this idea was potsed to the message board that fostered the birth of the
bardic petition.
why not allow bards to bind, but restrict it to themselves in taverns or
inns. Also possibly using a bottle of ale or wine as a reagent.
Penaden Songweaver
http://www.lostorder.com

Abraham Hardjana wrote:

> From: Abraham Hardjana <ahardjan@...>
>
> I think the best solution to this is to allow all hybrids and warriors to
> be bound to any place by a caster. It still maintains the necessity for
> non-casters to be bound by casters and allows for some flexibility for the
> non-casters. I personally hate dying defending a caster only to run
> through 5 or 6 zones to retrieve my corpse. We really don't need bind.
>
> Treilanin - Bard of Kelethin - Karana
>
> On Wed, 9 Jun 1999, John Kim wrote:
>
> > From: John Kim <kim@...>
> >
> > On Wed, 9 Jun 1999, Sean Kennedy wrote:
> > >
> > > I also don't think we should get bind any more than rangers, paladins
> > > or sk's. I actually saw a post stating that monks should have bind
> > > at high levels, some idea that a high level monk was so in touch with
> > > his chi that he could bind it to a spot :)
> > >
> > > Bind should stay the purview of the pure casters, as should gate.
> >
> > Given that we can innately move so much faster than any of the
> > other hybrids, I think we have even less reason to ask for
> > bind than the other hybrids.
> > --
> > John H. Kim
> > kim@...
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Having difficulty getting "in synch" with list members?
> > http://www.onelist.com
> > Try ONElist's Shared Calendar to organize events, meetings and more!
> >
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ONElist members are using Shared Files in great ways!
> http://www.onelist.com
> Are you? If not, see our homepage for details.