[Next Message in Time] | [Previous Message in Time] | [Next Message in Topic] | [Previous Message in Topic]

Message ID: 395
Date: Fri Jul 9 16:46:12 BST 1999
Author: Azor
Subject: Re: Soul Fire


I agree, I like 1hb better cause for one I can then have a shield, can't do
that if I'm carrying around a big 2hb staff. I don't think they should have
it to were Clerics can't wield staffs tho, to many Cleric's would get very
upset cause they can't use the SoO or any other cool staff they like.
I'd like to see a Cleric only weapon thats at least 12+ dmg 38 delay, 7+
wis, 7+ int or something like that. We just need a cool weapon that only we
can use.

**************************
Azor
Lvl 16 Human Cleric of the Rathe
**************************

> From: "I. G" <shadowtg1@...>
>
> But see then we run into the problem of "1hb or 2hb"
>
> Me personally I think it should be 1hb because I just dont see a cleric
> wielding a 2 handed weapon, not even a staff. I always picture a cleric
> wielding a mace (hammer if dwarf) and a shield.
>
> Now a Morning Star is close enough for me, but a staff? Just seems wrong.
>
> As we have said in the past, we are not a melee class, but I would still
> love a one hander that did over 10 dmg with less than 40 delay.
> What would be cool though is something like +7(or more) wis and a party
heal
> all or 10 GHeals.
>
> Jaxim