>From: <kim@...>
>Reply-To: eqbards@onelist.com
>To: "'eqbards@onelist.com'" <eqbards@onelist.com>
>Subject: RE: [eqbards] PoA bard quests plus a rant
>Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2000 20:06:09 -0500 (EST)
>
>On Thu, 27 Jan 2000, Kimes, Dean W. wrote:
> >
> > I do agree
> > that a level 50 with the right equipment would beat the pet though.
>Still a
> > FBSS isn't all that common is it?
>
>No, Abashi is correct on this point. A L49 pet requires words
>and components which are very rare and difficult to obtain -
>roughly as difficult as or rarer than equipment like the FBSS.
>A lot of the high level mages and necros are using lower level
>pets because they simply haven't obtained the items needed for
>their higher level pet spells. So the correct comparison is
>between L49 pet and L49 warrior with equipment typical for
>that level. (Actually, the correct comparison would be L49
>necro and L49 pet vs L49 warrior. We're already being
>massively conservative comparing the warrior to just the pet.)
>
>--
>John H. Kim
>kim@...
>

If the comparison is a straight up duel between a warrior and a necro then
the obvious way to kill the pet is to kill the master :) If the warrior is
dumb enough to sit there and melee the pet he deserves to lose.

Rokenn
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com