[Next Message in Time] | [Previous Message in Time] | [Next Message in Topic] | [Previous Message in Topic]

Message ID: 7479
Date: Fri Oct 1 00:31:15 BST 1999
Author: kim@xxxxxxxxxx.xxxx
Subject: RE: Hey this sounded interesting..


On Thu, 30 Sep 1999, Kimes, Dean W. wrote:
>
> Definitely Agreed! Still I can't figure out why people think running naked
> accross the world to you body is more fun than regaining exp you had fun
> getting the first time just so you don't get set back in some bizarre got to
> get to the next level plan. What's up with that? Does anyone understand
> that at all and can explain it logically? I mean you had fun getting those
> xp the first time. You get to get them all over again and have fun again?

EQ really is more a powergamer's game, and thus loss of
experience is a penalty, not a benefit as you seem to imply.
:-)

I'll repeat I don't understand either why the bind location
rules are different for casters and melee. All the arguments
I can come up with for not allowing melee to bind anywhere are
short circuited because casters can do the same thing by
binding anywhere. Maybe if casters came back at zero mana I
could understand...

I don't consider it that big a deal though. I dunno, maybe I
just don't die as often as you do.

--
John H. Kim
kim@...