[Next Message in Time] | [Previous Message in Time] | [Next Message in Topic] | [Previous Message in Topic]

Message ID: 19034
Date: Sat May 27 05:22:14 BST 2000
Author: Danny Craigg
Subject: Re: [eqbards] Digest Number 963


>Thanks for mentioning this guys for the clueless netizens out there that
are
>newbies to netiquette (god I hate buzzwords, hehe).

I thought the same netiquette pretty much spoke against flames? Rarely is
there anything in a flame that is of much more importance than the topic
that was flamed. Kinda like this message :).

Raiel