[<a href='7463.html'>Next Message in Time</a>] | 
[<a href='7461.html'>Previous Message in Time</a>] | 
[<a href='7464.html'>Next Message in Topic</a>] | 
[<a href='7457.html'>Previous Message in Topic</a>] <br/><br/>
<b>Message ID:</b> 7462 <br/>
<b>Date:</b> Thu Sep 30 23:55:17 BST 1999 <br/>
<b>Author:</b> jhenders@xxxxx.xxx <br/>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: Re: Hey, this sounded interesting <br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-1135804609">On Thu, Sep 30/99, &quot;Garramone, Michael (CCI-Las Vegas)&quot; &lt;<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:Michael.Garramone@...">Michael.Garramone@...</a>&gt; wrote:<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; <br/>
&gt; as i said before, a couple months into the game, this experience loss was<br/>
&gt; reduced by quite a bit.  above level 30, i would lose anywhere from 1/2 to<br/>
&gt; 1/4 what i used to.  that to me is more a time saver than running across a<br/>
&gt; few zones.  you can have one or the other, bind or MUCH less experience<br/>
&gt; loss.  i am happy with what they did.  i can&#39;t speak for everyone.<br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>Don&#39;t forget, however, at least according to our former inside source,<br/>
JM Cappozi, that they also massively increased the amount of exp<br/>
required to level shortly after this without telling us. Still,<br/>
psychologically, not losing 2+ bubbles when you die (man did that suck)<br/>
is a lot easier to take, even if it takes just as long to make back the<br/>
exp you lost as it did when you did lose it.<br/>
<br/>
-- <br/>
  Artificial Intelligence stands no chance against Natural Stupidity.<br/>
            GAT d- -p+(--) c++++ l++ u++ t- m--- W--- !v<br/>
                 b+++ e* s-/+ n-(?) h++ f+g+ w+++ y*</div>