[<a href='5766.html'>Next Message in Time</a>] | 
[<a href='5764.html'>Previous Message in Time</a>] | 
[<a href='5767.html'>Next Message in Topic</a>] | 
[<a href='5761.html'>Previous Message in Topic</a>] <br/><br/>
<b>Message ID:</b> 5765 <br/>
<b>Date:</b> Fri Aug 27 22:27:58 BST 1999 <br/>
<b>Author:</b> Jesse <br/>
<b>Subject:</b> RE: Chain vs. snare <br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-403540286"><blockquote><span title="ireply">&gt; Michael is right - Snare is superior in effect to chains when it works, i <br/>
&gt; don&#39;t understand why this is being argued. There are disadvantages to both: <br/>
&gt; Ensnare cost mana (big w00p, it&#39;s lvl 1 druid spell), and caster must stand <br/>
&gt; still. Chains does not last very long, but the cool thing about it is you <br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>Just a minor point, but make sure your druid is using Snare, NOT Ensnare.<br/>
Snare is a level 1 spell, Ensnare is a level 24/29/34 (forget which)<br/>
spell. Snare lasts a set time, Ensnare is inferior -- it costs more mana<br/>
and usually runs out in 3-9 seconds.</div>