>is anyone happy with the classes they play? besides me i guess. you do
>know all of these particular things were in effect since the game came out.
>did you expect them to change?
>
>Shada
>
> > No bind, not a caster class
> > No Parry, not a melee class
> > No special weapons, not a hybrid class
> > etc., etc., etc.

I am very happy with the classes I play. I have a level 40 druid and a
level 23 bard. In spite of Verant's nerfing of both classes from time to
time, I still enjoy them.

There are things my druid can do that my bard can't and visa versa. Bind is
one of those. Many times I'll be playing my druid and run into a situation
that my bard could have handled,(if levels were the same) that the druid
couldnt.... and visa versa.

As for bards getting bind. I don't think that will happen, nor do I think
it should.. unless the hybrid and melee classes get it too.(otherwise you
will have people claiming bards are too powerful, which will lead to a nerf
for bards later on) I dont, however, appreciate having to run through 3 or
4 zones to retreive my stuff, but that is the price I pay for having so much
fun with my bard. I think, perhaps, a compromise to the problem would be to
allow the classes that don't have bind to get bound anywhere with the popup
box for consent, as someone on here suggested.

I think this would help solve the problem of not being able to find a bind
in cities, because all the casters are out fighting somewhere.

The fact is, that you can't make everyone happy all of the time.

-Treehugger and Songmaker