[Next Message in Time] | [Previous Message in Time] | [Next Message in Topic] | [Previous Message in Topic]

Message ID: 7753
Date: Mon Oct 4 20:26:44 BST 1999
Author: Naeeldar
Subject: Re: Hey this sounded interesting..


Heh yes well the shaman form of the spell is a lot more efficent then the
mana stone. The necro form of it is the best in the game the level 34 spell
for it trades 15hp for 15mana. The manastone is not that efficent at all.

Naeeldar

-----Original Message-----
From: Lonnie Lewis <LLewis@...>
To: 'eqbards@onelist.com' <eqbards@onelist.com>
Date: Monday, October 04, 1999 10:52 AM
Subject: RE: [eqbards] Hey this sounded interesting..


>From: Lonnie Lewis <LLewis@...>
>
>> From: jhenders@...
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 04/99, "Lange, Stephen" <SLANGE@...> wrote:
>> > From: "Lange, Stephen" <SLANGE@...>
>> >
>> > Mana Stone
>> >
>> > From: "Naeeldar" <jackal@...>
>> >
>> > Heh diffrence is that there is no way to regain mana quickly like their
>> is
>> > for hp.
>>
>> Which allows you to trade 3 hp for one mana point. Unless you have regen
>> or a paladin topped up on mana to heal the person using it, it's
>> useless.
>>
> Don't forget a bard to heal :) I had a shaman using a spell similar
>to that last night. The first time he did it, we were all a bit scared
when
>we saw his hps go from full to one bubble real quickly.
>
>
> Bien
>
>>