[<a href='13765.html'>Next Message in Time</a>] | 
[<a href='13763.html'>Previous Message in Time</a>] | 
[<a href='13809.html'>Next Message in Topic</a>] | 
[<a href='13746.html'>Previous Message in Topic</a>] <br/><br/>
<b>Message ID:</b> 13764 <br/>
<b>Date:</b> Wed Jan 26 17:31:38 GMT 2000 <br/>
<b>Author:</b> kim@stormhaven.org <br/>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: My overcrowding solutuion <br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-518431980">On Wed, 26 Jan 2000, Papa Legba wrote:<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; <br/>
&gt; Would anyone be offended by this?  It would help to bring their dungeon<br/>
&gt; crawl vision to reality, and I am willing to sacrafice a little more<br/>
&gt; realism for a lot more fun (IMO)...<br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>The dungeon crawl vision is antithical to camping.  If you try<br/>
to make both coexist, either the dungeon crawlers get way too<br/>
little &quot;prize&quot; loot, or the campers get way too much.  <br/>
Duplicating zones would ease overcrowding, but it wouldn&#39;t<br/>
change the campquest state of the game.  Even if you<br/>
duplicated each zone so many times that each party were<br/>
practically alone in their own dungeon, the crawl party would<br/>
only see maybe one special mob per night while the camp party<br/>
would see multiple.  Too little or too much.<br/>
<br/>
--<br/>
John H. Kim<br/>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:kim@...">kim@...</a></div>