[Next Message in Time] |
[Previous Message in Time] |
[Next Message in Topic] |
[Previous Message in Topic]
Message ID: 17228
Date: Sat Apr 1 16:42:39 BST 2000
Author: jay schultze
Subject: Re: [eqbards] Waki or Yaki... Was Claw Hype
>From: "Kevin L. Crawford" <Lyrnia@...>______________________________________________________
>Reply-To: eqbards@onelist.com
>To: <eqbards@onelist.com>
>Subject: Re: [eqbards] Waki or Yaki... Was Claw Hype
>Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 12:11:25 -0500
>
>Sar I dunno about Bards, I've never bothered with Yaks myself ;) But as a
>Ranger I can guarantee that a Y'kesha vastly out damages a wakizashi.
>Rangers have done a lot of testing of log files, combat durations, solo
>fights, what they can and cannot kill with the various weapons etc.
>
>I'm not going to re-hash those discussions here but suffice to say the
>Y'kesha, every time, out dammaged the Wakizashi by enough that we all
>agreed
>that we were better off with a Y'kesha over a Wakizashi. The Wakizashi's
>dmg output is not significant enough during a fight to out-dmg a y'kesha
>once the Y'kesha procs. Remember, Rangers have Dual Wield AND Double
>Attack, so they tend to proc more often than us when using them. My Ranger
>proc's between 3 and 5 times a fight. So 3*70 or 5*70 additional dmg.
>Many
>rangers average higher (My ranger's dex is horrible (<80)) and I still
>regularly proc 5 times a fight. A ranger with 100 dex will *regularly*
>proc
>between 4 and 7 times a fight. Sometimes more.
>
>Ciao! As I said the rangers discussed it. The numbers may be different
>for
>Bards since we don't have Double Attack or the Rangers THAC0 table and thus
>hit a LOT less often. But I suspect people will find that the Y'kesha will
>still edge the Waki's out in dmg. Though not by nearly as much as it did
>for rangers.
>
>Hope this clears up my post ;)