[Next Message in Time] | [Previous Message in Time] | [Next Message in Topic] | [Previous Message in Topic]

Message ID: 22063
Date: Wed Oct 18 01:11:55 BST 2000
Author: jhenders@bogon.com
Subject: Re: [eqbards] Wooho Absor's a Bard!! Absor's a Bard!! Absor's a Bard!!! *does a little dance*


Well, I guess as it was his editorial, purporting to investigate bard's
complaints about lullaby, that I found his lighthearted brush off of it
actually being a problem for bards to be a bit annoying.

On Tue, Oct 17/00, John Tatsukawa <john@...> wrote:
> Well that's not entirely fair. He states that his own test is inconclusive:
> So, what have I to conclude from my testing?
> Not a thing.
>
> His quote about being a happy bard is simply stating that he enjoyed a
> bard's versatility and usefulness. He never really bring's up John Kim's
> statistics that I see. He does talk about some "debate about Bards and
> their Lullaby".
>
> Just based on this one article, he doesn't really sound like a very serious
> bard.
>
> ---Windleaf Mistsong
> No longer a member of the falling apart Clan Battlehammer on Bertox :(
>
> At 04:26 PM 10/17/00 -0700, jhenders@... wrote:
>
> >Worse than that, for the whole playerbase, IMO, was his willingness to
> >completely throw out the detailed study John Kim had posted (article
> >comments indicate that was the thread he had been reading) and instead
> >rely on his very brief experience with the song before he got distracted
> >helping a player find his corpse. Then he announces he's perfectly happy
> >with the song, as if that negates anyone else's concerns. This seems
> >little different than Abashi's attitude.
> >
> >On Tue, Oct 17/00, "Cyr, Thierry" <thierry.cyr@...> wrote:
> > > doh, i was hoping he was at least a few levels higher *sigh*
> > >
> > >
> > > Hmm. Check out his other article here. A little less encouraging, I'd
> > > say.
> > >
> > > http://eqx.simplenet.com/Issue140/edita.htm
> > >
> > > On Tue, Oct 17/00, "Cyr, Thierry" <thierry.cyr@...> wrote:
> > > > http://www.eqx.simplenet.com/Issue50/musings.htm
> >
> >--
> > Artificial Intelligence stands no chance against Natural Stupidity.
> > GAT d- -p+(--) c++++ l++ u++ t- m--- W--- !v
> > b+++ e* s-/+ n-(?) h++ f+g+ w+++ y*
> >
> >
> >
> >Please send submissions for the eqbards newsletter to lol@...
> >with the subject submissions.
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> Please send submissions for the eqbards newsletter to lol@... with the subject submissions.
>
>

--
Artificial Intelligence stands no chance against Natural Stupidity.
GAT d- -p+(--) c++++ l++ u++ t- m--- W--- !v
b+++ e* s-/+ n-(?) h++ f+g+ w+++ y*