[Next Message in Time] |
[Previous Message in Time] |
[Next Message in Topic] |
[Previous Message in Topic]
Message ID: 24144
Date: Thu Mar 1 01:04:53 GMT 2001
Author: Jeffrey Sue
Subject: RE: [eqbards] Whats the arguement?
>reply:well never having a resist problem doesn't mean i have no resists, just that the
>
> > well it started out by someone saying dirge was useless due
> > to recast time and
> > resists. i said what resist problem, i never have any, and
> > it is useful in some
> > situations including pvp.
>
>never huh? i will go with some nevers too. i have never had this land on
>an uber mob. i have never had this land on a character i am dueling who is
>equal or higher level than me and has any sense to put some MR gear on. and
>i will never have this memmed if i am exp'ing or raiding.
> > i pointed out 2 good ways towell, for those people who complain that they are useless when grouped with an
> > get quite a bit of damage
> > out of this song (one of which was in an enchanter group,
> > where many people think
> > they are useless). the song has been compared to harm touch,
> > and i think it compares
> > favorably to harmtouch with respect to damage/refresh time.
>
>you call good damage 0.20 damage/second? and that's being conservative,
>it's actually less. you pointed out ways you can use the song, they are not
>good ways they are just ways you used to point out to people that you do not
>think it is useless. harm touch doesn't take a spell slot, and does a lot
>more damage and is resisted far less with it's recent changes and i think a
>new SK discipline, and DDD is a waste of a song slot.
> > i almost never solo.how many other classes are not extremely unimportant on raids? clerics, warriors,
>
>i am guessing you almost never go up against uber mobs in SoV or even Kunark
>either. you would not think bards are overpowered. i think we kick ass in
>an exp group, but i don't think that means we need to be extremely
>unimportant on raids.
>Shada