[Next Message in Time] |
[Previous Message in Time] |
[Next Message in Topic] |
[Previous Message in Topic]
Message ID: 19035
Date: Sat May 27 05:43:06 BST 2000
Author: jay schultze
Subject: Re: [eqbards] Digest Number 963
>From: "Danny Craigg" <danny@...>________________________________________________________________________
>Reply-To: eqbards@egroups.com
>To: <eqbards@egroups.com>
>Subject: Re: [eqbards] Digest Number 963
>Date: Sat, 27 May 2000 00:22:14 -0400
>
>I thought the same netiquette pretty much spoke against flames? Rarely is
>there anything in a flame that is of much more importance than the topic
>that was flamed. Kinda like this message :).
>
>Raiel
>
>