[Next Message in Time] |
[Previous Message in Time] |
[Next Message in Topic] |
[Previous Message in Topic]
Message ID: 24170
Date: Thu Mar 1 19:28:27 GMT 2001
Author: Jeffrey Sue
Subject: Re: [eqbards] Re: Whats the arguement?
> > i think Adam is right, there is always something better to do thanby the way, what would be the reasoning behind giving us more power with this
>DDD. lemme think a sec, yes always. and if there is always something
>better to do than DDD, then it is useless.
> >
>
>
>So, now that we all (except whee) agree it's worthless to mem, what
>changes would need to be made to make it worth memming in place of
>some other song?
>Put it on a timer, rather than consuming mana? 10 minutes?now that would make it useless to me, heh, since generally i don't have a song slot
>Increase the damage? What damage would be sufficient to make itconsidering that now you can mem it for 10 seconds whenever you want and then
>worth memming?
>Make it DD rather than AE?we already have a targetted DD song at 55 (and 12 i guess heh).
>What would be the point of ever memming our 55 BBB (except maybe forwell you answered your own previous question i guess heh.
>the stun effect) if DDD was made single target? Other than having 2
>songs to cycle through, but who has 2 free song slots?
>Darkfox