i think he meant who are bards to tell a rogue 1hs is worthless to them.
(and it wasn't preferential, it was a lotto from what i read. the bard in
the group just felt rogues shouldn't get it) tho i could be wrong
-----Original Message-----
From:
kim@... [mailto:
kim@...]
Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2000 1:26 PM
To:
eqbards@egroups.com
Subject: Re: [eqbards] who are we?
On Wed, 5 Apr 2000, Bill Costlow wrote:
> --- kim@... wrote:
>
> > That's another thing to consider. If you're going
> > to base it
> > on who will get the best use out of it, are you
> > basing it on
> > raw numerical improvement, or percentage
> > improvement?
>
> I understand the discomfort here...and I am NOT
> lashing out at anyone, but:
>
> *** who are we to tell someone else how to build their
> character? ***
???
The person asked for reasons why a rogue shouldn't get
preferential treatment for an EBW. I gave a bunch of points
shooting holes in the "a rogue can use it better than a bard"
argument.