[Next Message in Time] | [Previous Message in Time] | [Next Message in Topic] | [Previous Message in Topic]

Message ID: 7011
Date: Wed Sep 22 22:28:03 BST 1999
Author: Daniel P. Sniderman
Subject: Re: On the topic of petitions (long, but an important r ead)


I'll second that - I'm pretty sure there was some official at Verant who
made the statement that Selo's was SUPPOSED to break root - but not SOW. If
Laena and my memory is correct - than they "broke" one and "fixed" the
other...

Slyde - 23 of Xegony
----- Original Message -----
From: Jason Osborne <jasono@...>
To: <eqbards@onelist.com>
Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 1999 1:00 PM
Subject: RE: [eqbards] On the topic of petitions (long, but an important r
ead)


> From: Jason Osborne <jasono@...>
>
> I think this e-mail looks great, but I do agree that we should comment on
> the changed behavior of Selo's and SOW. I had thought that Selo's
breaking
> root was a confirmed feature of the song (I'm positive I remember someone
> from Verant making that comment once) which is now broken. This should,
at
> least, be investigated.
>
> --Laena, Bard 22 E'ci
>