[<a href='15242.html'>Next Message in Time</a>] | 
[<a href='15240.html'>Previous Message in Time</a>] | 
[<a href='15242.html'>Next Message in Topic</a>] | 
[<a href='15239.html'>Previous Message in Topic</a>] <br/><br/>
<b>Message ID:</b> 15241 <br/>
<b>Date:</b> Tue Feb 22 16:29:49 GMT 2000 <br/>
<b>Author:</b> James Schuldes <br/>
<b>Subject:</b> RE: L46 weapon effectiveness. <br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-1536130847">Why not have both?<br/>
<br/>
Syl<br/>
<br/>
		-----Original Message-----<br/>
		From:	Peck White [mailto:<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:pwhite@...">pwhite@...</a>]<br/>
		Sent:	Tuesday, February 22, 2000 9:54 AM<br/>
		To:	&#39;<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:eqbards@onelist.com">eqbards@onelist.com</a>&#39;<br/>
		Subject:	RE: [eqbards] L46 weapon effectiveness.<br/>
<br/>
		From: Peck White &lt;<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:pwhite@...">pwhite@...</a>&gt;<br/>
<br/>
		AoE and runners are not a problem, Chains if it is.  This<br/>
way I figure I&#39;m<br/>
		giving the equivalent of a 30% haste to the entire group,<br/>
rather than a 20%<br/>
		haste to just myself.</div>