[<a href='7787.html'>Next Message in Time</a>] | 
[<a href='7785.html'>Previous Message in Time</a>] | 
[<a href='7790.html'>Next Message in Topic</a>] | 
[<a href='7785.html'>Previous Message in Topic</a>] <br/><br/>
<b>Message ID:</b> 7786 <br/>
<b>Date:</b> Mon Oct  4 21:53:45 BST 1999 <br/>
<b>Author:</b> Miriana <br/>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: Hey this sounded interesting.. <br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-1931424">On Mon, 4 Oct 1999, Naeeldar wrote:<br/>
<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; From: &quot;Naeeldar&quot; &lt;<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:jackal@...">jackal@...</a>&gt;<br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; Heh yes well the shaman form of the spell is a lot more efficent then the<br/>
&gt; mana stone. The necro form of it is the best in the game the level 34 spell<br/>
&gt; for it trades 15hp for 15mana. The manastone is not that efficent at all.<br/>
&gt; <br/>
 </span></blockquote>	Absolutely not.  The shaman spell is 60 hp for 20 mana, exactly<br/>
the same.  The only difference is Shaman get regen rather early and can<br/>
get an advantage out of using the stone without outside assistance.<br/>
<br/>
Miriana Windryder</div>