[Next Message in Time] | [Previous Message in Time] | [Next Message in Topic] | [Previous Message in Topic]

Message ID: 23996
Date: Mon Feb 26 21:23:31 GMT 2001
Author: Kimes, Dean W.
Subject: RE: [eqbards] Re: Bard% was (Patch message)


Right so those other 19 people will not be inconvenienced then by any bard
change apparently. So they also shouldn't object to bard issues being
fixed. Cause if you start to actually say "Should we spend time on fixing
bard issues?" you're right back at having those 14 segments again because
every one of them will want "their" issues fixed.

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeffrey Sue [mailto:jsue@...]
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2001 2:38 PM
To: eqbards@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [eqbards] Re: Bard% was (Patch message)



>Bard:Wizard 1:2
>PVP:PVE 1:13

People who care about bard issues : People who don't know or don't care
about bard issues 1:20

if you'd like to argue that number, go ask 10 random people of various
classes ''What are bard
balance issues and what do you think about them?'' and tally up the answers
you get. And
obviously I don't mean to poll your personal selection of friends whom
you've talked to a lot about
these issues, heh.



Please send submissions for the eqbards newsletter to lol@...
with the subject submissions.

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/