[Next Message in Time] | [Previous Message in Time] | [Next Message in Topic] | [Previous Message in Topic]

Message ID: 16548
Date: Tue Mar 21 18:39:19 GMT 2000
Author: Lonnie Lewis
Subject: RE: [eqbards] Clouding vs. Undead


But you could make the argument the other way as well. If you can walk
unmolested through Unrest with clouding, then it is invis vs. undead.

Of course there are exceptions to both (GIBS vs. cleric invis, barbed and
lvl 5 skellies vs. bard invis)

Bien


> From: jhenders@...
>
> On Tue, Mar 21/00, firehawk@... wrote:
> > From: firehawk@...
> >
> > Actually I could go back and get my e-mail from the last great clouding
> debate where I did exactly that test the con and the result with invis on
> and invis off. What I tend to think people forget is the possibilty of
> see invis being part of some of these creatures.
> >
>
> It really seems to be semantics at this point. Ultimately, if you can
> run to the ghoul lord room unmolested with the cleric/enchanter invis to
> undead, but not with the bard song, then clouding is not really invis to
> undead.
>
> --
> Artificial Intelligence stands no chance against Natural Stupidity.
> GAT d- -p+(--) c++++ l++ u++ t- m--- W--- !v
> b+++ e* s-/+ n-(?) h++ f+g+ w+++ y*
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> MAXIMIZE YOUR CARD, MINIMIZE YOUR RATE!
> Get a NextCard Visa, in 30 seconds! Get rates as low as
> 0.0% Intro or 9.9% Fixed APR and no hidden fees.
> Apply NOW!
> http://click.egroups.com/1/2122/7/_/451022/_/953664291/
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Please send submissions for the eqbards newsletter to lol@...
> with the subject submissions.