[<a href='12972.html'>Next Message in Time</a>] | 
[<a href='12970.html'>Previous Message in Time</a>] | 
[<a href='13003.html'>Next Message in Topic</a>] | 
[<a href='12955.html'>Previous Message in Topic</a>] <br/><br/>
<b>Message ID:</b> 12971 <br/>
<b>Date:</b> Wed Jan 12 14:56:08 GMT 2000 <br/>
<b>Author:</b> jhenders@xxxxx.xxx <br/>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: Bards and piercing weapons (was  GZ Answers) <br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-1918761134">On Tue, Jan 11/00, &quot;Reece, Tom - 25IDL G4&quot; &lt;<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:g4mntofcr@...">g4mntofcr@...</a>&gt; wrote:<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; <br/>
&gt; If you go to any of the EQ spoiler sites and look at all the piercing<br/>
&gt; weapons in the game, you&#39;ll see that a lot of them are Rogue only. <br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>What&#39;s worse is that those same weapons were rog/brd in beta. That&#39;s<br/>
right, the bard was removed from the sbd and, I think. the bloodclaw as<br/>
well. This was done around the same time we lost double attack, when<br/>
Verant decided Bards were overpowered.<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
-- <br/>
  Artificial Intelligence stands no chance against Natural Stupidity.<br/>
            GAT d- -p+(--) c++++ l++ u++ t- m--- W--- !v<br/>
                 b+++ e* s-/+ n-(?) h++ f+g+ w+++ y*</div>