[Next Message in Time] |
[Previous Message in Time] |
[Next Message in Topic] |
[Previous Message in Topic]
Message ID: 24162
Date: Thu Mar 1 18:48:10 GMT 2001
Author: Garramone, Michael (CCI-Las Vegas)
Subject: RE: [eqbards] Whats the arguement?
> ok, except that every shaman after the first is unnecessaryi knew i forgot someone hehe, i guess druids can go in the middle for their
> and every paladin after the
> first and those under lvl 60 are unnecessary. is necro mana
> pump really necessary? who pumps
> the necros? their pet damage is easily replaced by a mage
> pet, so that alone doesn't
> make them necessary. and since you didn't even mention
> druids, i'm assuming they
> are unimportant as well, heheh.
> i didn't say they don't matter when you are in the minority.no doubt. but what are we all levelling for? it is a progression to level
> i said that you are not
> insignificant when you are in the minority. but when
> considering class balance, do
> you balance the game according to what 80% of the subscribers
> are doing or to what
> 20% or less of the subscribers are doing? it's almost
> impossible to do both because
> of all the hacks needed due to complete heal and levels post
> 50. to go off on a small
> tangent here, it seems that the game was designed as a 1 to
> 50 game, and when the
> success was so large and they decided to do an expansion and
> allow levels 50 to 60,
> they had to kludge and hack a lot of stuff together.