[Next Message in Time] |
[Previous Message in Time] |
[Next Message in Topic] |
[Previous Message in Topic]
Message ID: 17456
Date: Thu Apr 6 19:03:51 BST 2000
Author: Bill Costlow
Subject: Re: [eqbards] who are we?
> On Wed, 5 Apr 2000, Bill Costlow wrote:__________________________________________________
> > --- kim@... wrote:
> >
> > > That's another thing to consider. If you're
> going
> > > to base it
> > > on who will get the best use out of it, are you
> > > basing it on
> > > raw numerical improvement, or percentage
> > > improvement?
> >
> > I understand the discomfort here...and I am NOT
> > lashing out at anyone, but:
> >
> > *** who are we to tell someone else how to build
> their
> > character? ***
>
> ???
>
> The person asked for reasons why a rogue shouldn't
> get
> preferential treatment for an EBW. I gave a bunch
> of points
> shooting holes in the "a rogue can use it better
> than a bard"
> argument.
>
> --
> John H. Kim
> kim@...
>
>