Honestly for me its because since the release of Kunark and Velious, I've
seen our warriors and rogues outfitted in a dozen or more different weapons
each, approximately 3 sets of new armor and a dozen "uber" items while the
casters (especially int casters) sit around in jumpy and mana robes (which
in case you dont know really aren't goo). In our guild, Bards fall along
the same lines, they aren't considered "important" enough to go in on the
tank items so end up getting pretty much squat for their time and effort.
After a few months, its gets frustrating.
Halana/Tani
Solusek Ro
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Matt DeBarger [mailto:mattdeba@...]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 12:19 PM
> To: eqbards@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [eqbards] Guild Loot Rules
>
>
> I said in my example that when the warrior got the crscent
> blade, I was
> given his lammy, Of course we discovered I can't wield it,
> so it went on to
> another member. To be honest I don't think I should have
> been given the
> lammy in any case. I currently wield Sinoche's Partisan and
> Trolloch's
> Skien (10/25 5pois, procs a poison based whirl type stun, off
> hand only).
> The Lamentation is equal to the Partisan, and worth 2-3x as much. And
> certainly worth more than an off hand weapon for a class that
> doesnt melee
> all the time and doesn't get double attack.
>
> Getting warriors weapons should be a top priority of a guild.
> Warriors are
> critical for many raids, they tend to live the longest and
> need to have
> every oppurtunity to keep the mob taunted on them. Behind
> them fall in all
> the other melees, then behind that gaggle bards.
>
> Obviously everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but I
> don't understand
> why bards get upset when weapons are awarded to other classes first...
>
> Elfson
>
>
> Please send submissions for the eqbards newsletter to
> lol@... with the subject submissions.
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>