[Next Message in Time] | [Previous Message in Time] | [Next Message in Topic] | [Previous Message in Topic]

Message ID: 24170
Date: Thu Mar 1 19:28:27 GMT 2001
Author: Jeffrey Sue
Subject: Re: [eqbards] Re: Whats the arguement?


At 06:58 PM 3/1/01 +0000, you wrote:
> > i think Adam is right, there is always something better to do than
>DDD. lemme think a sec, yes always. and if there is always something
>better to do than DDD, then it is useless.
> >
>
>
>So, now that we all (except whee) agree it's worthless to mem, what
>changes would need to be made to make it worth memming in place of
>some other song?

by the way, what would be the reasoning behind giving us more power with this
song? how would it help balance the classes as a whole by giving us more damage?
shada i believe said we are already balanced or even overpowered in the non uber raid
arena. how would this not make us overpowered or overpower us even more in this
area? how would this even help us in the uber raid area since most nonlure type
damage spells are heavily resisted anyway?

>Put it on a timer, rather than consuming mana? 10 minutes?

now that would make it useless to me, heh, since generally i don't have a song slot
i can dedicate to it. however, i *can* make room for about 10 seconds every now and then.

>Increase the damage? What damage would be sufficient to make it
>worth memming?

considering that now you can mem it for 10 seconds whenever you want and then
get rid of it, i would think any damage would be nice since it's essentially free.

>Make it DD rather than AE?

we already have a targetted DD song at 55 (and 12 i guess heh).

>What would be the point of ever memming our 55 BBB (except maybe for
>the stun effect) if DDD was made single target? Other than having 2
>songs to cycle through, but who has 2 free song slots?

well you answered your own previous question i guess heh.

>Darkfox