[Next Message in Time] | [Previous Message in Time] | [Next Message in Topic] | [Previous Message in Topic]

Message ID: 18860
Date: Fri May 19 22:02:39 BST 2000
Author: kevikazzam@aol.com
Subject: Re: [eqbards] Re: AC


Hmm , i am too lazy to look at what stats are for sure , but here is an
approx list ands i have something like 837 - 840 ac ,,,, i think

Head : imbrued helm (AC - 16) and stats
neck : polished mithril torque (AC - 7) wis / int
face: guise of the deciver (AC - 4 ) i think
ears: opalline earrings ( AC - 2)x2 +5 ,cha each

rings: plat fire opal rings ( ac 5 )x2, +55hp
wrist1 : imbrued bracer ( ac 9 ) stats
wrist2 : hero bracer ( AC 9 ) stats
arms : imbrued arms ( ac 16... i think ) stats
shoulder : carnal pauldrons ( ac - 9 ) dex , wis
chest : imbrued BP ( ac 29 ) stats
legs : blackend iron ( ac 6 ) the gold and blue look like crap and i guess
i'm a fashion junkie.
back : cloak of shadow ( ac 12 ) dex
boots : imbrued boots ( ac 16 ) stats
waist : troll hide ( ac 5 ) but i want a TBB
primary - 6NB 11 / 25
secondary - martune rapier 8 / 23
ranged - kerran toy ( ac 3 ) agi / runed bone fork

all that added up gives me like i said about 837 ac if i recall , but that
could be if i put my lambent greaves on , and i wish i had imbrued ones but
hate seems kinda dull now that kunark is open.
As a side note , here is one of my personal little superstitions about
armor. I always believed that when you put together a suit of armor, its kind
of like a circuit, i could always swear that when i got all my bronze armor
at 25 i would take a ton less damage then when i was only missing one piece,
same with my lambent, i never tested it, but thats always just the way it
seemed. so while i take less damage with my high ac , i still wonder if i
would take even less damage if i had imbrued legs.
but who knows. anyone else noticed this? , or should i go out and rent my
padded cell now ?

Ulaien Firesong < == nuts
lvl 51 bard of tunare