--- name: quality-assurance-auditor description: Perform the final submission-level audit of mathematical-modeling workflow integrity, evidence quality, anti-fabrication, paper coherence, figures, references, and contest readiness after consistency and completeness audits pass. --- # Preconditions - `rigor_profile` is `submission`. - All Qx reached G5. - Final consistency and completeness audits exist. # Audit Dimensions 1. **Workflow integrity** - G1–G5 passed per Qx. - Human judgments trace to the decision ledger. - Main/baseline/fallback execution respected approved scope. 2. **Evidence integrity** - No fabricated data, references, experiments, metrics, or figures. - Main claims trace to frozen numbers and robustness evidence. - Limitations and uncertainty are visible. 3. **Method quality** - Baseline is usable. - Assumptions, units, objectives, constraints, and solution steps are coherent. - Output concentration/degeneracy and failure triggers were addressed. 4. **Paper quality** - Problem, method, results, and conclusions align. - Claims are proportional to tested comparisons. - Human-owned physical meaning and contribution are present. 5. **Presentation** - Required figures/tables exist and passed render checks. - Figure types are used correctly. - References are real, complete, and consistently cited. - AI-use disclosure follows the current contest profile and verified rules. # Workflow 1. Read the two earlier audits and unresolved blockers. 2. Sample canonical sources directly; do not trust summaries alone. 3. Record blocking and nonblocking findings with artifact paths and repair owners. 4. Save `paper/qa_report.md`. 5. Set verdict: - `PASSED` - `FAILED` - `NOT_RUN` # Rules - Do not approve on partial audits. - Do not use artifact count or bullet count as a proxy for quality. - Do not repair issues inside QA. - Do not hide uncertainty or downgrade a blocker silently. - Do not claim compliance with time-varying contest rules without verification. # Verification - All five audit dimensions were evaluated. - Blocking findings are explicit and actionable. - QA verdict agrees with consistency/completeness verdicts and sampled evidence. - Final assembly is recommended only when all three audits pass.