I think the best solution to this is to allow all hybrids and warriors to
be bound to any place by a caster. It still maintains the necessity for
non-casters to be bound by casters and allows for some flexibility for the
non-casters. I personally hate dying defending a caster only to run
through 5 or 6 zones to retrieve my corpse. We really don't need bind.

Treilanin - Bard of Kelethin - Karana

On Wed, 9 Jun 1999, John Kim wrote:

> From: John Kim <kim@...>
>
> On Wed, 9 Jun 1999, Sean Kennedy wrote:
> >
> > I also don't think we should get bind any more than rangers, paladins
> > or sk's. I actually saw a post stating that monks should have bind
> > at high levels, some idea that a high level monk was so in touch with
> > his chi that he could bind it to a spot :)
> >
> > Bind should stay the purview of the pure casters, as should gate.
>
> Given that we can innately move so much faster than any of the
> other hybrids, I think we have even less reason to ask for
> bind than the other hybrids.
> --
> John H. Kim
> kim@...
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Having difficulty getting "in synch" with list members?
> http://www.onelist.com
> Try ONElist's Shared Calendar to organize events, meetings and more!
>