK 6.[W?LWF!O@/XJ&L!X:0!%2%OH+,, ,\\(,=U[OFT )0[SOUF#Z;K#K\nM\"G=:]_/L!IYWF+[9\\\\-T8S?&]:$,QI7L*[#-@O[Z\"-?P\"\nMUK:=MKZ=-C]H\"J=31K-)AOE4P$8/W<2L (5$8>N*'D(Y0+95#D2G!O%BD 21\nM%S(VJ?@ F!=IR31GNG_[D$G3IE9/!63!\"QT7RM\nM/8'1< =_1DE076V5=3YW14S@HP#-M\\0C?[^ 2/8\" I$0NTMRN@EJ60D F1A,\nM?-EM@M-2.$^-TRV#:8-]\nMK?3,Z0H8GL9TS)M<250@%&1CC5<2\\$\"=?X&_:$T&G*5$AY\"TY/H$-KZ'4!9%\nM2\\7Y!?,?&C0XA2%@XB0 54=\\ ?P5BP&CR 2T&/T$BW[: HKA?C^^J@+D^#_[?>]1HZ<3[90I\nMZ?#/FG6]R$BHY0.#3YQV[0P'SYNXQQ,^V,M].L#HP:-/S[IS>=8[EK1QK\\OO\nMYQL>(&-L?6&T%<.883&L>F@;Y\"^?]%>OC#\"#V]I+HQTK;=BP?>/2%\"TO1\nMT;A^2D0_+(43;P59!_,6][C3[8'V\\D3OPP0%2&M.P@8'TEUI@+=)VP)4]V>T@= F5X)Y[J\\N*=?$*) *:CK.B%(\nMIO\\N$+C*8%T#$Y:7=HWS8,KT!>S;B30&8(AT6PQ%RZ(%N;0TV_G,Y@WPIE9K\nM](P7KM? 3*&JOB:XGD%?K)D3!2 @!!3M[*\\DKJ3]< .KPY9%7D\"D,PS0X?R@\nMA6AL>8(5)(:9!HR=;$Z#((DLMW1QUY<#OUWBY!D;-8?F;SL4<.OEMOZ_ZU$M\nMDMF(9=')\\/%(S' 27C*=]M-[;10[0% Z&$?B%9TWJO;5\\5%.ZHD5R1?U%+]CZ%1\nM;XYX<\\*3>XNK$QY=23&6XN@/>7BQWQ] =BDP]^T'0%#V9\"FJ 0I-5U.>J;^I\nMEPMP*P=TI^Y?:5PS=&TY-P@=H93D\\,%+YE[M&,[!B$MZCY\nM:H+)51+WBP.@!T\\G=MS<\\>3H\\MT NL;10;VZT4%U@8/[G]X_ONB?4\\! );=T\nM?=65]MIAA..:& ;2A6/.+$>;)5O-L3QL)+,V-(G*$$EQ7PL#R\nM!^$DM'\".T&@.R/JO['^X9<+GL.J_H\\3?0#1^3YS*SA8DI[2@ 0\\!RB8C7O+5\nMUR7M+LQQC0K,\"8*X50B)P?#$A.0RQ'&>\"U(V$Y]A;@A+\";(O5KY+6?<)^>CC\nM3#,&S&EDKD\\'G\\!!>F8OGZL6/I<6P:E@V7'J[CC#!0IH@Z$6>96QL4TY=036\nMICI#@L53C3(C;(>RF=(3'%^G!F@JY0_466S*PW-=MXDF][,T2RQ:<[9N1;VVVHAM!Y6+&9Y!9E!5C$%' = AT<+($\"X\nMV@O1)$4&D,\\P!].(! ]N\nMN3_5\"$F&0QQIYAY6S;WM$C$^F7&<+0/ );V)(3\"+Z:)D%\nM**^N?';EFRL?/:Z]\\VK&7KE9-??%W@<;V^K%!X2_*K#%8#Q8.X\"BZ,%NS4,<\nM[!4]@-PV!6TMHX=E!&0KM*N)%M_T*R]BHZ+.)[UB;@N@97<:I3W=_J U-W8@\nM4IG;BW)[4E11RWM:'I1>%./,KF3'(O>K;F6K#=EQ;DM/$\"D29@?$ZO^+<+'8\nM?M$1$.7>V%.$>STZ_G.WZ@;R]K44\\Y=J>HCQBTTZ4W_!40(YC\nMJE^35.@\"\"4,ID=J6-2-?0!6)\":DU48536MX2543;(SRZOE-),/,;98@9!VM4\nMDP56MX44!T+WV@A\"1GU'K,4&>%8@S6H7A_7XE(1!^*9ZPE1'UQ\\=6_[2H)X:\nMMA/ =@,IWAEDNX-LVEKVV-=CX%7#>WUC=H^-_4HSPA8/.M9>NE3P'^3R 5.S\nM+_/HX*-+\\Z!V/T'R%3U(#/P+XY^8.*IK:IR6/T$ 4?3\\+XP'*5M%9C3PTL2G\nM)N[9Q%V9^,R,!M;:^-C&O=:X.QL?6EEC*SE1'%^^45C)46K,<1!NE)D87OE\\\nM(WPKT3M%AO->Z2WF^!0F3^S<]YU;B7=ZX'Y_(_(HDY4O]N_9-T(#7ZU!-1O$\nM9\"$$03E8)^>6*@BXM>6Q!0''-YMN/[UC?VW4Q5\\%!A\\_ P RKFBCZE5_49\nMG;(KWEQQ&SLII++O!YLV9$^064/(+&'<3.>Z!HHW#Z!&^\\I^C<*5S!85L ) \nM51+B[ZCPAJP9( .1(AK%'0F& <9W(P0U!+ILP:Z,*\\X@@]U#3N&.*L53F(\"*\nMEI \"$*Z/(U)P1Y'2P?. A2!%*T&*2DJ%,X 4.;[+L6EL@S@X 8@#:0#B(':-\nM=K!KM)Y=RU+82-*!7R:XO6)S.&N3),(P;$)J>G.YX=C.M/:\"' 7 GAN\"/3IW\nM1H#S8B]=V[ %!H>#8^>OJ')UTK@W:4Y)6A!RZ^-:)ZKY7 '08X+V[0%*H1H7\nMBAL .%.;=\"F Q!+K-G)%)D<8MFNA[!=8BM[(S 6T<7=SO&!/H!^V/&[ /C.O\nM/U\"P['!%Q* Y'L!:%]I[]P,Y4)_>T:F\\B>N& B[VZ7^F4_D:O\nM]G=.EXM! GUG,!5?/[UB_HU6F+9S\"9*\\?*N(&,QR;IDM*EL\nMRK-##9-RKV<4>7^[;F].#15PD;[[7VF\\Q_%S$22S@FA\"IA\"\"T1U'W]A+47X\"\nM%VRBP*4'9+]>UMC4SRO#NV:6!6I/UHS B:T9!W1M:P9 T?'HYM>__!76.^^1\nM_HO]M0B,;E'L^TNX\"AJ='M0)JR46UC#[?\",H*CF 0U+;2J?8N%C2*\nMS%T4>' 2W7/CY5Q+,\\1 MXDRHV2U E<,5.\"ZILOS\"8\nM-%8H@81,MD.SWH#UBX/'FN=;0F1$2J2Q48(D-TIX(4.@^VJL,>$ POS)21.YVR&^W8Y)L(?^6$FZ'S0PF\nM394$R<&IO_B!%MX^)(9YBIYC/#>@NQRJ:ZZ#!'M4Y@*1@P\\$1=(]\\@)A6PG7\nMP'#)HPRM#B740*!KO?9.\"2SL#:8W]:D#7[_B2%I7!%[SPPNG?X'%$/TGI! 4\nMU_R0@@((M_%(#))O::<''5Y'\"!+&3*K3?1%IQ=!&Y^FAOFD'\\X87FB9PV0XR\nM@!-&L%IQ-KH?&'B\\OQEK&937^$%^4 6R+ANEIB>%E38NE,1\"\\E&6Z X: )-*\nM5(P(>2>'_EX,4V1HD4H7R#JAP\"H&:E(L!CN2].P(%RK<_16@F!T5/6EZ -+_\nMD;9U;H^T_SXYR?_QK771Y Q:@XM2S:PA((E8=KT,,!EC=M 8+)FVURPIPD-Q\nM3#6&(F#(_18Y;310B5!KUO.48,U)3R@1$$W<(U;(1:+H'AU-@+,G<%H*T7< \nMO5SBE;VH%S&9/)EG;_]H0(AT3=!IB28']Y8]4 #G=7Q?/FZ:Q06E#J>$F=&6\nMH@^#02VA7PU,P^OE9SLNX\"VI&FFJY6Q,J)LV(>J/79LJ,PH2B6LP%X+79M73\nMD>HT?_:!AW4AK>.9!&)ZB!M\\H6J)K!R27V?QA 'RL0F>RBP6.^8H,L#1F@TO\nM..EDM:[9EH79YP/8.,I<0Q.-XNY5GX;TA0?$]D_CKHX Q V05,?=^!9+W> '\nME)I)I0^4L$8#FT'F1 S]E405@'UQ!4^I+I+G]SZ.X^I$]24\\+X)*5,6=\"C\"@\nMI\"'[80WK:L_)#A0M4!\"V;JG9:QN$-:%._# 141Z<[@E\\,-N6B^64;\\3@1%UG\nM(MK7STA6<[9GQ^KNV'%YOUY&DT!X$]$DP1S7/$G=\"Q(P,T]\\8!?M\"D@$5X 6\nM\\',D $P*Z,:'F&!,%Z,' \"E>J-CL@4;[6X'7Q;_PO\\)#-G%)S58W\",4J[_5/\nMJM=(T HUMT3-]2W)441]50[,,]:&\\2Q2/,+#-[%,3ARH9I(3QJSZ-:,)-_XW\nM$G\"0UD,N[ZR$X;5*5!M0(7N.%CH&J_:K0.=0)7H$Z#>1_R?L-7V_\"@$X1OF\nM^ B +[GDHP5+[#I,V=,:0+XH0R#.V*.-Z\\0^6KX)_!WEV4?3-_&73V .-V*V\nM NC1]L#> />C]9L,E1T@^3\"&QP6$SJ&V7VF NP?MOWS9;7\"O.<+B&+*&!SQM:'NB=:MI\nMN2)KFRI%M>%>ESO]\\3,R6*N%D#Q!\"R&((PS%'H\\R&GW?B.C/_OL4-_ ;GOXW\nM ';Q^!O\\SW?FWX.!&.J5]\\M5X:Q_2?*IP)T@Y;L<<5/^QY&< $?:@$NUVML@\nM8J/_&K(+5?\"C7H\\%GW?\\DZZ5Y59H=H!_']SSM7\"\"1G67<]#VKERT.!]73*SU6\\QE'JC:)/8#\nMCZ<%WM9YP=]8HA35;A+1)&X$@+6\\T@@9R:>Q%S2[;7!H*5V#QPTJEL!HRL#E\nMD39N@-%7_C^J^/4['LN,7H',HE80:QBDYNL?!+9HA^_VAHUFQ]J.B!O/>H$!\nM)I(.=MK;=YD6T.RVL(^;W9BM?F3X_22&YU]K^/[*7@[E^.M#$';*!R@Y-_U7\nM*$\"Q!EKF695G&'\"C_7LHT>-/.NVQ HD)3M'04B*781.J ;5*ID^A:R,UV2+0C>=+&F]QH \nMVA&V9(\"SYYM>:L 63PV?/.!L)/SKB\\G3=5.\\ R/%UY-Z\nM)P[?,1QOD8Z,EG4:P;H=GVC>V#? [@V,$E*.P0Y GA1R/(?C-=;5\\0[\"LS-X\nM=@?/CN#9OI7\"LUMX=@;/[N!IV]S77^F*I'(\\B.,]UF52%DA8 W0(SRX!:W@/\nM:\"F!\"B.-UZ\"\\UG@!)+S8P:NY ]$,!=YO0_0V]\\$:/DP1NA-:=HR.1!#_/O@X\nM 1+28M!6^N@#B2^][_CUVQ4UOGNP#[#FAYJ6K(#__F=8MP+I4Y[N%;SA2-.F\nM-)SB$/^Z:CUP9I#<*9%0T:J'B+XE/U3BXCM,;M;D8@O/KR?BNS3ZB/O7YT3/\nM5A]*XF7_38T;/WA$&4E\"&5E+&:F,UMCD8%/VU,+\\'L3EN)FQ=C\"\\585F%)Z;\nMO2].^/EF'Y(6#H'3[#/LVZWLT5SD5J\"+8R\\O#/0V21<\"MF/Q\nMOF?X6PI^_UL8J,EJ!598N+<\"0G Y3T RR6X,]\\-\nMD- \\_<\\ &E0[+MZ8KH:8XR$XCM.E>#CZXN'W[S4T ?/W#VO+_--K#'AX6K.G\nME\\ >ISURL#]RT[+;NP -??N'E2%A?.1>'T\"R#UOV].OPO+5&,'IUA;Q3=PN8\nMU;W]\\3]]??[3S=^S;HM/'W(1]7^[:O\\SCYT8GS[LV7+G8T7TF=_4\nMMF^D_AG4C@\\!-0=4_:AQ)W;OQ0-]&P']_?B+-\"C79_RA).P7__JM.Z/+^0\\!\nMCV?JROGK']Y#00Q[>4YX)?Z-\\N[=CX^X*\\B^3@I/?S_=^0@RO'_F_,7.<+,[U_CTS&15&._2N@DE&4^7\nM:&R(>($J:.(-#,#!$3\"/]V70@< GB(_\"F YA3&LPIB<8TPR,Z0+&\nM[-,'$.S#UXY@;!F%3ZD1%< *C*9_I&,:[-?Z=R#YBN\"@&Z+(-:W@&LW@>@61\nM8:V^4P7VYKNMR3B\\&)N0QZ%LUFY%9VGT]=&S1U'=L3G=X3];Y9AI$4KM\\W\nM/\\!+,]PA7D]?KL$=YML-Z&3H+3_)A'G=ZKIV@%MNXRX@UD(B1S 8OA!9U,;G\nMPM9PV#K%N+ A)!A%#DN&.S(4I\nM_S3OT/5(F S8R)@LPR-0,G*!DM5 BQ]!BU_!C*>$3LKXEZ^XS/;C>G_PT:6+\nMUS]LF=;G=,MH=-[!LP?=L/R;YSQ4/VV A(Y]U+$7.'9ZQV[@W'MG\nM./_#N8?6\\/R!:X=U[0BNW<^U@[CVA2.>3_#LC4$\\'^)LKW/L(H[]UK&7^'8N\nM]_[@WN5;.![\"L;.]<'R$8Y=,X7@)QT[FV2?\\^QD,.T <][X8P_$Z[EUM!T0X\nMBV/72.'X%E&YV [75WMW)9TT0!?7GK#!\\3\".W<6QQSCVU\"#V+_6VO/N-8Y_/\nMX>I?O'O:\",_G./9^SR[CV,T=V[.*./>B );_$Y85\\NYMG'W/MO[Z=S+6SI+ \\D6OG56(&6.;:%SS1S1R[1@['G_GV\nM2G<[E[,]Z8\"QQW+L,P4EE/>^4)\nM_^\\[=MT?CN=W[J@)7&_FV3UJ_-=LIL*\"@9#BD('90P8001M,WRIZK0=,VPOT\nMC-/O.D##L\"]Q8)R=;N\\N!7,*SK[IL_$E_C\\H__255H+3.]QDWACY\nMMFU,-!V*P4[N_^GZOH)CMR8@#05=6U'>0P_7924X[DUX;B]FS6T'2*;[I3_8\nM)P#>G:Z3DK7@(,,/DKP-P_T7G_W\"[!U N3$M*\"D\"D/H[@.(0 T8W:S\\:=CF1E'<22%M\"-T)5>TQ6\" RKR@@8R0&=W\nM@Y@!0!5[W\nM##M,E[XR@!#E\\ZNBP\\#>G?#L+GBW\\D\\7]/]_8[*,=N#P# 6NC.Y8V*_(1'CE\nMP19RY47Z\"@.(+S1>UX=(,\"ILL(\"QI^\\WP3D]IAW*\\. U\"Y*2!;(C8!*F;?;L\nMJ8P\\7V4FF-K#X\\*D5\"BHK07.+1C8J'H\\'C9;T,!B9%\nM/U';I%I&/Z!7]4;7@UMZ=<*C,\\/RUJ\"B+;QM\"HRX/Z!(V!UYBK!, EQ>';$L\nM;L1HA13:=O$);R^&QO\\5T>?V7^P]^#C;;G8]\\5__\nMQX_R>]P2QV4/P!R4^+7[17M0@NF1'.O]@;C\"T[%H93B7??;J/EO][$)#!/N5\nM9U-\\_009]4^6=\"T:G!)!$-1;I=?6\\JI-=28'@]H$_'T%K#0!!6U8= 4EI-F!\nM0(CW+0'Y%+6B%1\"!8R/*>C%LA8*.R&H#A-EBRP&ZYDJEPQZL2! ;MH#:CG:2\nMU'2/X^MVM>+T^O1L93NI LG]-]T8ZJY91#/M+@&@^F;.SB[QBTE17Q!2D%T=S1::6]7^P09W=4]/ /39-YNZ\nMQ^U7(_U$_[8$;&\\#VY0T4\\QC18=?GL?ZSW', ?'CAKS\\H@?* RVVPLOWS(D-\nM!?G$EI+<5@Z@-=S>$ QH8>M_\\ WM 8;V<4.+\\_H#I3@[[+-B)B+9Z,6\"#>C^;T\"_^O-S!;.\\\"K:\"?=M;PPS63:,]:6ZE^?('+FJ2-S-\\H86-OK6S;6VQU6$X#:CKB_U[\"B284\"\nM0 ?'EWL#).AWX&\\ 5SE#D\\=Z9X\"^ [\"BVU_OUHIY!*OWQ5L('7HP<07\\+)II\nM#_X!%[9B.:Y6R]\\4,VLJE[L=$FS>_!9#Z:Z(6O^QODL O\"&0<'[LTT@(GV8K\nMO4]3\"=.VY_D9VOZ-&&J_?:,*7I;3,PWAY<'A,!L 4B&8%1(/+8@Q8[USR.F^\nM+%9P\\WADSC@M]!V$@COY?#EWKMZ?%+&;NQW+3!WI;E05X;6'!\"2@^Z-X(_Y)J@:AX!]J30T;J\nM52)^5-D'!R\\ \"_2H[VK#\"7CI]2^(;$&>(%\\2E]IT?GZPL=/:F+GL!TIHNM@3\nMA>6)IK9:9@B!0C+$Y@__P>PGM]EFO52$\"0N.;F\"$P)#R)*)#84CL;W\nM,3C=#8#I4!I@E\\?-\\CNFU)=ZH%GU51/'J_'Q ^A/H$H4\"KYI )7#:3HTZH?B.!B4-J!G-M# ]:\nMP6\"#L;JI!6\"S!M\\L4+XOK\\09C<=J]CKA3!+M@&NRU[5*YUM :U\\O(--DY2+Z\nM\"%4R9\\\"Z>SQ&.%\\@)64X&NI%*&5$CB/:1S.]&$KX'.#>1R*;=X8VP5#+_WMV\nM*(\" Y*I ;2BT<01H0[!31-9-[)$^U4$%0P]^4 #0_,^T,#P@+81%##T7@0%\nM# _H&D$/RP-N%E#\"TJ81=+#T:@,=+\"WP0 ?+ X*Z]@I)'Y#)M<X>U(=K/SM*;X=>H$6CL9HH('D 8_%<,[CV.%DW4GO\nMV%N<>XUCQ_/L/HX=2POO0(Y]R+,'.?9VSQ[EV&,=NY1C'W;L5([]Q;%7.7;$\nM!3HX&G.!#HXN<)5U<#I?00=''QS0P>F ?3O3_0HXCQW@>'\\_/! 98YM\\[ ]\nMJD&KXQWL8$%@1QDC2?< ,E]?T.O!K!^_-C;KCU-5P-I^8A/MFR\nM=M..+0OPCO-DW]XY'^Z<;U:FX<)E6Q8DDWV7>P6Z=(N?;=TY00,N<.A;N&F>\nM\\B+F&TWSW?%0I]S CPV3;%_9-C9MW]@V)8%&0WA8NFU=C'T:-)RV#;D59DRL!:8(2)8 QMTL73-DGL[MRS(^)QE517.'IMI&2][6#9F@EIDR'+F,\nMJ]4P=S!H3K0NW;%HYDFG9>_+)GN \nM0M^^76.4@PPRY]/&K=/W4+B#O5SO-]BL&G4O]M!)J0X%H4\\(C7Z\"QD%.I9OG\nM=BT;'UKF/[K.4UV1BIZMF&H'D&2K)JA-.FAPY2ZDG 3!#V'-T$$BQX^^I6.5\nM!K53]W2/K#G\"L;#$F8-XIIM4?N/GA:.9'7&Y<]/:F3*)!CS1Z[]VQB4J&GM'\nM3WD/\\XQ;B5SILV+#,),@FE'[J&B4\"S!-@4 %+A4852!6@6(%$!!9> >(:$,O\nM\\++ 3LD^6N\"K8K\\MD+C Z +%)?M\\ :;P\"C_8 U>P4,YS(-*!6HY=[( >L,#\nM-P^4M>S$!QB0>SMV]P/_#V0 0+E' BW@.@DB23;)PTO\"I(F7:(E<[UB&P2#Y\nMJ52ISHRAS\"S]-D1HD>T@CRDX%B!ZS94R7,)XMM6\\9))476^9: >AK$5P.\nM'U=@-V )VR$HZHCM,BC*W^G4)$-+=-\"\"#S#*:0\"=5]HAA_GFBR:DS\\Y!AQZR\nM9=/LAKLT,^NA4I-\"J3@KF#AV\\?$ P1XA9#J C&?/ZC^@O([G_S-4GU$ERP#!\nMHPX(=:\"_A$.R3\\A.)YLGL& [5O0#T>W!@@==$!3+0UE\\L!-9F>O0K\nME!][42EB7FM1@$^F?]$K9KF/I3ODS09D3H;9+*5+;C.:[&+W/1XBYGI!9$S(\nM\\?6><##[\\ #9#/?]E3T_LX:T@A1C!P79IUYC@HR!#YASZXKA?R^1FI.!\nMMR8NI]C3N.)LJ/XK)#V\nME K(8:?6F3F>QAP8IMFD?&9:&D[.74/M+G@XH?P8JJ939O@96BZ=3C+I$:R0\nM:AT@60[,'Y]JI2PKTF$.,3A*.*I@-*;?GC$*?@K3%;GGP@@.^B*W.))(G0PE\nMU;G6!J0\"94_3M&\\!^[)XRWS=TMWLB)#6RV25@PEFB:XQ*!,+3X4,6<>8N:SB30O3=*(BZS)ENHFF4V];QJD:H$\\Z \nM(DQ+E9(TRAONPPS\":SAA9R+=DV$^KC\"CT0Z)H[91EC9RGR!&2YAG@V2:K1IC\nMWI:-/#RT$@ZB\\1KV4)'3\"&:U_;8_,8<.-[>0)(M\\J]SZ(A0$+R]\\EOQELAJ1\\D!T/11HDDN;\\$+2VB.*[#@H0&;\")9D\nMYW(&SU_.T9&I90<@[P 3@/ >X-%&NW%SY=D?W*EZ&0S#H\nMVD/(NQ')TN[\\ 1 ;2,O(NVU)-TU--*>7,VX,E0TPH*(!_Q=%P/]%#N#_(AWP\nM?Y$$^+^(!_B_B GXOX@\"^+\\(#_B_\" 7XOP@6\\'\\1!.#_(F# __T @/_[ 0#_\nM]P, _N\\' /S?#P#XOQ\\ \\'_!@#_VB!5RT:J+V7MTC'TP>[=7K2ZVJ]\"Q488F\nM_]/EJ/G_O^X3&\\6_$#C=&M*ZF\"B'YNV;/$[8X(#KC-TR &,EBC @P/\\VD:=$\nMFQE@8Z.2+4)5\"U4S(VRCO^[ ].8++O:+3U\\'\\^4+L.[4QD4%>H1\"SK1FX@XD\nMGVO*1W_+QUD7_&^7H15KUDX4TQ[1NG^0K9JSU#W P<01A+.K6?:$4X@SJ7DI\nMJ5V-T$9\"M:OFN-W#,_?B%OUG;EIE8?)!8U%,\\D)C1F*K-N^KM&DA'\nM\\DKG#)CF?=!QB /@IO_3!@R V 41*R%BI^,V1=6,CVM6AL\\A['FL!_*P9FQP\nM4\\V7:M9[S;3C8W+1!JR/?7 ]@>)I'YB;&Q7@34F9Z_F^X&\\$>E[$LIM8'L.7\nM?/!/@7P7VC^*%4*V-\\@>X:\\L^<#?!(9$FH\":]X*:GS^PU)K7.$UIK6@'!KRJ\nM&;X -V'J[H#\\B0C(G=#<\\+R],5\\'VTE@*V4!>9$U@N::23WC1)YI6L\\XE6=:\nM&M*PZIAKPX/_(S!;RS2M(P94A,'! 8$ #N2-.EP0:\nM2Q:.A36U)FU=;'RQ588%O)?BO?#%WL\"_RU(M@. <@]1W?I_S\nM&0L0,JWP8-TM;-\"_,):\\%#\\?Q\\\\JS\\\\(OB5JUZ_9(('=TCE3HB<2 (<. *Y0\nMP+D?<+H+.+V^H0%PBLS#F=HHCQQ!>4:D.^R19B_ KR64YVJJU@#HV'/J)X3*-B)J\nM+&PXU*,= ]PE6#VR+RXJ9*J)@J3K-+%7^\\>$$H6'!^>:U__05?ZGB&\nM\"Y-!3H=HYC,Q7^&@[ 4.';R?(%]RQ$[7PK4HWB 7SX]N3LV>$RB4VG?/ %=N\nM7[B=;@NU^\":UT!D/<#UQKPH ST$,BYCIJ9J':<49H#6S(8KP\"C77-5!&$I\\J\nMP>7K\\2.4'NX]OT SG?@PJL72J)H)&H#&34'KC'<4]*J@M<*R3.X4 ?(MBFRA% /&@K$$\\-%'$$\nM*)^::^T(<(4_-L I*-MG@NSG_G($>/RS 54G[3W3O-()H:T1\\@FN;P W[_>5\nM0:MQK-:M!(5L*KTB.IBHETY@/,F!G=%#.*\"FN6D6:KQ)T7Z'RE5FQP1!*T\nM\".\"2EWV B\"$2L8((MC3SW@^!C'7N[8;1Q[20+'\nMWSAV*[\\Q0!S'[NW8 |