[Next Message in Time] |
[Previous Message in Time] |
[Next Message in Topic] |
[Previous Message in Topic]
Message ID: 950
Date: Fri May 21 01:58:35 BST 1999
Author: Tony Butler
Subject: Re: Why bards DON'T stink
>Let's face it, bards are best at low level. I was talking to a higherUulas is correct. My most frequently used songs (in melee areas) are Anthem
>level bard, Uulas, 22nd level, and he said he NEVER uses any songs from
>13th level - 18th level. Good old Anthem de Arms and Hymn of Restoration
>with a bit of the Bellow are it, pretty much. Don't just ignore his
>advice, either, he is widely regarded as one of the best bards and an
>excellent party member on this server. I have heard it said that "Uulas
>could make any group good." Looking over the bard song list, only the
>invisibility, flight, and mana regeneration spells look that much
>different from what we already have.
>So, to all of us who are hoping to hit the higher levels someday: don't beYes, that was a point I was trying to make earlier when I said bards are
>down about it, but bards don't make a good "core" party member. We just
>make any party MUCH BETTER. Last night I hooked up with a cleric, a
>wizard, and a rogue. Almost the perfect group, right? Tank, nuke, and
>heals. With me in there, the efficiency skyrocketed. We fought a solid 2
>hours with perhaps 10 minutes of down time. We were taking little to no
>damage, mowing through the beetles and lesser undead in Unrest like a
>Catholic priest who was also the Orkin man. ;)
>
>I guess that's my main point. Not a CORE member, but one heck of an
>accessory. Does that make sense?