[Next Message in Time] | [Previous Message in Time] | [Next Message in Topic] | [Previous Message in Topic]

Message ID: 13155
Date: Mon Jan 17 20:01:45 GMT 2000
Author: kim@xxxxxxxxxx.xxxx
Subject: Re: Rarely mentioned fact...


On Mon, 17 Jan 2000, Ryan Honeyman wrote:
> From: Ryan Honeyman <honeyman@...>
>
> > The point wasn't whether or not I could tank an ice giant.
> > Obviously I could since I survived. The point was whether
> > it'd be more effective to have a real tank tank it (at the
> > cost of losing his damage on the primary target).
>
> I'll rephrase.

Eek. I just reread that. Just to clarify, I meant no
disrespect with that statement. I do appreciate your advice
on torgors and will inform the shaman/enchanter next time.
It just didn't have anything to do with my question - how
valid a tactic is it to devote one tank to the extra giant(s).

> That was my point. You can then concentrate all tanks on one giant,
> and allbeit the bard will be attacked, he will not require the healing
> attention of the cleric to the extent you describe.

The question still remains though - does the decreased time to
kill a giant with all tanks attacking offset the extra healing
required to have the bard tank the extras, torgored or not.
Torgors obviously can change the equation, but doesn't answer
the question.

--
John H. Kim
kim@...