[Next Message in Time] |
[Previous Message in Time] |
[Next Message in Topic] |
[Previous Message in Topic]
Message ID: 1854
Date: Sat Jun 12 08:47:06 BST 1999
Author: Talies the Wanderer
Subject: Re: Song Scripts
>Imagine if something like this is instituted.. performing a song wouldI'm actually in favour of delays in scripts, notice the anti-spam thoughts
>take no time at all..you hit your /script macro, and then you're done..
>5 seconds.. consider this announcement..
>Soerbaird Concert, this sunday!Take it from the winner of the First Bardic Competition on Elanthia - it's
>Starts: 5pm
>there will be 9 singers!
>After the concert we will meet at an inn for drinks!
>(Figure 5:15 at the latest)
>Be there!
>It just doesn't seem as real. A good decent length song (with a fastAgain, I feel that adding a mandatory pause based on line length (minimum 3
>typist) takes about as long to type as it does to sing in RL (once you
>figure in pauses for musical solos and such).. a five minute RL song
>would take about that much time (give or take) to do in EQ. I like
>this, and a script command would just resort concerts to the following..
>It just seems so impersonal. *shrugs* just my opinion, take it as youI know that EQ is different from the text-based muds we all want to
>will, I've rambled enough.
>I like the manual imput for a few reasons. But mostly for the("Imput" he says - I wonder if that was intentional?)
>atmosphere. It doesn't seem very personal when someone just spams out a
>song 10 lines at a time. I've always loved the time it takes to type
>out each line.. it adds suspence to the story.. (or song).