[Next Message in Time] | [Previous Message in Time] | [Next Message in Topic] | [Previous Message in Topic]

Message ID: 17456
Date: Thu Apr 6 19:03:51 BST 2000
Author: Bill Costlow
Subject: Re: [eqbards] who are we?


Hi John,

I appologise if you thought I was attacking your post.
I was simply stating my opinion:

"Any group member should be allowed to participate in
any lotto the group holds."

Somebody smarter than me used Baldur's Gate as an
example. Wish I'd have thought of that---made the
point much better than I did.

Certainly none of us care to have our group members
tell us that bards don't need, for example, an FBSS
because we have songs to speed us up.

Certainly a rogue would not appreciate someone else
telling him/her what weapon to use...regardless of
statistics or other rationale.

Again, sorry if you thought I was attacking your post.
For that matter, I meant no offense to anybody, just
expressing an opinion.

Tyunes of Rodcet Nife
The different drummer



--- kim@... wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Apr 2000, Bill Costlow wrote:
> > --- kim@... wrote:
> >
> > > That's another thing to consider. If you're
> going
> > > to base it
> > > on who will get the best use out of it, are you
> > > basing it on
> > > raw numerical improvement, or percentage
> > > improvement?
> >
> > I understand the discomfort here...and I am NOT
> > lashing out at anyone, but:
> >
> > *** who are we to tell someone else how to build
> their
> > character? ***
>
> ???
>
> The person asked for reasons why a rogue shouldn't
> get
> preferential treatment for an EBW. I gave a bunch
> of points
> shooting holes in the "a rogue can use it better
> than a bard"
> argument.
>
> --
> John H. Kim
> kim@...
>
>

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com