[Next Message in Time] |
[Previous Message in Time] |
[Next Message in Topic] |
[Previous Message in Topic]
Message ID: 16113
Date: Wed Mar 15 02:22:54 GMT 2000
Author: Dave Karpman
Subject: Re: [eqbards] Kunark Expansion
>From: "Kenneth E. Bachman" <kbachman@...>Dave Karpman davek@...
>
>Yeah, as I said in my last message, this is just what some members of my
>guild are arguing for Dragon
>raids. No Bards. And even with six bards in the guild level 45 and up,
>we're having a hard time arguing
>the point. We're *supposed* to be the most powerful *grouping* class in
>the game, but our songs have been
>nerfed to the point where, even in a *full* group, someone else does it
>better. Have you seen the
>discussions on other boards where people are asked to list their ideal
>parties, or the player type they
>would choose to group with first? If we're the best grouping class, we
>should be way up on those lists,
>shouldn't we? Instead, most people out there don't even put bards down as
>an alternate for the sixth
>slot! I'm getting a complex.
>
>Kenross Cantoforjado, 45.8 songs, Innoruuk
>
>
>Ryan Honeyman wrote:
>
> > I don't feel we are keeping balanced with other classes, but
> > until we claim that - Verant will not see a problem. Everquest is
> > turning toward a cleric + warrior game, strategies/abilities/spells or
> > songs are really not meaningful in that scenario. When a group of
> > people hunting gods, dragons, etc can say 'We really don't need a bard
> > for this.', 'We need better tanks, and better healing, bards will just
> > lag us.', 'I would rather have a warrior with decent gear instead of a
> > bard.' - something is seriously wrong balance-wise.
>
>
>----------
>Please send submissions for the eqbards newsletter to lol@...
>with the subject submissions.