[Next Message in Time] | [Previous Message in Time] | [Next Message in Topic] | [Previous Message in Topic]

Message ID: 15264
Date: Tue Feb 22 22:20:23 GMT 2000
Author: Kimes, Dean W.
Subject: RE: New Lullaby theory


I'm 22nd level and it definitely does not work properly, nor as it once did,
for me. On even cons I get almost the same resist rate as you do John amd
against lvl 1 mobs I get a slightly worse one, probably due to being 20 CHA
points lower. I've tried using it on 3 blue gnoll reavers and I couldn't
keep them asleep long enough to not get bashed out of the song nearly
continuously.

Kit

-----Original Message-----
From: kim@... [mailto:kim@...]
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2000 3:16 PM
To: eqbards@onelist.com
Subject: [eqbards] New Lullaby theory


From: kim@...

This theory came up on the concert hall board. A bard there
claimed to have used Lullaby with great success in Runnyeye.

Anyways, my new theory is that somewhere in the resist check
when GZ should've used the mob's level, he accidently used the
bard's level. So if you (the bard) are relatively low level,
the song works reasonably well against even con mobs. But if
you are high level, the minimum resist rate is that of a high
level mob.

It has a lot of holes, but it warrants checking out. So if
you are L15-25 or so, could you try logging some of your
Lullaby episodes? If I remember, Kitasi is about the right
level for Runnyeye, no? :) You can pull out the data
yourself, or email the logfile to me and I'll do it.

--
John H. Kim
kim@...



------------------------------------------------------------------------
GET A NEXTCARD VISA, in 30 seconds! Get rates as low as 0.0%
Intro or 9.9% Fixed APR and no hidden fees. Apply NOW!
http://click.egroups.com/1/911/5/_/_/_/951257760/
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Please send submissions for the eqbards newsletter to lol@...
with the subject submissions.