[Next Message in Time] | [Previous Message in Time] | [Next Message in Topic] | [Previous Message in Topic]

Message ID: 20155
Date: Thu Jun 29 17:57:26 BST 2000
Author: Kimes, Dean W.
Subject: RE: [eqbards] The true history of Lullaby, it's problems, it's if xes and it's nerfs


> > Lullaby with just a Lute would be just as useless as it is now. It
would
>be
> > cool for saving newbies from a train in Blackburrow, but pointless in
>normal
> > combat situations. Unless you want to just stand there and play just
> > Lullaby while the rest of the group actually fights. That's why my
> > enchanter is just gathering dust, I found I don;t want to just stand
(err
> > sit) there and Mez until someone needs Quickness or Breeze refreshed.

>umm, it would be pointless in normal combat situations? why? cuz you can't
>swing weapons? maybe you *would* be more suited for the role of a real
tank
>instead of a bard.

Wow, your turn to be cranky I guess. Oh well, we're all entitled. Nah it
isn't that I couldn't swing weapons really. It's that if I am Lullabying
with a Lute I literally cannot do anything else until Lullaby is no longer
needed. I may as well walk off and get a sandwich. At least if I could
swing my weapons I be doing something other than just watching the screen
waiting till we were down to one mob. Now if Lullaby required a Lute and
lasted two ticks I'd be ecstatic about the change. Then I could argue with
all my elist friends over what song was best to twist in between rounds of
Lullaby. ;-)

Kitasi