El Muerte/GQP

GQP stands for Gameserver Query Protocol (working title)

Purpose

This document serves as a working draft for a RFC to be written later.

At the moment, there's only one protocol that can be considered a standard: the GameSpy protocol. But this protocol is not well defined and has some design flaws.

Hopefully, game developers and server query programs (like [qstat] or [ASE]) will adopt this specification once it's complete.

Authors

If you are going to work on the design of this protocol, please add your name here for later reference.

Michiel Hendriks <elmuerte@drunksnipers.com>
Guillaume Cocatre-Zilgien, a.k.a. "skamp" - http://www.skamp.net/

Design features

the protocol should be as basic and serve as many purposes as possible, so it can be implemented in every game;
authentication, possibility to protect data (through encryption/encoding?);
easily extensible with new query commands;

...

Grammar

Client request

    QUERY           ::= ( ENCODED )? COMMAND ( GS COMMAND )* EOT
    ENCODED         ::= SOH STRING ACK
    COMMAND         ::= STRING ( RS ARGUMENT-LIST )? 
    ARGUMENT-LIST   ::= STRING ( US STRING )*

Server response

    RESPONSE        ::= ( ENCODED )? COMMAND-REPLY ( GS COMMAND-REPLY )* EOT
    COMMAND-REPLY   ::= STATUS-CODE COMMAND-NAME RS DATA
    COMMAND-NAME    ::= STRING
    STATUS-CODE     ::= DIGIT DIGIT
    DATA            ::= ACK
                      | RECORD ( RS RECORD )*
    RECORD          ::= DC1 STRING                // a simple string
                      | DC2 STRING US STRING      // name = value
                      | DC3 STRING ( US STRING )* // array
                      | DC4 STRING ( US STRING )* // labeled array (first element is the label)
                                            
    SOH             ::= <SOH>
    EOT             ::= <EOT>
    GS              ::= <GS>
    RS              ::= <RS>
    US              ::= <US>
    STRING          ::= ( <printable> )*
    DIGIT           ::= '0' ... '9'
    ACK             ::= <ACK>
    DC1             ::= <DC1>
    DC2             ::= <DC2>
    DC3             ::= <DC3>
    DC4             ::= <DC4>

Server reponse data

The server respons data (the rules DATA and RECORD) can be one of the following format:

empty reply: only an <ACK>
text: just a single string as reply

  "single item"

name/value: both a name and value

  "label" => "single item"

array: an array of value

  Array ("item one", "item two", "item three")

labeled array: an array with a label

  "label" => Array ("item one", "item two", "item three")

<DLE>, <EOT>, <ETB>, <GS>, <RS>, <US>, <ACK>, <SOH>, <STX> and <ETX> are ASCII control codes (the first 32 symbols in the ASCII table).

<printable> is every non-control code in the ASCII table.

Skamp: When needed, transmissions shall be split into blocks ending with <ETB>, <EOT> indicating overall completion.

El Muerte TDS: you don't need to split transmission into blocks, UDP is pretty much a constant stream of data so just start with reading until you get an <EOT>

Skamp: Mmm-kay.

Encoding

When a Query or Command starts with <SOH>, the data is encoded up to <EOT>.

The <SOH> control character is followed by a string containing encoding information terminated by <ACK>. The choice of encoding is up to the implementor.

Skamp: I believe that <DLE> is more suitable for type definition; besides, one might want to specify more than one kind of encoding: for instance, "bzip2" + "UTF-8"...

El Muerte TDS: the string is just a identification string, so if you want "bzip2" + "utf-8" you can just use "bzip2+utf-8" as string, or even "MySpecialEncoding". It really doesn't matter.

Skamp: I'm just affraid of implementations to use different syntaxes. One would use standard notations, and another one would use "zip/english" because it's just more convenient. You're right, it doesn't really matter, as long as we specify a standard - or use an existing - ASCII notation.

El Muerte TDS: we could say use a mime string, application/gzip for example, or application/x-gamespy

Status Codes

Returned codes per command:

Code	Meaning
10	OK	The command returned succesfully
20	Unknown command
21	Unsupported feature	The requested feature is not supported, can be returned in case of encoding or authentication
22	Incorrect number of arguments	Command requires more or fewer arguments; in the latter case, this status code may be ignored
23	Invalid argument	One ore more arguments aren't correctly formated
30	Disabled	This command has been disabled by the admin
31	Temporarily unavailable	This service or command is temporarily unavailable
32	Unauthorised	Not authorised to use this command or invalid credentials
40	Unsupported encoding	The used encoding isn't supported
41	Decode error	An error occured while decoding

Required commands

The following commands should be supported by every implementation:

identify: return game identification info

input: none

output: gamename = tag; gamever = version; netver = minimal net version

echo: return the argument

input: any number of arguments

output: return each input argument

auth: return challenge info to be used with the challenge command in order to access protected commands, or to be supplied with encoded data.

input: login; password;

output: challenge string

challenge: validate the client after an authentication

input: challenge string

output: none

extensions: return the list of accepted extensions to the protocol

input: none

output: list

...

Example queries

Note: in the following examples, data sent to or received from the server is not real, but has been adapted to a more readable format.

Query

  "identify" <EOT>

Response

  10 "identify" <RS> "gamename" <US> "ut" <RS> "gamever" <US> "432" <RS> "netver" <US> "432" <EOT>

Query

  "unknown command" <EOT>

Response

  20 "unknown command" <RS> <STX> "error: unknown command" <EOT>

  20 <RS> <ACK> <EOT>

Query

  "echo" <RS> "this text" <GS> "echo" <RS> "more text" <EOT>

Response

  10 "echo" <RS> <STX> "this text" <GS> 
  10 "echo" <RS> <STX> "more text" <EOT>

A test page: http://unreal.elmuerte.com/GQP/

Reference

ASCII Table

Notation	Meaning	Hex. code	Dec. code
<SOH>	Start Of Header	01	1
<STX>	Start of TeXt	02	2
<ETX>	End of TeXt	03	3
<EOT>	End Of Transmission	04	4
<ACK>	Acknowledge	06	6
<DLE>	Data Link Escape	10	16
<DC1>	Device Control 1	11	17
<DC2>	Device Control 2	12	18
<DC3>	Device Control 3	13	19
<DC4>	Device Control 4	14	20
<ETB>	End of Transmission Block	23	17
<GS>	Group Separator	1d	29
<RS>	Record Separator	1e	30
<US>	Unit Separator	1f	31

Sources:

Discussion

El Muerte TDS: Everything on this page is subject for changing, this my initial concept.

Skamp: Good start! I think that in the future, technical specifications won't be enough: we will also need implementation guidelines.

Skamp: I've made some spelling and phrasing corrections, I hope you don't mind.

Skamp: Added some suggestions; I'm going to bed now :-)

Skamp:

About TYPE:

The added TYPE would allow the specification of the item's type (hexadecimal, decimal, 16 bits or 32 bits integer, signed / unsigned, etc...). I think it is important to include such information; besides, as a single char it wouldn't take much space.

The default type would apply by default to every item in the list, if not specified otherwise on a case by case basis (specific type).

El Muerte TDS: I think it's best to simple use plain 8bit ASCII for everything. And if the data is transmitted in UNICODE you would just add <SOH> "UNICODE" <ACK> in front of your transmission. I want to prevent binary data as much as possible. (unless you use an encoding)

Skamp: I didn't realize that. You should specify it somewhere, although I'm not sure to agree with that. Binary mixes quite well with ASCII, while being very suitable for numbers, and lightweight. Type enforcement is a big concern to me, since existing implementations of the GameSpy protocol have shown to be very inconsistent. I believe we need a stricter protocol.

On another subject: your redefined RECORD is much simpler and clearer than mine, sometimes I probably should go to bed earlier :-) By the way, EBNF standard notation for comments encloses them in (* *); although it doesn't matter now that you used C-like notation, it will matter when writing the RFC.

El Muerte TDS: The problem with binary data is that it will introduce endian problems (sure it's a single line in the definition that everything is big endian), But i just want to make sure we don't have to deal with 0x00.

EBNF has a format for comments ?! Didn't know that.