[Next Message in Time] | [Previous Message in Time] | [Next Message in Topic] | [Previous Message in Topic]

Message ID: 1697
Date: Wed Jun 9 21:10:14 BST 1999
Author: Abraham Hardjana
Subject: Re: Petition and general opinions


But this does not solve the biggest reason why most people want to be able
to bind. The inability to bind near the zone you are hunting makes
adventuring very difficult. Now the inn idea is better, but some zones
have no inns between you and the nearest city zone. The next thing is
there seems to be no way to consider a part of zone as a place to bind. Or
else the area around Kelethin would have been binding spot instead of the
whole G Fay zone. You'll notice that places where you can bind
non-casters are strictly city zones or else the zone allows you to bind
ala G Fay. So, for the sake of roleplaying this is a cool idea, but it
will not improve our situation in EQ much.

Treilanin - Bard of Kelethin - Karana

On Wed, 9 Jun 1999, Brandon Kassebaum wrote:

> From: Brandon Kassebaum <kassebaum@...>
>
> this idea was potsed to the message board that fostered the birth of the
> bardic petition.
> why not allow bards to bind, but restrict it to themselves in taverns or
> inns. Also possibly using a bottle of ale or wine as a reagent.
> Penaden Songweaver
> http://www.lostorder.com
>
> Abraham Hardjana wrote:
>
> > From: Abraham Hardjana <ahardjan@...>
> >
> > I think the best solution to this is to allow all hybrids and warriors to
> > be bound to any place by a caster. It still maintains the necessity for
> > non-casters to be bound by casters and allows for some flexibility for the
> > non-casters. I personally hate dying defending a caster only to run
> > through 5 or 6 zones to retrieve my corpse. We really don't need bind.
> >
> > Treilanin - Bard of Kelethin - Karana
> >
> > On Wed, 9 Jun 1999, John Kim wrote:
> >
> > > From: John Kim <kim@...>
> > >
> > > On Wed, 9 Jun 1999, Sean Kennedy wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I also don't think we should get bind any more than rangers, paladins
> > > > or sk's. I actually saw a post stating that monks should have bind
> > > > at high levels, some idea that a high level monk was so in touch with
> > > > his chi that he could bind it to a spot :)
> > > >
> > > > Bind should stay the purview of the pure casters, as should gate.
> > >
> > > Given that we can innately move so much faster than any of the
> > > other hybrids, I think we have even less reason to ask for
> > > bind than the other hybrids.
> > > --
> > > John H. Kim
> > > kim@...
> > >
> > >
> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > Having difficulty getting "in synch" with list members?
> > > http://www.onelist.com
> > > Try ONElist's Shared Calendar to organize events, meetings and more!
> > >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > ONElist members are using Shared Files in great ways!
> > http://www.onelist.com
> > Are you? If not, see our homepage for details.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> What do lizards and rock music have in common?
> http://www.onelist.com
> They both have communities at ONElist. Find yours today!
>