[Next Message in Time] | [Previous Message in Time] | [Next Message in Topic] | [Previous Message in Topic]

Message ID: 22998
Date: Thu Jan 11 20:06:03 GMT 2001
Author: Kimes, Dean W.
Subject: RE: [eqbards] Proposal to change how bard haste songs stack with enchanter/sham an haste spells


Awesome! I didn't know about that option. I'll start recording stats
during prime-time and see what shakes out. I was concerned that off-peak
hours might skew numbers towards more soloable classes, until I saw how many
enchanters there were :-o

I've never met anyone who could solo an enchanter after 20th level.

Kit

-----Original Message-----
From: Daniel P. Sniderman [mailto:fuzzbone@...]
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2001 12:44 PM
To: eqbards@egroups.com
Subject: RE: [eqbards] Proposal to change how bard haste songs stack
with enchanter/sham an haste spells


Kit - you forgot you can do a "/who warrior all count" and get just the
count - without worrying about the list cutoff. You can do this during
primetime and get better statistics.

Slyde

-----Original Message-----
From: Kimes, Dean W. [mailto:dean_kimes@...]
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2001 1:22 PM
To: 'eqbards@egroups.com'
Subject: RE: [eqbards] Proposal to change how bard haste songs stack with
enchanter/sham an haste spells


Warriors 32+ too many to list
Rogues 9.5
Monks 5.5
Rangers 30
Paladins 27
Shadowknights 17.5
Bards 5
Wizards 19.25
Magicians 29.75
Necromancers 32+ too many to list
Enchanters 25+ One night there were too many to
list
Clerics 31+ Two nights there were too many to list
Druids 32+ too many to list
Shamans 23.75

With over 600 people on the server this means that either half the
server was Anonymous or Roleplaying (Highly unlikely) or those classes
which were too many to list were actually much, much higher than 32 in
number.


Kitasi



Please send submissions for the eqbards newsletter to lol@...
with the subject submissions.