[Next Message in Time] |
[Previous Message in Time] |
[Next Message in Topic] |
[Previous Message in Topic]
Message ID: 3014
Date: Wed Jul 7 19:09:55 BST 1999
Author: Fun Bob
Subject: Re: Twisting and connections
>From: chlebek@...but
>
>
>
>
>> So if it really is time for a new ISP any suggestions out there?
>> Who is good, since mine is obviously far worse than I thought.
>
>I would suggest AT&T Worldnet as a good choice. I used to use Earthlink,
>they go the whole way thru UUnet and with the troubles that UUnet seems tostill
>have occasionally I would suggest staying away from any ISP that leasestheir
>bandwidth from UUnet.you
>
>AT&T Worldnet goes thru a combination of AT&T's own lines and Cerfnet. If
>are on one of the servers that is on the Cerfnet backbone (as I am) this isa
>great way to go. Ping times are in the 175 to 240 range and I almost alwayshave
>0 0 packet loss. And did you ever notice that when UUnet was having fitsthat
>there were still a couple hundred people on the servers? THEY weren't goingthru
>UUnet. :-)the
>
>If you call the various ISP's in your area you might be able to give the
>address of your server and ask them to do a traceroute to see whatbackbone(s)
>it goes thru. Dunno how receptive they'd be buy you could try.
>
>Just my humble opinions,
>Taelin
>
>
>
>--------------------------- ONElist Sponsor ----------------------------
>
>Attention ONElist list owners!
>http://www.onelist.com/info/news.html
>Check out the new "DEFAULT MODERATED STATUS" option.
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>