[Next Message in Time] |
[Previous Message in Time] |
[Next Message in Topic] |
[Previous Message in Topic]
Message ID: 16553
Date: Tue Mar 21 18:57:57 GMT 2000
Author: Jeff Illian
Subject: Re: [eqbards] Chains
> So you're basically having the bard waste an extra song slotYes, in your fantastic analysis of my song line up, I suppose that is
> (still need Chain in case something goes wrong with snare)
> because the ranger/druid is too lazy to wait for you to give
> the "Chain off" message?
>
> 100% deferral to snare is not the optimal solution.
> But don't you see, that very same argument works against snareYou are out of context here. The nuke-DOT comment has nothing to do with
> just as well as chain. If all it takes to deal with a runner
> is a nuke and a DoT, then it doesn't matter if you overwrite
> snare with chain.
> On the one hand, you claim you almost never use chain,Credibility MY ASS! You really think I always have a druid or ranger in the
> deferring to druid/ranger snarers and shaman/enchanter speed
> debuffers. On the other hand, you speak as if with expertise
> about how reliable chain is against high level mobs. Do you
> see the credibility problem here?
> And I've had it wear off immediately from a L2 beetle. ItI'd like to see a log analysis here. In my experience its more liek 40% to
> happens from time to time. 95% of the time in my experience,
> it works fine.
> Try the live side. Most people avoid the maze and noble/kingLive side on Prexus is just as camped as the dead side... Got about as much
> area for some reason (probably so set into the camp mentality
> that having to run around confusing corridors is terrifying
> for them).