[Next Message in Time] | [Previous Message in Time] | [Next Message in Topic] | [Previous Message in Topic]

Message ID: 24161
Date: Thu Mar 1 18:58:06 GMT 2001
Author: Jeffrey Sue
Subject: RE: [eqbards] Whats the arguement?


At 01:08 PM 3/1/01 -0500, you wrote:
>HT takes twice as long to recast than dirge does, IF you sit on your ass
>every second you can, which you won't be. either way, it's funny we are
>debating whether a song that does less than 0.20 damage per second is useful
>or not. i know you like to argue Whee, but... oh well i won't ever mem it,
>do as you please.

i believe someone said the 40 minute recast was standing, not sitting. perhaps
i misread something.

my first point was that 0.20 damage per second is worst case, and secondly, if you thought
DDD was useless (which it may be in most situations, although for those folks who
always complain they have nothing to do in enchanter groups, this seems like something
that might be worthwhile) that you must also think HT is useless.

>Shada