Aye, it was very fluffy and I don't consider it really an article but more
of a rambling. Why in the world would anyone even consider this an
"editorial"? More of a journal entry of "My day in Norrath". :-P
At 05:11 PM 10/17/00 -0700, you wrote:
>Well, I guess as it was his editorial, purporting to investigate bard's
>complaints about lullaby, that I found his lighthearted brush off of it
>actually being a problem for bards to be a bit annoying.
>
>On Tue, Oct 17/00, John Tatsukawa <john@...> wrote:
> > Well that's not entirely fair. He states that his own test is inconclusive:
> > So, what have I to conclude from my testing?
> > Not a thing.
> >
> > His quote about being a happy bard is simply stating that he enjoyed a
> > bard's versatility and usefulness. He never really bring's up John Kim's
> > statistics that I see. He does talk about some "debate about Bards and
> > their Lullaby".
> >
> > Just based on this one article, he doesn't really sound like a very
> serious
> > bard.
> >
> > ---Windleaf Mistsong
> > No longer a member of the falling apart Clan Battlehammer on Bertox :(
> >
> > At 04:26 PM 10/17/00 -0700, jhenders@... wrote:
> >
> > >Worse than that, for the whole playerbase, IMO, was his willingness to
> > >completely throw out the detailed study John Kim had posted (article
> > >comments indicate that was the thread he had been reading) and instead
> > >rely on his very brief experience with the song before he got distracted
> > >helping a player find his corpse. Then he announces he's perfectly happy
> > >with the song, as if that negates anyone else's concerns. This seems
> > >little different than Abashi's attitude.
> > >
> > >On Tue, Oct 17/00, "Cyr, Thierry" <thierry.cyr@...> wrote:
> > > > doh, i was hoping he was at least a few levels higher *sigh*
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hmm. Check out his other article here. A little less encouraging, I'd
> > > > say.
> > > >
> > > > http://eqx.simplenet.com/Issue140/edita.htm
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Oct 17/00, "Cyr, Thierry" <thierry.cyr@...> wrote:
> > > > > http://www.eqx.simplenet.com/Issue50/musings.htm
> > >
> > >--
> > > Artificial Intelligence stands no chance against Natural Stupidity.
> > > GAT d- -p+(--) c++++ l++ u++ t- m--- W--- !v
> > > b+++ e* s-/+ n-(?) h++ f+g+ w+++ y*
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >Please send submissions for the eqbards newsletter to lol@...
> > >with the subject submissions.
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
> > Please send submissions for the eqbards newsletter to
> lol@... with the subject submissions.
> >
> >
>
>--
> Artificial Intelligence stands no chance against Natural Stupidity.
> GAT d- -p+(--) c++++ l++ u++ t- m--- W--- !v
> b+++ e* s-/+ n-(?) h++ f+g+ w+++ y*
>
>
>
>Please send submissions for the eqbards newsletter to lol@...
>with the subject submissions.