[Next Message in Time] |
[Previous Message in Time] |
[Next Message in Topic] |
[Previous Message in Topic]
Message ID: 15206
Date: Mon Feb 21 17:58:33 GMT 2000
Author: Wayne Sheppard
Subject: Re: Re: Welp... it was me :)
> Message: 649
> Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2000 00:03:05 -0500
> From: "Tim Burke" <tjohnburke@...>
> Subject: Re: Re: Welp... it was me :)
>
>
> >
> > Mages can summon a weapon every level. But Verant hasn't put the level
> > summon in the game yet. Only recently was the lvl 44 Summon Weaponspell
> > put into the game. Still no word on the 49th spell. Mages are alsoDIFFERENCE!
> > incomplete, according to your own definition.
> >
> Count the spells... a class that has over 120+ spells is missing 2...
> that's very different than a class with 50 missing three. BIG
> Also, the two classes you mentioned have had what I would callsignificant
> enhancements. Enhancements that noticabley changed the effectiveness ofthat
> their class, and addressed MAJOR concerns. I'll stand by the statement
> although the recent enhancements make some songs more useful, Verant hasNOT
> addressed the major concerns of bards.Everyone has their own idea as to what their major concerns are. For some
> > Shaman had Alchemy bugged for 8 months before Verant could be convincedit
> > was broken.unresponded
>
> You think after that Verant would learn from that mistake, and change the
> way they do things. Instead the lullaby post floats out there
> to for 3 weeks?Here is just a guess....
> >in
> > Bards get about the same attention as every other class. There is no
> > hatred of Bards at Verant, just as there is no special Bard Hate coded
> > the game.is
>
> No, I don't think we are treated the same as other classes. What I see
> happening is bard issues being glanced over and pushed to the side. Inever
> said there was bard hatred at Verant, just that bards are a low priorityto
> Verant. Bottom-line - everything can't be that "A-1" priority. What IObviously you don't pay attention to any other class issues. Every single
> want to know is why bards aren't moved up that priority list more often?
> >Bard
> > Your problem is that you are only looking at it from your tiny little
> > portal. There are hundreds of things broken or missing in EQ. VerantWHENEVER
> > tries to fix them, but they do a very poor job. You seem to not care
> about
> > anything but fixing your Bard. Verant has to fix problems with every
> > class. They can't stop everything just to fix Bards.
> >
> Well, let me state the obvious... like any EQ player, I feel good
> a game improvemt is implemented - whether it's an enhancement for anotherclass
> class or a quest fixed or a bug squashed. But yeah, your right... I have
> one character that I play - a bard. I wouldn't want to play any other
> but a bard. So I see things from that perpective. I am not asking themto
> stop fixing everything to "... just to fix bards", I am simply askingthem
> to fix bards.And Shadowknights are asking them to fix shadowknights, Rogues are asking
> I am sure Verant and Sony are making A TON of money off this product, andquit.
> considering that, should be able to make more resources available for
> product support. Again, your right - we can either complain louder or
> I enjoy the game the way it is, so I ain't quitting. But I am a payingdifference.
> customer, so I will be complaining louder. Hopefully it makes a
> It is not being selfish to get what you paid for.You just got to lower your expectations when it comes to Verant. It's sad,