[Next Message in Time] | [Previous Message in Time] | [Next Message in Topic] | [Previous Message in Topic]

Message ID: 3471
Date: Tue Jul 13 22:51:24 BST 1999
Author: scott@xxxxxxxxx.xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Subject: Re: Bards and Binding


What I would like to see is an NPC that could bind for a fee, and limit
class based binding to one of a few classes. The advantage that the class/es
would have is the ability to bind themselves away from a city, which is a
nice limit for the NPC's. Make sense to me if you want to foster a sense of
being able to explore the world safely.




----- Original Message -----
From: Keith G. Spencer <kgs@...>
To: <eqbards@onelist.com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 1999 2:35 PM
Subject: Re: [eqbards] Bards and Binding


> From: "Keith G. Spencer" <kgs@...>
>
> I've got to concur.
>
> There's already WAY too much skill overlap IMHO. Actually it annoys me
that
> ALL the casters get bind, then on top of that it annoys me that casters
can
> bind anywhere, where as noncasters can only bind in cities.
>
> The best happy medium I can think of is allow anyone to bind at Inns &
> Taverns, but still only casters can cast bind. Also, take away the bind
> anywhere ability of the casters (forcing them to bind at the inns as
well).
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dan Harmon <deharmon@...>
> To: eqbards@onelist.com <eqbards@onelist.com>
> Date: Tuesday, July 13, 1999 5:19 PM
> Subject: Re: [eqbards] Bards and Binding
>
>
> >From: "Dan Harmon" <deharmon@...>
> >
> >I don't know, if I thought about it I'm sure I could come up with some
> >perfectly reasonable argument that my magician should get SoW at lvl
> >5...just for himself. But he never does. And it sucks. My bard never
> gets
> >bind. That sucks, too. But I'd rather they never got each other's
> >abilities.
> >
> >
> >> From: "Kimes, Dean W." <Dean_Kimes@...>
> >>
> >> Hate to bring this up again, but we Bards seem more like the
semi-caster
> >> shamans and clerics than the Paladins and Shadowknights. I don't see
why
> >we
> >> shouldn't have bind as a result, probably only on ourselves though. It
> >> could replace the leel 14 song nicely, unless they plan on making that
> one
> >> worth buying.
> >
> >
> >
> >--------------------------- ONElist Sponsor ----------------------------
> >
> >Congratulations MilitaryEFM. Our latest ONElist of the week.
> >http://www.onelist.com
> >How is ONElist changing YOUR life? Visit our homepage and let us know!
> >
> >------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
>
>
> --------------------------- ONElist Sponsor ----------------------------
>
> Attention ONElist list owners!
> http://www.onelist.com/info/news.html
> Check out the new "DEFAULT MODERATED STATUS" option.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>