But that's just it, I like having a dungeon with 10 people in it if I'm willing
to travel far from my bind point. I don't want "half of the people in
BlackBurrow" to be there. However I agree that it can be tedious to find someone
to bind during off hours. To fix that, we need to push for the idea that many
people have had which is to have NPC's that can bind you for a fee available at
temples (or where ever). This still keeps bind points in cities (giving the
reward for traveling) but also allows people that play at off hours to be able
to get bound without waiting hours for some kind soul to show up.

Taelin, Songweavers of Kelethin

> No I think you'd find people of more appropriate level there, and half the
> people in BlackBurrow would be there too since there are plenty of low level
> gnolls there. In general it is binding more than anything that is keeping
> people from spreading out the way Brad wants them too. It isn't
> uninteresting treasure, they just go get that when they know they can't die
> there, then complain because it is trivial to them at that level. Binding
> keeps people close to cites, try playing at a non-prime time like I do many
> times when there are only 600 people on-line. getting bound anywhere isn't
> just a pain, its often impossible. I was unable to find anyone even capable
> of binding on all of faydwyr one morning, and so packed it in since a 40
> minute boat trip to recover a corpse is ridiculous. this is my one and only
> real peeve with EQ, binding is given out as a 'skill', when in reality
> without adventuring can become ridiculously difficult, simply because there
> are not enough people playing. That is unacceptable.
>
> Kitasi of E'ci
>