[Next Message in Time] | [Previous Message in Time] | [Next Message in Topic] | [Previous Message in Topic]

Message ID: 24168
Date: Thu Mar 1 19:07:41 GMT 2001
Author: Adam Wasserman
Subject: RE: [eqbards] Re: Whats the arguement?


well, if they wanted to keep the same idea, they need to...

1) Drastically reduce the mana cost or put the song on a recast timer that
is much shorter than 40 minutes.

2) Drastically increase the damage.

3) Scrap the song and start over. My dream song would be an AE stun that
used mana at a rate slightly faster than our charm song.

Draelon

-----Original Message-----
From: blitz_krieg@... [mailto:blitz_krieg@...]
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2001 1:59 PM
To: eqbards@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [eqbards] Re: Whats the arguement?


> i think Adam is right, there is always something better to do than
DDD. lemme think a sec, yes always. and if there is always something
better to do than DDD, then it is useless.
>


So, now that we all (except whee) agree it's worthless to mem, what
changes would need to be made to make it worth memming in place of
some other song?

Put it on a timer, rather than consuming mana? 10 minutes?

Increase the damage? What damage would be sufficient to make it
worth memming?

Make it DD rather than AE?

What would be the point of ever memming our 55 BBB (except maybe for
the stun effect) if DDD was made single target? Other than having 2
songs to cycle through, but who has 2 free song slots?

Darkfox


Please send submissions for the eqbards newsletter to lol@...
with the subject submissions.

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/